Get Current Concepts in Medical Research and Practice 1st Edition Mieczyslaw Pokorski (Eds.) Free All Chapters
Get Current Concepts in Medical Research and Practice 1st Edition Mieczyslaw Pokorski (Eds.) Free All Chapters
Get Current Concepts in Medical Research and Practice 1st Edition Mieczyslaw Pokorski (Eds.) Free All Chapters
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/current-
concepts-in-medical-research-and-
practice-1st-edition-mieczyslaw-pokorski-eds/
textbookfull
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-medicine-and-
medical-research-mieczyslaw-pokorski/
https://textbookfull.com/product/medical-and-biomedical-
updates-1st-edition-mieczyslaw-pokorski/
https://textbookfull.com/product/advances-in-biomedicine-
mieczyslaw-pokorski/
https://textbookfull.com/product/pulmonary-health-and-disorders-
mieczyslaw-pokorski/
Advancements and Innovations in Health Sciences
Mieczyslaw Pokorski
https://textbookfull.com/product/advancements-and-innovations-in-
health-sciences-mieczyslaw-pokorski/
https://textbookfull.com/product/respiratory-medicine-and-
science-1st-edition-mieczyslaw-pokorski-eds/
https://textbookfull.com/product/medical-surgical-nursing-
concepts-and-practice-3-edition-edition-dallred/
https://textbookfull.com/product/medical-surgical-nursing-
concepts-practice-susan-c-dewit/
https://textbookfull.com/product/biomaterials-in-clinical-
practice-advances-in-clinical-research-and-medical-devices-1st-
edition-fatima-zivic-et-al-eds/
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 1039
Neuroscience and Respiration
Current Concepts
in Medical
Research and
Practice
Advances in Experimental Medicine
and Biology
Neuroscience and Respiration
Volume 1039
Subseries Editor
Mieczyslaw Pokorski
More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/13457
Mieczyslaw Pokorski
Editor
Current Concepts in
Medical Research and
Practice
Editor
Mieczyslaw Pokorski
Opole Medical School
Opole, Poland
v
vi Preface
Mieczyslaw Pokorski
Contents
vii
viii Contents
Index . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Advs Exp. Medicine, Biology - Neuroscience and Respiration (2017) 36: 1–8
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_83
# Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Published online: 12 August 2017
Abstract
The use of electronic cigarettes or e-cigarettes is strongly on the rise. The
literature confirms that in the process of quitting smoking using an
electronic device dispensing nicotine should be a transitional stage before
the complete cessation of smoking. The aim of the present study was to
assess the popularity of e-cigarettes, the underlying reasons for use of such
nicotine products, and the level of awareness of health hazards associated
with e-cigarettes. The study is of a survey type. The material consisted of
data collected from an anonymous survey distributed among 46 female
and 23 male users of e-cigarettes in 2015. We used a questionnaire of our
own design. The findings demonstrate that the main reason for a recourse
to e-cigarettes is a desire to use fashionable technological innovations, and
the conviction that such cigarettes are less harmful than the traditional
tobacco products. Some respondents used e-cigarettes to quit smoking;
others to minimize the harmful effects of smoking. Most respondents
acquired information about e-cigarettes from friends or from the Internet.
There was a high awareness of the chemical composition of substances
contained in e-cigarettes. An interest in e-cigarettes is caused by an
increased knowledge on the negative effects of traditional smoking.
Currently, the e-cigarettes remains a technological novelty, so that the
exact health effects of their long-term use are open to conjecture.
1
2 A. Daniluk et al.
Keywords
Addiction • E-cigarettes • Health effect • Smoking cessation • Survey •
Tobacco smoking
often look for e-cigarettes having a pleasant fra- Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the study
grance, which counters some unpleasant side population
effects of smoking tobacco cigarettes, such as Age-group (year) Gender (Femal/Male; n)
smelly breath or stinky clothes. Users of < 18 1/0
e-cigarettes often report an improvement in 18–20 1/1
smoking-related symptoms such as shortness of 21–30 26/12
31–40 9/5
breath and cough, and point to having a better
41–50 4/2
chance of fighting the habit of smoking tradi-
51–60 3/3
tional cigarettes (Królikowski and Domagała-
> 60 2/0
Kulawik 2014). The e-cigarette is still a relative Education (n ¼ 69) (n)
novelty on the health-related market, so that the Primary school 2
long-term effects of using these devices are Vocational 4
mostly unsettled and are subject to intense High school 32
research. The present study seeks to define the University 31
level of e-cigarettes use in the general Polish
population, the motivations behind the switch
from smoking traditional cigarettes to Most of them indicated friends (62%); others
e-cigarettes, and the level of awareness of indicated the Internet (19%), television and press
e-cigarette smokers concerning the potential (6%). The majority of respondents (61%) stated
health risks. We addressed this issue across vari- that e-cigarettes were a better choice than tobacco
ous age-groups of smokers in a survey-type cigarettes. Eighty-seven percent smoked tobacco
study. cigarettes for 1 year up to 40 years before using
e-cigarettes. Sixty-one percent of respondents
had tried to quit smoking before using
2 Methods e-cigarettes. Sixty-one percent of respondents
smoked tobacco cigarettes but at the same time
The study material consisted of data collected they used innovative products with nicotine
from an anonymous questionnaire-based diag- e-liquids. Most respondents found e-cigarettes as
nostic survey. The questionnaire was of our fashionable and less harmful to health (Fig. 1). The
own design and it was designed according to respondents differed concerning the awareness
the principles described in relevant publications about health risks associated with the use of
(Babbie 2009). Data were collected from e-cigarettes. The opinion of the majority was that
69 respondents. The surveyed group comprised these devices were less harmful to health compared
46 women (67%) and 23 men (33%). The demo- to tobacco cigarettes (Fig. 2).
graphic characteristics of respondents are Many of the respondents, however, despite
presented in Table 1. The questionnaire was their being regular users of the devices, were
completed either on-line (9 individuals) or in unfamiliar with the exact chemical composition
person by customers shopping for e-cigarettes of e-liquids they inhaled in the vaporized form.
at stalls specializing in selling them, usually They used e-liquids containing from 6 to 18 mg
present in shopping malls (60 individuals). Data of nicotine per ml of fluid, although there are
were statistically elaborated with the help of a e-liquids containing higher concentrations of nic-
MS Excel spread sheet. otine available on the market. They used from
one to six containers of e-liquid per month, each
of 10 to 30 ml volume. Most of them declared the
3 Results financial savings they made through owing to the
use of e-cigarettes instead of tobacco cigarettes,
Respondents participating in the survey were asked ranging from about 15 to 100 euros per months.
about their source of knowledge on e-cigarettes. Respondents who completed questionnaires gave
4 A. Daniluk et al.
%
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Less health Reduced negative Lower price than Fashionable Others
harm effects of smoking that for tobacco novelty
perceived by others cigarettes
Fig. 2 Knowledge of %
respondents on health risks
45
associated with the use of
e-cigarettes
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
0
Safe for health Less harmful than As harmful as More harmful than
tobacco cigarettes tobacco cigarettes tobacco cigarettes
various reasons for the ban of smoking and cultural issues were rarely raised by the
e-cigarettes in public places. The majority of respondents as a reason to ban the e-cigarettes
them indicated the harmfulness of e-cigarettes (Fig. 3). The majority of the respondent also
as being comparable to that of passive smoking conceded that they knew the reasons why
of tobacco cigarettes. Psychological, esthetic, e-cigarettes should be banned (Fig. 4).
