Milling Proposal
Milling Proposal
Milling Proposal
Proposal on
By
Advisor
Tepi, Ethiopia
August , 2024
Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE ............................................................................................................................. 3
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 3
4.Work plan................................................................................................................................... 10
5.Budget ........................................................................................................................................ 11
References ..................................................................................................................................... 12
CHAPTER ONE
1. Introduction
Any part of a plant that may be consumed raw or cooked is referred to as a vegetable. As the
cheapest and most plentiful possible source of protein, leafy greens are highly valued in Africa
due to their economic potential and capacity to manufacture amino acids from a range of
fundamental materials [1], [2], [3]. Leafy crops can withstand abiotic conditions like heat and
drought [4]. They are extremely perishable, especially when kept at room temperature. Because of
their large surface area, the leaves are more susceptible to moisture loss. When cooked, the result
is a loss of crispiness, wilting, and hardness [5]. Vegetables improve the taste and consumption of
our primary foods. They also provide most of the nutrients lacking in other food sources, such as
calcium and iron, and minerals.
Generally, a balanced diet and addressing nutritional deficits require vegetables [1]. A tropical
vine known as the "fluted pumpkin" (Telfairia occidentalis), also known as "Ugu" by the Igbo
ethnic group of Eastern Nigeria, is grown there for its edible seeds and as a leafy vegetable [6],
[7]. It is a lowgrowing creeping leafy vegetable with long, twisted tendrils and huge lobed leaves
[8]. Amaranthus hybridus, also called green amaranth, is cultivated as a green vegetable in parts
of India, Mexico, the southern United States, and Africa [9], [10], [11], [12]. The leaves are rich
in protein and contain much energy. While in season, amaranth leaves give some African tribes up
to 25% of their daily protein [13]. Young seedlings are pulled up by the roots and picked in West
Africa before being sold in markets. These are the boiled greens that Africans eat the most
frequently. According to [4], the use of local leafy vegetables is dwindling in favor of exotic crops.
This is because they are not usually cultivated but mostly gathered.
Slicing, cutting, crushing, chopping, grinding, and milling are different size reduction methods.
They can be achieved mechanically without altering the material's chemical properties [14].
Cutting is the penetration of a sharp knife through a material, resulting in a new surface and smaller
sizes required for a particular purpose. Several methods have been devised, but these methods have
not been helpful in efficiently enhancing the slicing operation, as most of the machines are
manually operated, and there are no rollers (for compression) in others. [15] reported that cutting
force and specific energy studies on different vegetables help to design the appropriate slicing or
cutting devices and that the cutting tool parameters also influence the shape of the final output.
[16] reported that the variation in the width of slices was greater in motorized slicers because the
feeding could not be adequately controlled, and the cutting force required for slicing was 1.121N.
Therefore, the main objective of this research is to develop a leafy vegetable-slicing machine. It
was in recognition of the need to remove drudgery, avoid user harm and associated hardships,
minimize losses, and get the most out of vegetables economically that there arose the need for a
motorized leafy vegetable slicing machine that is made of slicing blades enclosed in a slicing drum
to ease problems related to manual slicing of leafy vegetables, thereby enhancing long shelf life
and mass production of sliced vegetables at a faster and easier rate.
1.4.1Specific Objectives
To achieve the above mentioned general objective, the project includes the following specific
objectives: -
Significantly the miller that we have designed is simple in construction and well modified the
machine for easy understanding of the operation and cost minimization. Anyone can operate this
machine easily there is no need of special skill therefore the everyone can easily operates.
CHAPTER TWO
2. Literature review
A manual vegetable slicing device was designed and built by [17]. The device was made out of a
hopper, a drum for slicing, blades, a discharge chute, a handle, and a frame. The vegetable was
reduced to its smallest size by the rotating motion of the cutters (slicing blades) from the handle,
and the sliced vegetable was collected at the discharge chute.
For small-scale food processing, [18] designed a motorized leafy vegetable cutter. Frame, loading
chamber, discharge chute, cutting blades, and power transmission unit made up the machine.
Vegetables supplied into the loading chamber were transported via the hopper to the cutting
chamber, where they were sliced into a variety of sizes by the spinning action of the cutting blades.
The automated leafy vegetable cutter designed by [18] was assessed by [19]. When put to the test,
the green vegetable cutting machine had an output of 29 kg/h with an efficiency of more than 80%.
