Decentralized Business Models-4oed1q 141767 1666249939

Decentralized
Business
Models
Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

SUPER GUIDE:
Decentralized
Business
Models
BY DANIEL PEREIRA

© THE BUSINESS MODEL ANALYST
The Business Model Analyst is a website dedicated to

analyzing business model types, patterns, and innovations
using the business model canvas as its primary tool. The
site oﬀers a wide variety of free and premium content,
including digital products such as PDF tools, presentations,
spreadsheets, ebooks & guides, and much more. Check it
out here.
Daniel Pereira
The Business Model
Analyst Ottawa, ON,
Canada
businessmodelanalyst.com

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 8
What Is Decentralization? 9
Benefits Of Decentralization 10
Quick Decision-Making 10
Executive Development 10
Development Of Managerial Skills 10
Relieves Top Management 11
Facilitates Growth 11
Better Control 11
Effective Communication 11
What Is Centralization? 12
Advantages Of Centralization 12
A Clear Chain Of Command 13
Focused Vision 13
Reduced Costs 14
Quick Implementation Of Decisions 14
Improved Quality Of Work 15
Disadvantages Of Centralization 15
Bureaucratic Leadership 16
Remote Control 16
Delays In Work 16
Lack Of Employee Loyalty 17
Centralization And Decentralization 18
History Of Decentralization In Business 20

Decentralized Business Model 23
Centralized Vs. Decentralized Business Models 24
Centralized Vs Decentralized Manufacturing 25
Centralized Manufacturing 25
Decentralized Manufacturing 26
Rise Of Decentralization 2.0 27
How Decentralization Is Creating New Business Models29
The Rise Of The Sharing Economy 29
Trust In A Decentralized Network 30
Tokens And Cryptocurrencies 31
Tokenizing The Transport Industry 32
Major Business Models In Decentralized Finance 35
Decentralized Currencies 35
Decentralized Payment Services 36
Decentralized Fundraising 37
Decentralized Contracting 39
Examples Of Decentralized Business 41

Johnson And Johnson 41
Eventbrite 42
How Decentralized Business Works 43
Decentralization And Blockchain 45

Centralized Vs. Decentralized Blockchain Business
Models 46
Decision-Making/Governance Processes 46
Revenue/ Financial Models 47
Data Storage/Social Media 48
Why Do We Need Blockchain Business Models? 49
Should You Move To A Decentralized Business Model? 51

What Causes The Failure Of Centralized Databases And
Data Management Systems? 52
Security 52
Reliability 52
Accessibility 52
Data Transfer Costs 52
Scalability 52
Benefits Of The Decentralized And Distributed Databases
53
What Potential Advantages Might A Decentralized
Business Have? 54
Societal Advantages Of Decentralized Models 54
Trust 54
Reliability And Sustainability 55
Censorship 55
Open Systems And Verified Owners 55
Decentralization As A Game-Changer 56
Self-Sovereign Identity 56
Human Centric-Solutions 56
Privacy By Design Model 57
Web 3.0 58
Challenges To Running A Decentralized Business 59
Do Startups And Established Businesses Benefit From

Decentralization? 60
How To Build A Decentralized Organization 62

Establish The Company Values 62
Include All Employees 63
Prioritize Training 63
Develop A Culture Of Teamwork 63
Encourage Growth 64

Conclusion 65
References 66
About The Author 69

INTRODUCTION
Due to its capacity to minimize transaction costs, foster trust
across distributed networks, and facilitate decentralized
platforms, blockchain technology has the potential to provide
a new foundation for decentralized business models. The
features of blockchain's distributed ledger are enabling the
development of new sorts of business models that are
decentralized, creative, interoperable, borderless, and
transparent. There's a possibility that decentralized business
models made feasible by blockchain technology may
enhance financial inclusion, open up access to information,
encourage permissionless innovation, and create new
opportunities for entrepreneurial and creative ideas.
Decentralized business models, a novel use of blockchain

technology, have the potential to transform the structure of
contemporary corporations and open up fresh opportunities
for innovation and entrepreneurship, while highlighting both
their benefits and drawbacks.

WHAT IS
DECENTRALIZATION?
Decentralization refers to a management style in which

power and authority are distributed around an organization
instead of being concentrated at the top. Middle and
lower-level employees are left to make day-to-day decisions
that affect them. This leaves company executives with more
time to devote to making important choices. In order to keep
operations running smoothly, many companies have come to
consider decentralization a necessity.
Management decentralization can be thought of as the

systematic allocation of authority among the different layers
of leadership that exist within a company. It outlines the
structure of an organization's decision-making power and
how that authority is divided throughout the various
departments and management levels of the business. The
term is used to describe the practice of devolving authority
and transferring responsibilities to many departments or
agencies.

Benefits of decentralization
Quick decision-making
By delegating decision-making power to the operational
level, decisions that are most directly relevant to the
operation may be made in a way that is both more
expeditious and productive.
Executive development
The act of delegating responsibility to lower levels compels
those persons to rely on their own judgment, which in turn
promotes a feeling of independence and self-assurance in
the employees. Because of the high degree of delegation,
the executives are kept on their toes, and they are required
to constantly problem-solve in order to ensure that the
organization continues to function effectively.
Development of managerial skills

A decentralized organizational structure allows for lower-level
workers to be given greater responsibility and autonomy,
which is one of the many advantages of having such a
system. When individuals who have shown their value are

promoted, a pool of qualified workers is created. These
workers may then be allocated to more demanding tasks,
which assist in developing growth and accountability.
Relieves top management

It decreases the need for the superior to keep a close check
on their subordinates by providing those subordinates with
greater autonomy to make choices and take action within
certain parameters. This allows the superior to spend less
time monitoring their subordinates. Because of this,
upper-level management now has more time at their disposal
with which to make strategic decisions.
Facilitates growth
It provides managers at lower levels with greater leeway to
choose how to get things done within their own departments
or divisions in the most effective manner possible. It
encourages every department to compete with one another
to achieve the highest level of success in the organization.
Because of this, productivity rises, which will lead to
increased profitability for the company.
Better control
It allows each employee tier's performance to be tracked,
further ensuring that each division's output is scrutinized
independently. A measurement of how well the corporation
as a whole performs and how significantly each division
contributes can then be made.
Effective communication
The organization's communication system will improve as a
result of decentralization. In addition to this, it helps to
strengthen the relationship between superiors and
subordinates. Decentralization is beneficial to certain
executives at the middle and lower levels because it gives
them the experience of working in the real world and boosts
their morale.

WHAT IS
CENTRALIZATION?
When the responsibility for planning and decision-making

within an organization is given to a single person or a single
location, these functions are referred to as being
"centralized.". The power of a centralized organization lies
only with the organization's headquarters; all of the subsidiary
branches take their cues from the headquarters. The
company's CEOs and other professionals who make
important decisions are based at the headquarters.
To a similar extent, under a centralized government structure,

all decisions are taken at the highest possible level, and all
lower levels are tasked with doing nothing more than carrying
out the instructions given by that level.
Because of their limited resources and workforce, small

businesses need to centralize their management.
Advantages of Centralization
Some businesses have chosen to centralize their
organizational structure in order to take advantage of the
following benefits.

A clear chain of command
When personnel in a centralized company are aware of
precisely who they should be reporting to, they are capable
of carrying out their jobs more effectively. When questions or
issues arise, staff members at all levels are aware of whom to
contact for assistance.
Executives adopt a clear strategy that consists of delegating

authority to staff members that thrive in certain areas of
expertise. When they delegate work to lower-level managers
and personnel, they have the assurance that there will not be
any unnecessary duplication of work and effort. It is useful to
have a clear chain of command in situations when decisions
need to be executed quickly and in a manner that is
coherent.
Focused vision
The capacity of a business to accomplish its goals and
achieve its vision is significantly aided by the use of a
management structure that is centralized. The top executive
has the capacity to communicate the vision of the firm to the
personnel effectively and guide them in the right direction.

