Aviation Value Chain 1709162704
Aviation Value Chain 1709162704
Aviation Value Chain 1709162704
This document provides insight and interpretation from IATA into the 2022 economic performance of the
aviation value chain. This is done through the lens of economic benefit, defined as the difference between the
return on invested capital (ROIC) and the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). ROIC measures the
earnings available to pay debt and equity investors in relation to the capital invested. WACC can be seen as the
opportunity cost for the investor, as it is a measure of the alternative return the investor could have had if the
capital were invested in an asset with a similar risk profile. The difference between the two indicates the level of
economic profitability. If the ROIC is greater than the WACC, then the value is being created. Conversely, if the
ROIC is lower than the WACC, then the economic value is lost.
First, we provide an overview of the performance of the value chain as a whole, and then we turn to our insight
into the trends seen at a subsector level.
The aviation sector has revolutionized the way we travel, connect with others, and conduct business. Aviation
generates positive social and economic externalities, both in countries and cities which are home to major
aviation hubs, and in remote locations which benefit from easier access to the global economy. The airline
industry is the biggest subsector in terms of revenue at USD 732 billion in 2022, followed by fuel production
companies at USD 214 billion, freight forwarders at USD 138 billion, and airports at USD 136 billion. Revenue of
other subsectors amounted to USD 230 billion in 2022.
1
As noted in applicable charts and tables
In 2022, most industries in the aviation value chain continued their post-Covid recovery, but the value chain
remained loss-making, generating a total economic loss of USD 69 billion. Fuel and freight forwarders were the
only value-creating subsegments, with their economic benefit relating to aviation activities estimated at USD
7.4 billion and USD 7 billion, respectively. The breakdown of the relative economic profit/loss across the value
chain in 2022 is presented in the chart below.
1. Based on invested capital including goodwill, extrapolated to total industry. Not a zero-sum setup, possible for all subsectors and the value chain as total to be positive
2. Air Navigation Service Providers
Source: IATA-McKinsey aviation value chain analysis, The Airline Analyst, CapitalIQ, Company reports
The airline industry is the largest building block of the aviation value chain but historically, it has been the worst
performer. In 2022, airline companies generated a net economic loss of USD 45.6 billion. The airline industry
remains highly challenging, where shareholders are not rewarded with the return they should expect based on
the risk profile of the investment. Even before the pandemic, airlines were the only value chain subsector where
investors did not get a return above the cost of capital over an extended period. This has its roots in several
factors: low entry and high exit barriers, a high share of fixed costs, high sensitivity to external demand shocks,
a fragmented industry, and a more concentrated supplier landscape, to name a few.
As shown in the chart above, the value chain participants differ significantly in terms of average returns and the
volatility of these returns. Volatility of financial returns refers to the degree of fluctuation in profits over a period
of time. It is an important metric for investors and analysts to assess the financial health of a company. High
volatility indicates that the company’s profits are more susceptible to external shocks, such as changes in
market conditions, economic downturns, or other unforeseen events. In addition to low profitability levels,
airlines have also demonstrated the highest volatility of ROIC. Suppliers to the airline industry have higher
returns and lower variability due to their higher degree of industrial concentration, as well as thanks to the long-
term nature of contracts in place which limits their exposure to travel demand shocks.
Airlines
Airlines were on the road to financial profitability in 2022 but still generated a substantial economic loss. The
airline industry is highly sensitive to external macro-economic factors (including fuel prices, geopolitical
considerations, and natural disasters) both on the revenue and cost side. As the economy grows, demand for
air travel increases, which in turn drives up airline revenues. Conversely, during economic downturns, demand
for air travel decreases, leading to lower revenues and profits for airlines.
1. Aggregated after-tax operating profits divided by aggregated invested capital adjusted for leases
Source: IATA-McKinsey aviation value chain analysis, The Airline Analyst, CapitalIQ, Company reports, IMF
Looking at the past 30 years, there has been a positive correlation between ROIC and real GDP growth rate. All
major global shocks had a negative impact on the return on invested capital, showing that the airline industry is
truly global.
Since 1996, the industry’s ROIC has remained below WACC, though the gap almost closed in 2015. The worst-
ever result was observed during the pandemic in 2020. Since then, the gap has started to decrease, however,
at a slow pace. Due to the introduction of high interest rates in major economies, the cost of capital has risen
and is unlikely to drop significantly in 2023 and 2024, likely limiting the pace of improvement in economic value
creation over this horizon.