The manual tomato slicing device designed by [20] was redesign by [21]. The same operating
theory was applied. The new machine has improvements such as better cutting blades, a collecting
unit, and the usage of aluminum in place of wood for machine components. The device's
production capacity and slicing efficiency were 92% and 3.012 kg/h, respectively. A motorized
machine for slicing fluted pumpkin leaves was designed by [16]. The device was composed of a
frame, a rubber belt conveyor, a three-bladed cutting disc, a driving shaft, a bearing assembly, and
a power drive mechanism (gear). The device has a 6.67 kg/h capacity and a 73.2% efficiency.
[22] developed a slicer machine for slicing bananas and potatoes, assessed in terms of slicing
capacity, broken percentage, and uniform slicing. Around 68.78 kg of bananas and 91.8 kg of
potatoes may be sliced each hour on average, respectively.
A vegetable-slicing device designed by [23] was discovered to have a 1.717 kg/h capacity. [24]
designed a manually operated potato-slicing machine with the goal of increasing process
throughput and efficiency. The weight of the sliced vegetable divided by the weight of the
vegetable before slicing was used to calculate the machine's capacity and efficiency, which were
found to be 42.93 kg/h and 88.8% respectively.
A fruit and vegetable slicing machine with a 96 kg/h capacity and a 70% efficiency was designed
by [25]. [26] created a prototype vegetable cutter that was tested on carrots. The cutter was
constructed with a 0.5 hp, 1400 rpm motor, a 30 kg/h cutting capacity, and an 86% efficiency.
A mechanical tomato slicer designed by [27] feeds tomatoes to revolving blades using a gravity
feeding method. The machine's efficiency and capacity were determined using a 0.25 hp and 1200
rpm motor, the machine's capacity and efficiency were determined to be 468 kg/h and 60.34%,
respectively. For greater effectiveness, it was advised that the knife carriage be strengthened.
For small-scale food processing businesses, [28] developed a power-operated banana slicer with
an emphasis on the cutter assembly. The cutter plate and the cutting blade make up the assembly.
It was powered by a 360 rpm motor. The machine's efficiency was determined to be 93% and its
effective capacity to be 100 kg/h.
Cutting force, according to [29] increased with increasing load speed, while shear energy remained
constant. Knife cutting angles from 00 to 400 sharpening angles resulted in a decrease in cutting
power, strength, energy values, and specific energy values. The maximum cutting force
measurement was recorded by a knife with a sharpening angle of 17.50, and the lowest by a knife
with a sharpening angle of 2.50
[30] Claim that when the speed of the slicing disc rose, mechanical damage reduced and efficiency
and throughput capacity improved. The findings of the experiment were as follows: the greatest
value of throughput capacity was 184.11 kg/h, the highest value of slicing efficiency was 99.88%,
and the mechanical damage index value decreased from 16.05% at 300 rpm to 0.30% at 1200 rpm.
CHAPTER THREE
3.1 Methodology
Data collection
Secondary data was collected by assessing the previous different literature reviews about
vegetable milling machine by reading different reference books, from website, from
internet access and from different handbooks, journals and articles.
Literature survey
In this process we used various books, journals, websites and articles which considering
about vegetable milling machine.
Modeling of the machine
1. Mechanical properties: The material selected should have the necessary strength, toughness,
hardness, and ductility to withstand the operational stresses and loads placed on the machine
components.
3. Wear resistance: Components that are subject to wear and friction should be made from
materials with high wear resistance to prolong their lifespan and reduce maintenance needs.
4. Temperature resistance: If the machine operates at high temperatures, materials with good
thermal conductivity and heat resistance should be used to prevent deformation or failure.
5. Cost considerations: The selected material should strike a balance between performance and
cost to ensure that it is cost-effective for the intended application.
6. Machinability: Materials that are easy to machine and shape should be selected to reduce
manufacturing time and costs.
7. Availability: The chosen material should be readily available in the required quantities and
forms to ensure timely production and maintenance of the machine components.
design
Data collection literature survey analysis
Figure 3. 1 methodology
4.Work plan
September
February
January
August
march
Tasks
April
June
May
July
No
1 Problem
identification
2 Literature
review
3 Design
calculation
4 Modeling
5 Finalizing
5.Budget
2 Pen 4 25 100
3 Fixer 4 50 200
4 Rubber 20 80
8 Cover page 2 10 20
9 Scale ( Ruler) 1 60 60