Sovereign Debt: A Guide For: Economists and Practitioners First
Sovereign Debt: A Guide For: Economists and Practitioners First
Sovereign Debt: A Guide For: Economists and Practitioners First
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/sovereign-
debt-a-guide-for-economists-and-
practitioners-first-edition-edition-abbas/
textbookfull
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/sovereign-debt-and-human-rights-
ilias-bantekas/
https://textbookfull.com/product/economics-for-policy-makers-a-
guide-for-non-economists-gustavo-rinaldi/
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-bayesian-way-introductory-
statistics-for-economists-and-engineers-first-edition-nyberg/
https://textbookfull.com/product/bowtie-methodology-a-guide-for-
practitioners-1st-edition-sasho-andonov/
Essentials of abdomino-pelvic sonography : a handbook
for practitioners First Edition Goyal
https://textbookfull.com/product/essentials-of-abdomino-pelvic-
sonography-a-handbook-for-practitioners-first-edition-goyal/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advising-the-ultra-wealthy-a-
guide-for-practitioners-gregory-curtis/
https://textbookfull.com/product/mindful-medical-practitioners-a-
guide-for-clinicians-and-educators-1st-edition-patricia-lynn-
dobkin/
https://textbookfull.com/product/essentials-of-abdomino-pelvic-
sonography-a-handbook-for-practitioners-first-edition-swati-
goyal/
https://textbookfull.com/product/database-and-application-
security-a-practitioners-guide-1st-edition-danturthi/
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Sovereign Debt
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Sovereign Debt
A Guide for Economists and Practitioners
Edited by
S . A L I A B BA S , A L E X P I E N KOWSK I ,
AND KENNETH ROGOFF
1
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
1
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© International Monetary Fund 2020
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2020
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2019945698
ISBN 978–0–19–885082–3
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198850823.003.0001
Printed and bound in Great Britain by
Clays Ltd, Elcograf S.p.A.
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
Nothing contained in this Work should be reported as
representing the views of the IMF, its Executive Board, member
governments, or any other entity mentioned herein.
The views in this Work belong solely to the Editors and Contributors.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Foreword
Since the 1980s Latin America Debt Crisis, the International Monetary Fund
has played a central role in preventing and resolving sovereign debt crises. We
have supported our members regain debt sustainability and market access
through liquidity support, and facilitated official and private sector coordin
ation in the provision of new money and debt relief. This is the Fund’s power
ful ‘catalytic role’ in helping countries in crisis.
The IMF has also led in sovereign debt research and innovation. The devel
opment of historical debt databases, the advances in debt sustainability ana
lytics, the evolution of the Fund’s lending framework (not to mention the
extensive research underlying it), and the promotion of collective-action
clauses, have all supported efforts to prevent, and more efficiently resolve,
sovereign debt crises.
The need for a clear understanding of the opportunities and risks associ
ated with sovereign debt has never been greater than today. Public debt has
ballooned since the global financial crisis and the creditor base has become
more fragmented and complex. Many countries are facing vulnerabilities, and
new crises will occur, as they have many times in the past. Each crisis reminds
us of some old problems, but it also highlights new challenges.
This book provides a stock-take of the perennial issues—what motivates
debt accumulation; how should debt be monitored, recorded and managed;
and what strategies are available to reduce debt, and where needed, restruc
ture it. It also seeks to identify new problems, for example, the issue of debt
transparency, where obligations are hidden or the terms are opaque; or the
growing number of official sector creditors that may make it more difficult to
coordinate timely debt relief when needed.
In many cases, there is currently no consensus on the appropriate policy
response. Indeed, sovereign debt is a complex field where economic and legal
thinking is evolving rapidly, with potentially profound effects on the lives of
many people.
This underscores the need for the IMF to be continuously learning and
innovating to remain at the frontier of the subject, notwithstanding our sub
stantial expertise accumulated through our involvement in four decades worth
of debt crises. Accordingly, this publication pulls together contributions by
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
vi Foreword
Christine Lagarde
Managing Director, International Monetary Fund
July 2019
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Contents
Introduction1
1. Public Debt through the Ages 7
Barry Eichengreen, Asmaa El-Ganainy, Rui Pedro Esteves,
and Kris James Mitchener
2. Concepts, Definitions and Composition 56
Serkan Arslanalp, Wolfgang Bergthaler, Philip Stokoe,
and Alexander F. Tieman
3. The Motive to Borrow 102
Antonio Fatás, Atish R. Ghosh, Ugo Panizza,
and Andrea F. Presbitero
4. Debt Sustainability 151
Xavier Debrun, Jonathan D. Ostry, Tim Willems,
and Charles Wyplosz
5. Debt Management 192
Thordur Jonasson, Michael G. Papaioannou, and Mike Williams
6. Reducing Debt Short of Default 225
Tom Best, Oliver Bush, Luc Eyraud, and M. Belen Sbrancia
7. Sovereign Default 275
Julianne Ams, Reza Baqir, Anna Gelpern, and Christoph Trebesch
8. The Restructuring Process 328
Lee Buchheit, Guillaume Chabert, Chanda DeLong,
and Jeromin Zettelmeyer
9. Challenges Ahead 365
Hugh Bredenkamp, Ricardo Hausmann, Alex Pienkowski,
and Carmen Reinhart
Appendix405
S. Ali Abbas and Kenneth Rogoff
Index of Names423
General Index429
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Editors Bios
S. Ali Abbas:
Ali Abbas is deputy chief of the Debt Policy division in the Strategy, Policy, and
Review department of the International Monetary Fund. He has led key reforms to
the Fund’s lending and crisis resolution frameworks; served as Fund liaison to the
Paris Club; and been closely involved in several exceptional access Fund-supported
programs, including Ireland 2010, Ukraine 2015, and Argentina 2018. He has pub
lished on fiscal policy, government financing, and sovereign debt crises, and helped
compile widely-used databases on the level, dynamics and composition of public debt.
