Appendix A Example 2 1

LRFD Substructure Example 1 Full Height Abutment on Spread Footing
1
SUBSTRUCTURE
EXAMPLE

Full Height
Abutment on Spread
Footing

This example illustrates the design of a full height abutment on spread footings
for a single span cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete box girder bridge. The
bridge has a 160 feet span with a 15 degree skew. Standard ADOT 32-inch
f-shape barriers will be used resulting in a typical deck section consisting of
1-5 barrier, 12-0 outside shoulder, two 12-0 lanes, a 6-0 inside shoulder
and 1-5 barrier. The overall out-to-out width of the bridge is 44-10. A
plan view and typical section of the bridge are shown in Figures 1 and 2.

The following legend is used for the references shown in the left-hand column:
[2.2.2] LRFD Specification Article Number
[2.2.2-1] LRFD Specification Table or Equation Number
[C2.2.2] LRFD Specification Commentary
[A2.2.2] LRFD Specification Appendix
[BDG] ADOT Bridge Design Guideline

Superstructure
Design Example 1 demonstrates design of the superstructure and bearings for a
single span cast-in-place post-tensioned concrete box girder bridge using
LRFD. Critical dimensions and loads are repeated here for ease of reference.

Bridge Geometry
Bridge span length 160.00 ft
Bridge width 44.83 ft
Roadway width 42.00 ft

Loads
DC Superstructure 1229.30 kips
DW Superstructure 85.63 kips

Substructure
This example demonstrates basic design features for design of a full height
abutment supported on a spread footing. The substructure has been analyzed
in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4
th

Edition, 2007 and the 2008 Interim Revisions.

Geotechnical
The soil profile used in this example is the one used for the Geotechnical
Policy Memo Number 1: Development of Factored Bearing Resistance Chart
by a Geotechnical Engineer for Use by a Bridge Engineer to Size Spread
Footings on Soils based on Service and Strength Limit States.

2

Figure 1

Figure 2
3
Material Properties

[5.4.3.2]

[3.5.1-1]
[C3.5.1]

[C5.4.2.4]

[5.7.1]

[5.7.2.2]

Modulus of
Rupture
[5.4.2.6]

Reinforcing Steel
Yield Strength f
y
= 60 ksi
Modulus of Elasticity E
s
= 29,000 ksi

Concrete
f
c
= 3.5 ksi

Unit weight for normal weight concrete is listed below. The unit weight for
reinforced concrete is increased 0.005 kcf greater than that for plain concrete.

Unit weight for computing E
c
= 0.145 kcf
Unit weight for DL calculation = 0.150 kcf

The modulus of elasticity for normal weight concrete where the unit weight is
0.145 kcf may be taken as shown below:

ksi f E
c c
3405 5 . 3 1820 ' 1820 = = =

The modular ratio of reinforcing to concrete should be rounded to the nearest
whole number.

52 . 8
3405
29000
= = n Use n = 9

1
= the ratio of the depth of the equivalent uniformly stressed compression
zone assumed in the strength limit state to the depth of the actual compression
zone stress block. For concrete strengths not exceeding 4.0 ksi,
1
= 0.85.

The modulus of rupture for normal weight concrete has several values. When
used to calculate service level cracking, as specified in Article 5.7.3.4 for side
reinforcing or in Article 5.7.3.6.2 for determination of deflections, the
following equation should be used:

ksi f f
c r
449 . 0 5 . 3 24 . 0 ' 24 . 0 = = =

When the modulus of rupture is used to calculate the cracking moment of a
member for determination of the minimum reinforcing requirement as
specified in Article 5.7.3.3.2, the following equation should be used:

ksi f f
c r
692 . 0 5 . 3 37 . 0 ' 37 . 0 = = =

4

Existing Soil
The existing soil has the following properties:

Depth
ft
Soil Type Total unit weight,
s

pcf

degrees
0-25 Fine to coarse sands 120 30
25-75 Gravelly sands 125 36
75-90 Fine to coarse sands 120 30
90-130 Gravels 125 38

The following assumptions have been made. No groundwater is present. The
soils will not experience any long-term (consolidation or creep) settlement.

The Factored Net Bearing Resistance Chart plots the factored net bearing
resistance versus effective footing width for a range of immediate settlements
as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3

Backfill Soil
The soil used for backfill has the following properties:

s
= 0.120 kcf
k
a
= 0.292

5
Limit States
[1.3.2]
[1.3.2.1-1]

[1.3.2.1-2]

[1.3.2.1-3]

[1.3.3]

[1.3.4]

[1.3.5]

[BDG]

In the LRFD Specification, the general equation for design is shown below:

=
r n i i i
R R Q

For loads for which a maximum value of
i
is appropriate:

95 . 0 =
I R D i

For loads for which a minimum value of
i
is appropriate:

0 . 1
1
=
I R D
i

Ductility
For strength limit state for conventional design and details complying with the
LRFD Specifications and for all other limit states:

D
= 1.0

Redundancy
For the strength limit state for conventional levels of redundancy and for all
other limit states:

R
= 1.0

Operational Importance
For the strength limit state for typical bridges and for all other limit states:

I
= 1.0

For an ordinary structure with conventional design and details and
conventional levels of ductility, redundancy, and operational importance, it can
be seen that
i
= 1.0 for all cases. Since multiplying by 1.0 will not change
any answers, the load modifier
i
has not been included in this example.

For actual designs, the importance factor may be a value other than one. The
importance factor should be selected in accordance with the ADOT Bridge
Design Guidelines.

6
SUBSTRUCTURE
Loads
Section 3

[10.5.2]

[10.5.3]

Loads
There are several major changes and some minor changes concerning the
determination of loads. The DC loads must be kept separate from the DW
loads since different load factors apply. The live load is different as seen in the
superstructure design. The dynamic load allowance is a constant rather than a
function of the span and only applies to members above the ground. The
Longitudinal Force in the Standard Specifications has been modified and
replaced by the Braking Force. A vehicle collision force relating to protection
of piers or abutments has been added. The wind and wind on live load is
similar but has a modification factor for elevations above 30 feet. The vertical
wind pressure is the same but the specification clarifies how to apply the force
to the proper load group. The lateral earth pressure includes better clarification
of the following items: when to use the Rankine or Coulomb Method, when to
use active or at rest pressure, and when to use the equivalent fluid pressure
method. The discussion of dead and live load surcharges is enhanced.

Figure 4

Abutment 1 is pinned while Abutment 2 is expansion. The pinned abutment
will resist externally applied longitudinal forces. The expansion abutment will
resist the friction and internal forces from the deformation of the bearing pads.
Since determining which abutment is critical is not obvious, the forces at each
abutment will be determined.

Limit States
For substructure design, foundation design at the service limit state includes
settlement, lateral displacement and overall stability.

