Meki SP Physical Study Final
Meki SP Physical Study Final
Meki SP Physical Study Final
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BY: BERISO B
JULY, 2022
FINFINNE, OROMIA
i
Table of Contents
List of Figure................................................................................................................................................ iv
List of Table .................................................................................................................................................. v
CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 Objective of the study ............................................................................................................................. 2
1.2.1. General objectives ....................................................................................................................... 2
1.2.2. Specific objectives ...................................................................................................................... 2
1.3 .Basic Research questions ................................................................................................................... 2
1.4. Significance of the study .................................................................................................................... 3
1.5 Scope of the Study .............................................................................................................................. 3
1.6 Limitation of the study ........................................................................................................................ 3
1.7. Organization of the paper................................................................................................................... 3
1.8. Sources of data ................................................................................................................................... 4
1.9 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 4
1.10. Methods of Data Analysis ................................................................................................................ 4
CHAPTER TWO .......................................................................................................................................... 5
2. REVIEW LITERATURE ......................................................................................................................... 5
2.2 Relative Location ................................................................................................................................ 7
2.3. Absolute Location .......................................................................................................................... 8
2.4 Physical Planning: ............................................................................................................................... 9
2.4.1Vision: ......................................................................................................................................... 10
2.4.3 Functions of Physical Planning:..................................................................................................... 10
2.4.4. Importance & Benefits of Physical Planning: ............................................................................... 11
2.5. Site and Situation of Meki ............................................................................................................... 11
2. 5.1 Site ............................................................................................................................................ 11
2.5.2 Site factors contributing to the growth and development of Meki ............................................. 11
2.5.3 Some physical challenges in and the surrounding of Meki ........................................................ 12
2.6 Situation ............................................................................................................................................ 13
2.6.1 The Importance of Site and Situation in Today's Cities ............................................................. 14
ii
2.7 Location and Sustainable Development: Location is important factor: ............................................ 15
2.8 Area ................................................................................................................................................... 15
2.9 Shape ................................................................................................................................................. 16
2. 10 Canter and Sub-Canter ................................................................................................................... 17
2.10.1 Canter ....................................................................................................................................... 17
2.11. Topography .................................................................................................................................... 22
2.11.1 Altitudinal classification .......................................................................................................... 22
2.12 Climatic Conditions ........................................................................................................................ 26
2.12.1 Temperature ............................................................................................................................. 26
2.12.2 Rainfall ..................................................................................................................................... 28
2.12.3 Wind direction ......................................................................................................................... 30
2.12.4 Drainage ................................................................................................................................... 32
2.12 River ................................................................................................................................................ 33
2.13 Soil .................................................................................................................................................. 34
2.14 Vegetation ....................................................................................................................................... 35
2.15. Future expansion direction ............................................................................................................. 35
2.15.1. Urban Growth to the West ...................................................................................................... 35
2.15.2. Urban Growth to the East........................................................................................................ 36
Urban growth to the east is impossible because the town has a wide agricultural potential area at the
eastern, southeastern bounded by Dambal Lake. .................................................................................... 36
2.15.3. Urban Growth to the South ......................................................................................................... 36
CHAPTER THREE .................................................................................................................................... 40
3.1 General Market ................................................................................................................................. 40
2.10.1 Market Hierarchy ..................................................................................................................... 40
3.1.2 Cattle market .............................................................................................................................. 41
3.2 Bus Terminal and Freight Terminal .................................................................................................. 44
3.3. Freight Transport ............................................................................................................................. 45
3.3.1. The components of an airport ................................................................................................... 46
3.3.2. Airport Site Selection ................................................................................................................ 46
3.4. Congestion and Car Accidents ......................................................................................................... 48
3.5. Transportation of the Study town..................................................................................................... 49
3.5.1. Intra-urban transport ................................................................................................................. 49
iii
3.5.2. Inter-urban Transport ................................................................................................................ 50
3.6. Road ................................................................................................................................................. 50
3.7. Natural and Man-made Constraints for future Development of the Town ...................................... 51
3.8. Public utilities of Meki town............................................................................................................ 52
3.5.1. Electric services ........................................................................................................................ 52
4.1. Planning issues and Recommendations ........................................................................................... 53
List of Figure
Figure 1 : Astronomical location of Meki Town ............................................................................ 9
Figure 2: Rapid urban growth triad ............................................................................................... 15
Figure 3: Shape of Meki Town ..................................................................................................... 17
Figure 4: concept of concentric and polycentric ........................................................................... 20
Figure 5: Urban connectivity ....................................................................................................... 20
Figure 6: Meki town Proposed sub center .................................................................................... 21
Figure 7: DEM of Meki Town ...................................................................................................... 23
Figure 8: Slope distribution of Meki town .................................................................................... 24
Figure 9: Dominating wind direction of town .............................................................................. 32
Figure 10: Protective Buffer along Water Bodies and Forest ....................................................... 34
Figure 11: Future expansion direction of Meki Town ................................................................. 37
Figure 12: Incompatibility of land uses from previous plan ......................................................... 39
Figure 13: Proposed fruit and vegetable Market Town ............................................................... 41
Figure 14: Proposed Bus station of Meki town ............................................................................ 45
Figure 15: Natural and manmade Constraint Map of Meki Town................................................ 51
iv
List of Table
v
CHAPTER ONE
1.1. INTRODUCTION
The growth and development of an urban center has to create and promote conducive and
sustainable economy, social and environment for urban dwellers. The growth and diversity of
population will determine future sound progress. The capacity town and potential of future
growth of town is to attract and maintain to satisfy urban dwellers as well as new comers for
them to work and live in it. In spite of striving and struggling of all stakeholders for growth and
development, the town has also faced wide dimension of opportunities and challenges.