Due to the absence of centralized management, there will be
discrepancies in the way in which messages are
communicated to employees since there are no clear lines of
authority. If the senior leadership of an organization is
responsible for directing the organization's vision, then the
organization's goals and plans will be carried out without any
hitches. Everyone who is important to the organization,
including customers, vendors, and communities, is informed
of the same thing.
Reduced costs
A centralized organization follows defined principles and
procedures that regulate the corporation, saving money on
office and management overhead. Because the most
essential decision-makers are situated at the company's main
office, the headquarters, and other branches do not need
extra departments and equipment.
Because key decisions are made at a centralized location and

are then communicated to the branches, the firm does not
need to employ the services of specialists at the branches
themselves, which results in cost savings. The clear
delineation of the chain of command helps reduce the
amount of needless duplication of effort, which in turn helps
save expenses.
Quick implementation of decisions

Centralized organizations have a small group of persons who
are responsible for making decisions and communicating
those decisions to the rest of the management. As a result of
this, choices may be reached more rapidly since there are
just a few people engaged, and they are able to discuss all of
the nuances of problems at a single meeting.
After the decisions have been taken, they are communicated

to other divisions of the firm so that they may be
implemented. If both middle and lower management are

involved in the decision-making process, it will not only take
more time, but will also lead to more conflicts. There is a
possibility that certain managers may disagree with the
decisions, which would make the process of implementation
more drawn out and difficult.
Improved quality of work

A centralized organization has the advantage of strict
guidelines and increased levels of oversight, both of which
contribute to better work quality. A manager is assigned to
each division to ensure that the job is carried out consistently
and to continuously maintain a high level of quality.
Disadvantages of
Centralization
There are many different kinds of corporate organizations,
and centralization is not appropriate for all of them. This is
due to the fact that centralization carries with it a number of
intrinsic drawbacks, which are listed below.

Bureaucratic leadership
Because employees under centralized management are
completely accountable for accomplishing the duties that are
allocated to them by the company's senior management, this
kind of management is somewhat comparable to a totalitarian
approach to leadership. Employees are not allowed to
participate in the decision-making process of the business,
and are instead implementers of top-down directives.
Because they are only accountable for making decisions and

not carrying them out, executives will not understand when
employees struggle to put those decisions into effect.
Workers lose interest in carrying out the dictates of
upper-level supervisors since those supervisors did not care
to obtain their opinion, and as a result, performance will
suffer.
Remote control
Executives are always tasked with making important
decisions for their companies, but they have very little say in
how those decisions are carried out. When they fail to
delegate responsibility appropriately, they end up with extra
duties.
Executives do not have enough time to adequately supervise

the implementation of their decisions. As a result, workers are
more likely to be unwilling to take part. As a consequence of
this, chief executive officers run the danger of making lots of
decisions that are either carried out improperly or ignored by
workers.
Delays in work
Productivity suffers if everything needs to be sent to and from
a single central location. The members of the staff are reliant
on management for updates, and any lag in the delivery of
this update leads to a waste of both staff members' time and
effort. When employees are made to wait too long between

tasks without being given any guidance, their productivity
decreases.
Lack of employee loyalty

When employees are given more responsibility at work, they
tend to have a greater investment in the success of the
organization as a whole. They could come up with novel
concepts and suggest other, more effective approaches to
completing tasks. However, in a workplace that is highly
centralized, people have very limited opportunities to take
the initiative since they are obligated to implement the ideas
of higher-level management. Their commitment and loyalty to
the organization suffer as a result of the monotony of their
work, which also inhibits their capacity to think creatively and
logically outside of the box.

CENTRALIZATION AND
DECENTRALIZATION
To better understand centralization and decentralization,

examine the following:
● Centralization refers to the practice of bestowing most

of the decision-making and power in an organization
to members of top management. On the other hand,
decentralization, which refers to the process of
handing down decision-making power to more junior
levels of management, has the exact opposite effect.
● The act of concentrating authority on a small number

of people or organizations is referred to as
centralization. However, decentralization refers to the
intentional distribution of authority among many
locations within an organization. When it comes to
efficiency, centralized management is better for a
small business, whereas decentralized management is
preferable for a huge corporation.
● Formal lines of communication may be formed in a

system that is organized in a hierarchical fashion.
However, decentralization results in information being
dispersed in a variety of different places.
● Under a centralized system, the amount of time it

takes to make decisions is increased because all
bodies are reliant on the judgments made by a single
authority. It has been proven, however, that
decentralization is more effective when decisions are

taken in close proximity to the place where they will be
carried out.
● When activities are coordinated via a centralized

organization, there is only a single point of contact and
one set of directions to follow. Decentralization results
in the distribution of leadership tasks among a wider
group of people.

HISTORY OF
DECENTRALIZATION IN
BUSINESS
To the best of our knowledge, the year 2020 will mark the
pivotal turning point that fundamentally alters the trajectory of
the commercial world. The year 1920, which was yet another
year marked by political upheaval and economic stagnation,
was not an exception. Around the turn of the century, the
beginning of a long period of economic prosperity in the
United States sparked the emergence of enormous,
nationally-based firms that significantly depended on foreign
capital and took advantage of their size to increase efficiency.
These corporations were able to do so because of the

sustained period of economic expansion that began at the
turn of the century. There was a considerable amount of time
spent wondering whether these firms were doing anything
wrong legally or not.
The United States Steel Corporation v. the United States of

America was before the Supreme Court in 1920, and the
court ruled that large businesses do not have to be broken
up as long as they do not restrict competition. However, as
soon as one barrier was overcome, another developed in the
form of gigantic corporations that grew to be unmanageable
in their current state, given the challenging economic
environment.

Consider the history of DuPont as an example. Its workforce
increased from 5,300 in 1914 to 85,000 in 1918, and its market
capitalization increased from $86 million to $310 million
during the same time period. DuPont is currently a significant
manufacturer of chemicals, dyes, paints, and synthetic
textiles, but it got its start in the explosives sector. The
organizational structure of the company has remained
substantially unaltered despite the growing complexity of the
company's operations. It became increasingly challenging to
properly operate all of its operations at the same time.
Pierre du Pont has in the past developed intricate ways of

reporting and accounting in order to more precisely identify
the cause of the problems. In 1920, he began formulating the
framework for his decentralized administrative system. It was
the intention of top-level management to stop
micromanaging day-to-day operations and instead direct their
attention to long-term strategic planning.
Instead, DuPont's data would be used to monitor the

company's overall performance, and strategic objectives
would be developed with the help of the information that was
being gathered. In addition, the plan called for the
development of a number of administrative divisions, each of
which would be responsible for the acquisition, production,
and distribution of a certain line of products.
The fact that General Motors, and not DuPont, was the
company that pioneered the implementation of the plan is
only a coincidental occurrence. The arms manufacturer was
flush with cash at the beginning of the 20th century, and it
found an appropriate home for a significant portion of its
assets in the vehicle company that had been formed by
William Durant in the 1910s.
Over the course of his career, Durant amalgamated many

competing automakers and even some manufacturers of

consumer products under the General Motors umbrella. The
Durant cluster was already in a vulnerable situation by the
time the economic crisis that happened in the middle of the
1920s began. After Durant was fired in the fall of that year,
Pierre du Pont took over the company and, with the
assistance of Alfred Sloane, a wonderful manager whom
Durant had neglected, began the process of developing a
decentralized management structure. Even though it took
almost three years for decentralization to gain traction, in the
end, it was beneficial for General Motors and helped them
surpass Ford.
Although not all companies are able to reap the benefits of

decentralization, in the decades that followed, almost every
diverse and the capital-intensive organization began
implementing it. This was accomplished by DuPont in 1921,
Westinghouse in 1934, International Harvester in 1943, and
General Electric in 1950. The significance of this pivotal
moment in the history of corporations may be felt even in the
present day, despite the fact that developments in markets,
technology, and legislation would eventually expose the
shortcomings of decentralized administration.

