Melting Characteristics of C-Type Filler Metal in GTAW

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 16

WELDING

RESEARCH

Melting Characteristics of C-Type Filler Metal in GTAW

A C-type filler metal’s effect on deposition rate, penetration depth, and


metal transfer is analyzed

BY M. CHEEPU, H. J. BAEK, Y. S. KIM, AND S. M. CHO

Abstract Keywords
A C-type filler metal was developed to overcome ■ Gas Tungsten Arc Welding (GTAW)
the low deposition rate (DR) of gas tungsten arc ■ Filler Metal
welding (GTAW). The present study investigated ■ C-Type Filler Metal
the maximum DR for a novel C-type filler metal ■ Welding Wire
and compared it to conventional circular welding ■ Deposition Rate (DR)
wires during GTAW using an Alloy 625 filler metal. ■ Fusion Depth/Penetration Depth
For comparison with conventional circular welding
■ Metal Transfer
wires, a ø1.2-mm (0.047-in.) welding wire, which
■ Continuous Bridging Transfer
■ Welding Current
is most widely used in practice, and a ø2.4-mm ■ Filler Metal Current
(0.094-in.) welding wire, which has almost the same
sectional area as the novel C-type filler metal, were
used in this research. An industrial robot was utilized Introduction
to produce bead-on-plate welds in the flat position.
Excellent welding quality can be obtained via automatic gas
The results revealed that at the same 200-A welding
tungsten arc welding (GTAW) with a filler metal if continuous
current, the DR of the C-type filler metal was higher bridging transfer is implemented. However, the productivity
than the conventional circular welding wires by 1.17 of automatic GTAW with a conventional circular welding wire
to 1.4 times according to the sectional area of the is low. Therefore, many technologies have been developed to
circular welding wires. At a high welding current of increase the deposition rate (DR) of GTAW (Ref. 1). A higher
500 A, it was impossible for the ø1.2-mm welding DR requires a higher welding current and speed. However,
wire to deposit quality welds, and the acceptable humping beads may appear in the high-current region of
range of the DR for the ø2.4-mm welding wire was GTAW (Ref. 2).
narrow (i.e., 7–8 kg/h [15.4–17.6 lb/h]). However, Therefore, a C-type filler metal was developed as the filler
the acceptable range of the DR for the C-type filler metal of GTAW to increase the DR in the high-current region
metal was as broad as 5.04–12.1 kg/h (11.1–26.6 (Ref. 3). The wide and unique shape of the C-type filler metal
lb/h) under the high welding current of 500 A. could prevent high arc pressure on the weld pool when used in
high-current GTAW. Additionally, a high DR could be obtained
The maximum DR of the C-type filler metal was
even though a cold filler metal was used (Refs. 4–6). Hence,
1.51 times that of the ø2.4-mm welding wire. The
GTAW with a C-type filler metal is more effective for weld
mechanism of obtaining a high DR using the C-type overlay and wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) (Refs. 7,
filler metal was analyzed from the viewpoint of the 8). Obtaining a small and stable fusion depth is important in
continuous bridging transfer at the melting edge of the overlay and WAAM. For the purpose of this paper, fusion
the C-type filler metal. The ability of the C-type filler depth shall be referred to as penetration depth. This penetra-
metal to achieve high DRs at high-current regions tion depth may be affected by metal transfer from the melting
was superior to the conventional ø1.2- and ø2.4-mm edge of the filler metal to the weld pool (Ref. 9). However,
welding wires. before this research, a direct comparison between C-type
filler metals and circular welding wires in terms of metal
transfer and penetration depth had not been performed.

https://doi.org/10.29391/2023.102.016
SEPTEMBER 2023 | 201-s
Fig. 1 — Cross-sectional area of a newly developed
C-type filler metal. Fig. 2 — Definition and measurement of the bead
geometry. Note: penetration depth = P, bead width =
W, and reinforcement height = H.

A B

Fig. 3 — Schematic of GTAW with a C-type filler metal: A — Front view; B — side view.

