Contract 2
Contract 2
Contract 2
SUBMITTED BY
HARSH RATHORE
(ROLL NO. 2222138)
SUBJECT TEACHER:
PROF. NEETA RAJANI
Running with a partner is troubled with drawbacks. A partnership that has gone
unpleasant can cause severe emotions and ruin a business deal. It is significant
for the two parties to be open-minded and accepting of one another’s disparities.
There must be an ability to learn and adjust. The two accomplices must be
happy to trade their specialized information and to relate as equivalents in a
mutual future.
The assets of the organization are claimed in the interest of different partners,
and they are each by and by dependable, similarly and severally, for business
credit, evaluation, or muddled issue. For instance, if a business inability to pays
on pay to a leaser, the accomplices’ private property in question to addition and
bankruptcy to repay the creditor.
Nature of Business
It is a business organization where two or more persons agreed to join together
to carry out the business for the purpose of earning the profits. It is an extension
of a sole proprietorship. It is better than sole proprietorship because in sole
proprietorship the business is carried out by the individual with limited capital
and limited skill. Due to the limited resources of a single individual carrying a
sole proprietorship, a larger business requiring more resources and investment
than available to the sole proprietor cannot be thought of such business. On the
other hand in partnership, a number of partners join together with their capital to
form an agreement and carry out a business jointly.
Meaning
“Partnership is the relation between persons who have agreed to share the
profits of a business carried on by all or any one of them acting for all”.
Examples:
A and B buy 100 tons of oil which they agree to sell for their joint account. This
forms a partnership and A and B are considered as partners.
A and B buy 100 tons of oil and agreed to share it among them. It does not form
a partnership as they had no intention to carry out business.
Number of members
Any two or more persons may form a partnership. There is no limit imposed on
the minimum and the maximum number of partners under the Partnership
Act,1932. According to Companies Act 2013, the maximum number of 100
must not exceed in case of partnership and minimum is 2 partners.
If in any case, it exceeds the maximum limit then it will amount to the illegal
association under Section 464 of Companies Act,2013. According to Section
11 of Companies Act the maximum number of partner in case of:
Agreement
The partnership must be created for the purpose of carrying the business which
is legal in nature. Co-ownership of property does not amount to the
partnership. As per the definition given in Section 2(b), a business includes any
trade, occupation or profession. It is any kind of occupation that is not
something done just for pleasure. It is an operation conducted by a particular
method that is continuous, and from which income or profits can be derived.
Each partner is entitled to carry out the business. The mutual agency exists
between the partners. Each partner is a principal as well as an agent for the other
partners.he is bound by the acts of other partners as well as can bind others by
his own act.
Sharing of profit
The agreement is to share profit and losses among the partners. The sharing of
profit and losses can be according to the ratio of the capital contributed or
equally.
It helps to distribute the burden among the partners in the case when the
partnership suffers losses.
Liability of partnership
All the partners are jointly liable for paying the debts of the firm. The liability is
unlimited which means that the partner’s private assets can be disposed of for
the purpose of paying the debts of the firm.
Test of partnership
Section 6
Section 6 of the Indian Partnership Act provides the mode of determining the
existence of a partnership. The following are the provisions in Section 6:
It is clear from Section 6 that the sharing of profits is not the ultimate test for
determining whether a partnership exists. The existence of a partnership
depends on the actual intention of the parties and the contract drawn up by
them. In some cases, an alleged partner might have a share in the profits of the
business, but that does not by default make him a partner.
The earlier position was that the share of profits is the criteria for determining
partnership, as held in the case of Waugh v. Carver (1973). The House of Lords
overruled this decision in the case of Cox v. Hickman (1860). In this case, Lord
Crownworth held that the real test of partnership is mutual agency among the
members of the particular association. However, the factor of share of profits
cannot be eliminated. Share of profits is certainly an important piece of
evidence that helps to determine the existence of a partnership, but not the
ultimate test.
Kinds of partnership
The various types of partnership are based on two different criteria.