Electronic Cigarettes and Awareness of Their Health Effects 5
Fig. 3 Knowledge of %
respondents on the health 100
and otherwise effects of
chemical composition of 90
e-liquids in e-cigarettes 80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Harmful to Bad example Esthetic & cultural
non-smokers for others aspects
released during tobacco combustion. They do child and can negatively affect the development
inhale, however, other possibly toxic chemical of the circulatory system. It also leads to a rapid
substances contained in the e-liquid. increase in blood glucose level, which can result
Manufacturers of the e-liquids which are used in pancreatic disorders and the development of
in e-cigarettes claim that their products are effec- diabetes mellitus. A healthy body is usually able
tive in quitting tobacco smoking, and are much to cope with such fluctuations, unlike the body of
safer for health. Studies that have so far been the developing child (Chivers et al. 2016;
conducted show large differences in reported Holbrook 2016). The currently observed level
results. For example, some researchers have of dependence on e-cigarettes is much lower
found e-cigarettes to be safe products, but others than that of tobacco cigarettes. This is attributed,
show that e-cigarettes can be harmful to health among other things, to the different rates at
and even carcinogenic because e-liquids, apart which nicotine is released into the bloodstream.
from nicotine, contain other chemicals that are Nicotine from traditional cigarettes penetrates
heated to a temperature of 200 C. For instance, into the bloodstream in less than 5 min. The
vaporized e-liquid contains traces of carcino- penetration time for nicotine from e-cigarettes
genic formaldehyde and acrolein (Golli et al. is longer than that, but still shorter compared to
2016). Little is known about the chemicals chewing gum containing nicotine, which is about
contained in e-liquids. Certainly, the symptoms 25 min. Substances contained in the vapor pro-
of nicotine dependence are also observed in users duced by e-cigarettes include nicotine at varying
of e-cigarettes, although they are less pro- concentrations, which is an addictive psychoac-
nounced than in tobacco smokers (Rostron et al. tive substance. Therefore, e-cigarettes are also
2016). addictive, but it is widely believed that the level
Nicotine contained in e-liquids affects the of this dependence is low (Kaisar et al. 2016;
sympathetic nervous system by increasing Sanders-Jackson et al. 2016).
blood pressure, accelerating heart rate, and The emergence of a new product replacing
increasing oxygen consumption by the myocar- tobacco cigarettes has stimulated many different
dium. This may also contribute to the narrowing opinions regarding their positive or negative
of coronary arteries, and consequently reduce impact on the body of dependent users. Research
blood flow (Bandiera et al. 2016). Unfortunately, carried out to date does not allow for a conclusive
information about the toxicity of the vapor cre- assessment of the effects caused by the long-term
ated in e-cigarettes is still inconclusive. The lack use of e-cigarettes. Until this year, such a situa-
of standardized studies in this area makes it diffi- tion was facilitated by the lack of legislative
cult, even impossible, to compare products from solutions limiting the access of underage persons
different manufacturers in terms of their effects to such nicotine delivery devices. The results
on health (Orr 2014). Some manufacturers also obtained in the present study revealed a great
offer nicotine-free e-liquids. Nevertheless, popularity of e-cigarettes among residents of
chemicals contained in these fluids penetrate to the city of Szczecin in Poland. Respondents
the human body (Holbrook 2016; Li et al. 2016). participating in the survey acquired information
During pregnancy, smoking e-cigarettes is as about these devices mostly from friends, who
dangerous as smoking tobacco, since fetal cells themselves have probably used such products.
are very sensitive to any external factors (Chivers Their knowledge also came from the Internet,
et al. 2016). It cannot be claimed with absolute television, and newspapers. The majority of
certainty that e-cigarettes have a negative influ- respondents argued, in line with numerous but
ence on the development of a baby in the mostly non-scientific sources, that the e-cigarette
mother’s womb. However, a pregnant woman it is a better choice than the tobacco cigarette.
should be aware that everything that enters her Respondents reached for these products after a
body accumulates in the fetal body. The intake of period of addiction that ranged from 1 to
nicotine can cause endocrine disorders in the 40 years. Most of them had made unsuccessful
Electronic Cigarettes and Awareness of Their Health Effects 7
attempts to quit smoking before they started systems to satisfy the needs of a nicotine-
using e-cigarettes. Many respondents continued dependent body.
to smoke tobacco cigarettes but also vaped nico-
tine. Some smokers indicated a current fad as a Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflict of
reason for inhaling the chemical substances interest in relation to this article.
contained in e-liquids. Respondents differed in
terms of awareness about the health-related risks
associated with the use of e-cigarettes. Most of References
them argued that these products are less harmful
Aiche BO, Frishman WH (2016) E-cigarettes: questions
to health compared to tobacco cigarettes. Many
in the mist. Cardiol Rev 24(6):261–267
people, despite the regular use of novel Babbie E (2009) Basis for socio-research. PWN, Warsaw,
preparations, were unfamiliar with the chemical Poland (Article in Polish)
composition of the e-liquids they inhaled. A Bandiera FC, Loukas A, Wilkinson AV, Perry CL (2016)
Associations between tobacco and nicotine product
lower product purchase price is another reason
use and depressive symptoms among college students
given by many respondents in favor of using in Texas. Addict Behav 63:19–22
e-cigarettes. A study of Korzeniowska et al. Bold KW, Kong G, Cavallo DA, Camenga DR, Krishnan-
(2014) has revealed that as many as 96% of Sarin S (2016) Reasons for trying e-cigarettes and risk
of continued use. Pediatrics 138(3). doi:10.1542/peds.
