GD Topics-Helpful Content (1)
GD Topics-Helpful Content (1)
GD Topics-Helpful Content (1)
War, throughout history, has been a grim testament to human conflict and
suffering. While it may be marked with military victories and defeats, the
overarching theme remains clear: "No one wins in a war." While we all thought
we were into a new era of peace and technological progress, the recent Russia-
Ukraine War of 2022 and 2023 Hamas attack on Israel have shaken the popular
perception. This group discussion (GD) topic is not only relevant but also
profound as it delves into the deep-rooted consequences and ethical dimensions
of armed conflicts. In this discussion, we will explore various aspects of this
statement, dissecting its political, social, and humanitarian dimensions.
1. Historical Perspectives
Historical records show that wars have, indeed, reshaped maps, redrawn
borders, and decided the fate of nations. Military triumphs may have
temporarily satisfied the victors' ambitions, but the aftermath has often brought
unintended and severe repercussions. Wars lead to the destruction of
infrastructure, the displacement of civilians, and, tragically, the loss of countless
lives. The scars of war persist for generations, often turning victory into a hollow
achievement.
Historical Examples
2. Economic Impact
Wars come at a staggering economic cost. Funds that could have been invested
in education, healthcare, and economic development are redirected to military
endeavors. This results in a weakened economy, debt burdens, and a decrease
in the overall quality of life for the citizens. The resources and wealth that could
have been used for the greater good are squandered on destruction.
4. Environmental Impact
War ravages not only human lives but also the environment. Deforestation,
pollution, and the use of chemical weapons result in long-term ecological
damage. The planet, which knows no borders, suffers as a consequence of war.
This illustrates that no one truly wins when the environment is harmed in the
pursuit of power or territory. The Gulf War is also a vivid illustration of the
environmental damage that war can inflict. The intentional destruction of
Kuwaiti oil fields by retreating Iraqi forces resulted in a severe environmental
catastrophe, with long-term consequences for the region's ecosystem.
5. Political Fallout
Even the political winners of a war often find themselves grappling with
unforeseen challenges. Maintaining control over newly acquired territories can
be a costly and contentious endeavor. Furthermore, international reputation and
alliances can be damaged. Peace treaties may be fragile, and the risk of future
conflicts always looms.
The 2003 invasion of Iraq by the United States and its allies serves as a modern
example of political repercussions. While the invasion itself resulted in the
toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime, the subsequent instability in the region
and sectarian violence demonstrated that no one truly won in the political
sense. The power vacuum created led to an enduring conflict and terrorism.
7. Alternatives to War
In discussing this topic, it is important to acknowledge the alternatives to war.
Diplomacy, dialogue, and conflict resolution through international institutions
like the United Nations can offer a way out of disputes without resorting to
violence. History is replete with instances where peaceful negotiations have
resolved seemingly intractable conflicts. These peaceful resolutions lead to
enduring solutions, unlike the temporary outcomes of war.
The Iran Nuclear Deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
(JCPOA), offers a positive example of diplomacy as an alternative to war. By
engaging in negotiations, countries managed to curb Iran's nuclear program
without resorting to military conflict.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the assertion that "No one wins in a war" is a powerful reminder of
the futility and devastation inherent in armed conflicts. The discussion on this
topic should provoke reflection on the grave consequences of war on
individuals, societies, economies, and the environment. It highlights the ethical
imperative of seeking peaceful resolutions and emphasizes the importance of
diplomacy and international cooperation in resolving disputes. War, in most
cases, leaves behind a legacy of pain and destruction that overshadows any
temporary victories. Therefore, it is in the collective interest of humanity to
ensure that peaceful alternatives are prioritized over the path of war.
Surge in tourism
& residents will
lead to increased
Surge in tourism - Ayodhya’s
Surge in tourism & residents demand for both
enhanced status as a religious
will lead to a substantial domestic &
Future and cultural tourist destination
demand for FMCG, consumer international
impact will lead to increased footfall
staples and quick service, connectivity and
from pilgrims and tourists, both
restaurants (QSR) stands to benefit
domestic & international
aviation, railways
& ancillary
service providers
Ram Mandir in Ayodhya: India’s Response to Vatican City & Mecca
The construction of the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya signifies India's response to
religious centers like the Vatican City and Mecca. Ayodhya, with its deep-rooted
religious, cultural, and historical significance, is poised to become a prominent
pilgrimage destination. This development places Ayodhya in league with globally
renowned pilgrimage sites like Vatican City and Mecca, making it a central hub
for spiritual tourism with significant economic implications.
