Foi Dgca
Foi Dgca
Foi Dgca
8th Edition i
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
FOREWORD
The following responsibilities of the State of an air operator are explicit within Annex 6, Parts
1 & 3, to the Convention on International Civil Aviation:
• Ensure that the operator continues to maintain the requirements which resulted in the
issuance of the AOC or equivalent document (Para. 4.2.1.4);
In discharge of its responsibilities for regulating air transportation and ensuring safety of aircraft
operations, DGCA has laid down detailed rules, regulations and procedures under the
provisions of Aircraft Act, 1934 and the Aircraft Rules, 1937. The main responsibility for the
safe conduct of the operations and for compliance with the laws, rules, regulations and
directions issued from time to time is that of the operator. These laws and regulations cannot
in themselves provide the operator with comprehensive and detailed instructions on which to
base his operations. The operator should, therefore, develop his own detailed operating
procedures necessary for safety, regularity and efficiency of operations within the frame work
of the laws, rules, regulations, and directions issued by DGCA from time to time. Accordingly,
permits for operating the following types of air transport services are presently issued by DGCA
to applicants who meet the laid down requirements for the specific type of air transport service:
These certificates/ permits are equivalent to the Air Operator's Certificate required to be
granted by ICAO member States in accordance with the provisions of Annex 6. Permits for
any other special type of operation can be granted subject to the applicant showing satisfactory
capability to undertake the type of operations. Certification and continuing surveillance go
hand in hand. The same government infrastructure that ensures a valid certification process
leading to the issuance of an AOC/ AOP will provide for an adequate surveillance program
and for competent day-to-day operator administration and oversight.
This manual is intended to provide detailed instructions for Flight Operations Inspectors of
Directorate General of Civil Aviation, India, to carry out its flight operations certification and
8th Edition 1
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
inspection responsibilities. It is divided into four volumes: Volume 1 contains the procedures
to be followed by the DGCA and operators for the issuance of an AOP/AOC or equivalent
document and is referenced to CAP 3100/ 3300/ 3400 Air Operators Certification Manual.
Volume 2 contains selected practices related to operators and pilot certification and
administration; Volume 3 contains requirements for continuing inspection (surveillance) of
certificated operators; and Volume 4 contains training and qualification requirements of Flight
Operations Inspectors. Many of the types of inspections which are part of a surveillance
programme of certificated operators are practically identical to those required for issuance of
and AOP AOC or equivalent document. Thus, when appropriate, Volume 1 (reference CAP
3100/3300/3400) makes reference to procedures to be followed, which are contained in
Volume 3.
Arun Kumar
Director General of Civil Aviation
India
File No DGCA-22024/20/2021-FSD
8th Edition 2
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
RECORD OF AMENDMENTS
8th Edition 3
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Table of Contents
VOLUME 1............................................................................................................................. 10
VOLUME 2............................................................................................................................. 11
8th Edition 2
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
8th Edition 3
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
8th Edition 4
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
8th Edition 5
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
8th Edition 6
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
8th Edition 7
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
APPENDIX 3.1A DGCA Flight Operations Inspectors’ Orientation Course: Syllabus ......... 196
DGCA Flight Operations Inspectors’ Extended Refresher Course: Syllabus .............. 209
8th Edition 8
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
8th Edition 9
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 1
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
VOLUME 1
CERTIFICATION OF AIR OPERATORS
Refer to
8th Edition 10
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
VOLUME 2
8th Edition 11
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
CERTIFICATE MANAGEMENT
BACKGROUND
1.1.1 Within the air transportation industry there is a need to establish and administer safety
standards to accommodate many variables, including: a wide variety of aircraft; a wide range
of operator capabilities; the various situations requiring different types of air transportation; and
the continual, rapid changes in aviation technology. It is impractical to address these variables
through the promulgation of safety regulations for each and every type of air transport situation
and the varying degrees of operator capabilities. Also, it is impractical to address the rapidly
changing aviation technology and environment through the regulatory process. Safety
regulations would be extremely complex and unwieldy if all possible variations and situations
were addressed by regulation. Instead, the safety standards established by regulation should
usually have a broad application which allows varying acceptable methods of compliance.
1.1.2 Each certificate holder is scrutinised as per the extant regulations at the time of
certification. However, besides the regulations getting updated from time to time, the certificate
holders also have varying requirements which may be broadly classified into two categories
as follows: -
a) Approvals/ Amendments Requiring a Certification Team e.g. addition of new type of aircraft or
additional special authorizations such as PBN or EDTO etc
b) Approvals/ Amendments that do not require a Certification Team e.g. operations to new
airfields/ amendments to SOPs or MEL etc.
1.1.3 Activities under Para 1.1.2 (a) above shall be carried out by the dedicated Certificate
Management team assigned to the Air Operator. The Certificate Management team may
comprise of Flight operations, Airworthiness, Cabin Safety, Dangerous Goods Inspectors and
other personnel as appropriate. The Certificate Management Team will assemble and process
the requests for the amendments/ approvals as required. The detailed process for each such
activity is given in CAP 3100/ 3300/ 3400, as applicable. Further guidance is also provided in
Chapter 2.
1.1.4 Activities under Para 1.1.2 (b) may not require an elaborate five-phase certification
process but still form a part of certificate management activities as they are modifying the
conditions of original certification. However, the activities may often be undertaken by
individual inspectors unless the nature of proposed amendments require the collective scrutiny
of documents e.g. as in the case of MEL. Operations related amendments are generally
documented in the OM or a specific document and consequently need to be processed by a
flight operations inspector. In case a type-rated FOI is not available with DGCA, the document
scrutiny may be carried out by any FOI with the help of a type-rated pilot (preferably
DE/Examiner/SFE/TRI/Check Pilot) who shall provide technical inputs to the FOI. However,
the overall responsibility for the scrutiny shall remain that of the FOI nominated to carry out
the document scrutiny.
8th Edition 12
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1.1.5 Amongst the flight operations inspectors, one shall be nominated as Principal Flight
Operations Inspector (POI) for each certificate holder. The POI shall be responsible for the
processing of all additional approvals/ amendments to the operational approvals accorded to
the Certificate Holder at the time of certification.
1.1.6 The POI shall also be responsible to ensure that the operator regularly updates
relevant documents in response to changes in regulations or other technical documents
pertaining to such as Flight Manual or MMEL etc
1.1.7 Details of Inspectors authorised to review specific documents and the approving/
accepting authority are stipulated in the table below: -
8th Edition 13
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1.1.13 Additions/ amendments to SOPs e.g. for additional routes/ new airfields shall be
processed by the POI as per the relevant instructions given in the CAP 8100. In case the
operations are being commenced before the next revision of the OM is due, the SOP may be
approved as a Temporary Revision to the OM. Care must be exercised that the SOP is
included as part of the OM in the next revision of the OM.
OPERATIONS SPECIFICATIONS
8th Edition 14
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1.3.1 To gain a comprehensive traceability over the observations, FOIs shall notify the
operator, in writing, of the deficiencies found in the contents of the documents submitted by
the operator. Also preferably time period for taking remedial action should be intimated to them
in form of review checklist, which are to be appended, pertaining to UNSATISFACTORY items
of respective checklist.
1.3.2 Inspectors Role:
(a) It is important that the date of receipt of document and submission of observations to operator
are to be recorded by the FOI.
(b) As regards to technical evaluation, FOIs are expected to assess their methodology and
content items to ensure adequate compliance and standards before submitting the final
checklist and consistency shall be maintained by FOIs.
(c) All identified deficiencies of document should be addressed and corrected before presenting
of an approval checklist.
(d) Nodal personnel as identified by the operator shall be responsible for resolution and corrective
action in a timely manner. Any delay, in the time lines, thus caused should be notified to PM.
(e) Deficiencies are communicated to operator responsible for taking corrective action and to
senior management as appropriate.
(f) The FOI shall make recommendations and quote relevant regulation to correct identified
deficiencies. Operator shall be responsible for correcting deficiencies in a timely and effective
manner. Correcting these deficiencies should be a priority during the document phase of
evaluation. FOIs shall track and record all corrective actions and the resolution of the
deficiencies.
(g) The FOI should take appropriate action, when the nodal refuses to correct a misstatement of
fact or Rule position. In this case, top management of the operator must be intimated to initiate
prompt actions to correct deficiencies and verify the corrective actions are implemented
effectively. The same shall be brought to the notice of the PM, without delay.
(h) Adequacy and timing of corrective action, same shall be recorded by FOI.
(i) FOI is to convey the findings to the operator and obtain proposed corrective action and
deadlines for remedying significant deficiencies.
(j) The FOI shall review and verify the actions taken by the operator pertaining to the findings.
8th Edition 15
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(a) The Operator shall determine what actions to take when corrective action is required to
address deficiencies.
(b) Operator shall ensure necessary corrective actions are taken to eliminate detected
nonconformities.
(c) The Operator shall implement the corrective action plan in a timely manner.
(d) The operator/Nodal shall initiate corrective actions to meet the revised time lines. In case the
same cannot be met, then FOI and PM shall be informed to reach amicably acceptable revised
time lines.
8th Edition 16
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
GENERAL
2.1.1 During the certification process for initial certification or amendment of operations
specifications, the Flight Operations Inspector would be required to make an assessment of
the applicant’s capability of carrying out special operations as proposed in the draft operations
specifications. This would involve an assessment of airworthiness and operations aspects.
Generally, the airworthiness elements of the application would be assessed prior to
operational evaluation, however, these may be done concurrently. Operations specifications
shall be endorsed after operational approval which is only after airworthiness approval has
been done.
2.1.2 The process for approval of special operations such as EDTO, PBN, NAT/HLA, RVSM,
Cat II/III, LVTO, EFB, CPDLC, ADS-C/B, HUD, EVS etc., involves the operator following a five
phase process as per CAP 3100/ 3300/ 3400 and submitting an application with the Regional
Office of DCGA where the Airworthiness aspects are evaluated as per airworthiness
procedure manual guidelines. Thereafter the application is forwarded to FSD through Dte of
Airworthiness (HQ) for further scrutiny of operational aspects. The FOI at FSD will evaluate
operational aspects and if found satisfactory recommend operational approval. Operational
approval will be granted by CFOI/ Dy.CFOI/ PM after ensuring that both airworthiness and
operational aspects have been evaluated and found satisfactory. This will form the basis of
Ops Specs endorsement on the AOP/ AOC of the applicant. Once initial approval has been
granted for a special operation, addition of an aircraft of the same type requiring ops specs
endorsement will need the operator to apply at the regional office of DGCA which will issue
the approval on the basis of the initial approval, as long there is no change in the aeroplane
engine/equipment related to the special approval. Referral to HQ DGCA is not required in this
case. In order to process operational approval, the FOI will make use of job aids and checklists
where developed or use the detailed requirements as listed in the applicable CAR both for
cases of initial approval and addition of a similar type of aircraft requiring amendment of ops
specs.
2.1.3 Special Operations approvals follow the same general five phase certification process
for initial approval as below;
8th Edition 17
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
PBN APPROVAL
2.2.1 PBN operational approval is to be processed as per the job aids given in CAR Section
8 Series S Part IV, applicable Operations Circulars (OCs) and CAP 8300 FOI PBN Operational
Handbook making use of the job aids in the Annexures to CAP 8200.
2.3.1 Cat II/III and LVTO operational approval is to be processed as per requirements laid
down in CAR Section 8 Series C Part I, CAR Section 8 Series B Part I making use of the job
aids in CAP 8200 Annexure.
2.3.2 The approval process encompasses the airworthiness and the operational approval.
Although the two have different requirements, they must be considered within the same
process.
2.3.3 This process constitutes an orderly method used by DGCA to ensure that applicants
meet the established requirements.
2.3.4 In phase one, pre-application, the DGCA meets with the operator (pre- application
meeting), who is advised of all the requirements it must meet during the approval process.
2.3.5 In phase two, formal application, the operator submits the formal application,
accompanied by all the relevant documentation, in accordance with formal application
documentation paragraph bellow.
2.3.6 In phase three, review of documentation, the DGCA evaluates the documentation to
determine their admissibility. As a result of this review and evaluation, the DGCA may accept
or reject the formal application together with the documentation.
2.3.7 In phase four, inspection and demonstration, once the DGCA has accepted or
approved the amendments to the manuals, programs and documents submitted, the operator
will:
2.3.8 In Phase five, approval, once all the aforementioned steps have been completed
satisfactorily, the DGCA will issue the operations specifications (Ops Specs). For CAT III the
authorization will specify the lowest DH, or no DH, and lowest RVR for the operator.
2.3.9 Formal Application Documentation.
(a) Airworthiness approval: aircraft must meet the corresponding airworthiness requirements as
established in CAR Section 2 Series O Part XIV.
(b) Application: the operator will submit the following documentation to the DGCA:
8th Edition 18
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(ii) Aircraft qualification documentation: documentation showing that the proposed aircraft meets
the airworthiness requirements;
(vi) Operations manual and checklists: operators will submit the operations manuals and
checklists containing information and guidance on CAT II or CAT III operations;
(vii)Aerodrome operating minima for each aerodrome intended to be used and method used to
establish such minima;
(ix) Any revision to the MEL needed to conduct CAT II or CAT III operations;
(xii)Statement of compliance.
RVSM OPERATIONS
2.4.1 RVSM operational approval is to be processed as per requirements laid down in CAR
Section 8 Series S Part II. The job aid in CAP 8200 Annexure 2 will be used.
2.5.1 It is to be understood that NAT(HLA) is a specific MNPS airspace with stringent criteria.
The details covered in DGCA regulations are for the more stringent NAT(HLA) airspace.
However, the basic principles for approval of MNPS airspace remain same.
2.5.2 MNPS/ NAT (HLA) operational approval is to be processed as per requirements laid
down in CAR Section 8 Series S Part III. The job aid in CAP 8200 Annexure 3 will be used.
2.6.1 General. EDTO operational approval is to be processed as per requirements laid down
in CAR Section 8 Series S Part I and job aids in CAP 8200 Annexure 4.
8th Edition 19
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 1 November 2022
2.6.2 The approval process encompasses airworthiness and the operational approval.
Although the two have different requirements, they must be considered within the same
process. Airworthiness and operations elements can be assessed concurrently, however
operational approval shall only be issued after airworthiness requirements have been met.
2.6.3 This process constitutes an orderly method used by DGCA to ensure that applicants
meet the established requirements. The EDTO operational approval job aid should be used
by the FOI to process the EDTO application in a standardized manner.
2.6.4 The EDTO demonstration checklist is completed by the FOI in this phase.
Demonstration for EDTO more than 60/ 90 minutes (for scheduled/ NSOP operators
respectively) approval shall involve a 3 step process culminating in proving flights;
(c) Proving / Validation flight (Refer CAR Section 8, Series S Part I).
2.6.5 In Phase five, approval, once all the aforementioned steps have been completed
satisfactorily, the DGCA will issue the operations specifications (Ops Specs).
2.7.1 The introduction and use of EFBs in the Cockpit and Cabin require authorization from
FSD, DGCA. This requirement includes DGCA evaluation of all operating procedures,
pertinent training modules, checklists, operations manuals, training manuals, maintenance
programs, minimum equipment lists (MEL), other pertinent documents, and reporting
procedures.
2.7.2 ICAO Annex 6 lays down the standards for the installation/use of EFB equipment. The
standards require specific approval by the DGCA for the operational use of EFB functions for
safe operation of the aircraft. Accordingly, requirements have been laid down in CARs Section
8 Series O Parts II, III, IV & V, CAR Section 8 Series S Part VIII and CAP 8600.
(a) Phase one of the process begins when the operator requests authorization from a regulator
to use the EFB. It should be noted that use of the EFB prior to operational approval does not
imply any deviation from the operator’s present procedures. It simply defines a training phase
which will eventually lead to paperless trials.
8th Edition 20
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(b) During this phase, the regulator and the operator reach a common understanding of when
paperless trials should begin, how they must be conducted and documented, the role of the
regulator, and what documents and actions the operator is responsible for during each phase
of the authorization process. Phase one is typically applicable when the operator transition
from paper to a paperless flight deck; and may not be required by the DGCA.
(a) Phase Two begins when the operator submits a formal compliance plan to FSD, DGCA for
evaluation. The plan is reviewed for completeness and FSD, DGCA may coordinate with other
inspectors and regulatory offices as necessary. Once the plan is accepted, the operator
follows that plan to produce a complete EFB program. The operator must clarify the intent of
the operation (with or without paper back-up or a combination of paperless and paper). The
applicant user should submit the following information in the application package:
(i) EFB hardware and application specification EFB operator procedures/manual revisions, EFB
cockpit procedures checklists,
(iii) EFB RD test data (when required), Complete non-interference test results,
(a) DGCA should conduct a review of the application submitted by an operator. All assigned
regulatory specialties should participate in the review of an operator’s EFB program. DGCA
should participate in the simulator evaluation or flight evaluation of an EFB when an operator
is requesting initial EFB authorization. Additional simulator or flight evaluations are not
required for adding a new EFB to an existing authorization unless there is a substantial change
in EFB intended functions. When a new aircraft is added to a certificate with existing EFB
authorization, the suitability of the EFB for that aircraft must be addressed as part of the aircraft
conformity and configuration control process. DGCA should examine the technical content
and quality of the proposed EFB program and other supporting documents and procedures.
The operator’s program for EFB management is critical to EFB reliability. The EFB program
must address all EFB issues and be well documented.
(a) An interim EFB authorization may be granted to allow the operator to proceed with EFB
validation testing.
(b) For operator transitioning from paper to EFB, during this validation phase, the operator must
maintain paper back-up for all electronic information. The validation phase begins when the
8th Edition 21
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
operator formally begins use of the EFB combined with paper backup for an established period
of time.
(c) For operators starting EFB operations without paperback-up, they must have in place
adequate mitigations means to access the information in case of EFB failures, that are
accepted by the DGCA.
(i) Unacceptable Validation Results. If the DGCA finds the proposed EFB reliability and/or
function to be unacceptable, the DGCA should contact the operator for corrective action. EFB
deficiencies should be corrected and the EFB function revalidated prior to paperless
authorization being issued.
(ii) Acceptable Validation Results. If the DGCA finds the proposed EFB reliability and/or function
to be acceptable based on validation data then paperless authorization may be issued.
(a) A formal letter is issued by the regulatory authority granting use of the EFB to the operator.
Additionally, the approval of a “paperless flight deck” should be added to the authorization, if
it was included as a part of the Ops Evaluation. The initial authorization should define criteria
for changes to the EFB system which may require consideration of an amended authorization
2.8.1 The use Datalink and ADS-C equipment requires authorization from DGCA. This
requirement includes DGCA evaluation of all operating procedures, pertinent training
modules, checklists, Operations Manuals, training manuals, maintenance programs, Minimum
Equipment Lists (MEL), other pertinent documents, and reporting procedures.
2.8.2 This Section provides guidance to inspectors on the process for operators to obtain
Operational Data Link authorization (e.g., Operational Specification (Ops Spec) or other
acceptable approval as applicable) for operation in Oceanic and Remote Airspace. CAR
Section 8 Series S Part VI, OC 16 of 2014 on Data Link and ADS-C as well as Job Aids in
CAP 8200 annexure 17 will be used for the approval process.
2.8.3 Basic Events in Data Link Authorization Process
8th Edition 22
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Lead Action
Reviews the “Basic Events in the Data Link Approval Process” in
Inspector Para 11.7.2 with the operator in the pre-application meeting to provide
1
an overview of approval process events.
Reviews the requirements for approval with the operator to establish the
Inspector
2 form and content of the operator application for Data Link authority.
8th Edition 23
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
This table lists the systems and their operating environment including the applicable criteria
with references.
Operating Environment
Aircraft Applicable Standard
Data Link
System Type of ATS Unit Capabilities and Uses
Airspace System
8th Edition 24
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Operating Environment
Aircraft Applicable Standard
Data Link
System Type of ATS Unit Capabilities and Uses
Airspace System
8th Edition 25
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Operating Environment
Aircraft Applicable Standard
Data Link
System Type of ATS Unit Capabilities and Uses
Airspace System
CADS)
2.9.1 Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) is a new system for air traffic
surveillance within those areas where the ground infrastructure (ADS-B ground station and air
traffic communications network) is in place and available. ADS-B is expected to play an
increasing role in air traffic as its capabilities evolve, and is expected to be a key element in
improving the use of airspace, improving airport surface surveillance, and enhancing safety.
ADS-B Out is the capability to send a formatted message that includes elements such as
position, altitude, velocity, direction, etc., for use by air traffic in providing air traffic separation
services. ADS-B approval considerations are covered in CAR Section 8 Series S Part V, OC
17 of 2014 on ADS-B and job aid in CAP 8200 Annexure 18 will be used.
2.9.2 Application Process.
(a) ADS-B is required for many areas of operations currently flown by Indian AOC holders. The
Indian AOC holder requesting to conduct ADS-B operations shall make application to the
DGCA.
(b) The DGCA will conduct a review of the applicant's submitted proposal using applicable
guidance. When compliance with all applicable requirements has been demonstrated, the
DGCA will forward approval of this phase of certification to the Indian AOC holder.
(c) Once all requirements are completed DGCA shall issue the ADS-B authorization in the
Operations Specifications.
8th Edition 26
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(a) ADS-B provides ATC with an alternate means of surveillance in regions where a radar-based
system would be impractical (e.g., Gulf of Mexico (GOMEX), mountainous terrain, etc.) or
economically viable. ADS-B allows application of reduced separation standards in these areas
and improves the efficiency and safety of operations within the airspace. Currently, ADS-B
provides surveillance coverage in several regions outside of U.S.-designated airspace,
including portions of Australia, Canada, and in the Asia-Pacific region. Additional ICAO regions
and Member States are expected to implement ADS-B in the future.
(i) EASA AMC 20-24, Certification Considerations for the Enhanced ATS in Non-Radar Areas
using ADS-B Surveillance (ADS-B-NRA) Application via 1090 MHZ Extended Squitter;
(iii) NAV CANADA Aeronautical Information Circular (AIC) 21/09, Air Traffic Flow Management in
the Vicinity of Hudson Bay as a Result of Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast Out
Implementation, for information related to ATC services supported by ADS-B.
Note1 : The certificate holder/operator must provide the appropriate Transport Canada Civil
Aviation (TCCA) office or representative with a copy of the FAA-issued authorization (Op
Spec/M Spec/LOA A353), as appropriate. The certificate holder/operator must also submit
the unique ICAO 24-bit aircraft address to NAV CANADA for each aircraft approved for use in
ADS-B-designated airspace within Canada.
Note2 : NAV CANADA may accept formats other than octal (i.e., hexadecimal or binary) for
the aircraft ICAO 24-bit address. The certificate holder/operator should coordinate with NAV
CANADA for acceptable ICAO 24-bit address formats.
Note 3 : NAV CANADA maintains an aircraft eligibility list of all aircraft approved for ADS-B
services in Canada. Only aircraft with an authorized registration and/or ICAO 24-bit address
will be provided ADS-B services.
(c) Australia-Specific Requirements. All Indian operators wishing to operate in designated ADS-
B airspace within Australia must be in compliance with the following requirements (current
editions):
(i) EASA AMC 20-24, Certification Considerations for the Enhanced ATS in Non-Radar Areas
using ADS-B Surveillance (ADS-B-NRA) Application via 1090 MHZ Extended Squitter; and
(ii) For General Aviation (GA) operators, Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) Civil Aviation
Order (CAO) 20.18, Aircraft Equipment—Basic Operational Requirements; or for certificated
8th Edition 27
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
operators, CASA CAO 82.5, Condition on Air Operators' Certificates Authorising Regular
Public Transport Operations in High Capacity Aircraft.
(i) Singapore: EASA AMC 20-24, Certification Considerations for the Enhanced ATS in ADS-B-
NRA Application via 1090ES; and
(ii) Singapore: AIC 14/10, Introduction to Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast (ADS-B)
Out Service within parts of the Singapore FIR.
Note: The Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) plans to implement ADS-B operations
after 2013 within the Singapore flight information region (FIR). See AIC 14/10 for specific
airways that will require ADS-B.
(i) Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) Requirements. The AFM, Aircraft Flight Manual Supplement
(AFMS), Airplane Operations Manual (AOM), and/or pilot's operating handbook (POH), as
applicable to the specific operator, must be carried in the airplane at all times when ADS-B
Out equipment is installed in accordance with a type certificate (TC) or Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC). The AFM/AFMS/AOM//POH, as applicable, of each aircraft type must
contain a statement that the ADS-B system complies with EASA AMC 20-24 and if deviations
are applicable. Deviations, as stated in AMC 20-24, may be included or referenced. If the
installed ADS-B system is compliant with FAA AC 20-165, as adopted, the appropriate
manuals should indicate that the installation meets the equipment requirements of FAA AC
20-165.
(ii) Flight Operations Manual (FOM) or Equivalent Requirements. The certificate holder/operator
(as applicable) must submit an FOM bulletin or equivalent to the flight crews describing ADS-
B to include:
a) ADS-B system description,
b) Cockpit setup,
c) En route irregular/emergency procedures,
d) Communications,
e) Aircraft statement of compliance to EASA AMC 20-24, and
f) Authorization (see subparagraph D1)).
(iii) Required Flight crew/Dispatch/Flight Follower Training Before being authorized to use the
ADS-B Out equipment, each member of the flight crew operators and the dispatcher/flight
follower shall have completed an approved training program that includes:
a) Use of ADS-B Out equipment,
8th Edition 28
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(iv) Training Verification. The POI must verify that the certificate holder's/operator's training is
accomplished and that the AFM or supplements indicate compliance with EASA AMC 20-24
or FAA AC 20-165, as adopted. The POI must attend at least one full training session for both
the flight crew and flight operations inspectors.
(v) Designation of Aircraft requires specific designation of the aircraft approved for operations
outside of Indian-designated airspace. Aircraft make, model, and series (M/M/S), aircraft
registration number, and aircraft serial number will be automatically populated to reflect the
ADS-B authorization.
(vi) ICAO Regions of Operation. ADS-B Out operations conducted by certificate holders are not
authorized beyond the areas specified in the Operation Specifications.
(i) The POI must determine that the certificate holder/operator understands and complies with all
limitations and conditions associated with applicable STC requirements, parts Manufacturer
Approvals (PMA), and appropriate AFMSs.
(ii) The PAWI and PAI will ensure that the ADS-B system is installed in compliance with the
applicable STC or other appropriate aircraft certification requirements and that the certificate
holder's/operator's maintenance program includes continuing airworthiness and maintenance
personnel training requirements.
(iii) The POI will review the certificate holder/operator procedures for deferral of inoperative
equipment and will coordinate with the PAWI and avionics AWI during the evaluation and
approval of the certificate holder/operator MEL. The POI will also provide the operator with
guidance for revising the existing airplane MEL. ADS-B equipment may not be listed as
"Administrative Control Items" in the MEL.
8th Edition 29
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(iv) The POI must verify that the certificate holder/operator is able to conduct the proposed
operations, and validate that the appropriate training manuals, operations manuals, checklists,
and operating procedures address ADS-B operations.
(v) The certificate holder/operator must provide a listing of the aircraft make and model,
registration number, serial number, and the make and model of the approved ADS-B
equipment.
(vi) After the POI has examined and determined satisfactory all technical details of the application
the authorization for the addition of ADS-B to the Operations Specifications shall be made by
DGCA
2.10.1 HUD and EVS approval will be done as a five phase approval process using OC 18 of
2014 on HUD and EVS approval with job aid in CAP 8200 Annexure 20.
8th Edition 30
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
3.1.1 This chapter contains direction and guidance to be used by DGCA personnel
responsible for the evaluation, approval, and surveillance of commercial operator
crewmember training programs.
3.1.2 An applicant for an Air Operator Permit (AOP)/ AOC is required to develop a training
program for crewmembers and dispatchers which is then specified in OM Part ‘D’. An existing
operator may need to revise its training program when purchasing new equipment, operating
in a new environment, obtaining new authorizations, or when new DGCA requirements are
specified. Each operator must obtain DGCA approval of curriculums used for training
crewmembers, instructors, check airmen, and aircraft dispatchers. The operator is responsible
for ensuring that its training program is complete, current, and in compliance with DGCA
guidance. (Unless otherwise specified in this chapter, the term “operator” applies equally to
an applicant for a permit and an existing permit holder).
3.1.3 A “modular” approach to training is emphasized in this chapter, and categories of
training are defined which are based upon the circumstances for which training is required.
Operations inspectors are responsible for ensuring that regulatory requirements are met and
that the operator’s crewmembers and dispatchers can competently perform their assigned
duties before they are authorized to enter revenue service. Operators should be encouraged
to modify existing training programs to conform to this modular approach and to submit new
programs in conformance with this format. However, it is the policy of the DGCA to encourage
operators to be innovative and creative when developing training curriculums, methods and
techniques. Other formats may be acceptable as long as all training requirements are met.
DEFINITIONS
The following terms are used throughout this chapter and are defined as follows:
8th Edition 31
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
categories of training are initial new-hire, initial equipment, transition, upgrade, recurrent
(periodic), and requalification.
3.2.4 Curriculum: A complete training agenda specific to an aircraft type, a crewmember or
dispatcher duty position, and a category of training. An example is an “initial new-hire, Boeing
737 first inspector curriculum.” Each curriculum consists of several curriculum segments.
3.2.5 Curriculum Segment: The largest subdivision of a curriculum containing broadly
related training subjects and activities based on regulatory requirements. Curriculum
segments are logical subdivisions of a curriculum which can be separately evaluated and
individually approved. Examples are a “ground training” segment and a “flight training”
segment. Each curriculum segment consists of one or more training modules.
3.2.6 Training Module: A subpart of a curriculum segment which constitutes a logical, self-
contained unit. A module contains elements or events which relate to a specific subject. For
example, a ground training curriculum segment could logically be divided into modules
pertaining to aircraft systems (such as hydraulic, pneumatic, and electrical). As another
example, a flight training curriculum segment is normally divided into flight periods, each of
which is a separate module. A training module includes the outline, appropriate courseware,
and the instructional delivery methods. It is usually, but not necessarily, completed in a single
training session.
3.2.7 Element: An integral part of a training, checking, or qualification module that is subject
oriented and not task-oriented. For example, an “electrical power” ground training module may
include such elements as a DC power system, an AC power system, and circuit protection.
3.2.8 Event: An integral part of a training, checking, or qualification module which is task-
oriented and requires the use of a specific procedure or procedures. A training event provides
a student an opportunity for instruction, demonstration, and/or practice using specific
procedures. A checking or qualification event provides an evaluator the opportunity to evaluate
a student’s ability to correctly accomplish a specific task without instruction or supervision.
3.2.9 Checking and Qualification Module: An integral part of a qualification curriculum
segment which contains checking and qualification requirements. For example, a qualification
curriculum segment may contain a proficiency check module, a LOFT module and an
operating experience (qualification) module.
3.2.10 Courseware: Instructional material developed for each curriculum. This is information
in lesson plans, instructor guides, computer software programs, audio-visual programs
workbooks, aircraft operating manuals, and handouts. Courseware must accurately reflect
curriculum requirements, be effectively organized, and properly integrate with instructional
delivery methods.
3.2.11 Instructional Delivery Methods: Methodology for conveying information to a student.
For example, this may include lectures, demonstrations, and audio-visual presentations,
programmed and directed self-study workshops, and drills. Training devices, simulators,
aircraft, and computer work stations are also considered instructional delivery methods.
3.2.12 Testing and Checking: Methods for evaluating students as they demonstrate a
required level of knowledge in a subject, and when appropriate apply the knowledge and skills
learned in instructional situations to practical situations.
8th Edition 32
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
3.2.13 Training Hours: The total amount of time necessary to complete the training required
by a curriculum segment. This must provide an opportunity for instruction, demonstration,
practice, and testing, as appropriate. This time must be specified in hours on the curriculum
segment outline. A training hour includes time for normal breaks, usually 10 minutes each
hour. Lunch breaks are not included.
3.2.14 Programmed Hours: The hours specified for certain categories of training (initial new-
hire, initial equipment, and recurrent). Programmed hours are specified in curriculum segment
outlines in terms of training hours.
3.2.15 Duty Position: The functional or operating position of a crewmember or aircraft
dispatcher. Common duty positions are pilot-in-command (PIC),co- pilot , cabin crew, and
flight dispatcher
3.2.16 Initial Approval: A DGCA letter which conditionally authorizes an operator to begin
instruction to qualify personnel under a specific curriculum or curriculum segment pending an
evaluation of training effectiveness. An initial approval letter must specify an expiration date
for the conditional authorization.
3.2.17 Final Approval: A DGCA letter, without an expiration date, which authorizes an
operator to continue training in accordance with a specific curriculum or curriculum segment.
GENERAL
3.3.1 Requirements for training for performing various types of crew member/ dispatch
duties are given in CARs in Section 7 and 8. These requirements need to be identified in
relation to the specific operations of the operator. The requirements would vary based on the
type of operations (commercial/ general); area of operations (international/ domestic); type of
aircraft etc. The operators is required to draft specific training programs based on these
regulatory requirements and include the same in the Ops Manual Part D. The training
programs would need to include both the flight and ground training requirements.
3.3.2 In the case of operators who intend to outsource all or a portion of the training
requirements, the training program should specify not only the curriculum but also the training
facilities (ATOs/GTOs) intended to be utilised for the training.
3.3.3 Trainee to instructor ratio. The trainee to instructor ratio shall be limited to 25:1.
3.3.4 All training programmes will be documented in Operations Manual Part D and
approved by FSD, DGCA and shall comprise of the following curriculum. The maximum
training hours per day shall be 8 hours. The various types of training required to be undertaken
are: -
8th Edition 33
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
TYPES OF TRAINING
Initial training shall consist of basic knowledge training and applied practical
training. Initial training is required for the persons who have not carried out crew member/
dispatch duties during the preceding 3 years. The goal of initial training is to ensure that each
trainee acquires the competencies, knowledge and skills required to perform the allocated
duties and responsibilities.
Type training is required to gain qualification on the aircraft model and its variants that the
flight crew/ dispatcher will be assigned on and will be part of initial training.
Training for flight crew/ dispatchers who are qualified on the aircraft type, but from a different
operator. This will consist of operator indoctrination covering the operations manual. Such
training is usually termed as Operator Conversion Course. Additionally, applicable recurrent
training shall be carried out prior to application for approval with the new operator. Transition
training may also apply to training accorded to flight crews when transitioning from co-pilot to
PIC duties.
8th Edition 34
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
This category of training is for an employee who has been trained and qualified by the
operator, but has become unqualified to serve in a particular duty position and/or aircraft due
to not having received recurrent training and/or a required flight or competency check within
the appropriate eligibility period.
An operator shall ensure that each crew member/ dispatcher who has not carried out any flight
dispatch duties for more than 3 months but still remains within the period of validity of the
previous Initial/ Type/ Recurrent Training completes refresher training.
The duration of differences training shall depend upon degree of differences between the
different variants of aircraft of the same type used by the operator. Differences training for
variants of a particular type of aircraft may be included in initial, transition, and recurrent
training for the aircraft.
(a) The approval process begins when the operator submits its training proposal in writing, for
initial approval, to the DGCA. The operator is required to submit to the DGCA an outline of
each curriculum or curriculum segment and any additional relevant supporting information
requested by the DGCA. These outlines, any additional supporting information, and a letter
must be submitted to the DGCA. This letter should request DGCA approval of the training
curriculum. Two copies of each curriculum or curriculum segment outline should be forwarded
along with the letter of request to the DGCA.
(b) Each operator must submit its own specific curriculum segment outlines appropriate for its
type of aircraft and kinds of operations. These outlines may differ from one operator to another
and from one category of training to another in terms of format, detail, and presentation. Each
curriculum should be easy to revise and should contain a method for controlling revisions,
such as a revision numbering system. Curriculums for different duty positions may be
combined in one document provided the positions are specifically identified and any
differences in instruction are specified for each duty position. Each curriculum and curriculum
segment outline must include the following information:
(iv) Title of curriculum and/or curriculum segment including the category of training
8th Edition 35
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(c) Each curriculum and curriculum segment must also include the following items, as appropriate:
(i) Prerequisites prescribed by the Indian Aircraft Rules and Regulations or required by the
operator for enrolment in the curriculum
(ii) Statements of objectives of the entire curriculum and a statement of the objective of each
curriculum segment
(iii) A list of each training device, mock-up, system trainer, procedures trainer, simulator, and other
training aids which require DGCA approval (The curriculum may contain references to other
documents in which the approved devices, simulators, and aids, are listed.)
