State of Arkansas V Charles and Judy Warren
State of Arkansas V Charles and Judy Warren
State of Arkansas V Charles and Judy Warren
v. CASE NO.
COMPLAINT
I. INTRODUCTION
discrimination on the basis of sex in the rental of single-family residences in violation of Ark.
County by subjecting them to hostile housing environments and requests for sexual acts in
exchange for rental benefits. Defendant Charles made unwelcome sexual comments to the
tenants, touched their bodies without consent, requested sexual acts from them, and offered them
rental benefits in exchange for sexual acts. Defendant Judy is vicariously liable for Defendant
Charles’s discriminatory conduct because Defendant Charles acted as the agent of both
Defendants when he sexually harassed tenants at properties in which Defendant Judy had an
ownership interest or was responsible for the management of the properties with Defendant
Charles.
3. The Arkansas Fair Housing Act prohibits a person from refusing to sell or rent
after the making of a bona fide offer or refusing to negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise
make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to persons because of sex. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-
310(a).
connection with the sale or rental” because of sex. Ark Code Ann. § 16-123-310(b).
made, printed, or published any notice, statement, or advertisement with respect to the sale or
to make such a preference, limitation, or discrimination” because of sex. Ark. Code Ann. § 16-
123-311.
attempt to intimidate or interfere with a person exercising his or her rights under the Arkansas
7. The State brings this action to enforce the provisions of the Arkansas Fair
Housing Act.
Page 2 of 11
II. DEFENDANTS AND SUBJECT PROPERTIES
8. At all times relevant to this action, Defendants resided at 4507 Finn Road,
9. During the time period relevant to this action, Defendants were the owners,
10. The Subject Properties included, but are not limited to, the following locations:
72401; 707 Creath Ave., Jonesboro, AR 72401; and 3528 Viking St., Jonesboro, AR 72401.
11. The Subject Properties are “dwellings” within the meaning of Ark. Code Ann. §
16-123-302(9).
12. Defendant Charles owned or was involved in the management of the Subject
Properties, including, but not limited to, showing the properties to prospective tenants, executing
leases, collecting rent, receiving maintenance requests, and communicating with tenants.
13. Defendant Judy owned or was involved in the management of the Subject
Properties, including, but not limited to, reviewing applications, approving tenants, and
III. JURISDICTION
14. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-
341(a).
Page 3 of 11
15. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-341(a)
because Defendants reside and conduct business in Craighead County, Arkansas, and because the
16. Since at least 2019, Defendants subjected female tenants of the Subject Properties
to discrimination on the basis of sex, including unwelcome and severe or pervasive sexual
harassment. The discriminatory conduct included, but was not limited to:
e. Menacing female tenants by entering their homes without their permission and
with no apparent legitimate reason; and
17. For example, on October 13, 2020, Defendant Charles subjected Ms. Devonnia
Horner to unwelcome sexual contact and comments. Defendant Charles showed Ms. Horner and
her two children a Subject Property that was available for rent. After viewing the Subject
Property, Ms. Horner completed the rental application. While Ms. Horner was completing the
rental application, Defendant Charles brushed his elbow against her breast. As Ms. Horner was
leaving the Subject Property, Defendant Charles grabbed Ms. Horner’s breasts and stated, “I
Page 4 of 11
would love to suck on those titties.”1 Ms. Horner began to gather her belongings to leave when
Defendant Charles also grabbed Ms. Horner’s hand and brushed it against his penis.2
18. Ms. Horner filed a police report concerning Defendant Charles’s conduct that
same day.3 A criminal case was opened against him, and a No Contact Order was issued on
November 4, 2020.
19. On or around November 4, 2020, Ms. Horner filed a complaint with the
Department of Housing and Urban Development, No. 06-21-9889-8, and the Arkansas Fair
Housing Commission (“AFHC”), No. 21-011. She alleged she was injured by Defendant
Charles’s sexual harassment and the harassment subjected her to discriminatory terms,
conditions, or privileges of a rental unit based on her sex. Ms. Horner also alleged that Defendant
20. AFHC determined that reasonable cause existed to believe the Defendants
discriminated against Ms. Horner based on sex in violation of Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-123-310(b),
13-123-311, and 16-123-344. On September 22, 2021, AFHC issued a Charge of Discrimination5
1
Exhibit A.
2
Id.
3 Id.
4
Exhibit B.
5 Exhibit C.
6 Exhibit D.
Page 5 of 11
21. During the investigation of Ms. Horner’s complaint, AFHC determined that
22. For example, in and around November to December of 2019, Defendant Charles
subjected a female tenant (“Tenant A”) to unwelcome sexual contact and indecent exposure
when he touched her buttocks and exposed himself to the female tenant while performing a
sexual act upon himself.7 The first inappropriate encounter occurred when Defendant Charles
claimed he needed to enter the female tenant’s apartment to check the heat. While Tenant A was
bent over attaching a cable to the TV for the children, Defendant Charles touched her buttocks
without her consent. The second encounter occurred when Defendant Charles again claimed he
needed to check the heat. During this encounter, Defendant Charles repeatedly stated how
beautiful he thought Tenant A was while he exposed his penis. Defendant Charles’s
inappropriate conduct was unwelcome, unwanted, and made Tenant A feel uncomfortable and
23. In another example, in and around July 2020, Defendant Charles subjected a
female tenant (“Tenant B”) to unwelcome sexual comments, advances, and contact.8 Defendant
Charles was “very flirty” with Tenant B and would frequently touch her in an inappropriate
manner by grabbing her breasts and touching her body.9 Even after being told to stop, Defendant
Charles continued to sexually harass Tenant B. On another occasion, Defendant Charles stated,
7
Exhibit E.