In general, arc radiation may partially melt the filler metal conical angle was 40 deg and the truncated tip size was 1.5
during GTAW, but the plasma stream of the arc can melt it mm (0.059 in.) for 500 A. A mixed gas of Ar + 7%H2 was used
primarily. We considered the plasma stream to obtain a high as the shielding gas at a flow rate of 20 L/min (5 gal/min).
DR of the C-type filler metal (Refs. 6, 7, 10). The stand-off distance between the electrode and the base
This study aimed to establish a model for metal transfer and metal was 5 mm, which was kept before welding. Before arc
penetration depth using GTAW at a current of 200 and 500 starting, the filler metal height between the filler tip bottom
A with C-type filler metals and conventional welding wires. and the substrate surface was set to 0 mm, and the filler metal
In addition, the maximum DRs at each welding current were distance between the filler tip and the electrode center was
investigated for the C-type filler metals and circular welding set to 0 mm. The experiments were conducted using the
wires. The melting edge and bridge of the filler metal in the standard procedure described in ISO/TR 18491, Welding and
arc were observed using a welding camera. allied processes — Guidelines for measurement of welding
energies (Refs. 11–13). An industrial six-axis robot was used to
produce the beads. The waveforms of the welding arc voltage
Experimental Procedure were monitored using an arc monitoring system for GTAW.
The in-situ observations on the metal transfer behavior of
An ASTM A283 plate (t = 10 mm [0.39 in.]) was used as a the three welding wires/filler metals in various conditions
substrate for the bead-on plate welds using GTAW with Alloy were captured using a welding camera at a frame rate of 50
625 (ERNiCrMo-3) filler metal. Three types of filler metals/ fps. The welds were cross sectioned and polished for mac-
welding wires were used in the experiments. These were a rosection analysis. The penetration depth was measured
ø1.2-mm (0.047-in.) welding wire (usually used in automatic using software after etching the cross sections.
GTAW), a ø2.4-mm (0.094-in.) welding wire (the cross- Figure 2 shows the measured geometry of the welds: pen-
sectional area is the same as a C-type filler metal), and a etration depth, bead width, and reinforcement height. The
newly developed C-type filler metal of 5 mm2 (width: 5 mm deepest penetration depth of the bead was considered the
[0.196 in.]; thickness: 1 mm [0.039 in.]) — Fig. 1. penetration depth. The penetration depth was calculated by
A tungsten electrode (W-electrode) with a diameter of 4 taking the average of the three cross sections. Penetration
mm (0.157 in.) was used. The conical angle was 30 deg and depths greater than 0.3 mm (0.011 in.) and less than 3.0 mm
the truncated tip size was 0.5 mm (0.019 in.) for 200 A. The (0.118 in.) were considered. If the penetration depth is smaller

202-s | WELDING JOURNAL


Table 1 — Welding Parameters Used with Different Welding Wires and Filler Metals at 200 A

Welding Conditions Results

Ø1.2-mm welding wire

Welding Welding Filler metal Deposition Deposition Penetration


current speed feed speed area rate depth W/H Remarks
(A) (cm/min) (cm/min) (mm2) (kg/h) (mm)

200 11.0 1.10 1.68 4.22 Good

250 13.8 1.39 1.25 3.35 Good

300 16.5 1.67 1.01 2.67 Good

350 19.3 1.94 0.93 2.19 Good

200 20.0 400 22.0 2.21 0.81 1.89 Good

450 24.8 2.49 0.71 1.53 Good

488 26.8 2.70 — — Sticking

540 29.7 2.99 — — Sticking

630 34.7 3.49 — — Sticking

Ø2.4-mm welding wire

44.0 9.94 1.00 1.29 5.28 Good

66.0 14.9 1.50 0.82 3.69 Good

88.0 19.9 2.00 0.70 3.14 Good


200 20.0
110 24.9 2.50 0.62 2.75 Good

132 29.8 3.00 0.57 2.28 Good

154 34.8 3.50 — — Sticking

C-type filler metal

40.0 10.0 1.00 1.17 5.46 Good

60.0 15.0 1.51 0.74 4.01 Good

80.0 20.0 2.01 0.62 3.21 Good

200 20.0 100 25.0 2.52 0.52 2.68 Good

120 30.0 3.02 o.47 2.32 Good

140 35.0 3.52 0.41 1.99 Good

160 40.0 4.03 — — Sticking

SEPTEMBER 2023 | 203-s


Table 1 — continued

Welding Conditions Results

C-type filler metal

Welding Welding Filler metal Deposition Deposition Penetration


current speed feed speed area rate depth W/H Remarks
(A) (cm/min) (cm/min) (mm2) (kg/h) (mm)