The growth of the Meki town has generated from the urbanization of universal share common
conditions in range of opportunities in economic, social and cultural. The town has engines of
economic growth and creates livelihood opportunities for diverse religious and sub-cultural
groups and communities for making life. Challenges, on the other hand are numerous, range
from the complexity of providing equitable economic opportunities and access to social services
to all, to securing safe places and making the urban environment healthy and sustainable. The
town of Meki reflects these dynamics which encompassing most of the economic prospects,
livelihood opportunities and services and accommodating for a diverse population that reflects
the different religious and sectarian belongings, socio-economic groups, cultures and also
nationalities. This has contribution to enriching the cultural diversity in the town.
The growth of Meki town presents enormous challenges to the government. Not only for the
markets essential for the prosperity of rural areas, but they can also provide additional economic
growth, opportunities, and improved access to education and health for the surrounding region.
Town planning is a scientific art of ordering the use of land and site of building and
communication routes so as to secure the maximum degree of economy. It aims at securing of a
sensible and accepted blend of conservation and exploitation of land as the background or stage
for human activity. The main objective of this study was to assess the existing conditions of
Meki town in relation with its physical settings, historical background and socio-economic
aspects. An over – arching aim of the government, as expressed in the 2008 Proclamation for
1
urban planning, is to promote a balanced urban growth with a multi – centered and urban system
developed at regional level through small, medium –sized and large towns as market, service and
economic centers. This is realized through the preparation of urban plans.
One of the ultimate goals of urban plan preparation and implementation is allocation of plots for
various land use functions. Allocation of plot for various functions ought to be carried out in an
orderly and rational manner in order to ensure not only consistency but also efficient utilization
of the scare resource of land. The establishment and use of minimum desirable standards are
essential if development is to proceed in an orderly and rational manner and the most efficient
and productive use is to be made of land resources. Needless to say, land uses in a structure plan
ought to be proposed taking in to account compatibility of adjacent land uses or compatibility of
different land uses which would be proposed close to each other. To this end, the physical study
at urban level has a paramount importance in identifying such incompatible land uses and link to
standards.
2
How to examine plan related problems of municipal services?
How to identify main centre and sub-centre?
How to identify the slope of the town and its plain areas?
What is the natural and man-made constraint for future growth of the town?
How to proposing planning solution to improving the issues?
3
1.8. Sources of data
The sources of data were both primary and secondary sources. The primary data sources were
mainly obtained through field observations in the existing and expansion areas. During filed
observation the base map prepared for preparation of the structure plan of Meki town(sep,2022)
was used and the physical and the municipal services were up dated or cross checked with those
on the ground and validated for the analysis.
In addition to the primary data sources secondary data were gathered from Meki town
Municipality, sector offices of such as trade, market and transport, and Ethiopian Electric
Service. Digital elevation model 30 meter was also utilized to analyze topographic elements
within the town boundary. Climate analysis was based on data obtained from Meteorological
data obtained from National Meteorological Agency. On the other hand, there are also secondary
data sources obtained from different reference books both in hard and soft copy (internet
sources) formats.
1.9 Methodology
The spatial data for the preparation of the base map of Meki town was collected through ground
survey using total station, differential GPS, recent aerial photo (March, 2022). For topographic
elements (Contour, Slope, and elevation) analysis GIS tools were used and planning inputs were
obtained both for the physical and municipal services that are used in the revision of Meki town.
Important maps like contour map, slope map, constraint map, altitude range map, Meki
Neighborhood-center map and etc. are prepared using GIS software tools. Data is also expressed
by graphs, figures and tables. Handheld GPS was also used to identify and show location of
paces on maps.
4
CHAPTER TWO
2. REVIEW LITERATURE
There are various terms used to describe the general structure plan process, including Master
Planning, Development Framework Plan etc. While the nature of these plans may differ slightly
depending on the primary focus and scale of the plan, the overall structure planning analysis
process is largely the same.
Issues that may be managed through a structure plan pertaining physical planning include:
Urban consolidation and greenfield expansion
The type and location of land uses that will be permitted, including development type,
density and staging
Multi-modal transport links and connectivity (such as road, rail, sea and air links, public
transport, cycle and pedestrian access)
The location, type, scale and staging of infrastructure required to service an area,
including storm water, water and sewerage
Integration of new development and growth with infrastructure and existing urban
development
Landscape character and amenity
5
Reserves and open space networks
Natural hazards
The provision of community facilities
The protection of sites, features or values (which may be cultural, ecological, historical or
amenity related)
Areas of contamination
Provision and location of network utilities.
The planning process in urban areas tends to be more complex and prone to conflict and
contestation. Land values are higher, property ownership is more complex, and flexibility to
change land uses is often more limited. It is important to acknowledge that land use planning is
going through a paradigm shift across the world. From an earlier, purist approach of exclusive
zones for specific uses (e.g., residential, commercial), there is a shift toward appropriate mixes of
compatible uses (e.g., residential with small businesses, institutional with offices). From an
earlier approach of flat, low-density urban development, there is a shift toward more compact
cities with variable density correlated with urban transport systems.
Other distinctive characteristics of urban planning include the following.
Developed or built-up areas predominate. Therefore, the land use plan needs to reflect
and plan for diverse land uses.
The demand for infrastructure will be higher (in both quantitative and qualitative terms)
and the provision of infrastructure more complex and costly. Therefore, housing
reconstruction must be closely coordinated with the development of infrastructure.
Urban land use planning has an immediate and highly visible impact on urban land
values. Therefore, a transparent approach to planning is essential.