Ali has a D-Phil in Economics from the University of Oxford (where he was a Rhodes
Scholar) and served as an Overseas Development Institute fellow in Tanzania.
Alex Pienkowski:
Alex Pienkowski is an economist in the European department of the International
Monetary Fund with a focus on sovereign debt, in particular the resolution architecture
for debt crises, the costs and benefits of state-contingent debt and the propagation of
shocks during crises. He has worked on a range of countries including Portugal,
Argentina, Ukraine and Mongolia. Prior to the IMF, Alex worked for the Bank of
England for five years. He specialised in international issues in both the financial
stability and monetary analysis departments of the Bank. Much of his time involved
working on the euro area sovereign debt crisis. Alex was also an Overseas Development
Institute fellow in Malawi between 2007–09.
Kenneth Rogoff:
Kenneth Rogoff is Thomas D. Cabot Professor at “http://www.harvard.edu/” Harvard
University. From 2001–2003, Rogoff served as Chief Economist at the “http://
www.imf.org/external/index.htm” International Monetary Fund. His widely-cited
2009 bookwith “http://www.carmenreinhart.com/” Carmen Reinhart, “http://www.
reinhartandrogoff.com/” This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly,
shows the remarkable quantitative similarities across time and countries in the run-
up and the aftermath of severe financial crises. Rogoff is also known for his seminal
work on exchange rates and on central bank independence. Together with Maurice
Obstfeld, he is co-author of “https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/foundations-international-
macroeconomics” Foundations of International Macroeconomics, a treatise that has
also become a widely-used graduate text in the field worldwide. Rogoff ’s 2016 book
“http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10798.html” The Curse of Cash looks at the past,
present and future of currency from standardized coinage to crypto-currencies and
central bank digital currencies. The book argues that although much of modern mac
roeconomics abstracts from the nature of currency, it in fact lies at the heart of some
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Editors Bios ix
of the most fundamental problems in monetary policy and public finance. His
monthly syndicated column on global economic issues is published in over 50 coun
tries. Rogoff is an elected member of the “http://www.nasonline.org/” National
Academy of Sciences, the “https://www.amacad.org/default.aspx” American Academy
of Arts and Sciences, and the HYPERLINK “http://www.group30.org/” Group of
Thirty, and he is a senior fellow at the “http://www.cfr.org/about/membership/roster.
html” Council on Foreign Relations. Rogoff is among the top ten on RePEc’s ranking
of economists by scholarly citations. He is also an international grandmaster of chess.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
List of Contributors
Serkan Arslanalp is a deputy division chief in the Strategy, Standards, and Review
division of the IMF’s Statistics Department. Prior to this, he worked in the Regional
Studies Division of the Asia and Pacific Department and the Global Markets Analysis
Division of the Monetary and Capital Markets Department. Mr. Arslanalp joined the
Fund in 2004 and has worked on various county assignments, including Japan and
Ukraine. He has contributed to the Asia and Pacific Regional Economic Outlook and
the Global Financial Stability Report on issues related to demographics, financial
markets, China spillovers, sovereign risk, and financial stability. Arslanalp holds a
Ph.D. in economics from Stanford University and an undergraduate degree in eco
nomics from MIT.
Reza Baqir is a Pakistani economist who serves as the twentieth and current Governor
of the State Bank of Pakistan. He previously worked in several high-profile roles in the
IMF, most recently as senior resident representative to Egypt. During his time at the
Fund he also led several critical reforms on assessing debt sustainability and the Fund’s
lending architecture. He holds degrees from Harvard University and the University of
California, Berkeley.
List of Contributors xi
He regularly lectures in the United States and Europe and frequently publishes on
issues related to IMF operations and legal aspects of international finance.
Tom Best is an economist in the IMF’s Strategy, Policy and Review Department,
where his current work focuses on sovereign debt issues, including the Fund’s debt
sustainability frameworks. Prior to the IMF, he spent four years at the Bank of
England, working in the International and Monetary Analysis departments. He holds
undergraduate and masters degrees from the University of Cambridge.