(iv) Descriptions or pictorial displays of normal, abnormal, and emergency manoeuvres and
procedures which are intended for use in the curriculum, when appropriate (These
descriptions or pictorial displays, when grouped together, are commonly referred to as the
flight manoeuvres and procedures document. The operator may choose to present detailed
descriptions and pictorial displays of flight manoeuvres and procedures in other manuals. For
example, the flight manoeuvres and procedures document may be described in an aircraft
operating manual. However, as a required part of the training curriculum, it must either be
submitted as part of the curriculum or be appropriately referenced in the curriculum.)
(v) An outline of each training module within each curriculum segment (Each module should
contain sufficient detail to ensure that the main features of the principal elements or events
will be addressed during instruction.)
(vi) Training hours which will be applied to each curriculum segment and to the total curriculum.
(vii)The checking and qualification modules of the qualification curriculum segment used to
determine successful course completion.
The assigned inspector must review the submitted training curriculum and supporting
information for completeness, general content, and overall quality. A detailed examination of
the documents is not required at this time. If after initial review, the submission appears to be
complete and of acceptable quality, or if the deficiencies are immediately brought to the
operator’s attention and can be quickly resolved, the inspector may begin the in-depth review.
If the submission is determined to be incomplete or obviously unacceptable, the approval
process is terminated and the inspector must immediately return the documents with an
explanation of the deficiencies. The documents must be immediately returned, so the operator
will not erroneously assume the DGCA is continuing the process to the next phase. The
approval process can be resumed when the revised training curriculum or curriculum segment
is resubmitted.
8th Edition 36
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
An applicant for a permit in the early stages of certification may be unable to provide all
information required for its training program. For example, the applicant may not yet know
what training facilities or devices it intends to use. The lack of such information in the formal
application does not necessarily mean that the training curriculum attachment must be
returned. There should be an understanding between the applicant and the inspector that such
portions are missing. The inspector may initiate the in-depth review without this type of
information. Initial approval, however, of a curriculum segment must be withheld until all
portions pertinent to the curriculum segment have been examined. For example, it may be
appropriate to initially approve a ground training curriculum segment even though the
simulator has not yet been evaluated and approved for flight training.
(d) This phase is initiated when the DGCA begins a detailed analysis and evaluation of a training
curriculum or curriculum segment. The purpose of this phase is to determine the acceptability
of training curriculums for initial approval. This phase ends either with the initial approval or
with the rejection of all or part of the training curriculum.
(e) Before granting initial approval for a specific curriculum or curriculum segment, the Inspector
must ensure that the following evaluations are accomplished.
(i) A side-by-side examination of the curriculum outline with the appropriate regulations and with
the direction provided in this manual must be performed. This examination is to ensure that
training will be given in at least the required subjects and in-flight training manoeuvres. It
should also ensure that appropriate training will be given on safe operating practices.
(ii) An examination of the courseware developed or being developed by the operator must be
performed. This review should include a sampling of available courseware such as lesson
plans, audio-visual programs, flight manoeuvres and procedures documents, and student
handouts. The courseware must be consistent with each curriculum and curriculum segment
outline. From this review, the inspector should be able to determine whether the operator is
capable of developing and producing effective training courseware.
(iii) An inspection of training facilities, training devices, and instructional aids (which will be used
to support the training) must be performed if the Inspector is not familiar with the operator’s
training programme capabilities.
(iv) The training hours specified in each curriculum segment outline must be evaluated. An
inspector should not attempt to measure the quality or sufficiency of training by the number of
training hours alone. This can only be determined by direct observation of training and testing
(or checking) in progress, or by examination of surveillance and investigation reports. The
specified training hours must be realistic, however, in terms of the amount of time it will take
to accomplish the training outlined in the curriculum segment so as to achieve the stated
training objectives. During the examination of courseware, an inspector should note the times
8th Edition 37
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
allotted by the operator for each training module. These times should be realistic in terms of
the complexity of the individual training modules. The number of training hours for any
particular curriculum segment depends upon many factors. Some of the primary factors are
as follows:
f) Efficiency and sophistication of the operator’s entire training program (including items such
as instructor proficiency, training aids, facilities, course ware, and the operator’s experience
with the aircraft)
(f) If after completing these evaluations, the inspector determines that the curriculum or
curriculum segment is satisfactory and adequately supported, and that the training hours are
realistic, initial approval should be granted. Sometimes a portion of the submittal may appear
to be satisfactory. However, if that portion is dependent upon another undeveloped portion or
another unsatisfactory portion, initial approval must be withheld. For example, PIC B-737-400
initial equipment, flight training curriculum segment is satisfactory but related training modules
within the initial equipment ground training curriculum segment are unsatisfactory. In such a
case, it may be inappropriate to grant initial approval to the initial equipment slight training
curriculum segment until the ground training curriculum segment is determined to be
satisfactory.
When the Inspector determines that a training curriculum or curriculum segment should be
initially approved, the Inspector must also determine an appropriate expiration date for the
initial approval. The expiration date provides an incentive to the operator for refining all aspects
of the program to assure that this regulatory requirement is met. The expiration date also
provides the DGCA with a time frame with which to plan evaluation activities for determining
the effectiveness of the training. The expiration date assigned to an initially approved training
curriculum must not exceed 24 months from the date of initial approval. The expiration date of
initial approval may be reduced by the DGCA if it is apparent that a 24-month time frame will
unnecessarily delay final approval. The inspector should be aware that shortening the initial
approval expiration date will commit him to completing the final approval phase within the
shorter time period. The inspector may grant final approval any time before the expiration date.
Except when unforeseen circumstances preclude an adequate evaluation of training
effectiveness, an extension to the initial approval expiration date should not be permitted. A
new expiration date, however, may be established for a curriculum segment when there are
significant revisions to an initially- approved curriculum segment.
8th Edition 38
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(a) Initial approval is granted by letter. The initial approval letter must include at least the following
information:
(i) Specific identification of the curriculums and/or curriculum segments initially approved,
including page numbers and revision control dates
(ii) A statement that initial approval is granted, including the effective and expiration dates
(b) An initial approval letter serves as the primary record of curriculum or curriculum segment
pages that are currently approved and effective may agree to use the method to account for
revisions to training documents. If this method is used, the stamp must clearly indicate initial
approval and the expiration date. Other acceptable methods include a list of effective
curriculum or curriculum segment pages, or pages with a pre-printed signature and date
blocks.
(c) The original pages of the curriculum or curriculum segment shall be returned to the operator
with the transmittal letter. These documents should be retained by the operator as an official
record. A copy of the training curriculum or curriculum segment, with a copy of the transmittal
letter granting initial approval attached, shall be maintained on file at the DGCA, along with all
additional, relevant supporting information.
If the Inspector determines that initial approval of a proposed training curriculum or curriculum
segment must be denied, the operator shall be notified in writing of the reasons for denial.
This letter must contain an identification of the deficient areas of the training curriculum and a
statement that initial approval is denied. It is not necessary that each minor deficiency which
resulted in the denial be identified; however the major deficiencies should be outlined in the
letter. It is the operator’s responsibility to redevelop or correct the deficient area before
resubmission to the DGCA. A copy of the denial letter and a copy of the proposed training
curriculum or curriculum segment shall be kept on file in the DGCA.
The final portion of the approval process begins when the operator starts training under the
initially-approved curriculum. This phase should provide the operator with adequate time to
test the program and the flexibility to adjust the program during DGCA evaluation. The
inspector must require an operator to provide ongoing schedules of all training and checking
to be accomplished under an initially-approved training curriculum. Whenever possible, the
first session of training conducted under initial approval should be monitored by a qualified
operations inspector. DGCA inspector does not need to observe every training session. A
sufficient sampling of the training sessions, however, should be observed as a basis for a
realistic evaluation. Inspectors qualified in the type aircraft, and other individuals
8th Edition 39
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
knowledgeable of the curriculum subject matter, should assist in evaluating the training. During
training under initial approval, the operator is expected to evaluate and appropriately adjust
training methods as needed. Often adjustments can be made by changing courseware and
instructional delivery without (or with only minor) revisions to the initially- approved curriculum.
Conversely, it may be necessary for the operator to substantially change the curriculum which
may require another initial approval action by the DGCA before the changes can be put into
effect. Sometimes proposed revisions may be transmitted to the DGCA just before the initial
approval expiration date. If the change is significant, the DGCA may need to establish a
different expiration date for the curriculum segment, or for the revised portions, to allow
adequate time for a proper evaluation.
The Inspector must develop a plan for systematically evaluating training given under the
initially-approved training curriculum. This plan should remain in effect throughout the initial
approval period. There are five elements which can be evaluated when assessing the overall
effectiveness of training programs. These five elements are: curriculum segment outlines,
courseware, instructional delivery methods and training environment, testing and checking,
and surveillance and investigation of operator activities. These elements are interrelated;
however, each can be separately evaluated. See Figure A at the end of this chapter for a
summary of these five elements.
(a) Before evaluating a training program, an inspector must become familiar with the contents of
the curriculums or curriculum segments to be evaluated. This preparation is essential if an
inspector is to determine whether an operator has developed an effective course of instruction
from its initially-approved training curriculum.
(b) Direct examination of courseware includes reviewing materials such as lesson plans,
workbooks, or flight instructor guides. The inspector must determine whether the courseware
is consistent with the curriculum or curriculum segment and that it has been organized to
facilitate effective instructional delivery. Courseware is usually the training program element
which is most adaptable to revision or refinement. Inspectors must review at least sampling of
the courseware.
(c) Direct observation of instructional delivery includes surveillance of training methods, such as
instructor lectures, computer-based instruction presentations, and in-flight instruction.
Effective learning can only occur when an instructor is organized, prepared, and properly uses
the courseware and various training aids. The inspector must determine that the instructional
delivery is consistent with the courseware. For example, the inspector should not whether
the instructor teaches the topics specified in the lesson plan. Training aids and devices should
function as intended during the instructional delivery. In addition, during training, the inspector
should be sensitive to the type of questions being asked by students and should identify the
reasons for any excessive repetition. These conditions may indicate ineffective instructional
delivery or courseware. The inspector must also determine if the instructional environment is
conducive to learning. Distractions which adversely affect instructional delivery, such as
excessive temperatures, extraneous noises, poor lighting, cramped classrooms or work
spaces, are deficiencies because they interfere with learning.
8th Edition 40
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(d) Direct observation of testing and checking is an effective method for determining whether
learning has occurred. Examining the results of tests, such as oral or written tests or flight
checks, provides a quantifiable method for measuring training effectiveness. The Inspector
must examine and determine the causal factors of significant failure trends.
(e) Direct observation of training and checking in progress is an effective method of evaluating
training. Sometimes the opportunity for direct observation, however, will be limited. In such
cases, the Inspector will have to rely more on his evaluation of other sources of information
such as reports of surveillance and investigations. Results of inspection reports, incident or
accident reports, enforcement actions, and other relevant information about the operator’s
performance should be reviewed by the Inspector for indications of training effectiveness. The
Inspector must establish methods to evaluate these sources of information for trends which
may develop while training is being conducted under initial approval. For example, repeated
reports of deficiencies such as excessive taxi speed, navigation deviations, incomplete
briefings, or incorrect use of the checklists, may be traceable to a lack of specific training or
ineffective training. Such information may provide indications that revisions or refinements are
needed for a curriculum segment and/or training modules.
(a) This phase involves the granting of final approval of an operator’s training curriculum. Based
on the results of the evaluation, the DGCA must determine whether to grant or deny final
approval of a training curriculum. This determination must be made before the expiration date
of the initial approval. If the DGCA decides that final approval should be granted, the following
procedures apply:
(i) The original and a copy of the training curriculum and/or curriculum segment shall be stamped
for approval, dated, and signed by the Dy CFOI.
(ii) The original stamped curriculum or curriculum segment must be transmitted to the operator
with an approval letter signed by the DGCA. This letter must specifically identify the curriculum
or curriculum segment; contain a statement that final approval is granted; and provide the
effective date of approval. This letter must also state that final approval shall remain in effect
until otherwise notified by the DGCA that a revision is necessary provided the operator
continues to train in accordance with the approved curriculum. Figure C at the end of this
chapter is an example of a letter of final approval.
3.15.1 To incorporate significant revisions into a training curriculum with final approval usually
requires the full training approval process Revisions to initially- approved training curriculums
will normally be processed as described in paragraphs in the paragraphs 3.5.1 to 3.5.10. Final
approval, however, may be directly granted to a proposed revision, if the revision involves any
of the following situations:
8th Edition 41
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(b) A reorganization of training or any changes in the sequence of training that does not affect the
quality or quantity of training
3.15.2 Other proposed revisions, including any proposal to reduce the approved number of
training hours, are subject to the training program approval process. Although each step in the
process must be completed, the process may be abbreviated in proportion to the complexity
and extent of the proposal. There are many factors that could require revisions to training
curriculums. Such factors include the following:
8th Edition 42
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Figure A
ELEMENTS FOR TRAINING EVALUATION
8th Edition 43
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.1.1 Operators are required to provide enough Instructors to carry out the flight training and
assessments as specified in their approved training programmes. To assist Instructors in line
training duties, the Operator is empowered to authorize Line Training Captains (LTCs)/ Check
Pilots. The DGCA must specifically authorize operator personnel who are to serve as
Instructors after a thorough review of the candidate's background, experience, training, and
competency.
4.2.1 Operator personnel who are to serve as trainers (Instructors, TRIs, SFIs, LTCs and
Check Pilots) must meet the requirements as laid down in CAR Section 7 Series I Part II, Part
III, Part IV or Part IX, as applicable.
TYPES OF INSTRUCTORS
4.3.1 Type Rating Instructor – Simulator (TRI-S). For conduct of simulator and aeroplane
training and checking (other than base training).
4.3.2 Type Rating Instructor - Aeroplane (TRI-A). For conduct of simulator and aeroplane
training and checking.
4.3.3 Synthetic Flight Instructors (SFI). For conduct of simulator training by pilots not holding
current and valid commercial pilot licenses.
4.3.4 Type Rating Instructor – Helicopter (TRI). For conduct of simulator training by pilots
not holding current and valid commercial pilot licenses.
4.4.1 The following sequence of events will be followed for DGCA authorization of
Instructors:
(a) Operator’s Post-holder Training shall forward the names of pilots proposed as Instructors to
FSD, DGCA. Operators, before recommending the names of the pilots, shall subject the pilots
to a process of selection and suitability tests as stipulated in the relevant CAR.
(b) After completion of training the completed records shall be submitted to FSD, DGCA for
authorization as Instructor.
(c) The pilot under consideration for approval as instructor shall be checked for proficiency by
type-trained DGCA Flight Inspector or Examiner appointed by DGCA with FOI on board in
case there is no type trained FOI available for undertaking the check.
8th Edition 44
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(d) The applicant pilot who fails in this test shall not be recommended for such approval for a
minimum period as applicable.
4.5.1 LTCs shall be authorized by the Post-Holder Training of the operator and function
under the operator’s oversight. The pilots trained as LTCs shall be checked for proficiency by
the Scheduled Operator. In case of NSOP/GA on completion of the specified training, the
applicant shall undergo a competency test for Check Pilot on an approved Simulator / Aircraft
by a DGCA Flight Operations Inspector or an Examiner nominated by DGCA with FOI on
board if there is no type trained FOI available for undertaking the check. The pilot who fails in
this test shall not be recommended for such approval for a minimum period as applicable.
4.6.1 SFIs approved for one Operator/ATO may be cross-utilized by another Operator/ATO
with the same type of aeroplane provided an indoctrination course of the respective
Operations Manual/Training and Procedures Manual with minimum duration 8 hours is
conducted followed by a standardization check by the Post-holder Training or his nominated
TRI. Training and duty records will be maintained by both operator/ATO involved in the cross-
utilization. No separate authorization is required by DGCA.
EXERCISE OF PRIVILEGES
(a) An Instructor/ LTC shall exercise his privileges on an aeroplane only when he has a minimum
of 10 hours flying experience as PIC on the type during the preceding 90 days. In case an
Instructor does not meet this requirement, he shall exercise privileges limited to that of an SFI
till he has this recent experience; and
(b) An Instructor/ LTC shall continue to exercise his privileges when he has exercised the
privileges of Instructor/LTC as applicable on the type during the preceding 6 months except
when a pilot is newly authorized on the type. In case an Instructor is not meeting this recent
experience, he shall first exercise his privileges under the supervision of a functional Instructor.
He shall start functioning independently again, only if his proficiency is found satisfactory.
(a) In case any TRI/ Check Pilot is not meeting the recency requirements as in para 4.7.1(a)
above, he can exercise his privileges after undergoing a familiarisation flight on the type,
provided he was regularly flying the group / class of similar aeroplane. Details of such flight
shall be entered in the Examiner’s / Check Pilot’s log book.
8th Edition 45
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.8.1 The purpose of the Instructor evaluation is to ensure that the candidate has achieved
the required skills for briefing, evaluating, and debriefing a pilot being checked. An Instructor
evaluation does not entail an evaluation of the candidate's proficiency in the basic pilot crew
position. An operator should not request authorization of an individual as an Instructor when
there is any question about the pilot's skills in the basic pilot crew position. Should the DGCA
inspector/DE have reason to question the pilot basic crew qualifications, the Instructor
evaluation shall not be conducted until the candidate's qualifications are definitely and
thoroughly verified and accepted. An acceptable means of establishing the pilot basic crew
qualifications is for an inspector to conduct a proficiency, competency or line check of the
Instructor candidate on a separate occasion before the Instructor evaluation. Such checks,
however, are not routinely required.
4.8.2 The following general guidance applies to all Instructor evaluations:
(a) Flight Inspectors/DE assigned to conduct Instructor evaluations must become thoroughly
familiar with the operator's methods and procedures. Inspectors should also become familiar
with the regulatory requirements for the privileges to be exercised by the Instructor candidate.
This familiarity is necessary if the inspector is to make a determination as to whether or not
the Instructor has the ability to conduct training or assessments consistent with the operator's
approved procedures and regulatory requirements.
(b) An inspector/ DE conducting an Instructor evaluation must arrange to meet with the Instructor
candidate in sufficient time for a pre-evaluation briefing. The inspector shall inform the
candidate of the purpose of the evaluation. During the briefing, the inspector should also ask
questions of the candidate to determine if the candidate has a thorough knowledge and
understanding of applicable DGCA regulations, operator policies, methods and procedures,
and of the actions to be taken when acceptable standards are not met.
(c) While the proficiency check is in progress, the inspector/ DE must observe, but should not
interrupt or interfere with the techniques and actions taken by the Instructor candidate. The
inspector must determine if all required events were accomplished and if each event was
properly conducted. The candidate's evaluation of the pilot's performance must be accurate.
The candidate's debriefing of the pilot must be accurate, complete, and constructive.
(d) If the inspector determines that an Instructor candidate does qualify for the requested
authorization the inspector shall inform the candidate that a recommendation of approval will
be reported to the DGCA.
(e) In case of failure of an Instructor candidate, the DGCA may allow a re- evaluation. In such a
case, the operator must conduct sufficient additional training, recertify the candidate's
proficiency and then arrange to have another evaluation conducted by a DGCA inspector.
8th Edition 46
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.9.1 Unless revoked or suspended, the authorization of the Instructor shall remain valid for
a period of five years from the date of issue of authorization so long as the pilots continue to
meet the applicable requirements as per the relevant CAR in Section 7 Series I and remain in
the employment of the operator who has obtained the authorization.
4.9.2 The DGCA authorized Instructors shall be required to undergo assessment of their
continued proficiency in carrying out their privileges as Instructors. Such assessment shall be
carried out in the simulator/ aircraft as a “Instructor Standardization Check” once in two years
by a Designated Examiner of the operator, record of which will be forwarded to FSD.
4.9.3 Renewal of authorization of Instructor shall be accorded after submitting the following
documents by the operators at least three months in advance.
4.9.4 The request will be examined at FSD, and if found satisfactory, a DGCA FOI or
nominated Examiner will assess the proficiency as in Para 4.4(c) above following which the
authorization may be extended for another 5 years.
4.9.5 In case a pilot changes over to a new operator, the new operator may seek renewal of
TRI privileges of a pilot. The privileges can be renewed for the new operator after following
the requirements in Para 4.9.2 above.
4.9.6 A pilot in the scheduled airlines may hold independent yet concurrent appointment as
DE and authorization as Instructor under provisions of CAR Sec 7 Ser I Part I and SEC7 Series
I Part II. Due to limited scope and applicability concurrent approvals are currently only being
given for scheduled operators trainers. The requirements for such appointment or
authorization will be met separately with distinct approval, standardization processes and
validity periods. However, the same is not applicable for other pilots.
(Refer CARs Section 7 Series I Parts II, III and IV and Ops Circular 2 OF 2013)
4.10.1 Policy. Privileges granted to a pilot as an Instructor may be withdrawn by the DGCA if
the pilot is found lacking in any of the requirements. Post Holder Training of the Operator/ ATO
may also recommend to the DGCA, withdrawal of privileges as Instructor in respect giving
adequate justification.
4.10.2 Instructor privileges may be withdrawn by the DGCA, in part or in whole, for due cause.
In these cases, the DGCA Flight Standards Directorate will issue a written notification of
withdrawal of privileges to the Instructor concerned, and also inform the applicable Operator/
ATO. Where there is an immediate threat to safety, this privilege will be withdrawn
immediately. The DGCA may withdraw an Instructor’s authority if evidence shows that an
Instructor has:
8th Edition 47
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(a) At any time, acts in a manner which is in contravention of the guidelines contained in the
relevant CAR in Section 7 Series I;
(b) Failed to follow the applicable instructions to maintain the required standards, or to follow
proper procedures;
(d) Fraudulently misused Instructor authority, or acted in any other way that would discredit the
DGCA
(f) During the course of a Proficiency Check, Skill Test or Standardization Check failed to meet
the required DGCA Standards. The Instructor will be informed verbally, immediately upon
completion of the Proficiency Check or Skill Test, or the Inspector may stop the check at the
time an overall failure is awarded.
(g) The DGCA may withdraw an Instructor/ Check Pilot’s approval for if evidence shows that a
Instructor/ Check Pilot has:
(h) Placed a personal interest, or the interest of the company, ahead of the interest of the DGCA
and the travelling public;
(i) Fraudulently misused Instructor/ Check Pilot authority, or acted in any other way that would
discredit the DGCA;
4.10.3 Except where there is an immediate threat to safety, the DGCA, prior to making a final
decision in the matter of withdrawal of an Instructor’s authority, shall ensure the matter has
been investigated thoroughly; and the Instructor and, where applicable, the concerned
Operator, have been given a formal opportunity to respond to the allegations, either verbally
or in writing.
4.10.4 Procedure for Withdrawal of Instructor’s Privileges. The following steps shall be
followed when withdrawing the approval of an Instructor:-
(a) Except in the case of an immediate threat to safety, upon receipt of evidence demonstrating
grounds for withdrawal of approval the CFOI shall notify the Instructor and the Operator/ ATO,
if applicable, in writing of the pending investigation and the alleged grounds for withdrawal.
The Instructor and the Operator/ ATO shall be provided an opportunity to respond to the
evidence. The CFOI shall conduct the formal investigation and consider the facts provided by
the Instructor and the Operator(s).
8th Edition 48
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(b) In the case of an immediate threat to safety, the DGCA may immediately withdraw approval
and conduct a formal investigation after the withdrawal.
(c) At the completion of the formal investigation, the CFOI will make a determination whether to
recommend withdrawal of approval. If the CFOI determines that withdrawal is warranted, the
CFOI will make a recommendation for withdrawal to the JDG. If the CFOI determines that
withdrawal is not warranted, the CFOI shall notify the Instructor in writing of the determination.
(d) After considering the recommendation for withdrawal, the JDG or DG will approve or reject
the CFOI’s recommendation. Upon receiving the decision from the JDG or DG, the CFOI will
issue written notification of results of the investigation and the withdrawal of approval, if
applicable.
4.11.1 The validity and renewal of LTC authorization and standards required to be maintained
by the LTC are the responsibility of the operator. Refer applicable CAR Section 7 Series I.
GROUND INSTRUCTORS
4.12.1 A Ground Instructor is a person employed by an Operator or training centre for the
purpose of training flight crewmembers in an operator's approved training curriculum. These
instructors provide the required training for flight crewmembers to ensure that the acceptable
standards of knowledge and the necessary skills to complete a particular curriculum segment
are met. When designated by the employer, an instructor is responsible for certifying to the
knowledge and proficiency of each crewmember upon completion of a training curriculum or
curriculum segment. Instructors must be knowledgeable in the applicable DGCA requirements
and in the operator's required policies and procedures applicable to each designated area of
expertise. An instructor must possess effective communicative skills. An instructor's manner
should reflect honesty and professionalism, and the instructor must exhibit a positive attitude
toward safe aviation practices.
4.12.2 Criteria for approval of ground instructors are given in CAR Section 7 Series I Part VII.
Through periodic inspections of operator training programmes as described in Volume 3 of
this Manual, the DGCA Operator will ensure ground instructor competency, uniform methods
of presentation, and compliance with approved Training Syllabi.
8th Edition 49
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
5.1.1 Operators are required to provide enough Examiners to carry out the checks as
specified in their approved Training Programmes The DGCA specifically appoints operator
personnel who are to serve as Designated Examiners (DEs)/ Synthetic Flight Examiners
(SFEs) or Examiners after a thorough review of the candidate's background, experience,
training, and competency. . DEs and SFEs are appointed under provisions of CAR Section 7
Series I Part I whilst Examiners are appointed under provisions of CAR Section 7 Series I
Parts III and IV for aeroplanes and helicopters respectively.
5.1.2 The details for appointment and functioning of DEs/ SFEs is covered in the DE Manual
(CAP 7200). This Chapter deals with the policies and procedures for Examiners for non-
scheduled, GA and helicopter operators.
5.2.1 Operator personnel who are to serve as Examiners must meet the requirements as
laid down in CAR Section 7 Series I Part III, IV for Non-Scheduled, GA and Helicopter
Operators.
5.3.1 The process as stipulated in respective CARs as in Para 5.1.1 above will apply.
5.4.1 The purpose of the Examiner evaluation is to ensure that the candidate has achieved
the required skills for briefing, evaluating, and debriefing a pilot being checked. An Examiner
evaluation does not entail an evaluation of the candidate's proficiency in the basic pilot crew
position. An operator should not request appointment of an individual as an Examiner when
there is any question about the pilot's skills in the basic pilot crew position. Should the DGCA
inspector have reason to question the pilot basic crew qualifications, the Examiner evaluation
shall not be conducted until the candidate's qualifications are definitely and thoroughly verified
and accepted. An acceptable means of establishing the pilot basic crew qualifications is for an
inspector to conduct a proficiency, competency, or line check of the Examiner candidate on a
separate occasion before the Examiner evaluation. Such checks, however, are not routinely
required.
5.4.2 The following general guidance applies to all Examiner evaluations:
(a) Flight Inspectors assigned to conduct Examiner evaluations must become thoroughly familiar
with the operator's methods and procedures.
8th Edition 50
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(b) Inspectors should also become familiar with the regulatory requirements for the functions to
be exercised Instructor candidate. This familiarity is necessary if the inspector is to make a
determination as to whether or not the Examiner has the ability to conduct checks consistent
with the operator's approved procedures and regulatory requirements.
(c) An inspector conducting an Examiner evaluation must arrange to meet with the Examiner
candidate in sufficient time for a pre-evaluation briefing. The inspector shall inform the
candidate of the purpose of the evaluation. During the briefing, the inspector should also ask
questions of the candidate to determine if the candidate has a thorough knowledge and
understanding of applicable DGCA regulations, operator policies, methods and procedures,
and of the actions to be taken when acceptable standards are not met.
(d) While the standardization check is in progress, the inspector must observe, but should not
interrupt or interfere with the techniques and actions taken by the Examiner candidate. The
inspector must determine if all required events were accomplished and if each event was
properly conducted. The candidate's evaluation of the pilot's performance must be accurate.
The candidate's debriefing of the pilot must be accurate, complete, and constructive.
(e) If the inspector determines that an Examiner candidate does qualify for the requested
appointment the inspector shall inform the candidate that a recommendation of approval will
be reported to the DGCA.
(f) In case of failure of an Examiner candidate, the DGCA may allow a re- evaluation. In such a
case, the operator must conduct sufficient additional training, recertify the candidate's
proficiency, and then arrange to have another evaluation conducted by a DGCA inspector
5.6.1 Policy. The appointment of a Examiner may be withdrawn by the DGCA if the pilot is
found lacking in any of the requirements. Besides, a Board consisting of the Chief of
Operations and Chief of Training of the operator may also recommend to the DGCA,
withdrawal of appointment as Examiner in respect of any pilot giving adequate justification.
5.6.2 Examiner appointment may be withdrawn by the DGCA, in part or in whole, for due
cause. In these cases, the DGCA Flight Standards Directorate will issue a written notification
of withdrawal of appointment to the Examiner concerned, and also inform the applicable
Operator(s). Where there is an immediate threat to safety, this appointment will be withdrawn
immediately. The DGCA may withdraw an Examiner’s appointment if evidence shows that an
Examiner has:
(a) At any time, acts in a manner which is in contravention of the guidelines contained in this CAR;
8th Edition 51
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(b) Placed a personal interest, or the interest of the company, ahead of the interest of the DGCA
and the travelling public;
(d) Failed to follow the applicable instructions to maintain the required standards, or to follow
proper procedures;
(e) Fraudulently misused Examiner authority, or acted in any other way that would discredit the
DGCA;
(h) During the course of a Proficiency Check, or DE Standardization Check, failed to meet the
required DGCA Standards.
(i) Exercised poor judgment in assessing a candidate’s performance, in relation to the standards
contained herein; or
(k) Except where there is an immediate threat to safety, the DGCA, prior to making a final decision
in the matter of withdrawal of an Examiner’s appointment, shall ensure the matter has been
investigated thoroughly; and the Examiner and, where applicable, the concerned Operator,
have been given a formal opportunity to respond to the allegations, either verbally or in writing.
5.6.3 Procedure. The following steps shall be followed when withdrawing the appointment
of an Examiner;
(a) Except in the case of an immediate threat to safety, upon receipt of evidence demonstrating
grounds for withdrawal of appointment the CFOI shall notify the Examiner and the Operator(s),
if applicable, in writing of the pending investigation and the alleged grounds for withdrawal.
The Examiner and the Operator(s) shall be provided an opportunity to respond to the
evidence. The CFOI shall conduct the formal investigation and consider the facts provided by
the Examiner and the Operator(s). In the case of an immediate threat to safety, the DGCA
may immediately withdraw appointment and conduct a formal investigation after the
withdrawal.
(b) At the completion of the formal investigation, the CFOI will make a determination whether to
recommend withdrawal of appointment. If the CFOI determines that withdrawal is warranted,
the CFOI will make a recommendation for withdrawal to the JDG. If the CFOI determines that
withdrawal is not warranted, the CFOI shall notify the Examiner in writing of the determination.
(c) After considering the recommendation for withdrawal, the JDG or DG will approve or reject
the CFOI’s recommendation. Upon receiving the decision from the JDG or DG, the CFOI will
8th Edition 52
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
issue written notification Examiner concerned, and also inform the applicable Operator(s), of
the results of the investigation and the withdrawal of appointment, if applicable.
OVERSIGHT OF EXAMINERS
5.7.1 The DGCA shall monitor the standards of all Examiners by:
(a) Monitoring each Examiner while he conducts a Skill Test or Proficiency Check every 12
months - this check shall be referred to as the DE Standardization Check.;
• his conduct of Checks is fair and in conformance with the standards and procedures described
in this manual;
• Completion of the Examiner Standardization Report, retaining of records, and updating the
Operator's Examiner file.
(b) Standardization checks will be done as per two year cycles under which the approvals were
issued for individual trainers. For Examiners, the standardization will be done as a proficiency
check in the simulator. Case by case basis approval may be given by DGCA to conduct this
check in an aeroplane when a type simulator is not available.
(c) Withdrawal of Examiners will be subject to the policy and procedure as per Para 5.6 above.
8th Edition 53
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
INTRODUCTION
6.1.1 Approval of training organisations will be done in accordance with CAR Section 7
Series D Part. IV and CAP 7100.
6.1.2 Apart from the approval and inspection process, surveillance of ATOs/ATRP will be
carried out on an annual basis to ensure that these organisations continue to comply with the
standards based on which approval was given. The checklist for surveillance is included in
CAP 8200 Annexure 19.
6.1.3 If any ATO/ATRP does not meet these requirements, then FSD, DGCA will issue a
letter suspending the approval immediately. Re-approval of the TO will be in accordance with
CAR Section 7 Series D Part IV, Part V and CAP 7100.
OVERSIGHT
6.2.1 DGCA shall maintain an effective oversight programme of the ATO to ensure
continuing compliance with the approval requirements. The oversight programme may be
integrated with the operator’s training programme annual inspection.
6.2.2 The oversight programme should also check the ground instructor approval process,
quality of the questions in the question bank of the operator and the number of revisions to
question bank, based on changes in the manufacturer documents.
6.2.3 Policy on conflict of interest should be checked.
6.2.4 Policy on qualification and approval of personnel for setting and vetting the question
bank used for evaluating students in ground subjects. Guidelines to personnel for setting and
vetting the question bank should also be checked.
8th Edition 54
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
GENERAL
7.1.1 Approval of Airline Type Rating Programme (ATRP) will be done in accordance with
CAR Section 7 Series D Part V. Apart from the approval and inspection process, surveillance
of ATRP will be carried out on an annual basis to ensure that these organisations continue to
comply with the standards based on which approval was given.
7.2.1 The operator shall have a minimum fleet of five aeroplanes for the type proposed to be
included in the ATRP. For operators with an approved ATRP on one type of aeroplane, the
requirement of a minimum fleet of 5 aeroplanes for another type may be met by an order of
the additional type without the aeroplanes being held on strength at time of inclusion of the
additional type in the ATRP.
7.2.2 The operator shall have completed minimum 1 year of operations with at least one
training audit cycle completed by DGCA.
7.2.3 The operator shall have a minimum of 4 approved ground instructors for each
aeroplane type proposed to be included in the ATRP of which a minimum of 2 performance
and 2 technical instructors each, minimum of 4 approved instructors/designated examiners of
which 2 shall be SFI/TRIs and 2 shall be DEs for the aeroplane type proposed to be included
in the ATRP.
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
7.3.1 A scheduled operator may carry out type rating for pilots employed by it through an
ATRP or an ATO. The Operator’s Conversion Course (OCC) required by CAR Section 8
Series F Part II may be integrated with the ATRP without the need to conduct this separately
as in the case when the type rating is carried out in an ATO.
SCOPE OF ATRP
(a) Ground training and examination by the operator’s approved ground instructors.
Note: Training and checking under the ATRP shall be in accordance with the type rating
syllabus approved by FSD, DGCA.
8th Edition 55
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
APPROVAL OF ATRP
7.5.1 DGCA shall inspect and approve the ATRP of an operator prior to the implementation
of such training. The approval shall be documented as part of the Operations Manual Part D
approval.
7.5.2 The issuance of an ATRP approval for an operator and the continued validity of the
approval shall depend upon the operator being in compliance with the requirements of the
CAR.
RECORDS
7.6.1 The operator shall retain detailed student records to show that all requirements of the
training course have been met as approved by the DGCA.
7.6.2 The operator shall maintain a system for recording the qualifications and training of
instructional and examining staff, where appropriate.
7.6.3 The records required by Para 7.6.1 shall be kept for a minimum period of three years
after completion of the training. The records required by Para 7.6.2 shall be retained for a
minimum period of three years after the instructor or examiner ceases to perform a function
for the operator.
OVERSIGHT
7.7.1 DGCA shall maintain an effective oversight programme of the ATRP to ensure
continuing compliance with the approval requirements. The oversight programme may be
integrated with the operator’s training programme annual inspection.
7.7.2 If any ATRP does not meet these requirements, then FSD, DGCA will issue a letter
suspending the approval immediately.
7.7.3 The oversight programme should also check the ground instructor approval process,
quality of the questions in the question bank of the operator and the number of revisions to
question bank, based on changes in the manufacturer documents.