In conclusion, the inauguration of the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya on January 22,
2024, stands as a monumental event in contemporary Indian history, with far-
reaching implications for the nation's tourism potential and economic growth.
The anticipated influx of over 50 million tourists annually is set to transform
Ayodhya into a significant religious and cultural tourist destination, marking a
paradigm shift from its earlier status as a small town. The extensive makeover,
including the construction of a new airport, revamped railway station, township,
and enhanced road connectivity, is poised to act as a multiplier effect, fostering
economic activities and opportunities in various sectors such as hospitality,
FMCG, QSR, aviation, railways, and ancillary services. Ayodhya's journey from a
historical town to a religious tourist hub not only signifies a boost in tourism but
also sets a promising template for infrastructural-driven growth, presenting a
compelling narrative for future development and prosperity.
Table of Contents
1. What is FAME India Scheme?
2. Objectives of the Fame India Scheme
3. Features of the Fame India Scheme
o FAME India 1
o FAME India 2
4. Benefits of the Fame India Scheme
5. FAME India Scheme: Issues & Challenges
6. FAME India Scheme: Facts and Figures for IIM Interview & GD
7. FAME-III: Rs.26,400 Cr Investments Expected
8. Conclusion
What Is the Fame India Scheme?
An incentive program called the Fame India Scheme aims to encourage the use
of hybrid and electric cars. "Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric
and Hybrid Vehicles in India" is its full name. As a component of the Ministry
of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises' National Electric Mobility Mission
Plan, this programme offers subsidies to electric vehicle manufacturers and
infrastructure providers.
The Fame India Scheme operates in two phases
Phase I: Launched in 2015, it was in effect until March 31, 2019.
Phase II: Initiated in April 2019, originally scheduled to continue until March 31,
2022, but has been extended to March 31, 2024.
Phase III: Under discussion.
Objectives of the Fame India Scheme
The primary goals of the Fame India Scheme include:
1. Encouraging the production of a higher number of electric vehicles by
manufacturers and related providers.
2. Reduction of vehicular emissions and air pollution levels in the country.
3. Establishment of an electric charging infrastructure.
4. Targeting the conversion of 30% of total transportation to electric vehicles by
the year 2030.
Features of the Fame India Scheme:
Phase I:
Emphasis on four key areas: Demand Creation, Technology Platform, Pilot
Project, and Charging Infrastructure.
Installation of 427 charging stations.
Allocation of ₹895 crores for Phase I operations, supporting nearly 2.8 lakh
electric vehicles.
Phase II:
Focus on electrification of public and shared transportation.
Budgetary support of ₹10,000 crores.
Incentives for various vehicle categories, including electric two-wheelers,
electric four-wheelers, hybrid four-wheelers, e-rickshaws, and e-buses.
Plans to establish 2700 charging stations in metros, smart cities, and hilly
states, with coverage on highways.
Phase III:
This phase in under discussion.
Benefits of the Fame India Scheme:
The plan has a number of benefits:
A notable decrease in problems related to the environment and fuel
conservation.
Benefits from subsidies for cars in various market segments.
Citizens' access to environmentally friendly public transport.
The charging systems' utilisation of renewable energy sources.
Promotion of the use of electric vehicles through the installation of charging
stations.
Eligibility for Fame India Scheme:
The benefits of the Fame India scheme are available for:
1. Electric vehicle manufacturers.
2. Electric vehicle infrastructure providers.
FAME India Scheme II
The Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Hybrid and Electric Vehicles (FAME II)
is a significant initiative by the Government of India aimed at fostering the
development of Electric Vehicles (EVs). This initiative aligns with global efforts to
combat climate change.
Financial Outlay Phase 1: Rs. 895 Crore Phase 2: Rs. 10,000 Crore
According to people in the know, this amount would be split between electric
buses at Rs. 9,600 crore, electric three-wheelers at Rs. 4,100 crore, and electric
two-wheelers at roughly Rs. 8,158 crore. Assuming certain additional elements
such as the establishment of an innovation fund and funding for testing,
estimates indicate that the overall allocation may exceed Rs. 33,000
crore. Further discussions on the basic contours of the scheme are currently
ongoing. The focus of the proposed scheme will clearly be on enhancing electric-
based and environment-friendly public transportation in the country.