Hugh Bredenkamp has been a Deputy Director in the Strategy, Policy and Review
Department of the IMF since 2008. He began his career as an economic advisor to the
UK Treasury from 1982 to 1988. Since joining the IMF, he has worked on countries in
Western Europe, the former Soviet Union, Asia, and Africa, where he was mission
chief for Ghana. He was the Fund’s senior resident representative in Turkey from 2004
to 2007. On the policy side, he helped develop the international debt relief initiative
for low-income countries in the mid-1990s, and has supervised work on various
reforms of the Fund’s lending facilities and on sovereign debt issues.
Lee Buchheit has enjoyed a legal career spanning forty-three years, during which
time he has worked on the sovereign debt restructurings of over two dozen countries
including the Philippines, Ecuador, Russia, Iraq, and Greece. He is the author of two
books in the field of international law and a co-editor of the volume “Sovereign Debt
Management”. Buchheit is an Honorary Professor at the University of Edinburgh Law
School, a Visiting Professor at the Centre for Commercial Law Studies in London and
a Non-resident Fellow at the Columbia University Law School.
Oliver Bush is a Ph.D. candidate in economic history at the London School of
Economics. He has previously worked at the CBI and the Bank of England and stud
ied at the Universities of Oxford, London, and California at Berkeley. His current
research interest is twentieth-century British macroeconomic history.
Guillaume Chabert is a graduate from the leading French engineering school
Ecole Centrale de Paris, the Paris Institute of Political Studies, and the French
Senior Civil Service School (ENA). In 2000 he embarked on his career at the
Directorate General for Local Government at the French Ministry of the Interior,
before joining the Directorate General of the Treasury at the French Ministry of
Finance in 2004. In 2010, Chabert was appointed G20 Project Manager heading up
the team coordinating the 2011 French Presidency of the G20 (and G7/G8) at the
Directorate General of the Treasury. Following two years in Stockholm, where he
managed the Regional Department of Economic Affairs for the Nordic countries, he
was assigned Adviser to the Prime Minister, in charge of the Economy, Finance and
Business, in September 2013. In 2014, he was appointed Deputy Chief of Staff of the
Minister of Finance. In 2015, Chabert took up his present position as Assistant
Secretary for Multilateral Affairs, Trade and Development Policies at the Directorate
General of the Treasury. He is also Co-Chair of the Paris Club and G20/G7 Financial
Sous-Sherpa for France.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
institutional economics and public finance. His research provides perspective on the
globalization of finance, financial crises, sovereign debt, financial market architecture,
and exchange rate regimes, as well as rent-seeking and corruption in public office.
Luc Eyraud is deputy division chief in the African Department of the IMF. He spent
a large part of his career working on fiscal issues in the IMF Fiscal Department, where
his research focused mostly on fiscal multipliers, fiscal rules, and fiscal decentraliza
tion. Prior to joining the IMF, Luc Eyraud worked at the French Treasury in the
macroeconomic analysis department.
Atish Rex Ghosh is the IMF Historian. Formerly, Assistant Director, and Chief,
Systemic Issues Division, Research Department, his previous assignments at the IMF
have included work on the Ukrainian (1994–97) and Turkish (1998–99) stabilization
programs. He works on issues related to the stability of the international monetary
system, including exchange rate regimes, external balance dynamics, capital flows,
and monetary, exchange rate, and fiscal policies. He was Assistant Professor of
Economics and International Affairs, Princeton University, and he holds degrees from
Harvard University and Oxford University. He has published numerous articles and
several books on open economy macroeconomics and international finance. Ghosh is
also the author of a novel.
founded the Center for Public Policy. His research interests include issues of growth,
macroeconomic stability, international finance, and the social dimensions of develop
ment. He holds a Ph.D in economics from Cornell University.
Thordur Jonasson is a Deputy Division Chief in the Debt and Capital Market
Instruments Division in the IMF Monetary and Capital Markets Department. Prior to
joining the IMF, he was a Senior Securities Markets Specialist in the Global Capital
Markets Practice of the World Bank working on developing public and private debt
markets and participating in the Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP). He
has also been an expert on public debt management and debt market development for
the IMF, World Bank, and the Commonwealth Secretariat participating in technical
assistance and financial sector assessment missions. His professional experience also
includes the National Debt Management Agency in Iceland where he worked in dif
ferent capacities until appointed Chief Executive. Jonasson has also held positions in
the private sector as an advisor to municipalities and state-owned corporations on
debt management, treasury, and international funding. He has published on capital
market development and debt management.
Kris James Mitchener is the Robert and Susan Finocchio Professor of Economics at
Santa Clara University, Research Associate at the NBER and the Centre for
Competitive Advantage and the Global Economy (CAGE), and Research Fellow at the
CEPR and CESifo. His research focuses on economic history, international econom
ics, macroeconomics, and monetary economics, and he is a leading expert on the his
tory of financial crises. Prior to his current positions, he was professor of economics at
the University of Warwick, and has held visiting positions at the Bank of Japan, the
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, UCLA, and CREi at Universitat Pompeu Fabra. He
is the editor of Explorations in Economic History and serves on the editorial boards of
other academic journals. He received his B.A. and Ph.D. from the University of
California, Berkeley.