7.7.4 Policy on conflict of interest should be checked.
7.7.5 Policy on qualification and approval of personnel for setting and vetting the question
bank used for evaluating students in ground subjects. Guidelines to personnel for setting and
vetting the question bank should also be checked.
8th Edition 56
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
PURPOSE
8.1.1 The purpose of this Chapter is to provide guidance to operations inspector to approve
the use of Flight Training Devices (FTDs) and Full Flight Simulators (FFSs) for use in air
operator training operations. This process ensures the Flight Simulation Training Device
(FSTD) operator’s manual includes policies, procedures, instructions and information
necessary to ensure that aeroplane simulators, training devices and training aids meet the
requirements of its DGCA Approved Training Programme.
OBJECTIVE
8.2.1 To determine if the FTD or FFS meets the minimum standards to be used at Level 4,
5, or 6 for FTDs or A, B, C or D for FFSs.
8.2.2 To identify any shortfalls in the FTD or FFS in terms of required functionality, capability
and operating environment.
SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS
8.3.1 To properly complete this FSTD Use Approval Job Aid in CAP 8200 annexure, the
Inspector should have a basic understanding of the FTD and FSS approval process, which is
described in detail in OC 15 of 2014 Flight Training Device (FTD) And Full Flight Simulator
(FFS) Qualification CAR Sec 7 Series D Part VI. This job aid, which should be utilized for each
FTD and FFS intended for use in air operator training operations, is placed at Annex 21.
8th Edition 57
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
INTRODUCTION
9.1.1 ICAO specifies that the fundamental responsibility for the operation of an aircraft lies
with the State of Registry. However, special conditions may arise as a result of aircraft leasing
or interchange agreements between an operator and an operator or leasing company in
another State. Unless suitable arrangements are made, complex legal, safety, and
enforcement problems may be created for both the State of Registry and State of the Operator.
It is therefore, essential that agreement is reached on two key issues:
(a) Which State's regulations are to be applied and which State is responsible for the safe
operation and airworthiness of the aircraft.
(b) Which operator (lessor or lessee) is responsible for the day to day operational control of the
leased aircraft
CAP 3200
9.2.1 Lease and interchange is covered in CAP 3200 Aircraft Leasing Manual and the FOI
shall refer to this manual for guidance on procedures for lease and interchange.
8th Edition 58
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1. General
1.1 Compliance with Aircraft Rules, 1937 and Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR) is
mandatory. Occasionally, there may be situations where it may not be possible to comply with
the provisions of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 and directions given in the CARs, because of
exceptional circumstances, physical constraints, non-availability of specified equipment etc.
which may warrant exemptions from the provisions of Rules and directions of CARs.
1.2 MoCA Order No. A-60015/40/2015-DG dated 30.12.2021 stipulates the requirements
for the application and the procedure for granting of exemptions for non-compliance of the
provisions of Aircraft Rules, 1937 under Rule 160 including grant of exemption by the Director
General from the specific provisions of rules 38B, 41, 47A, 49B, 53, 58, 60, 61, 111 and 158A
of the Aircraft Rules, 1937.
1.3 Further, CAR Section 1 Series B Part III stipulates the requirements for application for
grant of exemptions for non-compliance of directions of Civil Aviation Requirements.
1.4 This chapter lays down the procedures to be followed by the officers of FSD for
processing the applications for grant of exemptions from the provisions of the Aircraft Rules,
1937 and the directions under Civil Aviation Requirements.
Note: The term “exemptions” also includes exceptions, deviations and prolonged extensions.
1.6.1 Both, the Central Government and the Director-General are vested with the power to
issue exemptions from operations/ application of rule(s) of the Aircraft Rules, 1937. The
general power of exemption from any rule(s) vests with the Central Government under rule
160 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, whereas, the Director-General is specifically empowered
under some specific rules such as rules 38B, 41, 47A, 49B, 53, 58, 60, 61, 111 and 158A of
the Aircraft Rules, 1937, to grant exemptions from application of these rule(s). Inter alia,
some of these power(s) of Director-General have been further delegated to officers of
Directorate General of Civil Aviation under S.O. 726 dated 04.10.94.
8th Edition 59
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1.6.3 The detailed procedure for granting exemption by Central Government under
rule 160 and by the Director-General including the officers so delegated under above
referred specific rules, has been specified by the Central Government vide MoCA Order
No. A-60015/40/2015-DG dated 30.12.2021.
1.7.1 The Director-General is empowered to issue special directions under rule 133A
of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, through publication titled ‘Civil Aviation Requirements’. Sub-
rule (4) of rule 133A of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, empowers Director-General with the power
to issue exemptions from the provisions of Civil Aviation Requirements (CARs).
1.7.2 The detailed procedure for granting exemptions for non-compliance with Civil
Aviation Requirements (CARs) has been specified by the Director-General under CARs
Section 1 Series B Part III.
2. References:
3. Definitions:
3.1 Temporary Exemptions: where the non-compliance is expected to be removed and inter-
operability is the predominant aspect of the requirement.
4.1 An application from person/ organization seeking exemption from Aircraft Rules and/or
CAR, in the prescribed proforma of the above Order/CARs, is submitted to FSD along with
supporting documents justifying the reason for seeking exemption.
8th Edition 60
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
i. For temporary exemption, the action plan for rectification and review of non-
compliance, including the mitigation measures adopted for ensuring the safety
during the exemption period:
ii. For permanent exemption, the mitigation measures adopted to ensure safety of
aircraft operation/ reduce risk arising due to non-compliance. (Complete safety
assessment report shall be enclosed.)
i) An action plan for rectification, the safety assessment, and review of non-compliance,
including the mitigation measures adopted for ensuring the safety during the exemption
period.
j) Undertaking by the person/ organization that the exemptions will be periodically
(Quarterly/Half Yearly/Annually or as directed by DGCA) review the conditions or
mitigation measures and any other resultant non-compliance in particular when any
significant changes in the activity are proposed.
4.3 After technical evaluation and on being satisfied that the exemption can be granted, the
application seeking exemption either from such rules of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, wherein
Director-General is empowered to grant exemption or from the provision(s) of any CAR, shall
be forwarded by FSD to the Directorate of Regulation & Information (DRI) specifying the rule
from which the exemption is being processed.
4.4 The Directorate of Regulation and Information will examine the proposal to determine
as to whether the grant of such specific exemption by the Director General may amount to
exemption of any rule(s) for which only Central Government is empowered to grant exemption
under rule 160. After this examination, if it is determined that the exemption proposed does
not fall under the exemption from rule 160 then FSD shall submit the case for grant of
exemption on file along with conditions/ limitations, if any, for the approval of the Director-
General or any other officer empowered to grant such exemption.
4.5 In case it is determined that the exemption sought would be exemption from any such rule
for which only Central Government is empowered to grant exemption under Rule 160, then
the proposal will be processed on file as per the procedure prescribed in MoCA Order No. A-
60015/40/2015-DG dated 30.12.2021 and the proposal of exemption will be forwarded to the
MOCA along with the observations/recommendations on the basis of technical evaluation and
after taking the approval of Director-General.
8th Edition 61
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.6 Before recommending for grant of exemption, it shall be ascertained by FSD that an
equivalent level of safety shall be maintained in case the exemption is so granted. The
recommendation for allowing temporary exemptions shall not exceed one year and may
contain conditions/ limitations for the person/ organization to follow while operating under the
exemption.
4.7 The recommendations for a permanent exemption shall require identification of mitigation
measures based on the safety risk assessment carried out, to reduce the risk arising due to
non-compliances.
4.8 Exemptions shall be recorded in the relevant manual(s) approval and shall also be subject
to surveillance to ensure compliance with the mitigation measures adopted.
4.9 The application for exemption may be refused which do not have adequate justification for
non-compliance and adequate action plan for mitigation of the identified safety risk. The
applicant concerned will be intimated accordingly.
4.10 If an exemption so granted leads to non-compliance with ICAO Annex Standard and
Recommended Practices (SARPs), then the aircraft, certificate holders, or licensed persons
should normally be permitted for domestic operations only. In case international operations
can be permitted, the exemption holder would be required to take prior permission of the State
or States, whose territory is/being entered. The exemption letter so issued shall include either
of the following conditions:
Or
International operations under this exemption can only be undertaken with prior
permission of the State or States whose territory the operation is proposed.
4.11 FSD will ensure that the exemption holder reviews the exemption(s) to the extent
possible with a view to assess the need for continuation or removal of such exemption(s).
During such review the exemption holder check the validity and robustness of any mitigating
measures in place. After every such review, the exemption holder shall submit a report to the
concerned directorate.
Exemptions under Rule 160 can only be granted by the Central Government. After
technical evaluation and recommendation of the Director-General, the application shall be
forwarded to the MOCA along with condition/ limitations, if any, by FSD as per the procedure
as detailed in para 4. However, there will be no requirement of submitting the proposal to
Directorate of Regulations and Information for vetting.
6. Grant of Exemption by the Director-General under specific Rules other than Rule
160
8th Edition 62
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Exemptions under specific rules 38B, 41, 47A, 49B, 53, 58, 60, 61, 111 and 158A of
the Aircraft Rules, 1937, i.e. exemptions other than rule 160, shall be granted by the Director-
General or by officers delegated with such authority under S.O. 726(E), after following the
procedure as detailed in para 4.
Exemptions from CAR(s) under Sub-rule (4) of rule 133A of the Aircraft Rules, 1937,
shall be processed by FSD as per the procedure detailed in para 4 including vetting by
Directorate of Regulations & Information and the exemption shall be granted by the Director-
General.
8. Follow up actions
a) The exemption if permanent in nature, once approved, shall be included in the relevant
manuals such as Operations Manual.
b) On receipt of request by the holder of the exemption, for removal of the exemption, the same
shall be reviewed, compliance confirmed and on being satisfied, the exemption shall be
deleted from the relevant manual(s).
a) All records pertaining to exemptions granted shall be maintained by the respective Directorate.
b) The FSD shall ensure that permanent exemptions and temporary exemptions of duration
exceeding six months are published on DGCA website.
8th Edition 63
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
INTRODUCTION
Compliance with CARs is not optional. Occasionally, however, there may be situations where
it may not be possible to comply with the directions given in the CARs /CAPs because of
exceptional circumstances, physical constraints, non- availability of specified equipment etc.
which may warrant exemptions from the CARs/ CAPs However such deviation would be an
exception and not the norm. To cater to such circumstances, sub-rule (4) of Rule 133A of the
Aircraft Rules, 1937 provides Director-General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) the power to exempt
any aircraft or class of aircraft or any person or class of persons from the direction(s) given in
CARs, either wholly or partially,
PROCEDURE FOR SEEKING EXEMPTIONS is laid down in CAR Section 1 Series B Part III,
Under which a person/ organization seeking exemption shall submit separate application for
exemption(s) to a CAR in the prescribed proforma to DGCA (Appendix).The application for
exemption shall clearly state the reasons with full justification for seeking exemption and be
supported with the reasons for non-compliance, safety assessment reports, along with means
of mitigation and clear indication as to when compliance can be expected with full
documentation.
In all cases, before granting exemption, it shall be ascertained that an equivalent level of safety
shall be maintained.
DGCA may refuse requests for exemptions which do not have adequate justification for non-
compliance.
Action plan for rectification, including the safety assessment and mitigation measures adopted
for ensuring the safety, mitigation measures, including the safety assessment proposed to be
adopted to ensure safety of aircraft operation is of vital importance.
Note: This tool kit is prepared by keeping all the essential requirements which deem to
be of utmost important before such exemption is granted.
The safety risk assessment is a Process to identify actual and potential safety hazards and
assess the associated risks; Safety risk management: the identification, analysis and
elimination (and/or mitigation to an acceptable or tolerable level) of the hazards, as well as the
subsequent risks, that threaten the viability of an organization. (ICAO Doc. 9859)
Safety risk Assessment is a careful examination of what, in your work, could cause harm, so
that you can weigh up whether you have taken enough precautions, or should do more to
prevent harm. Safety risk Assessment (SRA) is a key component of an SMS and involves two
fundamental safety-related activities:
8th Edition 64
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
2. Assessing the risks and mitigating them (reducing the potential of those risks to cause
harm).
GUIDANCE TO INSPECTORS
NOTE: if the answer to any of above items is no: then involve your colleague FOI.
8th Edition 65
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
8th Edition 66
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Inspector involved and participants need to brainstorm the types of safety hazards they think
may threaten the safety of passengers, employees or contractors. The group should also
consider those hazards which could damage equipment, or harm the environment. For
example, for flight crew, fuel exhaustion would be a hazard that could result in the loss of both
an aircraft and its passengers. For maintenance engineers, fatigue might be a hazard during
night shift operations.
There may also be systemic hazards – organizational factors that could result in safety related
issues. These hazards include: insufficient training; lack of policies or procedures; and people
not following these policies or procedures.
Assess the hazards critically. Factors to consider are the likelihood (how often the hazard
might result in a safety occurrence), and the severity (how bad the outcome would be) of any
consequences. For example, a serious in-flight fire might be an unlikely occurrence, but it
would be catastrophic if it were to occur. It would rank above a bird strike which, although
much more likely to occur, tends to be less severe. Keep the process simple and get global
views about how significant an issue the hazard really is, in the context of all the hazards
identified.
Once you list the hazards and rank their order of risk, you should identify possible defences
(hazard controls) against them. One defence against an in-flight fire is a fire extinguisher; a
defence against aircraft fuel contamination is correct fuel filtration procedures and regular fuel
testing. This step should provide a list of current controls/defences against each hazard: some
controls will defend against multiple hazards.
How effective is each hazard control/defense? Would the control prevent the occurrence (i.e.
does it remove the hazard?), or just minimize the likelihood or the consequence? You can
determine how effective a hazard control is by asking, for example: ‘Does the crew know how
to use the fire extinguishers, and are the extinguishers correctly maintained?’ You will then
have a list of effective controls, as well as a list of which controls need improvement.
Examine each hazard and its control/s to determine whether the risk is adequately managed
or controlled. If it is, the operation can continue. If not, consider how to improve the hazard
control, or to remove or avoid the hazard entirely. For example, you could provide recurrent
training for crew in the correct use of fire extinguishers.
You should manage the risk to a point of ALARP—as low as reasonably practicable.
In some instances, there could be a range of solutions to manage a risk. Typically, some are
engineering solutions (e.g. redesign), which, although probably the most effective, may also
be expensive. Others involve control (e.g. operating procedures) and personnel (e.g. training)
and might be less costly. The solution need not be costly to be effective.
8th Edition 67
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
The term risk refers to the chance that somebody could be harmed by various hazards,
together with an indication of how serious the harm could be.
Risk management is an integral component of safety management and involves five essential
steps:
You can ask an advisor to help you. If you are not confident, ask someone competent for
advice. In all cases, you should make sure that you involve your colleagues. They will have
useful information about how the work is done that will make your risk assessments more
thorough and effective.
8th Edition 68
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Work out how safe operations could be harmed. The hazard identification methods already
mentioned are a good start.
»» Involve your colleagues they may have noticed things that are not immediately obvious to
you.
»» Review previous safety occurrences and maintenance errors. These will help in
understanding risks and their potential Likelihood and consequences.
Don’t overcomplicate the process. You should already have a good idea of the risks and of
any control measures that you can easily apply. Example: One of the safety concerns for air
transport operators is incorrect loading of passengers or freight on the aircraft, which can lead
to accidents.
Step 2: Decide what might be harmed and how the harm might be caused
For each hazard you need to be clear about what might cause harm. This will then help you
identify the best way to manage the risk. That doesn’t mean listing everyone by name, but
rather identifying groups of people (e.g. flight crew, cabin crew and passengers).
In each case, you should identify what might occur. You will also need to identify the possible
reasons (root causes) of the hazard.
Take into account any current mitigation measures and assess the severity in terms of the
worst possible realistic scenario.
Likelihood of occurrence
Take into account any current mitigation measures and assess the likelihood/probability of the
risk occurring.
8th Edition 69
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
The Inspector will re-enter the results into the safety report and hazard log.
Use the risk tolerability matrix to assess how tolerable the risk is using the results obtained
from the assessment of the consequences and likelihood.
8th Edition 70
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
The FOI will enter the results into the hazard register: Refer SSP Circular 1 of
2012.
Having analyzed the identified the hazards, you then have to decide what to do about them.
You must ‘do everything reasonably practicable’ to analyze the mitigation measures of the
risks of identified . Examine what you are already doing. Think about what controls are in place
and how the work is organised. Then compare this with good practice and see if there is more
needs to be done to bring it up to standard. Ask yourself:
»» Is there a less risky option? Prevent access to the hazard? Reduce exposure to the hazard?
Improving safety need not cost an enormous amount. For instance, placing a mirror on a
dangerous blind corner of the airport apron to help prevent vehicle accidents is a low-cost
precaution, considering the risks. Failure to take simple precautions can be much more costly
if an accident does happen.
Evaluate risk level – An important task in analysing risk is to determine the risk level based
on its likelihood and consequence.
»» The likelihood of the event occurring based on exposure and repetition (how often the task
is performed, such as cycles of aircraft maintenance, base training of the pilots etc.)
8th Edition 71
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
A simple way to determine the likelihood is to rank the hazard based on its potential frequency
of occurrence. This can be done on a simple five-point scale, from ‘rare’ to ‘almost certain’.
Consequence is the potential impact or outcome that may result from the hazard. This can
range from insignificant to catastrophic.
Decide on precautions – Once you determine the risk levels, assess the safety defences or
controls in place to work out how effective they are against the hazard or hazardous event.
Having assessed the risk and the defences in place, decide how to implement your risk
management plans. You may avoid the risk, accept the risk in order to pursue an opportunity,
remove the risk, or share the risk with another party.
Putting the results of your risk assessment into practice will make a difference when looking
after people and your judgment.
Record the results of your risk assessment and share them with your colleagues. It is important
to document what you have done so that you can review it at a later date if anything changes.
A risk assessment does not have to be perfect, but it must be suitable and sufficient. You need
to be able to show that:
»» you dealt with all the significant hazards, taking into account the number of people who
could be involved
If, as in many organizations, you find that there are a number of improvements to be made,
both large and small, do not try to do everything at once. Make a plan of action to deal with
the most significant risks first. Inspectors acknowledge the efforts of aviation organizations
that are clearly trying to make improvements.
However, you cannot continue operations if a risk is assessed as ‘intolerable’, until that risk is
mitigated to acceptable level.
A good plan of action often includes a mixture of different things. There may be a few cost-
effective or easy improvements you can do quickly, perhaps as a temporary solution until more
reliable controls are in place. Remember to priorities and tackle the most important things first.
As you complete each action, tick it off your plan.
8th Edition 72
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
While the majority of safety defences/controls in place were assessed as effective, additional
measures are required, which are detailed in a risk management plan outlining short-and
longer-term measures:
Short-term
Long-term
Monitor your agreed implementation solutions to make sure they are working, and if they are
not, reassess.
Review your risk assessment. Have there been any changes? Make sure your risk
assessment stays up to date.
Set a review date for this risk assessment. Write it down and note it in your diary as an
annual event, or enter it in your calendar.
During the year, if there is a significant change, don’t wait. Check your risk assessment and,
where necessary, amend it. If possible, think about the risk assessment when you are planning
the change – that way you can be more flexible and proactive.
ALARP*
Where risk is concerned, there is no such thing as absolute safety. Risk management is often
based on the concept of ALARP or ‘as low as reasonably practicable’. There is wide
acceptance that not all risk can be eliminated. There are practical limits to how far the industry
and the community will go in paying to reduce adverse risks.
The concept of ALARP will be replaced by ALoS (acceptable level of safety) in the very near
future.
»» All efforts should be made to reduce risks to the lowest level possible until a point is reached
at which the cost of introducing further safety measures significantly outweighs the safety
benefit.
8th Edition 73
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
»» A risk should be tolerated only if it can be demonstrated that there is a clear benefit in doing
so (i.e. there is a compelling operational need in the organization).
Tolerable Risks that people are generally prepared to tolerate to secure their benefits.
Tolerable risks must be properly assessed and controlled to keep the residual risk ALARP,
and must be reviewed periodically to ensure they remain that way (e.g. the potential risk of
pedestrians, walking between the terminal and the aircraft, being struck by a moving vehicle
is only tolerated IF appropriate barricading, security escort and lighting are in place).
Broadly acceptable Risks are considered sufficiently low and well controlled. Further risk
reduction is required only if reasonably practicable measures are available. Broadly
acceptable risks are those that people would regard as insignificant or trivial in their daily lives,
or which exist, but have no practicable mitigator (e.g. most organizations accept that staff
could be injured on their way to work, but have little control over what happens on public
roads).
8th Edition 74
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
To determine whether a risk is tolerable (in the ALARP approach), you need to consider a
number of criteria:
»» Legal requirements
»» Expert judgement
»» Cost-benefit analysis
If the proposed control represents current, relevant, established good practice, that is
sufficient evidence to conclude that it is reasonably practicable. For example, it:
ALARP application
Identification of hazard
Risk assessment
The concept of ‘As Low as Reasonably Practicable’ or ALARP is commonly referred to for
risks with significant safety or environmental consequences and is shown in the diagram
below. The concept is also applicable for other risks.
The approach is to divide risks into three bands, which align with the risk ratings from the risk
matrix at Annex A, as follows:
8th Edition 75
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1. An upper band (risk rating > 7) where adverse risks are intolerable whatever the benefits the
activity may bring and the risk reduction measures are essential whatever the cost.
2. A middle band (risk rating of 6 or 7) where costs and benefits are taken into account and
opportunities balanced against potential adverse consequences.
3. A lower band (risk rating < 6) where positive or negative risks are negligible, or so small that
no further risk treatment measures are needed.
Where risk is close to the intolerable level it is expected that the risk will be reduced unless
the cost of reducing the risk is grossly disproportionate to the benefits gained.
Where risks are close to the negligible level then action should only be taken to reduce the
risk where benefits exceed the costs of reduction.
Consequence descriptors
8th Edition 76
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
8th Edition 77
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
11.3 In evaluating the safety risk of an operator or individual, the FOI should ensure that
all stakeholders within the DGCA whose area of responsibility/expertise may be affected
by the request are included in the evaluation of the application and the safety risk analysis.
The lead FOI must document the evaluation utilizing Job Aid 38 of annexures to CAP 8200
and ensure that it is included in the permanent record along with the application for a
deviation/exemption.
11.4 The safety risk analysis should identify and evaluate all possible hazards, assign
appropriate risk levels, and identify any mitigations along with plans for their
implementation to reduce the risk to level As Low As Reasonably Practical (ALARP). As
appropriate, the risk analysis should account for the following:
(e) Identification of hazards and safety risks associated with aerodrome variation;
(f) Experience of the flight, cabin-safety, dispatcher and maintenance staff as applicable;
(k) All other conditions relevant to the requested deviation or exemption; and
8th Edition 78
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
11.5 The review team must verify that all potential hazards have been identified by the
operator or individual and that the appropriate risk level has been assigned based on the
probability and severity of its occurrence. For each hazard resulting in a risk that has not
been reduced to ALARP, the review team must ensure that mitigation has been identified
and evaluated to be effective and implementable in reducing the risk to ALARP. The team
should ensure that mitigations action may not potentially introduce other risks that
individually or in combination with other risks would be unacceptable. Once all mitigations
have been applied, the highest risk level for all identified hazards must not exceed the
acceptable level.
11.6 Even after risks have been reduced to ALARP and found to be acceptable, the
responsible management team member for the operator or individual who has been
identified as having the authority to accept the residual risk should sign and accept the
residual risk, if any, entailed in the proposal.
11.7 Once the DGCA review team is satisfied that the risk analysis submitted by the
applicant is satisfactory and has competed Job Aid 38 of annexures to CAP 8200, the
DGCA review team will conduct an internal risk analysis in accordance with Chapter 10
above in order to evaluate the hazards and risk associated while granting the approval to
operator or individual’s request.
8th Edition 79
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
This chapter provides guidance for investigation to be done by Flight Standards Directorate
on the information gathered and ensure post investigation corrective measures has been
taken including enforcement actions against the personnel concerned as well as the stake
holder if any.
DGCA is tasked with monitoring civil aviation safety to determine the level of safety of the
civil aviation system. In this regard, Directorate of Air Safety:
8th Edition 80
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
a) Airworthiness Directorate
b) Flight Standard Directorate
c) Aerodrome Standard Directorate
d) ANSS Directorate
e) Directorate of Flying Training in case of occurrence involving FTO.
f) Any other directorate depending upon the nature of the occurrence.
2.3 In case of an accident, the Occurrence Review Board meeting is convened on an urgent
basis wherein a DGCA team is constituted for review and identification of facts related with
the accident and to initiate appropriate action by the respective directorate.
2.4 Based on the information received from Director Air Safety (HQ), FSD(HQ) will intimate the
concerned FSD regional office for initiating investigation and necessary action for ensuring
continued compliance of the conditions of an approval, authorization, license or certificate
granted to a person or an organization under the Aircraft Rules, 1937 and initiating corrective
actions and if required, enforcement action(s) in case of any violations.
2.5 On receipt of the above information, concerned FSD regional office will take such action as it
considers necessary to ensure that aviation organization(s)/ personnel continue to meet the
regulatory requirements. In case of violations which may affect safety of operations, the
directorate may initiate immediate enforcement action(s) such as withdrawal/suspension of
license, corrective training, action against relevant post holder etc., as deemed necessary.
2.6 Actions including enforcement action(s) taken by concerned regional office shall be provided
to FSD(HQ) within a period not exceeding sixty (60) days from the date of intimation. In case
the investigation by regional office indicates that the existing regulatory provisions or the
procedures require to be amended, the same shall also be brought to the notice of FSD(HQ).
2.7 Based on the information on actions taken by regional office, DGCA HQ may issue safety
directives, guidance for persons/ stakeholders.
8th Edition 81
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
3.3 The evaluation team will consist of officers from the relevant Directorate and headed by
an officer from the Air Safety Directorate. The officers conducting this evaluation shall
be, as far as possible other than those involved in the certification process of the
concerned operator.
3.4 The evaluation process would include review of “Occurrence report”, visit to the
accident/incident site, review of the documents and procedures, interview with the
concerned personnel while ensuring that this does not interfere with the investigation
by AAIB.
3.5 The evaluation report shall be prepared in the format prescribed in Appendix ‘A’.
3.6 The information generated by the evaluation process shall be shared only within DGCA
and not with any external agency. The information shall be used for determining the
compliance/ non-compliance of regulatory framework and for taking remedial action
which may include preventive action(s) and/ or enforcement action(s).
4. Continuing surveillance
5. Record Keeping
Flight Standard Directorate shall maintain records of all documents generated and received
during the process of Dissemination/Evaluation of safety information and regulatory
investigation/evaluation of accidents and incidents.
8th Edition 82
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
ASSESSMENT REPORT
Appendix-‘A’
Occurrence Classification
1. General Information:
a) Aircraft details
b) Owner/Operator
c) No. of Persons on board
d) Date and time
e) Last Point of Departure
f) Point of Intended Landing
g) Place
h) Phase of operation
i) Type of Operation
2. Brief description:
3. Other damage:
8th Edition 83
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Aircraft information:
5. FIRE, if any:
Investigating Officer
Date
8th Edition 84
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
13.1 Introduction.
13.1.1 Aeronautical data is data used for aeronautical applications such as performance calculations,
navigation, flight planning, flight simulators, terrain awareness, and other purposes (e.g.,
navigation data, terrain and obstacle data, and Aerodrome mapping data). This data is usually
published as maps and charts in physical or electronic formats. Detailed guidance on the
publication of aeronautical maps and charts in accordance with ICAO’s standards and
recommended practices is given in CAR Section 9 Series G Part I.
13.1.2 Authenticated Aerodrome data especially pertaining to runway/ taxiway availability and
obstacles is essential for correct airplane performance calculations in order to meet the
operational safety requirements. Flight Operations Inspectors are required to review and
approve the performance data sections of Operations Manuals (OMs) at the time of
certification in order to ensure safe conduct of operations. Accordingly, they must also ensure
that data is obtained from an approved source.
13.1.3 This section contains specific information, direction, and guidance to inspectors for the review
and approval of Aerodrome data acquisition procedures of operators. i.e. it contains guidance
for accepting or approving an operator’s system for acquiring Aerodrome data. It also contains
guidance for reviewing and approving the performance data in Company Operations Manuals.
13.2 Most of the data required for flight operations can be obtained by a subscription to a standard
government or commercial aeronautical navigation charting service, such as the AAI’s AIP
service or the Jeppesen/Sanderson Company. Operators of large transport category airplanes
and commuter category airplanes require obstacle information for takeoff performance
analysis which is more detailed than information provided by standard navigational charting
services.
13.4 Obstacle Data Sources. There are several data sources that an operator or contractor may
use to acquire obstacle data. Principal operations inspectors (POI) should be aware that no
one source of data is sufficient and a combination of the following sources is required.
8th Edition 85
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
13.4.1 Aerodrome Obstacle Charts – Type A and Type B (AOC). AOCs are produced by the AAI for
licensed aerodromes. An Aerodrome analysis must be based on an AOC if one has been
published for the Aerodrome being analyzed. AOCs must be augmented with other information
sources, however, for the following reasons:
(a) AOCs are primarily produced for Aerodromes with precision instrument approaches.
(b) Terrain surrounding the Aerodrome, which can have a significant impact on allowable takeoff
weight, may not be shown on an AOC.
(c) Chart revision is usually conducted every 2-4 years depending on the aerodrome operator.
For many Aerodromes, however, the most recent chart revisions are considerably older.
13.4.2 Terrain Charts. Terrain charts are produced by the Geological Survey of India for aviation
usage as well as various other uses. Terrain charts are primarily used for Aerodromes located
at high altitudes where the obstacles consist of terrain rather than man-made objects.
13.4.3 Local Layout Plans. Local layout plans may be used when AOCs are not available. Since local
layout plans must be prepared as a pre-condition of Aerodrome approval, the layout plans are
available for many of the Aerodromes that do not have an AOC. Local layout plans contain
depictions of obstructions and terrain. The layout plans may be as much as 3 to 5 years old
so local surveys must be made. Local layout plans may be obtained from Aerodrome owners
or organized by the operator from authorized surveyors.
13.4.4 An Aerodrome Master Record, is available with the Directorate of Aerodrome Standards for
all public use Aerodromes. This master record contains comprehensive data on Aerodromes,
including obstacles. The master record is updated regularly for those Aerodromes where
scheduled operations are conducted. For other Aerodromes this data may not be updated for
long periods.
13.4.5 Aerodrome Terrain and Obstacle Chart — Electronic. The electronic chart shall portray the
terrain and obstacle data in combination with aeronautical data, as appropriate and approved
by DGCA.
13.4.6 Notices to Airmen (NOTAM). Temporary and immediate changes to Aerodrome information
are published as NOTAMs.
13.4.7 Indian Air Force/ Defence sources provide the requisite aeronautical data for defence airfields.
Defence Airfields are not permitted for survey by civil agencies and for operations to such
airfields, the data provided by the defence authorities needs to be relied upon.
13.4.8 Foreign Government Publications. Runway and obstacle data, similar to AAI publications, is
available for most foreign Aerodromes. Access to this information must be obtained through
the appropriate agency.
13.4.9 International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Aeronautical Information Publications. ICAO
publishes several forms of aeronautical data in forms similar to AAI publications in format,
purpose, and coverage. This information is available by subscription and the operators can be
asked to obtain the same.
13.4.10 Station Managers. Most domestic and international operators give station managers the tasks
of maintaining surveillance of Aerodromes, gathering obstruction data, and reporting any
actual or potential changes. Managers do this through personal observation, liaison with the
Aerodrome management, and participation in groups, such as a snow removal committee.
8th Edition 86
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Before such information may be used, it must be verified by an official source. For example,
one operator performs this verification by sending the Aerodrome manager a copy of the AOC
and requesting that the Aerodrome manager plot the new obstacle and then sign and date the
chart.
13.4.11 Customer Interaction. Large commercial services selling Aerodrome data are rapidly alerted
to changes in obstacles by their customers. The commercial service then verifies the data
from an official source and publishes the change.
13.5 Approval of Data Acquisition Systems. POIs may approve data acquisition systems
using the following information and guidance.
13.5.1 Characteristics of Approvable Systems. Acceptable system for the acquisition of obstruction
data must have the following characteristics:
(a) The system must include all Aerodromes and runways on which operations are conducted.
The original data should be based on AOCs or the ICAO equivalent. Data must be updated
by active surveillance. When an operator serves Aerodromes where AOCs are not available,
other systems based on other data sources may be approved. The operator must show that
the data is complete and accurate. To ensure accuracy, the data must be maintained. In
individual cases, the POI may approve the use of data from an operator-conducted survey.
(b) The operator must demonstrate the capability of maintaining continuous surveillance on the
Aerodromes and runways served. Subscribing to a government publication is not sufficient
surveillance because of the stated limitations of the data in these publications. Updated data
must be validated and documented. The operator must have an active and timely revision
process with sufficient personnel and physical resources to collect, process, and revise the
data.
(c) Contractors and Commercial Sources. POIs may approve or accept data systems that are
operated by a contractor for the operator and that meet the laid down criteria as follows: -The
primary issue in approving a contractor-operated system is the contractor’s ability to maintain
the required Aerodrome surveillance. The contractor may do this by demonstrating that its
client base adequately performs this function. A contractor who cannot demonstrate adequate
surveillance capabilities cannot be approved.
(d) POIs need not require that operators provide extensive documentation of the contractor’s
capabilities if the contractor is well established, has a wide client base, and provides a
standardized service. When the POI has concerns about the contractor’s capabilities, or when
the operator proposes that the contractor provide a unique service, the POI shall require that
the operator conduct a full analysis of the contractor’s competence and then submit the
analysis to the POI. When the POI is unsure of which course of action to take, the POI should
seek guidance from DGCA Headquarters.
8th Edition 87
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
13.6.2 Performance data for each variant aircraft the operator operates in a format readily usable by
the flight crew. (This data may be obtained from the AFM directly or purchased in a digital
format suitable for computer processing.)
13.6.3 Manual computation procedures or a computer algorithm for converting aircraft performance
data from the AFM format to the format used by the flight crew. (The system must make all
necessary computations for determining the maximum allowable weight for takeoff and for
determining the V speeds to be used at the selected weight.)
13.7 Current Industry Practices. There are a wide range of methods for: collecting airport and
obstacle data; preparing airport analyses; and preparing, publishing, and distributing the
performance data sections of OMs. To implement each or all of these functions, operators
may either establish a department within the company or contract the work out. Operators may
contract for the collection of airport and obstacle data but produce the airport analysis in-
house. Other operators may supply airport data to aircraft manufacturers or other contractors
who prepare the airport analysis. Generally, major airlines do more of this process in-house,
while smaller operators may contract for these services.
13.8 Manual Computation System from AFM Data. Operators may choose to have flight crew
members, dispatchers, or flight followers conduct manual data computations from the AFM
performance section for each takeoff. This system is flexible because it can be used for any
runway for which the required input parameters can be obtained. The disadvantage of such a
system is that computations can be difficult, complex, time-consuming, and error-prone. Flight
crew members, flight followers, and dispatchers must be carefully and thoroughly trained in
such a system. Flight crews must be supplied with the location of the controlling obstacle for
each runway used. While this system is widely used for small airplanes, it is impractical for the
routine operations of large airplanes because of the complexity of the required computations
and the high probability of human error. The system is, however, available to the operator for
backup in the case of computer failure and for special one-time requirements.
13.9 Tabulated Data Method. AFM data may be combined with airport and runway data and
published in tabular format. The product of this tabulated data method is usually termed an
airport analysis. Typically, the flight crew is provided with a table for each runway and flap
setting. The flight crew member enters the temperature on the table to determine maximum
allowable takeoff weight and then enters the actual weight to determine the V speeds.
Additional corrections are required for factors such as wet or contaminated runways and
winds.
13.9.1 Tabulated Data. Tabulated data is easier to use, less error prone, and requires less training
than is required for AFM data. A properly designed OM system retains most of the operating
flexibility of the AFM system. A tabulated data system reduces, but does not eliminate, human
error. Disadvantage of the tabulated data system is that crewmembers must maintain an up-
to-date chart for each runway from which operations are authorized. A means must be
available to transmit current charts to the flight crew before they are needed. Provisions must
be made for temporarily shortened runways.