DECENTRALIZED
BUSINESS MODEL
This refers to the practice in business wherein upper-level

management hands over responsibility for day-to-day
operations and decision-making to their subordinates at the
managerial and team levels. When an organization is
decentralized, its senior executives have more time and
resources at their disposal to dedicate to strategic initiatives
and crucial decisions.
Extreme types of decentralization increase the number of

people who may participate in decision-making, while more
conventional types often continue to utilize restrictive
frameworks that include checks and balances. Delegating
authority and responsibility to those who are best suited to
make decisions because they are in more frequent touch with
stakeholders and have access to more current information is
the core tenet of a decentralized business model.
For instance, a banker who often handles client orders for

debit cards is likely to be the first to identify difficulties with
the cards, even before higher-ranking members of
management become aware of the issue. If a customer is
having issues with their debit card, they do not have to be
pushed to higher-level management; rather, they may get
quick assistance using the tools and information that are
readily available to middle-level and lower-level
management.

Centralized vs. Decentralized
Business Models
Organizational and business structures with centralized
administration have been the norm for a very long time. The
adoption of decentralized versions, however, has lagged
behind and has only recently started to be adopted due to
the advancement of technology and the ease of
dissemination of information.
Decision-making and the dissemination of those decisions

across enterprises is where the two models deviate
substantially from one another. Both the methods for storing
and disseminating information as well as the ways in which
revenue is generated need to be completely reformed.
Decentralized organizations and the underlying principles

that underpin blockchain technology are not ground-breaking
innovations. The prevalence of the use of decentralization is
growing because of both of these factors. First,

decentralization is becoming more and more necessary.
Second, technological improvements have led to the creation
of infrastructure that can support it.
Centralized vs Decentralized
Manufacturing
Centralized Manufacturing
Taking advantage of economies of scale and producing a
large number of goods with the same equipment may help a
single centralized factory significantly reduce the amount of
money spent on manufacturing each individual unit.
According to a study that was carried out by APQC (American

Productivity & Quality Center), the costs of production
incurred by centralized companies are around 3% lower than
those incurred by decentralized firms. That amounts to a loss
of $60 million for the year for a business that brings in $2
billion annually. According to the results of APQC, centralized
manufacturing is associated with higher raw material
inventory turn rates (rate of use and replacement cycle for
raw materials) as well as more efficient production schedules.
Some of the extra advantages that may come from

centralizing manufacturing are improved projections, more
local employment, consistent output, and effective use of
limited resources. Additionally, there is a possibility that the
prices of the raw materials will go down if a central
manufacturing facility is located in close proximity to a source
of raw materials for those commodities.
However, because of the significant cost involved in

customizing products, centralized manufacturing tends to be
fairly rigid. In the event that a product has to be modified, for

example, the whole system will need to be reconfigured,
which is a process that is both time-consuming and costly.
Also, if a company decides to maintain its principal facility in a
country or region where wages are increasing, this might
result in high labor expenses for the company.
Decentralized Manufacturing
Manufacturing facilities that are decentralized over a wide
area provide a variety of benefits when compared with those
that are concentrated in a central location. This includes the
opportunity to take advantage of closer proximity to the
company's customer base, in addition to other benefits, such
as higher employee and manager morale, greater
adaptability, faster access to information in real-time, higher
quality data, and lower labor costs in a number of different
regions.
Being located close to one's clients makes it easier to adjust

one's services to meet the ever-evolving needs of the market.
When you have more decentralized production facilities, the
experience you offer customers will become more tailored to
their preferences. With decentralized manufacturing, a
company is able to zero in on the manufacturing of those
products that are most successful in a particular region.
Being flexible brings with it a host of extra advantages. For

example, in a centralized corporate office, if two workers
need to speak with one another, they will have to go through
a series of channels. However, decentralization makes it
possible for this communication to take place more quickly.
Not only are employees more engaged in making choices

under a decentralized production model, but they also have
the ability to correct problems as they emerge without having
to wait for authorization from higher-ups in the organization.
According to research conducted at Harvard University,
decentralized production increases employee engagement

and creativity levels by giving lower-level managers higher
levels of responsibility. When lower-level management feels a
sense of ownership over the company, it rubs off on the
workers in both the production and support divisions,
elevating worker performance across the board.
A company can choose to decentralize its operations in order

to improve the quality of service it provides to its clientele as
it expands into new markets. For example, American
Nutrition, a major pet food company, started out with a single
facility in Utah but has since expanded to four facilities in
Arizona, Washington, and Pennsylvania, in order to meet the
demand of the market.
Decentralized manufacturing, although offering a number of

advantages, is not without its share of problems. The initial
investment required to establish multiple sites is greater than
that required to establish a single, centralized facility for
production. Additionally, the cost per unit is greater than that
required for mass-produced goods manufactured in a single
facility, and it is more difficult to ensure uniformity in practices
and products across the entire business. Also, businesses
that make highly specialized goods for local distribution may
find that decentralized manufacturing is not the optimal
choice for their operations.
Rise of Decentralization 2.0

Users have lost faith in both the system and each other due
to the inadequacies of centralized peer-to-peer (P2P)
networks. However, if contemporary technology is shown to
be reliable and risk-free, people may once again put their
confidence in decentralized systems. The new approaches,
which help to make interaction on a local level easier, are
aiding in the development of a society that values equitable
treatment of its members and respect for one another.

A P2P service known as Arcade City was established by a
group of Austin, Texas, residents on Facebook when the city
of Austin placed restrictions on the operations of Uber.
Blockchain technology is used by the service's drivers to
organize themselves into groups that can more effectively
recommend consumers to one another and collaborate.
LoveHomeSwap and Knock are just two of the numerous new

peer-to-peer (P2P) home exchange services that have
emerged throughout the globe in recent years to compete
with Airbnb. Many people are turning to companies such as
HomeExchange in order to swap houses with other people
who will be in their city at the same time as they will be gone.
This allows them to reduce the amount of money they spend
on accommodation.
We are really on the cusp of full decentralization. Soon, this

will be common practice in many different industries,
including government bureaucracy, the financial sector, the
real estate industry, the insurance sector, the transportation
sector, and other industries, and blockchain technology will
be largely responsible for making this possible.
It is not the objective of this move to decentralization to do

away with centralized structures; rather, it is to create new
links between those that already exist. Decentralization 2.0 is
beneficial for all parties involved, since it preserves the
advantages of conventional platforms while simultaneously
lowering dependency on intermediaries.
If the major objective of your firm is to facilitate

communication and interaction between people, you may
want to think about making use of decentralized services.
Because there is a growing need for decentralization in
today's society, startups that are based on these platforms
will be able to compete successfully with companies such as

Uber and Airbnb.
How decentralization is
creating new business models
The rise of the sharing economy
The so-called "sharing economy", which includes companies
such as Airbnb, Uber, and others, has been the subject of a
great deal of debate and literature in recent years. But over
time, pessimism about the potential for these new businesses
to disrupt established industries has been steadily
supplanted by worries about appalling labor practices and
monopolies.
Airbnb, for example, has enabled individuals all over the

world to rent out their spare rooms or perhaps even their
entire home. It's difficult to remember a period before Airbnb,
but without them, individuals couldn't compete in the
enormous vacation rental sector without paying a lot of
money for customer awareness to a middleman.
Through the use of the internet and mobile devices, such as

smartphones, it is now possible for anybody to rent out a
spare room or apartment in their home to tourists from all
over the world, with Airbnb taking a cut of the revenue.
The fact that the Airbnb business suffers from a number of

disadvantages should come as no surprise to anybody. The
proprietors of hotels in cities like Berlin, as well as residents
of such cities, have raised their voices in protest against the
threat that is posed to their businesses and the harm that is
caused to the ecosystem in those areas. Sadly, the centrally
controlled quasi-sharing business models like Airbnb and
Uber have a significant fault, which is that they have an

excessive amount of influence over the online identities of
customers.
When it comes to running online businesses, the most

precious asset we have at our disposal is our social capital.
However, if your reputation is under the control of a company
whose priorities might not coincide with yours, it might be
difficult to ensure that it accurately reflects the services you
provide and that you are adequately compensated for those
services as well as the implicit social capital you have built up.
Trust in a decentralized network