respondents start using e-cigarettes due to their
2016-0895
lower cost compared to tobacco cigarettes. A Chatham-Stephens K, Law R, Taylor E, Kieszak S,
very alarming fact has been reported by Bold Melstrom P, Bunnell R, Wang B, Day H,
et al. (2016), namely that young people trying Apelberg B, Cantrell L, Foster H, Schier JG (2016)
Exposure calls to US poison centers involving
e-cigarettes are strongly predisposed to become
e-cigarettes and conventional cigarettes-September
heavy smokers. It is also disturbing that the age 2010-December 2014. J Med Toxicol 12(4):350–357
of e-cigarette users is decreasing (Hammig et al. Chivers LL, Hand DJ, Priest JS, Higgins ST (2016)
2016). That points to the need of developing E-cigarette use among women of reproductive age:
impulsivity, cigarette smoking status, and other risk
prevention campaigns and legislation aimed at
factors. Prev Med 92:126–134
limiting this negative trend in the population Golli NE, Dallagi Y, Rahali D, Rejeb I, Fazaa SE (2016)
(Bold et al. 2016; Richter et al. 2016). Poland Neurobehavioral assessment following e-cigarette
has introduced the law on the protection of public refill liquid exposure in adult rats. Toxicol Mech
Methods 26(6):435–442
health against the effects of tobacco use in July of
Hammig B, Daniel-Dobbs P, Blunt-Vinti H (2016) Elec-
2016, banning smoking tobacco, including inno- tronic cigarette initiation among minority youth in the
vative tobacco products and e-cigarettes in pub- United States. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 43
lic places. The law also enforces placing (3):306–310
Holbrook BD (2016) The effects of nicotine on human
information on the harmful effects of substances
fetal development. Birth Defects Res C Embryo
contained in e-cigarettes on the human body, and Today 108(2):181–192
prohibits selling these devices to persons under Kaisar MA, Prasad S, Liles T, Cucullo L (2016) A decade
age 18. The insufficient knowledge of the health of e-cigarettes: limited research unresolved safety
concerns. Toxicology 365:67–75
effects of e-cigarettes is stimulating further
Korzeniowska K, Cieślewicz A, Jabłecka A (2014) Why
research in this area. It seems necessary to ana- does one smoke electronic cigarettes? Farmacja
lyze in detail the composition of e-liquids avail- Współczesna 7:9–13. (Article in Polish)
able to consumers and each new e-liquid before Kośmider L, Knysak J, Goniewicz MŁ, Sobczak A (2012)
Electronic cigarette—a safe substitute for tobacco cig-
its launch on the market.
arette or a new threat? Przegl Lek 69(10):1084–1089.
In conclusion, the e-cigarette is a technologi- (Article in Polish)
cal novelty, so that the long-term health effects of Królikowski K, Domagała-Kulawik J (2014) E-cigarette:
e-cigarette smoking remain as yet unsettled. The facts and myths, personal observations. Pneumonol
Alergol Pol 82(1):74–75. (Article in Polish)
ban on smoking tobacco cigarettes in public
Li Q, Zhan Y, Wang L, Leischow SJ, Zeng DD (2016)
places changes the behavior of smokers and Analysis of symptoms and their potential associations
makes them search for other nicotine delivery with e-liquids’ components: a social media study.
8 A. Daniluk et al.
BMC Public Health 30:16–674. doi:10.1186/s12889- Views on electronic cigarette regulations and beliefs
016-3326-0 about the reasons for and against regulation. PLoS
Orr MS (2014) E-cigarettes in the USA: a summary of One 11(8):e0161124. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.
available toxicology data and suggestions for the 0161124
future. Tob Control 23(Suppl 2):18–22. doi:10.1136/ Volesky KD, Maki A, Scherf C, Watson LM, Cassol E,
tobaccocontrol-2013-051474 Villeneuve PJ (2016) Characteristics of e-cigarette
Payne JD, Orellana-Barrios M, Medrano-Juarez R, users and their perceptions of the benefits, harms and
Buscemi D, Nugent K (2016) Electronic cigarettes in risks of e-cigarette use: survey results from a conve-
the media. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 29(3):280–283 nience sample in Ottawa, Canada. Health Promot
Richter L, Pugh BS, Smith PH, Ball SA (2016) The Chronic Dis Prev Can 36(7):130–138
co-occurrence of nicotine and other substance use WHO (2009) Study Group on tobacco product regulation.
and addiction among youth and adults in the United WHO technical report series. https://whqlibdoc.who.
States: implications for research, practice, and policy. int/publications/2009/9789241209557_eng.pdf?
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 43(2):132–145 ua¼1. Accessed on 17 June 2017
Rostron BL, Schroeder MJ, Ambrose BK (2016) Depen- Zarobkiewicz M, Woźniakowski M, Sławiński M,
dence symptoms and cessation intentions among US Samborski P, Wawryk-Gawda E, Jodłowska-Je˛drych
adult daily cigarette, cigar, and e-cigarette users, B (2016) Analysis of polish internet retail sites offer-
2012–2013. BMC Public Health 16(1):814. doi:10. ing electronic cigarettes. Ann Nat Inst Hyg 67
1186/s12889-016-3510-2 (3):287–290
Sanders-Jackson A, Tan AS, Bigman CA, Mello S,
Niederdeppe J (2016) To regulate or not to regulate?
Advs Exp. Medicine, Biology - Neuroscience and Respiration (2017) 36: 9–17
DOI 10.1007/5584_2017_82
# Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Published online: 10 August 2017
Abstract
The occurrence of a second lung tumor after surgical removal of lung
cancer usually indicates a lung cancer metastasis, but sometimes a new
lesion proves to be a new primary lung cancer, i.e., metachronous lung
cancer. The goal of the present study was to conduct a clinical evaluation
of patients with metachronous lung cancer and lung cancer metastasis, and
to compare the early and distant outcomes of surgical treatment in both
cancer types. There were 26 age-matched patients with lung cancer
metastases and 23 patients with metachronous lung cancers, who
underwent a second lung cancer resection. We evaluated the histological
type of a resected cancer, the extent of thoracosurgery, the frequency of
early postoperative complications, and the probability of 5-year survival
after the second operation. The findings were that metachronous lung
cancer was adenocarcinoma in 52% of patients, with a different
histopathological pattern from that of the primary lung cancer in 74% of
patients. In both cancer groups, mechanical resections were the most
common surgery type (76% of all cases), with anatomical resections
such as segmentectomy, lobectomy, or pneumectomy being much rarer
9
10 A. Rzechonek et al.
Keywords
Histopathology • Lung cancer • Metachronous cancer • Metastasis • Non-
small cell lung cancer • Survival • Thoracic surgery • Tumor
Table 1 Demographics, histological diagnosis, stage, and the number of primary tumors in patients operated on due to
primary lung cancer metastasis (LCM) and metachronous lung cancer (MLC)
LCM (n ¼ 26) MLC (n ¼ 23)a
Age (year) 66.4 4.9 66.5 5.1
Range (year) 50–77 54–79
Men 16 (62%) 15 (65%)
Women 10 (38%) 8 (35%)
Adenocarcinoma 15 (58%) 12 (52%)
Squamous cell carcinoma 9 (35%) 6 (26%)
Other histological types 2 (8%) 5 (22%)
Stage I 16 (62%) 17 (74%)
Stage II 4 (15%) 3 (13%)
Stage III 3 (11.5%) 2 (9%)
Missing data on staging 3 (11.5%) 1 (4%)
T1 12 14
T2 10 8
T3 1 0
T4 1 1
Tx 2 0
N0 19 18
N1 2 2
N2 2 2
Missing data on N 3 3
1 tumor 20 (77%) 20 (87%)
2 tumors 6 (23%) 2 (9%)
Missing data on number of tumors 0 1
Cancer staging was performed according to Edge and Compton (2010)
a
All differences between MLC and LCM patients failed the test of significance at p < 0.05