Urban areas are more likely to have agencies that undertake planning and regulation as
well as professionals for design and supervision.
Investments in urban settlements and infrastructure during reconstruction should
contribute to already establish urban development goals.
Development control and regulation systems are usually present in urban areas but tend
to be flawed and complicated, creating high incentives for noncompliance.
The major physical planning concerns are:
6
2.1. Ecological considerations for land use planning
Examine the impacts of local decisions in a regional context.
Plan for long-term change and unexpected events.
Preserve rare landscape elements, critical habitats, and associated species.
Avoid land uses that deplete natural resources over a broad area.
Retain large contiguous or connected areas that contain critical habitats.
Minimize the introduction and spread of non-native species.
Avoid or compensate for effects of development on ecological processes.
a. Implement land-use and -management practices that are compatible with the natural potential
2.1.2. Concerned about the regional nature of urban policy
This principle expresses the fact that urban policy is integrally incorporated into regional policy and into the policy
of economic, social and territorial cohesion.
2.1.3. Polycentric development of the population pattern
One of the problems of developments in the population structure is a tendency towards the
excessive concentration of development activities in a few large urban centers. In this respect,
the purpose of promoting polycentric development is to ensure that the growth and development
of these urban areas does not progress at the expense of other medium-sized and smaller towns.
2.1.4. Strategic and integrated approach to urban development
Competitive towns must provide their citizens with adequate opportunities, services and quality of life, based on
efficient transportation, reasonable infrastructure, and a healthy environment.
2.1.5. Promotion of the development of towns as development poles in a territory
Sustainable urban development is determined by three dimensions economic prosperity, a sound environment and
social cohesion.
7
The town shared common border lines with the vicinal rural villages of Jawwee Bofo and Fila in
the north, Qorke Adi and Girisa in the south, Shubi Gamo and Baqale in the east and Giraba and
Oda in the west.
8
Figure 1 : Astronomical location of Meki Town
Physical Planning in its broadest sense refers to a set of actions aimed at improving the
Physical, Social and Economic welfare of a place and its dwellers.
It entails the organization of land uses so that people enjoy the highest achievable degree
of efficiency in resource utilization, functionality of places and aesthetic quality.
The main concerns of Urban Planning therefore include spatial orderliness, aesthetics of
the urban places, efficiency of operations in the social, economic and other arena, and
most importantly, man‘s well-being.
9
2.4.1Vision:
To attain orderly, progressive, sustainable urban and rural development as a framework for
industrialization; provision of social and physical infrastructure, agriculture modernization and
therefore poverty eradication.
2.4.2. Mission:
10
2.4.4. Importance & Benefits of Physical Planning:
Helpful in the fight against urban and rural poverty.
Helps to address environmental problems.
Helps to maximize the use of land and other resources.
Facilitates orderly development.
Introduces beauty in our settlements.
Separates incompatible land uses.
Eases service provision.
Plans can be used as a fundraising tool.
Helps to improve property values.
Deals with natural selfishness among developers and thus reduces nuisances.
Helps conserve/preserve important features/areas.
Sensitization of the public in support of development efforts.
Protects water catchment areas and protects underground water reserves.
Fertile land.
Natural resource potentials (rocks, sand, soil and etc.)
2.5.2.2 Climate
11
2.5.2.3 Economic factors
flatten Terrain
Wetland(Swampy)
Gully erosion
12
2.6 Situation
Situation is defined as the location of a place relative to its surroundings, other places and water
bodies. Factors included in an area's situation are the accessibility of the location, the extent of a
place's connections with another, and how close an area may be to raw materials if they are not
located specifically on the site.
13
Route center towards eastern, South, central and southeastern parts of the country Close
to national and international markets.
Near to excess crop producing zones and districts of koka, Mojo and eastern shewa
14
Figure 2: Rapid urban growth triad
space and development are the two sides of the same coin of societal concern
therefore providing site plan (location of plot) for dweller owned plot of land
contributes to sustainable development
2.8 Area
The structure plan of Meki town was prepared in 2004C E .C and the planning boundary covers
land area of 2627.32hectares. The current structure plan revision of Meki town increases the area
of the town to 3282hectares (OUPI, surveying 2022 G.C). The current structure plan of the town
expands physically 654.68 hectares. Implies that Meki town not efficiently used their planning
boundary it showed that not tremendous physical growth. However, almost all economic
15
activities, business, commercial, administrative functions, transport infrastructures, social
services and etc. are concentrated at the downtown (CBD) and intermediate parts of the town.
The main factors for the rapid growth of Meki town briefly explained in the following figure.
2.9 Shape
There are varieties of compactness measures hectares-perimeter measurement approach is used.
C=
Where (C) is the compactness values (P) perimeter: is squared to remove the scaling effect, and,
(A) is the area of shape .The values of C ranges between 0 and 1. A shape with high value of C is
considered to be more compact than a shape with lower C. A circle is the most compact shape
and it will have a compactness value of 1.
Perimeter (P) of Meki structural plan is 32818.994467 meter and area (A) is 65167712m2.
