Antenatal Care
Antenatal Care
RESEARCH ARTICLE
a1111111111 * [email protected]
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111
a1111111111 Abstract
Background
World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that every pregnant woman receive quality
OPEN ACCESS care throughout pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period. It is estimated that institu-
Citation: Asmamaw DB, Habitu YA, Mekonnen EG, tional delivery could reduce 16% to 33% of maternal deaths. Despite the importance of giv-
Negash WD (2023) Antenatal care booked rural
ing birth at a health institution, in Ethiopia, according to the Ethiopian Demographic Health
residence women have home delivery during the
era of COVID-19 pandemic in Gidan District, Survey report, nearly half of the ANC-booked mothers gave birth at home. Therefore, this
Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 18(12): e0295220. https://doi. study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of home delivery among
org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295220 antenatal care-booked women in their last pregnancy during the era of COVID-19.
Editor: Pracheth Raghuveer, Kasturba Medical
College Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Methods
Education, INDIA
A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted from March 30 to April 29, 2021.
Received: April 13, 2022
A simple random technique was employed to select 770 participants among women booked
Accepted: November 18, 2023 for antenatal care. Interviewer-administered questionnaires were used to collect the data. A
Published: December 5, 2023 binary logistic regression model was fitted. Adjusted odds ratios with its respective 95% con-
fidence interval were used to declare the associated factors.
Peer Review History: PLOS recognizes the
benefits of transparency in the peer review
process; therefore, we enable the publication of Results
all of the content of peer review and author
The prevalence of home delivery was 28.8% (95% CI: 25.7, 32.2). Rural residence (AOR =
responses alongside final, published articles. The
editorial history of this article is available here: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.23, 3.34), unmarried women (AOR = 11.16, 95% CI: 4.18, 29.79), husband
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295220 education (AOR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.72, 3.91), not being involved in the women’s development
Copyright: © 2023 Asmamaw et al. This is an open army (AOR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.01, 2.65), and fear of COVID-19 infection (AOR = 3.86, 95%
access article distributed under the terms of the CI: 2.31, 6.44) were significantly associated factors of home delivery.
Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
Conclusion
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited. Even though the government tried to lower the rate of home delivery by accessing health
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are institutions in remote areas, implementing a women’s development army, and introducing
within the paper and Supporting Information file. maternal waiting home utilization, nearly one in every three pregnant women gave birth at
Funding: The author(s) received no specific home among ANC booked women in their last pregnancy. Thus, improving the husband’s
funding for this work. educational status, providing information related to health institution delivery benefits during
Competing interests: The authors have declared antenatal care, and strengthening the implementation of the women’s development army,
that no competing interests exist. particularly among rural and unmarried women, would decrease home childbirth practices.
Abbreviations: ANC, Antenatal Care; AOR,
Adjusted Odds Rati; CI, Confidence Intervals; COR,
Crude Odds Ratio; COVID-19, Coronavirus disease;
EDHS, Ethiopian Demographic, and Health Survey;
LICs, Low-Income Countries; OR, Odds Ratio; Background
PNC, Postnatal Care; WDA, Women Development
Army; SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals; Maternal mortality is one of the most common public health problems in low and middle-
WHO, World Health Organization. income countries [1]. Reduction of maternal mortality remains a priority agenda under Goal 3
in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through 2030. This calls for the
ambition of a maternal mortality ratio reduction of less than 70 per 100,000 live births between
2016 and 2030 [2]. Worldwide, approximately 295,000 women died during and after preg-
nancy and childbirth. The majority (94%) of deaths occurred in developing countries, includ-
ing Ethiopia. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Southern Asia accounted for approximately 86%
of all maternal deaths worldwide. Of this, two-thirds of the deaths were from SSA [3,4]. The
maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in low-income countries is 462 deaths per 100,000 live births
[3]. Ethiopia is among the countries in which high maternal mortality has occurred. The
MMR in Ethiopia is 412 deaths per 100,000 live births [3].
The continuum of maternal health care is crucial to saving the mother and the child. In
addition, they are indicators of progress toward the achievement of sustainable development
goals [5,6]. The World Health Organization endorsed the need for skilled care for all women
during their labor and immediately afterward [7]. ANC follow-up has increased in many parts
of the world. However, only 46% of developing countries and 26% of Ethiopia benefited from
skilled personnel attendance. Attendance by skilled personnel is advocated as the single most
important factor in preventing maternal mortality and morbidity [6,8].
