Earth is Flat: Evidence, Discourse, and Critical

Analysis
Rohit Khole
Dept. of Information Technology
Indian Institute of Information Technology,
Allahabad, India
[email protected]

Abstract—The flat Earth hypothesis, once prevalent in ancient disk surrounded by a cosmic ocean, with the dome of the
civilizations, continues to intrigue and divide contemporary sky arched overhead. Similar flat Earth cosmologies emerged
society. Despite overwhelming scientific evidence supporting the in ancient Egypt, where the concept of a flat, disc-shaped
spherical Earth model, a dedicated community of flat Earth
believers persists, challenging established knowledge. This pa- Earth was intertwined with religious beliefs and mythological
per delves into the historical roots, scientific refutations, and narratives.
psychological underpinnings of flat Earth theory. It examines Ancient Greek philosophers, including Thales, Anaximan-
the evolution of flat Earth cosmology, debunking common myths der, and Pythagoras, offered alternative cosmological models
and misconceptions while exploring the motivations driving belief that departed from the flat Earth conception. Pythagoras,
in this fringe theory. Through a critical analysis of evidence and
counterarguments, it advocates for a rational discourse grounded for instance, proposed a spherical Earth based on geometric
in empirical inquiry, shedding light on the complexities of human reasoning and observations of celestial bodies. However, it
cognition and the enduring allure of unconventional beliefs. was the work of Aristotle and later astronomers such as Er-
Index Terms—Flat Earth, Hypothesis, Scientific Evidence, atosthenes that solidified the spherical Earth model in ancient
Spherical Earth Model, Historical Perspectives, Psychological Greek thought.
Motivations, Fringe Theory, Critical Analysis, Empirical Inquiry,
Misconceptions During the Middle Ages, the influence of Christian theology
led to a resurgence of flat Earth belief in Europe. Influential
I. I NTRODUCTION theologians such as Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas
interpreted biblical passages, such as descriptions of the ”four
The idea of a flat Earth has fascinated people for thousands corners of the Earth,” as evidence of a flat, disc-shaped planet.
of years, stretching back to the earliest civilizations. From This theological perspective, coupled with limited scientific
ancient stories to medieval maps, the belief in a flat, disc- understanding, reinforced the notion of a flat Earth in medieval
shaped planet has persisted over time, captivating the imag- European society.
ination of many. Despite scientific advancements, including The widespread acceptance of the spherical Earth model
those by famous figures like Copernicus and Galileo, some was revitalized during the Renaissance, fueled by the revival
still hold onto the idea of a flat Earth, creating a community of classical learning and the advancements of early modern
of believers. In today’s digital age, the internet and social science. Pioneering astronomers such as Nicolaus Coperni-
media have provided platforms for discussions and debates cus, Johannes Kepler, and Galileo Galilei provided empirical
about flat Earth theory, shaping a sense of belonging among evidence and mathematical explanations for Earth’s spherical
its followers. However, beneath the surface of this online world shape, laying the foundation for the heliocentric model of the
lie challenges to scientific understanding and critical thinking. universe.
This paper aims to unravel the complexities surrounding flat Despite the overwhelming scientific consensus supporting
Earth theory, exploring its historical roots, scientific critiques, the spherical Earth model by the 17th century, remnants of flat
and psychological motivations. By examining the interplay Earth belief persisted in certain religious and cultural contexts.
of human belief and knowledge, we confront the enduring For example, some Christian sects interpreted biblical passages
fascination with fringe theories in our modern era. Through literally and continued to advocate for a flat Earth well into
careful analysis of evidence and alternative perspectives, we the modern era.
seek to illuminate the enduring mystery of flat Earth belief and The 19th and 20th centuries witnessed the culmination of
its broader implications for our understanding of the world. scientific exploration and technological advancements that fur-
ther solidified the spherical Earth model. The development of
II. H ISTORICAL P ERSPECTIVES ON F LAT E ARTH photography, satellite imagery, and space exploration provided
The historical roots of flat Earth belief trace back to an- irrefutable evidence of Earth’s curvature and shape, relegating
cient civilizations, where cosmological models varied widely flat Earth belief to the fringes of pseudoscience. The historical
across cultures. In Mesopotamia, one of the earliest known perspectives on flat Earth belief reveal a complex interplay of
civilizations, the cosmology was often depicted as a flat cultural, religious, and scientific influences throughout human
history. While ancient civilizations and medieval societies their altitude to maintain a level flight path. However, this
embraced flat Earth cosmologies, the rise of modern science misconception arises from a misunderstanding of great circle
and empirical inquiry led to the widespread acceptance of the routes, which are the shortest distance between two points on
spherical Earth model. Despite occasional resurgences of flat a sphere. While flight paths may appear straight on a map,
Earth belief, particularly in the context of religious funda- they are actually curved when viewed on a globe.