Jonathan D. Ostry is Deputy Director of the Research Department at the IMF and a
Research Fellow at the CEPR. His recent responsibilities include leading staff teams
on: IMF-FSB Early Warning Exercises on global systemic macrofinancial risks; vul
nerabilities exercises for advanced and emerging market countries; multilateral
exchange rate surveillance, including the work of CGER, the Fund’s Consultative
Group of Exchange Rates, and the External Balance Assessment; international finan
cial architecture and reform of the IMF’s lending toolkit; capital account management
and financial globalization issues; fiscal sustainability issues; and the nexus between
income inequality and economic growth. Past positions include leading the division
that produces the IMF’s flagship multilateral surveillance publication, the World
Economic Outlook, and leading country teams on Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and
Singapore. Ostry is the author of a number of books on international macro policy
issues and numerous articles in scholarly journals and he has been widely cited in
print and electronic media. His work on inequality and unsustainable growth has also
been cited in remarks made by President Barack Obama. He earned his B.A. from
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
List of Contributors xv
Queen’s University (Canada) at age 18, and went on to earn a B.A. and M.A. from
Oxford University, and graduate degrees from the London School of Economics and
the University Chicago. He is listed in Who’s Who in Economics (2003).
Ugo Panizza is Professor of International Economics and Pictet Chair in Finance and
Development at the Graduate Institute Geneva. He is also the director of the Institute’s
Centre for Finance and Development, Director of the International Centre for
Monetary and Banking Studies (ICMB), Vice President of CEPR, Fellow of the
Fondazione Einaudi, and Editor of International Development Policy. Previously, he
was Chief of the Debt and Finance Analysis Unit at UNCTAD and worked at the
Inter-American Development Bank and the World Bank, alongside holding teaching
and research posts at the American University of Beirut and the University of Turin.
M. Belen Sbrancia is an economist at the IMF who received her Ph.D. from the
University of Maryland. Sbrancia’s research interests are mostly related to debt issues,
especially the role of financial repression in reducing debt and sovereign debt restruc
turing mechanisms. During her years at the IMF she has worked on a variety of
topics/countries, but most recently on vulnerable countries such as Argentina,
Lebanon, Ukraine, and now Venezuela.
Alexander F. Tieman is deputy division chief in the IMF’s Fiscal Affairs Department.
In this capacity he co-manages a division consisting of around twenty economists
and support staff. In addition, Tieman works on various cross-country and analytical
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
projects. His seveteen-year experience at the IMF include a work on program and
surveillance countries; financial sector surveillance and stress testing; and a field
assignment as IMF Resident Representative in Skopje, North Macedonia. Prior to
joining the Fund, he lectured in microeconomics at the Vrije University and Tinbergen
Institute in Amsterdam, the Netherlands and worked at the research department of
the Dutch Central Bank. He has a Ph.D. in microeconomics from the Vrije University/
Tinbergen Institute in the Netherlands.
Christoph Trebesch is a Professor of Economics at the University of Kiel and at the
Kiel Institute for the World Economy, where he heads the Research Area “International
Finance and Global Governance”. Before coming to Kiel, he was an Assistant Professor
at the University of Munich and completed his Ph.D. at the Free University of Berlin,
with research stays at Yale and at the IMF. His research focuses on international
finance and international macroeconomics, economic history, and political economy.
Tim Willems is an economist in the Debt Policy Division (within the Strategy, Policy,
and Review Department) of the IMF. He joined the IMF in 2015, after having spent
three years as a post-doctoral research fellow at Nuffield College, University of Oxford.
Prior to that, he obtained his Ph.D. from the University of Amsterdam, whilst also
spending time at the Dutch Central Bank and the Central Bank of Sweden. His
research has been published in a variety of academic journals.
Mike Williams established the UK Debt Management Office as its first CEO in 1998.
Prior to that he worked for nearly twenty-five years in the UK Treasury. Since leaving
the DMO in early 2003, Mike Williams has worked as an independent consultant on
government debt and cash management. Through the IMF, World Bank, and others,
he has worked extensively with governments across most regions of the world, in par
ticular on debt management policies, and institution and capacity building; on gov
ernment bond market development; and on developing a more efficient and proactive
approach to the management of the government’s cash.
Charles Wyplosz is Emeritus Professor at the Graduate Institute in Geneva where he
was Director of the International Centre for Money and Banking Studies. Previously,
he has served as Associate Dean for Research and Development at INSEAD, as
Director of the Ph.D. program in Economics at the Ecole des Hautes Etudes en
Science Sociales in Paris and as Policy Director of the CEPR. His main research areas
include financial crises, European monetary integration, fiscal policy, and regional
monetary integration. He is the co-author of two leading textbooks and has published
several books and many professional articles. He has served as consultant to many
international organizations and governments and is a frequent contributor to public
media. A French national, Wyplosz holds a degree in Engineering from Ecole Centrale,
Paris, and a Ph.D. in Economics from Harvard University. He has been awarded the
title of Chevalier de la Légion d’Honneur.