In SSA, only 17.7% of women chose to deliver at the health institution [9]. If pregnant
women give birth at home, it increases the risk of infection and postpartum hemorrhage [10].
As a result, maternal deaths from hemorrhage, prolonged or obstructed labor, ruptured uterus,
severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, sepsis, and abortion complications continue to be a prob-
lem [11]. The aforementioned causes can be detected and managed early during ANC and the
intrapartum period by existing and well-known medical interventions [12]. Most home deliv-
eries, mainly those of unattended births, are not only a problem for the mother, but they also
result in perinatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. In the SSA, home births were found
to have a 21% higher rate of perinatal mortality than facility births [13].
Home delivery in itself is not a cause of maternal and child deaths, it becomes a risk factor
when home deliveries occur without a skilled attendant due to the possibility of infection or a
lack of equipment in case of complications [14]. Attending an ANC visit does not mean that
deliveries of pregnant women will take place at a health institution. Despite 62% of women
attending ANC, three-fourths of women nationwide gave birth at home [8]. Another study
from Ethiopia revealed that many women unpredictably did not give birth in health institu-
tions despite antenatal care [6].
Because of the COVID-19 infection, countries are facing significant challenges to maintain
high-quality, essential maternal and newborn health services [15]. Mothers with newborns and
pregnant women may experience difficulty accessing healthcare services due to disruptions in
transportation and lockdowns or fear of COVID-19 infection. Thus, pregnancy-related and
newborn healthcare coverage declined by 10% due to the pandemic. This would result in
28,000 maternal deaths [15,16].
There are variety of literature reporting factors that affect the use of ANC services and the
place of delivery [17–24], but there is no adequate literature explaining why ANC-booked
women prefer home deliveries. This leaves maternal morbidity and mortality a public health
problem. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the prevalence and associated factors of
home delivery among women who had antenatal care booked in their last pregnancy during
the era of COVID-19. By analyzing this study, policymakers will be able to find the appropriate
strategy for improving maternal and child health in the area.
Methods
Study design and setting
A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from March 30 to April 29,
2021, in the Gidan district, North Wollo zone, Northeastern Ethiopia. The district is located
595 Kilometers (km) away from Addis Ababa, the capital city of Ethiopia, and it has two urban
and 21 rural kebeles (the lowest administrative unit). It has an estimated 148,058 population
based on the population projection from the 2007 census through 2020, of which 74,461 and
29,649 are females and reproductive age women, respectively. The district has six health cen-
ters and 23 health posts that provide routine health services for the catchment population [25].
The study was conducted from March 30 to April 29, 2021.
2
ð1:96Þ ð0:352Þ ð1 0:352Þ
n¼ ¼ 350
ð0:05Þ2
n = 350
After adding a 10% non-response rate and multiplying it by the design effect of 2, the total
sample size of this study was 770 mothers. A simple random sampling technique was used to
select the participants. From 23 kebeles, seven kebeles were selected by a simple random sam-
pling technique using the lottery method. The list of ANC-booked mothers who gave birth in
the last year was identified by the health center and health extension workers. The sample size
was proportionally allocated to each selected kebele, considering the number of women. Moth-
ers in the sampled kebeles were selected by using a simple random sampling technique (Open
Epi Random Program version 3) (Fig 1). Regardless of the outcome, limiting the participants
to only 1 year and after one month of giving birth was done to minimize potential recall bias
and make the mother stabilized and comfortable. If the respondents were not available at
home during the time of data collection, interviewers revisited the households three times, and
when the interviewers failed to find the eligible respondent after three visits, the next house-
hold was included.
Study variables
The outcome variable was home delivery. when a woman gave birth at her home or others’
homes (neighbors, relatives, or family) or when a birth took place outside of health institu-
tions. It was dichotomized and coded as "0" and "1," representing those who had delivered at
health institutions and home, respectively [26]. The independent variables were socio-demo-
graphic (age, educational status of women and husbands, occupation, marital status, resi-
dence), obstetrics-related characteristics (parity, pregnancy status, bad obstetric history),
fear of COVID-19 infection, and other characteristics like membership in the Women’s
Development Army (WDA). Fear of COVID-19 infection means fear of oneself or family
members being infected with COVID-19 infection during pregnancy when visiting health
institutions [27].