In its most basic form, a decentralized network enables
participation from any location in the world by requiring each
participant to have their own copy of the transaction ledger.
In essence, authorization is not necessary in any way. This
concept is absolutely ideal for public blockchains such as
Bitcoin and Ethereum. The code is available for download by
anybody who has access to the internet, and the widespread
diffusion of this authoritative source makes it extremely
challenging for malicious actors to change the information
contained in the distributed ledger.
Even if the ledger records financial transactions between

individuals or between organizations, or if the records on the
blockchain are rather abstract, such as the record of a day's
weather, this concept of universal ease of access and
openness is at the root of this new trustless economy.
Every day, we place our confidence in the abilities of other

people to assist us in navigating many facets of our lives. We
trust that other drivers will drive their vehicles responsibly
and that our physicians will be capable of providing us with
good medical care. But the growing population of the world
has brought up a severe problem with this dependency on
trustworthy relationships between people. Nowadays, we do
not do business with one another in person; rather, we often

have to engage in some form of transaction with any one of
the seven billion other people on earth.
The groundbreaking White Paper for Bitcoin, which was

released in the latter part of 2008, explained a process for
transferring cash without each side being required to prove
the identity of the other. It also demonstrated that individuals
may be motivated to work together for the common good via
the use of mathematics, even in the absence of any kind of
government or centralized supervision.
There is no centralized authority that presides over the

Bitcoin network that dictates how many validating machines
should be online at any given time or which businesses
should invest in additional hardware or cloud services in
order to take part in the network. Rather, the volatile price of
Bitcoin coupled with the difficulty level will decide the
incentive that network members will earn for confirming
transactions and making sure that multiple copies of the
ledger exist, therefore safeguarding it for all users. The effort
put in by each member of the network will determine their
share of this reward. This will ensure that everyone in the
network is compensated fairly for their efforts.
Since its inception in 2009, Bitcoin has been put to use as a

comprehensive research platform to demonstrate the viability
of a globally integrated, decentralized network that is based
exclusively on the principles of economics and mathematics.
Tokens and cryptocurrencies

As a result of the widespread adoption of Bitcoin, it became
apparent that cryptographic tokens might be used to convey
more than just monetary value between individuals. Take into
consideration the fact that, similar to Bitcoin, these blockchain
tokens may be sold but cannot be duplicated; a single person
can only hold ownership of each or a fraction of them at any
one point. The rapid price rises that have been seen while

trading tokens like Ethereum have garnered a lot of attention
from the media, but this is really one of the least exciting
elements of these currencies.
Some blockchains offer tokens that are digital versions of real

things, like gold or shares in a company. However, the
blockchains that offer utility tokens may be the ones that
usher in a new era.
The question now is, what exactly are we going to

accomplish with these tokens? This simply means that the
token may be traded for a single instance of the given
service. This is equivalent to the cost of obtaining AWS API
keys. In any event, if you have an Amazon Web Services
(AWS) account, you have access to Amazon's cloud
computing capabilities; hence, the analogy is not wholly
wrong. You are responsible for safeguarding your secret key
to prevent unauthorized users from accessing your invoiced
services.
Your tokens are much like the AWS API key: If someone else
has access to your private key for your wallet, they can use it
to access and spend the tokens you paid for.
Tokenizing the transport industry

Similarly, the mobility industry, which includes public
transportation, private vehicles, and bicycles, is ripe for
tokenization.
In the early days of the railroad business, there was no such

thing as a standard measurement for the rails that were used
on railroads. The various rail firms used widths that were
different from one another, which made it impossible for their
trains to be compatible with one another. As may be seen in
the United Kingdom, the variety of train services makes it
difficult to purchase tickets and synchronize schedules.

Picture having a single currency that could be used for all
modes of transportation, whether public or private. Giving up
your vehicle's satellite tracking data may earn you credits that
may be redeemed for a bus or train journey. You may get
rewarded for using a bicycle for a short distance or giving a
stranger a ride in your vehicle. No one can tell you how to
utilize that credit. After riding your bike and carpooling about
town all week, you may opt to spend part of your tokens to
pay for a toll road.
Various forms of transportation were used by the same

individual at different times in the aforementioned scenarios.
This exemplifies the shift in mobility that has taken place
during the last fifty years. The days of the typical
developed-world family having one or two automobiles and
using them exclusively for transportation are over.
The transportation landscape has changed significantly

during the 1990s, thanks to a combination of factors,
including a growing urban population and a tendency among
millennials (a consequence of expensive housing) to put off
buying a home or car. There are currently fewer licensed
drivers in Great Britain than there were ten years ago, despite
a rise in the total number of cars on the road. National Travel
Survey data shows that the number of males getting their
licenses has dropped precipitously between the ages of 17
and 29. The ways in which millennials travel are more varied
than those of earlier generations.
A person who resides in a city may use many transportation

systems over the course of a week or even a single day, and
each of these activities may be traced back to the individual
using the data that the individual generates. The number of
individuals using car-sharing services such as DriveNow and
Car2Go is rapidly increasing. Consider a young person who
lives in a big European metropolis like London or Berlin.
When the weather is nice, they could take the bus or ride

their bikes to work, and they might enroll in a carpooling
scheme to guarantee that they always have access to a
vehicle for carrying heavy items or taking weekend trips.
Instead of driving themselves home late at night or after
consuming alcohol, our young person here can hire a cab or
employ a ridesharing service such as Uber or Lyft.
The collection of data pertaining to mobility encompasses

more than just automobiles. The Internet of Things (IoT),
mobile phones, and existent databases maintained by data
providers are all additional sources of data generation.
Alternatively, a health insurance company may take into
consideration a policyholder's annual cycling or walking miles
as a measure of their dedication to leading a healthy lifestyle
and a method of maintaining lower premiums.
Therefore, a token such as DOVU's mobility-specific DOV

currency might be used in several contexts and by both
transport companies and passengers, facilitating a true
circular economy.
The DOV token, for example, is critical in their system. It is the

medium of exchange that will enable the development of a
new economic model that will encourage data sharing while
linking consumers and data suppliers. To assist their
ecosystem flourish in the transportation business, they
encourage the use of the DOV token inside it, which
increases the token's utility and, as a result, its value to
customers.
Imagine a future in which:
● Payments in tokens might be made to the owners of

existing datasets to encourage them to release their
data for public use;
● Car owners have the option of having their vehicle's

navigation system share data about the current state
of the road so that it may be used to improve safety for
other motorists;
● Certain vehicle owners might be incentivized to take a

break from driving on certain days of the week by
using location data;
● Insurers will be able to make more informed

judgments, resulting in lower travel costs for
conscientious consumers;
● Analyzing geolocation data from vehicles, bicycles,

pedestrians, and public transportation buses might
help city authorities make better infrastructure
decisions;
● Travel expenses may be more precisely controlled by

transportation providers, making it cheaper to utilize
their infrastructure when demand is low.
Major Business Models in

Decentralized Finance
The use of blockchain technology on a large scale has the
potential to open the door to the establishment of whole new
categories of businesses. It also has the potential to
decentralize the financial industry, foster innovation, and
enable access to services for a larger number of people.
Some of these new opportunities are outlined below.
Decentralized currencies
Since the dawn of time, sovereign countries have each
maintained their own kind of fiat currency. Up until recently,
central institutions were entrusted with the job of maintaining
gold reserves, which were used as a foundation for many

currencies. In contrast, gold no longer acts as a backing for
fiat currencies as in recent years. The value of a country's fiat
currency is determined only by the degree to which investors
have confidence in that nation's economy, government, and
central bank.
Bitcoin was the first currency that was produced not by a

government, but rather by a decentralized digital network.
Bitcoin's supply is limited and cannot be unilaterally raised or
reduced, unlike the amount of fiat currency that is generated
by central banks. This causes bitcoin to have a deflationary
effect. Thanks to the fact that it is a decentralized digital
asset, Bitcoin has risen to become the most widely used
cryptocurrency as well as the "digital gold" of the blockchain
space.
Much like gold, bitcoin is not restricted in how it may be used

and can be transferred from one person to another without
relying on a bank or any other centralized agency to mediate
the transaction. In addition to Bitcoin, there are many more
decentralized cryptocurrencies available, including Ethereum,
Monero, Dash, and Cardano. These are just a handful of the
major ones.
Decentralized payment services