( )
⁼ =1
The area-perimeter measurement approach for Meki structure plan boundary has compactness
measure of 1unit which implies it is less compact shape. The compact unit is bigger the average
distance between any two point stand, this is true in Meki .Therefore, to minimize the impact of
distance, time and cost for travel from one point to the other point fair distribution of
infrastructures and establishing additional sub-centres at suitable area to minimize commuting
and increase livability and have faire distribution of land uses that activate a given locality
16
Figure 3: Shape of Meki Town
17
Structure remained the same as the town expanded outward. It was still a mono centric town, but
residential densities no longer declined at a rapid pace with distance from the town center. They
now declined at a slower pace, as the low-density suburban periphery was gradually filled in and
rebuilt at higher densities. A third and more radical transformation, from the mono centric to the
polycentric town, began in the middle decades of the twentieth century with the rapid increase in
the use of cars, buses, and trucks. Trucks, in particular, allowed for the dispersal of industrial
workplaces, but commercial and service workplaces in most cities remained concentrated in
central areas. The current urban growth of Meki town is characterized by centralization and
horizontal expansion, which means that development activities usually spread along sides of the
main roads that connect the town center and residential areas. For example: around the main
center, from Meki town Administration office to commercial Bank, Tele communication, and,
different residential areas and etc , are concentrated in the centers. Another problem regarding to
mono centric in Meki town is that highly overcrowded and traffic congestion .This centralization
or mono-centric development pattern caused many impacts and problems to the town,
particularly intensive downtown traffic, dense administrative functions and economic activities
away from the residential districts and the new expansion areas.
In the light of the expected Meki town development and population growth, the downtown area
and its current economic axes may fail to satisfy the future demand on employment opportunities
and other requirements of good life. Meki town structure plan should adopt decentralization of
pulled activities through establishment of sub-centers to distribute the economic activities,
administrative services, and housing among new residential areas.
The development of road network and transportation causes population and employment
decentralization. Transportation influences the spatial pattern of decentralized employment by
the emergence of sub-centers
The formation of these sub-centers could change the linear center growth of the town. Linear
centers are formed and found at the foci of cities and towns, are today strung out along the
highways of the region, forming the so-called commercial strip. Commercial, institutional,
service, office, industrial and warehouse functions all locate her. Strip exhibit congested traffic
and a shabby environment, and yet are one of the most visible features of the public town. They
are universally condemned.
18
Each sub-center serves as sector of the town and represents a hub for high quality basic services
and activities offered to the residents within each sub-town. These centers are expected to
provide public and private jobs including the administrative and government center, and the
economic activities, offices, companies, banks, housing centers, social, cultural and
entertainment services in addition to densely populated center. Therefore, to accelerate the
vibrant growth of Meki town in addition to the main center other sub-centers should be not such
important because the town is compacted and not fulfill sub- center criteria, proposed road
network in order to support the town connectivity with periphery to bring about balanced town
development. The current urban growth of Meki town is characterized by centralization and
horizontal expansion, which means that development activities usually spread along sides of the
main roads that connect the town center and residential areas. Meki town structure plan should
adopt decentralization of pulled activities through establishment of road network to distribute the
economic activities, administrative services, and housing among new residential areas.
Therefore, to accelerate the vibrant growth of Meki town in addition to the main center other
Neighborhood center should be proposed in order to support the town center to bring about
balanced town development. The current urban growth of Meki town is characterized by
centralization and horizontal expansion, which means that development activities usually spread
along sides of the main roads that connect the town center and residential areas. Therefore, Meki
town structure plan should adopt decentralization of pulled activities through establishment of
Neighborhood center to distribute the economic activities, administrative services, and housing
among new residential areas
19
Figure 4: concept of concentric and polycentric
20
Figure 6: Meki town Proposed sub center
21
2.11. Topography
2.11.1 Altitudinal classification
The relief of Meki town is somewhat a hindrance for infrastructure development. This is because
of suitable topography except few areas that have rugged topography. The elevation of Meki
town ranges from 1683 to 1610 meters. This implies that there is no large altitudinal variation
(73meters) between the lowest and highest points of the town from where flush water originates
affecting areas with low elevation. To minimize flood risks of the town, areas that are along the
edges of seasonal streams or marshy areas should be protected and restricted for settlement. It is
also vital to protect the highest spot or landmark of the town as it serves as watershed. Thus, the
highest spot (landmark) of the town that is found in the northeastern extreme of the town should
be proposed for recreation to protect the area from any incompatible uses and to enjoy the
scenery of the town from this sit
22
Figure 7: DEM of Meki Town
23
Figure 8: Slope distribution of Meki town
24
Allotments (NV) Land Use and Development Plan 4 Working Paper – Land Use Suitability
analysis, Jan, 2009.
The gradient of land has an effect up on the economic activity of an area and determines the land
use pattern of the given site. According to the standard set there are seven categories of urban
land slope value in percentage. The first category of slope value is 0 – 2% and this slope is found
in north east areas and in eastern areas of the site in little amount. It covers about 441.83hectares
of land and where it found in wide coverage agricultural land and water body of Swamp Meki.
The second category of slope is 2 – 5% and this slope value covers 791.67 hectares of land of the
site this slope is found in East ,south west and northeast, since it has little inclination of gradient
it is better than the slope value of 0 -2%. The other slope value of the site is 5 –10% and this
kind of slope is dominantly found in central to the south direction and north of the site, generally
at the centers of the town. It covers about 1538.98 hectares of land and better for constructional
development than the above slope values. The slope value of 10– 15% is also found in the site
and it covers 456.28 hectares of land. It found in north east, center and south-east of the site. The
other category of slope value is 15 -20% and it dominantly found in few areas of southwest,
north and northwest part of the site. It covers 50.2 hectares of land of the project site. The other
type of the slope value of this site is above 20% and this type of slope is found in the east,
southeast and where the gorge is found. It covers 3.04 hectares of land of the project site. See the
following map and table.
Table 1: Slope Patterns and their Development Suitability
Slope category (%) Description Development Suitability
25
Table 2: Slope Classification and Area Covered in Percent in Meki town
2.12.1 Temperature
Since Ethiopia is a tropical country theoretically temperature is supposed to be uniformly high
throughout the year but this condition is modified by the existing relief of the area. Thus in
26
Metrological station-Batu Town) conventionally this is characteristic of sub-tropical climate.
