TUKSE

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Nucleon Separation Energy Levels of 20Ne with Numerov Method

Phyo Pa Pa Hlaing # 1 Dr.Theingi # 2


Engineering Physics Department Physics Department
Technological University Kyaukse Mandalay University of Distance Education
phyopapahlaing. [email protected] [email protected]

Abstract: In this research work, single nucleon wave function of 20Ne has been determined by solving the one-
body Schrӧdinger equation with Harmonic Oscillator potential and Woods-Saxon potential including spin-orbit
interaction. Simultaneously we have calculated the nucleon separation energy levels and wave function of 20 10 Ne
by applying Numerov Method. In our calculation, we consider that a nucleon moves freely in an average potential
20
well generated by other nucleons. We have investigated the single particle energy levels of 10 Ne to understand the
20
energy levels and wave function of 10 Ne nucleus. The separation energy and matching eigen function at the
matching point, rc were calculated by using FORTRAN language. The results of nucleon separation energy levels
and wave function of each state in 20Ne nucleus are described.

Keywords: Separation energy levels; Wave function; Wood-Saxon potential; spin-orbit interaction
In this section, we will describe how to
derive energy eigen value and corresponding wave
1.INTRODUCTION function by using Numerov Method.
The nucleon separation energy is the
minimum energy required to remove a neutron or
The time independent Schrö dinger radial equation is
proton from a nucleus. Protons and neutrons tightly

[ ]
bound together in the nucleus, despite the electrical d
2
2m ℏ l ( l+1 )
2
repulsion of the protons, because of strong nuclear 2
u ( r ) + 2
E−V ( r ) − u ( r )=0(1)
force acts on nuclear dimensions. The size of dr ℏ 2 m r2
nucleus is very small and nuclear interaction is very The equation (1) can be written as follow:
complicated. In fact the picture of nucleus is still not
2
clear. In order to understand nuclear structure and d ( ) ( ) ( )
u r +k r u r =0
its properties we use a basic assumption of the single dr
2

particle aspects in nuclei that a nucleon moves


''
independently inside the nucleus in a fixed orbit u ( r )=−k ( r ) u(r ) (2)
under the effect of central potential produced by the 2m
average interaction between remaining (A-1)
k ( r ) = 2 ¿

nucleons in it. Then we can calculate the single
20
particle energy levels of 10Ne and nucleon Firstly we split the range (r) into N points
according to “ rn = rn-1 + h”
separation energy are determined. In our calculation,
20
single particle energy levels of 10Ne by solving one Where “h” is the step.
body Schrödinger equation numerically with Then we can write the respective wave function
Numerov Method [3]. Both energy eigenvalues and
wave function can be evaluated simultaneously by un ≡u ( r n) =u ( r n−1 +h )and
using Numerov Method. This method can be
k n ≡ k ( r n )=k ( r n−1 +h ).
calculated bound state problems as well as scattering
problems. Expending the radial wave function with “h” step to
2. CALCULATION OF SINGLE point “n” according to Taylor series.
NUCLEON WAVE FUNCTION
'' n−1 n 2 4
f ( a ) −∓( x−1 ) f (a) '' '' '' h iv h vi
'
f ( x )=f ( a ) + ( x−a ) f ( a ) + ( x−a ) ± 2
un +1+ un−1=2 u ( r n ) + u (rn )+ u (rn )
2! (n−1) 2 24
(3)
∴ h2 u iv ( r n ) =u'n+1
' '' ''
+un −1−2u ( r n )
The expending wave functions are described 2 iv
as follows. h u ( r n )=k ( r n+1 ) u ( r n+1 ) −k ( r n−1 ) u ( r n−1 ) +2 k ( r n ) u(r n)
(6)
un +1=u ( r n +h )
Equation (6) is substituted in (4)
' h2 u' ' ( r n ) h3 u' ' ' ( r n ) h 4 u iv ( r n )
un +1=u ( r n ) + hu ( r n ) + + + +0 h5 2 h
2
h
2! 3! 4! u ( r n +1 )=2 u ( r n ) −u ( r n−1 )−h k ( r n) u ( r n )− k ( r n−1 ) u ( r n−1 )−
12 1