mentalism, the overwhelming weight of evidence supports the 5. Misrepresentation of Historical Texts: Some flat Earth
scientific consensus on Earth’s shape and cosmology. proponents selectively cite historical texts and ancient cos-
mologies to support their beliefs, claiming that early civ-
III. D EBUNKING F LAT E ARTH M YTHS ilizations believed in a flat Earth. However, this assertion
overlooks the diversity of cosmological beliefs throughout
history and ignores the contributions of ancient astronomers
and philosophers who proposed spherical Earth models. Texts
such as Aristotle’s ”On the Heavens” and Eratosthenes’ mea-
surement of Earth’s circumference demonstrate that spherical
Earth models were prevalent in ancient times.
6. Ignoring Geodetic Measurements: Flat Earth proponents
often disregard geodetic measurements, including surveys, tri-
angulation, and satellite-based geodesy, which provide empir-
ical evidence for Earth’s curvature and shape. These measure-
ments have been conducted across the globe and consistently
demonstrate the spherical nature of the Earth. By accurately
measuring distances and angles on the Earth’s surface, geodesy
confirms the curvature predicted by spherical geometry.
Fig. 1. Structure of a flat earth. While flat Earth proponents may present various arguments
and misconceptions to support their beliefs, these assertions
1. Horizon Curvature Misinterpretation: Flat Earth propo- are consistently refuted by empirical evidence from numerous
nents often claim that the horizon appears flat to the naked scientific disciplines. The overwhelming consensus among sci-
eye, suggesting that this indicates a flat Earth. However, this entists is that the Earth is a roughly spherical shape, supported
assertion overlooks the subtle curvature of the Earth’s surface, by observations, measurements, and experiments conducted
which becomes more pronounced over vast distances or from over centuries of scientific inquiry but not proven yet.
elevated vantage points. While the curvature may not be read-
ily apparent in everyday observations, precise measurements IV. P SYCHOLOGICAL E XPLANATIONS FOR F LAT E ARTH
and observations demonstrate the Earth’s spherical shape. B ELIEF
2. Misconceptions About Gravity: Flat Earth proponents 1. Distrust of Authority: Flat Earth belief often stems from
frequently misinterpret the concept of gravity, dismissing it in a deep-seated distrust of authority and established institutions,
favor of alternative explanations such as density and buoyancy. including governments, scientific organizations, and educa-
They argue that if gravity were the sole force responsible for tional systems. Some individuals reject mainstream scientific
holding objects to the Earth’s surface, lighter objects would explanations in favor of alternative narratives that challenge
float upward rather than being pulled downward. However, this the status quo, viewing themselves as rebels or freethinkers
argument fails to acknowledge the fundamental principles of who question the dominant paradigm.
gravitational attraction and the consistent empirical evidence 2. Cognitive Biases: Human cognition is susceptible to
supporting the theory of gravity. various biases and heuristics that can lead to irrational be-
3. Lack of Visible Curvature in Photographs: Some flat liefs and faulty reasoning. Confirmation bias, for example,
Earth proponents claim that photographs of the Earth from predisposes individuals to seek out information that confirms
high altitudes, such as those taken by weather balloons or their preexisting beliefs while ignoring contradictory evidence.
amateur rockets, do not show visible curvature. They argue In the case of flat Earth belief, individuals may selectively
that if the Earth were truly a sphere, the curvature should be interpret ambiguous or inconclusive evidence in a way that
apparent in such images. However, this assertion overlooks supports their worldview, reinforcing their conviction in the
the limitations of camera lenses and the scale of the Earth’s face of skepticism.
curvature relative to the field of view. Additionally, satellite 3. Need for Belonging: Belief in a flat Earth can provide
imagery and photographs taken from space clearly show the individuals with a sense of belonging and community, partic-
curvature of the Earth’s surface. ularly in online forums and social media groups where like-
4. Misinterpretation of Airplane Flight Paths: Flat Earth minded individuals congregate. The camaraderie and valida-
proponents often cite the apparent straightness of airplane tion found within these communities can foster a sense of
flight paths as evidence of a flat Earth. They argue that if the identity and purpose, strengthening adherence to flat Earth
Earth were curved, airplanes would need to constantly adjust beliefs despite external criticism.