Foundation design at the strength limit state includes bearing resistance,
limiting eccentricity (excessive loss of contact), sliding at the base of the
footing, and structural resistance. Three strength limit states require
investigation. Strength I is the basic load combination without wind. Strength
III is the load combination including wind exceeding 55 mph. Strength V is
the load combination combining normal vehicular use with a wind of 55 mph.
7
[3.6.5]

For substructure design, Extreme Event I load combination includes seismic
events while Extreme Event II load combination includes collision of
substructure units by vehicles. These limit states are not considered in this
example.

A diagram showing the general dimensions (feet) for the abutment follows:

Figure 5
8
[3.5]

[3.5.1]

PERMANENT LOADS

DC Dead Load Structural Components

DC superstructure dead load includes self-weight including intermediate and
abutment diaphragms and barriers.

DC Superstructure = 1229.30 k
e
long
= (16.00 / 2 - 5.50 - 1.25) = 1.25 ft
M
long
= (1229.30)(1.25) = 1537 ft-k

DC substructure dead load includes the weight of the abutment including end
blocks, wingwalls and footing.

Item N H W L Weight X
A
M
A

Backwall 1 1 7.67 1.00 46.41 53.39 9.00 481
Seat 1 1 1.00 1.00 46.41 6.96 10.00 70
1 1/2 1.00 1.00 46.41 3.48 9.83 34
Stem 1 1 13.33 4.00 46.41 371.19 7.50 2784
Footing 1 1 3.50 16.00 49.52 415.97 8.00 3328
End Blk 2 1 6.64 3.45 3.00 20.62 7.00 144
2 1/2 6.46 2.67 3.00 7.76 7.00 54
Wing 2 1 21.00 1.00 10.87 68.48 10.75 736

Total 947.85 7631

DC Substructure = 947.85 k
c.g. =7631 / 947.85 = 8.051 ft
e
long
= 16.00 / 2 8.051 = -0.051 ft
M
long
= (947.85)(-0.051) = -48 ft-k

DW Dead Load Wearing Surface and Utilities

The DW superstructure load includes the future wearing surface and utility
loads. This bridge has no utilities.

DW = 85.63 k
M
long
= (85.63)(1.25) = 107 ft-k

EV - Vertical Earth Pressure

The LRFD Specification does not provide data on unit weights of well
compacted soils. For this example use a vertical earth pressure based on a unit
weight of 0.120 kcf. In actual design use the values specified in the
Geotechnical Report.

9

[3.11.5]

[C3.11.5.3]

Design for the full height of the wall even though the soil only extends to the
top of the seat. To avoid the complexities of how to deal with the weight of
the approach slab it is simpler to design for the taller height of soil.

Item N H W L Weight X
A
M
A

Toe 1 1 3.00 5.50 49.52 98.05 2.75 270
Heel 1 1 21.00 6.50 46.41 760.20 12.75 9693
Seat 1 1 1.00 1.00 46.41 -5.57 10.00 -56
1 1/2 1.00 1.00 46.41 -2.78 9.83 -27
Total 849.89 9879
Note: Some numbers may not add up due to rounding.

EV = 850 kips
c.g. = 9879 / 849.89 = 11.624 ft
e
long
= 16.00 / 2 11.624 = -3.624 ft
M
long
= (849.89)(-3.624) = -3080 ft-k

EH - Horizontal Earth Pressure

Two decisions must be made before analysis begins: (1) whether to use at-rest
or active lateral earth pressure and (2) whether to use the Rankine or Coulomb
theory.

Typical abutments supported on cohensionless soils with elastomeric bearings
supporting the superstructure with structural grade backfill will deflect
adequately to mobilize active soil pressure. Therefore, active pressure will be
used in the design.

The LRFD Specification states that the Coulomb method is necessary for
design of retaining walls where the back face of the wall interferes with the
development of the full sliding surfaces in the backfill soil assumed in the
Rankine theory. Abutment concrete cantilever walls with short heels will
require the use of the Coulomb method. Abutment concrete cantilever walls
with long heels may be designed with either the Rankine or Coulomb method.

The LRFD Specification indicates that the Rankine method of determining
lateral earth pressure is not appropriate when the heel is determined to be a
short heel. However, the use of the Coulomb Method is a major departure
from ADOT past practice. In addition, a value of friction must be considered
in the Coulomb Method yet the recommended value varies widely.

10

[BDG]

[3.11.5.1-1]

Foundation Analysis and Design by Bowles partially agrees with the LRFD
Specification but comes to the conclusion that neither method in its pure form
can be used. However, either method can be used if the following
modification is made: the soil loads are applied to a vertical line extending
from the end of the heel and the soil on top of the heel is treated as a static
load.

The Rankine formula provides more conservative designs, is allowed per
ADOT Bridge Design Guidelines and will be used in this example.

The soil data will be provided in the Geotechnical Report. For this problem
assume that the soil extends to the full height of the abutment with the
following properties:

s
= 0.120 kcf
k
a
= 0.295

The lateral earth pressure is assumed to be linearly proportional to the depth of
earth and taken as:

p = k
a
s
z = (0.295)(0.120)(24.50) = 0.867 ksf/ft

EH = 0.5(0.867)(24.50)(46.41) = 493.08 k/ft

The resultant acts at a height of H/3 above the base of the wall.

M
long
= (493.08)(24.50) / 3 = 4027 ft-k/ft

11

[3.6.1.1]

[3.6.1.1.1]

[3.6.1.1.2]

TRANSIENT LOADS

LL Vehicular Live Load

The number of design lanes is the integer part of the ratio w/12 = 42.00/12 = 3
where w is the clear roadway width. The critical live load reaction is the
combination of the design lane (52.19 kips) and design truck (67.80 kips).
Refer to the Superstructure Example 1 for calculation of the live load reactions.
Apply the multiple presence factor, m, for the reaction. Critical values are
underlined.

One Vehicle P = (52.19 + 67.80)(1.20)(1) = 143.99 k
e
L
= 16.00 / cos(15) = 16.56 ft
M
trans
= (143.99)(16.56) = 2384 ft-k
M
long
= (143.99)(1.25) = 180 ft-k

Two Vehicles P = (52.19 + 67.80)(1.00)(2) = 239.98 k
e
L
= 10.00 / cos(15) = 10.35 ft
M
trans
= (239.98)(10.35) = 2484 ft-k
M
long
= (239.98)(1.25) = 300 ft-k

Three Vehicles P = (52.19 + 67.80)(0.85)(3) = 305.97 k
e
L
= 4.00 / cos(15) = 4.14 ft
M
trans
= (305.97)(4.14) = 1267 ft-k
M
long
= (305.97)(1.25) = 382 ft-k

Figure 6
12

[3.6.2]

[3.6.4]

To simplify the problem, the maximum reaction and moments will be used
even though they do not occur simultaneously. This will reduce the number of
load cases without substantially simplifying the design.