Jeromin Zettelmeyer is the Dennis Weatherstone Senior Fellow at the Peterson
Institute for International Economics, a CEPR research fellow, and a member of
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Introduction
Not since the aftermath of the Second World War has the topic of sovereign
debt taken such importance in public policy debate. Reeling from the effects
of the Global Financial Crisis, public debt-to-GDP ratios in advanced econ
omies are at levels not seen in over half a century.1 Debt vulnerabilities are on
the rise in many emerging markets, with some in outright default, and others
facing non-trivial financing pressures. And the World Bank and the IMF
assess more low-income countries to be in, or at high risk of, debt distress
than at any time since the official debt relief operations of the 2000s. The need
to place this difficult conjuncture into historical context, identify its unique
aspects, and discuss options for the future, constitutes our first motivation for
compiling this book.
This work also seeks to highlight the important distinctions within each
country group. Indeed, among advanced economies, the constraints facing
the United States, a reserve currency issuer, are quite different from those of,
say, Portugal which cannot print its own currency. Among emerging markets,
the challenges facing resource-rich Saudi Arabia are vastly different than
those facing a diversified economy such as the Philippines. Similarly, the
policy trade-offs facing Ethiopia, a large and growing economy, are not the same
as those facing Grenada, a small island state vulnerable to natural disasters.
It is also the case that some policy questions apply to all countries: How
can countries build buffers to deal with the next stress episode when they
have yet to fully recover from the last? How can an aging population be sup-
ported without over-burdening future generations? How can spillovers from
debt crises be reduced without encouraging greater risk taking in the future?
And how can economies achieve their longer-term sustainable development
goals without ending up with excessive debt? These are issues that interest
policymakers, business people, and researchers alike. But they cannot be
1 Throughout this volume, the terms sovereign debt and public debt are used interchangeably. This
represents a departure from usage of these terms in some earlier literature, where sovereign debt
was associated with a country’s total external debt, while public debt connoted a government’s local
currency debt.
S. Ali Abbas, Alex Pienkowski, and Kenneth Rogoff., Introduction In: Sovereign Debt. Edited by S. Ali Abbas,
Alex Pienkowski, and Kenneth Rogoff, Oxford University Press (2020). © International Monetary Fund.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198850823.003.0001
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
2 Introduction
Introduction 3
4 Introduction
Chapter 1 provides a history of sovereign debt from the Middle Ages to the
Global Financial Crisis. It explores the role of sovereign debt in building, and
defending, kingdoms and city-states, examining the role of trust and institu-
tions in deepening the market for such debt. It charts how, as the legitimacy of
governments grew, borrowing was increasingly used to finance infrastructure
and current spending, rather than just wars. The chapter takes a close look at
some of the great build-ups in debt, contrasting the Great Depression with the
Great Recession. It also looks at how debt has been reduced, and how various
policies have supported, or acted against, these debt reductions. History has a
habit of repeating itself, so the chapter concludes with some lessons for policy-
makers today. Chapter 2 focuses on the present, starting with a detailed discus-
sion on what exactly is sovereign debt. It shows the surprisingly large variation
in definitions, and how the choice of institutional coverage, instrument type,
or valuation method can lead to widely different numbers. In the United States
for example, debt could be anywhere between US$20–75 trillion, depending
on which definition is used. Debt is then placed in context to the rest of the
sovereign’s balance sheet, exploring how other assets and liabilities (current or
future, explicit or contingent) can impact our view of a country’s indebtedness.
Finally, the chapter takes a snapshot of the world’s major creditors and debtors
today, and explores how this landscape has shifted in recent years.
Chapter 3 takes a step back to consider why sovereigns borrow, and what
explains the often-high level of debt seen in many countries today. Some of
these motives are “good,” such as to support growth in a recession or to
finance human and physical capital. Nevertheless, high debt in many coun-
tries can also be attributed to political failures and intergenerational transfer
problems. In addition, the chapter looks at the debt overhang problem, and
whether very high debt is associated with lower trend growth. The past dec-
ade of research has largely confirmed Reinhart and Rogoff ’s2 conjecture that
the answer is “yes,” in part because countries with very high debt have less
flexibility in using countercyclical fiscal policy in dealing with recessions,
financial crises, and other exigencies. Reinhart and Rogoff carefully avoid
claiming causation, which is a much more difficult issue and an active area of
research. The issue of whether inherited high debt weighs on growth is not to
be confused (as many polemicists do) with whether being able to run fiscal
deficits can temporarily raise growth (where there is little debate that the
answer is yes, at least qualitatively).
2 Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2010a, “Growth in a Time of Debt,” The American
Economic Review, 100(2), 573–8.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Introduction 5
6 Introduction
established, the chapter explores why a default might occur, looks at the role
of mismanagement and misfortune, and also the extent to which these events
can be “self-fulfilling.” Finally, the cost of default is explored, alongside potential
policies that can mitigate it. Chapter 8 continues with the theme of sovereign
default but focuses on the process itself. It gives a “play book” on how a country
might approach a debt restructuring, something that to our knowledge has
not been done before. The chapter gives an overview of the various processes
and institutions that need to be navigated, and also the “carrots” and “sticks”
that can be used to incentivize creditors to participate in an orderly restruc-
turing deal. At the heart of this process is the ability to coordinate creditors in
a way that provides adequate debt relief for the sovereign, without damaging
its ability to engage in international markets in the future.