40.0 5.00 1.00 1.33 5.29 Good

60.0 7.50 1.51 0.89 3.95 Good

80.0 10.0 2.01 0.63 3.13 Good

200 40.0 100 12.5 2.52 0.58 2.63 Good

120 15.0 3.02 0.51 2.26 Good

140 17.5 3.52 0.42 1.74 Good

160 20.0 4.03 — — Sticking

than 0.3 mm, welding defects such as insufficient penetra- metal feed speed (mm/s), U is the welding speed (mm/s), the
tion depth and lack of penetration depth may appear in any DR is measured in kg/h, ρ F is the density of the filler metal
weld. If the penetration depth is larger than 3.0 mm, dilution (g/mm3 [the density of Alloy 625 is 0.0084 g/mm3]), NHI
increases in overlay welding and worsens the wall resolution is the net heat input (J/mm), ηa is the arc efficiency, I is the
in WAAM. The penetration depth data of the welds, which welding current (A), E is the voltage (V), and NHIR is the net
included tunnel defects, undercuts, and humping beads, were heat input ratio (J/mm3).
excluded. The process setup with the C-type filler metal is
shown in Fig. 3.
The welding conditions used in the experiments are
Results and Discussion
listed in the Welding Conditions section of Tables 1 and 2.
The deposition area (DA) and DR were calculated using the Bead Appearance and Macrosection
cross-sectional area of the filler metal, filler metal feed speed, of the Welds
and welding speed, as given in Equations 1 and 2.
Figure 4A shows the typical bead appearance of the welds
made with a ø1.2-mm welding wire, ø2.4-mm welding wire,
DA = (AF × FFS) / U (1) and C-type filler metal at a welding current of 200 A. The bead
appearances were almost similar at a DR of 1 kg/h (2.2 lb/h)
for the two welding wires in the presence of uniform bead
ripples formed by intermittent bridging transfer. In the case
of the C-type filler metal, the bead surface was smooth, owing
DR = (A! × FFS × ρ! ) × 3600/1000 (2) to the continuous bridging transfer. However, when the DR
was increased to 2.5 kg/h (5.5 lb/h), the ø1.2-mm welding
wire showed signs of slight sticking, whereas the ø2.4-mm
welding wire and C-type filler metal showed sound beads.
Further increasing the DR resulted in more sticking at the DR
NHI = η! × (I × E) / U (3)
of 2.7 kg/h (5.9 lb/h) for the ø1.2-mm welding wire. On the
contrary, for the ø2.4-mm welding wire, sticking appeared
at the DR of 3.5 kg/h (7.7 lb/h).
In this study, only sound beads without sticking were con-
NHIR = NHI/DA = η! × (I × E)/(A" × FFS) (4) sidered to determine the maximum DR. Sticking and humping
beads were considered defects, as seen in Tables 1 and 2.
DuPont and Marder (Ref. 14) investigated the maximum DR
where the DA of the bead cross section is in mm2, AF is the of GTAW and plasma arc welding. The maximum volumetric
cross-sectional area of the filler metal (mm2), FFS is the filler filler metal (ø1.2-mm welding wire) feeding speed limit was

204-s | WELDING JOURNAL


Table 2 — Welding Parameters Used with Different Welding Wires and Filler Metals at 500 A

Welding Conditions Results

Ø1.2-mm welding wire

Welding Welding Filler metal Deposition Deposition Penetration


current speed feed speed area rate depth W/H Remarks
(A) (cm/min) (cm/min) (mm2) (kg/h) (mm)

20.0 900 49.5 5.00 — — Humping

40.0 900 24.8 5.00 — — Humping

900 16.5 5.00 — — Humping


500
1443 26.5 8.00 — —
60.0 Unstable
1623 30.0 9.00 — — welding wire
feeding
2165 39.7 12.00 — —

Ø2.4-mm welding wire

20.0 220 49.7 5.01 — — Humping

40.0 220 24.9 5.01 — — Humping

220 16.6 5.01 — — Humping

264 19.9 6.01 — — Humping

308 23.2 7.01 2.86 2.71 Good


500
352 26.5 8.01 2.53 2.47 Good
60.0
396 29.8 9.02 — — Sticking

440 33.1 10.02 — — Sticking

483 36.4 11.00 — — Sticking

527 39.7 12.01 — — Sticking

C-type filler metal

160 40.0 4.03 — — Humping

200 50.0 5.04 4.72 4.26 Good

240 60.0 6.05 3.69 3.78 Good


500 20.0
280 70.0 7.05 2.43 3.67 Good

320 80.0 8.06 1.78 3.18 Good

360 90.0 9.07 1.28 2.65 Good

SEPTEMBER 2023 | 205-s


Table 2 — continued

Welding Conditions Results

C-type filler metal

Welding Welding Filler metal Deposition Deposition Penetration


current speed feed speed area rate depth W/H Remarks
(A) (cm/min) (cm/min) (mm2) (kg/h) (mm)

400 100 10.0 1.09 2.38 Good

440 110 11.0 0.87 2.25 Good


20.0
480 120 12.1 0.61 1.84 Good

520 130 13.1 — — Sticking

160 20.0 4.03 — — Humping

200 25.0 5.04 4.76 3.38 Good

240 30.0 6.05 3.81 3.41 Good

280 35.0 7.05 2.57 3.17 Good

320 40.0 8.06 2.12 2.71 Good


40.0
360 45.0 9.07 1.61 2.54 Good

400 50.0 10.0 1.15 2.32 Good

440 55.0 11.0 0.95 1.96 Good


500
480 60.0 12.1 0.69 1.65 Good

520 65.0 13.1 — — Sticking

160 13.3 4.03 — — Humping

200 16.7 5.04 3.06 2.75 Good

240 20.0 6.05 2.93 2.11 Good

280 23.3 7.05 2.64 2.40 Good

320 26.7 8.06 2.24 2.23 Good


60.0
360 30.0 9.07 1.49 1.98 Good

400 33.3 10.0 1.16 1.80 Good

440 36.7 11.0 0.90 1.59 Good

480 40.0 12.1 0.71 1.45 Good

520 43.3 13.1 — — Sticking

206-s | WELDING JOURNAL


A

Fig. 4 — Typical bead appearances according to the DR.