After FAME-I and FAME-II, the finance ministry had reportedly questioned the
need for extending the subsidy scheme any further. However, the ministry of
heavy industries has been pushing for it, arguing the need for electric and
alternate fuel vehicles. The third phase proposed allocation is much higher than
FAME-Iand FAME-II at Rs.895 crore and Rs.10,000 crore, respectively.
Conclusion
In conclusion we can say that vehicle emissions have caused a noticeable
increase in pollution in recent years. In order to promote the use of electric or
hybrid vehicles in India and lessen the negative environmental effects of diesel
and gasoline-powered vehicles, the Central Government launched the Fame
India Scheme in 2015. After the success of FLAME 1 and 2, now Govt is planning
Phase 3.
The global emphasis on the growth of electric vehicles is a significant priority for
governments worldwide.
5. FINTECH, a Facilitator or an
Unwanted Middlemen
Financial technology, commonly known as FinTech, has emerged as a dynamic
industry in India, with companies leveraging technology to provide a range of
financial services, including insurance, asset management, and payments. The
growth of FinTech in India has been propelled by robust government reforms,
driving the country towards a digital economy. Factors such as increased
internet and smartphone penetration have further accelerated the adoption of
digital technologies in various sectors. However, some experts call FINTECH as
an Unwanted Middlemen.
India is among the most significant operating countries for hosting a thriving
cluster or fintech headquarters, a WEF study said on January 18, 2024.
Releasing the report during its Annual Meeting 2024 in Davos, the World
Economic Forum said fintechs are increasingly expanding operations across
borders, mainly in the same region as their headquarters. "The study reveals
that vibrant hubs such as Singapore, the UK, the US, and India have hosted a
thriving cluster of fintech corporate headquarters. "Among the countries
surveyed, the most significant operating countries for fintechs include the US,
the UK, Singapore, Mexico, and India," it added.
FinTech Start Ups Drive Ecosystem
The Rise of FinTech in India has been marked by a surge in startup numbers,
growing from 733 in 2016–17 to over 14,000 in 2021–22. Of these, around 6,600
operate in the FinTech space, collectively valued at $31 billion in 2021. This
remarkable growth can be attributed to a large talent pool, favorable
regulations, and increased venture capital investments over the past decade.
FinTech startups in India have attracted substantial funding, with over $8 billion
invested across approximately 1,000 deals between 2015 and mid-2020. In
2021 alone, an additional $8 billion was invested, signaling an exponential rise.
Key players in this surge include Pine Labs, BharatPe, Razorpay, and Of
Business.
The draft allows flexibility for the sector to decide on having one or multiple
SROs for fintechs, subtly leaning towards the latter due to the diverse nature of
fintechs. However, this decision requires industry consensus, considering the
balance between addressing concerns and maintaining representative self-
regulation. The guidelines provide leeway for different SRO-FTs to achieve goals
in their unique ways. Structurally, the SRO is recommended to be a not-for-profit
company under Section 8 of the Companies Act, 2013, representing the fintech
sector with diverse membership. The RBI retains veto powers on fit-and-proper
status, board of directors, and key managerial persons. It can nominate
observers on the board and inspect or audit the SRO-FT, with associated costs
borne by the entity under scrutiny. The fast-growing fintech industry, a catalyst
for financial inclusion, faces the challenge of incentivizing SRO membership. The
sector's adoption of optimal governance and operational practices is paramount.
The drafted guidelines provide a balanced approach, offering broad guidelines
for fulfilling tasks without imposing rigid processes.
Conclusion
In conclusion, while the debate over whether FinTech acts as a facilitator or an
unwanted middleman persists, its transformative impact on India's financial
landscape cannot be denied. FinTech, as a facilitator, has propelled financial
inclusion, fostered innovation, and democratized access to financial services.
The surge in FinTech startups, coupled with substantial investments and
regulatory support, underscores its pivotal role in shaping the nation's digital
economy. The recent RBI draft guidelines further emphasize the need for
responsible self-regulation within the industry, striking a balance between
innovation and consumer protection. As India continues its journey towards a
digital economy, the role of FinTech as a facilitator is poised to remain a driving
force in fostering financial accessibility and innovation.