[ ] [ ]
2
h u (r n ) h u (r n )
2 '' 3 '' ' h 5 2
un+1= u(rn) + hu (rn)+ '
+ + 1+ k ( r n+1 ) u ( r n+1 )= 2 h k ( r n ) u ( r n )−¿
2 6 12 6
4 iv
h u (r n )
+0h5
[ ]
2
h
24 1+ k ( r n−1 ) u ( r n−1 )
(3.a) 12
un-1 = u(rn-h) = u(rn) - hu' (rn) + Then we get the following recursive formulas:
4 iv
h u (r n ) h u (r n ) h u ( r n )
2 '' 3 '' '
− + −¿0h5 (3.b) Forward recursive relation
2 6 24
By summing equation (3.a) and (3.b) 5 2 h
2
(r ¿¿ n−1
u ( r n +1 )=2[1− h k ( r n ) ]u (r n ) – [1+ k (r n −1 )]u 2
h u (r n)
4 iv 12 12 h
un +1+ un−1=2 u ( r n ) +h u ( r n ) +
2 '' 1+ k (r n
12 12
(7)
''
u (r) = - k(r) u(r) is substituted in above equation.
4 iv Backward recursive relation
2 h u (r n)
un +1+ un−1=2 u ( r n )−h k ( r n ) u (r n )+ 5 2 h
2
(r ¿¿ n+
12 u ( r n ) =2[1− h k ( r n+ 1) ]u (r n+ 1)– [1+ k (r n+2 )]u 2
12 12 h
2
4
h u (r n )
iv
1+ k (
un +1=2 u ( r n )−u n−1−h k ( r n ) u(r n)+ 12
12
(8)
(4)
2.1. Calculation of Bound State Energy
We take second order derivative of equation
(3.a) and (3.b). According to the properties of wave
2 3 4
function, uout and uin must be homogeneous at a point
h iv h v h vi
un +1=u ( r n )+ h u ( r n ) + u ( r n ) + u ( r n ) + u ( r n ) + 0 rc called matching point. We must taken
'' '' '' '
2 6 24 normalization at that matching point rc to get the
energy (eigen value) of corresponding wave
(5.a)
function.

'' '' '' ' h iv


2
h v h vi
3 According to continuity equation
4
un +1=u ( r n )+ h u ( r n ) + u (r n )+ u (rn )+ u (rn )+ 0
2 6 24 (u out )r c =(u¿ )r c (9)
(5.b)
By summing equation (5.a) and (5.b) (u 'out ) r c =( u '¿ ) r c (10)
We can define a function Match(E) at r c whose zeros
correspond to the energy eigen values as
' ' By using equation (16) and (17)
u out u¿
Match (E) = [ ] -[ ] .
u out r u¿ r rmax rc r max

∫ ¿ u l (r )∨¿ dr=¿ ∫|f c B uo ( r )| dr + ∫ |Bu i ( r )| dr ¿ ¿


c c
2 2 2

The energy range E is spitted into n points, En . 0 0 rc

En = En-1 + ∆ E (20)
rc rmax
For each En, we have to calculate their Eigen
(f c B)2∫|u o ( r )| dr + B2 ∫ |u i ( r )| dr =1
2 2
function uout and uin at rc point.
0 rc
When we find the energy eigen value, we
denote the outwards and inwards functions directly (21)
obtained from the recursive formulas as u o(r) and
ui(r) respectively, the physical uout(r) and uin(r) eigen 2 1
B=
functions can be written as
(f c ) ∫ |uo ( r )| dr +∫|u i ( r )| dr
2 2 2

uout ( r ) =A u o ( r ) u ¿ ( r )=B ui ( r ) (11)


(22)
' ' ' '
u ( r ) =A u ( r ) u ( r )=B u ( r )
out o ¿ i (12)
1
By substituting equations (11) and (12) in B=
equations (9) and(10)
√N
(23)
[ A u o ( r ) ]r =[B ui ( r ) ]r
c c
(13)
where, N=(f c )2∫|uo ( r )| dr +∫|ui ( r )| dr (24)
2 2
' '
[ A u o ( r ) ]r =[B ui ( r ) ]r
c c
(14)
Equations (13) – (14) The normalized wave functions are
' '
A [u0 ( r ) −uo ( r ) ]r = B[ui ( r )−u i ( r ) ]r 1
uout ( r ) = f c u o (r )
√N
c c