Centralized payment networks such as Visa, PayPal, and
SWIFT make it possible to carry out transactions both online
and in person, but they might charge high fees sometimes,
especially for international money transfers. In spite of the
fact that the internet has led to a significant reduction in the
cost of many different services, the cost of processing
payments still remains relatively high.
Libra and the Bitcoin Lightning Network are two examples of

decentralized payment networks that aim to solve the issues
with conventional payment systems by providing cheap,
quick, and worldwide payments. For example, the Bitcoin

Lightning Network facilitates quick, secure, and irreversible
monetary transactions for a nominal cost. Because of the
service's cheap transaction fees, businesses may save
expenses and increase profits. Additionally, businesses that
are underserved by current payment systems can now take
advantage of these low-cost payment options.
Further, if transactions can be made for zero or almost zero

cost, this might open the door to new business models (like
micropayments) that would not have been conceivable
before. Perhaps most surprisingly, the centralized platform
Square intends to add Bitcoin Lightning Network support to
its payment systems in the near future.
Due to the decentralized nature of blockchain and

cryptocurrencies, international payments may be processed
quickly and cheaply. To facilitate faster and cheaper
international money transfers, Ripple, for example, has
partnered with a number of different banks and payment
processors.
Decentralized fundraising
Traditional venture financing may be difficult to get funding
for since investors are likely to place their trust and financial
resources exclusively in businesses that have established
strong network ties.
Because of blockchain technology, the fundraising business

is going through a period of profound transformation. Initial
coin offerings (often known as ICOs) are a prevalent
approach that may be used to generate cash in a
decentralized manner. An initial coin offering (ICO) is a
method of raising money for a project's early development
that entails generating a token for the project on a public
blockchain and selling it to investors. In recent times, initial
coin offerings (ICOs) have emerged as a revolutionary
method of funding for start-up enterprises. This method

enables company owners and innovators to collect billions of
dollars from investors from all over the world.
An initial coin offering is a promising strategy for establishing

network effects and raising funds for a business enterprise.
This innovative form of fundraising has the potential to entice
investors from all around the globe due to the transparency
of the underlying blockchain technology, as well as smart
contracts and open source code. It is likely that decentralized
fundraising, which makes use of the distributed trust that is
made possible by blockchains, will make it easier to raise
funds, will enhance access to financing, and will drive the
formation of new businesses and innovations.
In addition, an initial coin offering presents a unique means

through which projects may enlist the support of relevant
stakeholders to get the ball rolling on the establishment of a
new ecosystem. When a token can be utilized in the project's
commodities or platforms, the value of the initial coin offering
may grow as a result. These kinds of tokens are often
referred to as utility tokens.
Depending on the nature of the project, certain tokens might

be produced that reflect direct ownership or claims on cash
flows. Recently, a brand-new form that has been given the
name "initial exchange offering" (IEO) has come into
existence. In contrast to initial coin offerings (ICOs), initial
exchange offerings (IEOs) make use of cryptocurrency
exchanges in order to confirm the legality of projects and
connect investors with viable companies. During initial
exchange offerings (IEOs), cryptocurrency exchanges often
do comprehensive due research on new projects, publish
in-depth information on projects that seem viable, and lend
their reputation to efforts that are of high quality.

Decentralized contracting
To effectively collaborate and do business with one another, it
is essential for every company, market, or individual to be
bound by a legally enforceable agreement that they must
comply with. However, because of the amount of time and
resources that are required for negotiating, drafting,
enforcing, and amending agreements, it may be challenging
to manage contracts. The risks of moral hazard and adverse
selection hazard, in particular, may make financial contracting
more difficult than it needs to be by driving up transaction
costs and decreasing the number of available transaction
options.
Trading parties have traditionally placed a high level of

reliance on financial intermediaries because of their ability to
promote trust and reduce transaction costs. The process of
entering into financial contracts has become much simpler
over the last few years due to the emergence of blockchain
technology. This has made it possible for smart contracts to
take the place of financial intermediaries and contributed to
the expansion of peer-to-peer financial contracting.
The term "smart contract" is used to describe a certain kind of

digital contract that is stored on a blockchain and is
automatically carried out when specified conditions are
satisfied.
A smart contract's transparency, immutability, automation, and

programmability make it an appealing instrument for
streamlining and cheapening the process of coming to
contractual agreements. Contracting on contingencies is
likely to become less complicated as a result of the
"tamper-proof and automated feature" of programmable
decentralized consensus. The scope of what may be
contracted is expanded, related costs are reduced, and the
process of producing new discoveries and doing business is
sped up thanks to the use of smart contracts.

Decentralized platforms like MakerDAO, Compound, and
Dharma expedite the process of borrowing and lending
money by employing smart contracts. This results in a
reduction in the amount of time spent as well as fees and
paperwork.

EXAMPLES OF
DECENTRALIZED
BUSINESS
Johnson and Johnson

In addition to the consumer items it produces, such as baby
oil and bandages, Johnson & Johnson is also active in the
pharmaceutical, diagnostic, and medical device sectors.
Johnson & Johnson is well-known for being a globally

decentralized organization. The company has over 130,000
employees located in more than 100 different countries. The
choice made by Johnson & Johnson to delegate leadership

of the corporation to local management was influenced by a
number of reasons, including the following:
● Their knowledge of the customer is superior;
● They have a good understanding of the people with

whom they work closely;
● They are aware of the needs of both the state and the
market;
● The failure of these individuals will not bring the whole

firm to its knees.
Johnson & Johnson is cognizant of the fact that management

in the United States would have a difficult time supervising
operations in other countries, since they do not have
sufficient knowledge of the markets in other countries.
Eventbrite
Eventbrite is a website that allows users to search for events,
organize various events, and promote those events.
The business operates on a decentralized structure, which

allows event organizers to double as management because:
● Event organizers also serve as the event's promoters;
● Event organizers are more knowledgeable than

Eventbrite on how to engage potential ticket
purchasers;
● Given that Eventbrite has development offices all over

the world, the firm believes it is best to have regional
managers in charge since these individuals are more
acquainted with the area and its customers.

HOW DECENTRALIZED
BUSINESS WORKS
The degree to which various organizational systems are

decentralized is unclear and may vary significantly from one
another. This difficulty of being completely centralized or
decentralized is becoming increasingly apparent as an
increasing number of organizations adopt practices such as
flexible hours, remote working, and fluid management
techniques.
The amount of decentralization that is best for a company

depends on a number of factors, including its size, culture,
and business plan. Businesses that operate under the
franchise model, for instance, mix centralized and
decentralized management approaches. While higher-ups
have a role in matters such as the creation of products and
marketing strategies, owners have a bigger influence in hiring
employees and managing their shops.
Unlike franchises, where both the franchisor and the

franchisee share some of the risks, retail chains are far less
likely to decentralize their operations.
Some MNCs (multinational corporations) are structured in a

manner that lends them more of the characteristics of
decentralized businesses than those of centralized ones
when it comes to how they operate. These companies have
several different departments, all of which operate
independently of each other. Due to the fact that they are so
embedded in the typical centralized structure, it is difficult to

impose a more radical degree of decentralization on a larger
scale.
Because it empowers employees to pursue activities that

they are genuinely enthusiastic about, decentralization may
prove to be quite advantageous to medium-sized
organizations. However, as the company grows, it will need to
make adjustments in order to maintain operational efficiency
and consistency with corporate objectives. Even while a
startup may not yet be big enough to support a decentralized
organizational structure, it is still advisable to examine the
possibilities and make preparations for them in case they
materialize in the future.
A decentralized structure, similar to the open office layout of

some tech startups, may ignite a blaze of inventiveness and
individual responsibility among the members of your crew.