Chapter 9 seeks to distill the lessons from the previous chapters, and apply
them to the issues faced by creditors and debtors today. In addition to the
rapid increase in debt seen over the last ten years, many countries have also
seen a significant shift in their creditor base towards a structure that might
make debt crises harder to resolve in future. And in advanced countries espe-
cially, low growth partly driven by demographic factors will act as a signifi-
cant headwind to reducing debt in coming years. Potential policy solutions
are divided into those that help preserve ample policy space for responding
to recessions, financial crises, and other sudden expenditure needs, and to
policies to help a country navigate debt difficulties should it face them. To
help make this book a useful reference for economic and legal scholars, we
have also included a comprehensive data annex at the end of this book, which
is also available online.3 This sets out the main sources of data on sovereign
debt, including a description of the data and notes for researchers.
Finally, we have a number of people to thank for their comments, con
structive criticism, and advice when developing this book including Sean Hagan,
Vitor Gaspar, Martin Mühleisen, Hugh Bredenkamp, and Mark Flanagan.
In addition, we would like to thank all of the discussants of the September
13–14, 2018 conference where the first drafts of the book’s chapters were
showcased. These include Marc Flandreau, Michael Bordo, Olivier Jeanne,
Rafael Molina, Richard Hughes, Paolo Mauro, Doug Elmendorf, Elena Duggar,
Jill Dauchy, Michael Gapen, Joseph Gagnon, Margaret Jacobson, Lorenzo
Giorgianni, Graciela Kaminsky, Eric Lalo, and Elena Daly.
3 See Abbas, S. Ali and Kenneth Rogoff, “A Guide to Sovereign Debt Data”, IMF Working Paper, 2019.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
1
Public Debt through the Ages
Barry Eichengreen, Asmaa El-Ganainy,
Rui Pedro Esteves, and Kris James Mitchener
1. Introduction
Sovereign debt is a Janus-faced asset class.1 In the best of times it relaxes the
domestic constraint on savings, smooths consumption, and finances investment.
Investors see it as a safe haven, as delivering “alpha,” and as a means of portfolio
diversification. In the worst of times it is associated with debt overhangs,
banking collapses, exchange-rate crises, and inflationary explosions. Investors
see it unenforceable, illiquid, and prone to messy debt workouts.
In this chapter, we use history to analyze both aspects. Historical evidence
provides insight into the seasons of darkness by increasing sample size. This
helps because defaults on sovereign debt are not as frequent as on, say, cor
porate bonds. History also can enrich our understanding of those features of
sovereign debt that are associated with crisis resolution, since there are vari
ations over time in the structure of debt contracts, their enforceability, and
the costs of default.
But a long-run perspective is equally useful for understanding the seasons
of light. History illustrates how governments have used sovereign debt to
shape economic and political development. It shows how they have used it to
help build lasting states, provide public goods and complete infrastructure
projects. Historical experience sheds light on how sovereign debt evolved into
a safe asset, as governments have sought to render it more attractive to invest
ors and, in the course of so doing, underpin the financial system.
We thank Chengyu Huang for excellent research assistance and Carlos Alvaréz-Nogal, Michael Bordo,
Mark De Broeck, Christophe Chamley, Marc Flandreau and Kenneth Rogoff for helpful comments.
We also thank Ali Abbas, Alex Pienkowski and participants at the IMF conference on Sovereign Debt
(September 13–14, 2018) for useful suggestions. Additional information on the data used here can be
found in our IMF working paper by the same name.
1 In what follows, we focus on the debt of national (central, federal) governments and not those of
state governments, local governments and parastatals except where the latter have been explicitly
assumed by the national government.
Barry Eichengreen, Asmaa El-Ganainy, Rui Pedro Esteves, and Kris James Mitchener., Public Debt through the Ages
In: Sovereign Debt. Edited by S. Ali Abbas, Alex Pienkowski, and Kenneth Rogoff, Oxford University Press (2020).
© International Monetary Fund.
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198850823.003.0002
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
History does not always unfold at the same pace, and the same is true of
this chapter. In its first half (Sections 2–4) we review two millennia of debt
history in an effort to recover the origins of sovereign borrowing. In the
second half (Sections 5–7), we focus on the most recent century of sovereign
debt history, with its more direct implications for contemporary policy-
makers. Finally, Section 8 concludes.
2 Removing the polity from the borrowing equation and replacing it with a single sovereign ruler
simplifies the institutional requirements, since the contract can be written between an individual and
the sovereign’s creditors.