130 mm3/s (3.5 kg/h), owing to its low thermal efficiency to 12.1 kg/h (11 to 26.6 lb/h). The sticking started to form at a
and far wire movement from the arc column by large lateral DR of 13 kg/h (28.6 lb/h) for the C-type filler metal whereas
vibrations at 400 A. In contrast, in this study of the welding the sticking occurred at a DR of 9 kg/h (19.8 lb/h) for the
current at 200 A, the bead appearance of the C-type filler ø2.4-mm welding wire.
metal was sound at the same DR of 3.5 kg/h without any Figure 5 exhibits the macrosection of welds for the
sticking. Furthermore, at the same 200-A current for the ø1.2-mm welding wire, ø2.4-mm welding wire, and C-type
C-type filler metal, sticking occurred when the DR increased filler metal at currents of 200 and 500 A. The penetration
to 4 kg/h (8.8 lb/h). depths were measured using macrosections. The penetration
Figure 4B shows the bead appearance at 500 A. The ø1.2- depths gradually decreased with the DR of all types of filler
and ø2.4-mm welding wires formed humping beads at a DR metals. Also, the reinforcement height gradually increased
of 5 kg/h (11 lb/h). Shirali et al. (Ref. 15) mentioned that the with the DR.
weld bead geometry changed according to the welding cur-
rent and caused humping and undercut defects during GTAW
without the addition of filler metal. In this study, humping
Effect of Process Parameters and Filler
also appeared in the beads with the addition of welding wires Metal Shape on Penetration Depth
because the welding current was very high at 500 A. Mean-
while, the bead appearances of the C-type filler metal were The results data on penetration depth and width/height
sound without any imperfections at DRs ranging from 5.04 (W/H) are listed in the Results section in Tables 1 and 2.

SEPTEMBER 2023 | 207-s


A

Fig. 5 — Macrosections according to the DR.

208-s | WELDING JOURNAL


A B

Fig. 6 — Relation between the DR and penetration depth.

Fig. 7 — Relation between the NHIR and penetration Fig. 8 — A — Definition of plasma stream inflow angle
depth of the ø1.2-mm welding wire, ø2.4-mm welding θ; B — plasma stream inflow to the filler metal’s top
wire, and C-type filler metal at different welding surface of the ø2.4-mm welding wire and C-type filler
currents. metal.

Figure 6 shows the relationship between penetration 7–8 kg/h (15.3–17.6 lb/h) for the ø2.4-mm welding wire was
depth and the DR for the ø1.2-mm welding wire, ø2.4-mm narrow. However, the acceptable DR range for the C-type
welding wire, and C-type filler metal at 200 and 500 A. In filler metal was as broad as 5.04–12.1 kg/h. At 500 A, the
these two levels of welding currents, penetration depth maximum DR for the C-type filler metal was 1.51 times that of
decreased as the DR increased. Penetration depth by the the ø2.4-mm welding wire. For the same kind of filler metals,
C-type filler metal was lower than the ø1.2- and ø2.4-mm the maximum DR with 500 A was higher than with 200 A
welding wires under the same welding current and DR. Addi- because the energy density of 500 A was higher than that
tionally, penetration depth was not deep even though the of 200 A (Ref. 16). At the same current of 200 A, penetration
welding current was high at 500 A for the C-type filler metal. depth was deepest in the ø1.2-mm welding wire followed by
The effect of filler metal feed speed on penetration depth the ø2.4-mm welding wire. The C-type filler metal had the
was similar to the DR in that penetration depth decreased lowest penetration depth. At 500 A, the penetration depth of
as the filler metal feed speed increased. This was because the C-type filler metal was lower than the ø2.4-mm welding
the DR was proportional to the filler metal feed speed for wire. Lower penetration depths are needed for some appli-
the same filler metal, as given in Equation 2. The acceptable cations with high DRs, such as overlay welding and WAAM.
range, which is shown in Fig. 6, was considered based on the Figure 7 shows the relationship between the net heat input
sound welds without humping and sticking. ratio (NHIR) and penetration depth for the ø1.2- and ø2.4-mm
The maximum DR at a welding current of 200 A was 2.5 welding wires and the C-type filler metal. Penetration depth
kg/h for a ø1.2-mm welding wire, 3.0 kg/h (6.6 lb/h) for a was linearly proportional to the NHIR for the ø1.2-mm
ø2.4-mm welding wire, and 3.5 kg/h for a C-type filler metal. welding wire, ø2.4-mm welding wire, and C-type filler metal. In
At the same welding current of 200 A, the maximum DR of the the authors’ previous research on C-type filler metals, pene-
C-type filler metal was 1.4 times that of the ø1.2-mm welding tration depth could be estimated using the NHIR during GTAW
wire and 1.17 times that of the ø2.4-mm welding wire. At a (Ref. 4). At the same NHIR, penetration depth was deepest for
welding current of 500 A, the ø1.2-mm welding wire could the ø1.2-mm welding wire, medium for the ø2.4-mm welding
not deposit the sound bead, and the acceptable DR range of wire, and shallowest for the C-type filler metal at the same