However, not everyone shared the tech billionaire's viewpoint and questioned Is
it possible to work 70 hours a week? Film producer Ronnie Screwvala contended
that boosting productivity doesn't solely depend on extended working hours. He
argued that it's about enhancing one's skills, fostering a positive work
environment, and receiving fair compensation for the work accomplished.
Quality of work, he stressed, should take precedence over the number of hours
clocked in.
As the professional world becomes increasingly competitive, the 70-hour
workweek is gaining prevalence. Many driven individuals willingly commit to this
demanding schedule in pursuit of their career goals. However, this rigorous work
ethic comes with both advantages and disadvantages, which are essential to
consider.
Consulting firms and recruiters emphasized that companies, especially in the IT,
hospitality and banking industry are trying to upskill their workforce, but warned
that the advent of AI will lead to retrenchments in the coming months, while
employees play catch-up with this sophisticated technology.
The group of people with this fear includes Elon Musk, co-founder of Tesla and
SpaceX, and owner of X, formerly Twitter; Masayoshi Son, CEO of SoftBank, and
AI experts such as Geoffery Hinton and Yoshua Bengio. The other cohort, which
includes AI experts such as Yann LeCun, Fei-Fei Li, Andrew Ng, believe that AI is
nowhere close to becoming “sentient”.
Despite their differences, all of them agree that AI and GenAI need to be
regulated and controlled, and governments around the world are doing so. On 8
December, for instance, the European Union (EU) presented a comprehensive
risk-based draft AI Act and is likely to publish the final text in early 2024. The
Act seeks to ban biometric categorization systems that use certain sensitive
characteristics, and untargeted scraping of facial images from the internet or
CCTV footage to create facial recognition, among other things.
Earlier, the Group of Seven (G7), comprising Canada, France, Germany, Italy,
Japan, the UK and the US, introduced guiding principles and a code of conduct
for AI, even as all these countries have draft regulations in place. India is
already a founding member of the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence
(GPAI), an international forum that “aims to bridge the gap between theory and
practice on AI by supporting cutting-edge research and applied activities on AI-
related priorities”.
India, which has a Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, is soon expected to
introduce the Digital India Act (DIA)—the new law is expected to regulate AI and
intermediaries, even as the Indian government seeks to strike a fine balance
between acknowledging the good in AI and penalizing its misuse.
The move makes sense since India is home to more than 400 languages, making
it one of the most linguistically diverse countries in the world, and yet, most
foundation models and LLMs are trained primarily using internet data, which is
predominantly English.
AI Pros:
Efficiency: AI can process large amounts of data quickly and accurately, allowing
it to complete tasks much faster than humans.
Accuracy: AI can be programmed to make decisions based on objective data and
logic, reducing the risk of human error.
Personalization: AI can be used to personalize experiences and services based
on individual preferences and behaviors.
Safety: AI can be used to monitor and control potentially dangerous situations,
such as in manufacturing or transportation.
Innovation: AI can enable the development of new technologies and solutions
that were previously impossible.
AI Cons:
Job displacement: AI can potentially automate many tasks that are currently
performed by humans, leading to job loss and economic disruption.
Bias: AI systems can be biased if they are trained on data that is not
representative of the population as a whole..
Privacy concerns: AI systems may collect and store large amounts of personal
data, raising concerns about privacy and security.
Dependence: Overreliance on AI systems could lead to a lack of human
expertise and decision-making skills.
Unpredictability: AI systems can be unpredictable, and their decision-making
processes may not always be transparent or understandable.
It's important to carefully consider both the potential benefits and drawbacks of
AI when developing and implementing AI systems. This will help ensure that AI is
used in a responsible and beneficial way.
Since the idea of one nation-one Poll is to synchronize the Lok Sabha elections
conducted pan-India and the State Legislative Assembly elections so that they
take place together once in every five years, it would save the nation from being
drained of money, resources and manpower due to frequent elections.
One Nation one Poll’ is not a new idea in India. The first 4-5 elections held in
India after Independence followed this notion and were successfully conducted
across the country. Now to avoid the multiplicity of election dates and expenses
for Parliament and Assembly elections which are conducted separately,
presently the NDA government is thinking to go for practice of “one nation one
election”.