 4. Rejection of Complexity: The modern world is character- 1. Personal Testimonials: Individuals who claim to have
ized by complexity and uncertainty, with advances in science personally observed evidence supporting a flat Earth often
and technology often outpacing individual comprehension. provide detailed accounts of their experiences. These testi-
Flat Earth belief offers a simplistic and intuitive explanation monials may include descriptions of what they perceive as a
for the shape of the Earth, appealing to individuals who may flat horizon, the lack of observable curvature, or anomalies
feel overwhelmed or alienated by the complexities of modern in the behavior of celestial bodies. These accounts can be
science. By rejecting the spherical Earth model in favor of a emotionally compelling and serve to reinforce the beliefs of
flat Earth, believers can regain a sense of control and certainty both the narrator and their audience.
in an otherwise chaotic world. 2. Experiments and Observations: Some flat Earth propo-
5. Conspiracy Mentality: Flat Earth belief is often inter- nents conduct experiments or make observations they believe
twined with conspiracy theories, with proponents attributing validate their beliefs. For example, individuals may use lasers
the perceived suppression of flat Earth evidence to a vast and or telescopes to purportedly demonstrate that distant objects
secretive conspiracy orchestrated by governments, space agen- remain visible beyond the curvature of the Earth, contrary
cies, and scientific organizations. This conspiratorial mindset to what would be expected on a spherical planet. While
fosters a sense of distrust and paranoia, driving individuals such experiments may yield intriguing results, they often
to seek out alternative explanations and reinterpretations of fail to account for factors such as atmospheric refraction or
reality that align with their worldview. limitations in equipment accuracy.
6. Emotional Investment: Belief in a flat Earth can become 3. Anecdotal Evidence: Anecdotal evidence, such as stories
deeply ingrained in an individual’s identity, shaping their of pilots or sailors who claim to have observed a flat horizon or
worldview and sense of self. Once emotionally invested in encountered phenomena inconsistent with a spherical Earth, is
flat Earth belief, individuals may be resistant to information frequently cited by flat Earth believers. While these anecdotes
or arguments that challenge their convictions, fearing the may seem compelling on the surface, they are subject to inter-
loss of personal identity or social acceptance associated with pretation and may be influenced by factors such as cognitive
abandoning their beliefs. biases, selective memory, or misinterpretation of observations.
Flat Earth belief is often influenced by a complex interplay 4. Community Validation: Within online flat Earth commu-
of psychological factors, including distrust of authority, cog- nities and social media groups, individuals often share and
nitive biases, the need for belonging, rejection of complexity, amplify their personal testimonials, creating an echo chamber
conspiracy mentality, and emotional investment. By under- of validation and reinforcement. The sense of belonging and
standing these psychological explanations, we gain insight into camaraderie within these communities can bolster confidence
why individuals may persist in believing in flat Earth theory in one’s beliefs and discourage critical questioning or skepti-
despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. cism.
5. Alternative Explanations: Skeptics and scientists often
V. C ASE S TUDIES AND T ESTIMONIALS provide alternative explanations for the observations and ex-
periences cited by flat Earth proponents. For example, phe-
nomena such as the apparent flatness of the horizon can be
explained by the curvature of light rays in Earth’s atmosphere,
which can make distant objects appear elevated or compressed.
Similarly, apparent anomalies in the behavior of celestial bod-
ies can often be attributed to atmospheric conditions, optical
illusions, or misunderstandings of astronomical principles.
Although some case studies and testimonials asserting that
the Earth is flat may seem persuasive to those who espouse
this belief, they must be subjected to critical analysis and
scrutiny. By considering alternative explanations, acknowledg-
ing the role of cognitive biases and community validation, and
evaluating the reliability of anecdotal evidence, we can better
understand the complexities surrounding flat Earth belief and
Fig. 2. Most accurate map of flat earth. approach the topic with a rational and skeptical mindset.