SEPTEMBER 2023 | 209-s


A

Fig. 9 — A — Comparison of metal transfer modes between the welding wires and C-type filler metal at a DR
of 1 kg/h (I = 200 A, U = 20 cm/min); B — in-situ welding camera images of the filler metal’s melting edge and
molten bridge for the welding wires and C-type filler metal at a DR of 1 kg/h (I = 200 A, U = 20 cm/min).

welding current. Because of their varying cross-sectional penetration depth at the same welding current and shape of
areas, the filler metal feeding speeds for the three distinct the filler metal. The penetration depth estimation equation
filler metals/welding wires were not the same. At the same for each welding wire was developed by modifying the C-type
filler metal feed speed, the penetration depth of the ø1.2-mm filler metal’s equation using a wide range of experimental
welding wire was deeper than the others. Additionally, the data. Based on the aforementioned results, it can be said
ø2.4-mm welding wire was much deeper than the C-type that penetration depth is governed by the NHIR, welding
filler metal. The filler metal feed speed or the DR effected current, and shape of the filler metal.

210-s | WELDING JOURNAL


Fig. 10 — A dynamic series of metal transfers for the ø1.2-mm welding wire, ø2.4-mm welding wire, and C-type
filler metal at a welding current of 200 A and a DR of 1 kg/h.

Effect of Plasma Stream Flow on the Metal Transfer Characteristics in the


Welding Wire and C-Type Filler Metal Welding Wires and C-Type Filler Metal
The current density of the plasma stream during GTAW Figures 9A and B show the arc voltage signals and in-situ
can be considered as the Gaussian distribution (Ref. 16). images captured by the welding camera during metal trans-
The plasma stream inflow angle θ to filler metal surface was fer from the filler metal to the weld pool in the ø1.2-mm
defined as the angle between the plasma stream and the welding wire, ø2.4-mm welding wire, and C-type filler metal
tangential line of the surface — Fig. 8A. The plasma stream at a DR of 1 kg/h (I = 200 A, U = 20 cm/min [7.87 in./min]).
inflow efficiency was sin θ. The melting characteristics of the The arc voltage for autogenous GTAW was used as a reference
filler metals depended on the following: 1) the energy den- at an arc length of 5 mm. For the voltage waveforms of the
sity of the plasma stream; 2) the inflow angle of the plasma ø1.2- and ø2.4-mm welding wires, the lower voltage meant
stream; and 3) the filler metal surface area of the plasma bridging and the higher voltage meant separation. Intermit-
stream inflow. tent bridging transfers occurred in the ø1.2- and ø2.4-mm
Figure 8B illustrates the plasma stream on the surface of the welding wires, but continuous bridging transfer occurred
ø2.4-mm welding wire and the C-type filler metal. The melting in the C-type filler metal. The bridging sustainability of the
edges of both were positioned at the center of the electrode. welding wires was weak because the bridge was connected
The ø2.4-mm welding wire was used because it has the same at the center point of the cross section in the welding wires.
cross-sectional area as the C-type filler metal. The inflow angle θ However, the bridging sustainability of the C-type filler metal
from the center (θ = 90 deg) to the edge (θ = 0 deg) decreased was strong because the bridge was connected at the bottom
rapidly for the welding wire, but for the C-type filler metal, the point of the cross section in the C-type filler metal. The melt-
angle from the center (θ = 90 deg) to the edge (θ = 70 deg) ing characteristics of the welding wires and C-type filler metal
decreased gradually. The plasma streamline inflow energy was were intermittent, and the continuous bridging transfer modes
the product of the plasma stream inflow efficiency sin θ and are shown in Fig. 9B. The separation and bridging of the wires
the area of the filler metal surface. The arc length was defined with the molten droplets are indicated in the images.
as the distance between the bottom of the electrode tip and The dynamic series of metal transfer images for the
the surface of the substrate. The arc length distance was kept ø1.2-mm welding wire, ø2.4-mm welding wire, and C-type
constant at 5 mm for both the welding wire and filler metal. The filler metal are shown in Fig. 10. Even though these three
total inflow energy of the arc plasma on the C-type filler metal welding wires/filler metals had the same welding current
surface was higher than the welding wire. Therefore, the C-type of 200 A and a DR of 1 kg/h, their metal transfer behaviors
filler metal’s absorption of plasma inflow energy was higher than were different. Metal transfer occurrences in series were
the circular welding wire’s even though its cross-sectional area observed and depicted schematically. Even though the filler
was the same. Therefore, the maximum DR of the C-type filler metal height before arc starting was 0 mm for all the welding
metal was higher than the wire at the same welding current. wires/filler metals, separation happened due to the broken

SEPTEMBER 2023 | 211-s


A B

Fig. 11 — Change in weld pool current and filler metal current during the separation (A), bridging (B), and
waveforms (C) of the arc voltage and filler metal voltage of the C-type filler metal.