IM Dynamic Load Allowance

Dynamic load allowance need not apply for foundation components that are
entirely below ground such as footings. For the portion of the abutment above
the ground, the dynamic load allowance is only a design load for the stem.

BR Vehicular Braking Force

The braking force shall be taken as the greater of:

25 percent of the axle weights of the design truck or design tandem
V = (0.25)(32 + 32 + 8) = 18.00 k <= Critical
V = (0.25)(25 + 25) = 12.50 k

5 percent of the design truck plus lane load or 5 percent of the design
tandem plus lane load
V = (0.05)[32 + 32 + 8 + (160.00)(0.640)] = 8.72 k
V = (0.05)[25 + 25 + (160.00)(0.640)] = 7.62 k

It should be noted that the truck load will always control and the tandem force
need not be calculated.

The braking force shall be placed in all design lanes that are considered to be
loaded which carry traffic in the same direction. For this bridge the number of
lanes equals the clear roadway width of 42 feet divided by 12 foot lanes = 3.5.
Since only full lanes are used, use 3 lanes. The bridge is a one directional
structure with all lanes headed in the same direction. Therefore, all design
lanes shall be simultaneously loaded and the multiple presence factor shall
apply.

BR = (18.00)(3)(0.85) = 45.90 k

This load is applied 6 feet above the deck surface. However, due to the pinned
restraint the longitudinal force will be applied at the seat level.

V
long
= 45.90 cos(15) = 44.34 k
V
trans
= 45.90 sin(15) = 11.88 k
M
long
= (44.34)(16.83) = 746 ft-k
M
trans
= (11.88)(16.83) = 200 ft-k

13
[3.11.6.4]

[3.11.6.4-1]

[3.11.6.4-1]

[C3.4.1]

[3.11.6.5]

LS - Live Load Surcharge

A live load surcharge shall be applied where a vehicular load is expected to act
on the surface of the backfill within a distance equal to one-half the wall height
behind the back face of the wall.

The increase in horizontal pressure due to live load surcharge may be
estimated as:

p
= k
s
h
eq

where:

s
= total unit weight of soil = 0.120 kcf
k = coefficient of lateral earth pressure, k
a
, for walls that deflect
h
eq
= equivalent height of soil for vehicular load from Table 1
= 2.0 ft for abutment height > 20.0 feet

p
= (0.295)(0.120)(2.0) = 0.0708 ksf

P = (0.120)(2.0)(6.5)(46.41) = 72.40 k
V
long
= (0.0708)(24.50)(46.41) = 80.50 k
M
long
= (80.50)(24.50) / 2 = 986 ft-k

The vertical weight of the soil surcharge is to be included for foundation
designs where the load increases the load effect but ignored where the load
increases the resistance. For bearing resistance the vertical soil weight on the
heel will increase the total load and therefore the load effect and should be
included. For sliding resistance and overturning the vertical soil weight will
increase the resistance and therefore should be ignored.

If the vehicular loading is transmitted through a structural slab, which is also
supported by means other than earth, a corresponding reduction in the
surcharge loads may be permitted. The standard ADOT approach slab satisfies
this criterion. However, the abutment is tall compared to the slab length and
no method is provided to determine the amount of the reduction, so the full live
load surcharge will be used. In addition, construction vehicles could produce a
live load surcharge before the approach slab is constructed.

14
[3.8]

[3.8.1.1]

Wind on
Superstructure
[3.8.1.2.1]

WS Wind Load on Structure

Wind pressures are based on a base design wind velocity of 100 mph. For
structures with heights over 30 feet above the groundline, a formula is
available to adjust the wind velocity. The wind is assumed to act uniformly on
the area exposed to the wind. The exposed area is the sum of the areas of all
components as seen in elevation taken perpendicular to the assumed wind
direction.

Height = 7.50 + 2.67 + 0.02(44.83) = 11.07 ft
Area = (11.07)(160.00) = 1770 ft
2

The base pressure for girder bridges corresponding to the 100 mph wind is
0.050 psf. The minimum wind loading shall not be less than 0.30 klf. Since
the girder bridge has spans greater than 125 feet, the wind must be evaluated
for various angles of attack. The center of gravity of the loads is located 16.83
+ (11.07) / 2 = 22.36 feet above the bottom of the footing. Wind force in the
direction of the span will be applied at the top of the seat due to the pinned
condition. Wind pressures for various angles of attack are taken from Table
3.8.1.2.2-1. Refer to Figure 4 for proper inclusion of the skew affect for the
load combinations. Critical values are underlined.

Pinned Abutment

0 Degree Skew Angle
V
long
= [(1770)(0.050)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.000)cos(15) = 11.45 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.050)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.000)sin(15) = 42.74 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.050)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.000)(16.83)cos(15)
= 256 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.050)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.000)(16.83)sin(15)
= 956 ft-k

15 Degree Skew Angle
V
long
= [(1770)(0.044)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.006)cos(15) = 20.34 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.044)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.006)sin(15) = 40.36 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.044)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.006)(16.83)cos(15)
= 398 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.044)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.006)(16.83)sin(15)
= 887 ft-k

15

V
long
= [(1770)(0.041)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.012)cos(15) = 29.91 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.041)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.012)sin(15) = 40.55 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.041)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.012)(16.83)cos(15)
= 555 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.041)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.012)(16.83)sin(15)
= 876 ft-k

V
long
= [(1770)(0.033)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.016)cos(15) = 34.91 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.033)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.016)sin(15) = 35.54 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.033)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.016)(16.83)cos(15)
= 629 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.033)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.016)(16.83)sin(15)
= 754 ft-k

V
long
= [(1770)(0.017)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.019)cos(15) = 36.38 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.017)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.019)sin(15) = 23.24 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.017)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.019)(16.83)cos(15)
= 634 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.017)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 + (1770)(0.019)(16.83)sin(15)
= 471 ft-k

Expansion Abutment

0 Degree Skew Angle
V
long
= [(1770)(0.050)sin(15)]/2 = 11.45 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.050)cos(15)]/2 = 42.74 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.050)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 = 256 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.050)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 = 956 ft-k

V
long
= [(1770)(0.044)sin(15)]/2 = 10.08 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.044)cos(15)]/2 = 37.61 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.044)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 = 225 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.044)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 = 841 ft-k

16

Wind on
Substructure
[3.8.1.2.3]

V
long
= [(1770)(0.041)sin(15)]/2 = 9.39 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.041)cos(15)]/2 = 35.05 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.041)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 = 210 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.041)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 = 784 ft-k

V
long
= [(1770)(0.033)sin(15)]/2 = 7.56 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.033)cos(15)]/2 = 28.21 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.033)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 = 169 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.033)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 = 631 ft-k