Back Ground: Need for One Nation One Election
The idea of “One Nation One Election” is not new for India. India had the system
of One Nation One Election and implemented it during the general elections held
in 1952, 1957, 1962 and 1967. This practice was discontinued in 1968-69, on
the grounds that some Legislative Assemblies were broken up due to different
reasons. From that point India has been making a decent attempt to embrace
the old election system but there is no consensus among the political parties.
During the past few years, it has been observed that every now and then
elections are happening in one or other state of India. The State Administration
and Election Commission of India have to connect with its assets, labor to
conduct the election. India is known as the largest democratic country of the
world and the general elections of Lok Sabha and state assemblies are supposed
to be conducted after every five years, unless there are mid-term polls due to
dissolution of Lok Sabha or State Assembly for any reason.
Idea of ‘One Nation, One Poll’: Buzz is High
Since 2014
Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) led by the Prime Minister Narendra Damodar das Modi
came to power in India in 2024 sweeping Lok Sabha Polls across the country and
the feat was repeated in 2019 as well. The Prime Minister Modi and his party BJP
have been ardent advocate of the idea ‘One Nation, One Poll’ since coming to
power in 2014. Modi’s idea is to conduct simultaneous polls not only for Lok
Sabha and all the State Legislative Assemblies (Vidhan Sabha) but also for local
bodies like Nagar Nigam, Panchayat, Zila Parishad among others. In view of
Prime Minister Modi it will substantially reduce the financial burden on
exchequer as there is almost a continuous election cycle going on in the country
in one or other state which also is an obstacle to the development work during
the polling period.
Government Forms Committee on ‘One Nation,
One Election’
On Friday, September 1, 2023, Government of India has set up a Committee
headed by former President of India, Shri Ram Nath Kovind to explore the
possibility of 'one nation, one poll'. If India goes for simultaneous elections for its
assemblies and the Lok Sabha, it will be part of a group of countries that hold
concurrent polls.
Confirming the formation of Committee on ‘One Nation, One Election’, Union
Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi said “Right now, a committee has
been constituted. A report of the committee will come out which will be
discussed. The Parliament is mature, and discussions will take place, there is no
need to get nervous...India is called the mother of democracy, there is
evolution…I will discuss the agenda of the Special session of Parliament"
Parliament to Hold Special 5 Day Session
Government of India has called a special 5 day session from September 18 to
22, 2023. However, it is not clear whether the Agenda include the tabling of
‘One Nation, One Poll’, bill in parliament or it will discuss other emergent issues
which could not be discussed and passed in the Monsoon session 2023 due to
the disruptions and waste of three days which saw discussions from minority
opposition benches and responses from treasury benches on No Confidence
Motion against the Prime Minister of India, Shri Modi.
But there are speculations that the government is planning to introduce "One
Nation, One Election" bill in Parliament. Besides, the speculations about early
Lok Sabha election are also rife as the announcement of committee formation
came only a day after Centre called a special session of Parliament.
One Nation, One Poll Bill in Parliament
In 2015, the government asked the election commission whether one nation one
election was possible, to which the EC responded “Yes it is and we can do it if
the constitution is amended’ and amendments are made in Representation of
the People Act, 1951." If the committee finds it feasible to go for One Nation,
One Election’ concept and Government introduces a bill to this effect in
Parliament, following amendments in Constitution are required according to
Experts:
Constitutional Amendments by Parliament
Former Chief Election Commissioner OP Rawat said that it was possible and all
that is needed is an amendment in the Constitution, “"Framers of the
Constitution had kept the provision of One Nation One Election in the law and in
the Constitution. In 1952, 1957, 1962, and 1967, both state assembly and
nation happened together. Since 1967, it started going out of sync and started
the phenomenon round the year election. The election commission had in the
year 1982-83 put forward a suggestion to bring an amendment (to the relevant
law) so that one nation one election can again be held simultaneously.”
As such, the Government has to introduce the One Nation, One Poll Bill in
Parliament with amendments in following Articles of Constitution:
Article 83: It states that the term of the LokSabha will be five years from the
date of its first sitting.
Article 85: It empowers the President to dissolve the LokSabha.
Article 172: It states that the term of the legislative assembly will be five years
from the date of its first sitting.