8th Edition 88
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
13.9.2 Generating Performance Data Tables. The operator must be capable of generating
performance data tables which retain the degree of accuracy inherent in the AFM data.
Generally, this must be done manually, by carefully picking data points from a graph, entering
the data into a computer, and carefully verifying the generated points. The amount of work
required to prepare tabulated data from an AFM often precludes operators from generating
their own data packages. Most often the operator will be required to buy a digital data package
from the manufacturer from which to generate the required tables. POIs may approve other
sources, however, when the operator can adequately establish the accuracy of the data.
13.9.3 Performance. The operator’s system must be capable of performing all of the required
computations for each takeoff situation, including the selection of the correct controlling
obstacle for each flap setting.
13.10 Simplified Data Method. A simplified data system is based on a specified set of assumptions
about the conditions under which the aircraft will be operated. For example, takeoffs might be
limited to runways longer than 5,000 feet and less than 4,000 feet elevation. In this system,
the crew is supplied with a simple chart or set of cards which gives the V speeds at specified
weight increments. This chart is used on all runways. The operator performs an airport
analysis for each airport served and demonstrates that when the aircraft is operated in
accordance with the specified set of assumptions, it will perform either equal to, or better than,
the performance required in the applicable regulations on all runways the crew is authorized
to use.
13.10.1 Advantages. Some of the system’s advantages are: its relative simplicity, the lack of crew
error, the ease of crew training, and the speed with which the crew can determine V speeds.
13.10.2 Disadvantages. Some of the system’s disadvantages are: it often imposes severe
performance penalties on operators, it is inflexible, and operations must either be terminated
or an alternate system used when the simplifying assumptions cannot be met (for such
conditions as construction, part of runway closed, ice, rain, or shortened runways).
13.10.3 The system is best suited for operators who serve a limited number of locations regularly and
who operate either at large airports, near sea level, or at moderate temperatures.
13.11 Real-time Method. A real time data system is one in which the required computations are
made immediately before takeoff for every flight. Usually the data is relayed to the flight crew
by radio or through Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS). The
advantages of such a system are that it is extremely flexible, up-to-date, and efficient.
Changes in obstacles due to construction, weight, temperature, and runway can be handled
immediately. Also, the operator can take maximum advantage of the performance capabilities
of the airplane. Some disadvantages of the system are that it is expensive, it requires
extensive equipment and highly trained personnel to operate, and that adequate backup must
be available should the main computer go offline. The operator must be able to collect all of
the required data, process it, and transmit it to the crew quickly.
8th Edition 89
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
13.12 Evaluation of an Operator’s System. Generally, POIs do not have the capability to verify
each data point when approving the performance data section of a OM. The validity and
reliability of the computation system itself, however, can be evaluated.
13.12.1 Provide Analysis. POIs shall require the operator to provide an analysis, with documentation,
of the following:
(b) Assumptions on which the computer program is based (for example, they must determine if
the correct factors are used for each type of aircraft);
(e) Results of parallel manual calculations made with AFM data to confirm results.
13.12.2 Coordinate. The POI should coordinate with the principal maintenance inspector (PMI) to
ensure that the operator’s airplanes meet the specifications of the certification regulations. For
example, a small airplane may have been modified to install more than the original nine seats.
Unless all of the required modifications have been completed, the airplane may not qualify for
the proposed operation.
13.12.3 Responsible. When the operator contracts for data or computation, the operator is
responsible for the validity of the results. POI may find that the contractor has been previously
evaluated and approved for another operator. The POI may approve reputable sources for
these services that have been previously evaluated.
13.12.4 Procurement. Operators should procure computer programs from a reliable source. The
computer programmers should be qualified in both education and experience. The validity of
the computer program should be validated by aeronautical engineers and computer
specialists.
13.12.5 Performance. All of the calculations required in the regulations for the type of airplane
involved must be performed, including en route and destination calculations.
13.13.6 Obtaining Data. For real-time systems, the operator’s method of obtaining data for a
specific flight and for transmitting that data to and from the individual performing the
calculations must be shown to be accurate and timely.
13.12.6 Review. The POI or a designated inspector should review the verification process
conducted by the operator. Several runways at different airports should be selected for
verification with the AFM data. Short runways with obstacles should be checked by manual
calculation, particularly at airports with higher temperatures and elevations. The operator
should be able to identify all of the obstacles evaluated by the computer and the one selected
as the limiting obstacle in each case. The POI must be aware that under different temperature
and weight conditions, a different flap setting may be required, and different obstacles may be
controlling. The inspector should ensure that the operator has verified the limiting obstacle
under various conditions and flap settings.
8th Edition 90
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
13.13 Approval Criteria. POIs may approve any method of performance data computation and
presentation that meets the following criteria:
13.13.1 The system must make all of the computations required in the AFM and in the pertinent
operating rules.
13.13.2 Provisions must be made in the system for all makes, models, and variations of aircraft used
by the operator.
13.13.3 The system must account for all pertinent variables such as temperature, weight, thrust,
runway condition, and obstacles.
13.13.4 The system must be appropriate to the operator’s requirements. Large, highly complex
airplanes usually require very different systems from those required for small, simple
airplanes.
13.13.5 The system must be reliable in that identical answers must be generated each time the
process is entered with identical parameters.
13.13.6 The system must be accurate in that it generates performance data that agrees with AFM data
within the degree of accuracy inherent in the original AFM data. For example, when the AFM
data is accurate to +2 percent, the operator’s system must produce results that do not deviate
from the AFM data by more than +2 percent.
13.13.7 The system should be relatively simple, easy to use, and not error-prone.
13.13.8 When simplifying assumptions are made, those assumptions must be clearly and completely
stated in the operator’s Operations Manual (OM) as operator-imposed limitations (for example,
a maximum field elevation of 4,000 feet and minimum runway length of 5,000 feet). When the
assumptions cannot be met, the actions to be taken by the flight crew, flight followers, and
dispatchers must be clearly specified. In such cases, operations must be prohibited or
alternate procedures specified.
13.13.9 The flight crew procedures for generating, obtaining, and verifying data must be thoroughly
described in the OM.
Scope
This Formal Arrangement (FA) documents the agreed provision of services for the supply of
Aeronautical Information or Data by [organisation name] (The Data Originator/Authorised
Source) to [organisation name] (The requesting Authorised Source/AISP), and the agreed
standards to which said information or data shall be provided.
[Insert Data recipient’s details here] [Insert Data Originator details here]
Term
8th Edition 91
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
or
Once agreed specified parties cannot withdraw from this FA within the above dates without
the consent of the other signatories.
Service Description
The Data Originator/Provider will provide the Aeronautical Information/Data to the signatory
identified above.
[List here a description of the aeronautical information/ data being provided/ received]
Exclusions
Limitations
Entities Involved
• A declaration by each party mentioned in the FA that the legislation requirements of the
ADQIR have been met.
• The signatories to this FA shall meet the regulatory requirements of applicable DGCA CAR
Section 9 Series G and Series I.
• The data shall include its effective date.
• The data shall include its period of validity
• The data shall be provided at least [insert timeliness requirement] days prior to the
effective date
• The data shall be provided by [insert delivery requirement]
8th Edition 92
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
• The AISP shall publish the data within the requested publication unless otherwise agreed, in
writing, with the data originator.
Reporting
Any signatory to this FA shall report to the other signatory any failure to uphold the
requirements detailed in this FA.
Changes to this FA
Any changes to this FA shall be agreed by all signatories beforehand and be subject to DGCA
approval/ acceptance.
8th Edition 93
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
14.1 INTRODUCTION
14.1.1 From the early days of aviation, it was realized that meteorological information was vital for
the planning and a constant factor for the safe conduct of flights; pilots need to be informed
about meteorological conditions along the routes to be flown and at their destination
aerodromes. The high operating cost of modern aircraft means that optimum use must be
made of available meteorological information and that forecasting accuracy must continue to
be improved. The increasing use of flight management computers and the establishment on-
board aircraft of reliable data links between aircraft and ground make it possible to monitor
flight progress and update flight plans on the basis of new weather conditions.
14.1.2 This chapter provides guidance t o t h e i n s p e c t o r s for the certification, evaluation for
the validation of meteorological data, meteorological information that shall be used by
operators and flight crew members for:
(b) In-flight re planning by operators using centralized operational control of flight operations;
14.2 Meteorological information supplied to operators and flight crew members shall cover
the flight in respect of time, altitude and geographical extent. Accordingly, the information
shall relate to appropriate fixed times, or periods of time, and shall extend to the aerodrome
of intended landing, also covering the meteorological conditions expected between the
aerodrome of intended landing and alternate aerodromes designated by the operator.
14.2.1 Meteorological information supplied to operators and flight crew members shall be up to
date and include the following information, as agreed between the meteorological
authority/ service provider and the operators concerned.
Forecasts of:
8th Edition 94
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Note 1. — Forecasts of upper-air humidity and geopotential altitude of flight levels are
used only in automatic flight planning and need not be displayed.
14.2.2 METAR or SPECI (including trend forecasts as issued in accordance with regional air
navigation agreement) for the aerodromes of departure and intended landing, and for take-
off, en-route and destination alternate aerodromes;
14.2.3 TAF or amended TAF for the aerodromes of departure and intended landing, and for take-
off, en-route and destination alternate aerodromes;
14.2.5 SIGMET information and appropriate special air-reports relevant to the whole route;
Note. — Appropriate special air-reports will be those not already used in the preparation
of SIGMET.
14.3.6 Volcanic ash and tropical cyclone advisory information relevant to the whole route; as
determined by regional air navigation agreement, GAMET area forecasts and/or area
forecasts for low-level flights in chart form prepared in support of the issuance of AIRMET
information, and AIRMET information for low-level flights relevant to the whole route;
14.4 Forecasts listed under shall be generated from the digital forecasts provided by the WAFCs
whenever these forecasts cover the intended flight path in respect of time, altitude and
geographical extent, unless otherwise agreed between the meteorological authority and
the operator concerned.
14.4.1 When forecasts are identified as being originated by the WAFCs, no modifications shall be
made to their meteorological content.
14.4.2 Charts generated from the digital forecasts provided by the WAFCs shall be made
available, as required by operators, for fixed areas of coverage.
14.4.3 When forecasts of upper wind and upper-air temperature listed under 13.2.1.1 a) are
8th Edition 95
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
supplied in chart form, they shall be fixed time prognostic charts for flight levels as
specified When forecasts of SIGWX phenomena listed under 13.2.1.1 f) are supplied in
chart form, they shall be fixed time prognostic charts for an atmospheric layer limited by
flight levels as specified.
14.4.4 The forecasts of upper wind and upper-air temperature and of SIGWX phenomena above
flight level 100 requested for pre-flight planning and in-flight replanning by the operator
shall be supplied as soon as they become available, but not later than 3 hours before
departure. Other meteorological information requested for pre-flight planning and in-flight
replanning by the operator shall be supplied as soon as is practicable.
14.4.5 When necessary, the meteorological authority of the State providing service for operators
and flight crew members shall initiate coordinating action with the meteorological
authorities of other States with a view to obtaining from them the reports and/or forecasts
required.
14.4.6 Meteorological information supplied to operators and flight crew members at the location
to be determined by the meteorological authority, after consultation with the operators
concerned and at the time agreed between the aerodrome meteorological office and the
operator concerned. The service for pre-flight planning shall be confined to flights
originating within the territory of the State concerned (with in India or foreign station).
14.5 Meteorological information shall be supplied to operators and flight crew members by one
or more of the following, as agreed between the service provider and the operator
concerned, and with the order shown below not implying priorities:
14.5.3 Briefing;
14.5.4 Consultation;
14.5.5 Display; or
8th Edition 96
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
14.6 The Service provider, in consultation with the operator, shall determine:
14.7 Specifications Related To Metreological Information For Pre-Flight Planning And In-Flight
Replanning
14.7.1 Format of upper-air gridded information
14.7.2 Format of information on significant weather
14.7.3 Specific needs in case of helicopter operations
14.9.2 METAR and SPECI (including trend forecasts as issued in accordance with regional air
navigation agreement), TAF, GAMET, SIGMET, AIRMET and volcanic ash and tropical
cyclone advisory information shall be presented.
Recommendation. — The location indicators and the abbreviations used should be explained
in the flight documentation.
Recommendation.—. Where appropriate, approved abbreviations are used the same should
be elaborative with units of measurements.
(a) For convenience, the largest size of charts should be about 42 × 30 cm (standard size A3)
and the smallest size should be about 21 × 30 cm (standard size A4). The choice between
8th Edition 97
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
these sizes should depend on the route lengths and the amount of detail that needs to be
given in the charts as agreed between the meteorological authorities and the users concerned;
(b) Major geographical features, such as coastlines, major rivers and lakes should be depicted in
a way that makes them easily recognizable;
(c) For charts prepared by computer, meteorological data should take preference over basic chart
information, the former cancelling the latter wherever they overlap;
(d) major aerodromes should be shown as a dot and identified by the first letter of the name of
the city the aerodrome serves as given in Table AOP of the relevant regional air navigation
plan;
(e) A geographical grid should be shown with meridians and parallels represented by dotted lines
at each 10° latitude and longitude; dots should be spaced one degree apart;
(f) Latitude and longitude values should be indicated at various points throughout the charts (i.e.
not only at the edges); and
(g) labels on the charts for flight documentation should be clear and simple and should present
the name of the world area forecast center or, for non-world area forecast system (WAFS)
products, the originating center, the type of chart, date and valid time and, if necessary, the
types of units used in an unambiguous way.
(c) wind and temperature data selected from the data sets received from a world area forecast
center shall be depicted in a sufficiently dense latitude/longitude grid; and
(d) Wind arrows shall take precedence over temperatures and either shall take precedence over
chart background.
(b) Charts to be provided shall be generated from the digital forecasts provided by the WAFCs
whenever these forecasts cover the intended flight path in respect of time, altitude and
geographical extent, unless otherwise agreed between the meteorological authority and the
operator concerned.
8th Edition 98
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(b) All references to aerodrome meteorological conditions, such as height indications of the bases
of clouds, shall be expressed in height above the aerodrome elevation.
Recommendation — Where the forecasts are supplied in chart form, flight documentation for
low-level flights, including those in accordance with the visual flight rules, operating up to flight
level 100 (or up to flight level 150 in mountainous areas or higher, where necessary), should
contain the following as appropriate to the flight:
(b) Permit access to the system by operators and flight crew members and also by other
aeronautical users concerned through suitable telecommunications means;
(c) use access and interrogation procedures based on abbreviated plain language and, as
appropriate, ICAO location indicators, and aeronautical meteorological code data-type
designators prescribed by WMO, or based on a menu driven user interface, or other
appropriate mechanisms as agreed between the meteorological authority and the operators
concerned; and
8th Edition 99
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 2
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(c) SIGMET and AIRMET information and special air-reports relevant to the flight, unless the latter
have been the subject of a SIGMET message;
(e) Volcanic ash and tropical cyclone advisory information relevant to the flight; and
(f) Other meteorological information in alphanumeric or graphical form as agreed between the
meteorological authority and the operator concerned.
Note. — Guidance on the display of graphical information in the cockpit is provided in Doc
8896.
14.11.3 Examples of approved sources for meteorological information for aircraft operations are:
(a) The IMD, INDIAN MET DEPARTMENT for Indian operators and those operating outside India.
(c) Active meteorological offices operated by a foreign state that subscribes to the standards and
practices of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) conventions. (These
meteorological offices are normally listed in the meteorology information (MET) tables located
in ICAO Regional Air Navigation Plans (ANP). The Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP)
of individual states also lists active meteorological offices for that state.)
(f) Pilot Weather Reports (PIREP) provided by aircraft of similar speed and performance.
(g) Aircraft Reports (AIREP) provided by aircraft of similar speed and performance.
14.12 The Meteorological Services for civil aviation in India are provided by the India Meteorological
Department, Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Government of India.
14.12.1 Website: www.imd.gov.in
Annexure 14-A
APPROVAL METHOD OF OBTAINING WEATHER DATA
Name of Operator:
In accordance with CAR Section 8 Series O Part II and IV, the following contents of the OM are
approved
Sl No Provision OM EVALUATION
Reference
(Chapter) SAT (S) UNSAT (U) N/A
Enough weather reporting facilities are
available along each route to ensure weather
1.
reports and forecasts necessary for
operations.
Weather reports and forecast used by
2. Operators are from approved Meteorological
Offices.
The operator is utilizing an approved system
for obtaining forecasts and reports which are
3.
pertinent to the nature and scope of
Operations to meet all requirements.
The operator only used meteorological
4. offices listed in the MET tables located in the
ICAO Regional Air Navigation Plans
The operator has weather reports for the
point of origin, any intermediate stops and
5. destination airports for at least two hours
before and two hours after planned
operations.
The dispatcher and flight crew are
thoroughly familiar with the reported
6.
weather conditions on the route before
releasing the flight
The flight crew is thoroughly familiar with
the reported weather conditions on the
7.
route before commencement of the flight,
in case of self-dispatch.
Before the flight the dispatcher provides the
flight crew will all available information
8.
regarding the flight including clear air
turbulence and low altitude wind shear
Before EDTO flights that the weather at
selected alternate airports were at or
9.
above the increased minimum for EDTO
flights.
Remarks:
Designation:
Date:
VOLUME 3
SURVEILLANCE
1.1 OBJECTIVE
i. The purpose of this chapter is to clearly define the responsibilities, goals and methods for
surveillance of flight operations by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (Flight Standards
Directorate).
1.2 BACKGROUND
1.2.1 Section 4.2.1 of Part I to Annex 6 of ICAO Recommended Standards and Practices require
that member states issue air operator certificates or equivalent documents to air operators.
The issuance of an air operator certificate shall be dependent upon the operator demonstrating
an adequate organization, method of control and supervision of flight operations. The
continued validity of that certificate shall be dependent upon the operator's continuing
maintenance of the standards which it demonstrated upon original issuance of the certificate.
Member states must therefore perform surveillance of operators in order to ensure that
operators continue to meet certification requirements. Chapter 8 of the ICAO Manual of
Procedures for Operations Certification and Inspection contains information concerning
States, responsibilities for continuing supervision of certified operators.
1.2.2 Surveillance of leased operations is also under the purview of DGCA. Whereas safety
oversight of aircraft leased into India for supplementing ‘Indian’ carriers’ operations (i.e. foreign
registered aircraft) will be addressed in the lease agreement, the primary responsibility is that
of the lessor. DGCA, however, will be carrying out inspections on a random basis. The
operator leasing the aircraft will be required to maintain, preserve and provide all records for
DGCA audit. Surveillance and safety oversight of Indian registered aircraft, although being the
responsibility of the carrier leasing the aircraft, will be under the oversight plan of DGCA. The
FOI will refer to CAP 3200 Aircraft Leasing Manual for further guidance.
1.2.3 It is important to make a clear distinction between surveillance and certification activities.
Both are important aspects of an inspector's duties and one should not take precedence over
the other. Certification activities are required by specific Civil Aviation Regulations to license,
(certificate) certify or otherwise qualify an aircrew or an operator to operate in a prescribed
manner. Surveillance on the other hand, is aimed at ensuring that the aircrew of operators
continue to adhere to the standards to which they were certified or approved through regular
inspections of various aspects of an operators operations.
1.2.4 This distinction is particularly important in the case of aircrew surveillance. For aircrew, a
type rating, skill test, route check or proficiency check is a certification activity whereas the
observation of a cockpit crew from the observer's seat during scheduled operations and when
no other type of check or requalification is intended is a surveillance activity. For aircrew,
certification activities may be thought of as more "person oriented" where the individual
1.3.1 The Directorate of Flight Inspection was established in 1985 to carry out certification and
surveillance functions on behalf of DGCA. Directive O. Adv ((Av)/FI/1/91-FID expands upon
the provisions of AIC 10 of 1991. This directive also requires FOIs to carry out inspections.
The Directorate of Flight Inspection, was later renamed as Flight Standards Directorate. Flight
Standards Directorate, hereinafter being referred to as FSD, is tasked to carry out the
inspection and surveillance functions covered in the following paragraphs.
(a) Conduct a percentage of proficiency skill and standardization check of pilots and monitor their
skill levels on the aircraft and on simulators on a random basis.
(b) Ensure continuous surveillance of various operational aspects of the airlines and other
operators.
(c) Check that the Aircraft Rules and Regulations on Air Safety complied with.
(d) Conduct any other flying checks specifically ordered by the DGCA.
1.3.2 Clearly, both certification and surveillance responsibilities were envisioned for the FSD
and is particularly important because it requires that the FSD provide continuous surveillance
of various operational aspects of the Operators. This implies, in accordance with ICAO
practices, that surveillance activities encompass operational aspects of the entire airline and
of the air transport system, and not just the-aircrew alone.
1.4.1 The primary objective of surveillance is to provide the DGCA, by means of risk based
oversight surveillance programme, with an accurate, real-time and comprehensive evaluation
of the safety status of the air transportation system. As part of the Annual Surveillance
Programme, Regulatory Audits are planned in which FOIs are part of the DGCA team (for
procedures on these audits, FOIs shall refer to Manual of Regulatory Audits). This surveillance
programme objective is accomplished by DGCA inspectors performing the following:
(a) Determining each airline/ operator's compliance with regulatory requirements and safe
operating practices.
(c) Detecting the need for regulatory, managerial and operational changes.
1.5.1 Surveillance is an important duty and responsibility of inspectors assigned to the DGCA.
Surveillance programs provide a method for the continued evaluation of operator compliance
with government regulations and safe operating devices. Information generated from
surveillance programs permits the DGCA to act upon deficiencies which affect or have a
potential effect an aviation safety, surveillance programs to be effective, they must be carefully
planned and executed. Inspections are specific work activities within a surveillance
programme which should exhibit the following characteristics:
1.5.2 Planning and executing any type of surveillance program may reasonably be broken down
into four phases
(a) Phase One - Developing a risk based oversight surveillance plan by determining the types of
inspections necessary and the frequency of those inspections.
(b) Phase Two - Accomplishing the surveillance plan by conducting the inspections.
(c) Phase Three - Analysing surveillance data gathered from inspection reports and related
information from other sources.
1.5.3 Phase One: Developing a Surveillance Plan. Responsibility for the development of the
annual surveillance program rests with the Directorate. The risk based oversight surveillance
programme should recognize the need to conduct routine and ongoing surveillance and should
anticipate the possibility of special emphasis Surveillance as a result of certain events such
as accidents, incidents, repeated violations of CARs and evidence of financial problems. When
planning a surveillance program, the CFOI/ DDG should identify the program objectives,
evaluate the resources available and determine the specific types and number(s) of
inspections to be conducted in support of that programme. Numbers of inspections should be
established taking into consideration the current operating environment which the FOI
oversees (such as number of aero planes and variety of aero plane types, number of crew
members, routes, number and geographic location of transit stations and the volume of
training being conducted). Previous inspection reports, accident/incident information,
compliance and enforcement information and public complaints should also be used to
determine both the types and frequency of inspections to be accomplished during a given time
frame. History of compliance with regulations and cooperation with the inspectorate may also
be considered when developing a surveillance program for a specific operator. The safety
oversight of operators is to be conducted on a continuous basis, whether or not the AOC has
a specific duration with an expiration date. It should be based on periodic random inspections
of all aspects of the operation.
(a) Pilot Proficiency Check Inspections: A sufficient number of inspections may be conducted so
that Training Captains are observed in the performance of their duties for the purpose of
standardization of training.
(b) It must be emphasized that the preceding are the minimum numbers which must be
accomplished to fulfil the FSD's surveillance responsibilities. Whenever possible, taking into
account inspector resources and the demand for certifications activities, the CFOI will
schedule a significantly larger number of inspections of cockpit crews, cabin crews, check pilot
and training events.
1.5.4 Phase Two: Conducting Surveillance Plan Inspections: During the conduct of the
surveillance plan inspections, accurate and qualitative inspection reporting is essential. High
quality inspection reporting is necessary for the effective accomplishment of the third and
fourth phases of a surveillance program. The quality and standardization of inspection
reporting will be enhance through the use of the inspection checklists and report forms
contained in this handbook.
1.5.5 Phase Three: Analysing Surveillance Data: After the Inspection data has been reported,
an evaluation of the information obtained from inspection reports and related sources must be
conducted. Evaluation of inspection results is a key phase of any surveillance program. The
primary purpose of evaluating surveillance date is to identify both negative and positive trend.
This evaluation of inspection results is also important in terms of redefining and implementing
subsequent surveillance objectives and inspection activity. The CFOI/ DDG and responsible
Inspectors must adopt systematic methods that permit accurate and effective evaluation of
inspection results. Additionally, other related information from incidents, accidents,
enforcement actions and other sources may provide valuable trend information which may
relate to the operator’s safety and compliance status. For example, if in a series of ramp
inspection reports a trend of deficiencies in the use of the MEL is identified, but the cause of
these deficiencies cannot be identified, the CFOI/ DDG may need to adjust the emphasis on
the types of inspections conducted. In this case, additional training program inspections,
manual inspections or flight control inspections (flight release procedures) may be more
effective in determining the cause of these deficiencies. The purpose of this evaluation is thus
summarised as the following:
1.5.6 Phase Four: Determining Appropriate Course of Action. The CFOI/ DDG and Inspectors
must use good judgment when determining the most effective course of action to be taken as
a result of unsatisfactory inspection findings. The appropriate course of action often depends
on many factors, many of which may be quite subjective. Various options which may be
considered are: informal discussion with the operator and/or aircrew; formal written request
for corrective action; withdrawal of DGCA approval for a program, manual or document; and
initiation of an investigation leading to formal enforcement/disciplinary action. Corrective
action which an operator or aircrew takes independently of the DGCA should be taken into
account. The DGCA must also decide whether or not the results of a specific inspection should
result in a modification or their current surveillance program. As previously mentioned, the
DGCA may elect to conduct further inspections to determine if the unsatisfactory finding was
an isolated incident or part of a trend.
(a) Flight Standards Directorate (FSD) Roster Team in co-ordination with Surveillance Review
and Reporting Team (SRRT) shall assign the monthly ASP tasks amongst FSD regional
offices and HQs. Nomination of FOI(s) for the assigned monthly ASP tasks shall be done by
the concerned Regional /HQs office.
(b) FOI(s) shall carry out the surveillance as per relevant Job aids/Checklists provided in CAP
8200 Annexures/CAP 8500 for Ramp inspections.
(c) On completion of the surveillance, FOI(s) shall submit the completed Job aids/Checklists
to SRRT along with the FOIs shall provide a draft Deficiency Reporting Form(s) (DRFs) - CAP
8200 Annexure 32, in editable Word format to SRRT.
(d) SRRT shall vet the DRFs and ensure that the Level of the finding, the regulatory references
made therein are correct and sent the finalized DRFs to the Operator with specific Target
Dates depending upon the Level/Category of finding. In case the finding(s) raised is beyond
the scope of the assigned surveillance, the same shall also be reviewed and taken up for
necessary corrective action.
The ATRs received from the Operator are examined by SRRT. Once found satisfactory the
same are put up for closure to CFOI/Dy. CFOI. In case the ATR is found to be un-satisfactory,
the same is returned to the Operator for further necessary action.
In the case of Level I/Category 3 findings, these will be taken up for closure separately and
the matter raised to one level higher. Appropriate action is taken accordingly. Finally, once the
DRF is closed, the same is to be intimated to the Operator.
1.6.1 The remainder of this volume is devoted to the conduct and reporting of the various types
of surveillance inspections required. A surveillance program which includes all the types of
inspections which appear in the following chapters will ensure that the DGCA is adhering to
the surveillance guidelines provided in Chapter 9 of the ICAO manual of Procedures for
Operations Certification and Inspection. Checklists to aid inspectors in various kinds of
inspections have been placed at Annexure to this Manual.
1.6.2 The surveillance programme for the complete calendar year is prepared in the month of
December and published on the DGCA website. The programme is based on inputs obtained
from each directorate and its execution is monitored on a monthly basis by the Surveillance
and Enforcement Division through monthly updates. FSD carries out various types of
surveillances as explained in subsequent chapters of this volume.
1.6.4 Guidance on the classification, reporting and resolution of deficiencies is also provided in
SSP Circular 01 of 2009, except for reporting of deficiencies for the Ramp Inspections. Further
guidance on the same specific to FSD surveillances is provided in Operations Circular 11 of
2011 which the FOIs may refer to for better assimilation.
1.7.1 Regulatory Audits are conducted by a team of DGCA Inspectors including inspectors from
FSD, Directorate of Air Safety and Airworthiness. In some cases Dangerous Goods inspectors
may also be a part of the team. The team is led by the senior most Inspector from amongst
the team as stipulated in the Annual Surveillance Plan.
1.7.2 Guidance for special procedures pertaining to planning and execution of Regulatory Audits
is provided in the DGCA Manual of Regulatory Audits. The salient aspects of the Regulatory
Audit, as different from other surveillance activities, include the following: -
(a) The Audit is conducted by a Team of Inspectors led by a nominated Team Leader.
(b) An Entry Meeting is conducted at the beginning to explain the purpose of the Audit, introduce
Audit Team Members and obtain a briefing from the operator on the company key personnel
and ongoing operations/ activities. The overall Audit plan and its schedule is also discussed
during this meeting.
(c) The Team members must interact with each other to share information and cross check
whether various aspects of the operations and maintenance are adequately synchronised
within the operator.
(d) Inspectors must make use of the Confirmation Request Form given at Appendix 1 in the
Manual of Regulatory Audits to obtain detailed or confirmed information for any specific aspect
that may not readily get established from a study of documents. A typical example would be
details of flying supervisors’ availability or cross-utilisation of pilots in the case of NSOPs.
(e) An Exit Meeting is conducted wherein Inspectors summarise the audit findings, stating areas
of strength and weakness. Any controversial discussion with company representatives
regarding audit report content must be avoided. The auditee will be advised of those audit
findings that may be subject to enforcement action. The auditee will also be advised of the
company’s responsibility to take appropriate action to correct all non-conformances and
prevent their recurrence.
(f) The Team Leader compiles the Audit Report after obtaining inputs from all Team members
and forwards the same to the operator through DAS (HQ), as approved.
(g) The procedure for classification of deficiencies remains the same as provided in SSP Circular
01 of 2009 and Operations Circular 11 of 2011.
Surveillance of ATOs/GTOs offering advanced training for pilot’s licenses such as type
or instrument ratings specified in ICAO annex 1, whose principle place of business
and registered offices are located within India or outside shall be accomplished in
accordance with the procedure laid down in CAP 7100.
1.9.1 An audit may identify observations and/or deficiencies in, or the misapplication of Civil
Aviation Requirements, Policies and Procedures. Where an observation or deficiency
indicates a need for revised policies, standards, procedures or guidelines, a finding shall be
made against Civil Aviation Requirements and not the auditee.
1.9.2 Such findings are called parallel report. The Inspector will forward the Parallel Report to
the Team Leader who will forward the parallel report to the CA/DAS(HQ) within 30 days of the
completion of the audit and shall identify the problem, cause, responsibility and recommended
solution for each finding. All supporting documentation shall be included in the parallel report.
1.9 Enforcement
1.1 The Enforcement Policy and Procedures Manual provides the details and guidance to
officers of DGCA about the statutory provisions to be complied with by the industry and
the procedures to be followed for their enforcement. Enforcement is the action
necessary when compliance is not present.Enforcement requires legal or administrative
action.
1.2 The Flight Standards Directorate of DGCA is vested with the responsibility of carrying
out spot checks/ surveillance to ensure that the maintenance is carried out in accordance
with Aircraft Rules, Civil Aviation Requirements, various directives issued by DGCA from
time to time and manufacturer's requirements so that safety is not compromised. While
carrying out surveillance, spot checks, if violation of any requirements which could affect
safety is observed, necessary action is required to be taken by DGCA against the erring
personnel as adeterrent to obviate recurrence of similar violation.
1.3 Rule 3A of the Aircraft Rules, 1937, provides that any power or duty conferred or
imposed by these rules on the Central Government or on the Director General, may be
exercised or discharged by any person authorised by the Central Government in this
behalf. Accordingly, the Central Government through Notifications No. S.O.726 (E) and
S.O.727 (E) both dated 4th October, 1994, has delegated these powers to various
officers of FSD.
1.4 This chapter lays down the procedures to be followed by FSD when cases of non-
compliances requiring punitive actions are dealt. Officers shall consider each case
individually in order to determine an appropriate enforcement action. The broad
guidelines for investigation and enforcement as detailed in enforcement policy and
procedure manual shall be followed.
2. Investigation
3. Enforcement Action
3.1 The most important decision in the enforcement process is determining theappropriate
deterrent action to be taken when the evidence indicates that an individual has
contravened a statutory provision.
3.2 The detailed Enforcement procedure as detailed in EPPM shall be followed in
determining appropriate deterrent action
4. Record Keeping
4.1 DGCA shall establish a system to maintain recordsof all documents generated and
received. It may be ensured that all related records are maintained in chronological
manner and all the pages are appropriately numbered. Traceability of all records should
be ensured for futurereference.
2.1 GENERAL
2.1.1 Background and Objectives. Paragraph 9.6.2 of the ICAO Doc 8335 Manual of Procedures for
Operations Certification and Inspection states that Base Inspections should be performed at
the operator's principal base of operations, sub-bases, and separate maintenance facilities;
and the purpose of the inspection is to assess the suitability of the operator's organization,
management, facilities, equipment, manuals, personnel and training records. The operations
portion of Base Inspections essentially consists of seven segments as follows:
2.1.2 Checklist. A Main Base Inspection Checklist is incorporated in Annexures to CAP 8200 which
will be used for all Main Base inspections.
2.1.3 General Inspection Guidelines: Inspectors should ensure that they have reviewed the previous
findings and Action Taken Reports (ATR) submitted by the operator whose audit is to be
conducted. The Inspector(s) rostered for the audit will confirm the same to CFOI through mail.
Inspectors should inform the operator at least 7 working days prior to Inspection to make
appropriate arrangements for inspecting elements of the Base Inspection. Unlike many types
of operations inspections which are most effective when conducted on short notice (such as
Ramp inspections and En Route Inspections), elements of the Base operation Inspection are
not subject to repeated adjustments on the part of the operator in anticipation of the inspection
and the inspections are most productive following adequate notice and coordination. During
the initial contact, the operator should be briefed in detail regarding the specific intent of the
inspection, areas to be covered and the approximate duration of the inspection. Arrangements
should be made to ensure that key company personnel will be present during the course of
the inspections to provide information and answer questions. The required company presence
will vary according to the type of inspection. For example, when evaluating operational control
procedures and operations, the inspector will require almost constant contact with personnel
who are responsible for each functional area. Conversely, the inspection of Flight and Duty
Time records requires very little company involvement except to make records available and
answer any initial questions the inspector may have about the operator's record keeping
system.
2.1.4 Before commencing each inspection of the areas listed in paragraph I above, inspectors
should familiarize themselves to the maximum extent possible with the Operator's Manuals,
policies and instructions regarding the area to be inspected. In developing an annual work
program, it therefore should be a practice to schedule an Operations Manual Inspection in
advance of the other types of inspections contained in this chapter. This will provide the
inspector with an overview of the operator's instructions and policies prior to evaluating their
effectiveness in day to day practice. Before performing the individual Inspections contained in
the sections of this chapter which follow, inspectors should review for a second time and in
greater depth those portions of the operator's manual which pertain to the specific area to be
evaluated. In that sense, all inspections which are conducted by the Operations Inspectors
become an extension of the formal evaluation of the Operator's Manual, because
unsatisfactory performance in operational areas can often be traced to inadequate planning,
guidance and training.
2.1.5 Upon arriving at the site where the inspection is to be conducted, inspectors should introduce
themselves and present their identification to the operator's representatives, if not personally
known to them. The inspector should review with the operator the scope of the inspection to
be conducted, and assemble key company personnel who are to be evaluated to answer
questions during the course of inspection. The inspector should advise the operator that a
time and place will be scheduled at the conclusion of the inspection to review its findings.
2.1.6 Specific Inspection Procedures and Practices: Detailed guidance regarding the six areas
which should be evaluated at an Operator's Main Base are contained in the sections below.
2.2.1 Background and Objectives. CAR Section 8 - Series `O' Part II and Indian Aircraft Rules
requires operators to demonstrate a method of control and supervision of flight operations.