V
long
= [(1770)(0.017)sin(15)]/2 = 3.89 k
V
trans
= [(1770)(0.017)cos(15)]/2 = 14.53 k

M
long
= [(1770)(0.017)(22.36)sin(15)]/2 = 87 ft-k
M
trans
= [(1770)(0.017)(22.36)cos(15)]/2 = 325 ft-k

A conservative answer can be achieved by simplifying the problem by using
the maximum values in each direction acting simultaneously. If wind controls
the design, the complexities of combining 5 wind combinations should be
performed. A summary of wind forces used in the design follows:

Pinned Expansion
V
long
= 36.38 k 11.45 k
V
trans
= 42.74 k 42.74 k

M
long
= 634 ft-k 256 ft-k
M
trans
= 956 ft-k 956 ft-k

The transverse and longitudinal forces to be applied directly to the substructure
are calculated from an assumed base wind pressure of 0.040 ksf. Because the
longitudinal wind blows opposite the earth pressure, the critical wind on
substructure load in the longitudinal direction will be zero.

V
long
= 0 k
V
trans
= 0.040[(10.50)(18.00)] = 7.56 k

M
long
= 0 ft-k
M
trans
= 0.040(10.50)(18.00)(15.50) = 117 ft-k

17
[3.8.1.3]

WL Wind Pressure on Vehicles

Wind pressure on vehicles is represented by a moving force of 0.10 klf acting
normal to and 6.0 feet above the roadway. Loads normal to the span should be
applied at a height of 24.50 + 6.00 = 30.50 ft

Pinned Abutment

0 Degree Skew Angle
V
long
= 160.00[(0.100)sin(15)/2 + (0.000)cos(15)] = 2.07 k
V
trans
= 160.00[(0.100)cos(15)/2 + (0.000)sin(15)] = 7.73 k

M
long
= 160.00[(0.100)(30.50)sin(15)/2 + (0.000)(16.83)cos(15)]
= 63 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00[(0.100)(30.50)cos(15)/2 + (0.000)(16.83)sin(15)]
= 236 ft-k

V
long
= 160.00[(0.088)sin(15)/2 + (0.012)cos(15)] = 3.68 k
V
trans
= 160.00[(0.088)cos(15)/2 + (0.012)sin(15)] = 7.30 k

M
long
= 160.00[(0.088)(30.50)sin(15)/2 + (0.012)(16.83)cos(15)]
= 87 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00[(0.088)(30.50)cos(15)/2 + (0.012)(16.83)sin(15)]
= 216 ft-k

V
long
= 160.00[(0.082)sin(15)/2 + (0.024)cos(15)] = 5.41 k
V
trans
= 160.00[(0.082)cos(15)/2 + (0.024)sin(15)] = 7.33 k

M
long
= 160.00[(0.082)(30.50)sin(15)/2 + (0.024)(16.83)cos(15)]
= 114 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00[(0.082)(30.50)cos(15)/2 + (0.024)(16.83)sin(15)]
= 210 ft-k

V
long
= 160.00[(0.066)sin(15)/2 + (0.032)cos(15)] = 6.31 k
V
trans
= 160.00[(0.066)cos(15)/2 + (0.032)sin(15)] = 6.43 k

M
long
= 160.00[(0.066)(30.50)sin(15)/2 + (0.032)(16.83)cos(15)]
= 125 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00[(0.066)(30.50)cos(15)/2 + (0.032)(16.83)sin(15)]
= 178 ft-k

18

V
long
= 160.00[(0.034)sin(15)/2 + (0.038)cos(15)] = 6.58 k
V
trans
= 160.00[(0.034)cos(15)/2 + (0.038)sin(15)] = 4.20 k

M
long
= 160.00[(0.034)(30.50)sin(15)/2 + (0.038)(16.83)cos(15)]
= 120 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00[(0.034)(30.50)cos(15)/2 + (0.038)(16.83)sin(15)]
= 107 ft-k

Expansion Abutment

0 Degree Skew Angle
V
long
= 160.00(0.100)sin(15)/2 = 2.07 k
V
trans
= 160.00(0.100)cos(15)/2 = 7.73 k

M
long
= 160.00(0.100)(30.50)sin(15)/2 = 63 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00(0.100)(30.50)cos(15)/2 = 236 ft-k

V
long
= 160.00(0.088)sin(15)/2 = 1.82 k
V
trans
= 160.00(0.088)cos(15)/2 = 6.80 k

M
long
= 160.00(0.088)(30.50)sin(15)/2 = 56 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00(0.088)(30.50)cos(15)/2 = 207 ft-k

V
long
= 160.00(0.082)sin(15)/2 = 1.70 k
V
trans
= 160.00(0.082)cos(15)/2 = 6.34 k

M
long
= 160.00(0.082)(30.50)sin(15)/2 = 52 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00(0.082)(30.50)cos(15)/2 = 193 ft-k

V
long
= 160.00(0.066)sin(15)/2 = 1.37 k
V
trans
= 160.00(0.066)cos(15)/2 = 5.10 k

M
long
= 160.00(0.066)(30.50)sin(15)/2 = 42 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00(0.066)(30.50)cos(15)/2 = 156 ft-k

V
long
= 160.00(0.034)sin(15)/2 = 0.70 k
V
trans
= 160.00(0.034)cos(15)/2 = 2.63 k

M
long
= 160.00(0.034)(30.50)sin(15)/2 = 21 ft-k
M
trans
= 160.00(0.034)(30.50)cos(15)/2 = 80 ft-k
19

[3.8.2]

[3.13]
[14.6.3.1]

[14.6.3.1-1]

A conservative answer for wind on live load can be achieved by using the
maximum values in each direction acting simultaneously. If wind controls the
design, the complexities of combining 5 wind directions should be performed.