DECENTRALIZATION AND
BLOCKCHAIN
Consider the case of a company that maintains the privacy of

its clients' sensitive information on a centralized network of
ten thousand servers. Because this company controls the
warehouse in which these computers are stored, it has full
power over the systems as well as the information that is held
on them.
The design does, however, have one single point of potential

failure. What would take place if the location suddenly lost
power? Imagine for a moment if it was suddenly unable to
connect to the internet. What actions would you take in the
event that it caught fire? To make matters much worse, what if
a malevolent actor could just destroy everything with a few
keystrokes? Any of these circumstances will lead to the loss
or distortion of that information.
The primary goal of a blockchain is to decentralize the

information contained inside a database so that it can be
retrieved from several nodes in the system. This not only
improves the amount of data that is accessible, but it also
protects the integrity of the information by ensuring that even
if an attacker were to infiltrate one database node, they
would be unable to compromise the data that is stored on the
other nodes.
For instance, if someone attempts to manipulate the

information in the distributed ledger used by Bitcoin, it is
simple to determine which node in the network contains the

incorrect data. Using this strategy helps to build a clear and
accurate chronology of occurrences. The data that is stored
in the network can never be altered by a single node thanks
to this protection mechanism.
This ensures that the data and history, which includes a

record of all bitcoin transactions, will never be lost. The
transactions of a cryptocurrency are one type of data that
may be recorded in a blockchain. However, the technology
can also be used to record other types of data, such as
contracts, government IDs, or even a company's assets and
product inventory records.
Centralized vs. Decentralized

Blockchain Business Models
Decision-Making/Governance Processes
Companies almost never base their decisions on a vote that
receives a majority of the general public's support; rather,
they adhere to a stringent chain of command. Companies like

Apple and Google adhere to preset rules whenever they
make decisions about the approval of new mobile
applications, for instance. Because of the way these
companies are structured, only a small number of powerful
corporate figures have the ability to make this choice, or at
the very least, to set the policies and procedures that are
required to effectively run the business. Their business
models have a strong emphasis on centralization.
Another illustration of this would be the discretion a bank has

in determining the daily withdrawal limits for its customers.
These limits are adjustable; nevertheless, in order to raise or
lower them, one must first go through an authorization
process in the bank, which acts as a central authority in this
regard. Simply said, the nature of their business models
exacts a significant amount of control, which, depending on
the circumstances, may often impede prospects for
innovation.
In decentralized systems, on the other hand, the way

decisions are made can be set up to benefit most users, not
just the higher-ups in the system. Instead of relying on
processes that most centralized follow to evaluate each piece
of content individually, decentralized systems point to a new
paradigm in which every user on the network might actually
have an equal vote to decide what policies or content are
allowed or not.
Revenue/ Financial Models

Money is ultimately controlled by a small number of very
strong institutions, and this is true even in the case of digital
download services. For instance, Apple and Google both use
a 70-30 revenue split for mobile app sales, music sales,
e-book sales, and sales of other items that are offered on
their own platforms. Although developers do get a significant
portion of the revenue, it is essential to bear in mind that
these companies are financially centralized since they

manage every step of the transaction, including the receipt of
money and keeping a portion of the profits.
In order to win the support of content creators, decentralized

blockchain businesses are emphasizing higher pay for them.
Although there may not be a significant increase in the
number of people utilizing decentralized app stores just yet,
many of these projects provide economic structures that are
helpful to content creators. Consider for a second if in a
decentralized online store, rather than a 70-30 split, income
was divided 99-1. Customers can get services like these from
companies like Status and Blockstack.
Data Storage/Social Media

The need for private and impregnable data storage helps to
support the highly centralized organizational structure of
organizations. One example of this is the way that Facebook
stores individually identifiable information: in centralized
databases.
This is one of the reasons why there are no membership fees

to join the organization: There is the potential for at least
indirect financial benefit from the selling of data obtained
through these systems in the form of demographically-based,
targeted advertising. This possibility exists because there is a
market for this kind of advertising. Information about users,
such as their ages and hobbies, is maintained centrally,
making it not only convenient to access but also monetizable.
On social media sites that are decentralized, selling data in

return for profit from targeted advertisements is not
something that happens very often. This is a result of the fact
that user data would no longer be owned by social media
businesses if they operated on a decentralized business
model. As a result of this, people have more control over their
own data and have the potential to better protect sensitive
information.

However, companies are faced with the challenging problem
of building a viable company plan since they do not have
access to data that can be used to earn revenue through
targeted advertisements. Because of this, it may be
necessary to go from a free model to a premium, shared
economic model in which businesses get a small portion of
the micropayments made by users whenever users pay one
another for content production, likes, comments, views, etc.
Patrons of decentralized systems, on the other hand, would
need to be adaptable and willing to accept changes like this.
Examples of this model's usage may be spotted on websites
like Steemit.
Why Do We Need Blockchain

Business Models?
In and of itself, blockchain represents a ground-breaking
innovation in businesses. Because blockchain technology
makes it possible for companies to change into decentralized
platforms, the operations of such organizations may be
impacted as a direct result. It requires a change in the legal
entities, transactions, and profits involved, while at the same
time preserving expansion.
Since the inception of bitcoin in 2009, blockchain technology

and many of the applications it underpins have often been
greeted with resounding failure. Some firms' fundamentally
flawed business models contributed to the problem, in
addition to their process of implementation.
The prevalence of fraudulent Ponzi schemes operating under

the guise of genuine blockchain-based enterprises is
unfortunately alarmingly high. There are many other models,

and they all take advantage of those who are credulous.
There is a need for a business model that is built on
blockchain technology that will improve the way companies
operate and will be beneficial to end consumers from a
technological standpoint.
The blockchain-based business model needs to shift its major

focus from investors to business owners as its primary target
audience. As a result, project managers will place a higher
value on practicability than on financial benefit. When it
comes to decentralized messaging apps that are backed by
blockchain technology, SuchApp is one of the projects that
place a priority on practicality. For this reason, it is crucial that
business models based on blockchain technology be
effective on both a global and a local scale, for both the
company's own employees and its consumers.

SHOULD YOU MOVE TO A
DECENTRALIZED
BUSINESS MODEL?
Those who favor centralization often cite its two key benefits
as being increased authority and a relatively easy design.
Centralized systems, whether it be an individual product
distribution hub or a whole civilization overseen by a central
authority, are fraught with hazards. The biggest of these
hazards is the formation of a single point of failure, which has
the potential to bring the system to an abrupt and total
standstill.
On the other hand, decentralized organizations make it

possible for a greater number of people — not just a select
few — to reap the benefits of those resources. It would be
more beneficial for societies if more systems were
decentralized and dispersed.

What causes the failure of
centralized databases and
data management systems?
Security
If an outsider or an unauthorized person gets access to the
server, the data on it might be changed, destroyed, or
created if they get their hands on it. Modern companies have
a significant challenge in the form of data fraud, and the
corruption or loss of data might have serious repercussions
for the bottom line of the organization.
Reliability
If an overwhelming number of users attempt to get the same
information from a centralized database at the same time, the
server may become unresponsive or crash entirely.
Accessing information is both reliable and persistent inside a
decentralized system.
Accessibility
In the event that the central database is inaccessible as a
result of technical faults, users will not be able to use it. In
addition, some customers may find it cumbersome since the
processes are the same for all users, despite the fact that
each user may have relatively distinctive needs.
Data transfer costs

If users are located in a broad variety of time zones, it may be
challenging to keep a server connection that is stable and
reliable.
Scalability
Because the capacity of the server limits the amount of traffic

that can flow across centralized networks, growth is difficult
to achieve. Decentralized systems are extremely desirable
because of their scalability and resilience to failure brought
on by overwhelming demand.
Benefits of the decentralized

and distributed databases
In a system that is decentralized, each of the nodes is
responsible for storing their own copy of the shared data;
there is no repository that is centrally located for this data. All
of the other computers on the network will get a copy of any
new information, as well as any changes or deletions that
occur on one machine. It is not necessary for the system to
have any external regulation or support for it to work.
Databases are protected from damage in this scenario,
whether the threat comes from hostile actors or individuals
who are careless.
Because all of the peers in a decentralized network possess

the same information, the network is able to tolerate a very
high volume of traffic without being overburdened or
disrupted. Because queries are often distributed over several
nodes rather than being focused on just one, the burden is
distributed among a number of servers. This increases the
overall capacity of the network to handle data increases.
In decentralized systems, the work is spread out over a

number of different nodes. However, all of the nodes are
connected to a central server in a centralized system. In
these kinds of configurations, the central server handles all of
the data gathering, editing, uploading, and erasing requests
that come through. The capacity of the server has a limit, and
once that limit has been reached, the server will crash.