A=
[ ui ( r )−ui ( r )
uo ( r )−u'o ( r )
B=f c B
] (25)

u¿ ( r ) =
1
u i (r ). (26)
(15) √N
where fc = scaling factor. We calculated the energy levels and the
20
∴uout (r) = Auo(r) = fc B uo (r) inwards and outwards wave function of 10Ne with
(16) FORTRAN language.
Similarly uin (r) = B ui (r) (17) 3. INTERACTION
B is a factor that must be taken into account in the For the study of single particle energy levels
normalization process. of 20Ne, firstly we performed calculation as a single
particle nucleon moving in the average potential
2.2. Normalization well. In this research we used Woods-Saxon
To find the factor B, u out and eigen functions, we use potential including spin orbit interaction. In order to
the normalization condition. compare with Woods-Saxon potential, we have
rmax
assumed the harmonic oscillator potential strength
ℏωto be 10.456 MeV and the shape of Harmonic
∫ ¿ u l (r )∨¿2 dr=1 ¿ (18)
oscillator potential form is shown in Fig(1).
0
rmax rc rmax
3.1. Harmonic Oscillator potential
∫ |ul ( r )| =¿ ∫ dr ¿ uout (r)∨¿ +∫ dr |u ¿ ( r )| ¿ ¿
2 2 2
=
0 0 rc To test the accuracy of our numerical method
1 (19) we firstly use Harmonic Oscillator potential. One of
the very useful form used in nuclear physics is the 0d 36.6275 36.6275
harmonic oscillator potential given by 0f 47.0925 47.0925
1 2 2 1s 36.6275 36.6275
V(r) = mω r . 1p 47.0925 47.0925
2
(27) 1d 57.5575 57.5575
1f 68.0225 68.0225
Where m is the nucleon mass and  is a According to the results we can see clearly
parameter. Analytical solution for single particle that our calculated results are agree exactly with the
energy levels are given by analytical results and we are going to use this
method in our calculation with Woods-Saxon
Enl = (2n + l + 3/2) potential.

ħ 3.2. Woods-Saxon Potential


Woods-Saxon potential follows a similar
n form as the experimental nuclear density
Where n is principle quantum number and l is distributions. Therefore, the Woods-Saxon potential
the orbital angular momentum quantum number. is used in our calculation to obtain the energy levels
of various l, j states. The shape of Woods-Saxon
potential is shown in Fig. (2).
To calculate the nucleon single particle
60
energy levels of 20 10 Ne for different angular
momentum states, phenomenological Woods-Saxon
50
0f,1p potential is used. It is based on the sum of spin
independent-central potential and a spin orbit
40 ħw
0d,1s
potential. Total nuclear interaction between single
particle nucleon and other nucleons inside the core
Enl (MeV)

30 nucleus is
0p

V(r) = Vl(r) + V0(r) + Vso(r)l⃗ . ⃗s (29)


20
0s where, Vl (r) is the centrifugal potential.
10 V0(r) is the spin independent central
r(fm) potential.
0 Vso(r) is the spin orbit potential.
0 3 6 9 12
V0
Figure 1. Energy levels in Harmonic-oscillator V 0 ( r )=
potential 1+exp ( r −R
a )
Table.1. Comparisons with analytical results and ( N−Z )
V0 = V01 + V1 For protons
calculated results of single particle energy level A
(MeV) (Harmonic oscillator potential) ( N−Z )
V0= V01 - V1 For neutrons
A
state Single particle energy level(MeV)
The centrifugal potential term is described
Analytical result Numerical result
by
0s 15.6975 15.6975
0p 26.1625 26.1625
[ ]
2
ℏ l(l+1) ( r −R0 )
Vl (r) = . (30) exp
2m r 2 ao
1 1
where, m = mass of nucleon V so ( r )=−V so ( l⃗ . ⃗s ).