Article 174: It empowers the Governor of the state to dissolve the Legislative
Assembly.
Article 356: It authorizes the Central Government to impose President’s Rule
for failure of constitutional machinery in the State.
Besides, The Representation of the People Act as well as related parliamentary
procedure will also need to be amended. To Synchronise the term of the State
Legislative Assemblies with that of the Lok Sabha, the term of the state
legislative assemblies can be reduced and increased accordingly.
One Nation, One Poll - Pros and Cons
If India is able to counter the challenges and implements the idea of One Nation,
one poll, more benefits will be there. Let’s discuss below the One Nation, One
Poll – Pros and Cons
Positives: One Nation One Poll: Benefits are
More
Key advantages of implementing ‘One Nation, One Poll, are:
Saving the Public Money
The greatest rationale in the support of the simultaneous election is the saving
of government money. If the country goes for “One Nation One Election” it will
save huge amount of money. There are 4120 MLAs in the 31 states and UTs and
the use limit for assembly election is Rs.28 lacks. It implies that absolute
expense would be somewhere around Rs.11 billon. Normally around 5 states go
for elections each year.
Opposition parties have spoken against the ‘one nation, one election’ saying
that BJP is afraid of new opposition alliance named ‘I.N.D.I.A. which is why the
Government is making this move. Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut said, “The
country is already one, is anyone questioning that? We demand fair election, not
'one nation one election'. This funda of 'one nation one election' is being brought
to divert the attention from our demand of fair election."
Congress leader Bhai Jagtap contended, “There is an imperative need for a lot of
discussion on this (one nation, one election). However, this proves that BJP is
afraid of I.N.D.I.A. which is why they made this move."
New Government Serious on the Issue
If there is any government in the recent years that can successfully implement
the idea of one nation-one election by amending the constitution in the largest
democracy of the world, it is the present BJP government which retained power
with a tally of over 300 seats in the Loksabha polls 2019.
Since coming to power in 2014, Prime Minister Modi has been a strong votary for
the idea of simultaneous polls, which include those at local bodies, citing
financial burden caused by almost continuous election cycle and jolt to
development work during the polling period. Former President Shri Ram Nath
Kovind too had echoed Modi's view and expressed his support to the idea after
becoming President in 2017.
The vision of the party in power - Bhartiya Janta Party (BJP) under the leadership
of the country’s Prime-Minister Mr. Narendra Modi is also to set the platform for
a development mindset as this system is supposed to set free politicians,
government officials and the state resources from the hassle of organizing
elections in different parts of the country every year now and then and
completely direct the government machinery on solid groundwork rather than
needless formalities.
Solution: How India can Achieve Big with ‘One
Nation, One Poll’
The challenges and obstacles can be over come to implement the ambitious
‘One Nation, one Election’ Plan. As of now only three countries in the world
Belgium, Sweden and South Africa conduct simultaneous elections. So, there are
no significant examples of countries with a similar federal parliamentary system
conducting simultaneous elections like the one proposed by the one nation-one
election agenda. The Bharatiya Janata Party has never been averse to change
and now making all out efforts to make this plan a reality. It is something the
world has never seen and it does pose a few problems as well but if
implemented to perfection we might actually see a new resurgent India.
The solutions to various obstacles in implementing ‘One Nation, One Poll’ can be
overcome by adopting following solutions
One solution is inviting the second or the third leading person in the house or
the leader of a political party to form the government or the House being given
the opportunity to elect its leader, in case the government falls before
completing its term.
Other solution is to amend the constitution to a certain extent and provide that
any assembly whose term is ending within the six months to the Lok Sabha
elections, after or before, the election for it can happen with that of the Lok
Sabha.
Another solution is to switch to the Presidential form of Government where the
President is not accountable to the House. In America, the Election Day is fixed.
After every four years, the Tuesday that falls after the first Monday in the month
of November is the Election Day for the seat of the President and the Vice
President. Similarly, the dates for holding the elections for the House of
Representative and the Senate, are also fixed. The dates are between 2nd and
8th of the month of November. By law, these dates have been fixed.
There is no doubt that implementation of the ‘One Nation One Election’ will
involve some logistical costs. But there will be huge saving on reduced election
expenditure and would result in net savings. if India opts for ‘one nation, one
election’, the world’s biggest democracy will set another unique example.