What potential advantages might a decentralized business
have?
Decentralization has been shown to increase morale and
innovation within companies, as well as the likelihood of
increased levels of cooperation and collective expertise.
Moreover, this style of leadership inspires perseverance and
individuality in those who work for the company. The
consulting and software development industries, which
depend largely on creativity and innovation, cannot afford to
overlook these rewards because of how important they are to
their success.
The increased speed with which workers make decisions will

lead to improved responses to external stakeholders and
more effective dispute resolution. Maintaining open lines of
contact with customers and soliciting their input helps to
enhance product development, which in turn results in
increased investment in research and development and the
introduction of new products. Because of their capacity to act
quickly, managers are often in a position to make decisions
that may help the firm save money.
Societal advantages of decentralized models
Trust
A key advantage of decentralized governance is that it
relieves stakeholders of the need to place all of their
confidence in a unified system. In today's society, we have
developed a level of confidence that allows us to entrust
commercial businesses and government organizations with
the most private and sensitive information we possess.
On the other hand, there are a few instances dating back to

the most recent past in which our trust has been misplaced.
Failures may occur in businesses and digital infrastructures.
Companies can be purchased or cease to exist, personal
information can be sold by social media sites, and online ads

track your every move.
When using a properly designed decentralized network,

however, you can greatly minimize — if not entirely do away
with — the need to put your confidence in and depend on
other parties to keep your data secure.
Reliability and Sustainability

Recent advancements in digital currency and
cryptocurrencies point to the possibility that decentralization
might be a workable solution for improving the management
of our financial assets. The failure of a single node in a
decentralized system does not put the whole system to a halt.
In the end, it is irrelevant how many people sign up and quit,
since the apps themselves will continue to function normally.
The processing responsibilities of a failed node in a network
are taken up by the remaining nodes in the network.
Censorship
In an attempt to exert more control over the flow of
information regarding activities taking place inside their
country, governments often limit the access that citizens have
to social media platforms. Peer-to-peer networks, on the
other hand, make it more difficult for them to censor content
or suppress people's right to free speech.
Open systems and verified owners

Anyone has the potential to develop ground-breaking new
products and services by building them on top of
decentralized systems. On the other hand, centralized
systems are often restricted and provide a limited amount of
potential for development. Additionally, ownership may be
transferred between different parties in decentralized
networks. Those individuals who contribute to the success of
a decentralized network are rewarded with rights of
ownership or a stake that increases in value in proportion to
the worth of the network.

On the other hand, whenever there is a central body in
control of a network, only that entity will gain from the growth
of the network.
Decentralization as a game-changer
It is vital to have decentralized and distributed systems in
place in order to successfully innovate and disrupt existing
social structures. As can be seen in the following, there are
now available brand fresh concepts and versions of models
of decentralized systems.
Self-sovereign identity
The concept of "self-sovereign identity" is premised on the
notion that individuals, as opposed to governmental bodies,
should be in control of their own digital identities. This is in
contrast to the traditional model, in which governments have
this authority. SSI makes it possible for online interactions to
be much like those that take place in the real world.
An individual is responsible for their own identification as well

as their own digital wallet with SSI. Because of it, each user
has full control of all of their own data at all times. After
granting access to the use of their data, individuals can
monitor an exhaustive log of all past events involving their
data. You may now have access to more choices without
having to give up your privacy to a database maintained by a
third party. Every individual is the only arbiter of their personal
identity.
Human centric-solutions
The purpose of the “human-centric solution” is to realize the
aim of providing people with meaningful products and
services that prioritize them. This approach takes into
consideration the thoughts and feelings of the general
populace and goes a long way toward resolving the urgent
issues that contemporary societies are forced to deal with.

The end result is a rise in the number of businesses whose
primary emphasis is the development of environmentally
friendly solutions that provide broad benefits to society.
Privacy by design model

When applied to systems engineering, the idea of "privacy by
design" guarantees that private information pertaining to
individuals is protected from the very beginning of the
development process. As the name suggests, the primary
objective of this approach is to advocate for the incorporation
of privacy concerns into the design and development of
products and services from the get-go, as opposed to
incorporating these considerations later on during the rollout
of the product or service.
This model is based on a few fundamental ideas, which are

as follows:
● Preventative, not remedial

When it comes to protecting sensitive information,
there is a focus on taking preventative measures.
Privacy concerns and dangers are anticipated and
neutralized before they ever materialize as a problem.
● Privacy as the default setting

All newly developed firm systems, services, products,
and/or operational processes have data protection
measures built in from the start. People do not need to
take any further precautions to ensure the safety of
their information.
● Positive sum
This is sometimes referred to as a "win-win" in certain
circles, and it suggests that all parties involved should
feel a sense of safety and security in their interactions.
Nobody's right to privacy or safety should ever be put
at risk, under any circumstances.

● End-to-end security
Stringent security protocols should be in place at the
beginning, during the whole of the data's lifespan, and
even when it comes time to delete data that is no
longer relevant.
● Visibility and transparency

The technology functions according to a set of
specified principles and objectives, both of which are
open to independent verification. Everyone involved
may rest easy knowing that everything will be
completely open and honest.
Web 3.0
The proliferation of decentralized technologies and
decentralized business models has made it possible to
realize the vision of a more fair and transparent Internet,
which was formerly considered a pipe dream. People will
have unfettered access to and control of all of their data on a
human-centric internet, eliminating the need for any third
parties to act as go-betweens.
Marketers and advertisers are currently prepared to shell out

billions of dollars to online platforms and vendors of data
storage for their services. With the use of Web 3 technology,
users are able to provide stakeholders with unrestricted
access to their data without having to worry about their
information being stolen or sold to a third party. The data will
be distributed and decentralized, which will make it very
difficult for hackers to get access to it.

Challenges to running a
decentralized business
● Because there is no one set protocol for implementing
changes in a decentralized organization, it is possible
that the process may take much more time;
● Teams run the risk of becoming disorganized when

there is no central authority figure to provide
guidance. A reliable reporting system is necessary in
order to lessen the severity of this risk;
● One of the unintended consequences of

decentralization is the possibility that certain
departments' positions may become identical to those
of other departments. For example, instead of
establishing a centralized team, customer service
personnel may be dispersed among a number of
different departments;
● When it comes to issues of corporate social

responsibility, it is not unheard of for lower-level teams
to come to a conclusion that is not well-informed,
which would then bring the whole firm into disrepute.

DO STARTUPS AND
ESTABLISHED BUSINESSES
BENEFIT FROM
DECENTRALIZATION?
Because the hierarchical structures of companies are so

deeply ingrained, decentralizing an organization that has
been around for a long time may require significant time and
work. However, there have been a few organizations that
have shown bravery by decentralizing their operations and
have seen great outcomes as a result of their efforts. Last but
not least, decentralization has the potential to significantly
boost morale and competence in such businesses due to the
high number of experienced employees who are ready to
take on increased leadership responsibilities.
The ideal level of decentralization for an organization will be

determined by the size and structure of the business. Some
minimal forms of centralization coupled with decentralization
could be more beneficial to others.
For instance, the online retailer Zappos uses a method known

as holacracy, which does away with conventional hierarchical
organizational structures such as managers and titles.
However, as detailed in The Atlantic, employees lacked a
clear route to progression, which caused them to lose
direction and drive. As a consequence, employees started
quitting in droves, taking advantage of the buyout option.

Zappos's trial with holacracy is still in its early stages, so
results cannot be determined just yet.
For most companies, establishing and delegating

decision-making power to smaller divisions under the
supervision of a centralized corporate office may be the best
option. For instance, when Unilever expanded, the company
decentralized its operations so that its numerous worldwide
branches could function as independent businesses and
swiftly adjust to changes in the countries in which they
operated. However, it has not yet done away with corporate
offices and titles completely.
It is never too early to start thinking about how the

organization will evolve as the firm grows. Nevertheless, it
may be impractical to decentralize much as a startup because
of the limited resources available. If you put together a plan
before your company expands, you won't have to make any
of the challenging decisions that are required for growth until
after things have calmed down and new employees have
been brought into the company. It is essential to have a
thorough understanding of their function in the company
before they arrive.
Before making any significant alterations to your company's

organizational structure, you should first consider how your
business will expand. Consider the ways in which things may
develop over the next decade. The ability to properly
delegate tasks to others might make you more flexible and
receptive to embracing opportunities as they present
themselves.