3 This was the annual tax of one penny from every English householder having land of a certain
value paid to the Papal See from Anglo-Saxon times until it was discontinued in 1534 following King
Henry VIII’s break with Rome.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
Church needed a way of paying the troops of its Italian allies. The solution
of its Tuscan bankers was to anticipate income from Church property and
religious dues. The Church encouraged banking firms to incorporate as joint
stock companies as a way of stabilizing this early form of financial intermedi-
ation. These new banking firms had legal personalities that were independent
of their investors. They had transferable shares. This new corporate form
enabled them to increase their capital base and expand their lending capacity
by selling shares and attracting deposits from wealthy individuals (Padgett
2012). They used the resulting income to grant advances to the Church.
This papal model was then emulated by the city-states of the Italian
Peninsula.4 Debt contracts took the form of annuities called “rentes” and
“renten.” These specified that lenders would receive a stream of interest pay-
ments over their lifetimes or in perpetuity, with the principal never repaid.
Perpetuities were liquid because the stream of payments was not tied to the
original lender.5 They formed the embryo of a permanent stock of public
debt, since perpetual annuities could only be redeemed if the city raised
sufficient revenue to repay the principal, which was the exception to the rule.
(Life annuities, as noted, expired instead with the death of the original pur-
chaser.) A further advantage of perpetual annuities was that they allowed
lenders to circumvent religious doctrine on usury; since perpetuities never
had to be repaid, theologians regarded them as legitimate contracts under
which one party purchased a stream of future income from the other.6
The marketability of perpetual annuities created the conditions for the
emergence of secondary markets, first locally, then nationally and finally inter-
nationally.7 Negotiability transformed these securities into what was in effect a
public financial good. Investors regarded these government debt instruments
as safe, liquid, and therefore eligible as collateral in over-the-counter markets.
Although it is uncertain when sovereign debt was first used as collateral, by the
end of the early modern period (the sixteenth through eighteenth centuries)
it had become the dominant form of collateral for short-term credit in Europe.8
By expanding the collateral space, government annuities contributed to the
4 Albeit from the unpromising start of “forced loans” raised to deal with military emergencies.
Munro (2013) describes how this innovation spread to other European polities.
5 Owing to this liquidity, they bore lower yields than lifetime annuities.
6 The final theological settlement of the issue was arrived at in the fifteenth century. It added add
itional conditions for the legitimacy of perpetual annuities; however, it turned out these were easier to
circumvent than the initial prohibition against interest from mutuum (Munro 2013).
7 Sovereign debt was initially marketed to foreigners by the County of Holland in the sixteenth
century (Neal 2015).
8 De Luca (2008) documents how city bonds were preferred as pledges in collateralized loans (censi
consegnativi) in Milan in the late sixteenth century.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 01/10/19, SPi
9 This view is consistent with Alesina and Spolaore (2003), who argue that extreme fragmentation
and decentralization on the one hand and excessive consolidation and centralization of state power on
the other are both likely to be inefficient. Europe in this period can be seen as moving away from
extreme fragmentation but not (yet) to excessive centralization (although problems of fractionaliza-
tion remained, as we recount below when describing the Dutch experience).
10 These observations are consistent with empirical and theoretical work suggesting the existence
of a positive relationship between financial development and a state’s ability to tax (Besley and
Persson 2009).
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
en lo concert de la vida, pujá sens casi deturarse las escalas de sa
casa, dihent á la minyona tan bon punt li obrí la porta del pis:
Ella que may havia estat ambiciosa ¡cóm sentia no tenir major
fortuna pera disposar, més talent pera aplicarhi, més número de
relacions socials pera ésser útil á la nova Associació en que anava á
entrar!… Pero per més que en alas del seu desitj sentia ja bullir en sa
imaginació un sens fí de plans y de projectes, pensant que en aquells
moments lo que més la interessava, era veure ab lo que podia
comptar pera portar las seuas il·lusions al terreno de la práctica,
comensá á resseguir las planas del seu Dietari, ahont després de
diferentas combinacions numéricas y cálculs de tota mena y d’haver
passat un rigurós exámen á cada un dels reguerons per ahont
s’escorren las imprescindibles necessitats de cada dia, fent una petita
incisió á lo menos apremiant y fins lo sacrifici d’algun accessori en lo
refinament del seu bon gust, la Montserrat ab una interna satisfacció
que saborejava per la primera volta de sa vida, tragué victoriosament
las cuatre pessetas mensuals que ella cregué en conciencia, que
donada sa modestíssima posició necessitava pera esser sócia de las
Conferencias. Es clar que faltavan los extraordinaris, pero tantas
voltas en aquell dia havia sentit parlar de la miraculosa ajuda del cel
en las obras bonas, que no vacilá un moment en creure que, ja en
posició de lo més apremiant, Deu li inspiraría la manera de suplir ab
son ingeni y bona voluntat lo que no li fos possible donar en
metálich.