Thus, the mean maximum and minimum monthly and mean annual temperature of the study
town is summarized as seen in. The analysis of mean monthly minimum and maximum and
mean average annual temperature of the town shows that the town has experienced a hot
temperature that can be categorized in the temperate/ sub-tropical climatic zone. Therefore, to
make the environment more comfort good amount of land should allotted to urban
Greenery and, Meki town has warm temperature that to a lesser extent needs room cooling
intervention whenever the temperature tends to rise above 22.40c. Apart from this, proposing
land for residential purposes should be carried out by considering maintenance of optimum
temperature to get adequate humidity. For this case, the use of a maximum plot size standard is
recommended.
27
Table 3: Distribution of Mean monthly minimum temperature of Meki Town
mean monthly temperature (In Degree Celsius)
Winter Spring Summer Autumn
Year J F M A M J J A S O N D Year
2003 11.6 14.0 14.0 13.2 12.9 12.2 12.1 12.2 11.1 10.5 6.3 5.7 11.3
2004 7.3 7.2 12.4 12.3 12.2 12.0 11.7 11.0 11.2 11.3 7.2 4.9 10.1
2005 4.2 4.3 7.3 10.7 10.0 10.9 11.0 10.7 10.1 9.5 6.5 5.5 8.5
2006 6.7 9.1 13.1 11.7 13.4 13.3 13.6 13.4 12.3 11.5 9 8.5 11.3
2007 10.7 10.4 13.6 13 12.8 13 12.9 12.3 11.9 11.2 8.8 11.9 11.9
2008 10.6 11.5 13 13.2 12.1 12.1 13 12.6 12.3 9.5 8.8 8.5 11.4
2009 12 11.2 11.1 13.5 12.7 13.4 12.8 13 11.3 8.9 7.6 4.2 11
2010 7.2 8.1 12.3 11.9 11.7 12.3 12.8 12.7 12.2 10.9 7.8 6.7 10.6
2011 9.3 11.0 12.1 11 12.2 10.4 9.7 13.0 11.3 10.6 7.5 5.7 10.3
2012 8.0 9.1 9.9 9.8 9.2 9.3 8.3 9.6 8.6 6.2 5.2 4.7 8.2
8.8 10 11.9 12 11.9 11.9 11.8 12.1 11.2 10 7.5 6.6 10.5
MMMT
Seasonal 8.5 11.9 11.9 9.6
Source: Ethiopian Meteorological Agency, 2003-2012
2.12.2 Rainfall
Meki town is characterized by bimodal type of rainfall with mean annual rainfall of 86.4mm. It
occurs during autumn and spring. During this time, wind blows from Indian Ocean to most
28
southeastern lowlands and highlands of Ethiopia bringing rainfall to the region. The town and
the hinterland areas also get rainfall during the rainy season although the amount is smaller than
rainfall of autumn and spring. Refer to the table below. The rainfall coefficient is found to be
above 60% that indicated consistency and reliability of annual rainfall in the study area.
Therefore, the climatic condition of Meki town shows that the temperature is free of any
discomforting living and working environment. However, as it is cooler in certain months of the
year, it is better to use the lowest standard size of plots for residential development in order to
create dense settlement per neighborhoods. On the other hand, the presence of adequate annual
rainfall is likely to endow the town with different potential resources related to urban agriculture
activities, surface and groundwater potentials, and the like. Thus, proposing ample area for urban
agriculture, conducting watershed management practices along ridges and proposing of buffer
zone along river banks as well as protection of flooding and conservation of wetlands are
recommended to be incorporated in the spatial land-use plan.
29
Table 5: Monthly Rainfall (mm)
Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2001 5.5 0.0 28.5 2.4 44.2 110.3 85.0 63.8 72.0 133.8 0.0 0.0
2002 0.0 0.0 3.0 65.2 97.3 34.0 215.5 95.7 106.9 31.1 1.2 24.2
2003 0.0 0.0 107.8 28.2 131.7 78.3 137.4 130.6 54.6 0.1 0.0 1.8
2004 12.0 21.8 37.9 55.6 51.1 48.0 94.6 73.6 61.7 0.0 0.0 1.3
2005 21.2 0.3 98.0 127.1 21.3 82.9 221.7 156.7 101.0 0.0 3.2 17.4
2006 92.0 0.8 23.8 150.3 0.0 94.1 176.7 129.6 92.7 10.9 2.7 0.0
2007 35.3 14.3 48.4 100.8 184 55.4 103 91.5 140.2 4.6 1.4 0.0
2008 1.0 15.8 39.1 197.5 45.0 137.9 185.6 65.0 72.8 9.5 0.0 7.3
2009 10.5 46.1 22.7 59.6 166 137 195.1 83.3 59.3 22.7 1.6 0
2010 0 0.4 8.7 2.2 80.3 112.2 292.3 194.2 62.6 65.0 224.2 x
2011 64.8 0.0 51.0 11.9 55.3 50.5 187.1 79.4 60.6 136.1
AARF 24.23 9.95 46.89 80.08 87.62 94.06 189.4 116.3 88.44 41.38 23.43 5.2
From 2001 to 2011, the town has got average annual rainfall of 667.7mm. The annual rainfall
distribution indicates that the highest rainfall occurs between Jun to September months which
enables the town to be categorized under big rainfall places of the country.) and light rain is in
spring season (March to May)
30
Meki town, the movement of the prevailing wind of the town is controlled by pressure blow or
created from high to low areas. Such pressure is actually shifted with overhead sun in the
country. As a result the most prevailing wind of the area in general and Meki town in particular
is 45- 90 degree, about 90 degree, 90–180 degree and in some case shows 340– 360 degree. This
actually varies season to season as result of atmospheric air pressure. Thus broadly speaking the
most prevailing winds of the town supposed to easterly wind.