bridge between the welding wire/filler metal and the weld the C-type filler metal waveform was linear and stable with
pool because the bridging suitability was weak. On the other no voltage fluctuations at the same DR. Such a stable voltage
hand, the C-type filler metal showed continuous bridging waveform indicates a continuous bridging metal transfer for
transfer because the bridging sustainability was strong. the C-type filler metal. As a result, the metal transfer char-
Figure 11 shows the change in weld pool current and filler acteristics of the welds made with the ø1.2- and ø2.4-mm
metal current during the separation (Fig. 11A), bridging (Fig. welding wires differed from those of the C-type filler metal,
11B), and waveforms (Fig. 11C) of the arc voltage and filler resulting in the maximum DR for the C-type filler metal.
metal voltage of the C-type filler metal (Ref. 5). The total Figure 12B shows dynamic series images of the melting
arc current equaled the sum of the filler metal current and process in the welding wires and C-type filler metal at a DR
weld pool current. Based on what is shown in Fig. 11C, during of 3.5 kg/h. The dynamic series of images revealed sticking
separation, the filler voltage was higher than the bridging, of the ø1.2-mm welding wire with indications of an unmelted
so the filler metal resistance was higher than the bridging. welding wire behind the electrode center, which progressively
Therefore, during bridging, the filler metal current could be created a ring shape. During sticking, the bended wire was
high and the weld pool current could be low. While bridging close to the electrode, which lowered the voltage potential.
transfer happened in the C-type filler metal, penetration The welding wire melted quickly from the plasma stream
depth was low and a humping bead could be prevented due then moved backward, which raised the voltage potential
to the low weld pool current — Fig. 11B. Additionally, the max- between the electrode tip and the weld pool, as shown by
imum DR of the C-type filler metal obtained was very high the voltage waveforms. Similarly, the ø2.4-mm welding wire
due to the high filler metal current. exhibited comparable sticking behavior, with the exception of
Figures 12A and B show the arc voltage signals and in-situ the presence of the extended unmelted welding wire behind
images for a DR of 3.5 kg/h (I = 200 A, U = 20 cm/min). It the electrode center. Examination of the dynamic series
was identified that welding wire sticking arose in the ø1.2- images, however, indicated that there was no difference in
and ø2.4-mm circular welding wires, whereas continuous the continuous bridging transfer in the case of the C-type
bridging arose in the C-type filler metal. Interrupted voltage filler metal. As mentioned earlier, this was due to the high filler
signals were observed in the waveform for the welds made current and plasma stream inflow of the C-type filler metal
with both the ø1.2- and ø2.4-mm welding wires, indicating advancing melting efficiency compared to the welding wires.
that the unmelted welding wire tip stuck to the weld bead and Figures 13A and B show the arc voltage signals and in-situ
interfered with arc stability and bead formation. In contrast, images for a DR of 5 kg/h, I = 500 A, U = 60 cm/min [23.6

212-s | WELDING JOURNAL


A

Fig. 12 — A — Comparison of the metal transfer modes between the welding wires and C-type filler metal at a
DR of 3.5 kg/h (I = 200 A, U = 20 cm/min); B — dynamic series images of the melting process in the welding
wires and C-type filler metal at a DR of 3.5 kg/h (I = 200 A, U = 20 cm/min).

in./min]). For the autogenous GTAW, the waveform was char- Hence, the melting edge of the wire was situated in front of
acterized by significant voltage fluctuations. This was due the arc, increasing the distance between it and the weld pool.
to the high arc pressure, which caused deep and shallow When welding with the ø2.4-mm welding wire, the intensity
depressions in the weld bead. Furthermore, deep and shallow of the arc pressure was slightly reduced, and a minor number
depressions resulted in the generation of weld beads with of deep and shallow depressions were generated. The wave-
humps and valleys. With waveform voltage fluctuations, a form showed that the voltage fluctuated less for the ø2.4-mm
similar phenomenon was observed for the ø1.2-mm welding welding wire than for the ø1.2-mm welding wire. When identify-
wire. However, the voltage variation during deep and shal- ing the waveform of the C-type filler metal, the voltage signals
low depressions was smaller than during autogenous GTAW. were linear and stable with no variations. Therefore, the C-type
Therefore, even though the ø1.2-mm welding wire was fed filler metal can withstand a high arc pressure and maintain a
into the arc column, the effect of arc pressure on the weld continuous bridging transfer while also maintaining the link
pool was still greater, causing humping beads. Consequently, between the filler metal and the weld pool. As mentioned earlier,
the size or cross-sectional area of the ø1.2-mm welding wire varying deep depressions caused by the ø1.2-mm welding wire,
could not withstand the arc pressure and construct a strong ø2.4-mm welding wire, and C-type filler metal are apparent in
metal transfer bridge between the filler metal and weld pool. the still images — Fig. 13B. The weld pool depression size of