Section 5.4.4 of the ICAO Manual of Procedures for Operations Certification and Inspection
contains general information regarding operations control organizations and sets forth specific
areas to be inspected before an operator is certified. Annex 6 sets forth standards and
recommended practices regarding Flight Operations Officers/ Dispatchers.
2.2.2 An operational control inspection has two primary objectives. The first objective is to ensure
that the operator is in compliance with the minimum requirements of the Indian Aircraft Act and
Rules and CARs which conform to ICAO standards and recommended practices. The second
objective is to ensure that the operator's system of control provides positive assurance of
public safety. The Operator must meet both objectives to obtain and retain an operating
certificate or equivalent document. To make this determination, the inspector must evaluate
the operator to ensure the following:
(c) Applicable manuals contain adequate policy and guidance to allow operational control
personnel and flight crews to carry out their duties efficiently, effectively, and with a high
degree of safety.
(d) Operational Control Personnel are adequately trained, knowledgeable, and competent in the
performance of their duties.
(e) Flight Control personnel and flight crews have been provided with the necessary information
for the safe planning, control, and conduct of all flights.
(f) The Operator provides adequate facilities for operational control functions.
(g) The Operator performs all operational control functions required by the regulations.
(h) The Operator performs all functions necessary to provide adequate operational control in the
environment in which operations are conducted.
(i) Adequate Emergency Procedures and Contingency Plans have been formulated and
displayed at key positions.
2.2.3 General Inspection Practices and Procedures. Inspectors will conduct operational control
inspections through systematic manual reviews, records inspections, observations, and
interviews.
(a) Inspector Preparation and Manual Review. Before starting an operational control inspection,
the inspector must become familiar with the Operational Control provisions of the operator's
manuals. The manual review is both the first step in the inspection process and preparation
for subsequent steps. Such a review would be in addition to or in conjunction with the general
evaluation of the operator's documents/ manuals, and its purpose is to examine operations
control policy and guidance in depth. Additionally, Inspectors will review all findings/
deficiencies of previous Audit/Inspection in order to ensure identify areas of concern or
requiring special focus during the inspection.
(b) Observations, Interviews, and Records Checks. The inspector should establish with the
operator a mutually convenient time for conducting the interviews and records checks, and for
observing flight control functions.
(i) Inspectors should conduct interviews with both Management and Working-Level personnel to
meet inspection objectives. Inspectors should plan these interviews so that the required
information can be obtained without unduly distracting Personnel from their Duties and
Responsibilities.
(ii) Inspectors should observe actual flight-release operations. Before beginning the observation
of actual flight-release operations, an inspector should request a tour of the operator's facility
for general orientation. During this time, he may observe an Operations Control personnel
performing a variety of job functions. If possible, these observations should be made during
periods of peak activity, adverse weather, or during non-routine operations. Inspectors should
ask pertinent questions of personnel regarding their Individual duties and responsibilities and
relationship to the overall operations control effort.
(iii) Inspectors should observe competency checks being conducted to evaluate the knowledge
level of flight dispatchers and the performance of the supervisor. Inspector may also simulate
situations to access the competency of flight dispatchers.
(iv) Detailed guidance concerning Flight Operations (Trip) records and Flight and Duty Time
records is contained in Section 4 and 5 of this chapter respectively. Each area has its own
checklist and report form. These areas may be examined separately or in conjunction with the
remainder of the Operational Control inspection areas.
(i) The type of Operations that may and may not be conducted should be clearly specified in
manuals and other instructions (VFR, IFR, extended range, CAT II/III, Offshore etc)
(ii) Operator's policies applicable to each type of operation should be clearly stated.
(iii) Geographic areas and destinations to which extended overwater flights or EDTO operations
may be conducted should be clearly specified.
(b) Manuals.
(i) A section of the Operations Manual should be devoted to the policy and guidance for
Operational Control.
(ii) If the operator conducts extended overwater or extended range operations EDTO, a separate
section of the operations manual should contain key considerations regarding these types of
operations.
(c) The applicable section(s) of the Operations Manual should be readily available to Dispatchers
and Flight Crew while they perform their duties.
(d) Pre-Departure Functions. The responsibility and procedures for accomplishing the following
functions should be clearly defined and properly executed:
(vi) Control of MEL and CDL limitations. Required instruments and equipment should be installed
and operational.
(x) Adequate procedures for supervising and verifying these activities should be established.
(xi) The operator should have a means for the PIC and dispatcher to ensure that each of these
functions has been satisfactorily accomplished before the aircraft departs.
(i) The conditions under which a flight may and may not be dispatched (type of operation,
weather, crew compliment, load, etc.) should be clearly defined.
(ii) The conditions under which a flight must be re-routed, delayed, or cancelled should be
defined.
(iii) A written copy of weather reports and forecasts (including PIREP's) and NOTAM's should be
attached to the release and provided to the flight crew.
(iv) Extended overwater or extended range operations EDTO should be conducted under
instrument flight rules.
(v) Flight should not be commenced unless it is ascertained by every reasonable means that
airports to be used are adequate for the operation.
(i) The operator's procedures should provide for briefing of the PIC by the dispatcher.
(ii) The minimum content of the briefing should be specified and adequate.
(g) Dual Responsibility - If applicable - see Company Ops Manual for policy
(i) The signatures of both the PIC and the Dispatcher should be required on the flight dispatch
documents.
(ii) The PIC's obligation to operate the flight according to the release, or to obtain an amended
release, should be clearly stated.
(h) Flight-Following.
(i) The dispatcher’s Flight-Following Requirements and procedures should be clearly identified.
(ii) Policy and guidance should be provided to flight crews and dispatchers for monitoring fuel en
route.
(iii) Flight crew reporting requirements and procedures should be clearly stated.
(iv) There should be specified procedures for Dispatchers to follow when a required report is not
received.
(v) The Operator should maintain a record of communications between the dispatcher and the
flight.
(vii) En-route concerning hazardous conditions relating to aerodromes, navigation aids, etc., and
to report changes in forecast weather.
(i) Planned Re-release. If the operator uses planned re-release procedures in connection with
extended overwater operations, the following areas should be considered:
(i) A separate operational analysis should be prepared for the two routes and provided to either
the PIC dispatcher, or flight follower.
(iii) Re-release messages should be transmitted, acknowledged, and recorded. The message
should include all requirements including NOTAM and weather information.
(iv) The aircraft should meet landing performance requirements at the intermediate Destination.
(i) Policy concerning the PIC's latitude to deviate from a flight dispatch release without obtaining
a revised flight plan should be stated.
(ii) Specific and adequate direction and guidance should be provided to PIC's and dispatchers for
the actions to take when a flight cannot be completed as planned (such as destinations or
alternates below minimums, runways closed or restricted).
(iii) Procedures to follow in case of diversion or holding should be specifically and clearly stated.
(iv) Procedures to be followed in case of an emergency procedure which resulted in deviation from
local regulations or procedures should be clearly stated.
(k) Weather.
(iii) The operator have adequate procedures for updating weather information when the aircraft is
delayed on the ground.
(iv) The operator should have adequate procedures for providing the latest available weather
reports and forecasts to flight crews while the flight is en route.
(vi) The flight should not be released into known icing conditions unless equipped to cope with
such conditions.
(i) If release under VFR is permissible or authorized, the forecast and actual weather reports
should permit VFR flight over all portions of the route to be flown under visual flight rules.
(ii) IFR departure minimums should be consistent with CAR's and specific DGCA approvals.
(iii) Takeoff alternates should be named on the dispatch release when flights are released with
the -departure airport below landing minimums, and should meet the requirements of
CARs/applicable regulations on the subject.
(vi) Destination alternates should be named on the dispatch release when required by
CARs/applicable regulations on the subject
(vii)The weather at the named destination alternate airport should be equal to or better than that
required by applicable regulations.
(viii) Flights should not be continued toward the aerodrome of intended landing unless the latest
available information indicates that operating minima can be complied with.
(m) Minimum En Route Altitudes. The operator should establish minimum en route
altitudes for routes flown, which should not be lower than those established by the DGCA.
(i) Policy, direction, and guidance should be provided for the selection of takeoff, en route, and
destination alternates.
(o) Totalities
(ii) GPS (RAIM) NOTAMs, as applicable, should be provided to appropriate extended overwater
operations.
(iii) The operator should make adequate provisions for supplying airport and navigation
information to pilots and dispatchers.
(iv) The operator should have an adequate method for providing data to dispatchers on take-off
and landing minima at each airport. Dispatchers should have immediate access to such data.
(i) All increments of fuel required by the CARs (start & taxi, take-off to arrival at destination,
approach and landing, missed approach, alternate fuel, holding, and contingency) should be
provided. Special fuel provisions for extended range operations should be strictly adhered to.
(ii) Although this is not permissible, as a supplementary information for any contingency: If aircraft
are dispatched without an alternate, adequate contingency fuel should be carried for un-
forecast winds, terminal area delays, runway closures and contingencies.
(iii) Minimum fuel procedures should be specified for both dispatchers and PIC's and should be
adequate for the environment in which operations are conducted.
(i) The operator should take into account engine out performance rules when applicable to
specific routes and types of operations.
(iii) When possible, multiple ETP's should be provided for overwater flights and extended range
operations.
(iv) Adequate guidance should be available for drift down computations and fuel dump
requirements.
(r) Emergency Procedures. Emergency action procedures and checklists should be published
and readily available to operations control personnel for the following emergencies:
(ii) Crash.
(v) Hijacking.
(vi) Operator should have available lists containing information on the emergency and survival
equipment carried aboard its airplanes.
(vii)Provisions should be made to retain in safe custody the flight recorder of an airplane which
becomes involved in an accident.
(s) Changeover Procedures. During shift changes, an adequate overlap should be provided for
dispatchers and other flight operations control personnel to brief their oncoming counterparts.
Provisions should be made concerning the following communications and reports:
(iii) Coordination with ATS regarding operational instructions to aircraft in flight which change an
ATS flight plan.
(a) Qualification.
(i) All dispatchers should have undergone the approved course and be certified in accordance
with DGCA requirements.
(ii) Dispatchers should have successfully completed a refresher Course/competency check within
a required eligibility period.
(iii) Dispatchers whenever necessary should have completed route familiarization within a
specified time period.
(iv) Dispatchers at foreign locations should hold dispatched certificates from that country or
equivalent acceptable of DGCA.
(b) Duty Time. Shifts should be of a reasonable length and adequate rest time should be provided
between shifts.
(c) Supervisors.
(i) Working space should be adequate for the number of people working in the dispatch centre.
(ii) Temperature, lighting, and noise levels should be conducive to effective performance by
operations personnel.
(iv) Dispatchers should be supplied with all the information they require (such as: Flight Status,
Maintenance Status, Load, Weather, Facilities).
(v) Information should be effectively disseminated and displayed; and be quickly and accurately
located.
(vi) Real time weather displays should be available for adverse weather avoidance.
(vii)A dispatcher should be able to establish rapid and reliable voice communications with a
captain at the gate and to be able to deliver a message to a flight en route and get a response
within a reasonable time interval.
(viii) Dispatchers should be properly authorized and qualified to use all communications
channels required for operational control.
(ix) Direct voice communications should be available between the control centre and line stations
to the maximum extent possible.
(x) Backup communications links should be available in case of a failure of the primary links.
(xi) The operations control centre should have adequate communications with appropriate ATS
facilities.
(e) Management.
(i) Overall responsibility for operations in progress should be assigned by the operator to one
individual who can coordinate the activities of all the dispatchers.
(ii) Adequate internal communications links to allow control and to high-level management
officials should be firmly established.
(f) Workload.
(i) The operator should assign enough personnel to adequately handle the workload during
periods of both normal and non-routine operations.
(ii) Dispatchers should have enough time to perform both dispatch and flight-following duties in
an effective manner Dispatchers should not be used to perform other functions such as clerks,
maintenance inspectors, etc., to the detriment of their primary function.
(iii) Duty time restrictions for licensed personnel should be adhered to.
2.3.1 Background and Objective. CAR Section 8 - Series `O' Part VII and Indian Aircraft Rules states
than an operator shall provide, for the use and guidance of operations personnel, an
operations manual which will be amended or revised as is necessary to insure that information
contained therein is kept up to date. CAP 8100 sets forth specific information which must be
incorporated in the operations manual. It states that an operations manual, which may consist
of one or more separate volumes, should provide the necessary policy guidance and
instructions in a clear and concise manner to the applicant's personnel as to how the operation
is to be carried out.
2.3.2 The following paragraphs cover guidance on manual inspections, and is supplementary to the
information contained in CAP 8100 on the Preparation and Certification of Operations Manual.
This document should serve as the primary resource for FOI in evaluating an operator's
existing manual. The objective of an Ops Manual inspection is to substantiate that it:
(a) Implements Indian Aircraft Rules and CARs, and does not conflict with the regulations of any
other state where operations will be conducted.
(b) Provides clear, complete, and detailed instructions, policies, and procedures so that
operational staff are fully informed of what is required of them. Procedures should be effective
and represent sound safety philosophy.
(c) Presents necessary guidance and instructions to personnel in a suitable and convenient
format.
2.3.3 Specific Operations Manual Inspection Areas. Inspectors should review the Operations
Manual to ensure that it contains updated information in sufficient detail to permit alI flight
operations personnel to perform their duties safely and efficiently. The following areas should
be evaluated:
(a) Type quality, illustrations, and graphics should be clear and readable. Poorly copied pages
from manufacturers' data or from other manuals should not be acceptable.
(b) Validity and accuracy. Technical information contained in manuals such as performance
charts, limitations, weight and balance charts, MEL etc. should accurately reflect data updated
from the manufacturer or have been developed through the use of accepted and approved
methods.
(c) Currency and Conformity. Information contained in manuals should reflect current company
organization, equipment, procedures, and policies; DGCA CARs and other regulations and
technical data. The list of effective pages should be updated.
(d) Distribution and Availability. The operator should have an effective system for distributing
updated manuals. There should be no question as to who has responsibility for entering
changes in specific manuals.
(e) Approvals. A copy of all specific approvals mandated by the DGCA should be included in the
Manual.
2.4.1 Background and Objectives. CARs Section 8 - Series 'O' Part II and IV require that a flight
shall not be commenced until flight preparation forms have been completed certifying that the
PIC is satisfied that:
(a) The mass of the airplane is such that the flight can be conducted safely taking flight conditions
expected, and that the airplane load is properly distributed and safely secured.
(b) Operating limitations have been complied with and that instruments and equipment for the
particular type of operation to be undertaken are installed and sufficient for the flight.
(d) The airplane is airworthy and a Flight release has been issued.
2.4.2 These CAR require that completed flight preparation form be kept by the operator for a
specified period. Flight preparation forms meeting the above requirements and conforming to
DGCA regulations commonly take the following forms: the load manifest, the dispatch or flight
release, the operational and ATS flight plans, and the maintenance or airworthiness release.
2.4.3 The primary objective of operations and flight records inspections is to ensure that operators
meet established operator procedures and appropriate civil aviation regulations for the proper
preparation and retention of operational trip records. Inspectors can evaluate trip records to
reconstruct a particular flight or a series of flights by examining flight plans, dispatch or flight
releases, loading and weight documents, weather documents, and other related flight
information retained by the operator. The inspector's evaluation provides the DGCA with the
methods of information acquisition and dissemination used by the operator.
2.4.4 Trip Records Inspection Areas. Operations and flight (Trip) records may be broken down into
five general areas as follows:
(a) General Inspection Area. This inspection area refers to those inspection elements that are
common to all trip records. Inspectors should evaluate such items as record availability,
practicality, legibility, currency, continuity, and conformity as they related to regulatory record
keeping requirements. Inspectors should ensure that each trip record package they examine
contains all of the required information and that it pertains to the actual flight it represents.
Each document should have a date, flight number or a trip number, and an aircraft registration
number which clearly identifies the applicable flight.
(b) Flight Plan transparency: This inspection area refers to the flight planning requirements which
may be applied to most aircraft operations. Inspectors should evaluate flight plan content.
Many operators incorporate the operational flight plan and the dispatch/ flight release into one
document. This is acceptable and reduces the duplication of information that may be required
by both documents.
(v) Proposed route, cruising altitude (or flight level), and true airspeed at the cruising altitude.
(vii)Point of first-intended landing and the estimated elapsed time until' over that point.
(x) Number of persons in the aircraft, except where that information is otherwise readily available
to the DGCA.
(xi) Any other information the PIC or ATS believes is necessary for ATS purposes.
(d) Dispatch Release Inspection Area. A dispatch is normally executed and signed by both the
PIC and the dispatcher. The dispatch release should contain the following information:
(iii) Departure airport, intermediate stops, destination airports, and alternate airports.
(vi) Weather reports and forecast for the destination airport, each intermediate stop, and any
alternate airport that is the latest information available at the time the dispatch is signed.
(vii) NOTAM'S, fuel slips, route certification requirements (if applicable), and other documents
that may be issued to flight crew members before each flight
(e) With regard to minimum fuel required, CARs Section 8 Series `O' Part II and IV requires
operators to keep fuel and oil records for the specified period. Inspectors should examine
records to ensure that they include an annotation of the minimum fuel required to conduct the
flight, and that this fuel load is in accordance with applicable Civil Aviation Regulations. Many
operators will provide a breakdown of fuel loads such as trip fuel, alternate fuel reserve fuel,
and holding fuel. When examining fuel figures, inspectors should cross- check the dispatch or
flight release fuel quantity (or weight) with the load manifest fuel quantity (or weight) to ensure
that the figures are the same. Additionally, inspectors must ensure that the operator's flight
plan includes the amount of fuel on board (in hours), and that this figure agrees with the figures
for the amount of fuel annotated on both the flight release and the load manifest. Inspectors
may obtain hourly fuel burn information from the cruise control charts in the applicable Aircraft
Operating Manual (AFM/ RFM).
(f) The operator must comply with prescribed time limits for the validity of a dispatch or flight
release. If flights are delayed beyond a prescribed time, they must be re-released prior to
departure. To ensure the operator is rereleasing flights as required, inspectors should
determine the actual departure times from company logs, ATC tower logs, or some other
means, and then compare those times with the dispatch or flight release time (as applicable).
(g) Load manifest inspection Area. Each trip records package, regardless of the type of operation,
should contain aircraft weight, balance (CG), and loading information. Passenger and cargo
weight information must be accurately reflected on the load manifest. Inspectors should
inspect and validate the operator's loading documents to ensure their accuracy and
compliance with the CARs, manufacturer's data, and the aircraft load data sheet.
(h) Operators may have systems which result in weight and balance "finals" being transmitted to
the flight crew via ACARS or company radio frequencies after the aircraft has departed the
gate or ramp area. This information, which normally consists of adjusted take-off gross weight
and trim settings, is critical to the crew members for accurately determining the take-off data.
Inspectors should ensure that the information contained on the load manifest accurately
portrays the actual passenger and cargo weights. And that adequate procedures are in place
in the SOP’s/ Ops Manual for such crew workload requirements.
(a) Flight/ Service records inspections are normally conducted at the operator's principal base of
operations. Operators should have established a system where transit stations forward all trip
records information to one central location where the information is retained for the required
time period. Some operators may have most of their trip records information stored in a
computerized format.
(b) Inspectors should contact the operator's personnel responsible for maintaining trip record files
and advise them that an inspection shall be conducted. Upon arriving at the record keeping
location, the inspectors) should properly identify himself and request records for a specific
series of trips. This ensures that the operator has an effective series of trips. This ensures that
the operator has an effective means of storing record information and is capable of retrieving
specific trip information at the DGCA's request. Inspectors should also request space at the
operator's facility to conduct the inspection. It is not recommended that inspectors to remove
trip records from the operator's facility.
(c) Before conducting the actual inspection, inspectors should familiarize themselves with the
operator's trip records procedures, formats, and means of disseminating information to flight
crews. If the inspector has previously completed an operational control inspection of the
operator, he should already have a-working knowledge of the operator's system. Inspectors
should pre-plan the inspection by deciding which specific areas should be concentrated upon,
such as listing alternates, accurate fuel loads, dispatch release time versus actual blackout
time, and accurate and timely weather information.
(d) During the conduct of the actual inspection, inspectors should examine all of the available
documents for each flight and cross-check the information between the trip records. For
example, the fuel load on a dispatch release should agree with the fuel load on the load
manifest, the flight plan, and the fuel slip (if available).
2.5.1 Background and Objectives. CARs Section 8 Series `O' Part II and IV state that an operator
shall formulate rules limiting the flight time and duty periods of flight crew members. Standards
for flight time and duty periods for various categories of crew are currently given in CARs
Section 7 Series J Part I/ II/ III as applicable. These rules also make provisions for adequate
rest periods and are designed to ensure that fatigue occurring either in a flight or successive
flight or accumulated over a period of time due to these and other tasks, does not endanger
the safety does not endanger the safety of the flight.
2.5.2 CARs Section 7 Series J Part I/ II/ III further states that an operator shall maintain current
records of flight time of all crew members. Paragraph 5.4.3.2 of the ICAO Doc 8335 Manual
of Procedures for operations Certification and Inspection recommends that flight records be
examined to check compliance with statutory regulations relating to flight and duty time
limitations.
2.5.3 Inspection Areas. Operators must develop methods for recording and monitoring flight and
duty time for flight crew the regulatory limitations are not exceeded. Such a record keeping
system should have the following attributes:
(a) Adequacy. The record keeping forms which the operator uses are adequate for recording
essential information which the DGCA requires including information on time spent in office
by executive pilots before immediately commencing flying duties.
(b) Practicality. The operator's method for recording flight time for individual crew members should
be easy for employees to use. Forms which are developed for this purpose should be
unambiguous and easy to complete. If an operator uses ACARS or a similar system for
reporting flight and duty time, personnel should be properly trained in its use.
(c) Accessibility and Security. Data regarding flight and duty time should be readily accessible to
personnel which have responsibility for monitoring compliance with various time intervals.
Records should be secure from tampering by unauthorized individuals.
(d) Currency. Data available to personnel responsible for ensuring that individual crewmembers
do not exceed regulatory or contractual requirements should be updated expeditiously. The
system used by the operator should- provide that schedulers and/ or flight control personnel
are immediately aware when the prescribed limits may be exceeded. Flight time totals from
written crew logs must be expeditiously transmitted to the scheduling or flight control office,
so that totals may be promptly updated.
(e) Accuracy. The system should faithfully track daily flight and duty time for crew members, and
accurately reflect totals for longer prescribed time limitations.
(f) Conformity. The records should reflect conformance with regulatory flight and duty time
limitations.
(a) At the commencement of the inspection, inspectors should receive a briefing from responsible
employees of the operator regarding their flight and duty time record keeping system in its
entirety. The inspector should then review a sufficient number of records for individual crew
members to ensure that regulatory requirements are being met. Figures which are used in
flight time summaries (cumulative totals) to track required time intervals should be checked
against original flight logs or similar records to ensure that times for specific flights are being
accurately recorded and totalled. Similarly, a flight time which appears on flight logs and
summaries may be checked against maintenance or payroll records for continuity.
(b) If individual crew members participate in more than one type of operation for which different
regulatory requirements exist (e.g. domestic vs. international), the inspector should determine
that the operator has devised methods to ensure that corresponding flight and duty time
limitations are not exceeded.
(c) Inspectors should indicate the scope of their records inspections in the comments section of
the report form (i.e. number of individual airmen records inspected, time interval covered,
cross-checks with other records).
(a) CARs Section 8 Series O Parts II and IV require that operators establish and maintain a ground
and flight training program, approved by the DGCA which ensures that all flight crew members
are adequately trained to perform their assigned duties. In order to accomplish this, the
operator should have adequate ground and flight training facilities and adequately trained
instructors. Inspections of the many components of such a training program are an important
part of an overall DGCA surveillance program. These inspections are best planned and
executed over a period of time that permits a thorough and ongoing evaluation of an operator's
training program.
(b) The primary objective of a training program inspection is to ensure that the operator's overall
training program continues to provide quality instruction by conducting an evaluation of training
program curriculums, facilities, instructors, check Aircrew, courseware, instructional delivery
methods, and testing and/or checking procedures, which were previously approved by
the DGCA.
(c) Training program inspections also provide the DGCA with the ability to require changes in an
operator's training program, to rescind an initially or finally approved program (or segments of
that program), and to maintain a current and accurate appraisal of the program's status and
ability to train competent and capable flight crewmembers.
2.6.2 Training Program Inspections Areas. Training programs vary widely in their complexity
depending on the operator's size, aircraft fleet diversification, number of crewmembers,
training locations, and scope of operation. Training program inspections involve much more
than simply observing and evaluating training in progress. Six primary inspection areas may
be identified as areas to be observed and evaluated. These six areas are the same areas that
should be evaluated before granting either initial or final approval (as applicable) during the
training approval process. Because these areas are broad in terms of scope and context, they
are organized into inspection "modules" to provide the inspection with a flexible inspection
strategy. This means the inspector has more latitude in terms of scheduling specific types of
inspections, maximizing inspection resource capabilities, and in determining the sequence of
the various types of inspections to be conducted. Specific guidance regarding these six areas
is as follows:
(a) Training Curricula Inspection Area. Inspectors should evaluate the operator's approved
training curricula. Inspectors should ensure that these training curricula are consistent with the
approved syllabus for the type of operation being conducted. The inspector should evaluate
the curricula and their associated outlines that are currently being used by the operator. The
inspector should ensure that the curriculum outlines contain enough descriptive detail to
ensure that the main features of each principal subject will be addressed during the course of
instruction. The inspector should maintain a copy of each initially or finally approved training
curriculum for every operator. This is usually the best source document available for inspectors
to review before evaluating currently used curriculum outlines. Inspectors should evaluate
each of the operator's curriculum outlines to ensure that the subject matter is current and
appropriate in depth and scope, and also to gain an adequate understanding of what kinds of
subject matter will be observed and evaluated during later phases of the inspection. The
following is a list of basic curricula typical of both domestic and international operators. These
should be reviewed for all crewmember positions and dispatchers:
(vii)Special Curriculum.
(b) Many operators conduct training which is in addition to the regulatory training requirements.
Because this additional training is part of the overall approved program, it would also be
subject to inspection and evaluation by the DGCA.
(c) Courseware Inspection Area. Inspectors should examine an operator's courseware, such as
lesson plans, instructor guides, computer software or audiovisual programs, and hand-outs.
The courseware should be examined to ensure that it is consistent with the curriculum outline
and be organized to permit effective instructional delivery. The courseware should also be
examined to ensure it is current, effective and germane to the various instructional delivery
methods.
(d) Instructional Delivery Methods Inspection Area. Inspectors should ensure that the operator's
various instructional delivery methods, such as lectures, workshops, slide tape presentations,
training devices, and simulators are sufficient to convey information to a student. These
methods should be evaluated to ensure that they are effectively creating a transfer of learning
to the student, that they are being maintained as originally approved, and that they are updated
as necessary.
(e) Testing and Checking Inspection Area. Para 1 of Annex 6, Paragraph 9.3.1 requires that a
training program shall include examination to determine competence. Paragraph 9.4.4
requires that pilots receive proficiency or competency checks. Observing testing and checking
is the primary method by which in inspector can determine if learning has occurred. In this
inspection area the inspector can evaluate the operator's standards, reflected by pass/ fail
rates, which determine whether a desired level of knowledge and skill has been acquired by
the students being trained. The inspector should examine the operator's training records to
ensure the operator's regulatory compliance with testing, checking, and other training program
requirements. Additionally, check aircrew and instructor programs should be examined as the
functional quality control element within this area.
(f) Surveillance Information Inspection Area. During training inspections, inspectors should
analyze previous inspection results for deficiencies in specific training program areas.
Inspectors in charge should use previous inspection data when planning training program
inspections to establish special emphasis or other unique evaluation requirements.
(a) The five primary inspection areas previously outlined should constitute the core areas of an
operator's training programme that were evaluated by the DGCA before the issuance of final
approval. These inspection areas apply to all operators and vary only in their complexity from
operator to operator.
(b) In certain situations, there may be a requirement for the DGCA to initiate a "special emphasis"
training program inspection of one or more specific areas. This type of inspection may be
initiated for several reasons such as an incident, an accident, or a series of deficiencies
discovered through trend analysis of surveillance data. Special emphasis training program
inspections usually focus on a limited area, such as use of checklists or wind shear training,
and are relatively short in duration.
(c) Before the inspector can inspect any particular training program area, the inspector should
introduce themselves to the instructor or check aircrew conducting the training and display
their DGCA credentials. The inspector should then inform them that a DGCA inspection of
training in progress will be conducted. Inspectors should refrain from active participation in the
training being conducted and should make every effort not to influence the training
environment or the instruction in the subject matter. If an inspector has comments on any of
the areas of training being conducted, the inspector should reserve the comments for the
debriefing with the instructor or check aircrew after the training session.
2.6.4 Specific Training Program Inspection Modules. Key elements of the six primary inspection
areas may be organized into inspection "modules" to enhance inspection scheduling, tracking,
analysis of results, and to serve as the most efficient use of inspector resources. Any
inspection module may be conducted as an independent inspection. The following inspection
modules may be considered to be the "core" training program inspection requirements:
(a) Training Curriculum Inspection Module. The inspector should evaluate each of the operator's
approved (initial or final) training curricula, primarily for format and content. Ideally, each
should contain the following:
(i) Title. Each curriculum should be appropriately titled with a specific crewmember position (or
positions, such as PIC/FO) and the relevant category of training.
(ii) List of Effective Pages. Each curriculum should have a list of effective pages and a means to
record revisions.
(iii) Approvals. Each page of the curriculum (for finally approved programs) should be signed,
dated, and stamped by the inspector or an appropriate designee.
(iv) Detail. Each curriculum should include comprehensive outlines of course material contained
therein in sufficient detail to determine adequacy of coverage.
(v) Hours. The total number of training hours should be specified for each curriculum.
(vii)Currency. The information contained in each curriculum should be current and may not be
contrary to the regulations or safe operating practices. Company bulletins, notices, information
letters and other means of conveying new or revised information to crewmembers should have
been, or are in the process of being, incorporated into the appropriate curriculum.
(viii) Conformity. Scope and content of each curriculum should conform to DGCA requirements.
(b) Instructor Courseware Inspection Module. In this module, the inspector should evaluate the
operator's instructor guides, lesson plans, and/or training outlines. Ideally, this courseware
should have the following characteristics:
(i) Title. Instructor courseware should be clearly titled for the appropriate curriculum.
(ii) Detail. It should contain sufficient information to permit the instructor to conduct detailed
instruction for each subject area.
(iii) Practicality. It should contain instructional material in a logical order and sequence that is
relatively easy to use.
(v) References. It should have references to the applicable operator's manuals and publications.
(vi) Validation. Instructor courseware should include some means for determining that the
students are properly assimilating the instructed material (such as "responder" panels,
multiple- choice questions, or in-class exercises).
(c) Student Courseware Inspection Module. In this module, the inspector should evaluate the
information in all of the various "self-teaching" training mediums such as video tapes, audio-
visual slide presentations, computer-based training presentations, programmed learning
publications, and home-study materials, as follows:
(i) Consistency. The information should be consistent with the curriculum outline and should be
current with information in the operator's manual and other publications.
(ii) Detail. It should have sufficient detail to ensure that students can clearly understand the
applicable subject area.
(iii) Validation. The courseware should include some means of testing student assimilation of
information presented.
(d) Training Facilities/Environment Inspection Module. The inspector should evaluate the
operator's training facilities in this inspection module, as follows:
(i) The training facilities and the instructional environment should be conducive to learning by
providing adequate seating space for students, storage areas for training materials, and
facilities for instructors to prepare their lessons.
(e) Ground Instructor inspection Module. The inspector should evaluate the quality of instruction
provided by ground instructors as follows:
(i) Training. Instructors should be adequately trained in accordance with the operator's approved
program and be appropriately documented in the operator's training records.
(ii) The facility should be free of distractions which adversely affect instructional delivery, such as
excessive temperatures, extraneous noise, poor lighting, and cramped classrooms and/or
work spaces.
(iii) Knowledge. Instructors should be knowledgeable in the specific area of instruction and in the
operator's training policies and procedures, form completion requirements.
(iv) Instructional Technique and Delivery. Instructors should exhibit satisfactory instructional
methods and techniques. They should be able to present the material in a logical, cleat, and
organized manner.
(v) Adherence. Instructors should follow the applicable lesson plans, guides or other training aids
to ensure the material is properly presented as designed.
(f) Flight Instructor Module. During evaluations of flight training, the instructor should adhere to
the events listed for the specific flight training curriculum. Instructors may deviate when
necessary, however, to accommodate events from previous or subsequent flight training
sessions. Every effort should be expended to alleviate artificiality from the training session and
the instructor should be accorded a certain measure of flexibility to ensure the highest level of
realistic training is achieved. In addition to the areas listed above, flight instructors should be
evaluated in the following specific areas:
(i) Proficiency. Flight Instructors should be highly proficient in the operation of aircraft, flight
simulators and training devices, and in the performance of manoeuvres and procedures which
they are teaching.
(ii) Briefing. Flight instructors should provide a thorough pre-flight briefing (for flight training
devices, flight simulators, or the aircraft) on all manoeuvres and procedures that will be
conducted.
(iii) Debriefing. Flight instructors should provide a thorough post flight debriefing to review each
individual student's performance during a training session.
(iv) Evaluation. Flight instructors should properly evaluate student progress and provide or
recommend additional training when necessary.
(g) Training Aids and Equipment inspection Module. The inspector should evaluate the operator's
training aide and equipment such as audio-visual equipment, systems mock-up boards, panel
layouts, ground training devices, instructor station equipment, student responders (if
applicable), and other related items, in terms of equipment. Ideally, the following conditions
will prevail:
(i) Instructions for use. Any equipment designated to be used for "self-teaching" purposes (such
as CBT platforms) should have clear operating instructions readily available for the student's
use.
(ii) Condition. All equipment used in the training program should operate and function in good
working order (Replacement parts or components such as slide projector lamps, should be
readily available.
(iii) Fidelity. Systems panels, layouts, boards, or mock-ups (Such as aircraft exit mock-ups) should
accurately represent the designated aircraft.
(h) Flight Simulator/Training Device Inspection Module. It is not intended for the inspector to
conduct an extensive flight evaluation of the training device or simulator but rather to evaluate
the following: The general condition of the equipment, any significant periods of "down time"
(and the reasons for the down time), and the operator's general ability to maintain the
equipment as approved. The inspector should evaluate the operator's flight simulators and/or
flight training devices, as follows:
(i) Approval. Flight simulators and flight training devices should be approved by the DGCA and
periodically inspected. Inspectors should review the operator's record of simulator evaluations
and approval information to ensure compliance.
(ii) Condition. Flight simulators and flight training devices should function at the same level as
when they were initially approved. Inoperative or defective equipment should be properly
documented along with the training events that are affected by the inoperative or defective
components.
(iii) Publications. Published instrument approach charts, SID'S, STAR'S, en route charts, and
other information (such as aircraft performance manuals and takeoff/ landing data charts)
should be current and in generally good condition.
(i) Check Aircrew and Examiners Inspection module. The inspector should evaluate the following
elements:
(i) Staffing. The number of check aircrew and examiners employed by the operator should be
adequate for the level of training and checking activity.
(ii) Training and qualification. Training records should reflect that Check Aircrew and Examiners
are qualified in accordance with applicable regulations and the operator's approved training
program.
(iii) Standardization. The operator should have an effective standardization program to ensure
that check aircrew conduct training skill test and proficiency checks in a uniform manner.
(iv) Level of Activity. The number of examinations that a check aircrew conducts each year should
be sufficient to maintain currency proficiency in performing the performance of his duties.
(v) Oral and Practical Tests. The inspector should evaluate the conduct the tests or checks in
progress. Inspectors should observe and/or conduct a sufficient number of aircrew certification
evaluations as well as proficiency, competency, or line' checks (as applicable) to determine
the overall effectiveness of the operator's training, check aircrew programs, and testing and/or
checking standards. Testing and checking standards should comply with regulations and safe
operating practices.
(j) Quality Control Module. In this module the inspector should evaluate the operator's quality
control program to ensure that training effectiveness is continually monitored and that specific
areas or items are corrected when necessary. Specific modules should be identified in the
ground and flight curriculums as progress evaluations". The operator's quality control system
should ensure that students do not proceed to the next level of training until satisfactory
proficiency has been achieved. Additionally, training folders should be maintained by the
operator while students are in a specific curriculum. Inspectors should review the information
contained in these folders to identify any deficient trends. This information, coupled with the
results of testing and checking, provides a quantifiable method for measuring training
effectiveness.