Pinned Expansion
V
long
= 6.58 k 2.07 k
V
trans
= 7.73 k 7.73 k

M
long
= 125 ft-k 63 ft-k
M
trans
= 236 ft-k 236 ft-k

Vertical Wind Pressure

A vertical upward wind force of 0.020 ksf times the width of the deck shall be
applied at the windward quarter point of the deck. This load is only applied for
limit states which include wind but not wind on live load (Strength III Limit
State) and only when the direction of wind is taken to be perpendicular to the
longitudinal axis of the bridge. When applicable the wind loads are as shown:

P = (0.020)(44.83)(160) / 2 = -71.73 upward
M
trans
= [71.73(44.83) / 4]cos(15) = 777 ft-k
M
long
= [71.73(44.83) / 4]sin(15) = 208 ft-k

FR Friction Forces

Friction forces from the greased bearings caused by superstructure movement
will be transmitted to the substructure for Abutment 2, the expansion abutment.
These forces will occur during the stressing operation and for a short period of
time afterwards while the bridge undergoes long term prestress shortening.
This force was calculated for the elastomeric bearing for the Superstructure
Example 1 as repeated below:

H
bu
= P
u

P
u
= 1.25DC + 1.50DW

P
u
= 1.25(245.86) + 1.50(17.13) = 333.02 k

H
bu
= (0.10)(333.02) = 33.30 k per bearing pad

It is important to note that this force is already factored and only applies to
strength and extreme event limit states. Table 3.4.1-1 does list FR as a load
with a load factor of 1.0 for all limit states including service. However, this
FR does not apply to service limit states.
20

[14.6.3.1-2]

[BDG]

[BDG]

V
trans
= (33.30)(5 bearings)sin(15) = 43.09 k

V
long
= (33.30)(5 bearings)cos(15) = 160.83 k

M
trans
= (43.09)(16.83) = 725 ft-k

M
long
= (160.83)(16.83) = 2707 ft-k

Bearing Translation

The elastomeric bearing pad will also transmit forces to the substructure due to
horizontal displacements caused by temperature, shrinkage, creep and prestress
shortening. For the greased pad the shrinkage, creep and prestress shortening
are resisted as a friction load so there is no direct load for SH and CR. The
force due to deformation of an elastomeric bearing pad due to TU shall be
taken as:

rt
u
bu
h
GA H

=

u
= shear deformation from applicable strength and extreme event load
combinations in Table 3.4.1-1.

h
rt
= (0.5000 0.0747)(3 interior) + (0.2500 0.0374)(2 exterior) = 1.70

For a post-tensioned box girder with greased sliding pads the elastic shortening
and creep are assumed to be taken by the greased pad in a sliding mode.
Afterwards the grease hardens and the pad resists temperature movement by
deformation of the pad. The strength limit state load factor for TU
deformations is 0.50. The 0.65 factor reflects the fact that the pads are not
always constructed at the mean temperature. The temperature range for
elevations less than 3000 feet is 90 degrees.

u
= (0.50)(0.65)(0.000006)(90)(160)(12) = 0.337 in

10 . 10
70 . 1
337 . 0
) 14 ( ) 28 ( ) 130 . 0 ( = =
bu
H kips

The force from friction (33.30 k/pad) is higher than the force resulting from the
internal deformation of the elastomeric bearing (10.10 k/pad). This bearing
translation force only applies to the strength and extreme event load
combinations and is also already factored. Since the FR forces are greater than
the TU forces and only one force can occur at a time, only the FR forces will
be considered further.

21

[14.6.3.2-3]

[C14.6.3.2-1]

[14.6.3.2-3]

Bearing Rotation

Rotations in the elastomeric bearing pads will cause bending moments that will
be transmitted to the substructure. For unconfined elastomeric bearings the
moment shall be taken as:

( )
rt
s
c u
h
I E M

5 . 0 60 . 1 =

where:

I = moment of inertia of plan shape of bearing
I = WL
3
/12 = (28)(14)
3
/ 12 = 6403 in
3

E
c
= effective modulus of elastomeric bearing in compression
E
c
= 6GS
2
= 6(0.130)(11)
2
= 94.38 ksi

Refer to Example 1 Superstructure Bearing calculations.
S
= 0.008384 radians

Strength Limit States

199 12
70 . 1
008384 . 0
) 6403 ( ) 38 . 94 ( ) 5 . 0 ( ) 60 . 1 ( = =
u
M ft-k

M
long
= (199)(5 bearings)cos(15) = 961 ft-k

M
trans
= (199)(5 bearings)sin(15) = 258 ft-k

Again this moment is already factored. The 1.60 factor in the formula is the
load factor that allows for use of service limit rotations. This load only applies
to the strength and extreme limit states.

22

A summary of unfactored axial loads, shears and moments except as otherwise
noted follows:

Abutment 1 (Pinned)
Load P
max
P
min
V
long
V
trans
M
long
M
trans

kip kip kip kip ft-k ft-k
DC
super
1229 1229 0 0 1537 0
DC
sub
948 948 0 0 -48 0
DC 2177 2177 0 0 1489 0
DW 86 0 0 0 107 0
EV 850 850 0 0 -3080 0
EH 0 0 493 0 4027 0
LL 306 0 0 0 382 2484
BR 0 0 44 12 746 200
LS 72 0 81 0 986 0
WS
super
0 0 36 43 634 956
WS
sub
0 0 0 8 0 117
WS 0 0 36 51 634 1073
WS
vertical
0 -72 0 0 208 777
WL 0 0 7 8 125 236
FR * 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bearing
Rotation*
0 0 0 0 961 258

Abutment 2 (Expansion)
Load P
max
P
min
V
long
V
trans
M
long
M
trans

kip kip kip kip ft-k ft-k
DC
super
1229 1229 0 0 1537 0
DC
sub
948 948 0 0 -48 0
DC 2177 2177 0 0 1489 0
DW 86 0 0 0 107 0
EV 850 850 0 0 -3080 0
EH 0 0 493 0 4027 0
LL 306 0 0 0 382 2484
BR 0 0 0 0 0 0
LS 72 0 81 0 986 0
WS
super
0 0 11 43 256 956
WS
sub
0 0 0 8 0 117
WS 0 0 11 51 256 1073
WS
vertical
0 -72 0 0 208 777
WL 0 0 2 8 63 236
FR* 0 0 161 43 2707 725
Bearing
Rotation*
0 0 0 0 961 258
* Loads are factored and only apply to strength limit states
23

[3.4.1-1]

LOAD COMBINATIONS
STRENGTH I

Max = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV
+ 1.75(LL + BR +LS) + FR + Bearing

Min = 0.90DC + 0.65DW + 0.90EH + 1.00EV
+ 1.75(LL + BR + LS) + FR + Bearing

STRENGTH III

Max = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV
+ 1.40(WS + WS
vert
) + FR + Bearing

Min = 0.90DC + 0.65DW + 0.90EH + 1.00EV
+ 1.40(WS + WS
vert
) + FR + Bearing

STRENGTH IV

Max = 1.50DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV + FR + Bearing

STRENGTH V

Max = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV
+ 1.35(LL + BR + LS) + 0.40WS + 1.00WL + FR + Bearing

Min = 0.90DC + 0.65DW + 0.90EH + 1.00EV

SERVICE I
Max = 1.00(DC + DW + EH + EV) + 1.00(LL + BR + LS)
+ 0.30WS + 1.00WL

The moment due to bearing rotation and friction forces from the bearing only
apply to strength limit states and are already factored.

As previously discussed, CR and SH forces are not critical for this bridge and
are not included in the load combinations above.