[ ]
2
r ao ( r −R0 )
l = orbital angular momentum quantum number 1+ exp
a0
Woods-Saxon central potential is in the form
of (33)

V0(r) = V0 fo (r) (31) Where, Vso = the strength of Woods-Saxon


spin-orbit coupling potential term.
where, V0 = the strength of Woods-Saxon potential
Typical parameters [1] for Wood Saxon potential are
fo(r) = the nuclear density
V01 = -53 MeV, V1 = -30 MeV, Vso = 22 MeV,
r 0 = 1.25 fm and a 0 = 0.65 fm.
Woods-Saxon potential
3.3. Derivation of spin-orbit interaction
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
r(fm) Woods-Saxon central potential does not have any
-12
energy splitting. Therefore, Woods-Saxon spin-orbit
interaction is used to get energy level splitting.
Woods-Saxon potential with spin-orbit coupling
V(r) MeV

-24
term is
-36 1 d
Vso(r) = Vso fo (r)( l⃗ . ⃗s ) and
r dr
-48
we get in the form of

[ ]
-60
( r−R 0 )
exp
Figure 2. Woods-Saxon central potential 1 1 ao
Vso(r) =- Vso ( l⃗ . ⃗s ).

[ ]
2
r ao ( r −R 0 )
1 1+exp
f o ( r )= a0
(r −R0 ) .
1+ exp ⁡[ ] (34)
a0
(32) The scalar product of orbital angular momentum
operator L and the intrinsic spin operator S from the
In above equation, r = radial distance from the
spin-orbit term can be expressed by using total
center
angular momentum J, as
R0 = the nuclear radius = r0 ( A-1 )1/3
⃗J = ⃗
L + ⃗S (35)
r0 = radius of a single nucleon
J =( ⃗
L + ⃗S ) .( ⃗L+ ⃗S )
2
A = mass number
a 0 = diffuseness parameter J =L +2 ⃗L . ⃗S+ S
2 2 2

Woods-Saxon potential with spin-orbit 1 2 2 2



L . ⃗S = (J −L −S ) (36)
coupling term is expressed as follows. 2
1 d
Vso(r) = Vso fo (r)( l⃗ . ⃗s ) The magnitude of the total angular momentum, the
r dr orbital angular momentum and the spin angular
momentum are
J | j m ⟩ = j ( j+1 ) ℏ | j m ⟩ (r− R0 )
2 2
2 a0
ℏ l(l+1) V0 l 1 e 2
L |l ml ⟩ =l ( l+1 ) ℏ |l ml ⟩
2 2 V ( r )= − −V so ℏ
(1+e )
2 m r2 ( r−R )0 2 r a0 (r −R0 ) 2
a0 a0
1+ e
S |s ms ⟩ =s ( s+1 ) ℏ |s ms ⟩
2 2
. (42)
Equation (36) becomes 1
For j = l− condition, the equation (32) becomes
⃗ 1 2
L . ⃗S = [ j ( j+1 )−l ( l+ 1 )−s ( s +1 ) ]ħ2 (37)
2
⃗ 1
2
3
L . ⃗S = [ j( j+1)−l(l+ 1)− ]ħ2
4
(38)
Vso(r) = Vso
1 1
(l+ 1)
exp
[ ( r−R0 )
ao ] ℏ 2.

[ ]
2
2 r ao ( r−R0 )
1 1+ exp
There are two possible conditions such as j = l+ a0
2
1 (43) And total nuclear interaction between single
and j = l− . particle nucleon and other nucleons inside the core
2
ℏ l ( l+1 )
2
V0
1 nucleus is
V ( r )= − +¿
If j = l+ , the equation (38) becomes 2 m r2 ( r−R 0)
2 1+e
a0


L . ⃗S =
1
2 [( )(
l+
1
2
1
2
3
4 )
l+ + 1 −l ( l+1 )− ħ2
] 1
V so (l+1)
1 e
( r−R 0)
a0

2
. (44)
2 r a0
( 1+ e )
( r− R0) 2
1
⃗ ⃗ = lℏ 2.
L.S (39)
a0
2
4. RESULT AND DISCUSSION
1 We have calculated the nucleon separation energy
If j = l− , the equation (38) becomes 20
2 levels and wave function of 10 Ne nucleus by
solving one body Schrödinger equation numerically

L . ⃗S =
1
2 [( )(
l−
1
2
1 3
l− +1 −l ( l+1 )− ħ2
2 4 ) ] with Numerov Method. Calculated nucleon single
particle energy levels of 20
10 Ne with different l, j
−1 2
values are described in Figure.3. The results of
= (l+1)ℏ . (40) nucleon separation energy levels are shown in
2
Table.2.
1
For j = l+ condition, the equation (32) becomes Table2. Nucleon separation energy levels with
2 Woods-Saxon potential including spin-orbit term for

[ ]
various l, j states.
( r−R 0 )
exp Nucleon separation Nucleon separation
1l 1 ao state energygy(MeV) state energygy (MeV)
Vso(r) = - Vso ℏ2.