2.6.5 Use Of Data Accumulated From Training Program Inspections. Inspectors can use previous
inspection results as a source of information about an operator's overall performance. A high
rate of satisfactory performance usually indicates a strong, effective training program.
Repeated cases of unsatisfactory performance indicate serious deficiencies in an operator's
training program. Results of inspection reports, incident or accident reports, enforcement
actions, and other relevant information about the operator's performance should be reviewed
by the DGCA for indications of training effectiveness. For example, repeated reports of
deficiencies such as configuring too late, incomplete briefings, or incorrect use of the
checklists, may be traceable to a lack of specific training or ineffective training in a particular
area.
2.7.1 Background and Objective. Paragraph 9.6.5.6 of the ICAO Manual of Procedures for
operations Certification and Inspection states that inspectors should ensure that records are
available for each company employee who is required to receive flight, ground, simulator,
emergency, or operational control training to confirm that:
(a) Appropriate training prescribed in the approved training program has been conducted as and
when required.
(b) Such records reflect each individual’s attendance, participation, aptitude, or performance.
(c) Adequate and accurate records are being maintained and retained in accordance with
applicable regulations.
(a) A file refers to a collection of records of training events for a specific employee which is
maintained in a folder, binder or computer database.
(b) A record refers to an individual record of a training or qualification even which is completed by
the instructor or examiner and placed in an employee’s file.
(c) A flight operations personnel refers to pilots, flight engineers, flight operations inspectors
(dispatchers), and flight attendants.
2.7.3 Essentially, the operator should develop forms and maintain records which are sufficient to
establish the qualification and currency of each flight operations person for the position that
he or she occupies at the time the inspection is conducted. By reviewing training records, the
inspector should be able to establish a chronology of training and qualification events which
render an individual fully qualified to perform the duties to which he is presently assigned, in
accordance with DCGA’s regulations and the operator's approved training manual. Each
record of a training event in an individual’s file should contain the following information as a
minimum:
(a) Specific type of training or qualification conducted the terminology employed should reflect
that contained in the operator's approved training program, (e.g. "A-320 pilot Recurrent
Ground Training").
The ICAO manual for Operations Certification and Inspection recommends that en route
inspections be conducted as a means of evaluating both cockpit and cabin crew members.
The primary objective of Cockpit En-route Inspections is for an Inspector to observe and
evaluate the in flight operations of an operator within the total operational environment of the
air transportation system. En route inspections are one of the most effective methods of
accomplishing air transportation surveillance objectives and responsibilities. These
inspections provide the DGCA with an opportunity to assess elements of the aviation system
that are both internal and external to an operator.
3.1.1 Elements of the aviation system which are internal to the operator and can be observed during
Cockpit En route Inspections include:
(a) Crewmembers.
3.1.2 Elements of the aviation system which are external to the operator and can be observed during
en route inspections include:
(h) Communications
3.2.1 Inspectors should consider all inspection areas, both internal and external to the operator to
be of equal importance. Four general inspection areas may be identified for observation and
evaluation:
(a) Crewmember.
(c) Airport.
3.2.2 The Cockpit En Route Inspection Job Aid is placed at Annex 23 to CAP 8200. The Checklist/
Report form is divided into the four areas listed above. The remainder of this chapter is
structured around this form.
(a) The "crewmember" inspection applies primarily to flight (cockpit) crewmembers, but cabin
crewmembers may also be observed in certain areas such as coordination with the cockpit.
Inspectors should evaluate such items as flight crewmember knowledge, ability, and
proficiency by directly observing crewmembers performing their respective duties and
functions. The checklist/ report form contains a list of remainder items which should be
observed in the crewmember inspection area. These items are not all-inclusive but represent
the types of items which are common to several phases of flight and which inspectors should
evaluate during a typical cockpit en-route inspection.
(b) The "flight conduct" inspection area is by far the largest and most complex. It relates to specific
phases of flight which can be observed during an en-route inspection. The checklist/ report
form contains a list of the items that should be evaluated by inspectors during these phases
of flight. These items are not all-inclusive and in some cases (such as "power back”) may not
be applicable to the flight conducted. Inspectors are, however, encouraged to observe,
evaluate, and report on as many of these items as possible.
(c) The "airport" inspection area pertains to the various elements of airports which may be
observed during flights such as runways, taxiways, ramp/aprons, and aircraft ground
movements. Inspectors should observe and evaluate as elements as possible.
(d) The "ATC/ Airspace" inspection area pertains to the various elements of Air Traffic Control
and national or international airspace systems. These elements should be observed and
evaluated by inspectors during en route inspections. From an operational standpoint, these
evaluations are a valuable information source which can be used not only to enhance safety
with respect to air traffic control and the airspace system, but also to enhance the effectiveness
of en route and terminal facilities and procedures.
3.2.3 Deficiencies in the "Crewmember" and "Flight Conduct" inspection areas may indicate
weaknesses in the operator's training and checking program.
3.2.4 Although these four general inspection areas cover a wide range of items, they are not the
only areas that can be observed and evaluated during cockpit en route inspections. Inspectors
may have the opportunity to evaluate many other operations functions, such as transit base
operations and flight control procedures. Such functions can often be observed before a flight
begins, at en route stops, or at the termination of a flight. Inspectors should include any
remarks regarding such areas in the comments section of the checklist.
3.3.1 Before conducting en route inspections, it is important that inspectors be thoroughly familiar
with the operating procedures and facilities used by the operator. An inspector can obtain such
information by reviewing pertinent sections of the operations manual and is encouraged to
comment in the inspection report on any procedure believed to be deficient or unsafe. He
should also debrief the flight crew at the conclusion of the flight regarding any deficiencies
which he intends to note in the inspection report.
3.3.2 Each operator should have established procedures to be used by inspectors for scheduling
the cockpit observer's seat (jump seat). Inspectors should make arrangements to be present
in the cockpit far in advance as possible. However, since an inspector may experience a
sudden change in his schedule and may thus not always be able to provide appropriate
advance notice, operator's procedures should be flexible so as to permit use of an available
jump seat on short notice.
3.3.3 A cockpit en route inspection is a routine surveillance function which is distinct from a route
check required by CARs. Its purpose should be to observe and evaluate the entire cockpit
crew - Captain and the First Officer, and Flight Engineer if applicable - in the performance of
the full range of their duties during regularly scheduled flights. Thus, it should be accomplished
from the jump seat with as little disruption to the cockpit routine as possible. En route
inspections should be scheduled so as not to interfere with required check flights by company
check aircrew or with orientation flights for pilots under training who occupy the observer’s
seat. Should an inspector arrive for a flight and find that the jump seat is occupied by pilot
under training, he must determine whether or not it is essential that the cockpit en route
inspection be conducted on that flight. If it is essential, the operator should be so advised and
should make the jump seat available to the inspector.
3.3.4 An inspector should begin a cockpit en route inspection a reasonable amount of time before
the flight (approximately 1 hour) by reporting to the operations area or to the gate, according
to established procedures. He should complete any necessary jump seat related paperwork
for inclusion in the operator's passenger manifest and weight and balance documents. The
inspector should introduce himself to the flight crew, if not already known to them, and inform
the PIC of his intention to conduct an en route inspection. The inspector should then request
that the flight crew present their pilot’s licenses and medical endorsements to him for
examination. It is desirable that the inspector review with the flight crew prior to boarding the
aircraft such items as weather documents, NOTAMS, planned route of flight dispatch or flight
release documents and information about the airworthiness of the aircraft.
3.3.5 Sometimes an inspector cannot meet and inform the PIC of the intention to conduct an en
route inspection before boarding the aircraft. In such a case, as soon as possible after
boarding the aircraft the inspector should introduce himself to the PIC, present his
identification, and inform the flight crew of his intention to conduct a cockpit inspection. In this
situation a flight attendant will usually be at the main cabin entrance door. One of the flight
attendant's primary duties should be to ensure that only authorized persons enter the aircraft
such as ticketed passengers, caterers, and authorized company personnel. Therefore, an
inspector should be prepared to present his identification and any applicable jump seat
paperwork to the flight attendant before entering the cockpit. When boarding the aircraft, an
inspector should also avoid unnecessarily impeding passenger flow or interrupting flight
attendants during the performance of their duties. Also, during this time an inspector may have
ample opportunity to observe and evaluate the operator’s carry-on baggage procedures and
the gate agents or flight attendants actions concerning oversized items. Once inside the
cockpit, the inspector should request an inspection of' each flight crewmembers licences when
convenient. He should review the journey logbook to determine the airworthiness of the
aircraft, and request that the flight crew provide him with the trip documents (Flight plan, Load
sheet, etc.) for his review when it does not interfere with their duties.
3.3.6 The inspector must wear a headset during the flight. During cockpit en route inspections;
inspectors must try to avoid diverting the attention of flight crew members performing their
duties during critical phases of flight such as approaches and landings. Inspectors must be
alert and point out to the flight crew any apparent hazards such as conflicting traffic. If during
an en route inspection, an inspector becomes aware that the flight crew is violating any
regulation, company policy, or an ATC clearance, the inspector should immediately inform the
PIC of the situation.
3.4.1 Once situated in the cockpit, the inspector should check the jump seat oxygen and emergency
equipment (if applicable) and connect the headset to the appropriate interphone system. The
PIC or a designated crewmember should offer to give the inspector a safety briefing. If the PIC
does not make such an offer, the inspector should request a briefing. Although the inspector
may be qualified on the aircraft and well known to the PIC, this will permit him to evaluate the
jump seat safety briefing which the PIC or First inspector should give to any jump seat rider.
It is important that the inspector monitor all radio frequencies being used by the flight crew to
properly evaluate ATC procedures, flight crew compliance, transmission clarity, and radio
phraseology. The monitoring of these frequencies also ensures that the inspector does not
inadvertently interfere with any flight crew communications. Inspectors should continuously
monitor these frequencies to remain aware of the progress of the flight. The following major
areas will be observed and evaluated:
3.4.2 Crewmembers. Inspectors will have the opportunity to evaluate crewmembers in the following
areas which are common to many or all phases of flight:
(i) AOM - Specific aircraft limits, systems, equipment, procedures, and flight profiles.
(ii) FOM or equivalent - General company policy and procedures related to crew conduct and type
of operation.
(iii) DGCA regulations and ICAO International standards and recommended practices -
appropriate to the type of operation conducted
(iv) Airway Manuals - Interpretation and application of approach plates, STARs, SIDs, airport and
transit base information, communications, etc.
(v) MEL/ CDL - Familiarization to the extent that specific items can be expeditiously located and
information properly interpreted and applied.
(vi) Checklists - cockpit flow and responses to challenges in normal checklists, knowledge of
where to locate and an understanding of the philosophy behind abnormal and emergency
procedures.
(vii)General body of aviation knowledge commensurate with level of licence and experience: ATC,
weather, aerodynamics, power plants, radar interpretation, etc.
(c) Proficiency - skill in applying the above knowledge to specific phases of flight and in
manipulating aircraft controls and systems at the assigned crewmember position.
(e) Conformity - to provisions of AOM, FOM, Other company bulletins and instructions, DGCA
regulations, ICAO standards and practices, ATC practices and specific instructions, MEL/
MMEL/CDL, and airway manual. Attention should be given to:
(g) Coordination - between cockpit crewmembers (cockpit resource management) and between
cockpit and cabin crewmembers.
(h) Use of checklists - prompt and consistent use of requirement checklists during appropriate
phase of flight.
(i) Requirement equipment - flashlight, cockpit key, headset, and other such personal items
which may be required by DGCA regulations or company policy.
3.4.3 Phase of Flight. Some of the areas that should be observed and evaluated during each specific
flight phase are as follows-.
(a) Pre-flight: Inspectors should determine that the flight crew has all the necessary flight
information including the appropriate weather, dispatch, or flight release information; flight
plan; NOTAM'S; and weight and balance information. MEL items should be resolved in
accordance with the operators MEL and appropriate maintenance procedures. Inspectors
should observe the flight crew performing appropriate exterior and interior pre-flight duties in
accordance with the operator’s procedures.
(b) Pre-departure: Inspectors should observe the flight crew accomplishing all pre-departure
checklists, take-off performance calculations, and required ATC communications. If a Flight
Management System (FMS) is installed, setup and data entry should be observed. If INS or
Omega is installed, data entry and verification should be observed. Flight crew should verify
fuel quantity indications against amount delivered and/or physically check tanks. The flight
crew should use coordinated communications (via hand signals or the aircraft interphone) with
ground personnel. Crew should properly monitor engine starts. Often pushback or power back
clearance must be obtained from the appropriate ATC or apron control facility.
(d) When weight and balance information is transmitted to the aircraft by company radio during
the outbound taxi, the flight crew should follow the operator's procedures as to which
crewmember receives the information and completes the final take-off performance
calculations, and which crewmember monitors the ATC frequency.
(e) Take-off: The take-off procedure should be accomplished as outlined in the operator's manual.
Inspectors should observe and evaluate the following terms or activities during the take-off
phase
(f) Climb: The climb procedure should be conducted according to the operator’s manual.
Inspectors should observe and evaluate the following items and activities during the climb
phase of flight:
(i) Compliance with the ATC departure clearance or with the appropriate published departure.
(g) Cruise: Procedures used during cruise flight should conform to the operator’s procedures.
Inspectors should observe and evaluate the following areas during the cruise phase of flight:
(v) Monitoring flight plan (actual vs. planned fuel consumption and flight time).
(ix) Vigilance - proper visual lookout and crewmembers at stations except to attend to
physiological needs.
(h) Descent: Procedures used during descents should conform to the operator’s procedures.
Inspectors should observe and evaluate the following areas before and during the descent
phase of flight:
(xii)Briefings, as appropriate,
(xv) Vigilance.
(i) Approach: Procedures used during the selected approach (instrument or visual) should be
accomplished according to the operators manuals. Inspectors should observe and evaluate
the following areas during the approach phase of flight
(j) Landing: Procedures used during the landing manoeuvre should conform to those outlines in
the operators manoeuvres and procedures documents. Inspectors should observe and
evaluate the following areas during the landing phase of flight:
(k) Arrival: Taxi, pre-arrival and parking procedures should conform to the operator’s procedures
as outlined in the appropriate manual. Inspectors should evaluate crew use of visual parking
aids and/ or aircraft signallers, taxi speed, and accomplishment of shutdown procedures,
ground handling procedures and passenger deplaning procedures.
(l) Post-arrival: Inspectors should observe and evaluate the flight crew complete post flight duties
such as post flight checks, aircraft logbook entries, and flight trip paper work completion and
disposition.
3.4.4 Airports. Inspectors should evaluate the following items concerning the airports which the flight
transits in the course of the inspection:
(a) Condition of surface areas such as apron and gate areas, runways, and taxiways (cracks,
depressions, weeds, overgrowth, etc.).
(f) Obstructions, construction, and surface contaminants (such as ice, slush, snow, fuel spills,
rubber deposits).
(g) FOD.
3.4.5 ATC. During cockpit en route inspections, inspectors have the opportunity to observe and
evaluate ATC operations and airspace procedures from the vantage point of the aircraft
cockpit. Inspectors may observe and evaluate the following areas from the cockpit:
(g) Controller situational awareness - traffic flow, conflicts, aircraft flight characteristics, priorities,
etc.
3.4.6 While not specifically included on the checklist, Inspectors should note any discrepancies
observed with regard to equipment, which is required to be installed on the aircraft by
regulations.
3.4.7 After the flight has been terminated, the inspector should debrief the crew on the discrepancies
observed and on any corrective actions that should be taken. If the inspector observed a
violation of DGCA regulation or company policies during the flight or intends to make critical
comments concerning the crews’ performance, the inspector should inform the flight crew
during the debriefing.
Section 9.6.3 of the ICAO Doc 8335 Manual of Procedures for Operations Certification and
Inspection provides that Station Facilities inspections should be conducted periodically at
every transit base where the operator uses facilities and services in connection with his
operations. Station facility operations may be defined as those support activities required to
originate, turn around, or terminate a flight. A Station Facilities inspection encompasses both
the operations and the facilities required to conduct them. It needs to be appreciated that the
facilities established for scheduled operations would be more elaborate as compared to transit
facilities in the case of non-scheduled or charter operations e.g. Non-scheduled operators are
unlikely to have personnel employed at a station and may be outsourcing the Nevertheless,
facilities essential for the safe conduct of operations need to be ensured for all operators.
4.1.1 Eleven inspection areas may be identified as areas to be observed and evaluated during a
transit station facilities inspection:
(b) Manuals. Refers to the availability, currency, and content of the written guidance required by
employees in the performance of their assigned duties.
(d) Training. Refers to the adequacy of the training given to an assigned personnel as
demonstrated by their knowledge of their duties.
(e) Facility/ Equipment Surface. Refers to the various physical elements required to support flight
operations, such as ramp areas, blast fences, signs, signalling devices, lighting, passenger
and cargo loading equipment, aircraft servicing, and towing equipment.
(f) Conformance. Refers to the compliance of the operator's procedures with civil aviation
regulations and the compliance of the operator's employees with the operator's direction and
guidance.
(g) Flight Control. Refers to the control and support of aircraft flight operations.
(h) Servicing. Refers to the operator's procedures and standards required for the safe servicing
and handling of the operator's aircraft.
(i) Management. Refers to the effectiveness of the operator's management and supervisory
personnel.
(j) Security. Refers to the procedures employed by the operator regarding passenger and cargo
screening and access to restricted areas. Compliance with security instructions issued by
DGCA1Bureau of Civil Aviation Security.
(k) Aerodrome. Refers to airport facilities and equipment which may be observed incidental to
inspecting the operator’s immediate facilities.
The FSD schedules regular inspections of existing operator's transit bases. POIs must ensure
that newly established bases are inspected before the operator commences service to that
destination.
4.3.1 Inspectors, conducting station facilities inspections will encounter a wide range of situations
and operations conditions. Types of stations may vary from a large facility with a permanently
assigned station manager, numerous; employees, and various departments, to a facility
consisting of one employee and a counter. A station facilities inspection may be conducted to
provide for an overall view of the operator's operation or it may be focused on a specific area
of interest. Whenever possible, inspections should be conducted when actual departure or
arrival operations are in progress, in order to obtain an overview of the operation of the station;
and the effectiveness of the equipment, services, procedures, and personnel utilized. The
direction and guidance provided in this section is general in nature, not all of which may be
appropriate in a given situation.
4.3.2 An inspector should carefully plan a station facilities inspection before conducting it. He should
review previous inspection reports and review, any previously identified discrepancies along
with any corrective actions that were taken. Inspectors should coordinate with the station
manager ahead of time to establish a date and time for conducting the inspection. Station
facilities inspections at small or remote locations may be conducted in conjunction with en
route inspections.
4.3.3 Before beginning the inspection, the inspector should request that the station manager provide
a briefing on the facility operation, including assigned personnel and operational procedures.
In turn, the inspector should discuss the purpose and scope of the inspection with the manager
and his staff. This discussion should include the following:
4.3.4 The actual inspection should begin after the briefing, with a tour of the facility. The tour should
provide the inspector with an overview of the operation and the location of individual sections.
The inspector should introduce himself to section supervisors and other employees during the
facility tour in order to become familiar with each section or unit. The tour should include those
areas of the facility that are utilized by the flight and cabin crews for dispatch, briefing, and
flight planning, and those areas that are utilized for passenger loading, cargo loading, weight
and balance preparation, and ramp areas.
4.4.1 Personnel. The inspector should review the staffing of the facility. During this review the
inspector should attempt to determine if the station is adequately staffed and if the assigned
personnel are competent in performing their duties. This may be accomplished by the
inspector observing individuals as they perform their assigned job tasks. For example, the
inspector may review recently completed forms for accuracy and may interview personnel
regarding their job functions. Certificates should be sampled for appropriateness and currency
for those personnel whose job functions require that they hold certificates. Duty time and
length of shifts should be checked for reasonableness. Lengthy duty periods may indicate
inadequate staffing.
4.4.2 Operational Manuals. The inspector should review the operator's manual or system of
manuals for the operation of the facility to determine if the necessary manuals are on hand,
current, readily available to personnel and adequate in content.
4.4.3 Availability. The inspector should determine prior to the inspection what manuals should be
on hand. As with all inspections, a sound prior knowledge of the operator's organization and
procedures is invaluable. During the course of the inspections, the inspector should reach
a conclusion as to whether these manuals are sufficient or if station personnel require any
additional information which was not available.
4.4.4 Currency. The inspector should also ensure that the operator's manuals are current and that
required revisions accurately posted. An inspector should obtain information on the revision
status of manuals from the supervising inspector and/or the operator before beginning the
inspection.
4.4.5 Adequacy each manual or publication should be checked by the inspector to ensure that it
includes that information and guidance necessary to allow personnel to perform their duties
and responsibilities effectively and safely. 'Manuals or instructions which are kept at transit
stations typically provide guidance and procedures for the following operational areas:
(e) Aircraft flight manual (AFM) (for types of aircraft regularly scheduled).
(m) Instructions and procedures for notification of PIC when there are hazardous materials
aboard.
4.4.6 Records. Records which are required to be kept at the transit base or are kept at the discretion
of the operator should be inspected. These may include:
4.4.7 Training. The inspector should review the training conducted for the various classifications of
station personnel. Although Civil Aviation Regulations may not require specific training for
support personnel, such personnel should receive both initial and recurring training in
assigned job functions. This training may be-either-formal classroom training or on-the-job
training. Specific areas of concern are:
(a) Ramp Areas. Ramp areas should be clean and clear of foreign objects. The operator should
have a regular program for inspecting and cleaning ramp surfaces. In northern climates,
adequate facilities must be available for snow removal.
(b) Passenger Movement. Employees and passengers must be protected from jet or prop blast.
Inspectors should evaluate passenger handling procedures and facilities and give particular
attention paid to the movement of passengers across ramps. The operator should hay
established procedures for assisting handicapped passengers, especially when boarding
ramps are not used.
(c) Lighting. To ensure that adequate lighting is available and is being used for safe ground
operations, inspectors should conduct observations during night operations, if feasible.
(d) Hazards and Obstructions. The operators’ management usually assigns to station managers
or supervisors the responsibility for maintaining surveillance of the airport and for reporting
airport hazards and any new obstructions. Inspectors should determine what responsibilities
have been assigned and how those responsibilities are being discharged.
4.4.9 Conformance. In each area inspected, inspectors should evaluate the operators procedures
for compliance with provisions of the applicable CAR' S. In addition, the operators employees
must comply with the operators directives. The conformity section on the checklist is not
intended to be a separate and distinct inspection function but is intended to serve as a
reminder of these elements.
4.4.10 Operational Control. The inspection of a stations operational control function should be
conducted at a time when actual arrival or departure operations are in progress. This allows
the inspector to get an overall view of the effectiveness of the operation and assigned
personnel.
(a) When a dispatch or flight-following centre is located within the station, an operational control
inspection should be conducted in conjunction with the station facilities inspection.
(b) Flight Plans. Operators often exercise operational control from a central location and task the
transit stations with related support functions, such delivering dispatch releases and flight
plans to the flight crew. In this situation, inspectors should determine which functions are the
responsibility of the station. Inspectors should evaluate station personnel in the performance
of these functions, as well as for the effectiveness of the division of responsibility between the
central flight control centre and the line station.
(c) Load and Trim sheet. Inspectors should determine responsibilities for load planning and
weight and balance control. Passenger and cargo weights must be accurate and reliably
obtained, collected, and transmitted. Personnel must be adequately trained. Procedures
should be simple and effective. When computerized systems are used, there should be
adequate back-up provisions for computer failure. If station personnel are assigned to perform
manual calculations in case of computer failure, there should a means of ensuring continued
proficiency of personnel in making these calculations. Inspectors should ask these individuals
to perform a manual calculation and compare the individuals’ solution to the computer solution.
(d) Weather. Inspectors should determine the official source of weather for the station, and
whether or not this source is adequate for the operation and is acceptable to the DGCA.
(e) NOTAM. If the station is responsible for disseminating NOTAMs to flight crews, currency of
NOTAMs and the method for updating should be examined.
4.4.11 Servicing. The servicing area of a station facilities inspection covers routine loading and
servicing as opposed to maintenance activities. While operations inspectors should record
and report observations they believe to be maintenance discrepancies; there not assigned to
inspect-the maintenance area. Inspectors should evaluate areas of concerns to operations
personnel, such as the manner in which logbooks are handled and MEL provisions are
complied with. The inspector should observe the operators service operations to ensure that
safe practices are conducted and that adequate personnel are available for the required
aircraft servicing. The operations that- the inspectors should observe may include, but are not
limited to, the following:
(b) Oil and hydraulic servicing (ensuring that proper procedures are being followed).
(c) Potable water servicing (source of water, cleanliness of storage facilities, and proper
handling).
(d) De-icing (ensuring the correct ration of glycol/water is being used and that all snow and ice is
removed).
(f) Chocks/Mooring (ensuring chocks are in place, the parking ramp is level, and brakes are set
or released).
4.4.12 Management. Managers should be thoroughly aware of their duties and responsibilities and
those of the personnel they supervise. Areas that inspectors should observe and evaluate
include the following:
(a) Communications. Throughout the inspection, inspectors should observe managers and
supervisors, and evaluate the organizational structure, particularly the effectiveness of vertical
and horizontal communications.
(b) Contract Services. If the operator contracts with other companies for station services, the
station manager should have established adequate controls over their performance. The
manager must assure adequate training is provided to contractor personnel.
(c) Contingency Planning. The station management should be prepared for contingencies. Action
plans should be available for use in case of such events as accidents, injury, illness, fuel spill,
bomb threats, hijacking, severe weather, and hazardous material spills. Station personnel
should be knowledgeable as to the location of these plans. Plans should contain emergency
notification checklists and procedures for suspending or cancelling operations. Emergency
telephone listings should be posted in obvious locations and be clearly legible.
4.5 SECURITY
Security procedures should be observed with regard to passenger and cargo screening,
integrity of sterile areas, and access to ramp and other restricted areas. Completed
instructions should be verified to see whether they are up to date.
4.6 AERODROME
Operations inspectors should be alert for obvious deficiencies in aerodrome facilities and
condition, such as firefighting equipment, medical services, and ramp and vehicle control.
other areas, such as marking, lighting, obstructions, navigation facilities, approach aids, etc.
are more properly observed in the course of conducting other types of inspections such as
cockpit en route inspections and ramp inspections.
The Station Facility Inspection Checklist/ Report form is placed at Annexure to Cap 8200.
When completing the report form, discrepancies observed during the inspection should be
documented along with any on-the spot corrective action taken by the inspector. Any
recommended corrective actions should also be noted on the report. Also, the inspector should
indicate an outstanding or above average station facility on the report, to provide an accurate
picture of the operator's operations at the particular facility.
Operators are required to conduct proficiency and competency checks to ensure that all flight
crew are competently performing their duties and responsibilities. CARs Section 8 Series O
Part II and Part IV requires that such checks shall be performed twice within the period of one
year. DGCA FOIs also conduct skill tests of pilots for issuance of licences and ratings.
Paragraph 9.6.28 of the ICOA Doc 8335 Manual of Procedures for Operations Certification
and Inspection states that inspectors must ensure that proficiency checks of the operator's
flight crew personnel are carried out in accordance with the standards and frequency
prescribed in the regulations. FOIs are also required to undertake release and standardisation
checks of DEs/ Examiners/ TRIs/ LTCs and SFIs. Accordingly, FOIs are authorized to observe
these checks at any time as an inspection job function. The objectives of a proficiency or
competency check inspection are as follows:
5.1.1 Evaluate individual Flight crew performing their duties and responsibilities.
5.1.3 Evaluate individual check/ supervisory Flight crew performing their duties and responsibilities.
5.1.4 Evaluate the effectiveness of the operator's standardization, and quality control program.
5.1.5 Identify previously approved or accepted operational procedures, manuals, or checklists which
are deficient.
5.2.1 The inspector should be adequately, prepared to conduct the inspection. In addition to
becoming thoroughly familiar with the operator’s manuals, the inspector should be required to
qualify in the operation of the aircraft, simulators, or training devices. Inspectors should be
familiar with the following areas before conducting proficiency and competency check
inspections:
(a) Crew qualification for simulators, flight training devices, and aircraft.
(b) Acceptable methods for presenting the manoeuvres and events of the check in simulators,
flight training devices, and aircraft.
(f) During the check, the check flight crew should be responsible for:
(i) Ensuring that all required flight test events are completed in a realistic flight scenario.
(iii) Fairly and objectively evaluating the flight crew being checked.
(g) After the check is completed, the inspector should debrief the flight crew who were checked
only if he feels the check flight crew debriefing was inadequate. The inspector is responsible
for debriefing the check flight crew regarding the manner in which he carried out the
responsibilities enumerated in the preceding paragraph. This debriefing should be
accomplished alone with the check flight crew and not in the company of the flight crew who
were checked.
(h) The inspector's primary responsibility is to observe and evaluate the overall conduct of the
check. The inspector should refrain from asking questions of the flight crew being checked,
refrain from attempting to control the type of sequence of checking events, and refrain from
interfering in any way with the manner in which the check flight crew conducts the check. The
inspector will intervene if safety in any way likely to be jeopardized.
(i) It is the check flight crew responsibility to conduct a complete and proper check. The
inspector’s responsibility is to evaluate the performance of both the flight crew being checked
and the check flight crew and to properly record the inspection results. Should the check flight
crew fail to complete all required item on a check, the inspector should bring this fact to the
attention of check flight crew and ensure all events are completed. While certain training
benefits are gained during proficiency or competency checks, the purpose of a check is to
have the flight crew state of proficiency evaluated and to ensure that the last training
conducted has been sufficient to ensure the flight crew proficiency throughout the interim
period. If the check flight crew conducting the check observes minor deficiencies (and believes
that minor instruction may correct the situation) the check flight crew may suspend the check
temporarily, conduct remedial training, and then resume the check. However, check flight crew
should not repeat events several times until they are performed in an acceptable manner.
When a proficiency or competency check is interrupted to conduct training, that check should
still be completed within the time frame the operator originally scheduled for the check. If
training is so extensive that the check cannot be completed in the allotted time, the inspector
should grade the check unsatisfactory revaluation and place the flight crew in additional
training.
5.2.2 Inspectors should record the time required to complete checks and amount of remedial training
conducted while the check was suspended. The DGCA should compare the time these checks
require when conducted by check Flight crew and inspectors. The inspector shall complete
DGCA report/ checklist and handover a copy to the flight crew in order to be submitted to the
operator for perusal.
5.3.1 From the preceding discussion, it can be seen that five specific areas may be observed and
evaluated. These areas have been incorporated in the Aircrew Proficiency and Competency
Check Inspection/Checklist which appears at the end of this chapter and will be used for all
such inspections. The five areas are as follows:
5.3.2 In filling out the form, the inspector should take the following information into consideration:
(a) Flight crew Competency. A flight crew should perform specific events in an aircraft, an aircraft
simulator, a flight training device, or a combination thereof. The events performed during the
check depend on the type of operation conducted and the aircrew's duty position (PIC, Co-
Pilot). This inspection area applies to the knowledge, ability, and proficiency of the flight crew
receiving the proficiency or competency check, as demonstrated by his performance during a
series of required manoeuvres and flight regimes. The inspector takes into account such items
as knowledge of the aircraft, its systems, and components. For pilots: Proper control of
airspeed, configuration, direction, altitude, and attitude in accordance with the procedures and
limitations contained in the manufacturers airplane flight manual, the operator's Aircraft
Operating Manual, Checklists, and other materials applicable to the type of aircraft.
(b) For pilots: Control of aircraft as delineated above over full range of maneouvers and flight
regimes including takeoff, climb, cruise, descent, approach, landing and during emergency
and abnormal siutations.
(c) Crew coordination (cockpit resource management and coordination with ground personnel
and cabin crew)
5.3.3 Content of Check. In this inspection area the inspector evaluates whether all the manoeuvres
required by CAR's were accomplished in the course of the check.
5.3.4 Competency of Check Flight crew as an Evaluator. This inspection area applies to the
inspector evaluating the manner in completeness of the check flight crew observations, and
the validity of the outcome. Such items as check flight crew briefings (before and after the
check), are observed and evaluated by the inspector during the conduct of the check.
5.3.5 Manuals, Procedures and Checklists. This inspection refers to the inspector observing the
manuals, procedures, and checklists used during the conduct of the flight. While conducting
proficiency or competency check inspections, inspectors have an opportunity to observe
deficiencies in previously approved or accepted material that can only be detected while the
material is in use. Such observations may provide the only opportunities inspectors have to
observe the operator's non-normal and emergency procedures in use.
5.3.6 Flight Simulators and Training Equipment. This inspection area refers to the condition of the
aircraft, simulators, or training devices which are used to conduct the check. When evaluating
the equipment, inspectors should determine that required inspections have been conducted,
observed discrepancies are recorded on maintenance logs, and the equipment in an adequate
state of repair.
5.3.7 Further guidance on the conduct of skill tests/ proficiency checks is available in Chapter 10 of
Designated Examiner Manual (CAP 7200).
VOLUME 4
163
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 The Flight Standards Directorate performs the DGCA’s task of certificating and maintaining
regular surveillance of all Air Transport Operators besides many other functions in order to
ensure safe and efficient commercial air transport services in the country. This surveillance
covers not only airlines operating scheduled services but also all other fixed wing aircraft and
helicopter operators. The Directorate is responsible for carrying out release and
standardisation checks of supervisory aircrew as a part of its regular inspection programme.
The personnel of this Directorate are responsible for carrying out Safety Oversight
Responsibilities assigned by the Convention on International Civil Aviation and its Annexes
except for those elements that pertain to determining whether or not there is a need for a
service and for determining the financial viability of an operator or a potential operator.
1.1.2 In order to accomplish these tasks, qualified Flight Operations Inspectors (FOIs) are appointed
to the DGCA against established posts, who conduct Certification/ Surveillance/ Inspection/
Checks and similar other functions as per the policies laid down and as desired by the DGCA.
1.2.1 The Flight Standards Directorate is organized as a component part of DGCA, authorized by
the Government of India and receives responsibilities from the Director General of Civil
Aviation to carry out all required functions.
1.2.2 The activities of Flight Operations Inspectors are governed by the following: -
(a) Chapter 9, Para 9.4.4. of ‘DOC 8335 of the ICAO Manual of Procedures for Operation
Inspection, Certification and Continued Surveillance
(b) Indian Aircraft Act & Rules, AICs, CARs, and applicable Operations Circulars.
(c) FOI Manual (CAP 8200) and any directives given by the Director General
(d) Other relevant circulars and instructions that may be issued from time to time.
1.3.1 Staffing of the Flight Standards Directorate with a sufficient number of suitable Flight
Operations Inspectors, experienced, qualified and capable of accomplishing the wide range
of activities is paramount to the success of the Safety Oversight Programme of the Civil
Aviation Department.
164
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1.3.2 Flight Operations Inspectors (FOIs) must not only have the knowledge, experience and
qualifications to carry out their duties in a professionally sound manner, but also possess the
personality to win the respect and confidence of the operators. This would require a
reasonable level of tact, understanding, firmness, impartiality, integrity and an exemplary
personal conduct both in the air and on the ground. How well they do this, will be the real
measure of their success as Flight Operations Inspectors.
1.3.3 In order to ensure that FOIs contribute effectively towards accomplishment of the Directorate’s
overall objectives, it is incumbent on Chief Flight Operations Inspector (CFOI) to nominate and
encourage their participation in various technical courses, which may enhance their
knowledge in discharge of day-to-day functions. OJT and their inclusion in appropriate
surveillance activities will help the Directorate to benefit from their qualification and
experience.
1.4.1 The level of and the growth of aviation in the country will determine the number of Flight
Operations Inspectors required. A periodic review will take place from time to time as required
to determine whether or not there needs to be a change in the number of Inspectors
authorized. The workforce evaluation methodology is given at Appendix A to this Chapter.
1.5.1 Persons seeking a position as a Flight Operations Inspector should have held previous
appointments either as an airline pilot/ flight engineer or training instructor, or as a Military
Pilot/flight Engineer where experience in air transport operations would have been acquired.