24

General

The methods used to estimate loads for the design of foundations using LRFD
are fundamentally the same as the procedures used in the past for ASD. What
has changed is the way the loads are considered for evaluation of foundation
stability (bearing and sliding resistance of spread footing foundations) and
foundation deformation. The design of foundations supporting bridge
abutments should consider all limit states loading conditions applicable to the
structure being designed. The following Strength Limit States may control the
design and should be investigated:

Strength I Limit State will control for high live to dead load ratios.

Strength III or V will control for structures subjected to high wind loads

Strength IV Limit State will control for high dead to live load ratios

A spread footing foundation will be evaluated for the following failure
conditions:

1. Bearing Resistance Strength Limit States

2. Settlement Service I Limit State

3. Sliding Resistance Strength Limit States

4. Load Eccentricity (Overturning) Strength Limit States

5. Overall Stability Service I Limit State

6. Structural Resistance Service I and Strength Limit States

25

[11.5.3]

[C11.5.5-1]

[11.5.5]

[11.6.3.2-1]
1. Bearing Resistance

Bearing resistance check is a strength limit state. The appropriate strength
limit states are I, III and V. The maximum bearing stress will be found by
applying the maximum load factors to each applicable load. The Factored Net
Bearing Resistance Chart will be provided in the Geotechnical Report. The
load factors and loads are shown below:

Strength I (max) Limit State:

Figure 7

Strength I = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV +
1.75(LL + BR + LS) + FR + Bearing

P
max
= 1.25(2177) + 1.50(86) + 1.35(850) + 1.75(306 + 72) = 4659 k

Pinned Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.75(382 + 746 + 986) + 961 = 9643 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.75(2484 + 200 + 0)
+ 258 = 4955 ft-k

e
long
= e
B
= 9643 / 4659 = 2.070 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 4955 / 4659 = 1.064 ft

B = 16.00 2(2.070) = 11.86 ft (effective footing width)
L = 49.52 2(1.064) = 47.39 ft (effective footing length)

q
max
= 4659 / [(11.86)(47.39)] = 8.29 ksf
26

q
nveu
= 8.29 1.35(0.120)(6.50) = 7.24 ksf

Expansion Abutment

M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.75(382 + 0 + 986) + 2707 + 961 = 11044 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.75(2484 + 0 + 0)
+ 725 + 258 = 5330 ft-k

e
long
= e
B
= 11044 / 4659 = 2.370 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 5330 / 4659 = 1.144 ft


q
max
= 4659 / [(11.26)(47.23)] = 8.76 ksf

q
nveu
= 8.76 1.35(0.120)(6.50) = 7.71 ksf <= Critical

Strength III (max) Limit State:

Figure 8
27

Strength III = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV + 1.40(WS+ WS
vert
)
+ FR + Bearing

P
max
= 1.25(2177) + 1.50(86) + 1.35(850) = 3998 k

Pinned Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.40(634 + 208) + 961 = 7122 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.40(1073 + 777)
+ 258 = 2848 ft-k

e
long
= e
B
= 7122 / 3998 = 1.781 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 2848 / 3998 = 0.712 ft


q
max
= 3998 / [(12.44)(48.10)] = 6.68 ksf
q
nveu
= 6.68 1.35(0.120)(6.50) = 5.63 ksf

Expansion Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.40(256 + 208) + 2707 + 961 = 9300 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.40(1073 + 777)
+ 725 + 258 = 3573 ft-k

e
long
= e
B
= 9300 / 3998 = 2.326 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 3573 / 3998 = 0.894 ft


q
max
= 3998 / [(11.35)(47.73)] = 7.38 ksf
q
nveu
= 7.38 1.35(0.120)(6.50) = 6.33 ksf

28

Strength V (max) Limit State:

Figure 9

Strength V = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV

P
max
= 1.25(2177) + 1.50(86) + 1.35(850) + 1.35(306 + 72) = 4508 k

Pinned Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.35(382+746+986) + 0.40(634) + 1.00(125) + 961 = 9176 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.35(2484 + 200 + 0)
+ 0.40(1073) + 1.00(236) + 258 = 4547 ft-k

e
long
= e
B
= 9176 / 4508 = 2.035 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 4547 / 4508 = 1.009 ft

B = 16.00 2(2.035) = 11.93 ft
L = 49.52 2(1.009) = 47.50 ft

q
max
= 4508 / [(11.93)(47.50)] = 7.96 ksf
q
nveu
= 7.96 1.35(0.120)(6.50) = 6.91 ksf
29

Expansion Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.35(382+0+986) + 0.40(256) + 1.00(63) + 2707 + 961
= 10662 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.35(2484 + 0 + 0)
+ 0.40(1073) + 1.00(236) + 725 + 258 = 5002 ft-k

e
long
= e
B
= 10662 / 4508 = 2.365 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 5002 / 4508 = 1.110 ft


q
max
= 4508 / [(11.27)(47.30)] = 8.46 ksf
q
nveu
= 8.46 1.35(0.120)(6.50) = 7.41 ksf

The maximum factored net bearing stress is 7.71 ksf for Strength I (max) Limit
State at the expansion abutment. The factored net bearing resistance from the
Factored Net Bearing Resistance Chart from the geotechnical report as shown
in Figure 10 below is 9.20 ksf. Therefore, the bearing resistance criterion is
satisfied.

Figure 10
30
[11.5.2]

[BDG]

2. Settlement

Settlement is a service limit state. For a single span bridge settlement and
differential settlement will not cause structural distress to the superstructure
but must be considered for the bearing and joint design. There are also limits
to settlement to ensure a smooth ride. The Geotechnical Foundation Report
will provide a chart that plots the factored net bearing stress versus the
effective footing width for various settlement curves. This chart is specific for
a given effective footing length and embedment depth. The geotechnical
engineer will include the bearing resistance factor in the chart since the factor
is a function of variables only the geotechnical engineer can determine.

The bridge engineer will determine the amount of settlement that the bridge
can tolerate, determine the actual bearing stress and compare the corresponding
settlement determined from the chart to the tolerable settlement. As an
alternative the bridge engineer may determine the amount of settlement that the
bridge can tolerate, determine the maximum bearing stress from the chart for a
given settlement and compare the actual bearing stress to the maximum. The
bridge engineer will also evaluate whether the structure can handle the
estimated horizontal movement.

Bridge Group guidance on this topic is under development. Refer to the
Bridge Design Guidelines for the most current guideline. The proposed
criterion is to limit the maximum settlement to 3 inches per 100 feet for simple
span bridges corresponding to a tolerable angle of (3) / [(100)(12)] = 0.0025
radians. For a span of 160 feet the corresponding tolerable settlement equals
(3)[(160) / (100)] = 4.80 inches. The example was originally developed for a
rotation limit of 0.0004 radians. The 0.004 radian value is used in the
elastomeric bearing design and subsequent load combinations and was not
recalculated using the 0.0025 radian criterion. For the service limit state,
forces from the bearing rotation and bearing friction are not included.