HOW TO BUILD A
DECENTRALIZED
ORGANIZATION
If you are in the process of transforming your company's

management, you may want to give some thought to applying
the following recommendations to build a decentralized
corporate structure:
Establish the company values

Defining an organization's guiding principles and culture is
the first step in developing a decentralized structure for that
organization. The principles of your firm may be supported by
having a robust workplace culture, which can also act as a
compass for workers who are considered for leadership roles
within the organization.
When you are establishing the values of your firm, it is

important to keep in mind both the sort of culture you want to
promote and the things that are most important to your
organization. For instance, a company that sets an emphasis
on openness and dialogue may encourage inquiries from
customers and employees and be eager to supply them with
information about how the firm operates. This kind of
company may also place a premium on fostering a sense of
community among its employees.

Include all employees
When using a decentralized management strategy, it is
essential to get input from a broad variety of knowledgeable
individuals throughout the decision-making process. When
making a decision, a decentralized company has the option
of forming a committee or consulting with other employees
for input. When organizations seek the opinions of all of their
employees, who bring a wide range of experience and points
of view to the table, the organization may be able to make
decisions that are more informed.
Prioritize training
Making training a primary focus is the most effective way to
ensure that all workers are on the same page with regard to
the obligations and expectations that are placed on them.
With the assistance of training programs that educate them
about the culture of the company as well as the management
structure, it may be simpler for professionals to adapt to the
work environment of a certain business. Participation in
continuous training programs has to be required of all
employees, not just new hires. Because of this, the company
will be able to maintain high levels of employee satisfaction
and productivity even while it continues to adapt to
innovative business strategies and goes through continual
organizational transformation.
Develop a culture of teamwork

It is essential to cultivate an atmosphere in which
collaboration is highly appreciated, since the success of
decentralized firms is contingent on the cooperation and trust
of the individuals who work for such organizations. For
professionals to enhance their decision-making and

production skills, it is necessary that they learn to work
effectively in teams and often seek the opinions of their
fellow workers. It is a good idea to conduct events aimed at
establishing teamwork and giving opportunities for workers
to network with one another in order to cultivate an
atmosphere that values collaboration and cooperation.
Encourage growth
When there are more possibilities for learning and
advancement in a given profession, the overall level of
production in a decentralized system increases. Rewarding
workers for increasing their skill sets and taking on more
duties at work may help foster professional growth and
development. As a result of this, people who are located at
the center of the organization's hierarchy have a greater
possibility of being promoted to positions of leadership,
where they may have a stronger say in strategic decisions
that impact the future of the firm.

CONCLUSION
In a nutshell, regardless of whether you approve of the
movement toward decentralization or not, it has already
arrived. Even Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, has
promised to make certain parts of the company less
centralized.
There are many examples of decentralized companies

making waves in typically centralized industries, and Bee
Token is just one of them in the home-sharing industry. In the
end, it's because decentralization offers greater advantages
to the people who really utilize the system. When people in
the community understand how much better off they would
be under decentralized companies, both in terms of safety
and economically aligned incentives, they will start
demanding this new model.

REFERENCES
The following references were consulted to create this Super

Guide:
➔ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/33711134
3_Blockchain_Disruption_and_Decentralized_Fina
nce_The_Rise_of_Decentralized_Business_Model
s
➔ https://hackernoon.com/in-decentralized-companie
s-everyone-has-a-stake-6a6069006576
➔ https://www.peoplehum.com/glossary/decentralisat
ion
➔ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/
pii/S2352673419300824
➔ https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/kn
owledge/strategy/centralization/
➔ https://theinvestorsbook.com/centralization.html
➔ https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/6ixi
73/what_would_decentralized_business_models_l
ook_like/
➔ https://www.forbes.com/forbes/1999/0111/6301142a.
html
➔ https://odinblockchain.org/decentralized-organizati
ons/
➔ https://vizologi.com/business-strategy/case-studies
/tag/decentralized/
➔ https://www.blockchain-council.org/blockchain/dec
entralized-vs-centralized/

➔ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jviFsd4hhfE
➔ https://hackernoon.com/year-is-2020-decentralize
d-trust-is-already-enabling-new-business-models-c
8913da3aa39
➔ https://www.goco.io/blog/rise-decentralized-organi
zation/
➔ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decentralization
➔ https://kennethdurr.com/1920-in-business-history-d
ecentralized-management/
➔ https://www.betterup.com/blog/decentralization-in-
management
➔ https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-dev
elopment/decentralized-organization
➔ https://medium.com/mvp-workshop/decentralized-
business-model-canvas-1-9daf6e4bc9fe
➔ https://bizfluent.com/info-8388938-topdown-mana
gement.html
➔ https://industrytoday.com/centralized-vs-decentrali
zed-manufacturing/
➔ https://thenextweb.com/news/decentralization-2-0-
beyond-semi-monopolies-uber-airbnb
➔ https://blog.dovu.io/how-decentralisation-is-creatin
g-new-business-models-90e37c42064c
➔ https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesfinancecouncil/
2018/07/30/the-economics-of-decentralized-organi
zations-the-end-of-for-profit-corporations/?sh=6fed
0c4a3966
➔ https://aws.amazon.com/blockchain/decentralizatio
n-in-blockchain/
➔ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3262510
15_Blockchain-Based_Decentralized_Business_M
odels_in_the_Sharing_Economy_A_Technology_A

doption_Perspective
➔ https://coincentral.com/comparing-centralized-vs-d
ecentralized-blockchain-business-models/
➔ https://101blockchains.com/blockchain-business-m
odels/
➔ https://recheck.io/blog/blockchain-technology/why-
decentralized-business/
➔ https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/20
21/05/10/why-business-leaders-should-prepare-for-
the-shift-to-decentralization/?sh=7552b9c5d601
➔ https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-dev
elopment/how-to-build-decentralized-organization
➔ https://www.volopay.com/blog/what-is-a-decentrali
zed-organization/

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Daniel Pereira is a Brazilian-Canadian entrepreneur that has

been designing and analyzing business models for over 15
years. You can read more about his journey as a Business
Model Analyst here.
E-mail Daniel if you have any questions

at: [email protected]
You can connect with Daniel at Linkedin:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/dpereirabr/


Decentralized Business Models-4oed1q 141767 1666249939

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Decentralized Business Models-4oed1q 141767 1666249939

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Decentralized Business Models-4oed1q 141767 1666249939

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Decentralized

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

The Business Model Analyst is a website dedicated to

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Centralization And Decentralization 18

History Of Decentralization In Business 20

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Examples Of Decentralized Business 41

How Decentralized Business Works 43

Decentralization And Blockchain 45

Should You Move To A Decentralized Business Model? 51

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Do Startups And Established Businesses Benefit From

How To Build A Decentralized Organization 62

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

About The Author 69

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Decentralized business models, a novel use of blockchain

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Decentralization refers to a management style in which

Management decentralization can be thought of as the

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Development of managerial skills

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Relieves top management

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

When the responsibility for planning and decision-making

To a similar extent, under a centralized government structure,

Because of their limited resources and workforce, small

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Executives adopt a clear strategy that consists of delegating

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Because key decisions are made at a centralized location and

Quick implementation of decisions

After the decisions have been taken, they are communicated

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Improved quality of work

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Because they are only accountable for making decisions and

Executives do not have enough time to adequately supervise

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Lack of employee loyalty

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

To better understand centralization and decentralization,

● Centralization refers to the practice of bestowing most

● The act of concentrating authority on a small number

● Formal lines of communication may be formed in a

● Under a centralized system, the amount of time it

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

● When activities are coordinated via a centralized

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

These corporations were able to do so because of the

The United States Steel Corporation v. the United States of

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]

Pierre du Pont has in the past developed intricate ways of

Instead, DuPont's data would be used to monitor the

Over the course of his career, Durant amalgamated many

Licensed to Outis Nemo Ltd , [email protected]