Airline industry ROIC including goodwill vs. median WACC, 1996-2022, percent
Source: IATA-McKinsey aviation value chain analysis, The Airline Analyst, CapitalIQ, Company reports
The economic profit power curve (see chart below) shows an uneven distribution of airlines that is heavily tilted
to the loss-making side. In the sample2, 78% of airlines were loss-making in terms of economic benefit. In spite
of the pronounced skew to the downside in airlines’ economic performance, there is nevertheless a small
number of airlines that consistently achieve a ROIC in excess of their cost of capital.
2
Airline sample consisting of 86 companies
1. Every dot making up the line is one airline. Based on ROIC including goodwill
Source: IATA-McKinsey aviation value chain analysis, The Airline Analyst, CapitalIQ, Company reports
The reason why some airlines perform better than others can be attributed to both the market context and to
airline-specific factors. For instance, some airlines may operate in more established markets where capacity
growth is in line with underlying demand growth. Other airlines may excel in areas that are crucial for attracting
customers or maximizing asset productivity, such as ancillary sales, a unique network portfolio, and operational
excellence3.
Count of value-creating carriers (economic profit incl. goodwill > 0) by year, 2012-2022
29 41%
30
39%
50% 3% 27
25
45% 43%
18 44% 19
52%
21%
56%
59% 61% 11 26%
50%
55% 53% 55%
48%
56% 5 53%
44% 18%
100% 27%
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Source: McKinsey Value Chain Study, The Airline Analyst, CapitalIQ, Company reports
In 2022, there were 19 value-creating airlines in the sample, and most of them (53%) were network carriers.
Low-cost carriers represented almost a third of the sample while cargo, after a couple of exceptionally good
years, constituted 22% of the sample. Air cargo was a standout business segment during the pandemic with
soaring ROIC. Grounded passenger jets around the world meant that there was less belly capacity, (which
3
Jaap Bouwer, Alex Dichter, Vik Krishnan, and Steve Saxon, "The six secrets of profitable airlines", McKinsey, June 28, 2022.
Crude oil price development versus. fuel production ROIC (incl. goodwill > 0) by year, 2012-2022
The ROIC of the downstream oil and gas companies is correlated with the price of crude oil that increased by
44%, since the outbreak of the war in Ukraine. The average price of Brent crude reached USD 101 per barrel in
2022.
Refining a barrel of crude oil results in a variety of products. Jet fuel is one of them, and on average it
represents 8% of refined output. Jet fuel was the most expensive refined product in 2022. The jet fuel crack
spread (the difference between the refined product and the crude oil price) spiked in 2022 due to refining
capacity closures in 2020 and 2021, planned and unplanned outages especially in Europe, and constrained
exports (chiefly out of China). Consequently, the price of jet fuel soared to USD 139 per barrel, pushing the
ROIC up for the fuel producers and putting downward pressure on airlines’ financial and economic profitability.
Manufacturers
OEMs, like other participants in the value chain, continued their recovery in 2022, with ROIC turning positive the
first time since 2018. The achieved ROIC, however, did not increase to a level allowing to cover WACC,
consequently posting a net economic loss of USD 1.7 billion. Supply chain issues persisted which prevented
the recovery from reaching full speed. Airlines seeking to acquire more fuel-efficient and quieter equipment
4
Jet fuel is just one output of a refinery, and it is not possible to produce only jet fuel. To estimate economic profit of jet fuel purchased, the economic profit
margins of downstream (companies focused on refinery and marketing of oil & gas products) is applied to the jet fuel spend of the airline sector.
Lessors
Lessors earned a return on equity of about 9% pre-pandemic. 2022 ROE amounted to 7.6% as lease rates
increased and demand recovered. The leasing market has high barriers to entry but is fairly fragmented. Some
consolidation has occurred in recent years, but new companies are entering the market as well. It is a sector
where there is value in diversifying portfolios, to spread risk and tap into different growth rates.
Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, over 400 Western-owned planes were stranded in Russia.
This exceptional event represents between 12 and 15 billion worth of losses, and it remains to be seen how
much will be covered through insurance.
The global figures are also pulled down by North American airport business models that operate on an equity-
free cost-recovery basis. The difference is quite visible when comparing ROIC volatility and average return for a
longer period. European and global airports have higher earnings on average than their North American
counterparts.
The ANSP sector is highly fragmented at the macro level, with many individual ANSPs, but highly concentrated
at the local level, with typically one such provider per country. The ANSP sector reported profits above WACC
levels pre-pandemic. Given high fixed costs and reduced level of flight activity, the ROIC for the subsector was
at -1% in 2022 with a corresponding economic loss of USD 2.5 billion.
Freight Forwarders
Freight forwarders’ track record is one of profitable operations over the past decade. Their profitability was
further boosted by the pandemic as the activity is linked with air cargo volumes and freight rates. In 2022, this
segment generated USD 7.4 billion of economic profit and an impressive ROIC of 27%. As more cargo belly
capacity has come back, freight rates have declined. In turn, the ROIC and economic benefit of freight
forwarders may start to converge to the pre-pandemic levels.