Therefore, the selection of new dumping site or improving the existing to the level of modern
sanitary land fill and abattoir should be recommended to be located in the northwestern periphery
of the town.
31
Figure 9: Dominating wind direction of town
2.12.4 Drainage
There is no permanent river flowing across the town. But there are seasonal streams originating
From the highest points of the town and the nearby areas. These streams generally flow from northeast to
south and from northwest to south directions. Therefore, the edges of these Streams should be conserved
or used for urban agricultural with exception to those areas which are important ground water potential
sites. Besides, those incompatible land uses along the edges of the streams like lavajo should be relocated
to other areas by considering compatibility with other land uses and ground water potential and stream
32
2.12 River
There is river crossing the town from north to south which can be seen as natural potential.
However, the river bank is encroached by resident settlements and urban agriculture activities.
These settlements activities dispose both solid and liquid waste which currently polluted the
rivers. The pollution of this river contaminates farming areas in the south affecting large number
of peasant families. The water bodies cover an area of 11.58 hectares that is 0.48% out of the
total land use.
One of the major green area proposals of the structure plan is to demarcate protective forest and
buffer. Sloppy areas, Mountain areas and environmental sensitive areas will be covered.
Covering with protective forest has the following main advantages. Under protective and buffer
no construction is allowed. Afforesting the area with selected species of trees are the only
allowed task in this sub land use category. Though, the type of vegetation differs from one area
to other, natural resource area like water resource, wetland must kept protected from
environmental degradation. Hence, the structure plan of the town tries to protect the natural
source area by putting the resources under protective forest and buffer.
33
Figure 10: Protective Buffer along Water Bodies and Forest
2.13 Soil
The soil of Meki town ranges from reddish brown to grey. It is deep soil and loose with small
clayey character. Therefore, the soil is good for the growth of different types of crops like
Barley, Wheat and crops like Bean and oil crop should be cultivated if water for irrigation is
available. To this end, areas around the edges of major streams except those areas of ground
water potential where the deep wells of the town are found, should be used for urban agriculture
The loose nature of the soil has difficulty concerning erosion. Thus, appropriate soil erosion
34
management methods should be practiced to minimize soil erosion especially during the rainy
season.
2.14 Vegetation
Natural vegetation of any area is the result of climate, soil, topography and human influence.
The different vegetation types of the town include Pod carpus, junipers, acacia, oleo, avocado,
mango and other artificial trees like eucalyptus are common because of the agro-climatic
condition of the Town. At the present time, these natural vegetation are being replaced by
secondary vegetation especially Eucalyptus tree. Eucalyptus tree has an impact on the ecology of
the town and the hinterland by aggravating the rate of soil erosion and absorbing much amount
of ground water. Thus, eucalyptus tree should not be planted especially along the edges of
streams and in areas where there is high potential of ground water potential. In few areas of the
town as in most inaccessible areas natural vegetation are common. In order to conserve these
areas and benefit from the natural vegetation it is important to propose urban zoo in the town.
The area suitable for urban zoo in Meki town is the one that is found east of the current water
reservoir. The area is selected for urban zoo because of the presence of variety of indigenous
natural vegetation in the site, to conserve the ground water potential found in the nearby area,
steeper slope for other land uses, the presence of wild life and natural vegetation conservation
office and the presence of agricultural research office in the town.
35
west direction is the second best preferable for residential and other development based on
planning principle.
36
Figure 11: Future expansion direction of Meki Town
37
Previous plan evaluation
38
Figure 12: Incompatibility of land uses from previous plan
39
CHAPTER THREE
3. Municipal services Assessment; data analysis and interpretation Municipal activities are those
activities which are administered by the municipality for the proper Functioning of different
activities in the town. This includes general market, livestock market, Abattoir, waste disposal,
and bus station and freight terminal
Source: Revised Standards for Structure Plan Preparation and Implementation, 2012
40
Figure 13: Proposed fruit and vegetable Market Town
41
subsistence production and marketing systems. The livestock market should consider trekking
routes, accessible, peripheral and compatible market places and transport facilities. The slope of
the cattle market is above 5 % and below 1 % it have impact on the commercial activities and it
is important to provide different services like water shade. The existing cattle market not fit
Cattle flow directions from the South and West, but batter to proposing road that facilitate
accessibility, compatibility for the market
42
Table 7: Livestock market standard
Source: Revised Standards for Structure Plan Preparation and Implementation, 2012
Required Standard
N.B.
• 3.5 m2per cattle, 0.90m2 per shoat and 4.5m2 per equines have been assumed to determine
area required market
• The area required for circulation is nearly 10.25 percent of the total area reserved for the
market.
Location
• Outside the central part of city or in the peripheries of city to avoid cattle intrusions;
• Far from schools, health services, worship places, and residential areas; and,
43
3.2 Bus Terminal and Freight Terminal
The transport service is needed for more competitive, safe and efficient of economic and social
development of the town. Improving Transport Choice is an important part of the town
commitment to promote urban areas as attractive and convenient places in which to live and
work. The Administration has been taking a measure to alleviate traffic congestion within inner
the traffic flow in the inner town increased rapidly due to the increase of tri-wheel (bajaj) motors
for intra urban transportation.