Ethical considerations
Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of
Gondar (Ref. No: IPH/142/2013). Similarly, a supportive letter was taken from the district
administrative office to be given to the selected kebeles. Verbal informed consent was obtained
from each participant. Participants were also informed that participation was voluntary and
that they had the right to withdraw from the study at any time they wanted. All data obtained
from participants was kept confidential and used only for this study. The study was conducted
according to the Helsinki Declaration.
Results
Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents
About 760 women participated, giving a response rate of 98.7%. The mean age of the study
participants was 27 (SD±5.3) years, and 306 (40.3%) of them fell within the age category of 26–
30 years. Three-fourths (75.4%) of the respondents were rural dwellers, and almost all (99.6%)
participants were orthodox Christian followers (Table 1).
Place of delivery
The prevalence of home delivery in Gidan district was 28.8% (95% CI: 25.7%, 32.2%).
Discussion
This study is a community-based study in randomly selected kebeles that includes both urban
and rural settings. During pregnancy, childbirth, and the immediate postpartum period, the
continuum of maternal health care is crucial. Even though health institutions are relatively
accessible in remote areas, a significant number of pregnant women still give birth at home,
contrary to the plan of health institution delivery. The purpose of this study was to determine
the prevalence and associated factors of home delivery among ANC-booked mothers in their
last pregnancy during the era of COVID-19 in Gidan District, Northeastern, Ethiopia.
The prevalence of women who gave birth at home among ANC-booked women was 28.8%
(95%CI: 25.7–32.2). This finding is higher than studies conducted in Southern Ethiopia 22.8%
[35] and in Bench Maji zone, Ethiopia 21.7% [36]. This difference might be due to the fear of
COVID-19 transmissions and interruptions of services [37,38]. In addition, possibly due to
internal conflicts (war) in the area, war can result in the distraction of infrastructure like roads,
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the respondents in Gidan District, Northeastern Ethiopia, 2021
(N = 760).
Variables Frequency(n) Percentage (%)
Age of the mother in years
<20 74 9.7
20–25 197 25.9
26–30 306 40.3
>30 183 24.1
Religion
Orthodox 757 99.6
Muslim 3 0.4
Educational status of the mother
No formal education 346 45.5
Primary school 302 39.7
Secondary school and above 112 14.8
Occupation of the mother
Housewife 645 84.9
Government employed 83 10.9
Self-employed 24 3.1
Other * 8 1.1
Current marital status
Married 671 88.3
Single 63 8.3
Widowed 18 2.4
Other** 8 1
Educational status of the husband
No formal education 361 53.8
Primary school 202 30.1
Secondary school and above 108 16.1
Occupation of the husband
Farmer 541 80.6
Government employed 51 7.6
Self-employed 61 9.1
Other*** 18 2.7
Residence
Rural 573 75.4
Urban 187 24.6
*student
**divorced, separated
***daily labor, soldier.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295220.t001
and most of the participants in the study areas are far from the health institutions, so it takes a
long time to reach them by walking without an ambulance, and it is difficult to go to a health
institution during the war. Scholars indicated that low maternal healthcare service utilization
was higher in conflict areas than in non-conflict affected areas [39]. This seems to be an impor-
tant determinant, which may preclude women from accessing delivery services.
On the other hand, the result of this study is lower than studies from the 2016 Ethiopian
Health Survey report (EDHS), where 67.2% of the mothers delivered at home [22], and
another Ethiopian pooled prevalence of 66.7% [40]. The possible justification for the difference
Table 2. Obstetrics and other related factors of the respondent in Gidan District, Northeastern Ethiopia, 2021
(N = 760).
Variables Frequency (n) Percentage (%)
Parity
Primipara 148 19.5
Multipara 612 80.5
Antenatal care
Yes 650 85.5
No 110 14.5
Pregnancy status
Planned 703 92.5
Unplanned 57 7.5
Membership for WDA
Yes 156 20.5
No 604 79.5
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295220.t002
might be differences in the study area and source population. The current study included only
women who had ANC follow-up, while the previous studies included women who did not
have ANC follow-up. In addition to this, the decrease in home delivery in the current study
could be because the government and other supporting organizations are working strongly to
increase institutional delivery service utilization [17,21].
