Dissident Genders and Sexualities in The OT
Dissident Genders and Sexualities in The OT
Dissident Genders and Sexualities in The OT
Objective: To map, characterize, and analyze peer-reviewed journal articles related to the LGBTQIA1 population
in the occupational therapy literature.
Data Sources: We searched for journal articles published up to December 2021 indexed in the Virtual Health
Library, CINAHL, SciELO Citation Index, SCOPUS, and Web of Science.
Study Selection and Data Collection: We used Arksey and O’Malley’s methodology and the Preferred Reporting
Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) extension for
scoping reviews. Included articles articulated occupational therapy practice, education, research, and theoretical
analysis in relation to LGBTQIA1.
Findings: Forty-three articles published from 1987 to 2021 met the inclusion criteria. They included 28 research
articles, 9 reflection articles, 3 experience reports, and 3 literature reviews.
Conclusions and Relevance: Articles primarily offered general recommendations and possible professional
contributions. More studies that seek to ascertain the effectiveness and limitations of occupational therapy
practice with the LGBTQIA1 population are needed. With its diverse theoretical and methodological assumptions,
occupational therapy can offer support so that professionals can alleviate these people’s suffering in oppressive
conditions and contribute to a more just society.
What This Article Adds: This scoping review provides an overview of academic publications in occupational
therapy on the LGBTQIA1 population, identifies dominant topics and gaps in this context, and points to ways to
advance occupational therapy’s contributions and actions that consider the needs and demands of people of
dissident genders and sexualities.
Leite, J. D., Jr., & Lopes, R. E. (2022). Dissident genders and sexualities in the occupational therapy peer-reviewed literature: A scoping review.
American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 76, 7605205160. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2022.049322
ccupational therapy is “a field of knowledge and social participation, considering social justice (Lopes,
O practices whose focus is humans in their everyday
manifestations—the care of oneself and others, work,
2021; Townsend, 1993).
Hegemonically (Gramsci, 1971), the history of the
play, culture, social participation. [Occupational ther- occupational therapy profession points out that, from
apy involves] studying, dealing with, and intervening the outset, professionals cared for people with physical
to reduce limits and barriers and to activate the poten- impairments and a need for rehabilitation, people with
tial of life, of everyday living” (Galheigo & Sim
o, 2012, intellectual disabilities, and people in mental distress.
p. 35). Historically, most occupational therapists have However, a feminist reading of this history recognizes
addressed individuals who have been excluded from that Hull House and its directors were extremely influ-
elements that comprise citizenship, whether civil, polit- ential in establishing the foundations of the profession
ical, and/or social, to promote personal autonomy and within the social realm, as, for example, within its social
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2022, VOLUME 76, NUMBER 5 1
work with immigrant women and families in situations occupational (Beagan, De Souza, et al., 2012; Jackson,
of vulnerability. Such work marked both immediate 1995) participation. Therefore, occupational therapists
support actions attending to vulnerability and the con- can contribute to developing technical, political, and
struction of theoretical knowledge of these themes as ethical actions that translate into complex social in-
within the scope of what would be called occupational terventions whereby people can be included and
therapy (Monzeli et al., 2019). participate, leading to care and social justice (Ghirardi
The profession is continually reshaped according to et al., 2021; Lopes, 2021).
new emerging problems faced by society, expanding
its possibilities and aiming to contribute to social de-
mands and population groups that could benefit from Method
its professional practices. On the basis of the propo- We conducted a scoping review to identify and map
sition of social occupational therapy, a perspective the peer-reviewed literature focused on people who ex-
that has been present since the 1970s, Barros et al. perience dissident genders and sexualities, apprehend
(2005) pointed out the need for the profession to the robustness of investigations on these subjects, and
focus on supporting individuals and groups who identify gaps that require further research (Arksey &
Full-text articles
Full-text articles assessed for eligibility
excluded
(n = 43)
(n = 0)
(N = 43)
Database searches, n = 37
Reference list searches, n = 6
Note. From “Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement,” by D. Moher, A. Liberati,
J. Tetzlaff, and D. G. Altman; PRISMA Group, 2009, PLoS Medicine, 6 (7), e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
also addressed this population. Articles published from the objectives of these articles, we divided this axis into
1995 to 2015 were mostly about homosexuality and four subthemes: work, gender affirmation, critical reflec-
bisexuality. tion, and instrumentalization for professional practice.
We categorized the articles into three axes of
analysis: (1) demands for occupational therapy, (2) Work
professional education, and (3) interventions. Some The findings that dealt with the dimension of
articles are included in more than one axis. In the work had different approaches, such as the chal-
analysis that follows, we identify how each category lenges involved in assuming a dissident identity in
dialogued and can inform the profession. the work environment, such as stereotypes and
gender performances expected for certain posi-
Demands for Occupational Therapy tions and discrimination experienced (Daly &
The articles mostly point to life paths of the Hynes, 2020; Phoenix & Ghul, 2016; Soeker et al.,
LGBTQIA1 population that do not necessarily start 2015); woman-to-woman rape and sexual assault and
from experiences in occupational therapy but address the impacts on victims’ occupations, including when
the profession and professionals by aiming to facilitate they work in places that welcome other women who
and inform possibilities for actions with these people, have been raped (Twinley, 2017); the experiences of
considering their needs or challenges. To better describe lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer occupational
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2022, VOLUME 76, NUMBER 5 4
Figure 2. Distribution of articles included in the scoping review, by year.