12 A. Rzechonek et al.
Table 2 Surgical treatment in patients with primary lung cancer metastases (LCM) and metachronous lung cancer
(MLC)
LCM (n ¼ 26) MLC (n ¼ 23) p
Surgery type
Mechanical resection 18 (69%)a 19 (83%) ns
Segmentectomy 3 (11%) 1 (4%) ns
Lobectomy 2 (8%) 2 (9%) ns
Pneumectomy 1 (4%) 1 (4%) ns
Non-radical resection 2 (8%) 0 (0 %) ns
Surgery side
Right-sided surgery 10 (38%) 16 (70%)b 0.03
Left-sided surgery 16 (62%) 7 (30%)b 0.03
Lymph node N1 or N2 surgery
Resected 10 (38%) 11 (48%) ns
Non-resected 16 (62%) 12 (52%) ns
a
including one mechanical resection combined with radical segmental resection of a rib
b
significant difference between LCM and MCL groups, ns, non-significant difference
Fig. 1 (a) Wedge resection of tumor (green arrow) with 14, 13, and sometimes 12; (b) resected tumor tissue
a margin of lung parenchyma (yellow arrow). In the (green arrow), with a margin of lung parenchyma (yellow
resection area there usually are the lymph nodes of groups arrow)
Fig. 2 (a) Anatomical resection: postoperative loge with groups 11, 10, and the mediastinal nodes of group 7 (b)
Satynski clamp (yellow star) closing the bronchus stump Resected lung lobe with cancer foci (green arrow);
is seen in the left-hand part of the photograph. Anatomical atelectatic neighboring lung parenchyma (yellow arrow)
resection usually involves removal of the lymph nodes of
Metachronous Lung Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Effects of Surgical Treatment 13
independent groups of patients and the different cellular organization of cancer tissue,
Chi-squared test to compare features between compared with primary lung cancer, in
the groups such as histopathological changes, 17 patients (77%). In the remaining six patients
cancer stages, and surgical treatments. The metachronous cancer was histologically the same
Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to assess the as the primary tumor. However, since the
probability of patient survival, and the difference metachronous cancer appeared after more than
between the two survival curves was assessed 2 years from the detection and surgery of the
with the Mantel-Cox test. A Cox regression anal- primary tumor, it was considered metachronous.
ysis also was performed to determine the differ- The detailed data are presented in Table 3.
ence in patient survival with respect to clinical The median time elapsing from the resection
and pathological data. A p-value < 0.05 defined of a primary tumor to lung cancer metastasis
the statistically significant differences. Commer- resection was 24.5 months and it was signifi-
cial StatSoft v1.3 (Statsoft, Cracow, Poland) and cantly shorter than that elapsing from the resec-
GraphPad Prism v5.0 (La Jola, CA) statistical tion of a primary tumor to metachronous lung
packages were used for all data analysis. cancer resection, which was 49 months
( p < 0.05). The early results of surgical treat-
ment in patients treated for both lung cancer
3 Results metastasis and metachronous lung cancer were
similar (Table 4). The incidence of postoperative
Among 49 patients who underwent the second complications was noted in 31% patients with
resection of a lung cancer, metachronous cancer lung cancer metastasis and 30% patients with
was diagnosed in 23 (47%) of patients. A metachronous lung cancer.
histopathological examination revealed a
Table 3 Histological type of metachronous lung cancer and primary lung cancer in the same patient (n ¼ 23)
Metachronous cancer Primary cancer n
Squamous cell carcinomaa Squamous cell carcinoma 2
Mixed adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma 2
Adenocarcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma 4
Unspecified Squamous cell carcinoma 1
Large cell carcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma 1
Squamous cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma 3
Large cell carcinoma Adenocarcinoma 1
Adenocarcinomaa Adenocarcinoma 4
Adenocarcinoma Neuroendocrine carcinoid 1
Adenocarcinoma Large cell carcinoma 1
Adenocarcinoma Unspecified 2
Squamous cell carcinoma Unspecified 1
a
New tumor unraveled after more than 2 years from the previous cancerous episode; although histologically same, was
considered metachronous cancer; figures in bold depict these six histologically same cases
Table 4 Early postoperative complications in patients with primary lung cancer metastases (LCM) and metachronous
lung cancer (MLC)
Complication LCM (n ¼ 26) MLC (n ¼ 23)
Atelectasis caused by bronchial secretion 0 1 (4%)
Unexpandable lung 6 (23%) 3 (13%)
Cardiac arrhythmias and circulatory insufficiency 1 (4%) 2 (9%)
Bleeding into the post-treatment chamber 1 (4%) 1 (4%)
14 A. Rzechonek et al.
Survival (%)
(MLC) 60
50.9%
40
20 LCM
MLC
0
0 20 40 60 80
Age (years)
Table 5 Prognostic factors in patients with metachronous lung cancer (MLC) – univariate Cox regression analysis.
Risk factor RR (95%CI) p
Size of metachronous lung cancer 0.99 (0.93–1.06) 0.81
Localization: Intrapulmonary or subpleural 0.80 (0.19–3.35) 0.76
Co-morbidities 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.67
Age of patient 0.93 (0.82–1.05) 0.26
RR (95%CI) relative risk with the lower and upper limits of 95% confidence interval
The analysis of long-term surgery results average, 49 months after the first surgery. The
showed that the probability of the 5-year survival majority of metachronous cancers were
rate in patients with lung cancer metastasis adenocarcinomas, and their histological pattern
(50.9%) and those with metachronous lung can- usually was different from that present in the
cer (60.7%) was similar. The survival results are primary lung cancer. Metachronous lung cancer
displayed in Fig. 3. Concerning the prognostic was subject to mechanical resection in most
factors in patients with metachronous lung can- cases. The outcome of surgical treatment of
cer after surgical treatment we failed to demon- metachronous lung cancers was akin to that of
strate any effect of such factors as tumor size or lung cancer metastases, with a similar rate of
its localization in the lung, age of patient, or complication (30% and 31%, respectively) and
co-morbidities on the survival rate (Table 5). the similar probability of the 5-year survival rate
(60.7% and 50.9%, respectively).
Martini and Melamed (1975) criteria were
4 Discussion adopted in the present study for distinguishing
between metachronous lung cancer and lung can-
The major finding of this study was that a second cer metastasis, including the time lapse of at least
operation of lung cancer concerned 2 years between the resection of a primary lung
metachronous lung cancer in 47% of cases, i.e., cancer and the appearance of metachronous lung
in about one half of operations occurring after cancer. These criteria are commonly used,
surgical resection of the primary lung cancer; the although they are sometimes subject to critical
other half being due to lung metastases of the evaluation and modification. For example, some
primary cancer. Metachronous lung cancer was studies have adopted the criterion of at least a
observed mostly in men and appeared, on 4-year disease-free time after primary lung
Metachronous Lung Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Effects of Surgical Treatment 15
cancer resection, which enables the diagnosis of The recommended method of surgical treat-
metachronous lung cancer (Ha et al. 2015). In the ment of metachronous lung cancer is an
present study, the mean time from resection of anatomical resection with removal of regional
primary lung cancer to resection of lymph nodes (Wen et al. 2016; Zuin et al.