Partnership at will
When the partners fixed the duration of the partnership firm then after the
expiration of the fixed period the partnership comes to an end. When the
partners decided to continue with the partnership even after the expiry of the
fixed period then it becomes a partnership at will.
General Partnership
when the partnership is created for the purpose of carrying out the business.
There is no particular task that has to be completed. The task is general in
nature.
Scope of Partnership Act (Section 5)
The partnership arises from the contract but not from the status. The intention of
partners is a question of the partnership. the partners may exercise any of its
power at time but must not exercise in the pursuance of illegal, fraudulent or
misconduct.
If any of the partners have made the contract without the consent of all other
partners then the question as to the validity of such contract arises. If all the
partners have accepted or ratified the contract then no question as to the validity
of such contract arise.
With the consent of all the partners, the partnership can become a member of
another firm.
Partners
The member of a partnership is called partners.it is not mandatory that all the
partners are the same or all the partners participate in the conduct of the
business or share the profit or losses equally. The partners are classified
depending on the nature of work, the extent of liability, etc. There are basically
six types of partner:
All the partners have a right to create their own terms and condition with regard
to the affairs of the business in the partnership deed. The Indian Partnership Act
has prescribed the provision to govern the relation of partners and this provision
is applicable in case when there is no deed. The various rights of the partners
are explained below:
All the agreements which restrain the person from carrying any lawful
profession, trade or business are void.
But Section 11 of the Partnership Act states that the partners can restrain each
other from carrying a business other than the firm. but such restraint must
contain in the partnership deed.
Section 18 to 22 of the Act talks about the relation of partners third parties
Section 18 prescribes that the partners are an agent of the firm for the purpose
of conducting the affairs of the business. The partners act as the principal and
agent as well. when he performs the act in his own interest he is the principal
and when he does in the interest of another partner then he is an agent. He is not
an agent for the dealings or the transactions between the partners themselves.
Section 19 states that any act which is performed by the partners in the usual
course of its business binds the firm itself. The authority to bind the firm is
implied authority
Section 20 states that partners can make a contract to restrict or expand the
implied authority of a partner.
Section 21 states that if any act is done by any partners in case of an emergency
which a prudent man would do, then such acts need to bind the firm.
Section 22 specifies that if any act is done by any partner then it must be done
in the name of the firm or in such manner which binds the firm.
Duties of partners
The existing relationship between the partners come to an end when there is a
change in the constitution of the firms. Such changes in the constitution of the
firm may occur due to the following reasons (Section 17)
Status of a minor
Section 30 states the legal provision related to the minor according to Section
18 of the Indian Contract act 1872, no person below the age of 18 years can
enter into the contract which implies that no minor can enter into a contract.
But Section 30 states that the minor cannot be a partner in a partnership firm
but he can be admitted to benefit from the partnership firm. The minor will be
liable to get only the benefits from the partnership but is not liable for any
losses or liability. The minor can be admitted to the partnership only with the
consent of all the partners.
Liabilities
Liability of partners for the acts of the firm (Section 25): All the
partners is jointly and severally liable for the acts of the firms. He is
liable only for those acts which are done at the time he is a partner.
Liability of a firm for the wrongful act of partner (Section
26): When any wrongful act or omission is done by any of its partners
in the ordinary course of its business or with the consent of others
partners then the firm is liable to the same extent as a partner.
Liability of a firm for the misapplications by partner (Section 27):
when any partner acting as an agent receives the money from the third
party and misapplies it or the firm receives the money and money are
misappropriated by any of its partners then the firm is liable to pay for
the loss suffered.
How is registration done?
Section 58 explains the procedure of the registration of a partnership firm.
Section 59 states that when the Registrar is satisfied that the conditions
of Section 58 are complied with then he shall record an entry of the statement in
a register called the Register of Firms, and shall file the statement.
Modes of introduction
A retired partner continues to be liable for the acts of firms and other partners
till he or any other partners give public notice about his retirement. When the
third party does not know that he was a partner and deals with the firm; then in
such case a retired partner is not liable. if it is a partnership at will then there is
no requirement to give public notice about his retirement.