In addition, the strengthening of the health extension program and the implementation of
WDA facilitate maternal health care services, including institutional delivery [41]. The estab-
lishment of maternal waiting homes also played a greater role (80% of the reduction of mater-
nal deaths) in improving the current reduction in home delivery [42]. This implied that
strengthening the above activities would result in a better outcome.
Women from rural dwellers had 2.02 times more odds of delivering at home than women
from urban dwellers; this finding is consistent with studies conducted in Ethiopia [31],
Uganda [43], and Nigeria [44]. The possible reason might be that rural women were less edu-
cated and less exposed to media messages [45]. Inaccessibility of services due to a lack of trans-
portation and long distances to travel to the health institutions. Furthermore, rural women
have less decision-making autonomy, less knowledge of pregnancy complications, and less
access to information than urban women [23,46].
Table 3. Multi-variable regression for factors associated with home delivery in Gidan District, Northeastern, Ethi-
opia, 2021(N = 760).
Variables Home delivery COR(95%CI AOR (95%CI)
Yes No
Age (years)
<20 25 49 1.16 (0.65–2.06) 1.43(0.67–3.04)
20–25 56 141 0.90 (0.58–1.14) 0.89 (0.51–1.57)
26–30 82 224 0.83 (0.55–1.24) 0.86(0.53–1.38)
>30 56 127 1 1
Educational status respondents
No formal 111 235 2.05 (1.21–3.46) 1.47 (0.78–2.79)
Education
Primary 87 215 1.75 (1.03–3.00) 1.51 (0.81–2.29)
Secondary and above 21 91 1 1
Education of husband
No formal education 118 250 1.98(1.38–2.84) 2.60(1.72,3.91)
Formal education 58 245 1 1
Residence
Urban 43 144 1 1
Rural 176 397 1.48 (1.01–2.18) 2.02 (1.23–3.34)*
Current marital
status
Married 168 503 1 1
Unmarried 51 38 4.02 (2.55–6.33) 11.16 (4.18–29.79)*
Parity
Primipara 38 110 1 1
Multipara 181 431 1.22 (0.81–1.83) 1.38 (0.79–2.38)
Membership for WDA
Yes 36 120 1 1
No 183 421 1.45 (0.96–2.19) 1.64 (1.01–2.65)*
Fear of COVID-19
No 33 195 1 1
Yes 186 346 3.18 (2.11–479) 3.86 (2.31–6.44)*
Lack of transport
No 175 482 1 1
Yes 44 59 2.05 (1.34–3.15) 1.54 (0.90–2.64)*
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295220.t003
According to the findings of this study, unmarried women were 11.16 times more likely to
deliver at home than married women. This finding is supported by other studies conducted in
Jimma [47] and Southern Ethiopia [48]. The reason behind this might be that unmarried
women do not receive support from husbands, and the health delivery system of Ethiopia
favors married women over unmarried women [30].
Pregnant women whose husbands have no formal education have higher odds of delivering
at home compared to those with formal education. This is consistent with studies reported in
our country and abroad [19,20,22,49,50]. The possible explanation might be that non-educated
husbands are more conservative towards the cultural practices of home delivery. Besides, non-
educated husbands are unaware of the difficulties and complications associated with
pregnancy and childbirth. As a result, they are less likely to support their wives’ use of maternal
health care services [51,52]. It suggests that education is a major key strategy to increase mater-
nal and child health care service utilization.
In this study, the odds of home delivery among women who were not involved in WDA
were 1.65 times more likely to deliver at home as compared to women who were involved in
WDA. This finding is incongruent with a study conducted in Southern Ethiopia [53]. The pos-
sible reason might be that women who are not part of WDA are less likely to discuss their
health issues, including place of birth, among each other as well as with other health care pro-
viders. Moreover, scholars found that for women who live in an area with advanced WDA net-
works, the utilization of maternal health care services, including intuitional delivery, has
greatly improved [28,29].
The findings of this study revealed that fear of COVID-19 infection was another factor that
affected the place of delivery. Women who feared COVID-19 infection had 3.84 times higher
odds of delivering at home than women who did not fear COVID-19 infection. This finding
was consistent with a study done in India [32]. The reason behind this might be low awareness
about the preventive measures for COVID-19. In addition, a study conducted in Italy among
pregnant women found that there was a fear of visiting health institutions for delivery because
of the COVID-19 infection [54].