metachronous lung cancer amounted to 4.6 2013). In the present study, lymph nodes were
2.1 years. Currently, the classical criteria for removed in 48% of metachronous lung cancer
the diagnosis of metachronous lung cancer cases. A low percentage of lymphadenectomy
provided by Martini and Melamed (1975) are was often caused by a misleading treatment of
more often replaced by an extended imaging, metachronous lung cancer as lung cancer
histological, genetic, and molecular diagnostics metastases. The decision on the extent of resec-
(Stiles 2017; Liu et al. 2016). The differentiation tion was made on the basis of an ad-hoc intra-
of metachronous lung cancer from lung cancer operative inspection of a resected tumor; the
metastasis, when both have the same inspection that usually is capable of providing
histopathological cancer tissue structure, can be only the information on the tumor’s neoplastic
assisted with comparative genomic hybridization character. The anatomical resection was
and somatic mutation testing (Arai et al. 2012; performed in just 17% of cases metachronous
Girard et al. 2010; Moffat-Bruce et al. 2010; lung cancer. In the present study, no patient
Wang et al. 2009). Genetic studies, however, passed away in the perioperative period. In liter-
have a limited value due to the possibility of ature, perioperative mortality associated with
different mutations in multiple tumors in the metachronous lung cancer resection ranges
same patient. Such tests also are seldom from 1.4% (Yang et al. 2014) to 2.5% (Zuin
employed since they are not commonly available et al. 2013). We found other postoperative
and pricey. complications following metachronous lung can-
The risk of metachronous lung cancer devel- cer surgery in about one third of patients, as
opment in patients after NSCLC resection is described also by other authors who noted the
1–2% per patient per year (Johnson 1998; John- perioperative occurrence of complications rang-
son et al. 1997). The literature demonstrates that ing from 19% (Zuin et al. 2013) to 34.3% (Yang
the incidence of metachronous lung cancer et al. 2014).
among patients operated on due to primary lung The probability of 5-year survival in the
cancer is about 5% (Ishigaki et al. 2013; patients of the present study treated for
Vansteenkiste et al. 2013). In Poland, the inci- metachronous lung cancer was evaluated as
dence of multiple cancers, most commonly a 60.7%. Almost the identical 5-year survival rate
second lung cancer, has also been reported at of 60.8% has been shown in a study of Hamaji
5% in patients with lung cancer (Romaszko et al. (2013). A higher survival rate of 69.5% has
et al. 2016). In the present study, however, this been shown in a most recent study of Zhao et al.
risk appeared at just 0.4%, which may have been (2017). In that study, however, only were the
due to erratic and insufficient patient attendance patients examined in whom metachronous lung
to follow-up examinations after the surgery. cancer was of adenocarcinoma type. In other
In our opinion, greater attention should be studies, the 5-year survival rate after surgical
paid to the results of a histopathological exami- treatment of metachronous lung cancer has been
nation of metachronous lung cancer. In the pres- calculated at a somehow lower level. Yang et al.
ent study, adenocarcinoma was the most (2014) have demonstrated a 54.5% survival rate,
common histological metachronous cancer type, whereas Koezuka et al. (2015) have found it at
found in 57% of patients. Similar data on the 56.5%. Zuin et al. (2013) have demonstrated a
adenocarcinoma prevalence among 42% survival rate in 121 patients with
metachronous lung cancers are provided by metachronous lung cancer diagnosed according
other authors (Yang et al. 2014; Hamaji et al. to Martini and Melamed’s (1975) criteria. The
2013; Zuin et al. 2013). 2014 meta-analysis of nine studies demonstrates
16 A. Rzechonek et al.
that the 5-year survival rate after surgery of a Acknowledgements Funded by the statutory budget of
second primary NSCLC is 46% (Hamaji et al. Wroclaw Medical University.
2015). There is a clear relationship between the
5-year survival rate and the stage of Conflicts of Interest The authors declare no conflicts of
interest in relation to this article.
metachronous lung cancer (Koezuka et al.
2015), or the extent of surgery: from 57% in
patients with lobectomy to 36% in patients who
undergo segmentectomy or wedge resection References
(Zuin et al 2013). One of the prognostically
adverse factors seems the size of metachronous Arai J, Tsuchiya T, Oikawa M, Mochinaga K, Hayashi T,
Yoshiura K, Tsukamoto K, Yamasaki N,
lung cancer being resected (Hamaji et al. 2013).
Matsumoto K, Miyazaki T, Nagayasu T (2012) Clini-
In the present study, however, tumor size was not cal and molecular analysis of synchronous double lung
a predicting factor for the 5-year survival rate. cancers. Lung Cancer 77:281–287
In the present study, the 5-year survival rate Asamura H, Nakayama H, Kondo H, Tsuchiya R, Naruke
T (1999) Lobe-specific extent of systematic lymph
after surgery for metachronous lung cancer was
node dissection for non-small cell lung carcinomas
inappreciably greater than that for lung cancer according to a retrospective study of metastasis and
metastases. In contrast, the 2015 meta-analysis prognosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:1102–1111
that included 1,796 patients in 22 studies has Edge SB, Compton CC (2010) The American joint com-
mittee on cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer
demonstrated that the overall survival of patients
staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg
with multiple primary lung cancers, both Oncol 17(6):1471–1474
metachronous and synchronous tumors were Gamliel Z (2016) Mediastinal staging in non-small cell
taken into consideration, is longer than that in lung cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 25:493–502
Girard N, Deshpande C, Azzoli CG, Rusch VW, Travis
patients operated on due to intra-pulmonary lung
WD, Ladanyi M, Pao W (2010) Use of epidermal
cancer metastases; relative risk of 2.66 with 95% growth factor receptor/Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral
CI of 1.30–5.44, p < 0.01 (Jiang et al. 2015). oncogene homolog mutation testing to define clonal
relationships among multiple lung adenocarcinomas:
comparison with clinical guidelines. Chest 137
(1):46–52
5 Conclusions Ha D, Choi H, Chevalier C, Zell K, Wang XF, Mazzone
PJ (2015) Survival in patients with metachronous sec-
ond primary lung cancer. Ann Am Thorac Soc 12
Among lung tumors arising after resection of the (1):79–84
primary lung cancer, the likelihood of Hamaji M, Allen MS, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, Nichols
metachronous lung cancer is akin to that of pul- FC, Wigle DA, Shen KR (2013) Surgical treatment of
metachronous second primary lung cancer after com-
monary lung cancer metastasis. Surgically plete resection of non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac
resected metachronous lung cancer is in most Cardiovasc Surg 145:683–690
cases of adenocarcinoma type, and the Hamaji M, Ali SO, Burt BM (2015) A meta-analysis of
histopathological pattern usually differs from resected metachronous second non-small cell lung
cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 99:1470–1478
that of the primary lung cancer. Patients who Hytych V, Taskova A, Horazdovsky P, Konopa Z,
undergo primary lung cancer surgery require a Demes R, Cermak J, Vrabcova A, Hoferka P, Pohnan
long-term follow-up due to the risk of lung can- R (2013) Importance of systemic mediastinal
cer metastasis or metachronous lung cancer. The lymphadenectomy in exact staging of bronchogenic
carcinoma. Bratisl Lek Listy 114:569–572
incidence of early postoperative complications Ishigaki T, Yoshimasu T, Oura S, Ota F, Nakamura R,
and the probability of 5-year survival after Hirai Y, Okamura Y (2013) Surgical treatment for
metachronous lung cancer and lung cancer metachronous second primary lung cancer after radi-
metastasis resection are similar. cal resection of primary lung cancer. Ann Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg 19:341–344
Metachronous Lung Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Effects of Surgical Treatment 17
Abstract
In Poland, the seasonal influenza vaccination rate is just barely 3% which
may be related to the unsatisfactory knowledge of influenza among
healthcare professionals, poor recognition of the benefits of influenza
immunization and the fear of side effects. To address these issues, we
surveyed healthcare professionals through an online questionnaire
consisting of 18 closed-ended items. The questionnaire was completed
by 495 healthcare professionals, mostly physicians (83%). The results
revealed gaps in the knowledge concerning influenza diagnosis,
complications, risk groups, and prognostic factors. On average,
respondents only answered 4.8 of the 18 questions correctly (27%).