7
5
No. of Arcles
0
1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
therapists (Beagan, Carswell, et al., 2012; Falzarano and the notion of emancipatory health in the trans
& Pizzi, 2015); and the ways an organization’s population in Chile (G omez-Antilef et al., 2020); the
work climate can interfere with the inclusion of gay affirmation process of transgender people and its im-
men, lesbians, and bisexuals (Jackson, 2000). pact on the world of work (Bar et al., 2016; Daly &
Hynes, 2020; Phoenix & Ghul, 2016); the reality of
Gender Affirmation young travesties dealing with challenges, violence, and
Another group of articles focused on gender affirma- pleasures in educational, family, and sex work spaces
tion process, in which people shape their identity and (Monzeli et al., 2015); and a case study about a cross-
body according to the gender with which they identify. dresser and the nuances of creating a new persona
We found articles about self-construction processes (Curtis & Morris, 2015).
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2022, VOLUME 76, NUMBER 5 5
Critical Reflection occupational therapy, reiterating the need for the pro-
Articles in the critical reflection subtheme set out criti- fession to review its attitudes, considering color and
cal arguments related to the professional field, with the social class in its propositions. Nowaskie et al. (2020)
aim to rethink theoretical and practical assumptions surveyed dentistry, medicine, occupational therapy,
and take into account the relevance of professionals to pharmacy, physician assistant, physiotherapy, and so-
the demands of the LGBTQIA1 population. The re- cial work students in several U.S. universities and
flections elucidated how gender and sexuality are showed that occupational therapy students had the
elementary variables in understanding the possibilities lowest workload including content regarding LGBT
of experimentation in people’s everyday lives and people, interacting with fewer than five LGBT patients
occupations. These reflections dialogued with social per year. In a survey study comparing transphobia
occupational therapy based on queer theory (Braga among undergraduate social work, nursing, psychol-
et al., 2020; de Melo, 2016); practice with elderly peo- ogy, and occupational therapy students at a U.S.
ple and in the context of aging (Correia et al., 2020; public university, Acker (2017) found that occupa-
Harrison, 2001; Simon et al., 2021; Twinley, 2014); tional therapy students had high levels of transphobia.
and the experiences of gay, lesbian, bisexual, and queer Leite and Lopes (2017) investigated the curricula of
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2022, VOLUME 76, NUMBER 5 9
dissident genders and sexualities: Collective occupations during the *Jackson, J. (1995). Sexual orientation: Its relevance to occupational
COVID-19 pandemic]. Interinstitutional Brazilian Journal of science and the practice of occupational therapy. American Journal of
Occupational Therapy, 4, 460–487. https://doi.org/10.47222/ Occupational Therapy, 49, 669–679. https://doi.org/10.5014/
2526-3544.rbto34440 ajot.49.7.669
*Crepeau, E. B. (1998). Clinical interpretation of “my secret life”: The *Jackson, J. (1998). The value of occupation as the core of treatment:
emergence of one gay man’s authentic identity. American Journal of Sandy’s experience. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52,
Occupational Therapy, 52, 570–572. https://doi.org/10.5014/ 466–473. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.52.6.466
ajot.52.7.570 *Jackson, J. (2000). Understanding the experience of noninclusive
*Curtis, M., & Morris, K. (2015). Cross-dressing as a meaningful occupational therapy clinics: Lesbians’ perspectives. American
occupation: A single case study. British Journal of Occupational Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.5014/
Therapy, 78, 706–712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022615586568 ajot.54.1.26
*Daly, V., & Hynes, S. M. (2020). A phenomenological study of *Javaherian, H., Christy, A. B., & Boehringer, M. (2008). Occupational
occupational participation for people who identify as transgender. therapy practitioners’ comfort level and preparedness in working
Annals of International Occupational Therapy, 3, 127–135. https://doi. with individuals who are gay, lesbian, or bisexual. Journal of Allied
org/10.3928/24761222-20200309-04 Health, 37, 150–155.
*de Melo, K. M. M. de. (2016). Terapia ocupacional social, pessoas trans *Jessop, N. (1993). Occupational therapy with a male-to-female
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2022, VOLUME 76, NUMBER 5 10
changes, same pathologizing essence]. Revista Internacional de identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and/or transgender (LGBT). Open
Sociologia, 75, e059. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2017.75.2.15.63 Journal of Occupational Therapy, 9(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.15453/
*McCave, E. L., Aptaker, D., Hartmann, K. D., & Zucconi, R. (2019). 2168-6408.1742
Promoting affirmative transgender health care practice within *Soeker, S., Bonn, G. L., de Vos, Z., Gobhozi, T., Pape, C., & Ribaudo, S.
hospitals: An IPE standardized patient simulation for graduate health (2015). Not STRAIGHT forward for gays: A look at the lived
care learners. MedEdPORTAL, 15, 10861. https://doi.org/10.15766/ experiences of gay men, living in Cape Town, with regard to their
mep_2374-8265.10861 worker roles. Work, 51, 175–186. https://doi.org/10.3233/
Miskolci, R. (2017). Teoria queer: Um aprendizado pelas diferenças WOR-141848
[Queer theory: Learning from differences] (3rd ed.). Aut^entica Spivak, G. C. (2015). Can the subaltern speak? In P. Williams & L.
Editora. Chrisman (Eds.), Colonial discourse and post-colonial theory
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G.; PRISMA Group. (pp. 66–111). Routledge.
(2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- *Swenson, R., Alldred, P., & Nicholls, L. (2022). Doing gender and being
Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. gendered through occupation: Transgender and non-binary
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 experiences. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 85, 446–452.
*Monzeli, G. A., Ferreira, V. S., & Lopes, R. E. (2015). Entre proteç~ao, https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226211034422
exposiç~ao e admiss~
oes condicionadas: Travestilidades e espaços de Townsend, E. (1993). 1993 Muriel Driver Lecture—Occupational
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2022, VOLUME 76, NUMBER 5 11