The statement "First Impression is the last impression" suggests that the initial
impression someone has of you will be the lasting impression they have of you,
and that it will not change over time.
While it is true that first impressions are important, it is not necessarily true that
they are the "last impression." People are complex and multidimensional, and
their opinions and perceptions can change over time as they get to know
someone better. It's also important to recognize that first impressions are not
always accurate. People may form opinions based on limited information or
biases, which can lead to misunderstandings and misjudgments.
Why are First Impressions Important?
So why should we care about making a positive first impression? An example
will make it clear. Raj is a talented and qualified person. Yet he failed to get job
even after appearing for many interviews. He discussed his problem with his
uncle, Kumar, who made him understand that his problem was perhaps not
about skills or knowledge, but his failure to make a good initial impression.
If the first impression is not good, it can be a big stumbling block. A positive first
impression, on the other hand, can help forge long-term associations.
When you meet people professionally, you are usually judged on the basis of
how you behave, what you wear, how you communicate, your body language,
and self-projection. So, first impressions are really important.
Walk in confidently with your head held high. Be polite yet clearly audible.
Maintain a positive outlook and smile. High-ranking executives, coaches,
celebrities, and political leaders often practice for public appearances. Earlier,
people rehearsed in front of mirrors. Today, you have video cameras.
3. Navigate Conversation to Your Strengths
The first impression is the last impression and you should do everything that you
can to ensure that your first impression is the best impression. Hence, try and
keep the discussion that are focussed around your strengths and achievements.
You can talk about your personal, academic and non-academic achievements.
Be humble but do talk about yourself and your achievements positively.
4. Be a Good Listener
Listening is a very important but less understand area to create a good positive
impression. Pay attention when others speak. Make eye contact, nod and don't
interrupt or finish others' sentences. However, don’t be shy to offer your
comments after the other person has spoken. Generally, people love to talk
about themselves, so you may find that you can create a good impression by
simply asking insightful questions about others.
5. Dress Appropriately
This is a simple but important tip to create a positive impression. What you wear
to interviews and social gatherings can be as important as what you speak and
how you behave. For interviews and meetings, wear formal clothes that are
clean and smart looking. The colors you wear should not be too strong or
dominating. You should also avoid wearing anything very flashy, or too casual.
While business suits are usually a safe bet. You can also choose your clothes
and accessories according to the climate and culture of the location. In short,
you should dress up as someone confident, comfortable, and smart.
In conclusion, we can say that First impressions are Important. In fact, they have
so much impact that people say that the first impression is the last impression.
11. GD Topic: Is It Still Too Early For India To Have Bullet Trains?
One such area is the presence of bullet trains in India, and whether it is too early to introduce
them. Like almost any other GD topic, this too can be answered in either For or Against motion. Let
us explore each option:
For the Motion
The Bullet Train may eventually be a grand success but there are several points against it as well in
present-day India explained through the following bullet points:
1. Within railways, lot more pressing concerns remain, such as safety of existing tracks, reducing
accidents, cleanliness of stations and wagons, modern infrastructure, better security for women,
hygienic food and the need for a more efficient online ticketing portal.
2. The circuit chosen i.e. Mumbai to Ahmedabad is already one of the best- connected ones.
There was little need for more, but instead tracks could have been built in more remote or
backward areas.
3. The costs to the overall economy also do not justify. While the interest rates are low, this
amount needs to be repaid in US Dollars fifteen years hence. If one counts the inflation level
and the periodic weakening of the India rupee versus the US Dollar, the costs will spiral up
immensely.
4. The costs to the individuals will also be high, making it unviable. A lot of passengers may
instead choose simply to fly. The authorities would have been better advised to improve the air
line services though schemes such as UDAN (Udey desh ka Aam Nagarik).
5. Before launching more such fancy express trains, the government needs to curate programmes
to train the people of the country against unruly behaviours. The Tejas Express between
Mumbai and Goa for instance received a lot of bad publicity due to passengers’ vandalizing
behaviour on the train. Such behaviour must be strictly punished by the Railway Police and
other such authorities, to set a strong example.
6. Beyond inter-city trains, there is a massive requirement for intra- city transport. The local train
networks are in despair in many of the older, industrial cities such as in Mumbai. There is a
need for modernizing these systems and expanding on the metro and mono rail networks.