Meki bus terminal is located at the western part of the town and on the back of senay hotel
around 200 meter from the main road established and fenced to give inters urban transportation
service. There is one bus terminals in Meki town, which qualifies level three bus station and total
area is about (0.63 hec) and has a capacity to accommodate about 50 small and medium vehicles
per day. But the required standard for level three (1.04-1.82) therefore it is not sufficient. The
existing bus-station is not full fill the required standard and public discussion also implies to
propose another bus-station. Therefore proposing another bus station which qualifies level three
bus station is important. The total area required standard for level four bus station is about (1.04-
1.82) hec, to the direction meet the standard in terms of catchment radius. There is no any kind
of taxi terminal the town, therefore proposing tax terminal is important.
44
Figure 14: Proposed Bus station of Meki town
45
3.3.1. The components of an airport
An airport is a complex transportation facility, designed to serve aircraft, passengers, and cargo
and surface vehicles. Each of these users is served by different components of an airport. The
components of an airport are typically place into two categories. The airside of an airport is
planned and managed to accommodate the movement of aircraft around the airport as well as to
and from the air. The airside components of an airport are further categorized as being part of
local airspace or airfield. The airport‘s airfield components include all the facilities located on
the physical property of the airport to facilitate aircraft operations. The airspace surrounding an
airport is simply the area, off the ground, surrounding the airport, where aircraft maneuver after
takeoff, prior to landing, or even merely to pass through on the way to another airport (Wells and
Seth,2004). The landside components of an airport are planned and managed to accommodate
the movement of ground-based vehicles, passengers, cargo and support services such as fire and
rescue. These components are further categorized to reflect specific users being served. The
airport terminal component is primarily designed to facilitate the movement of passengers and
luggage from the landside to aircraft on the airside. The airport‘s ground access components
accommodates the movement of the ground-based vehicles to and from the surrounding
metropolitan area, as well as between the various buildings found on the airport property. No
matter what the size or category of an airport, each of the above components is necessary to
properly move people from one metropolitan area to using air transportation. The components of
an airport are planned in a manner that allows for the proper ‗flow‘ from one component to
another. An example of a typical ‗flow‘ between components is illustrated in figure 1 below, it
further identifies some of the facilities located on airfield and ground access components of the
airport.
46
selected for the airport and orientation of the runway system should facilitate a long – term
development of the airport at the lowest cost in terms of money and social impacts. Selection of a
suitable site for the airport should begin with an assessment of any existing airport and its site. It
is nearly always easier to modify an existing airport than to create a new one on land that has
previously had a different land use designation. The assessment is made in the light of the
prospective passenger market, its growth rate and any limitation of the growth resulting from, for
example, a demographic shift of population. Therefore the prognosis of the growth of a number
of passengers and volume of air cargo in the catchment area of the airport is one key element in
planning the airport development. After the proposed airport‘s size and layout has been
approximately determined by a preliminary study, possible sites for the development of the
airport are assessed in several steps, the principal ones being:
47
Table 8: Maximum building height in aviation restricted zone
48
Table 9: Car Accidents by types
2011 3 1 2 - 7000.00
2012 4 - 2 2 14800.00
2013 1 1 - - -
Total 8 2 4 2 21800.00
In the town there are 795 horse drawn carts that serve the intra urban transport throughout the
town.
49
3.5.2. Inter-urban Transport
Even though there is no well surfaced road between Meki and other surrounding towns except
the main road there is good inter-urban transport. This is because the town is hub/market for cash
crops like tomato, onion and cabbage. Therefore, Meki town has good transport interaction with
the surrounding towns. Daily flow of public transport from the surrounding towns and Meki
town is depicted in the following table:
3.6. Road
Road is one of the most important physical infrastructures that facilitates movement but the
coverage and quality of roads in the town is very low. The roads in the town are not to the
standard and it includes gravel surfaced collector and earth roads. They are not facilitate easy
movement within the town i.e. there is no clear hierarchical arrangement of roads.
50
3.7. Natural and Man-made Constraints for future Development of the Town
The natural constraints within the town are minor gullies, river/streams banks because of their
location; they are difficult for easy development of infrastructures. . In the North West part of
the town excavation for sand widened the bank of the river this is the major manmade constraint.
In addition the long meandering of the river should consider for allocation of land uses. These
areas also needs good buffer of forest of indigenous type to minimize soil erosion and flood. In
the future the town has a probability of expanding in all directions except to the south Some
areas their gradient is less than 2 % which is floodable and has a wide swampy area at the South,
southwestern and northwestern. The other things which is natural hinder factor is that Excessive
slope for urban development activities Difficult to Build, (15-20%)and Slope Harsh, steep
slopes (>20 %) part which creates constraint for development. Man-made constraint in the town
is that the electric line that cross the town concert pole which is not incorporates in the base map.
51
3.8. Public utilities of Meki town
3.5.1. Electric services
The town connected to hydroelectric power of the national grid in 1963 E.C. The town as a
whole and the surrounding rural areas get the service but here is a shortage of electric service in
the following localities: road 41, the previous Hamus gabaya and around Bekele Molla Hotel. To
solve the problem the Meki district service center of EEPCo proposes localities that need
transformers theses are old Hamus gebeya, , around the municipality, police office and road 41.
The town has about 5 km street light coverage. The service center expects more from the
municipality to improve the service of the street light like the trees planted along the Roads are
managed as they not overlap with the electric polls i.e. the electric line and the tree line should
not allied as they cause a danger on life and property. In sum the current expansion of the town
needs the electric service more so the concerned bodies needs to work together to improve the
service.