Only 10% of respondents passed the threshold of 50% correct answers.
The knowledge of contraindications to vaccination far outweighed the
knowledge of indications for vaccination. Poor knowledge with a focus on
the adverse effects of immunization may be a significant factor responsi-
ble for the low vaccination rate in Poland. To increase vaccination rate,
healthcare professionals need to be educated about influenza-related risks
and benefits of vaccination.
Keywords
Decision making • Healthcare professionals • Immunization • Influenza •
Recommendations • vaccination
E. Kuchar
Department of Pediatrics with Clinical Assessment Unit,
Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
K. Ludwikowska
Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Wroclaw
A. Nitsch-Osuch (*)
Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
Department of Social Medicine and Public Health,
A. Antczak Medical University of Warsaw, 3 Oczki Street,
Department of General and Oncological Pulmonology, 02-007 Warsaw, Poland
Lodz Medical University, Lodz, Poland e-mail: [email protected]
19
20 E. Kuchar et al.
study by two members of the Polish Expert Com- (10.3% of correct answers), vaccine administra-
mittee of the National Program for Influenza tion routes (11.3% of correct answers), influenza
Prevention. The items contained a variable list diagnosis tests (12.1% of correct answers), and
of correct choices. When more than one choice interpretation of rapid test (13.9% of correct
was correct, all correct choices in an item had to answers). Only did 9.7% of respondents give
be checked off to include the item into correct correct answers concerning the symptoms raising
responses. The questionnaire items, along with a specter of a severe or progressive course of
the responses provided by the interviewees, are influenza. Healthcare professionals also had a
displayed in Table 2. The survey was conducted difficulty in defining the proper vaccine dosing
on-line via social media or email among a in the pediatric population (16.3% of correct
varied group of healthcare professionals. The answers). However, a low number of
questionnaire was anonymous and voluntary, pediatricians participating in the study (4% of
and the participants were informed about its respondents) could bear on this matter. Finally,
aim. Answers were scored as correct based on only did 10% of respondents pass the survey with
published literature and current the threshold set at 50% of correct answers
recommendations of the Advisory Committee (Table 2).
on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
4 Discussion
At this early period of the naval war, the employment of the depth
charge as the most efficient weapon against the submarine had not
been fully developed. The traditions of accurate gunfire as the best
offensive were not easily set aside. It was true of the destroyers at
Queenstown, as of these yachts bound to France, that their crews
felt sublimely certain of smashing Fritz with the batteries at which
they drilled like so many skilled football teams. Soon they came to
realize, however, that the chance of catching the enemy napping on
the surface was extremely remote and that shooting at periscopes,
even when they were not imaginary, was futile business.
The Corsair was armed with four three-inch rifles, and their crews
were very capably trained under the direction of Ensign Schanze.
This armament was not heavy enough to match the guns of a U-boat
if the latter had been plucky enough to stand up to a duel, but it
served to drive him under and to inspire a wholesome respect. The
superior speed of the yacht made her particularly well fitted for using
depth charges, but at the outset she was equipped with no more
than ten of the small and rather crude “Sperry mine” loaded with
from thirty to fifty pounds of TNT. This device was exploded by
means of a buoy and wire cable which unwound as the steel canister
plunged through the water, releasing the detonator at the proper
depth. These mines frequently failed to function and the destructive
effect was feeble.
The Navy Department later perfected a terrific “ash can” packed
with three hundred pounds of high explosive which was set off by
means of a hydrostatic valve and could be relied upon to devastate a
submarine a hundred feet below the surface of the sea. These great
bombs were dropped, not one or two in an attack, but fairly dumped
overboard by the dozen or the score in a cataclysmic barrage, after
listening devices had located and “fixed” the enemy. The “Y gun,” or
twin mortar, was also invented to hurl these metal kegs a
considerable distance from the ship. Such were the perfected tactics
learned from experience, which would surely have doomed the U-
boat to extinction if the armistice had not intervened. The Corsair
was fitted out in this manner later in her service, but she blithely
sailed for the war zone with her four small guns and a few “Sperry
pills” and could have felt no more pride in her task if she had been a
first-class battleship.
Concerning the voyage, Commander Kittinger reported as follows,
in the War Diary of the yacht:
Got under way at 4 a.m., June 14th, and stood down the
river, anchoring at 6 a.m. off Governor’s Island on account
of fog. Got under way again at 9.40 a.m. Laid to off
Ambrose Light Vessel at 1.20 p.m. Joined Group No. 1 at
1.50 p.m. and took departure from Ambrose Light Vessel at
2.09 p.m., standard speed 12 knots. At 2.30 p.m. weather
became misty again which necessitated closing in to keep
the convoy in sight. The 4 to 8 p.m. watch had difficulty in
keeping steam for 12 knots. Blowers were used to assist.
Ship lost distance which was recovered in the next watch
and position maintained.
At 11.40 p.m. the fog set in thick and lasted until about
1.25 a.m., June 15th. At 3.20 a.m. the convoy was sighted
on the port bow, distance four miles. During the watch the
ship logged over 12 knots by revolutions of main engines,
but due to deep draft was unable to keep up. The blowers
were run continually to assist. The forward boiler could not
be lighted off as it was banked in with reserve coal supply.
Between 4 and 5 a.m. while cleaning fires the speed by
revolutions dropped to 11 knots. A moderate sea was
running which caused seasickness among the firemen.
The firemen were drafted from the U.S.S. Delaware
through the receiving ship at New York and were
unfamiliar with firing Scotch boilers and not accustomed to
the quick and deep roll of small ships. Most of them
became useless during the cleaning fire period and their
places were taken by petty officers of the engine and fire-
room watch. The ship continued to lose distance astern of
convoy, a logged speed of 10½ knots being maintained. I
gave this matter my personal attention and every effort
was made to rejoin the convoy. From noon to midnight an
average speed of 11¾ knots was logged. At 4.45 p.m. the
Wilkes came within hail and made inquiries as to the
cause of the Corsair’s inability to keep in position.