Service I Limit State
P
max
= 1.0(DC + DW + EH + EV) + 1.0(LL + BR + LS)
+ 0.3WS + 1.0WL

P
max
= 1.0(2177 + 86 + 0 + 850) +1.0(306 + 0 + 72) = 3491 kips

Pinned Abutment

M
long
= 1.0(1489 + 107 + 4027 3080) + 1.0(382 + 746 + 986)
+ 0.3(634) +1.0(125) = 4972 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.0(0) + 1.0(2484 + 200) + 0.3(1073) + 1.0(236)
= 3242 ft-k
31

e
long
= e
B
= 4972 / 3491 = 1.424 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 3242 / 3491 = 0.929 ft

B = 16.00 2(1.424) = 13.15 ft (footing effective width)
L = 49.52 2(0.929) = 47.66 ft (footing effective length)

q
tveu
= 3491 / [(13.15)(47.66)] = 5.57 ksf

The total factored equivalent uniform vertical bearing stress, q
tveu
, at the base
of the footing is 5.57 ksf. To determine the corresponding settlement for this
bearing stress, the equivalent net uniform bearing stress is required. To
determine the equivalent net uniform bearing stress, the factored overburden
stress is subtracted.

q
nveu
= 5.57 1.0(0.120)(6.50) = 4.79 ksf

The Factored Net Bearing Resistance Chart is only valid for a specific
effective footing length, L, and embedment depth of 6.50 feet. The bridge
engineer will enter the chart for an effective footing width, B = 13.15 feet, for
a net equivalent uniform bearing stress of 4.79 ksf. From the chart the
corresponding settlement is approximately 0.95 inch. Refer to Figure 11.

Figure 11

32

Expansion Abutment

M
long
= 1.0(1489 + 107 + 4027 3080) + 1.0(382 + 986)
+ 0.3(256) + 1.0(63) = 4051 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.0(0) + 1.0(2484) + 0.3(1073) + 1.0(236)
= 3042 ft-k

e
long
= e
B
= 4051 / 3491 = 1.160 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 3042 / 3491 = 0.871 ft


q
tveu
= 3491 / [(13.68)(47.78)] = 5.34 ksf

The gross equivalent uniform bearing stress at the base of the footing is 5.34
ksf. To determine the corresponding settlement for this bearing stress, the
equivalent net uniform bearing stress is required. To determine the equivalent
net uniform bearing stress, the factored overburden stress is subtracted.

q
nveu
= 5.34 1.0(0.120)(6.50) = 4.56 ksf

The bridge engineer will enter the Factored Net Bearing Resistance Chart for
an effective footing width B of 13.68 feet and a net equivalent uniform
bearing stress of 4.56 ksf to determine the corresponding settlement of 0.90
inch as seen in Figure 12.

Figure 12
33

The estimated settlement is less than the target settlement of 4.80 inches and
the settlement design limit state is satisfied. While not required, a more precise
method of analysis will be used to demonstrate how to determine the
settlement considering the phased application of the loads.

Phase 1 consists of construction of the abutment and earth fill. At this point
any differential settlement can be corrected with construction of the
superstructure since the expansion joint closure pour for the backwall has not
been poured.

P
max
= 1.0(948 + 850) = 1798 kips

M
long
= 1.0(-48 3080 + 4027) = 899 ft-k

M
trans
= 0 ft-k

e
long
= e
B
= 899 / 1798 = 0.500 ft
e
trans
= e
L
= 0 ft


q
tveu
= 1798 / [(15.00)(49.52)] = 2.42 ksf

q
nveu
= 2.42 1.0(0.120)(6.50) = 1.64 ksf

Figure 13

34

From the design chart the settlement is approximately 0.25 inches.

Phase 2 consists of the completed structure with all design loads applied. The
settlement from this case has been calculated to be 0.90 inch. The difference
between the settlement for Phase 1 and Phase 2 is both the design differential
settlement. The differential settlement equals 0.90 0.25 = 0.65 inches. Since
this value is less than the tolerable settlement of 4.80 inches the settlement
design limit state is satisfied.

35
[11.6.3.6]

[10.6.3.4]

[11.5.3]

[C11.5.5-2]

3. Sliding

Spread footings must be designed to resist lateral loads without sliding failure
of the foundation. The sliding resistance of a footing on cohesionless soil is
based on the normal stress and the interface friction between the foundation
and the soil. The Geotechnical Foundation Report should provide the
coefficient of sliding resistance, , for use in design. For this example,
assuming a cast-in-place footing, = tan = tan(30) = 0.577.

The Strength Limit States are used for this check. Since the resistance is based
on the reaction, minimum factors are used for all vertical loads and the vertical
weight of the live load surcharge is ignored on the footing heel. The maximum
factors are used with the horizontal forces.

Strength I (min) Limit State:

Figure 14

Max Strength I = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV
+ 1.75(LL + BR + LS) + FR

Min Strength I = 0.90DC + 0.65DW + 0.90EH + 1.00EV
+ 1.75(LL + BR + LS) + FR

Since DW is the future wearing surface, the surface may not be present for
some time if at all and the weight should be zero.

P
min
= 0.90(2177) + 0.65(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.00(850) = 2809 k

36

Pinned Abutment
V
long
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(493) + 1.35(0) + 1.75(0+44+81) = 958 k

V
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.75(0+12+0) = 21 k

( ) ( ) k V
u
958 21 958
2 2
= + =

V
n
= 0.80(0.577)(2809) = 1297 k

Expansion Abutment
V
long
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(493) + 1.35(0) + 1.75(0+0+81)
+ 161 = 1042 k

V
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.75(0+0+0) + 43
= 43 k

( ) ( ) k V
u
1043 43 1042
2 2
= + =

V
n
= 0.80(0.577)(2809) = 1297 k

Strength III (min) Limit State:

Figure 15

37

Max Strength III = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV
+ 1.40(WS + WS
vert
) + FR

Min Strength III = 0.90DC + 0.65DW + 0.90EH + 1.00EV
+ 1.40(WS + WS
vert
) + FR

P
min
= 0.90(2177) + 0.65(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.00(850) + 1.40(-72)
= 2709 k

Pinned Abutment
V
long
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(493) + 1.35(0) + 1.40(36) = 790 k

V
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.40(51) = 71 k

( ) ( ) k V
u
793 71 790
2 2
= + =

V
n
= 0.80(0.577)(2709) = 1250 k

Expansion Abutment
V
long
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(493) + 1.35(0) + 1.40(11) + 161
= 916 k

V
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.40(51) + 43
= 114 k

( ) ( ) k V
u
923 114 916
2 2
= + =

V
n
= 0.80(0.577)(2709) = 1250 k

Strength V (min) Limit State:

