Comparative Analysis of Genetic Diversity Among Three Species of The Freshwater Fish Genus Garra (Osteichthys: Cyprinidae) Using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism
Comparative Analysis of Genetic Diversity Among Three Species of The Freshwater Fish Genus Garra (Osteichthys: Cyprinidae) Using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism
Comparative Analysis of Genetic Diversity Among Three Species of The Freshwater Fish Genus Garra (Osteichthys: Cyprinidae) Using Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism
2012
Key words: Garra, morphometric, meristic, RFLP, genetic diversity, Western Ghats.
Abstract
The genetic variation in three species of the freshwater cyprinid Garra was studied using the traditional
morphometric, meristic and Restriction fragment length polymorphism as molecular tool analysis. Samples were
collected from their respective geographic locations of southern Western Ghats. Based on the 46 morphometric and
18 meristic characters employed during this study 23 characters showed variation among the three species and hence
were utilized for the PCA ordination. The principal component analysis was performed using 15 morphometric and 8
meristic characters of which 12 components were extracted and the first three axes showed eigenvalues >1 and they
explained the variance about 81.46 % of the total variance. The genome size of the species Garra mullya ranged from
3.8-6.15 µg/mg, Garra kalakadensis ranged from 3.25- 6.3 µg/mg and Garra gotyla stenorhynchus ranged from 3.9-
6.15 µg/mg. Based on the electrophorogram, different bands of fragments in each lane and band volume were
analyzed, According to Hind III enzyme the electrophorogram analysis showed maximum fragment length
polymorphism in Garra mullya which had four fragments and the total volume of bands was 12.582 nmoles. Based
on the Eco R1 enzyme digestion the electrophorogram analysis revealed that the maximum fragment length
polymorphism in Garra mullya composed of four fragments and the total volume of bands in the entire lane was
10.5965 nmoles. Based on the Hind III and Eco R1 restriction enzymes, the cluster analysis clearly showed that the
Garra mullya and Garra kalakadensis grouped together while Garra gotyla stenorhynchus with distinct genetic
distance did not cluster with the other two species. Garra gotyla stenorhynchus can also be distinguished
morphologically from Garra mullya and Garra kalakadensis.
*Corresponding Author: M Arunachalam [email protected]
88 Raja et al.
Int. J. Biosci. 2012
89 Raja et al.
Int. J. Biosci. 2012
morphological divergence of the genus Garra, the present in each sample were determined using UV
sister group relationships of this genus is of extreme spectrophotometer. Isolated DNA samples were
interest to systematic ichthyologists, fish biologists, subjected to restriction enzyme digestion at 37º C for 2
and evolutionary biologists alike. h using EcoR1 and Hind III enzyme. After incubation
each samples were loaded in to 1% agarose gel and
In the present study, the aim is to analyze the overall electrophoresed at 50 – 100 V for one and half hours.
features of morphometric, meristic characters, and After electrophoresis, gel was placed in the gel
Restriction pattern of nuclear DNA using the document unit (BIORAD) and bands were visualized
restriction enzymes Hind III, and Eco RI regions in and were photographed. The DNA fragment in each
order to evaluate patterns of genetic variation between lane was viewed and number of band and band volume
species of Garra and to determine the phylogenetic were documented using TOTAL LAB gel analyzing
relationship of three species of the endemic genus software. The band volume data were used for
Garra in selected streams and rivers of the peninsular construction of similarity cluster using PAST software
India. (Free ware: version. 1.83).
90 Raja et al.
Int. J. Biosci. 2012
(Table 1). Of these 12 components were extracted and characters but none of them was significant in factor
the first three axes showed the eigen value >1 and also loadings.
variation is 81.46 % of the total variance (Table 2). The
first component alone explained about 53.7 % variance Characters such as head length and predorsal scales
in characters such as: Snout length, Pre nasal length, varied between Garra gotyla stenorhynchus and
Head width, Transverse breast rows, Pre anal scales, Garra kalakadensis (Head length 20.56 – 25.48 vs.
Pelvic insertion to anal origin, Lower transverse rows, 26.37 - 28.32; predorsal scales 10 vs.10 - 12) as shown
Circumpeduncular scales, Head depth at occiput and by the PCA (Fig. 2) Disc width and pelvic fin rays of
Peduncle depth showed higher factor loadings (> 0.8). Garra mullya were lower in values compared to the
The second axis explained 18.38 % variance and higher other two species and hence it has been plotted
loadings were noted in two characters Disc width and between the G. kalakadensis and G. gotyla
branched pelvic fin rays. The 3rd and 4th components stenorhynchus in the ordination.
together explained 9.28 % variance among the
Table 1. Morphometric and meristic measurements of Garra mullya, Garra kalakadensis and Garra gotyla
stenorhynchus.