June 16th. An average speed of 10½ knots was logged
for the day. I found that the seasoned men, most of them
petty officers, were showing fatigue due to the hard
steaming qualities of the ship. A number of volunteers
from the deck force went below and passed coal and
handled ashes to assist. The reserve coal from the dead
fire-room was removed to allow the forward boiler to be
lighted off. Group No. 1 was not seen this day. Group No.
2 was sighted astern at 3.40 a.m. Lighted fires in boiler
No. 1 at 6 p.m.
June 17th. Maintained about 11 knots (by revolutions).
Some of the firemen who had suffered from seasickness
were back at useful work and the ship had become
considerably lighter. At 5 p.m. cut in boiler No. 1 and
increased speed to 13 knots. Between 1 and 2 p.m. two
U.S. destroyers passed six miles to the southward, one
heading east and one west.
June 18th. Averaged 13½ knots until 10.40 a.m. when
speed was reduced to 10 knots to lose distance and join
Group No. 2.
June 19th. Proceeding at reduced speed to allow Group
No. 2 to overhaul.
June 20th. Proceeding at reduced speed, about 9 knots,
to allow Group No. 2 to overhaul. It was desirable to keep
a speed that was low but economical to get the mileage
for the fuel.
June 21st. Proceeding at reduced speed, about 7 knots.
At 3.45 a.m. sighted Group No. 2 on port quarter,—
distance four miles. Changed course to intercept. At 5.15
a.m. took position on starboard beam of Henderson,
distance 2000 yards. At 6 p.m. sighted U.S.S. Maumee
and U.S.S. Henley on starboard bow. The Burrows joined
the Maumee and refueled. At 8.22 a.m. stopped and
lowered a boat and boarded the Birmingham for orders. At
9.35 a.m. proceeded in formation at 12 knots. Had no
trouble in keeping position from this time on with natural
draft. Zigzagged during the afternoon.
June 22nd and 23rd. Proceeding with Group No. 2.
Zigzagged during daylight.
June 24th. Momus broke out break-down flag and
dropped astern of formation. At 8.17 a.m. sighted three
destroyers one point on port bow. Five destroyers joined
escort during the morning.
June 25th. Proceeding as before. At 5.30 a.m. steamed
at 14 knots. At noon steamed at 13 knots. Zigzagged
during daylight.
June 26th. Proceeding with Group No. 2, steaming at 13
knots. The U.S.S. Cummings let go a depth charge at 2.00
p.m. about 600 yards ahead. Manœuvred for attack.
Nothing sighted. Returned to formation. Two French
torpedo craft joined escort about 4 p.m.
June 27th. Entered port during mid-watch. Anchored
during morning watch with 32 tons of coal remaining.
Arrived at Saint-Nazaire, France, with Group No. 2 of
Expeditionary Force.
These were tired and grateful sailors aboard the Corsair, for the
slow-gaited transports, thirteen days on the voyage, had caused
continual anxiety among the war vessels of the escort. The first
group had been attacked by submarines, as reported by Rear
Admiral Gleaves, and it was an auspicious omen that every ship and
every soldier had been carried across unharmed. The Corsair had
been compelled to drop back and join the second group, but it was
not her fault. As her skipper in former days, Lieutenant Commander
Porter was unhappy, as you may imagine, although he knew that the
yacht would vindicate herself when in proper trim and with a “black
gang” that could make steam and hold it.
Extra coal and stores had made the draft two feet deeper than
normal. One boiler-room was used for coal stowage, but a speed of
fourteen knots was to be expected under these conditions. The
firemen, trained in a battleship, were green to their task and were
bowled off their pins by seasickness. It indicated the spirit of the ship
when the petty officers, deck force and all, and as many other
volunteers as could find space to swing slice-bar and shovel, toiled
in the sultry heat of the furnaces to shove the ship along. Never
again was the Corsair a laggard. Month after month on the Breton
Patrol or with the offshore convoys, the destroyers were the only
ships that could show their heels to her.
The process of “shaking down,” of welding a hundred and thirty
men into a crew, and teaching them what the Navy was like, had
begun with the hard routine at the docks in Hoboken and Brooklyn.
The voyage was the second lesson and it wonderfully helped to
hammer home the doctrines of team-work and morale, of cheerful
sacrifice and ready obedience. Those who grumbled repented of it
later and held it as a privilege that they were permitted to play the
great game. It was while they sweltered to make more steam and
urge the ship to greater speed that an Irish stoker expressed himself
as follows:
“I have heard tell of the meltin’-pot, but ’tis me first experience with
it. Hotter than hell wid the lid off, and ye can see thim all meltin’, and
will ye listen to the names of the brave American lads, Brillowski,
Schlotfeldt, Aguas, and Teuten that signed on to juggle the coal. An’
will ye pipe off the true-blue Yankee sailors, Haase, and Skolmowski,
Fusco, Kaetzel, and Balano, not to mintion such good old Anglo-
Saxon guys as De Armosolo, Thysenius, and Wysocki. I will make
no invidjous distinctions, but what kind of a fightin’ ship would this be
if ye hadn’t Gilhooley, Mullins, Murphy, Mulcahy, Egan, Sullivan, and
Flynn? The meltin’-pot! ’Tis a true word. An’ may the domned old
Kaiser sizzle in a hotter place, if there is wan.”
One of the boyish bluejackets noted his own change of heart in a
diary which contained such entries as these:
June 19th. At 6 a.m. we sighted an empty lifeboat. Don’t
know where it came from, as there was no name. We also
saw two objects floating quite far off and thought they
were corpses, but were not sure.... Stood two watches
and had an abandon ship drill and gun practice. Wrote
some letters, but don’t know when we can mail them.
Sighted a big whale not fifty yards from the ship. It scared
me. I was at the wheel and thought it was a submarine.
Sleeping in my bunk for the first time since leaving New
York.
21st. We are having a typical northeaster and the ship is
burying her rails in the sea now and then. We have joined
the second group of the fleet. It consists of the
Birmingham, four transports, a destroyer, ourselves, and
the Aphrodite.... 22nd. The northeaster is still on in full
blast and the sea is running high. We hope to reach
France Tuesday. The food and the life on this ship are
pretty bad, and when this war is over and I sign off I shall
devoutly thank God.
23rd. A pretty bad day all round. High sea, rain, and fog.
We are now in the war zone and zigzagging back and
forth across the ocean. The Birmingham has kept us busy
all day with signals. The ship has been very hard to steer
and I am tired out. Broke a filling out of my tooth and it
hurts. Hope I will get a chance to have it fixed in France. A
toothache out here would certainly be bad. Have been
unable to take a bath for a week. Am washing in a bucket
of water.
24th. Another day of nasty weather. The mid-watch was
the worst I ever stood. The fog was awful and when I was
at the wheel we almost rammed the Antilles. We also
dodged two suspicious-looking steel drums that looked
very much like mines.... 25th. Our coal is getting low and
we will surely land some time to-morrow morning. I wish I
could talk French. Everybody is writing letters home to-
day. Stood a terrible watch with Mr. Tod on the bridge. He
and Captain Kittinger took turns bawling me out. I almost
rammed a destroyer twice by obeying orders to the letter,
but the officers were in a bad temper and blamed me.