8
Exhibit F.
9
Id.
Page 6 of 11
“they would help with paying [Tenant B’s] rent” while staring at her breasts.10 On another
occasion, Defendant Charles indecently exposed himself and asked Tenant B “if [she] knew how
to give oral sex.”11 Defendant Charles’s inappropriate conduct was unwelcome, unwanted, and
24. In another example, in and around August 2019, Defendant Charles subjected a
female tenant (“Tenant C”) to unwelcome sexual comments and contact. Defendant Charles
would frequently touch Tenant C’s breast when he came to her unit to collect rent. On at least
one occasion, Defendant Charles commented on Tenant C’s breasts by stating “damn you got
some big boobs.”12 Tenant C attempted to get Defendant Charles to stop the inappropriate
conduct by stating she would tell his wife. However, Defendant Charles did not stop the
inappropriate sexual conduct until the father of Tenant C’s children confronted him. Defendant
Charles’s inappropriate conduct was unwelcome, unwanted, and made Tenant C feel
25. In another example, Defendant Charles subjected a female tenant (“Tenant D”) to
unwelcome sexual comments, advances, and contact. Defendant Charles would frequently lift
Tenant D’s shirt, pinch her nipples, and rub his crotch area while speaking to her. Due to
Defendant Charles’s conduct, Tenant D started having a male present when Defendant Charles
would come to the unit to collect rent or any other purpose and eventually moved out of the unit.
Tenant D or her mother informed Defendant Judy of Defendant Charles’s conduct. Defendant
10
Id.
11
Id.
12
Exhibit G.
Page 7 of 11
Charles’s inappropriate conduct was unwelcome, unwanted, and made Tenant D feel
26. The experiences of these four women described in the preceding paragraphs were
not isolated instances. Rather, these instances were part of Defendant Charles’s longstanding
27. Defendants’ conduct described in this complaint caused female tenants to suffer
fear, anxiety, and emotional distress, and interfered with their ability to secure and maintain
representative for Defendant Judy. Defendant Judy is therefore vicariously liable for Defendant
29. Defendant Judy knew, or should have known, about Defendant Charles’s
discriminatory conduct because at least one-person informed Defendant Judy of such. Defendant
Judy had the authority to take preventative and corrective action yet failed to take reasonable
conduct.
30. AFHC requested the State to file a civil action against Defendants in accordance
13
Exhibit H.
Page 8 of 11
V. CAUSES OF ACTION
31. The State realleges and incorporates each allegation contained in the preceding
a. Refused to sell or rent after the making of a bona fide offer, or refused to
negotiate for the sale or rental of, or otherwise made unavailable or denied, a
dwelling to persons because of sex, in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-
310(a);
c. Made statements with respect to the sale or rental of dwellings that indicate a
preference, a limitation, or discrimination based on sex, in violation of Ark. Code
Ann. § 16-123-311; and
34. Female tenants have been injured by Defendants’ discriminatory conduct. These
persons are “aggrieved persons” as defined in Ark. Code Ann. § 16-123-302(1) and have
Page 9 of 11
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
damages including, but not limited to, emotional distress, mental anguish, loss of dignity,
36. The State seeks injunctive and declaratory relief, compensatory and punitive
monetary damages, reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, and any other relief as may be
WHEREFORE, the State of Arkansas prays that this Court enter an Order that:
38. Declares that Defendants’ discriminatory practices violate the Arkansas Fair
Housing Act;
39. Enjoins Defendants, their agents, employees, and successors, and all other person
c. Making statements with respect to the sale or rental of a dwelling that indicate a
preference, limitation, or discrimination based on sex;
d. Interfering with, or threatening to take any action against, any person engaged in
the exercise or enjoyment of rights granted or protected by the Arkansas Fair
Housing Act;
Page 10 of 11
f. Failing or refusing to take such affirmative steps as may be necessary to prevent
the recurrence of any discriminatory conduct in the future and to eliminate, as
nearly as practicable, the effects of Defendants’ unlawful practices.
40. Awards other appropriate relief, including monetary damages to each person
aggrieved by Defendants’ discriminatory conduct, reasonable attorney’s fees, and court costs,
41. Assess civil penalties against Defendants to vindicate the public interest, under
Respectfully submitted,
TIM GRIFFIN
ATTORNEY GENERAL
By:
Reid Adkins, Ark. Bar No. 2015216
Assistant Attorney General
Arkansas Attorney General's Office
323 Center Street, Suite 200
Little Rock, AR 72201
Phone: (501) 682-6491
Fax: (501) 682-8118
Email: [email protected]
Page 11 of 11