Characters Garra mullya Garra kalakadensis Garra gotyla
(n=10) (n=10) stenorhynchus
(n=10)
Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD Range Mean ± SD
Snout length (SL) 45.54 - 52.39 48.89 ± 1.98 41.38 - 46.98 44.85 ± 1.61 49.26 - 58.43 54.88 ± 2.77
Pre nasal length (PNL) 32.1 - 38.09 35.57 ± 2.13 25.89 - 33.8 29.48 ± 2.73 34.29 - 42.28 38.31 ± 2.22
Head width (HW) 68.79 - 76.58 72.95 ± 2.73 64.54 - 69.12 66.82 ± 1.66 69.78 - 78.75 74.96 ± 2.85
Head depth at nostril (HDN) 34.56 - 45.32 39.45 ± 3.52 33.1 - 40.23 37.68 ± 2.36 45.39 - 53.00 47.36 ± 2.69
head depth at pupil (HDP) 45.08 - 57.41 52.07 ± 3.66 48.22 -56.13 51.81 ± 2.96 54.79 - 62.93 59.11 ± 2.58
Head depth at occiput (HDO) 63.21 - 71.73 66.66 ± 3.45 55.84 - 65.4 61.24 ± 2.97 70.73 - 79.14 74.65 ± 2.64
Peduncle depth (PD) 9.82 - 13.1 12.18 ± 0.88 9.82 - 10.59 10.24 ± 0.27 12.70 -18.07 14.76 ± 1.41
Dorsal origin to anal origin (DA) 31.22 - 40.89 37.89 ± 2.58 31.3 - 35.6 33.5 ± 1.06 35.28 - 47.12 39.5 ± 2.97
Dorsal fin base (DFB) 15.03 - 20.06 17.03 ± 1.54 11.76 -15.71 13.44 ± 1.12 16.73 - 23.10 18.3 ± 1.77
Pectoral insertion to anal origin (PECA) 48.78 - 57.43 54.62 ± 2.36 48.53- 56.22 52.16 ± 2.40 54.25 - 61.90 58.01 ± 2.92
Pelvic insertion to anal origin (PELA) 21.61 - 26.12 24.39 ± 1.18 19.41- 24.38 22.13 ± 1.49 23.75 - 34.33 27.25 ± 2.89
Head length (HL) 20.39 - 25.93 24.52 ± 1.63 26.37- 28.31 27.48 ± 0.68 20.56 - 32.60 24.05 ± 2.93
Body depth (BD) 18.23 - 25.3 22.56 ± 1.96 16.22- 21.16 19.24 ± 1.60 19.21 - 29.70 22.88 ± 2.74
Disc length (DL) 22.93 - 29.91 26.11 ± 2.76 26.52- 34.39 30.52 ± 2.68 28.27- 35.27 33.12 ± 2.19
Disc width (DW) 37.16 - 46.27 41.75 ± 3.06 48.49 - 55.39 51.01 ± 2.07 46.47- 54.31 50.26 ± 2.80
Branched pelvic fin rays (pelvic) 7-8 7.3 ± 0.45 8 8± 0.00 8 8 ± 0.00
Branched pectoral fin Rays (pectoral) 11-13 12± 0.43 12 - 14 12.90 ± 0.57 12 - 15 13.92 ± 0.79
Pre dorsal scales (predor) 10-11 10.9 ± 0.29 10 - 12 11.10± 0.88 10 10 ± 0.00
Lower transverse rows (Lowtr) 3-4 3.8 ± 0.45 3 3± 0.00 4 4 ± 0.00
Circumpeduncular scales (circp) 15-16 15.8± 0.39 12 - 14 12.60 ± 0.70 16 16 ± 0.00
Circumferential scales (circf) 22 22 ± 0.00 16 - 20 19.60 ± 1.26 22 22 ± 0.00
Transverse breast rows (breast) 5 5 ± 0.00 5 5± 0.00 6 6 ± 0.00
Pre anal scale (pre anal) 16-21 17.6 ± 2.02 14 - 17 15.70± 1.06 21-23 21.75 ± 0.62
91 Raja et al.
Int. J. Biosci. 2012
92 Raja et al.
Int. J. Biosci. 2012
Table 3. DNA Purity and Genome size of the three species of genus Garra.
Table 4. Number of fragments and band volume of Electrophorogram for the three species of genus Garra based on
the Hind III restriction pattern.