Gad, but I’ll be glad to set foot on dry land.
Somewhat later this same young man was jotting down:
Whoever reads this diary will probably notice my
changed attitude toward what we have to put up with.
What seemed unbearable a few months ago amounts to
nothing, now that we have become hardened to all things.
I have read the whole diary through and laughed at my
early grouches.
And so the Corsair came to France and rested in the quaint old
port of Saint-Nazaire while her men beheld the troops of Pershing’s
First Division stream down the gangways and receive a welcome
thrilling beyond words, the cheers and outstretched hands, the
laughter and the tears of a people who hailed these tall, careless
fighting men as crusaders come to succor them. This was a sight
worth seeing and remembering. And when the American sailors went
ashore there was an ovation for them, flowers and kisses and
smiles, and if such courtesies were bestowed upon the bluejackets
of the Corsair, they gallantly returned them, it is quite needless to
say.
Seven of the crew were granted liberty for a hasty trip to Paris.
Seaman Arthur Coffey was in the party and his written impressions
convey a glimpse of what it meant to these young Americans to
come into contact with the sombre realities of the struggle which
France was enduring with her back to the wall. It surprised and
amused them to find the American infantrymen already so much at
home in Saint-Nazaire that their liveliest interest was in shooting
craps at the street corners:
Here were soldiers and sailors who had just crossed an
ocean full of hidden terrors [observed Arthur Coffey], and
most of them were to face worse terrors later on, but did
they consider these things? Not for a minute! They had
money in their pockets and beer under their belts and this
“spiggoty” currency, as they called the wads of paper
notes, made them feel like millionaires. The marines had
not arrived to police the streets, so they rattled the dice in
crowds. For all they saw or cared, they might have been in
their own home towns, perfectly indifferent to their
surroundings. The French onlookers were different. They
were appraising these new comrades-in-arms, whispering
among themselves, admiring the equipment and the
rugged stature of these soldiers from beyond the seas. We
watched the fun until it was time to find the train for Paris
and moved away with cries of, “Shoot the cinq-froncs,”
“Fade him for a cart-wheel, Bill,” “Come on, you baby,”
ringing in our ears.
We got aboard the right train with the kind assistance of
a French lady who interpreted for us. It was great luck to
get the seventy-two-hour leave, and the crowd was
congenial, five men from Princeton, one from Yale, and
one from Cornell. The trip to Paris was lengthy because
we had to travel second class and sit up all night, being
Navy gobs and not officers. The French took us for plain,
ordinary bluejackets and fraternized at once. Their style of
opening a conversation was to sit and look at you for a
time, smile, and then having attracted your attention, with
a terrifying grimace ejaculate: “Le boche, ah-h-h-k!”
drawing a hand across the throat. This done they would
beam expectantly and, needless to say, we responded
with grimaces even more terrifying and repeated the
formula. Having mutually slit the gullet of the hated foe, I
would add, to show off my French, “Je n’aime pas le
boche!” Then the way was opened for a conversation.
“Parlez-vous français, monsieur?” “Mais un peu,
monsieur,” I would say, and then bang away with the
stereotyped sentence, “I have studied French two years at
school and I can understand the language pretty well, but I
cannot speak it.” As soon as my friend, the French soldier,
heard me rip off this sentence he would open his eyes and
say, “Parlez bien français, monsieur” and then start talking
so fast that I could not understand a word, and this would
be the end of the conversation, on my part, at least.
Some of my companions, however, were even worse
performers than I. Poor old Bill Rahill, who was in my class
in college, had taken economic courses and so knew no
modern languages. All he could say was “Oui” and “Non
comprenny, monsieur,” at which I would nudge him and
ask if it were not better, perhaps, to have a little culture
and know something about a foreign language than to be
cluttered up with the Malthusian theory or some other rot
like that.
We had a great time on that train to Paris. At the first
long stop almost everybody got out and went into the
waiting-room, or saloon, and bought various refreshments.
We had seen no grass or green trees for two weeks, so
we piled out and made for the beautiful lawn near the
station. We rolled on the grass and sniffed the pine trees.
We were like cats that had been shy of catnip for a long
time. I suppose the French people thought we were crazy,
but we didn’t care, and it certainly did feel good to have
the green earth under our feet again.
BOATSWAIN’S MATE THE TALL ONE IS
SEGER, FROM PASSAIC PHARMACIST’S MATE
FEELEY HIS FRIEND IS
MESS ATTENDANT
MARTINEZ
FOOTNOTES:
[1] See Chapter xiv.
[2] Returned home on ship twenty-three months later.
[3] Destroyer Cummings.
CHAPTER III
AT SEA WITH THE BRETON PATROL
W HEN the Corsair arrived on the French coast there was nothing
to indicate the vast American organization, military and naval,
which was soon to be created with a speed and efficiency almost
magical. Supply bases, docks, fuel stations, railroads were, at the
outset, such as France could provide from her own grave
necessities. Marshal Joffre and Lord Balfour had convinced the
Government at Washington that if the United States delayed to
prepare, it might be too late. Troops were demanded, above all else.
Man power was the vital thing. And so these early divisions were
hurried overseas to Pershing with little more than the equipment on
their backs.
The Navy was aware of its own share of the problem which was to
extend its fighting front to the shores of France as well as to the Irish
Sea. To protect the ocean traffic to and from the United States,
small, swift ships were required by the dozens and scores, but they
could not be built in a day, and, as a British admiral expressed it,
“This rotten U-boat warfare had caught all the Allies with their socks
down.” Of the naval escort with the First Expeditionary Force, the
cruisers returned to the United States for further convoy duty and the
destroyers went either with them or were ordered to join the flotilla at
Queenstown. For a short time the Corsair and another large yacht,
the Aphrodite, were left to comprise the American naval strength on
the French coast. On June 30th, Commander Kittinger received the
following instructions from Rear Admiral Gleaves:
When in all respects ready for sea, proceed with the
vessel under your command to Brest, France, and report
to the Senior French Naval Officer for duty. Exhibit these
orders to the Senior United States Naval Officer in Brest.
Upon the arrival of Captain W. B. Fletcher, U.S. Navy,
report to him for duty.
The tenor of these orders indicated the wise and courteous policy
which Vice-Admiral Henry B. Wilson was later to develop with
brilliant success—that of coöperation with and deference to the
French naval authorities instead of asserting the independence of
command which, in fact, he exercised. At this time Captain Fletcher
had been appointed to organize the American “Special Patrol Force,”
and he was daily expected to arrive in the yacht Noma. The ancient
port of Brest was selected as the chief naval base because the
French had long used it for this purpose, maintaining dockyards,
repair shops, and arsenals, and also because the largest transports
afloat could be moored in its deep and spacious harbor. Saint-
Nazaire and Bordeaux became the great entry ports for cargo
steamers during the war, while into Brest the huge liners carried
twenty thousand or forty thousand troops in a single convoy.