Apesar d’ésser al cor del hivern, las salas estavan sens encatifar, los
balcons sense cortinatjes, las entradas sense portiers y los finestrons
fortament tancats. En lo menjador y en las duas cambras de la part
del darrera, únichs punts de la casa en que s’hi veyan senyals de vida,
també s’hi trobavan á faltar aquella pulcritut y carregament
d’adornos que tant encisava á don Joaquim. Allí hi havia posadas las
catifas de moqueta, pero’ls gerros estavan sense flors, lo piano
tancat, lo musiquero buyt de partituras; per totas aquellas salas s’hi
notava un cert ayre de tristesa, que invadia fins la cambra de las
noyas y lo quarto d’en Felip, en quals llits s’endevinava que feya
llarch temps que ningú hi havia dormit…
Los aucells joves que tanta vida y animació escampavan entorn seu,
cada hu per motius diferents havia abandonat aquell niu, ab tant dalé
fabricat.
Estava certa de que’l seu pare, ab son criteri per aquestas cosas, se
faria cárrech de que no es possible abandonar los interessos.
Donya Francisqueta girá donchs los ulls entorn seu y’s trobá sola:
pero en Bach li havia tan dit sempre que ab diners se tenia tot, que la
pobre dona ab las mans plenas de bitllets de Banch, cercava y
cercava, sens que se li acudís lo que tenia de fer pera salvar lo
conflicte que li havia caygut á sobre.
—¡Ay, ja’l tinch! ¡ja’l tinch! ¡Aquest si que hi anirá! ¡En Francesch
que tinguerem d’aprenent quan los noys eran petits! Aquest que feya
tants anys que no havia estat á casa y que desde que va sapiguer que
estavas malalt, ha vingut tots los diumenges! ¡Tan honrat, tan bo!
¡Ell lo fará’l sacrifici de deixar sa casa per nosaltres y sobretot se
mirará’l noy ab interés! N’ estich certa… n’estich certa.
—Senyora ¡un parte! ¡un parte! ¡Tal volta diuhen que no hi pujin!
¡que está mellor!
La pobre mare no sabia’l francés, pero tan bon punt obrí’l parte,
comprengué de sobte lo mot que deya mort; y llansant un crit,
caygué en terra, presa d’un fort accident nerviós.
En Bach ab los ulls que li saltavan del cap, sens poguer llegir lo paper
que la seua dona tenia estretament tancat en sas mans, pero
endevinant de sobres lo seu contingut, torná altra volta á sos crits
estridents, que’ls criats escoltaren ab la indiferencia de la gent
mercenaria, y als que donya Francisqueta ja no podia respondre per
haberla portada á pes de brassos á un dels llits de las salas del
devant.
De moment, los vehins ompliren la casa. Quan los coneguts
sapigueren la nova, molts hi anaren; alguns se retragueren dihent
que una volta que la senyora era al llit, esperarian que’s posés mellor;
altres deixaren tarjetas; y al poch temps aquella professó de gent
estranya que pujava la escala ab un ayre indiferent, que procurava fer
compungit en l’instant que trucava á la porta ó allargava la má á don
Joaquím pera repetirli com fetas ab un mateix patró, las paraulas que
havia dit lo company que acabava de sortir, aná aclarintse fins á
tornar á deixar en sa trista buydor, la espayosa casa del antich
mantegayre.
Mes passats alguns dias, una tarde com donya Francisqueta hagués
ja menjat una mica y’s trobés bastant millorada, aprofitant una de las
moltas estonas en que la seua cambrera la deixava sola, se vestí com
pogué y tirantse l’edredon dessobre de las espatllas, tot agafantse per
las parets, arribá fins al quarto d’en Bach, qui al véurela llensá una
mena de alarit d’alegría.
Apesar de que’l metje, comprenent la seua ansietat, cada dia li havia
donat l’asseguransa de que la malaltía de la seua esposa era un
accident, tan sols agravat pe’l dolor reuma y per la estremada fredor
del hivern, aquell marit, que durant tot lo temps de son matrimoni,
s’havia acostumat á veure en la seua dona una mena de maniquí, al
qu’ell tenia la creencia de que li donava vida y acció, y que á bon
segur sis anys enrera hauria pogut desapareixer de la familia sens
que li hagués semblat que perdia cosa d’importancia; durant aquells
dias en que havia pensat que se li podia morir ó tal volta quedar en la
trista situació en que ell se trobava, la seua pena havia estat tant
fonda, que al véurela entrar en lo seu quarto, demacrada y envellida,
pero caminant per sos propis peus, li dirigí la més tendra y amorosa
mirada, que la encongida muller havia rebut del seu espós durant sa
llarga vida matrimonial. Mes la desolada mare, sens adonarse del
lloch que per tant tristos aconteixements adquiria en lo cor de’n
Bach, tan bon punt lo vegé y contemplá aquell quadro de tristesa y
soletat, avivántseli en la imaginació la persistent idea d’aquell fill,
mort lluny dels pares, assistit per gent estranya ó tal volta sense
ningú que li aixugués la suor, ni acostés á sos llavis assedegats una
sola gota de cordial, esclatá en un mar de llágrimas, més abundosas
com més s’esforsava pera contenirlas, y tambalejant arribá fins á en
Bach, li tirá’ls brassos al coll y flaquejantli las camas aná lliscant en
terra, fins á amagar sa cara banyada ab plors dessobre’ls genolls del
seu marit.
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.