Detailed Recruitment Rules and qualifying experience are defined by the DGCA.
1.5.2 The Flight Operations Inspectors (Aeroplanes) should have the following qualifications:
(a) Should be below 60 years. However in case of qualified and deserving candidates this age
can be relaxed by the selection committee.
(b) Should have a valid or held a ATPL issued by DGCA with PIC rating on Civil Air Transport
aircraft.
(c) Total experience of not less than 5000 hours and not less than 2000 hours as PIC on Air
Transport aircraft.
(d) Accident free record for last 5 years attributable to his proficiency.
(e) It is desirable that the candidate should have held the qualification of an examiner/ instructor/
check pilot approved by Director General of Civil Aviation on civil air transport aircraft or
qualified flight instructor rating in Category A from Defence services.
1.5.3 The Flight Operations Inspectors (Helicopters) should have the following qualifications:
165
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(a) Should be below 60 years. However in case of qualified and deserving candidates this age
can be relaxed by the selection committee.
(b) Should have a Commercial Pilot’s License (Helicopter) issued by DGCA India with Pilot- in-
Command rating.
(c) The total experience of not less than 3000 hours and not less than 1500 hours as Pilot-in
Command on Helicopter.
(d) Accident free record for last 5 years attributable to his proficiency.
(e) It is desirable that the candidate should have held the qualification of an Examiner/ Instructor
approved by Director General of Civil Aviation on civil helicopter or Qualified Flight Instructor
rating in Category A from Defence services.
1.5.4 The Senior Flight Operations Inspectors (A) should have the following qualifications:
(a) Should be below 60 years. However in case of qualified and deserving candidates this age
can be relaxed by the selection committee.
(b) Should have a valid or held a ATPL issued by DGCA with PIC rating on Civil Air Transport
aircraft.
(c) Total experience of not less than 6,000 hours and not less than 4,000 hours as Pilot-in-
Command on air transport aircraft.
(d) Accident free record for last 5 years attributable to his proficiency.
(e) It is desirable:
(i) That the candidate should have held the qualification of an Examiner/ TRI/ LTC approved by
Director General of Civil Aviation on civil air transport aircraft or qualified flight instructor rating
from Defence services.
(ii) Should have an Open rating for all types of aeroplanes having all-up-weight not exceeding
5,700 kgs.
1.5.5 The Senior Flight Operations Inspectors (H) should have the following qualifications:
(a) Should be below 60 years. However in case of qualified and deserving candidates this age
can be relaxed by the selection committee.
(b) Should have or held a Commercial Pilot’s License (Helicopter) or issued by DGCA India with
Pilot- m-Command rating.
(c) The total experience of not less than 3500 hours and not less than 1750 hours as Pilot-in
Command on Helicopter.
166
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(d) Accident free record for last 5 years attributable to his proficiency.
(e) It is desirable:
(i) that the candidate should have held the qualification of an Examiner/ Instructor approved by
Director General of Civil Aviation on civil helicopter or Qualified Flight Instructor rating from
Defence services.
(ii) Should have an Open rating for all types of Helicopters having all-up-weight not exceeding
1500 kgs.
1.5.6 The Deputy Chief Flight Operations Inspectors (A) should have the following qualifications:
(a) Should be below 60 years. However in case of qualified and deserving candidates this age
can be relaxed by the selection committee.
(b) Should have a valid or held a ATPL issued by DGCA with PIC rating on Civil Air Transport
aircraft.
(c) Total experience of not less than 6,500 hours and not less than 5,000 hours as Pilot-in-
Command on air transport aircraft.
(d) Should have held the qualification of an Examiner approved by Director General of Civil
Aviation on civil air transport aircraft or Qualified Flight Instructor in Category A rating from
Defence services.
(e) Accident free record for last 5 years attributable to his proficiency.
(f) It is desirable that the candidate should have an Open rating for all types of aeroplanes having
all-up-weight not exceeding 5,700 kgs.
1.5.7 The Deputy Chief Flight Operations Inspectors (H) should have the following qualifications:
(a) Should be below 60 years. However in case of qualified and deserving candidates this age
can be relaxed by the selection committee.
(b) Should have a valid or held a CPL(H) issued by DGCA with PIC rating on Civil Air Transport
aircraft.
(c) Total experience of not less than 4,000 hours and not less than 2,500 hours as Pilot-in-
Command on helicopters.
(d) Should have held the qualification of an Examiner approved by Director General of Civil
Aviation on helicopters or Qualified Flight Instructor in Category A rating from Defence
services.
(e) Accident free record for last 5 years attributable to his proficiency.
167
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(f) It is desirable that the candidate should have an Open rating for all types of helicopters having
all-up-weight not exceeding 1,500 kgs.
1.5.8 The Chief Flight Operations Inspectors should have the following qualifications:
(a) Should be below 60 years. However in case of qualified and deserving candidates this age
can be relaxed by the selection committee.
(b) Should have a valid or held a ATPL issued by DGCA with PIC rating on Civil Air Transport
aircraft.
(c) Should have an Open rating for all types of aeroplanes having all-up-weight not exceeding
5,700 kgs.
(d) Total experience of not less than 7000 hours and not less than 5,000 hours as Pilot-in-
Command on air transport aircraft.
(e) Should have held the qualification of an Examiner approved by Director General of Civil
Aviation on civil air transport aircraft or Qualified Flight Instructor in Category A rating from
Defence services.
(f) Accident free record for last 5 years attributable to his proficiency.
1.5.9 The above requirements are dynamic and may be varied based on the extant needs and
requirements of DGCA.
168
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
APPENDIX A
The Workforce Evaluation Methodology allows the DGCA to determine whether it has
an adequate number of inspectors, or needs to hire additional personnel. The methodology is
conducted separately for each type of inspector group (e.g., operations, cabin safety and
airworthiness). The Inspector Workforce Evaluation Methodology should be re-visited
periodically to account for aviation system growth or when a brand new aircraft type is
introduced into the system.
1. First, it is necessary to calculate Total DGCA Inspector Hours Required. This requires
collection of three types of information:
a. The identification of each work function broken down into categories of activities
i. Surveillance activities
c. The total number of inspector hours required to complete each work function
2. Enter the information into an Excel spreadsheet (see Figure 1 for a sample Workforce
Evaluation Worksheet). The total number of annual hours required for each work function can
be calculated by multiplying the times per year each work function is performed by the number
of inspector hours required to complete each work function.
3. Calculate the total DGCA Inspector Hours Required by each inspector group separately
(Operations, Airworthiness, and Cabin Safety), then find the sum of the total number of hours
required for each work function performed by that inspector group.
169
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1. There are two important components to calculating Total Inspector Hours Available:
a. The number of hours that each inspector is available to conduct work functions
a. The number of hours each day each inspector is expected to work (typically 8 hours per
day)
b. The number of work days annually the inspector will be in training, on vacation or
unavailable to work for other reasons. For example, if it is assumed that an inspector works 5
days per week; there are 15 days of Government holidays; devotes 20 days for training
activities and avails 50 days of leave/ vacation, the inspector’s available work days will be 200
work days.
c. This will give the number of hours annually an inspector will work (typically between 1500
and 1600 hours)
3. This analysis is conducted separately for each inspector group. Therefore, the total
number of inspectors refers to the total number of current, qualified and available inspectors
in the group currently being analyzed.
4. Once these two numbers are determined, Total Inspector Hours Available can be
calculated by finding the sum of the number of hours each inspector is available to perform
work function and the total number of inspectors. Thus, if each inspector has 1600 hours
available, and there are 6 inspectors, then the Total Inspector Hours Available are 9600 hours.
Compare the Total Inspector Hours Required calculated in Step 1 to the Total Inspector Hours
Available calculated in Step 2. If the Total Inspector Hours Required is less than the Total
Inspector Hours Available, then the DGCA likely has sufficient staffing. However, if the Total
Inspector Hours Required is more than the Total Inspector Hours Available, the DGCA may
want to consider adding additional staff.
This step involves taking the number of inspectors required and determining the necessary
training and qualification requirements for the inspectors to meet the demands of the civil
aviation system. These training requirements include the necessary inspector training (initial,
recurrent and on-the-job training) as well as the necessary aircraft type-rating qualification
needed for effective oversight of air operators.
170
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
171
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
2.1 GENERAL
2.1.1 International aviation standards require that a civil aviation authority provide its safety
inspectors with comprehensive training to ensure the competency of its inspector workforce.
2.1.2 The DGCA’s Training Program has four components:
2.1.3 The multiple facets of the Training Program reflect the fact that the program is intended to
support not only training for new inspectors, but professional development of inspectors
throughout their careers. This Chapter provides the general guidelines and procedures for the
DGCA’s Training Program, which are further tailored in subsequent chapters in accordance
with the duties and responsibilities of the respective inspectors.
2.2.1 The Director General acknowledges that all inspectors must be appropriately qualified and
trained to perform all duties and tasks required. The Director General will ensure that all such
personnel are provided the initial training necessary to carry out their duties, as set forth in
this Chapter.
2.2.2 The Director General also acknowledges that recurrent training is required for inspectors to
be able to keep abreast of industry and DCCA developments and thereby continue to be able
to provide appropriate safety oversight. The Director General will ensure such recurrent
training is provided, as set forth in this Chapter.
2.3.1 The Director General will ensure appropriate training by directing that the Training Directorate
establish and maintain Individual Training Plans that sets out the training to be provided to
each of their inspectors for at least a 12-month period. Each inspector’s plan will be updated
by managers as necessary to adjust the timing of the planned courses and activities, or to
amend the list of planned courses and activities to meet a newly identified need.
2.4.1 Flight Standards Directorate provides an in-house Initial Training course for
172
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
each newly hired inspector. The purpose of this course is to familiarize him/ her with the DGCA
and the functioning of the various Directorates, especially FSD.
2.4.2 Newly recruited inspectors are required to complete the Initial Training course within the
stipulated time frame in order to start OJT in their respective areas of posting. This will enable
them to be more useful in providing assistance to senior inspectors at the preparatory level of
work.
2.5.1 OJT provides direct experience in the work environment in which the inspector is performing
or will be performing on the job. The DGCA’s structured OJT policy and procedure is set forth
in greater detail in Appendix 2.5A.
2.5.2 OJT entails the completion of three levels of training for each technical job function. The three
levels encompass the study of reference materials, task observation, and task performance,
as further defined below. An OJT trainer must validate all Levels (I, II, and III) of performance.
2.5.3 Level I Training (Knowledge): Level I training is related to that body of knowledge associated
with a specific job task. This knowledge is contained in orders, rules, guidance, and standards.
Level I training typically involve a review of all reference materials applicable to the job tasks
for which training has been identified. Level I training may be satisfied through classroom
training or other delivery methods.
2.5.4 Level II Training (Task Observation): Level II training involves observation of the performance
of specific job tasks. This training typically involves the trainee observing and/or assisting the
OJT trainer in the performance of those specific job tasks for which the trainee will be held
accountable. Level II training may be satisfied through appropriate training that provides the
opportunity for the trainee to observe and/or assist the trainer performing the task.
2.5.5 Level III Training (Task Performance): Level III training involves the application of knowledge
and skills to the performance of specific job tasks. Typically, the trainee performs the job task
under the observation of a qualified OJT trainer. The trainer assesses the performance of the
task and indicates on the trainee’s OJT training plan when Level III performance is achieved.
2.5.6 The OJT process begins with the DGCA formulating an OJT plan for the newly hired inspector.
The OJT plan is based on specific job tasks that are part of his or her particular work
assignments; allows for credit for classroom training (such as indoctrination) or prior
experience that equate to Level I or Level II OJT for one or more tasks; and includes, as
applicable, specialized tasks that newly hired inspectors may need to be able to perform.
2.6.1 Each respective Directorate provides an in-house Recurrent Training course for inspectors
that are already having working knowledge and experience. The purpose of the Recurrent
Training course is to improve the inspector’s decision-making capability, develop maturity to
share more responsibilities in elevated position, and provide knowledge with international
standards.
173
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
2.6.2 The Recurrent Training course may share content with the Initial Training course, but varies
in emphasis from one to other, as the Initial Training course provides a fuller treatment across
all subject area. The Recurrent Training course focuses on changes from year to year in
regulations, guidance material as well as significant events occurring in the industry and the
local environment from time to time.
2.7.1 The purpose of specialized (or continuation) training is to upgrade the knowledge and
competency of existing inspectors on par with international standards and for efficient
functioning.
2.7.2 Specialized and technical training programs are developed by DGCA as applicable to a
particular inspector’s duties. The DGCA works in association with international organizations
under special training programs/ schemes like US-India Cooperation project, India-US ACP
program, COSCAP, etc. Duration of training is based on the course and the hosting
organization.
2.8.1 Formal training courses may be obtained from external training centres, or through relevant
manufacturer training programs, subject to the approval of the DGCA based on the procedure
set forth herein.
2.8.2 The DGCA evaluates the quality of such training pursuant to the following procedures
(a) Pre-Course Request: The DGCA requests that the external training centre submit the training
course syllabus for review.
(b) Pre-Course Review and Approval: The DGCA evaluates the general completeness, content
and overall quality of training course information, and confirms whether the training adheres
to the requirement of the CARs and DGCA standards. Following review, the DGCA either
determines that the training course is acceptable or not.
(ii) A course evaluation form that rates the quality of the training curricula, courseware, facilities,
instructor, and any other appropriate type of supporting information
Note: Annexure II provides the Training Evaluation Form used by DGCA inspectors to review
a course.
174
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
2.8.3 Authorization of External Aircraft Type Training Examiners for New Aircraft Types: When an
aircraft operator applies for a new aircraft to be added to its Air Operator Permit (AOP), the
DGCA determines resources available for initial qualification. In the event of a new aircraft
type, the DGCA may not have inspectors that are qualified in that aircraft type. In such
instances, the DGCA implements the following procedure:
(a) The DGCA coordinates with another State or external training centre that has appropriately
licensed personnel and qualified Inspector/examiner, respectively, who can administer
practical test to DGCA inspectors.
(b) The DGCA selects the qualified Inspector/ examiner that meets the criteria set forth below for
DGCA trainers and ensures that this designee is familiar with and competent in CAR
requirements and DGCA standards for administering practical tests.
(c) The DGCA issues a one-time written authorization to the external qualified inspector/ designee
examiner to conduct a practical test for the DGCA inspector in accordance with the CAR
requirements and DGCA standards.
(d) The qualified inspector/ designee examiner must be identified by name and possess the
requisite qualifications.
(e) The initial inspector and the AOP pilot applicants (the initial cadre) train together at the same
time at the external training centre.
(f) The practical test is administered by the qualified inspector/designee examiner to the DGCA
inspector first.
(g) The DGCA inspector, now qualified, then administers practical test to AOP pilot applicants for
type rating in accordance with CAR requirements and DGCA standards.
2.8.4 The DGCA inspector is qualified to approve elements for air operator certification and AOC/
AOP pilot applicants are qualified to develop manuals/ training program for review and
approval by the DGCA.
2.9.1 Train the Trainer approach simply involves "initially training a person or people who, in turn,
train other people". In other words, one subject-matter expert shares his or her expertise with
a group of trainers from the organization. This group then uses this information to instruct
others. Training of Trainers (ToT) is a high-level professional learning process for qualified
personnel who will be providing training and capacity-building to other trainers within FSD,
DGCA.
175
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
2.9.2 Often specific qualifications/ expertise in the desired field are not available with any of the staff
members. Such a situation may occur especially when new technology, procedures or
techniques are being introduced into the already highly technical field of aviation. In such a
situation, there is a need for a core team of competent staff to adequately familiarize
themselves with the new equipment or processes in order to not only lay down or implement
standards but also train other trainers who will then disseminate the new knowledge to rest of
the staff.
2.9.3 However, as this approach forms the basis for the overall organizational expertise in any field,
it requires special care to be exercised for effective practice. The most critical element of this
entire approach is the selection of people with the correct approach and flair for imparting
training. Accordingly, FSD, DGCA shall preferably nominate FOIs with prior experience as
trainers for undergoing ‘Train the Trainer’ training.
2.9.4 The nominated FOIs shall undergo ‘Train the Trainer’.
2.9.5 The nominated FOIs shall also acquire specific technical knowledge on new technology or
procedures from OEMs/ other regulators/ industry accredited bodies. The duration of this
training would depend on the technology/ procedure to the satisfaction of the DGCA.
2.10.1 The training provided to DGCA inspectors are delivered by individuals specifically designated
by the DGCA as trainers. Selection of trainers is based on criteria explained at Appendix to
this Chapter.
2.10.2 The DGCA will provide qualified trainers with a written designation stating that the individual
is DGCA trainer and authorized to deliver the training – e.g., in-house training courses, OJT
training and external aircraft type training.
2.11.1 In the event an Air Operators Certificate applicant proposes to begin operations with an aircraft
type for which the DGCA has no qualified Flight Operations Inspector (FOI) and Airworthiness
Inspector (AWI), the DGCA must make the appropriate inspector(s) available for training on
the new aircraft type.
2.11.2 Generally, the inspectors will receive the necessary training by participating in the initial
training provided to the operator’s personnel. The DGCA inspectors will undergo requisite
checks with qualified Examiners of the OEM. DGCA inspectors will then carry out checks of
the operator’s flight crew/ technicians as required.
2.11.3 Industry Examiners on Short Term Contract: In case of non-availability of a Type Rated
FOI, the DGCA may hire an industry examiner on short term contract to carry out tasks as
assigned by DGCA. These examiners shall conduct Skill tests, Pilot proficiency Checks
including IR check on the type of aircraft endorsed on the licence.
These Examiners may also be used to evaluate Operations Manuals. (Parts B and D), Aircraft
Checklists, Minimum Equipment List (MEL) and Special Ops procedures.
176
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
The examiners shall undergo 2 days Indoctrination course on the above topics followed by an
assessment. The examiners shall undergo a one day refresher course annually.
2.11.4 Other FOIs and AWIs associated with certification/ surveillance will also be provided with basic
information regarding the type of aircraft equipment, navigational systems, and/ or proposed
techniques associated with the new aircraft type.
2.12.1 DGCA will periodically review the Training Program and carry out revisions so that the training
of inspectors is continuously updated to keep abreast of the latest developments taking place
in the aviation field.
2.12.2 Analysis of feedback received after each training should be considered for revision of policies,
syllabus, and curriculum. The DGCA utilizes a Training Evaluation Form, set forth in Annexure
II, for this purpose.
2.13.1 All training completed by an inspector will be documented in his or her inspector training file
Inspectors who complete a formal external or in-house training course will receive a Certificate
of Completion to be added to their inspector training file.
2.13.2 When OJT is delivered to an inspector, the individual OJT activity will be notated on the
inspector’s OJT plan.
177
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1. PART I – INTRODUCTION
1.1. “OJT is planned training conducted at a work site by an authorized Trainer. This type
of training provides direct experience in the work environment in which the inspector is
performing or will be performing on the job.”
1.2. The OJT Program is an essential part of inspector’s training and adds value to the
overall training effort. By applying knowledge and skills learned, the trainee inspector
completes the learning process. At the same time, the Directorate gains confidence in the
trainee’s capabilities. With the completion of OJT, the Directorate can certify the trainee as a
qualified inspector.
1.3. The inspector’s OJT Program is a process for implementation and management of a
structured OJT system using DGCA guidelines. The program can be tailored to the tasks in
which inspector needs training and may also include training on tasks unique to an office. The
training can be provided immediately when the need or opportunity arises.
1.4. OJT empowers an inspector to develop needed skills. When a training need exists,
OJT can be provided. OJT has been identified as the best method for delivering the needed
training, or if no other means to receive the training is available.
1.5. Throughout the career, OJT remains a valuable tool for continually broadening
technical skills and capabilities of an inspector. Cross training in tasks to be coordinated with
other directorates may not be possible through other training means due to resource
limitations but may be more easily attainable through a structured OJT Program.
1.6. Definitions
(a) Certification. Certification work activities validate the competency of an air operator,
maintenance organization, or certifying personnel and their compliance with appropriate
statutory and regulatory requirements prior to active performance in the aviation Industry.
(b) Level I OJT Training. Level I training is related to that body of knowledge associated with a
specific job task. This knowledge is contained in orders, rules, guidance, and standards. Level
I training typically involve a review of all reference materials applicable to the job tasks for
which training has been identified. Level I training may be satisfied through classroom training
or other delivery methods.
(c) Level II OJT Training. Level II training involves observation of the performance of specific job
tasks. This training typically involves the trainee observing and/ or assisting the OJT trainer in
the performance of those specific job tasks for which the trainee will be held accountable.
Level II training may be satisfied through appropriate training that provides the opportunity for
the trainee to observe and/ or assist the trainer performing the task.
(d) Level III OJT Training. Level III training involves the application of knowledge and skills to the
performance of specific job tasks. Typically, the trainee performs the job task under the
178
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
observation of a qualified OJT trainer. The trainer assesses the performance of the task and
indicates on the trainee’s OJT training plan when Level III performance is achieved.
(e) Principal OJT Program Coordinator. The Principal OJT Program Coordinator is the in-charge
of implementing the OJT Program in DGCA as a whole. He is responsible for approving the
OJT Program prepared by OJT Program Coordinator of each Directorate of DGCA and
reviewing the implementation and improvements in OJT Program based on feedback.
(f) OJT Program Coordinator. The Inspector who is designated to establish and maintain the
OJT Program for the respective Directorate. This is a key role in establishing the OJT Program.
(g) Training Coordinator. The inspector who is designated to establish and implement the OJT
program in each respective Directorate. This is a key role in the implementation of the OJT
Program.
(h) OJT Trainer. A trained inspector designated to provide OJT instruction to trainees on specific
tasks at Levels I, II, and III, in accordance with the procedures established in this document.
OJT trainers Should be designated in each respective office.
(i) OJT Record. A tool that is used to record the trainee’s OJT plan, progress, and completion.
(j) OJT Steering Committee. A group of inspectors from the headquarters who have oversight of
the OJT Program.
(k) OJT Task. A unit of work that contains logical and necessary steps in the performance of a
job duty, typically with a defined beginning and ending. The task must produce a meaningful
result and is one that can best being taught and learned on the job.
(l) Surveillance. One of the most significant duties of the DGCA is to conduct surveillance in all
areas of air transportation. The primary objective of surveillance activities is to provide the
DGCA with accurate, real-time, comprehensive information for the evaluation of the safety
status of the air transportation system.
(a) A Job Task is, “A single identifiable unit of work that is regularly accomplished by an inspector
in the course of a normal work year.”
(b) Each Job Task is supported by a detailed Job Task Analysis. This analysis is a written
summary that describes how to perform the Job Task. More specifically a Job Task Analysis
is, “A written description of the materials, procedures, and requirements that are used to
accomplish a Job Task, including, supporting documentation, completion standards, narrative
description of the task, and step by step listing of the required sub tasks.”
(c) Trainee Inspectors must complete OJT for each Job Task that they will be asked to perform
without assistance. OJT Program Co coordinator is responsible for determining which tasks
are required for each inspector based on the trainee inspector’s work assignment. OJT must
be completed for each of the required Job Tasks.
179
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1.8. The OJT Steering Committee. An OJT Steering Committee may be established by
DGCA with CFOI as the Principal OJT Program Coordinator to supervise the management of
the OJT program. When so designated, the OJT Steering Committee should be composed of
OJT Program Coordinators of each Directorate of DGCA and chaired by the Principal OJT
Program Coordinator. The committee provides oversight and guidance for the implementation
of the OJT Program of each Directorate. The Committee shall monitor and assess
accomplishment of program objectives and shall recommend changes to the program. The
committee should meet at least annually to discuss training issues.
1.9. OJT Program Coordinator. An OJT Program Coordinator shall be of the rank of Dy
CFOI/ Deputy Director General/ Director of each Directorate. The OJT Program Coordinator
is responsible for the implementation of the OJT program in the respective Directorate.
1.10. The OJT Program Coordinator is responsible for the items discussed below.
(a) Ensuring that this OJT Program is implemented efficiently and effectively.
(b) Ensuring the designation of OJT Trainers who meet the selection criteria outlined below.
(c) Planning and budgeting to ensure that the OJT Program continuously receives the resources
necessary for the effective accomplishment of its goals.
(d) Specifying the particular Job Tasks that apply to trainee inspectors in the office.
(e) Establishing a standardized method to ensure that trainees are provided adequate time and
resources required for completing OJT training on specific tasks.
(f) Obtaining assistance from an OJT Trainer located at another office when a training
requirement cannot be fulfilled locally due to the lack of internal instructional expertise.
(g) Ensuring that trainees begin their OJT Program as soon as possible.
(i) Reviewing with each OJT Trainer, on a regular basis, the progress of assigned trainee
inspectors and initiating any corrective action necessary to improve performance and/or
training deficiencies.
(j) Final sign off in the Training Record of an inspector to certify completion of all OJT
requirements for each Job Task. This sign off is DGCA authorization for the inspector to begin
accomplishing that Job Task without further assistance.
(k) Evaluating OJT Trainer performance annually with a mid-year review based on
180
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(l) Assuming the role of mediator and decision maker when there are OJT problems and/or
disagreements involving OJT Trainers and trainee inspectors.
(m) Acting upon feedback from trainees concerning the OJT Program.
(o) Verifying that, prior to conducting OJT, selected OJT Trainers have successfully completed
required training courses.
(p) Monitoring OJT Trainer performance and guiding OJT Trainers on effective methods and
techniques.
(c) Ensuring that OJT instruction is consistent with applicable DGCA regulations and practices,
(e) Entering data in a trainee’s training record after instruction when necessary to certify
completion of individual Job Tasks,
(f) Exhibiting objective, constructive, empathetic, and other behaviors conducive to supporting all
OJT trainees,
(g) Conducting OJT according to the trainee’s individual training plan as developed by the OJT
Program Coordinator/Training Coordinator.
(h) Assessing the trainee level of knowledge and skill on specific tasks,
(i) Providing structured, well planned, and documented OJT training with stated objectives and
expected levels of performance,
(j) Communicating with the OJT Program Coordinator about trainee progress, and
(k) Ensuring that the trainee has accomplished all elements of OJT instruction associated with a
particular task in an acceptable manner before notifying the OJT Program Coordinator that
the trainee is able to perform the task without assistance and is ready for final sign off.
1.12. Trainee
(b) Participating in the feedback process to help ensure continual improvement including
feedback on the performance of the Trainer, and
181
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(c) Participating, in a constructive manner, in their own training progress reviews and checking
the accuracy of completed tasks during the review meetings.
1.13. This part of the OJT policy discusses the implementation of the OJT system process.
This process consists of three phases:
1.14.1 The first step would involve designation of the OJT Program Coordinator and the
Training Coordinator.
(a) The OJT Program coordinator and the Training Coordinator should estimate trainer
Requirements while planning the OJT program. At a minimum, there should be one trainer for
each represented occupational specialty in the office. As a maximum, not more than 25% of
all inspectors in the office should be OJT trainer. When selecting OJT trainer following should
be considered:
(i) How many inspectors, including new recruits, are expected to need OJT for the planning
period?
(ii) What knowledge and skills will the OJT trainer require? What specialties are represented in
the needed training? This should come from the profiles developed earlier.
182
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(i) Qualification in the job specialty and job tasks they are intended to teach advanced knowledge,
skill, and experience that match the identified training needs along with the necessary skills to
support and enhance training and create a learning environment
(iii) Willingness to prepare training, instruct and coach trainees on performance of tasks being
trained
(iv) Ability to communicate technical information, concepts, and procedures clearly, concisely, and
positively in a variety of ways
(c) It is important for all the trainers to attend a course of training on instructional techniques to
ensure consistency in delivering OJT and in evaluating trainee progress. The Training
Coordinator will work with the trainer to reinforce training concepts and the value of a
structured, planned training activity for each trainee.
(d) Once individuals are appropriately trained to be OJT trainer, the Training Coordinator will
prepare and sign a letter stating that the individual meets the criteria to be a trainer, that he
has completed the formal training course on instructional techniques, and is authorized as an
OJT trainer. The letter will list the specific roles and responsibilities assigned to the OJT trainer
if different from those roles and responsibilities listed for OJT trainer in this policy.
(e) Only those OJT trainers who are so authorised are considered to be OJT trainers under the
respective OJT Program.
(a) Development of the trainee’s Individual OJT Plan. The Training Coordinator shall review
training program expectations and responsibilities to be sure that the trainee understands the
process. The following points should be discussed:
(ii) Review of the roles of the trainee, OJT trainer, Training Coordinator, and the OJT Program
Coordinator
(iv) Informing the trainee that OJT is a means of receiving individualized training but does not
substitute for required formal classroom training.
1.14.5 The Training Coordinator shall consider the proposed work assignment for the trainee.
He may decide that the trainee should become proficient in all the job functions performed in
the office.
183
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(a) The Training coordinator and OJT trainers will jointly develop a proposed schedule for
providing training according to the trainee’s individual OJT training plan developed. The
Training Coordinator shall ensure that sufficient time is allotted to allow the OJT to take place.
When practical, the trainee’s work program should be adjusted to accommodate the trainer’s
schedule. When allocating work time to accomplish OJT, consideration should be given to the
specific level of the OJT training to be accomplished (Level I, II, or III) and the complexity of
the task. The following should be considered for the different levels of training:
(b) Level I training is typically a self-study effort on the part of the trainee with guided discussion
and validation conducted by the OJT trainer afterwards. The time allowed for this should be
appropriate to the complexity of the task and the amount of material to be studied.
(c) Levels II and III involve the actual performance of the task. A good general guideline is to take
the normal amount of time to conduct the task and add an additional 50% of that time to allow
for instruction and questions. For example, a task that normally takes 1.0 hour should be
allowed 1.5 hours for OJT.
(d) As the process of scheduling OJT is continuous in nature, the schedule for delivering OJT
should be updated as opportunities for OJT arise.
When preparing for the delivery of OJT, trainer should review the Job Task Analysis,
Associated technical guidance materials, and OJT Training Guidance
(a) To review the Job Task Analysis for the task to be presented.
(b) To gather all needed equipment, hardware, and software (as applicable).
(c) To determine if any assistance from other sources is needed regarding the task and how it
should be performed. If personnel other than an authorized OJT trainer are used as
informational resources, the training should be observed by an authorized OJT trainer to
ensure compliance with the training plan and other objectives contained in this policy.
(d) To create a specific lesson plan for the training event when necessary to properly organize
the training.
(e) To finalize logistical arrangements for training in the office or off site as appropriate to the
training event.
To review all technical guidance material to ensure that the training will be conducted in
accordance with current approved procedures. These guidance materials may include such
184
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
things as orders, Aircraft Engineering Procedure Manual, regulations, ICAO publications and
other documents that are relevant to the task.
The OJT training process follows a logical progression of three levels as shown in the table
below:
(a) Level I training is typically a self-study effort on the part of the trainee with guided discussion
and validation conducted by the OJT trainer afterwards. Levels II and III involve the actual
performance of the task.
(b) Each task assigned to a trainee requires certification at all three levels. Both formal training
and OJT are integral parts of a well-developed training program and should be scheduled to
complement each other.
(a) The content of each training session must be appropriate to the task and to the level of training
that is being presented. A typical OJT training event will include some or all of the following
activities:
(v) Assessment of the trainee’s existing knowledge and skill in performing the task
185
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(a) Permanent training records must be maintained for each inspector. This shall be accomplished
using a hard copy paper system, and also through computerized record keeping system.
(b) The training coordinator is responsible to maintain and update Training records. This
responsibility may be delegated to the OJT trainers when necessary. Entries should be
updated as training is delivered. The OJT program coordinator, training coordinator, and OJT
trainers have write access to the training records. Trainees have read only access to their own
records.
(c) When a training event is successfully completed the OJT trainer should notify the Training
Coordinator. This can be done via e mail or another locally implemented procedure that will
provide a record that a trainee has completed training on a task. The notification should
include:
(d) On receipt of report from OJT trainer about completion of a OJT task, the Training Coordinator
shall issue a certificate to the trainee intimating such completion and authorizing him to carry
out the tasks without any further assistance. With the Training Coordinator approval the OJT
trainer will then update the trainee’s records with the new information.
(a) A simple review of the trainee’s OJT performance should be conducted at the end of each
OJT training session. More in depth reviews of the trainee’s progress in the OJT training
program should be conducted quarterly, or as needed. The frequency of these reviews will
depend on various factors such as the amount of OJT assigned, problems encountered, and
the changing needs of the office. This meeting should be attended by the Training Coordinator,
OJT trainer and the trainee.
(b) The Training Coordinator shall schedule a meeting with the trainee and the OJT trainer. The
following areas should be discussed:
186
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(c) If problems are encountered between the trainee and his trainer the Training Coordinator
should meet with the trainer to discuss the issues and provide coaching as needed.
The program shall be evaluated by the Training Coordinator with the input of OJT trainers,
trainees. This evaluation shall be done at least twice a year. The Training Coordinator will
evaluate the OJT program through meetings and observation. The review is one way of
determining if the OJT program is working properly. The feedback should be analyzed and
suggested changes discussed with the OJT Program Coordinator. These evaluations should
be conducted even if there are no new recruits in the office. On site visits may be conducted
on an as needed basis.
The Training Coordinator is responsible for communicating program suggestions and changes
for his Directorate. This can include any recommendations arising from the evaluation. A
meeting shall be scheduled to discuss the OJT program. The meeting should be attended by
the OJT Program Coordinator, Training Coordinator and OJT Trainers to discuss the status of
the program, problems encountered, and suggestions for improvement. The results of these
meetings shall be implemented to improve the OJT Program in the Directorate.
The OJT Program Coordinator is critical in implementing changes as needed to ensure the
inspectors develop the skills and capabilities. The OJT Program Coordinator shall develop an
implementation plan for needed improvements, answering the following types of questions:
187
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
188
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
SIGNATURE
NAME OF TRAINER
I hereby confirm that I have completed the OJT documented above with the qualified OJT
Trainer(s).
Note : - Trainer(s) to mark ‘S’ for SATISFACTORY or ‘U/S’ for UNSATISFACTORY at the appropriate cell.
189
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
190
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
COMMENTS
191
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
3.1.1 The newly recruited Flight Operations Inspector’s must successfully complete the Flight
Operations Inspectors’ Orientation Course (FOIOC). The course will be conducted by
authorised DGCA trainers. The syllabus for FOI Orientation Course is specified at Appendix
3.1A to this chapter.
3.1.2 In case of FOIs re-joining DGCA after a break exceeding one year but less than three years,
they shall be required to undergo an Extended Refresher course as per the syllabus placed at
Appendix B to this chapter.
3.1.3 In case of FOIs re-joining DGCA after a break less than one year, they shall be required to
fulfil the FOI Recurrent training requirements as per the details given in Appendix C to this
chapter for resuming FOI functions.
3.2.1 FOIs are required to carry out certification/ surveillance and inspection tasks. Some of these
tasks are specific to the type of aircraft and normally must be undertaken by FOIs who are
qualified and rated on type.
3.2.2 However, in certain cases DGCA may not have adequate number of type qualified FOIs and
may need FOIs to obtain additional type qualification. This would also be the case if an
operator decided to induct a new type of aircraft into the country. On the other hand, especially
in the case of FOIs with a military background, newly inducted FOIs may not hold type ratings
on the types currently in active civil flying and would therefore need to be provided type
training.
3.2.3 The CFOI, in consultation with Deputy CFOIs and Director Operations, shall decide the
type(s) of aircraft for a newly inducted FOI for undertaking FOI technical duties.
3.2.4 The aircraft type(s) allocated to an FOI may be subsequently modified based on the growth/
changes in the aviation industry or other organisational requirements.
3.2.5 Routine FOI activities can be accomplished on any aircraft in operational service whether or
not the FOI is type rated on that particular type. In cases where the FOI is conducting a
surveillance function on an aircraft in which he is not type rated, he must limit his observations
and remarks to those elements that are not specific to that type of aircraft unless the
occurrence is self-evident and would not take a type rated person to make an observation of
that nature. An example of that would be not levelling at the altitude to which cleared or not
complying with an ATC clearance.
192
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
3.3.1 FOIs will normally be required to carry out certification/ surveillance/ inspection tasks related
to the type of aircraft they are qualified and rated on. Accordingly, they are required to maintain
adequate piloting skills on the type of aircraft allocated to them. However, it also needs to be
borne in mind by newly inducted FOIs that they are not required to undertake routine
commercial or line flying and therefore the quantum of flying would be lesser and FOIs need
to make the best use of flying opportunities provided to them.