[ ]
2 only central potential central + L.S coupling
r 2 ao ( r−R 0 )
1+exp 0s 34.6535 0s1/2 34.6535
a0
(41) 0p3/2 21.80555
0p 20.8549
And total nuclear interaction between single particle 0p1/2 18.96309
nucleon and other nucleons inside the core nucleus
0d5/2 8.80649
is 0d 6.7348
0d3/2 3.985044
1s 6.7348 1s1/2 6.7348 0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4

u(r)
According to our calculated results, the greater 0.3
orbital angular momentum is given the smaller 0.2
0.1 r(fm)
bound state energy is found. 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
10 0g,1d,2s
single particle energy(MeV)

5 1p 1/2
1p
0s 0p 0d
0 1p 3/2
0f,1p 0d 3/2 0.8
-5 0d 1s1/2 0.6
1s 0.4
-10 0d 5/2
0.2 r(fm)

u(r)
0d,1s
0
-15
0p 1/2 -0.2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0p -0.4
-20
0p -0.6
0p 3/2
-25

-30
0s 0s 0s1/2 1s 1p 1d
-35

-40
Harmonic Woods-saxon Woods-saxon Figure 4. Wave functions for 20 10 Ne by using
oscillator spin spin-orbit
potential independent potential Harmonic-oscillator potential
central potential

Figure 3. Nucleon single particle energy states in


20
Ne with three potential models,
Harmonic oscillator (left), Woods-saxon
with central potential (middle), Woods- 0.8
saxon with spin-orbit (right).
0.6
We can clearly see that energy degenerate states in 0.4
u(r)

harmonic oscillator potential. For the spin orbit


0.2
splitting we can clearly see that the higher orbital r(fm)
angular momentum d-state gives the greater energy 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
splitting than the lower angular momentum p-
state. .From this calculation we can know the last
nucleon state which can be bound in the nucleus.
Nuclear bound states may exist in 0s 1/2, 0p3/2, 0p1/2, 0s 0p 0d
0d5/2 and 0d3/2. Since the wave function can give
many information about the nuclear system the
wave function calculation is very important. Our
calculated results of wave function for different
angular momentum states are shown in Figure (4
and 5). These figures show that 0s, 0p and 0d states
have no node: 1s, 1p and 1d state has one node.
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
U(r)

0 r(fm)
-0.2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-0.4
-0.6

1s 1p

20
Figure 5. Wave functions for 10 Ne by using
Woods-Saxon potential
5. CONCLUSIONS
According to our calculated results, the greater
orbital angular momentum is given the smaller
bound state energy is found. And we also found that
the wave functions of higher orbital angular
momentum states shift to the outer region. Therefore
we can say that the greater angular momentum, the
probability of finding the nuclear bound state
becomes smaller.

6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
My great thank goes to my teacher Dr Theingi,
Associate professor, Department of Physics,
Mandalay University of Distance Education for her
valuable ideas and advices throughout this research.
I am also deeply grateful to Dr Aye Aye San, Head
of Department of Engineering Physics,
Technological University (Kyaukse) for the
permission to do this research work.
7. REFERENCES
[1] B. Alex Brown, Lecture Notes in Nuclear
Physics. Nucl. Phys. Michigan State University,
2005.
[2] H. Bando and T. Motoba, Production and Decay
of Hypernuclei, Intl. J. Mod. Phys. 1990.
[3] Peter, Y. Numerov method for integrating the
one-dimensional Schrӧdinger equation. J. Phys.
2009.
[4] P. E. Hodgson and D. J. Millener, Single Particle
States in Nuclei. Nucl. Phys. 197

You might also like