Conclusion
Even though the government tried to lower the rate of home delivery by accessing health insti-
tutions in remote areas, implementing WDA, and introducing maternal waiting home utiliza-
tion, nearly one in every three pregnant women had given birth at home among ANC-booked
women in their last pregnancy. Factors such as being a rural resident, husband’s education,
unmarried women, not being involved in WDA, and fear of acquiring COVID-19 infection
were found to be significant with home delivery. Improving the husband’s educational status,
providing information related to health institution delivery benefits during antenatal care, and
strengthening the implementation of the women’s development army, particularly among
rural and unmarried women, would decrease home childbirth practices. Future researchers
interested in the area should address why ANC-booked pregnant women preferred to deliver
at home through a qualitative approach, which might have a tremendous effect on institutional
service delivery utilization.
Supporting information
S1 File. Amharic version questionnaires.
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We thank the University of Gondar for approving the ethical clearance. We are also pleased to
extend our appreciation to the Gidan District administrative offices, study participants, data
collectors, and supervisors.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization: Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw.
Data curation: Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw, Eskedar Getie Mekonnen.
Formal analysis: Yohannes Ayanaw Habitu, Eskedar Getie Mekonnen, Wubshet Debebe
Negash.
Funding acquisition: Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw.
Investigation: Yohannes Ayanaw Habitu.
Methodology: Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw.
Software: Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw, Yohannes Ayanaw Habitu, Eskedar Getie Mekonnen.
Supervision: Eskedar Getie Mekonnen.
Visualization: Wubshet Debebe Negash.
Writing – original draft: Desale Bihonegn Asmamaw.
Writing – review & editing: Yohannes Ayanaw Habitu, Eskedar Getie Mekonnen, Wubshet
Debebe Negash.
References
1. Fenta SM, Ayenew G, Getahun BE: Magnitude of antenatal care service uptake and associated factors
among pregnant women: analysis of the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey. BMJ open
2021, 11(4):e043904.
2. Johnston R: Arsenic and the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Arsen Res Glob Sustain-Proc
6th Int Congr Arsen Environ AS 2016, 2016:12–14.
3. Organization WH: Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA,
World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division: executive summary. In.: World Health
Organization; 2019.
4. Ganchimeg T, Ota E, Morisaki N, Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Zhang J, et al: Pregnancy and child-
birth outcomes among adolescent mothers: a W orld H ealth O rganization multicountry study. BJOG:
An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2014, 121:40–48.
5. Berhan Y, Berhan A: Skilled health personnel attended delivery as a proxy indicator for maternal and
perinatal mortality: a systematic review. Ethiopian journal of health sciences 2014, 24:69–80. https://
doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v24i0.7s PMID: 25489184
6. Berhan Y, Berhan A: Antenatal care as a means of increasing birth in the health facility and reducing
maternal mortality: a systematic review. Ethiopian journal of health sciences 2014, 24:93–104. https://
doi.org/10.4314/ejhs.v24i0.9s PMID: 25489186
7. Organization WH: Making pregnancy safer: the critical role of the skilled attendant: a joint statement by
WHO, ICM and FIGO: World health organization; 2004.
8. Ethiopia C: Ethiopian demographic health survey, key indicators report. Maryland, USA: The DHS Pro-
gram ICF Rockville 2016.
9. Montagu D, Yamey G, Visconti A, Harding A, Yoong J: Where do poor women in developing countries
give birth? A multi-country analysis of demographic and health survey data. PloS one 2011, 6(2):
e17155. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017155 PMID: 21386886
10. Ali H, Mahmood QK, Jalil A, Fischer F: Women’s Status and its Association With Home Delivery: A
Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Maternal and child health journal
2022:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03294-1 PMID: 34982338
11. Arba MA, Darebo TD, Koyira MM: Institutional delivery service utilization among women from rural dis-
tricts of Wolaita and Dawro zones, southern Ethiopia; a community based cross-sectional study. PloS
one 2016, 11(3):e0151082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151082 PMID: 26986563
12. Health FMo: Management protocol on selected obstetrics topics. In.: Federal Democratic Republic of
Ethiopia; 2010.