SEPTEMBER 2023 | 213-s


A

Fig. 13 — A — Comparison of metal transfer modes between the welding wires and C-type filler metal at a DR
of 5 kg/h (I = 500 A, U = 60 cm/min); B — in-situ welding camera images of the filler metal’s melting edge and
molten bridge for the welding wires and C-type filler metal at a DR of 5 kg/h (I = 500 A, U = 60 cm/min).

the ø1.2-mm welding wire was bigger than the ø2.4-mm weld- the C-type filler metal was located at the center of the elec-
ing wire followed by the C-type filler metal. The lower voltage trode, where the plasma stream was stronger and enabled the
occurred due to the shallow depression, and the higher voltage C-type filler metal to melt efficiently at higher DRs. However,
occurred due to the deep deformation. The shallow depression there was a difference in the metal transfer bridge connec-
occurred through a bridging transfer. Deep depression occurred tivity in that the C-type filler metal had a thick bridge as well
due to the separation of the bridge — Fig. 13A. as a high bridge connectivity. Simultaneously, the wires had
Figures 14A and B show the arc voltage signals and in-situ slender bridges, and their bridge connectivity was low.
images for a DR of 9 kg/h (I = 500 A, U = 60 cm/min). Inter- However, when the DR was low, which meant the filler
rupted voltage signals were observed in the waveform for the metal feeding speed was slow, the melting edge of the weld-
welds made with the ø2.4-mm welding wire due to the wire ing wires were away from the electrode center. The plasma
sticking. In contrast, the waveform of the C-type filler metal was stream melted the welding wires by generating a big drop,
stable, indicating that a continuous bridging transfer occurred. which detached from the welding wires’ tips and was trans-
The observations of in-situ images revealed sticking of the ported to the weld pool when they became large enough.
ø2.4-mm welding wire’s melting edge to the bead and minimal Because of the broken bridge with each droplet, the cre-
depression of the weld pool for the C-type filler metal — Fig. 14B. ation of a continuous metal transfer bridge was difficult for
Figure 15 shows the metal transfer characteristics of the the welding wires and filler metal. At a lower DR, an elongated
welding wires and C-type filler metal at high and low DRs. bridge was discovered for the C-type filler metal. Although
At the high DR, the melting edge of the welding wires were both the welding wires and C-type filler metal deposited at
behind the electrode center and the unmelted welding wires the same rate (1 kg/h), the mode of metal transfer was dif-
stuck to the bead surface. In contrast, the melting edge of ferent. The inflow energy of the plasma stream and the filler

214-s | WELDING JOURNAL


A

Fig. 14 — A — Comparison of metal transfer modes between the ø2.4-mm welding wire and C-type filler metal at
a DR of 9 kg/h (I = 500 A, U = 60 cm/min); B — in-situ welding camera images of the filler metal’s melting edge
and molten bridge for the welding wires and C-type filler metal at a DR of 9 kg/h (I = 500 A, U = 60 cm/min).

Fig. 15 — Schematic diagram of the metal transfer mode in the circular welding wires and C-type filler metal.