Fish species Number of Fragments Band volume Total band volume
(n moles) (n moles)
1 1.056
Garra mullya 2 5.842 12.582
3 3.216
4 2.468
Garra kalakadensis 1 4.236
2 3.924 11.284
3 3.124
Garra gotyla stenorhynchys 1 1.649
2 0.926 8.229
3 3.418
4 2.236
93 Raja et al.
Int. J. Biosci. 2012
Table 5. Number of fragments and band volume of Electrophorogram of the genus Garra based on the Eco RI
restriction pattern.
Fish species Number of Fragments Band volume Total Band volume
(n moles) (n moles)
1 2.3645
Garra mullya 2 3.1004 10.5965
3 4.1252
4 1.0064
Garra 1 4.5692
kalakatensis 2 3.6541 11.4773
3 3.2540
Garra gotyla stenorhynchys 1 1.2301
2 0.6359 7.1364
3 3.1540
4 2.1164
94 Raja et al.
Int. J. Biosci. 2012
overlap among the three species under study though G. Conservation Ecology. Publication Division,
gotyla sternorhynchus is distinct with its protuberant Manonmaniam Sundaranar University. P. 1-91.
proboscis. Data on morphological features both
morphometric characters and meristic counts are not Bossier P. 1999. Authentication of seafood products
enough to support the established genetic structure of by DNA patterns. J. Food Sci. 64, 189–193.
the different species and hence leads to taxonomic
uncertainty (Ponniah and Gopalakrishnan, 2000). Davidson WS. 1998. PCR techniques. In: Ashurst
PR, Dennis MJ, eds. Analytical methods of food
The genome size of the three species (Garra mullya, authentication. Blackie Academic & Professional.
Garra kalakadensis, and Garra gotyla stenorhynchys)
ranged from 3.25 to 6.3 µg/mg and much variation was Ferraris JD, Palumbi SR. 1996. Molecular
observed among the three species. The results reported Zoology: New York: Wiley-Liss (eds).
here regarding the genetic variation found among the
three species are in agreement with morphological Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK. 1996. Molecular
data. Garra kalakadensis (Pachaiyar river basin) was Systematics, 2nd ed. Sinaver Assoc., Sonder land,
earlier thought of as a geographically isolated Massachusetts.
population of the commonly available species G.
mullya and hence formerly ascribed to the species G. Hubbs, Lagler. 1956. Fishes of the Great Lake
mullya which was later been recognized and described Region. Bull. Grandbrook Inst. Sci. 26, 1-213.
as distinct species in this genus that comprises of at
least 12 species and subspecies in peninsular India that Johnson JA, Rajesh RP, Arunachalam M. 2007.
share a number of morphological traits. Comparative analysis of interpopulation genetic
diversity in Puntius filamentosus using restriction
Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis fragment length polymorphism RFLP analysis, Afri. J.
has been used for the analysis of genetic structures and Biotech. Vol.6 (23) pp 2682- 2686.
diversity or to distinguish among related species
(Takahashi and Ohara 2004). During the present Lockley AK, Bardsley RG. 2000. DNA-based
study, with respect to the degree of differences among methods for food authentication. Trends Food Sci
the three species, molecular data based on Technol 11: 67–77. London: p. 182–203.
electrophorogram analysis showed significant variation
in fragment length among the three species and have Nelson JS. 2006. Fishes of the World, Fourth
been congruent with morphological results. Garra edition. Wiley, New York.
mullya and Garra kalakadensis show closer
resemblance with each other and Garra gotyla Ponniah AG, Gopalakrishnan A. 2000.
stenorhynchus was distinctly separate as evident from Cultivable ornamental, sport and food fishes endemic
the cluster based on genetic linkage. to peninsular India with special reference to Western
Ghats In: Ponniah, A.G Gopalakrishnan A (eds.)
References endemic fishes diversity of Western Ghats. NBFGR-
Arunachalam M, Muralidharan M. 2008. NATP publication, National Bureau of Fish Genetic
Cypriniform fishes of Peninsular India: Taxonomy and Resources, Lucknow, India, p. 13-32
Generic descriptions. In: Arunachalam M,
Ravichandran P, and Murugesan A G (ed.)
95 Raja et al.
Int. J. Biosci. 2012
Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Takahashi D, Ohara K. 2004. Genetic variations
Molecular Cloning, a laboratory manual, 2nd Edition. estimated from PCR-RFLP analysis of two morphs of
Gold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. New York, 3, the freshwater goby Rhinogobius in the Lake Biwa
18-55. water system. Ichthyol Res. 51, 99–105 DOI
10.1007/s10228-003-0199x.
96 Raja et al.