3.3.2 A DGCA’s Flight Operations Inspector must conduct proficiency checks for a DGCA’s
Flight Operations Inspector. When this is not possible or practical because of time/
distances and/or expenses, by prior arrangement, a check carried out by a Flight
Operations Inspector of the country in which the check is to be carried out to the level
required by that authority for their own Inspectors, or to the level required by the rules of
India would be acceptable.
3.3.3 Flight Operations Inspector who carry out skill checks/ tests on aircraft should maintain
currency, qualification and proficiency in flying by carrying out three take-offs and landings
every ninety days in a simulator or in an aircraft on a non-commercial/ non-revenue flight.
3.3.4 Flight Operations Inspector who are not required to carry out skill checks/ tests on aircraft
should maintain currency in accordance with Appendix C.
3.3.5 FOIs who are medically unfit are required to undergo type-specific Ground Technical
Refresher to enable them to carry out type related work. However, such FOI’s may be deputed
for carrying out Simulator based DE/TRI standardization checks are required to carry out
limited recurrent training followed by a standardization check with another FOI.
3.4.1 FOIs would be required to complete all three levels of OJT in each of the assigned FOI duties
before undertaking the duties independently e.g. for undertaking any of the certification duties
such as approval of OM as per CAP 8100 or evacuation exercises etc.
3.4.2 OJT requirements may be dispensed/ reduced at the discretion of the CFOI, in consultation
with the JDG, in case of non-availability of qualified FOIs.
3.5.1 Ground Recurrent training for FOIs shall be conducted annually with the same training
curriculum abridged to spread over two-three days and shall include all changes/ amendments
in the previous year that are pertinent to the assigned tasks.
193
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
3.5.2 All FOIs would be required to undergo the complete type-specific recurrent training on the
aircraft type allocated to them at an ATO/ any other training facility acceptable to DGCA. In
case FOIs are allocated two types for undertaking FOI technical duties, they may be required
to undergo the recurrent training on the second type only once every two years. This training
must be followed by a Proficiency Check. The minimum quantum for FOI type recurrent
training is based on the license currency and validity shall be as approved by DGCA.
The purpose of specialized (or continuation) training is to upgrade the knowledge and
competency of existing inspectors on par with international standards and for efficient
functioning. Specialized and technical training programs are developed by DGCA as
applicable to a particular inspector’s duties e.g., as an OJT/ In-house Instructor. It also involves
special training programs/ schemes like US-India Cooperation project, India-US ACP
program, COSCAP, etc. Duration and content of training is based on the course and the
hosting organization.
3.7.1 All training completed by an inspector will be documented in his or her inspector training file.
3.7.2 Inspectors who complete a formal external or in-house training course will receive a Certificate
of Completion to be added to their inspector training file.
3.7.3 When OJT is delivered to an inspector, the individual OJT activity will be notated on the
inspector’s OJT plan.
3.7.4 The FSD will establish and maintain an inspector training file for each FOI that includes the
following:
(i) License
194
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Note: All FOIs shall maintain their personal folder updated from the time of joining till date with
current PPC/IR. Post release from service, DGCA shall maintain the concerned FOI folder for
2 years from the date of release.
195
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
This course ensures that new DGCA personnel who will be serving as Operations Inspectors,
Cabin Safety Inspectors, or other types of Inspectors have a clear understanding of the Civil
Aviation Requirements (CARs); Inspector Guidance Material; basic job aides and other
materials needed to perform their Inspector job functions.
Successful completion of this training course will prepare new inspectors to begin on-the-job
training (OJT) on all aspects of their core duties.
Duration: Delivered in 22 Modules over 22 training days with 7 training hours per day.
Training Schedule: The course involves direct Instruction, self-study and written evaluation
as per detailed schedule given subsequently.
Training Modes: Class-room verbal instruction supported with hand-outs and reference
materials related to the various training topics, and with student self-study in the form of
reading assignments.
Student: All course participants are expected to fully attend to the presentation of course.
Responsibilities: Material, complete assigned reading and self-study activities on time, and
ask questions as necessary to ensure they thoroughly understand the information provided.
Students also will be expected to complete a course evaluation.
Methodology: The Exam would be comprising of open book test with access to internet.
Failure/Review Policy: A Board headed by CFOI and assigned members would carry out
review on case to case basis and necessary gap training to be provided with emphasis on the
short comings (In case of not achieving a minimum score of 70 %).An extended FOI refresher
of 04 days will be conducted for the candidates who failed for the first attempt.
Any subsequent failure, a notice to improve his/her performance standard and quality of output
to satisfaction of DGCA with in a prescribed period of 15 days for self-study will be provided,
to enhance the lacking part. Any further failure, (In case of not achieving a minimum score of
70 %), such cases from CFOI will be forwarded to JDG and DG for further necessary action.
196
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
197
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
DAY 1
FLIGHT OPERATIONS
INSPECTOR’S COURSE
Mode of ARRIVAL Duration Trainer
Study
--- Arrival and complete documentation at R Cell
Session 1 DGCA Officer
Lecture Introduction to FSD, Administrative Description -
LUNCH BREAK
--- Personal Documentation – DGCA ID, AEP, Vehicle Permit Session 2 ---
LUNCH BREAK
198
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
199
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
200
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
201
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Instruction Review important provisions of Volume IV of CAP 8200 Session 2 DGCA Officer
LUNCH BREAK
202
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
LUNCH BREAK
203
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
LUNCH BREAK
Instruction Review Chapter-wise Provisions of Part D of CAP 8100 Session 3 DGCA Officer
TEA BREAK
Demonstrati Review of Approved Operations Manuals
on Session 4 DGCA Officer
LUNCH BREAK
204
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
Instruction Interaction with DAT Rep and Review CAP 3200 Session 2 DGCA Officer
LUNCH BREAK
Instruction Interaction with DTL Rep and Review Pilot Licensing Session 4 DGCA Officer
Requirements
205
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
LUNCH BREAK
Instruction Follow Up Actions and Monitoring of Deficiencies Session 3 DGCA Officer
TEA BREAK
Instruction Review Job Aid for Ramp Inspections Session 4 DGCA Officer
206
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
TEA BREAK
Instruction MEL Scrutiny and Approval Session 2 DGCA Officer
LUNCH BREAK
MODULE 18 : AIR SAFETY AND FSDS
Instruction Introduction to Air Safety Directorate
Instruction Operators’ Air Safety Functions and Organization Session 3 DGCA Officer
TEA BREAK
Instruction Review CAR 1-A-V
Instruction Operator’s FSDS Manual Standards and Approval Session 4 DGCA Officer
207
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
LUNCH BREAK
Instruction Crew resource management (CRM) training Session 3 DGCA Officer
TEA BREAK
Instruction Training Issues In Automation And Advanced
Technology Flight Decks Session 4 DGCA Officer
Instruction Case Studies : Human Factors and Safety
Test Provide Test Materials And Administer The Examination Session 1 DGCA Officer
Process
208
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
APPENDIX B
This course ensures that former DGCA FOIs who re-join DGCA as Operations Inspectors, are
adequately refreshed with the guidance material needed to perform their Inspector job
functions. Successful completion of this training course will prepare such inspectors to begin
on-the-job training (OJT) refresher on all aspects of their core duties.
Duration: Delivered in 11 Modules over 5 training days with 7 training hours per day.
Training Schedule: The course involves direct Instruction, self-study and written evaluation
as per detailed schedule given subsequently.
Training Modes: Class-room verbal instruction supported with hand-outs and reference
materials related to the various training topics, and with student self-study in the form of
reading assignments.
Student: All course participants are expected to fully attend to the presentation of course.
Methodology: The Exam would be comprising of open book test with access to internet.
Failure/Review Policy: A Board headed by CFOI and assigned members would carry out
review on case to case basis and necessary gap training to be provided with emphasis on the
short comings (In case of not achieving a minimum score of 70 %).An extended FOI refresher
of 04 days will be conducted for the candidates who failed for the first attempt.
Any subsequent failure, a notice to improve his/her performance standard and quality of output
to satisfaction of DGCA with in a prescribed period of 15 days for self-study will be provided,
to enhance the lacking part. Any further failure, (In case of not achieving a minimum score of
70 %), such cases from CFOI will be forwarded to JDG and DG for further necessary action.
209
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
210
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
APPENDIX C
DGCA hires Flight operations Inspectors on contract basis. The inspectors are DGCA license
holders (ATPL(A) for aero plane inspectors or ATPL(H)/CHPL for helicopter inspectors) who
are required to be currently active and medically fit for flying. As DGCA hires currently active
pilots, who on completion of the contract revert to the industry it is essential to keep the license
of such inspectors current.
Only those inspectors who are in possession of current ATPL/ CHPL can undertake
certification activities for both operators and flight crews, subject to the condition that they
have been trainers or have been trained for this duty by DGCA. DGCA will make all attempts
to assign each valid license holding inspector to a operator and the same will fulfill a dual
requirement. Such inspectors will ensure standards within operators maintaining minimum
currency of flying in order to discharge their duties effectively. FOIs need to undergo the
following training in order to maintain the requisite type expertise and currency requirements
in order to effectively undertake their allocated tasks: -
1.1. Undergo annual ground and flying refresher training as applicable to every type
qualified on and required to undertake FOI tasks.
1.2. Undergo a proficiency check every six months/ one year on the type allocated for
undertaking FOI duties.
1.3. FOIs to maintain recency on type if required to occupy crew seats e.g. in case of
helicopters/ aeroplanes below 5700 kg. However, all such approvals will be granted on a case
basis by the JDG/ CFOI.
1.4. Related ground training including DGR, AvSec, CRM and SEP.
2.1. All FOIs to be attached to an operator. The purpose of this attachment is only to
facilitate the training requirements of FOIs and FOIs will not be eligible to undertake any flying
for the operator or avail any benefits from the operator.
2.2. In case of aircraft having specific to type FFS available in India, FOIs to be attached
to operators operating the same type of aircraft. However, the FOI will not be permitted to
undertake any task/ function for the operator he/ she is attached to. This will apply mostly to
FOIs from an airline background and take care of the majority requirements for aircraft such
as A 320, B 737, B 787, B 777, ATR 72 and Q 400.
2.3. In case specific to type FFS is not available in India, FOIs to undergo annual refresher
at authorized ATO abroad. However, the FOI will not be permitted to undertake POI functions
for the operator he/ she is attached to. This implies that FOI may only provide type-related
technical expertise to the POI. This will apply mostly to FOIs performing FOI functions for
aircraft such as Global, Challenger, Gulfstream etc and multi-engine helicopters.
211
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
2.4. FOIs attached to operators where the aircraft has no FFS (e.g. aeroplanes<5700 kg
such as B200 or Pilatus/ single engine helicopters) may undergo annual refresher (ground
and flying) with a TRE.
2.5. Inspectors will be given a maximum of 2 working days per month to enable them to
meet their flying currency requirements.
3. Based on the training provisions above, FOIs will undertake duties as follows: -
3.1. FOIs qualified and undergoing training as per Para 2(b) above will undertake
certification tasks for the same type but for a different operator eliminating conflict of interest.
This will also enhance standardization across the industry.
3.2. FOIs qualified and undergoing training as per Para 2(c) above will undertake
certification tasks for the same type for all operators of the particular type but will not be
permitted to undertake POI functions for the same type to limit the conflict of interest. FOIs will
carry out Examiner/ Instructor release/ standardization for such type of aircraft in an FFS after
themselves undergoing due training and approval of CFOI.
3.3. FOIs qualified and undergoing training as per Para 2(d) above will undertake
certification tasks for the same type for all operators of the particular type of aircraft but will
not be permitted to undertake POI functions for the same type to limit the conflict of interest.
FOIs with prior instructional or supervisory experience will carry out Examiner/ Instructor
release/ standardization for such type of aircraft after due training and approval of CFOI.
4. No FOI will be exercise type privileges on more than two type of aircraft above 5700kg; or
two groups of similar types of aircraft below 5700 kg except with express permission granted
on a case basis by the JDG.
5. In case of FOIs who are not current on a type, CFOI will decide the training syllabus for
the FOI to regain type currency. The FOI will thereafter undergo the training under DGCA
arrangements before commencing FOI duties on type.
The satisfactory execution of the various functions as inspectors depends on the qualifications,
experience, competence and dedication of individual inspectors. In addition to the crucial
212
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
In the interest of enhancing objectivity to the refresher training, the completion of the course
would be concluded with the mandatory written test, minimum passing score is 70%.
Considering the specialized and sensitive nature of the FOI duties, it is essential that each of
person performing inspection and oversight duties be carefully evaluated before continued
carrying out inspector functions. This also addresses the performance assessment condition
of the “Term and conditions of appointment” as flight operation inspector.
METHODOLOGY: The Exam thus conducted would be comprising of open book test with
access to internet.
Failure/Review Policy: Board headed by CFOI and assigned members would carry out
review on case to case basis and necessary gap training would be provided with emphasis on
the short comings. An extended FOI refresher of 04 days will be conducted for the candidates
who failed for the first attempt.
Any subsequent failure, will result in the FOI being stopped from utilizing FOI privileges and a
notice to improve his/her performance standard and quality of output to satisfaction of DGCA
with in a prescribed period of 15 days for self-study will be provided, to enhance the lacking
part .Any further failure, such cases from CFOI will be forwarded to JDG and DG for further
necessary action.
213
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.4.1 The section describes the general responsibilities of the Flight Operations Inspector (FOI).
FOIs of the DGCA’s play a key role in ensuring safety in the field of aviation. This responsibility
for ensuring safety in air travel covers almost every aspect of aviation, including the operation
of aircraft and the certification of aircraft and pilots.
4.4.2 Flight Operations Inspectors are to particularly ensure that: -
(a) Proper analytical reports are filed and submitted promptly to the FSD on their inspections.
(b) Flying and surveillance programmes are submitted in advance of each month.
(d) For important occurrences requiring immediate action, a report is submitted immediately.
(e) Reports on initial flight trials, such as proving or inaugural flights of operators and comments
on Weather Minima are given promptly.
(f) Tasks assigned by other divisions are responded to promptly. Reports may be submitted
through the Director Flight Inspection.
(g) All orders/notices/circulars issued by the Director Flight Inspection are adhered to and
responded to promptly where necessary.
(h) They use their initiative to pursue any matter that needs to be attended to by the DGCA in the
interest of air safety, morale and efficiency of the system.
(i) They ensure that the confidentiality of matters dealing with the reputation of individuals is
always maintained.
(j) They maintain a constant dialogue with operators and officials in the aviation industry on
professional matters in order to keep up to date with latest developments.
4.5.1 The duties and responsibilities of Flight Operations Inspectors are divided into Surveillance,
Certification Inspections and Pilot Certification. These Job Functions cover both ground and
in-flight inspections.
4.5.2 Air Operators Certification. FOIs are heavily involved in the certification of air operators. Some
of the many duties of the FOI in air operator certification are as follows:
214
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.5.3 Pilot Certification. Some of the FOIs certification duties involve the following:
(a) Designate or renew DE/ Examiners/ TRIs/ LTC’s/ Check Pilots/ SFIs etc
(c) Conduct proficiency checks of operators' flight engineers/ navigators (if applicable)
4.5.4 Surveillance.
4.5.5 The specific duties, job functions and responsibilities of all officers in the Flight Standards
Directorate is placed at Appendix to this Chapter.
215
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(a) Investigations are thoroughly conducted in a timely manner with an impartial and unbiased
approach. Required reports are factually and accurately completed and submitted through
channels to designated recipients within established time frames.
(b) Assigned work program activities are effectively prioritized, planned and executed within the
parameters of DGCA office policies.
(c) Technical information provided is accurate and in accordance with DGCA Regulations and policy.
Recommended solutions can be implemented without major revision.
(d) The Deputy CFOI/ CFOI is informed of problems and/or anticipated problems at the earliest
possible time.
(e) Deficiencies and/or problems are promptly communicated through channels to the operator for
corrective action. Follow-up action is initiated to insure correction of the deficiency and/or
problem.
(f) Regular contact with the operator(s) results in knowledge of developments or changes in their
method of doing business.
(g) Effective working relationships are established with assigned air operators.
4.6.2 Certification
(a) Certification actions especially with regard to Certificate Management are accomplished and
documented in accordance with applicable standards and within established time frames.
(b) Responsible for the maintenance/ update of the operator’s documents in the DGCA pertaining to
operations, especially the Operations Manual.
(c) Deficiencies/problems are promptly communicated through channels to the air operator for
corrective action.
(e) All contacts and responses are handled in a courteous and professional manner.
4.6.3 Surveillance
(a) Monitoring activities correctly indicate compliance/non-compliance with the DGCA Regulations.
(b) Deficiencies are promptly communicated through channels to the appropriate management
levels.
(c) Data analysis is continuously performed which detects trends in the operator's safety of
operations.
216
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(d) Safety issues requiring special emphasis are identified and promptly communicated through
channels to the DGCA office and the involved air operator.
(e) An effective working relationship is maintained with the public, industry organizations, and other
governmental agencies. All contacts and responses are handled in a courteous and professional
manner.
4.7.1 Investigations. An additional role is the investigation of aircraft accidents in cooperation with
the Directorate of Air Safety, which is responsible for investigating accidents. Three areas that
FOIs may be required to contribute in investigating are accidents, incidents, and enforcement
actions.
(a) Accidents. FOIs may be required to conduct on-site accident investigations when serious
injuries or fatalities have occurred. The inspector will work closely with the AAIB.
(b) Incidents. FOIs may be required to assist DAS for the investigation of incidents, as
appropriate. Some of the incidents that require investigation are as follows:
(c) Enforcement. FOIs are required to investigate, analyze, and report enforcement findings. In
situations that involve alleged non-compliance with the CARs, FOIs are required to make
recommendations concerning enforcement action.
(a) Two Type Rated FOIs will be deputed to prepare Question Papers/Bank for conduct of Type
Rated Technical Exams. Further Type Rated FOI’s may be tasked to evaluate the question
papers and answer sheets.
(b) Two FOI’s with valid ATPL are also entrusted with preparation of Question Papers/Bank for
CPL and ATPL Exams.
(a) FOI’s are detailed to conduct the ATPL Viva Voce examinations for the pilots upgrading from
CPL and also for Despatchers authorisation. Viva examinations are conducted every three
months. DE/TRIs from the industry are also a part of the DGCA Board conducting Viva Voce
217
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
examinations. As far as possible a type rated FOI is part of the board for despatchers oral
examination.
4.7.5 FOIs may also be required to speak to student groups about career opportunities in the field
of aviation, and may conduct seminars and briefings on pertinent aviation topics for pilots,
dispatchers, and airline officials.
4.7.6 Inspectors may also, from time to time, be called upon to testify in administrative hearings and
trials.
4.8.1 Type rated FOI(two) or a combination of one FOI and one industry type rated expert ( Ideally
a type rated examiner) are assigned the task of setting the question paper for type rating exam
on request of the CEO. They are also to provide the answers to the questions set by them. At
times the question bank may need a update ,and inspectors are also needed for the same.
4.8.2 Type rated FOI(two) or a combination of one FOI and one industry type rated expert (Ideally
a type rated examiner) are assigned the task of vetting the question paper for type rating exam/
question bank as set by A above and verify the answers.
4.8.3 A and B are assigned to different sets of inspectors and industry experts. In the event that
there is any discrepancy in the answers then the two team members will resolve the same
prior to releasing the questions to CEO.
4.8.4 Inspectors to ensure that questions are framed from manufacturer approved documents only.
4.8.5 Inspectors to ensure that questions are framed from the latest version of the documents of the
manufacturer.
4.8.6 Inspectors to ensure that questions are framed in the format as provided by CEO and all CEO
guidelines are followed.
4.8.7 Inspectors must ensure that questions are framed in simple English.
4.8.8 If the services of a industry expert are utilised then it is the inspectors duty to ensure that
guidelines are followed and the individual is briefed accordingly.
4.8.9 ATPL Viva are conducted by a board approved by the Director General, compromising of a
chairperson (JDG/CFOI/ Dy. CFOI or DDG), FOI and industry Expert (DE or TRI).
4.8.10 The chairperson is mostly required to oversee the conduct of the Viva and ensure no bias of
any nature is being exhibited during the interview and also ensure that the interview is
conducted in a amicable manner.
4.8.11 It is the duty of the FOI to ensure that the scope of the Viva is only limited to syllabus as given
in CAR Section 7 Series B part VI and IX.
4.8.12 It is the responsibility of the Inspector to ensure that the industry expert is aware of the scope
of the syllabus and does not go beyond.
218
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.9.1 The following is a synopsis for the qualifications required by an inspector for the carrying out
of the various activities under the Safety Oversight Programme:
(ii) Completion of type rating training on that type of aircraft within the preceding 12 months or if
the initial training was completed more than 12 months, have completed recurrent training and
a proficiency check ; and
(iii) For a type rating either by actual flying or by simulator training as a pilot on any type of aircraft
in scheduled airline service in India.
4.10.1 For the purpose of performing the duties of FOI in terms of AIC 10/ 1991 and exercise the
powers under rule 156 of the Indian Aircraft Rules 1937, Inspectors are authorized by air
Operators to enable and facilitate travel by using ACM (Additional Crew Member) travel
authority, supernumerary or other boarding pass, or with AIC ticketing. Further, the FOI identity
card validates entry and trans-shipment of Inspectors when:
(b) responding to an operator's request for special services (e. g., pilot proficiency checks (PPC),
etc.) involving air travel with that same carrier; and
(c) Accompanying flight crewmembers on familiarization flights, unless the operator provides
otherwise.
219
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.11.1 The flight deck of an aircraft is a close society in which each member is proficient in his/ her
duties and aware of his/ her responsibilities, position and rank. The introduction of an inspector
into this type of environment may create a distraction and possibly add tension. The FOIs
authority can be seen either as a threat to the individual flight crewmember or a challenge to
the Pilot-in-Command's status. While maintaining the status of his/ her own position, the FOI
must recognize and support the Pilot-in-Command's authority unless he/ she is obviously
about to violate a regulation or operate in a hazardous manner. Even in these conditions, the
FOI should at first appear to be acting in an advisory capacity and only resort to the powers
vested in him/ her by the aeronautical legislation as a last resort.
4.11.2 FOI shall, under normal circumstances, make every effort to reserve the use of any observer
seat through the operator's flight dispatch or other designated office prior to scheduled
departure time unless a no notice inspection is planned.
4.11.3 If for some season, such as joining the flight at an en-route stop, the crew could not be
contacted prior to boarding the aircraft, the FOI should identify him/ herself to a cabin crew
and have him/ her present his/ her credentials to the Pilot-in-Command. The cabin crew should
be requested to advise the Pilot-in-Command that an FOI wishes to join the crew on the flight
deck for purposes on an in-flight inspection. The FOIs credentials will constitute the FOIs on
board authority.
4.11.4 At times, FOIs may occupy any observer seat without advanced notice to the operator or
crewmembers. Occasions may arise, such as "ad hoc" inspections, when FOIs will not have
had time to affect prior co-ordination. In this situation, a FOIs approach must demonstrate
courtesy and common sense.
4.11.5 Where an aircraft is equipped with more than one observer seat, the operator shall make
available the observer seat that permits optimal monitoring, by the FOI of the flight deck
instrumentation and controls, and the procedures used by flight crew members.
4.11.6 While on the flight deck, the FOI must avoid distracting the crew. This may not be easy, as
another aspect of the flight deck environment is a degree of boredom brought about by
repetitive duties and routines. The FOI is a new person to talk to, and a new source of
information. A flight deck conversation can be valuable to the FOI as a source of information
and to establish a good relationship with the flight crew but it must be carefully controlled so
as to avoid distractions at critical times.
4.11.7 During the departure and approach phases of a flight, the FOI should silently observe cockpit
policy and procedures. This does not preclude the inspector from advising the crew of a
potential hazard or infraction.
4.11.8 Potential for the type of situation referred to below is minimal. Such situations would likely
occur only during "ad hoc" inspections:
(b) That further denial will be in contravention of Civil Aviation Rules/Regulation, which may be
processed by way of enforcement action.
220
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
4.11.9 If an FOI has reason to believe that an aircraft is unsafe or is about to be operated in an unsafe
manner, he/ she should make all efforts to apprise the DCFOI/ DDG/ CFOI/ JDG by the fastest
means to enable detention action. In case circumstances do not permit such action, he/ she
may detain the aircraft pursuant to Civil Aviation Rule / Regulation. Directing Air Traffic
Services (ATS), where available, to deny take-off clearance could be the best course of action.
This would give the FOI more time to co-ordinate other recourses.
221
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
APPENDIX
In addition to his/her role as a Flight Operations Inspector, CFOI being the head of FSD has
the following functions:
1. Advise and assist the Director General (DG)/ Joint Director General (FSD) in providing
support in the justification of budget estimates, administration of executive decisions, and
development and maintenance of productive relationships with the public, the aviation
community, and other government agencies.
2. Provide for the development, coordination, and execution of the following, and is
accountable to the Director General (DG)/ Joint Director General (FSD) for the adequacy of
DGCA:
4. Provides leadership and direction in the planning, management, and control of office
activities.
In addition to his/her role as a Flight Operations Inspector, DCFOI has the following functions:
222
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
1. To carry out functions assigned in accordance with CAP 3100 for certification of an Air
Operator;
2. To carry out related functions for continuous management of the AOP for the assigned Air
Operator(s);
3. To carry out surveillance of assigned Air Operator as per the laid down surveillance plan;
4. To carry out all certificate management tasks related to one or more assigned ATO/ TRTOs;
7. Any other work assigned by the Director General/ JDG/ CFOI/ DCFOI.
Director (Operations)
1. Administration of FSD;
4. Scrutinizing the documents for Ground Instructor and conduct oral examination.
223
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
12. Any other work assigned by the Director General/ JDG/ CFOI.
1. Administration of FSD;
224
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
6. Maintain record of training of all inspectors/ officers in FSD as per laid down policy;
225
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
5.4 PURPOSE
5.4.1 This section contains direction and guidance for Flight Operations Inspectors (FOI) pertaining
to principles of ethics and conduct as they affect the performance of duties.
5.4.2 Although some hints as regards to personal ethics and conduct in respect of FOIs are outlined
and listed in this section, it may be quite obvious that in many instances an inspector may
encounter abnormal circumstances whose remedial actions could not possibly be explained
or outlined in black and white. Therefore, considering the fact that inspectors are always in the
public eye, they are expected to exercise good judgment and professional behaviour at all
times while on and/or off duty. Two major areas of responsibilities are outlined as below:
(a) Civil Aviation Requirements: Inspectors are required to comply fully with the spirit of the
standards of conduct as set forth by this section; and with those set forth in Regulations, CARs,
circulars and other procedures as required under the ICAO convention and DGCA regulations.
The Authority’s policy on employee conduct is designed to encourage employees to maintain
a level of professionalism that will promote the efficiency of the DGCA and conform to
accepted principles of conduct.
(b) Requirements other than Civil Aviation Regulations: FOIs are exposed to a number of
circumstances that are critical to their positions and which are not pertinent to other job
functions. The inspector has the critical position of frequently interpreting and evaluating the
quality of training programs, looking into the operational standards, inspecting and certifying
various manuals and publications, judging and monitoring the professional standards of pilots
and maintenance manuals, pilot and mechanic performance, and overall safety activities. It is
imperative that all inspectors be sensitive to the responsibilities and demands of their positions
and be objective and impartial while performing their duties. Inspectors must also be sensitive
to actual as well as perceived appearances of any conflict that could disrupt the effectiveness
or credibility of the ‘Flight Standards’ mission.
5.5.1 The conduct of an FOI has a direct bearing on the proper and effective accomplishment of
official job functions and responsibilities. Inspectors are required to approach their duties in a
professional manner and to maintain that attitude throughout their activities. Through their
conduct, inspectors working in direct contact with operators, and with the public, bear great
responsibility in the determination of public perception of the DGCA.
5.6 RULES OF CONDUCT. ALL INSPECTORS MUST OBSERVE THE FOLLOWING RULES
OF CONDUCT:
(a) Report for work on time and in a condition that will permit performance of assigned duties
226
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
(b) Render full and industrious service in the performance of their duties
(d) Respond promptly to directions and instructions received from Chief Flight Operations
Inspector.
(e) Exercise courtesy and tact in dealing with co-workers, supervisors, and members of the
public
(f) Conserve and protect DGCA property, equipment, and materials (Inspectors may not use or
permit others to use DGCA equipment, property, or personnel for other than official business.)
(g) When duties concern the expenditure of public funds, have knowledge of and observe all
applicable legal requirements and restrictions
(h) Safeguard classified information and unclassified information that should not be given general
circulation as provided by DGCA Order (Inspectors shall not disclose or discuss any classified
information or "official use only" information unless specifically authorized to do so.)
(i) Observe the various laws, rules, regulations, and other authoritative instructions, including all
rules, signs, and instructions relating to personal safety
(j) Uphold with integrity the public trust involved in the position to which assigned
(k) Report known or suspected violations of law, regulations, or policy through appropriate
channels
(l) Not engage in private activities for personal gain or any other unauthorized purpose while on
government property
(m) Give any supervisor or official conducting an official investigation or inquiry all
information and testimony about all matters inquired of, arising under the law, rules, and
regulations administered by the DGCA.
(n) Not use illicit drugs or abuse alcohol or other substances (No inspector known to do so will be
permitted to perform any duties related to aviation safety until the DGCA is satisfied that any
such person is no longer a risk to public safety.)
(o) Not make irresponsible, false, or defamatory statements that attack, without foundation, the
integrity of other individuals or organizations (Inspectors are accountable for the statements
they make and the views they express.)
(a) General. The Civil Aviation Department expects FOI’s to conduct themselves off duty in a
manner that will not adversely reflect on the Department’s ability to discharge its mission. FOIs
must conduct themselves while off duty in a manner that will not cause the public to question
227
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
their reliability and trustworthiness in carrying out their responsibilities as employees of the
Civil Aviation Department.
(b) Subversive Activity. No inspector shall become a member of any organization that the
inspector knows advocates the overthrow of the Government of India, or that seeks by force
of violence to deny other persons their rights under the Constitution of India.
(c) Striking. No inspector shall engage in, or encourage another inspector, or any other civil
employee, to engage in a strike, work stoppage, or work slowdown, in a labour management
dispute involving the Government.
(d) Meeting Financial Obligations. All FOIs are expected to meet their private financial obligations
in a proper and timely manner. Failure without sufficient excuse or reason to honour valid
debts, including claims based on court judgments and tax delinquencies, or to make and
adhere to reasonable arrangements for settlement, will constitute grounds for disciplinary
action.
(e) Inaugural Flight and Ceremonial Events. FOIs shall not accept invitations from airlines, aircraft
manufacturers, or other aviation- related businesses, that are subject to DGCA regulations,
for flights or for free transportation in connection with roll-outs and similar ceremonial events.
(g) Business Interests. FOIs and their immediate families should seek clarification and guidance
before engaging in any airline or other business activity for which the Civil Aviation Department
has oversight responsibility. If an inspector holds any interest that may give the appearance
of impropriety, the inspector should immediately consult the CFOI for a determination.
(h) Conflict of Interest. Inspectors may hold employment or own businesses that do not present a
conflict of interest with their official job functions. Inspectors who wish to participate in outside
aviation activities (such as flight instruction, commercial flying, or any other aviation-related
activity) should seek clarification and approval from the DGCA.
(i) Public Speaking. Inspectors may not receive payment for speaking on issues that deal with
their official job functions. Teaching or instructing at colleges, universities, or vocational
schools may be acceptable, but should be coordinated and approved through the CFOI.
(j) Fund Raising. FOIs may not participate in fund raising or soliciting donations from any
business or activity for which their office is assigned oversight responsibility. Exceptions to this
requirement may exist for door prizes for aviation safety seminars by the aviation safety
program. They should be coordinated through the CFOI.
(k) Gifts - Avoiding Conflict of Interest. As per Govt. of India policy, no gift is acceptable. Gifts
should be accepted only when the inspector knows that the gift will not give the appearance
of a conflict of interest. Inspectors shall exercise the utmost discretion when giving or receiving
gifts.
228
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
5.8 DRESS
5.8.1 FOIs should be aware that their personal appearance affects their professional image;
therefore, they should adhere to the guidelines below:
(a) On visits to air operator facilities, FOI should dress semi-formally (Jacket and tie (optional) for
men, dress or slacks for women).
(b) During pilot proficiency checks in aircraft or simulators, the semi- formal wear noted above is
recommended, regardless of air operator.
(c) During training FOIs dress should be compatible with the air operator’s practice but should
lean towards formality.
(d) During in-flight inspection, the sight of a non-uniformed person moving in and out of the flight
deck can be disturbing to hijack -Conscious passengers. For this reason, FOIs should maintain
a low profile, dress conservatively, restrict movements between cabin and flight decks and
wear the Airport Security Pass.
(e) When conducting FOI duties at an airport, the Airport Security Pass must be used to follow
crew access routes and shall be worn at all times on the ramp and air-side of the terminal.
229
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
6.4 GENERAL.
This section contains information for inspectors concerning the types of Flight Operations
Inspector (FOI) credentials and the inspector eligibility requirements and application
procedures for those credentials. This section also contains direction and guidance to be used
by inspectors when employing FOI credentials during the performance of inspector tasks.
(a) DGCA Inspector Identification that identifies as an “Authorized Person” for the purpose of rule
156 of the Indian Aircraft Rules 1937 and in terms of AIC 10/ 1991 and authorized to perform
the duties and exercise the powers under said rule; and
(b) Functionary Identification from Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) which provides for
access to different areas of any Indian airport and aircraft, as indicated on the credential
6.6.1 Operations FOIs currently assigned to positions involving air transportation inspections and
surveillance are eligible to receive the DGCA credential; however, the inspector must have
also completed the FOIOC course.
6.6.2 To be eligible for the BCAS credential, the FOI must possess (or be concurrently issued) the
DGCA credential; have undergone DGR training as required by BCAS; and have a job function
that requires the conduct of inspections.
6.7.1 Inspectors shall apply for the two credentials by completing an application for a DGCA
Inspector Credential and a BCAS Credential in accordance with the procedures. The
applications would be routed through the respective DCFOI/ DDG to the CFOI for further
action.
6.7.2 To expedite the issuance of the credentials, the application may be initiated before the
inspector meets the training and qualification requirements outlined in this manual.
230
CAP 8200
Flight Operations Volume 4
Inspector Manual
Revision 0 April 2022
6.8.1 Although the credentials contain the general authorization for the inspector to conduct DGCA
functions, specified work functions may only be performed after the inspector has been
authorized by an appropriate supervisor and has satisfied the training and qualification
requirements specified in this manual. The work functions for the two credentials are as
follows:
(a) DGCA’s Inspector Credential. The DGCA Inspector credential identifies an individual as an
“authorized Person” for the purposes of rule 156 of the Indian Aircraft Rules 1937 and in terms
of AIC 10/ 1991 and authorizes that individual to perform the duties and exercise the powers
under the rules. These official duties include the conduct of cockpit enroute inspections. An
inspector who meets all training and qualification requirements, with the exception of not yet
possessing an airplane type rating, may conduct cabin enroute inspections.
(b) BCAS Credential. The BCAS credential contains authorization for an inspector to be given
free and uninterrupted access to restricted areas at airports while the inspector is performing
official duties to the extent stated on the credential. These official duties include inspections
such as ramp inspections. An inspector must display this credential on an outer garment to be
permitted entry airport secured areas, and while working in these areas. While employing the
BCAS credential, inspectors should consider the following procedures:
(i) Physical Barriers. Although this credential is an authorization for inspectors to be in secured
areas, for physical barriers such as locked doors and gates, an inspector may need to seek
local assistance to gain access. Inspectors should ask at the time of entry if the operator has
any specific security program practices and procedures that need to be followed.
(ii) Passenger Screening Points. Inspectors approaching passenger screening points may not
bypass that screening; however, if the inspector is unable to afford the delay that may be
involved in passenger screening, then arrangements should be made with the airport or
operator personnel to enter the secured areas at other entry points.
If either one or both of these credentials are lost, stolen, or damaged, the inspector should
report the occurrence immediately to the inspector's supervisor and to the Chief of the Flight
Standards Directorate.
231