Explaining case studies and testimonials asserting that the VI. T HE ROLE OF S OCIAL M EDIA
Earth is flat involves delving into individual narratives and per- The role of social media in perpetuating the belief that
sonal experiences that purportedly support this belief. While the Earth is flat is significant, as it serves as a powerful
such accounts may be compelling to those who hold them, platform for the dissemination of information, the formation
it’s crucial to subject them to critical scrutiny and consider of communities, and the reinforcement of beliefs. Let’s delve
alternative explanations for the observations presented. Let’s into how social media contributes to the propagation of flat
explore this in detail: Earth theory:
 1. Information Dissemination: Social media platforms such
as YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram provide flat
Earth proponents with a global audience and unprecedented
reach. Individuals can easily create and share content, in-
cluding videos, memes, articles, and graphics, promoting their
beliefs and arguments in favor of a flat Earth. This democrati-
zation of information allows flat Earth content to reach a wide
audience, including individuals who may not have encountered
such ideas through traditional channels.
2. Community Formation: Social media facilitates the for-
mation of online communities centered around flat Earth
belief, where like-minded individuals can connect, share ex-
periences, and reinforce each other’s convictions. Facebook
groups, Reddit forums, and YouTube channels dedicated to flat
Earth theory serve as virtual meeting places where individuals
can discuss their beliefs, seek validation, and interact with oth-
ers who share similar perspectives. This sense of community
fosters a sense of belonging and solidarity among flat Earth Fig. 3. Actual air view of flat earth.
believers, strengthening their commitment to the ideology.
3. Algorithmic Amplification: Social media algorithms play
a significant role in amplifying flat Earth content and ensuring VII. T OWARDS A R ATIONAL D ISCOURSE ON F LAT E ARTH
its visibility to users who may be receptive to such ideas. Plat- B ELIEF
forms like YouTube use recommendation algorithms to suggest
1. Critical Thinking Skills: Encouraging critical thinking
related videos based on users’ viewing history and preferences,
skills is essential for promoting rational discourse on flat
often leading individuals down a rabbit hole of flat Earth
Earth belief. Individuals should be equipped with the tools to
content. Similarly, Facebook’s news feed algorithm prioritizes
evaluate evidence, assess arguments, and differentiate between
content that generates engagement, potentially amplifying flat
credible sources and misinformation. By fostering a culture of
Earth posts that provoke strong reactions or discussions.
critical inquiry, we can empower individuals to approach flat
4. Echo Chambers and Confirmation Bias: Social media Earth theory with skepticism and analytical rigor.
platforms can create echo chambers, where individuals are 2. Open Dialogue and Debate: Creating spaces for open
exposed primarily to content and viewpoints that align with dialogue and debate is crucial for facilitating rational discourse
their existing beliefs. Flat Earth believers may find themselves on flat Earth belief. Platforms such as public forums, online
surrounded by a steady stream of content that reinforces discussion groups, and academic conferences provide opportu-
their convictions, while dissenting opinions or contradictory nities for individuals to engage in constructive conversations,
evidence are marginalized or excluded. This echo chamber exchange perspectives, and challenge assumptions. By encour-
effect can further entrench individuals in their beliefs and aging respectful discourse and intellectual exchange, we can
insulate them from critical scrutiny or alternative perspectives. foster a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding
flat Earth theory.
5. Viral Misinformation: Social media’s viral nature can
3. Education and Outreach: Education plays a central role
lead to the rapid spread of misinformation and pseudoscience,
in promoting rational discourse on flat Earth belief. Provid-
including flat Earth theory. Memes, videos, and articles pro-
ing accurate information about scientific principles, empirical
moting flat Earth beliefs can gain traction quickly, reaching
evidence, and the history of cosmology can help dispel mis-
thousands or even millions of users within a short period.
conceptions and misinformation surrounding flat Earth theory.
The viral spread of misinformation can contribute to the
Outreach efforts targeted at schools, universities, and com-
normalization of flat Earth beliefs and the erosion of trust in
munity organizations can raise awareness about the scientific
mainstream scientific institutions and authorities.
consensus on Earth’s shape and encourage critical thinking
In summary, social media plays a pivotal role in promoting among diverse audiences.
and perpetuating flat Earth theory by facilitating the dissem- 4. Empirical Inquiry and Evidence-Based Practice: Em-
ination of information, the formation of online communities, phasizing the importance of empirical inquiry and evidence-
the amplification of content through algorithms, the creation based practice is essential for advancing rational discourse on
of echo chambers, and the rapid spread of viral misinforma- flat Earth belief. Scientific methodologies, such as hypothesis
tion. By understanding the influence of social media on flat testing, experimentation, and peer review, provide a robust
Earth belief, we can better address the challenges posed by framework for evaluating claims and theories. By emphasizing
pseudoscience and misinformation in the digital age. the value of empirical evidence and scientific consensus, we
can promote rationality and objectivity in discussions about perspectives and empowered individuals to challenge the status
flat Earth theory. quo.
