G.R. No. 221697. March 08, 2016 (Case Brief - Digest)

G.R. No. 221697.
March 08, 2016 (Case Brief / Digest)
Title: “Mary Grace Natividad S. Poe-Llamanzares vs. Commission on Elections and Estrella
C. Elamparo”
Facts:
The case involves Mary Grace Natividad S. Poe-Llamanzares (petitioner), a foundling
discovered in a church in Iloilo City, Philippines, who later became the adopted daughter of
celebrity couple Fernando Poe, Jr. and Susan Roces. Having pursued further studies and
settled in the United States, she eventually returned to the Philippines and pursued a career
in public service, culminating in her intention to run for the Philippine presidency. Her
candidacy was challenged on grounds of citizenship (being a foundling and her subsequent
acquisition of American citizenship which she later renounced under RA 9225) and
residency requirements as prescribed by law for presidential candidates.
The Commission on Elections (COMELEC) canceled Poe’s candidacy on the grounds that
she failed to meet the natural-born citizenship and ten-year residency requirements – she
claimed a residency period longer than what was stated in a previous Certificate of
Candidacy (COC) for her senate run. Poe contested the COMELEC’s resolutions, asserting
errors and grave abuse of discretion on their part.
Issues:
1. Whether or not the COMELEC committed grave abuse of discretion in canceling Poe’s
COC based on the grounds of not being a natural-born Filipino citizen and not meeting the
ten-year residency requirement.
2. Whether or not foundlings, like Poe, can be considered as natural-born Filipino citizens.
3. Whether or not Poe’s filing of her candidacy for president and her declaration of
residency period constituted false material representation.
Court’s Decision:
The Supreme Court GRANTED Poe’s petition, ANNULLING and SETTING ASIDE
COMELEC’s resolutions. The Court held that the COMELEC gravely abused its discretion
and exceeded its jurisdiction in disqualifying Poe based on her citizenship and residency.
1. On Citizenship – The Court declared that foundlings are presumed to be natural-born
citizens of the Philippines, following both the 1935 Constitution (in effect at the time of
Poe’s birth) and international law principles.
2. On Residency – The Court found that Poe was able to establish her intent to return and
reside permanently in the Philippines as of May 24, 2005. Even the discrepancy in her
declared residency in her COC for senator was not enough to misrepresent her qualification
© 2024 - batas.org | 1
G.R. No. 221697. March 08, 2016 (Case Brief / Digest)
to run for president.
Doctrine:
Foundlings are presumed to be natural-born citizens of the country where they are found,
applying the principle of jus soli or law of the soil as a generally accepted principle under
international law. This presumption is consistent with the intent of the framers of the 1935
Philippine Constitution and the country’s commitment under international covenants to
ensure the right of every child to acquire a nationality.
Class Notes:
– **Natural-born citizen**: A person who is a citizen from birth without having to perform
any act to acquire or perfect their Philippine citizenship.
– **Residency Requirement**: In election law, it refers to the period a candidate must have
resided in the country before the day of the election. The Court clarified that actual physical
presence, intent to remain in the country, and intent to abandon the previous domicile are
key elements in establishing residency for electoral purposes.
– **Grave Abuse of Discretion**: An arbitrary or despotic manner by which judgment is
exercised, which is equivalent to lack of jurisdiction. The COMELEC, in this case, was seen
to have exceeded its mandate when it disqualified Poe based on questioned citizenship and
residency requirements.
Historical Background:
The case of Mary Grace Natividad S. Poe-Llamanzares vs. Commission on Elections and
Estrella C. Elamparo is historically significant as it emphasized the rights of foundlings in
the Philippines regarding their citizenship status. It also underscores the nuances of
election laws on residency requirements, demonstrating the intersection of law,
humanitarian considerations, and the principles of justice and fairness in determining
qualification for public office. This decision mirrored the Supreme Court’s role in
interpreting the constitution and laws as they pertain to complex issues of citizenship and
eligibility for public service.
© 2024 - batas.org | 2

G.R. No. 221697. March 08, 2016 (Case Brief - Digest)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

G.R. No. 221697. March 08, 2016 (Case Brief - Digest)

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

G.R. No. 221697. March 08, 2016 (Case Brief - Digest)

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

G.R. No. 221697.

March 08, 2016 (Case Brief / Digest)

to run for president.

You might also like