The outgoing partner may enter into an agreement to not carry similar business
or activities within a specified period of time.
Generally, the partnership comes to end on the death of a partner but if there is a
contract between partners to continue with the partnership on the death of a
partner then surviving partner continues with the business after clearing the
deceased partner estate from any liability for the future acts of the firms.
When the any of the partners ceases to be a partner or dies and remaining
partner continues with the business without settling the accounts then the
outgoing partner is liable to get a share from the profit earned by the firm since
the date he ceases to be a partner.
The share may be attributable to the use of a share of his property or 6% interest
per annum on the amount of share in his property.
The surviving partner has the option to purchase the share of the deceased
partner and if they purchase it then the deceased partner has no right to get the
profit derived from such property.
Dissolution of a firm
Section 39 to 44 deals with the Dissolution of a firm.
Sometimes circumstances arise when the firm gets dissolved. Sometimes a firm
is dissolved voluntary or by the order from the court. There are various modes
prescribed under Section 39 to 44 for the dissolution of a partnership firm. Even
when the partnership is dissolved then it gives certain rights and liabilities to the
partners.
45)
The partners are liable for the acts of the firm to the third party until public
notice is given. A partner who is declared as insolvent, or who is retired, the
estate of a person who dies, or who was not known as a partner at the time of
dealing with the third party will not be liable for the act.
When the firm is dissolved every partner has a right to apply for the firm’s
property in the payment of debts and liabilities. If there is any surplus it needs to
be distributed among the partners.
The partners have mutual obligations and rights until the affairs of the firm is
wound up.
When the partnership has dissolved the accounts of the partners needs to be
settled under the usual course of business. Various modes can be used for the
settlement of accounts.
The asset of the firm and the capital contributed by the partners to meet up the
deficiency in the capital is applied in the following order:
In a case when there are joint debts from the firm and the separate debts from
the partner then joint debts from the firm is given priority and if any surplus is
left then separate debts from the partner is to be paid off.
The property of the individual partners is applied firstly for the payment of
separate debts.
Personal Profit Earned After Dissolution of Firm (Section 50 and Section
53)
When the firm is dissolved by the death of the partner and business is carried
out by the existing partners or his legal heirs then they have to account for the
personal benefit earned before winding up the partnership.
Section 53 states that if there is no contract the partner can restrain other
partners from carrying similar activities, or using the firm’s name or firm’s
property for their own benefit until the winding up process is complete.
When the firm is dissolved before the expiry of a fixed period, then a partner
paying a premium can receive a return of a reasonable part of the premium.
Such rules are not applicable in a case when the partnership is dissolved by:
When the partnership arising from the contract is rescinded due to fraud and
misrepresentation then the party who has rescinded the contract will be liable
as:
After the debt of the firm is paid the lien on remaining assets. He will be treated
as a creditor for the payment of any debts made by him.
The goodwill is treated as an asset. The goodwill is included in the assets while
settling the account after the dissolution of the firm. The goodwill may be sold
separately or with other assets. Once the firm is dissolved and goodwill is sold
then any partners can carry on a similar business or advertise a business
competing with the buyers of the goodwill. The partners are prohibited from
doing the following acts:
Conclusion
At the point when some activity is finished by the assent of the considerable
number of individuals and on the off chance that some benefit is earned, at that
point it is shared among the various partners. Furthermore, comparable is the
situation when some misfortune happens then that is additionally facial hair
among all the individuals, and it isn’t so much that just one needs to assume
liability or give pay. So, in my view Partnership is a decent type of working
together than an organization that is claimed by a solitary individual.
BIBLOGRAPHY
1. https://www.toppr.com/guides/business-laws/the-indian-partnership-act/
consequences-of-dissolution-of-a-firm/
2. https://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/partnership/index.php?Title=Indian
%20Partnership%20Act,%201932
3. http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/158/Indian-Partnership-Act,1932.html
4. https://www.lawnotes.in/Indian_Partnership_Act,_1932