Catering faces similar passenger-variable revenue streams and relatively low fixed costs as the ground handler
segment, with labor representing a significant share of operating expenses. In 2022, the catering subsector
posted a loss of USD 0.6 billion and showed the widest gap to the pre-pandemic ROIC levels, staying behind by
as much as 9.6 percentage points.
Maintenance, repair, and overhaul generated a relatively small loss of USD 0.2 billion compared to other
subsectors.
The airlines operate in an unbalanced setting. The bargaining power of suppliers in the upstream value chain is
high to very high, with duopolies in the case of wide-body aircraft manufacturers and monopolies in the case of
local airports. There is also a high degree of concentration among GDSs and aggregator websites.
Source: IATA update based on original from Professor Michael Porter, 2011
Airlines have outsourced many non-core activities for a number of reasons, one arguably being the quest for
greater value generation. At the current junction, there is a question as to whether airlines could lower the
economic loss and spread some risks by exploring vertical integration of some contracted services, Today, risk
The airline market, compared to many other industries, is fragmented and unconsolidated on a cross-regional
level. Many countries have ownership limits that restrict foreign ownership of local airlines. Consequently, the
movement of capital is stifled, adding a barrier to cross-border consolidation. Consolidation could, in theory,
lead to better network management, cost savings, and improved load factors. Recent delays in aircraft
deliveries have limited airlines' sales growth but, at the same time, improved their load factors and profitability.
Maintaining a high load factor (also known as asset turnover), is one of the key features of profitable airlines.
Aircraft seats are “perishable” in nature (cannot be stored and vanish once the plane takes off) and the marginal
cost of flying an additional passenger is very low. As a result, tickets are sold at cost or even at a loss. To
respond to these challenges, more and more airlines are embracing the hybrid business model, adopting
features of both full-service and low-cost carriers. This strategy can deliver a better pricing strategy and
improved segmentation of passengers into more comfort categories.
The value chain could also greatly benefit from leveraging the data-rich environment in which it operates.
Predictive maintenance, better capacity management during demand surges, and personalized
recommendations that lift ancillary revenue from upselling and cross-selling are all achievable. These could be
maximized further thanks to initiatives such as airport collaborative decision-making (A-CDM), which aim to
improve the operation efficiency of all airport operators.
Collaboration is paramount in achieving another goal that will shape the industry for the next 26 years – that of
decarbonizing the airline industry by 2050. Decarbonization can only be accomplished if the value chain works
together. Sustainable aviation fuel is expected to be the leading pathway towards this goal and requires
substantial investments in refining capacity and in creating a well-functioning market. Airframe and engine
OEMs must continue to develop cleaner technologies (such as hydrogen-powered aircraft) and strive for fuel-
efficient designs. ANSPs can further optimize flight paths and reduce time spent in the air. All this and more can
be greatly aided by collaboration and by data sharing.
Conclusion
The aviation sector is a complex ecosystem that comprises various industries of different sizes, structures, and
financial performances. The aviation value chain as a whole struggles to create economic value over the long
term, and the airline industry tends to be its weakest link. Given the importance of air transportation (and all
forms of transportation and connectivity) in terms of economic development and people’s welfare, the fragility
of the aviation value chain has structural repercussions that go way beyond the aviation sector. At no point in
time has this been illustrated with greater clarity than during the Covid pandemic. It is in the interest of the
global and local economies, as well as in the interest of every participant in the aviation value chain, to favor a
more robust airline industry with a greater capacity to weather the storms that invariably come its way. There
are no easy and readily available solutions for bringing such greater robustness about though. Difficult to
achieve but nevertheless essential for optimizing operations in a sector that is wholly global is the
harmonization of regulation. The cost of countries failing to coordinate and the resulting policy fragmentation
was vividly showcased during the Covid pandemic. A further issue without an apparent solution is the
monopolistic and oligopolistic pricing power in the upstream supply chain. At the other end of the supply chain,
airlines face instant price discovery among their customers on a scale that is unique to the industry. With
limited influence on prices both paid and received, airlines need to find ways to compete among themselves on
factors other than price.
One avenue to explore could be opportunities in terms of both vertical and horizontal integration.
Technological progress, possibly involving artificial intelligence, could alter how some services are delivered,
Terms and Conditions for the use of this IATA Economics Report and its contents can be found here:
By using this IATA Economics Report and its contents in any manner, you agree that the IATA
Economics Report Terms and Conditions apply to you and agree to abide by them. If you do not
accept these Terms and Conditions, do not use this report.