52
CHAPTER FOUR
4.1. Planning issues and Recommendations
1. The location, site and situation contribute for growth and development of settlement such as
accessibility and availability of natural resources of its surroundings. Therefore it is important to
create maximum accessibility through developing road network. The current urban growth of
Meki town is characterized by horizontal expansion ,which means that development activities
spread along sides of the highway or main road that connect the town of Batu, and Bote
2.There are r gullies and soil degradation needs to be treated to stop further widening to achieve
the banks of areas on the Structural plan should be protected by allotting buffer zone on the
banks of Seasonal a streams should be both side buffering 15m-30m accordingly. The flood
hazard due to overflow swamp has increased in recent years Since at the moment flooding is the
serious problem of the town it needs solution, therefore don‘t use swamp areas for urban land
use like residence, services commerce and the like rather than green and urban agriculture. One
of the solutions for flooding is designing an appropriate drainage lines and based on design
constructing appropriate drainage lines is very important. The flood hazard due to overflow
swamp has increased in recent years Since at the moment flooding is the serious problem of the
town it needs solution, therefore don‘t use swamp areas for urban land use like residence,
services commerce and the like rather than green and urban agriculture.
3. The dominant wind direction (40%) of Meki town and its surrounding is easterly (Easterly,
North easterly and southeasterly). Because of this, it is important to have the new pollutant
industrial of the town to the direction of Northwestern periphery of the town.
The existing cattle market not compatible and accessible location. The major Cattle flow
directions is from the southern and south west. The slope of the cattle market is above 5 % and
below 1 % it have impact on the commercial activities because of water stagnant and it is
important to provide different services like water and shade. The existing cattle market not fit
Cattle flow directions from the South and West, But proposing road that facilitate accessibility,
compatibility below the standard.
4. The existing bus-station is not full fill the required standard and public discussion also implies
to propose another bus-station. Therefore proposing another bus station which qualifies level
53
four bus station is important. The total area required standard for level four bus station is about
(2.67 -3.13) hec, to the direction of Bote out let. There is no any kind of taxi terminal in the
town; therefore problem should be answered by LDP.
5. These infrastructures include roads, utilities like electric, telephone and water lines. It is
appropriate to exercise strict control to prevent sprawl into the expansion areas and the joining
up of existing settlements. Besides, it is important to respect landscape capacity by avoiding
inappropriate road construction on steeper slopes, farming on high slope and settlement
expansion. The area that slope category less than 2% and above 20% are difficult for settlement
and other permanent urban land use, it should be take considerations.
7. The shape of Meki town is linear development (elongated), therefore to minimize the impact of
distance, time and cost for travel from one point to the other point and fair distribution of
infrastructure. Meki town structure plan should adopt decentralization of pulled activities
through establishment of Neighborhood center to distribute the economic activities,
administrative services, and housing among new residential areas
54
References
1. California Forest Practice Rules, California Code of Regulations, title 14, 2013.
2. Town of Oxnard 2030 General Plan, October 11, 2011 Town Counsel
3. Town report in Surging Town Center Job Growth, February 2005.
4. Jenks, Mike. 2000. The acceptability of urban intensification, Katie Williams, Elizabeth
Burton, and Mike Jenks. London: E & FN Spon.
5. Town observatory.org, Accessed date Oct 2019, Town Observatory, Surging Town Center Job
Growth.
6. Hydro ecological approach for determining the width of riparian buffer zones for providing
Soil conservation and water quality, T. Dindarog˘lu • M. Reis • A. E. Akay F. Tonguc, Accessed
on December 18, 2018
7. Revised Standards for Structure Plan Preparation and Implementation, 2012
8. bendat, j.s. and a.g.piersol, 1986. ―Decomposition of wave forces into linear and on linear
components,‖ journal of sound and vibration, 106: 391-408. Board of soil and water resources,
2008.
9. wca rule advisory committee meeting notes 4/24/08. Actions eligible for credits - buffers.
bried, j.t. and g.n. ervin, 2006. ―Abundance patterns of dragonflies along a wetland buffer,‖
wetlands, 26 (3): 878–883.
10. Brooks, k.n., p.f. folliott, h.m.gregersen, and l.f. debano, 2003. Hydrology and the agement
of watersheds, 3rd edition.c.h.i.p.s., ames, ia: blackwell, 307-368. burke, v.j. and j.w. gibbons,
1995. ―Terrestrial buffer zones and wetland conservation: a case study of freshwater turtles in a
carolina bay,‖ conservation biology, 9 (6): 1365-1369.
11. chatfield, c., 2004. the analysis of time series: an introduction, 6th edition. london: Chapman
& hall/crc. crooks, k.r. and m.e.soulé, 1999. ―mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a
ragmented system,‖ nature, 400: 563–566. davis, j.c., 1986. 12. Statistics and data analysis
ingeology, 2nd edition. new york: john wiley& sons. 13. de steven, d. and m.m. toner, 2004.
12. Vegetation of upper coastal plain depression wetlands: environmental templates and
tlandynamics within a landscape framework,‖ wetlands, 24: 23-42. dorff, c.j., 1995. ―Geographic
distribution.Hemidactylium stratum (four-toed salamander),‖ rpetological review, 26:
150.dosskey, m., 2008. ―a design aid for determining width of filter strips,‖ journal of soil and
water conservation, 63: 232-241.
55
14. Emmons and Olivier Resources, Inc. (EOR), 2001. Benefits of wetland buffers: A study of
functions, values, and size. Prepared for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. EOR, Inc.
Oakdale, MN.
15. Foster, L., N. Shah, M. Ross, G.S. Ladde, and P. Wang, 2007. ―Using frequency analysis to
determine wetland hydro period,‖ Neural, Parallel and Scientific Computations, 16: 17-34.
Fraley, C. and A.E. Raftery, 2002.―Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density
estimation,‖ Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97: 611-631.
56