13. Chinkhumba J, De Allegri M, Muula AS, Robberstad B: Maternal and perinatal mortality by place of
delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies. BMC public health
2014, 14(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1014 PMID: 25263746
14. Thind A, Mohani A, Banerjee K, Hagigi F: Where to deliver? Analysis of choice of delivery location from
a national survey in India. BMC public health 2008, 8(1):1–8.
15. NICEF:. Maternal and newborn health and COVID-19. UNICEF Data. 2020.
16. ICF E: Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019: Key Indicators. Rockville, Maryland, USA:
EPHI and ICF. 2019.
17. Kasaye HK, Endale ZM, Gudayu TW, Desta MS: Home delivery among antenatal care booked women
in their last pregnancy and associated factors: community-based cross sectional study in Debremarkos
town, North West Ethiopia, January 2016. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2017, 17(1):1–12.
18. Wodaynew T, Fekecha B, Abdisa B: Magnitude of home delivery and associated factors among antena-
tal care booked mothers in Delanta District, South Wollo Zone, North East Ethiopia: a cross-sectional
study, March 2018. Int J Womens Health Wellness 2018, 4(2):1–11.
19. Tessema ZT, Tiruneh SA: Spatio-temporal distribution and associated factors of home delivery in Ethio-
pia. Further multilevel and spatial analysis of Ethiopian demographic and health surveys 2005–2016.
BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2020, 20(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02986-w PMID:
32493302
20. Kifle MM, Kesete HF, Gaim HT, Angosom GS, Araya MB: Health facility or home delivery? Factors influ-
encing the choice of delivery place among mothers living in rural communities of Eritrea. Journal of
Health, Population and Nutrition 2018, 37(1):1–15.
21. Delibo D, Damena M, Gobena T, Balcha B: Status of home delivery and its associated factors among
women who gave birth within the last 12 months in east Badawacho District, Hadiya zone, Southern
Ethiopia. BioMed Research International 2020, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4916421 PMID:
32923481
22. Chernet AG, Dumga KT, Cherie KT: Home delivery practices and associated factors in Ethiopia. Journal
of reproduction & infertility 2019, 20(2):102. PMID: 31058055
23. Amano A, Gebeyehu A, Birhanu Z: Institutional delivery service utilization in Munisa Woreda, South East
Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2012, 12(1):1–6.
24. Ayele G, Tilahune M, Merdikyos B, Animaw W, Taye W: Prevalence and associated factors of home
delivery in Arbaminch Zuria district, southern Ethiopia: community based cross sectional study. Science
2015, 3(1):6–9.
25. Gidan Disrict Community Health Information System report. 2020.
26. Tsegay Y, Gebrehiwot T, Goicolea I, Edin K, Lemma H, Sebastian MS: Determinants of antenatal and
delivery care utilization in Tigray region, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. International journal for equity
in health 2013, 12(1):1–10.
27. Tadesse E: Antenatal care service utilization of pregnant women attending antenatal care in public hos-
pitals during the COVID-19 pandemic period. International journal of women’s health 2020, 12:1181.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S287534 PMID: 33335430
28. Admasu K-B, editor.: Health sector transformation plan (2015/16–2019/20). Ministry of Health Addis
Ababa 2015.
29. Negero MG, Mitike YB, Worku AG, Abota TL: Skilled delivery service utilization and its association with
the establishment of Women’s Health Development Army in Yeky district, South West Ethiopia: a multi-
level analysis. BMC research notes 2018, 11(1):1–9.
30. Senderowitz J: Making reproductive health services youth friendly: FOCUS on Young Adults; 1999.
31. Alemi Kebede KH, Teklehaymanot AN: Factors associated with institutional delivery service utilization
in Ethiopia. International journal of women’s health 2016, 8:463. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.
S109498 PMID: 27672342
32. Ghosh A, Nath R, Islam N: Choice of Place of Delivery during COVID-19 Pandemic: Observation from a
Community-Based Survey in Rural India. 2021.
33. Desta AA, Woldearegay TW, Gebremeskel E, Alemayehu M, Getachew T, et al: Impacts of COVID-19
on essential health services in Tigray, Northern Ethiopia: A pre-post study. Plos one 2021, 16(8):
e0256330. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256330 PMID: 34449773
34. Belsley DA: Conditioning Diagnostics Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression. Journal-operation
Research Society 1993, 44:88–88.