SEPTEMBER 2023 | 215-s


metal current were greater in the C-type filler metal than in under the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE),
the welding wires. Consequently, the welding wires received South Korea, Grant No. 20004932.
an intermittent bridging transfer while the C-type filler metal
obtained a continuous bridging transfer. Also, at the high- References
current region, continuous bridging transfer was sustained in
1. Chen, J. S., Lu, Y., Li, X. R., and Zhang, Y. M. 2012. Gas tungsten arc
the C-type filler metal. Therefore, in the high-current region
welding using an arcing wire. Welding Journal 91(10): 261-s to 269-s.
of 500 A, where the DR was low at 5 kg/h, sound beads of
2. Meng, X., Qin, G., Bai, X., and Zou, Z. 2016. Humping phenomena
shallow depression were obtained. However, humping beads
in high-speed GTAW of different weld penetrations. Welding Journal
appeared in the welding wires due to the deep depression 95(9): 331-s to 339-s.
caused by the separation of the bridge.
3. Cho, S.-M., Oh, D.-S., Ham, H.-S., Ha, H.-J., Shin, H.-S., Jun, J.-H.,
Byun, J.-G., Park, J.-H., and Kwon, H.-Y. 2016. Filler metal for TIG
Conclusions welding. U.S. Patent US20160199947A1.
4. Cheepu, M., Baek, H. J., Kim, Y. S., and Cho, S. M. 2022. Pene-
tration estimation of GTAW with C-Type filler by net heat input ratio.
This study investigated the maximum DR and melting char-
Welding Journal 101(9): 240-s to 248-s. DOI: 10.29391/2022.101.018
acteristics using a ø1.2-mm welding wire (1.1 mm2), ø2.4-mm
5. Jun, J. H., Park, J. H., Cheepu, M., and Cho, S. M. 2020. Obser-
welding wire (4.5 mm2), and C-type filler metal (5.0 mm2) of
vation and analysis of metal transfer phenomena for high-current
Alloy 625 during GTAW. The welding method involved bead- super-TIG welding process. Science and Technology of Welding and
on-plate welds in a flat position using an industrial robot. The Joining 25(2): 106–111. DOI: 10.1080/13621718.2019.1637172
conclusions of this study are as follows: 6. Jun, J.-H., Kim, S.-R., and Cho, S.-M. 2016. A study on produc-
1) At the same welding current of 200 A, the maximum DR tivity improvement in narrow gap TIG welding. Journal of Welding
of the C-type filler metal was 1.4 times that of the ø1.2-mm and Joining 34(1): 68–74. DOI: 10.5781/JWJ.2016.34.1.68
welding wire and 1.17 times that of the ø2.4-mm welding wire. 7. Park, J.-H., Kim, Y.-H., Baek, H.-J., and Cho, S.-M. 2019. A study
At a welding current of 500 A, it was impossible for the ø1.2-mm on process development of super-TIG welding for 9% nickel steel
welding wire to deposit sound beads, and the acceptable DR with Alloy 625. Journal of Manufacturing Process 40: 140–148. DOI:
range for the ø2.4-mm welding wire was narrow (i.e., 7–8 kg/h). 10.1016/j.jmapro.2019.03.017
However, the acceptable DR range for the C-type filler metal was 8. Cheepu, M., Lee, C. I., and Cho, S. M. 2020. Microstructural
as broad as 5.04–12.1 kg/h. The maximum DR for the C-type characteristics of wire arc additive manufacturing with Inconel 625
filler metal was 1.51 times that of the ø2.4-mm welding wire. by super-TIG welding. Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals
73(6): 1475–1479. DOI: 10.1007/s12666-020-01915-x
2) The melting characteristics of the filler metals depended
9. Park, J. H., Park, S. Y., and Cho, S. M. 2019. A study on process
on the following: 1) the energy density of the plasma stream; 2)
development of deformation reduction in TIG overlay welding. Journal
the inflow angle of the plasma stream; and 3) the filler metal of Welding and Joining 37(1): 82–88. DOI: 10.5781/JWJ.2019.37.1.11
surface area of the plasma stream inflow. The plasma inflow
10. Yudodibroto, B. Y. B., Hermans, M. J. M., Hirata, Y., and den Ouden,
angle in the welding wires rapidly decreased from 90 to 0 deg G. 2004. Influence of filler wire addition on weld pool oscillation during
as the arc angle increased from the top center point to both gas tungsten arc welding. Science and Technology of Welding and
sides. However, in the C-type filler metal, the plasma inflow Joining 9(2): 163–168. DOI: 10.1179/136217104225012274
angle decreased slightly as the arc angle increased from the 11. ISO/TR 18491, Welding and allied processes — Guidelines for
bottom center point to both sides. Therefore, the amount measurement of welding energies. 2015. Geneva, Switzerland: Inter-
of plasma inflow to the C-type filler metal was much higher national Organization for Standardization.
than that to the welding wires. As a result, the maximum DR 12. DuPont, J. N., and Marder, A. R. 1995. Thermal efficiency of arc
was high for the same welding current. welding processes. Welding Journal 74(12): 406-s to 416-s.
3) At the same current of 200 A, the penetration depth was 13. Jenney, C. L., and O’Brien, A., eds. 2001. “Chapter 10 —
deepest in the ø1.2-mm welding wire followed by the ø2.4-mm Monitoring and Control of Welding and Joining Processes.” In Weld-
welding wire, and the C-type filler metal had the lowest pene- ing Handbook, Welding Science and Technology, Vol. 1, 9th Ed. Miami,
tration depth. At 500 A, the penetration depth of the C-type Fla.: American Welding Society.
filler metal was lower than the ø2.4-mm welding wire. This 14. DuPont, J. N., and Marder, A. R. 1996. Dilution in single pass arc
was because the filler metal current of the C-type filler metal welds. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B 27(3): 481–489.
was higher than the ø1.2- and ø2.4-mm welding wires. Also, 15. Shirali, A. A., and Mills, K. C. 1993. The effect of welding parameters
the weld pool current of the C-type filler metal was lower than on penetration in GTA welds. Welding Journal 72(7): 347-s to 353-s.
the ø1.2 and ø2.4-mm welding wires. 16. Oh, D.-S., Kim, Y.-S., and Cho, S.-M. 2005. Derivation of current
density distribution by arc pressure measurement in GTA welding.
4) In the high-current region of 500 A, where the DR was low
Science and Technology of Welding and Joining 10(4): 442–446.
at 5 kg/h, sound beads of shallow depression were obtained DOI: 10.1179/174329305X44116
in the C-type filler metal owing to the continuous bridging
transfer. However, humping beads appeared in the wires due MURALIMOHAN CHEEPU (muralicheepu@gmail.com), HYO
to the deep depression caused by the separation of the bridge. JIN BAEK, YOUNG SIK KIM, and SANG MYUNG CHO are
with STARWELDS Inc., Busan, Republic of Korea.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Korea Evaluation Insti-
tute of Industrial Technology (KEIT), Daegu, South Korea,

216-s | WELDING JOURNAL

You might also like