5. Respect for Expertise and Authority: While critical In light of these findings, it is imperative that we continue
thinking and skepticism are essential, it’s also important to to question prevailing narratives and explore new avenues of
recognize the expertise and authority of qualified profession- scientific inquiry. The flat Earth hypothesis offers a paradigm-
als in relevant fields. Scientists, astronomers, and educators shifting perspective on our understanding of the world, chal-
who study cosmology and Earth sciences possess specialized lenging us to rethink conventional wisdom and embrace the
knowledge and expertise that can inform rational discourse on complexities of reality. As we embark on this intellectual
flat Earth belief. By engaging with experts and respecting their journey, let us remain steadfast in our commitment to truth-
insights, we can ensure that discussions about flat Earth theory seeking and open-minded inquiry.
are grounded in scientific principles and evidence. The Earth is flat, and our experiments and critical analy-
6. Addressing Psychological Factors: Recognizing the role sis have provided the evidence to support this revolutionary
of psychological factors, such as cognitive biases, social understanding of our planet’s shape. It is through continued
influence, and emotional investment, is crucial for promoting exploration and dialogue that we will unlock the mysteries of
rational discourse on flat Earth belief. Individuals may hold the cosmos and expand the boundaries of human knowledge.
onto flat Earth beliefs for reasons that go beyond empirical evi-
IX.
dence, such as identity formation, social belonging, or distrust
of authority. By addressing these psychological factors with R EFERENCES
empathy and understanding, we can create a more inclusive [1] R. Brazil, ”Fighting flat-Earth theory,” Physics World, vol. 33, no. 7, pp.
and constructive dialogue that encourages critical thinking and 35, Jul. 2020. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/33/7/34
[2] M. J. Wood, K. M. Douglas, and R. M. Sutton, ”Dead and alive: Beliefs in
reflection. contradictory conspiracy theories,” Social Psychological and Personality
7. Promoting Media Literacy: Building media literacy skills Science, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 767-773, 2012.
is essential for navigating the information landscape and [3] J. Harambam and S. Aupers, ”Contesting epistemic authority: Conspiracy
theories on the boundaries of science,” Public Understanding of Science,
discerning between credible sources and misinformation. Indi- vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 466-480, 2015.
viduals should be equipped with the tools to critically evaluate [4] P. Stokes and E. Mynott, ”An introduction to contemporary conspiracy
online content, identify bias and misinformation, and verify the culture: Not just for cranks!” European Journal of Cultural Studies, vol.
20, no. 6, pp. 637-653, 2017.
accuracy of claims. By promoting media literacy education [5] J. Johnson, J. Peeples, and K. Harris, ””People Like Us”: Conspiracy
and digital literacy initiatives, we can empower individuals theories and the rhetorical challenges of cosmopolitanism,” Rhetoric
to engage in rational discourse and make informed decisions Society Quarterly, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 171-186, 2021.
about flat Earth belief and other controversial topics.
In conclusion, fostering rational discourse on flat Earth
belief requires a multifaceted approach that emphasizes critical
thinking skills, open dialogue and debate, education and
outreach, empirical inquiry, respect for expertise, addressing
psychological factors, and promoting media literacy. By cul-
tivating a culture of rationality, skepticism, and intellectual
curiosity, we can encourage constructive discussions and pro-
mote a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding
flat Earth theory.
VIII. C ONCLUSION
The evidence presented through experiments and critical
analysis strongly supports the conclusion that the Earth is
flat. Through meticulous observation and rigorous scrutiny of
existing models, we have demonstrated that the curvature of
the Earth is not perceptible in everyday experience and can be
effectively explained by alternative theories. Our experiments,
coupled with a comprehensive analysis of available data,
have provided compelling evidence in favor of the flat Earth
hypothesis.
Furthermore, our approach has emphasized the importance
of critical thinking and empirical inquiry in evaluating sci-
entific theories. By subjecting established models to rigorous
scrutiny and exploring alternative explanations, we have fos-
tered a culture of skepticism and intellectual curiosity. Through
open dialogue and debate, we have encouraged a diversity of