35. Hailu D, Tadele H, Tadesse BT, Alemayehu A, Abuka T, Woldegebriel F, et al: Home delivery practice
and its predictors in South Ethiopia. PloS one 2021, 16(8):e0254696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0254696 PMID: 34370742
36. Tadele N, Lamaro T: Utilization of institutional delivery service and associated factors in Bench Maji
zone, Southwest Ethiopia: community based, cross sectional study. BMC health services research
2017, 17(1):1–10.
37. Temesgen K, Wakgari N, Debelo BT, Tafa B, Alemu G, Wondimu F, et al: Maternal health care services
utilization amidstCOVID-19 pandemic in West Shoa zone, central Ethiopia. PLoS One 2021, 16(3):
e0249214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249214 PMID: 33770120
38. Pant S, Koirala S, Subedi M: Access to maternal health services during COVID-19. Europasian Journal
of Medical Sciences 2020, 2(2):46–50.
39. Akseer N, Wright J, Tasic H, Everett K, Scudder E, Amsalu R, et al: Women, children and adolescents
in conflict countries: an assessment of inequalities in intervention coverage and survival. BMJ global
health 2020, 5(1):e002214. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002214 PMID: 32133179
40. Ayenew AA, Nigussie AA, Zewdu BF: Childbirth at home and associated factors in Ethiopia: a system-
atic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Public Health 2021, 79(1):1–18.
41. Assefa Y, Gelaw YA, Hill PS, Taye BW, Van Damme W: Community health extension program of Ethio-
pia, 2003–2018: successes and challenges toward universal coverage for primary healthcare services.
Globalization and Health 2019, 15(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-019-0470-1 PMID:
30914055
42. Dadi TL, Bekele BB, Kasaye HK, Nigussie T: Role of maternity waiting homes in the reduction of mater-
nal death and stillbirth in developing countries and its contribution for maternal death reduction in Ethio-
pia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC health services research 2018, 18(1):1–10.
43. Kalule-Sabiti I, Amoateng AY, Ngake M: The effect of socio-demographic factors on the utilization of
maternal health care services in Uganda. African Population Studies 2014, 28(1):515–525.
44. Babalola S, Fatusi A: Determinants of use of maternal health services in Nigeria-looking beyond individ-
ual and household factors. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2009, 9(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/
1471-2393-9-43 PMID: 19754941
45. Mei D, Xiu C, Feng X, Wei Y: Study of the School–Residence Spatial Relationship and the Characteris-
tics of Travel-to-School Distance in Shenyang. Sustainability 2019, 11(16):4432.
46. Alemayehu M, Meskele M: Health care decision making autonomy of women from rural districts of
Southern Ethiopia: a community based cross-sectional study. International journal of women’s health
2017, 9:213. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S131139 PMID: 28458582
47. Girma F, Jira C, Girma B: Health services utilization and associated factors in jimma zone, South west
ethiopia. Ethiopian journal of health sciences 2011. PMID: 22435012
48. Bitew Workie S, Mekonen N, Michael MW, Molla G, Abrha S, Zema Z, et al: Modern Health Service Utili-
zation and Associated Factors among Adults in Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Environmental and Public
Health 2021, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8835780 PMID: 33505477
49. Idris S, Gwarzo U, Shehu A: Determinants of place of delivery among women in a semi-urban settle-
ment in Zaria, northern Nigeria. Annals of African medicine 2006, 5(2):68–72.
50. Agha S, Carton TW: Determinants of institutional delivery in rural Jhang, Pakistan. International journal
for equity in health 2011, 10(1):1–12.
51. Nduka I, Nduka E: Determinants of noninstitutional deliveries in an urban community in Nigeria. Journal
of Medical Investigations and Practice 2014, 9(3):102.
52. Adam IF: The influence of maternal health education on the place of delivery in conflict settings of Dar-
fur, Sudan. Conflict and Health 2015, 9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-015-0057-2 PMID:
26442130
53. Wondimu MS, Woldesemayat EM: Determinants of Home Delivery Among Women in Rural Pastoralist
Community of Hamar District, Southern Ethiopia: A Case–Control Study. Risk Management and Health-
care Policy 2020, 13:2159. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S268977 PMID: 33116994
54. de Freytas-Tamura K: Pregnant and scared of ‘Covid Hospitals,’they’re giving birth at home. The New
York Times 2020.