Figure 16
38

Max Strength V = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV
+ 1.35(LL + BR + LS) + 0.40WS +1.00WL + FR

Min Strength V = 0.90DC + 0.65DW + 0.90EH + 1.00EV
+ 1.35(LL + BR + LS) + 0.40WS +1.00WL + FR

P
min
= 0.90(2177) + 0.65(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.00(850) = 2809 k

Pinned Abutment
V
long
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(493) + 1.35(0) + 1.35(0 + 44 + 81)
+ 0.40(36) + 1.00(7) = 930 k

V
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.35(0 + 12 + 0)
+ 0.40(51) + 1.00(8) = 45 k

( ) ( ) k V
u
931 45 930
2 2
= + =

V
n
= 0.80(0.577)(2809) = 1297 k

Expansion Abutment
V
long
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(493) + 1.35(0) + 1.35(0 + 0 + 81)
+ 0.40(11) + 1.00(2) + 161 = 1016 k

V
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.35(0 + 0 + 0) + 0.40(51)
+ 1.00(8) + 43 = 71 k

( ) ( ) k V
u
1018 71 1016
2 2
= + =

V
n
= 0.80(0.577)(2809) = 1297 k

Since the resistance to sliding, V
n
, is greater than the factored load, V
u
, for all
strength limit states, the sliding criteria is satisfied.

39

[10.6.3.3]

4. Limiting Eccentricity (Overturning or Excessive Loss of Contact)

Spread footing foundations must be designed to resist overturning which
results from lateral and eccentric vertical loads. For LRFD, the criteria were
revised to reflect the factoring of loads. As a result, the eccentricity of footings
for factored loads must be less than B/4 and L/4 for footings on soil. These
new limits were developed by direct calibration with ASD. The effect of
factoring the loads is to increase the eccentricity of the load resultant such that
the permissible eccentricity is increased.

The appropriate strength limit states are I, III and V. The maximum
eccentricity will be found by applying the maximum load factors to each
lateral or eccentrically applied load but to apply the minimum load factors to
the resisting loads. The load combinations are the same as for sliding except
moments are grouped instead of lateral loads.

Strength I (min) Limit State

Max Strength I = 1.25DC + 1.50DW + 1.50EH + 1.35EV

Min Strength I = 0.90DC + 0.65DW + 0.90EH + 1.00EV

P
min
= 0.90(2177) + 0.65(0) + 0.90(0) + 1.00(850) = 2809 k

Pinned Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.75(382 + 746 + 986) + 961 = 9643 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.75(2484 + 200 + 0)
+ 258 = 4955 ft-k

e
long
= 9643 / 2809 = 3.43 ft < B / 4 = 16.00 / 4 = 4.00 ft
e
trans
= 4955 / 2809 = 1.76 ft < L / 4 = 49.52 / 4 = 12.38 ft

Expansion Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.75(382 + 0 + 986) + 2707 + 961 = 11044 k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.75(2484 + 0 + 0)
+ 725 + 258 = 5330 ft-k

e
long
= 11044 / 2809 = 3.93 ft < 4.00 ft
e
trans
= 5330 / 2809 = 1.90 ft < 12.38 ft
40

Strength III (min) Limit State:

P
min
= 0.90(2177) + 0.65(0) + 0.90(0) + 1.00(850) +1.4(-72) = 2709 k

Pinned Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.40(634 + 208) + 961 = 7122 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.40(1073 + 777)
+ 258 = 2848 ft-k

e
long
= 7122 / 2709 = 2.63 ft < 4.00 ft
e
trans
= 2848 / 2709 = 1.05 ft < 12.38 ft

Expansion Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.40(256 + 208) + 2707 + 961 = 9300 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.40(1073 + 777)
+ 725 + 258 = 3573 ft-k

e
long
= 9300 / 2709 = 3.43 ft < 4.00 ft
e
trans
= 3573 / 2709 = 1.32 ft < 12.38 ft

Strength V (min) Limit State:

P
min
= 0.90(2177) + 0.65(0) + 0.90(0) + 1.00(850) =2809 k

Pinned Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.35(382 + 746 + 986) + 0.40(634) + 1.00(125) + 961
= 9176 ft-k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.35(2484 + 200 + 0)
+ 0.40(1073) + 1.00(236) + 258 = 4547 ft-k

e
long
= 9176 / 2809 = 3.27 ft < 4.00 ft
e
trans
= 4547 / 2809 = 1.62 ft < 12.38 ft

41

[11.5.2]

[11.5.3]

BACKWALL
DESIGN

Expansion Abutment
M
long
= 1.25(1489) + 1.50(107) + 1.50(4027) + 1.00(-3080)
+ 1.35(382 + 0 + 986) + 0.40(256) + 1.00(63) + 2707 + 961
= 10662 k

M
trans
= 1.25(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.50(0) + 1.35(0) + 1.35(2484 + 0 + 0)
+ 0.40(1073) + 1.00(236) + 725 + 258 = 5002 ft-k

e
long
= 10662 / 2809 = 3.80 ft < 4.00 ft
e
trans
= 5002 / 2809 = 1.78 ft < 12.38 ft

Since the eccentricity for all strength limit states is within the allowable limit,
the abutment is stable.

5. Overall Stability

Overall stability is a service limit state. This will depend upon the properties
of the supporting soil as well as the geometry of the land including any slopes.
This design check is the responsibility of the geotechnical engineer. The
results of this analysis should be included in the Final Foundation Report.

6. Structural Resistance

All components of the abutment must satisfy the appropriate strength and
serviceability requirements. The three major parts of the abutment consist of
the backwall, stem and footing. The design will be based on a foot wide strip.

Backwall Design

Figure 17
42
[3.5.1]

[3.11.5.3]

[3.11.6.4]

[3.6.1]

[3.6.2]

DC Loads: The backwall must support the eccentric load from the seat
including the self-weight of half the approach slab. A conservative assumption
is to ignore the approach slab where this load reduces the critical moment.

Seat
M = 0.15[(1.00)(1.00)(1.00) +0.50(1.00)(1.00)(0.83)] = -0.21 ft-k/ft

Approach Slab
M = 0.15(1.00)cos(15)(7.50)(1.00) = -1.09 ft-k/ft

DW Load: The approach slab could have a wearing surface added in the
future.

Wearing surface
M = 0.025(1.00)cos(15)(7.50)(1.00) = -0.18 ft-k/ft

EH Load: The horizontal soil pressure will exert an inward force on the
backwall. To simplify the problem, the soil is conservatively assumed to
extend to the top of the backwall.

V = (0.295)(0.120)(7.67)
2
/ 2 = 1.041 k/ft
M = (1.041)(7.67) / 3 = 2.66 ft-k/ft

LS Load: The live load surcharge will not be seen by the backwall after the
approach slab is constructed. Live load vehicles acting within a distance equal
to one-half the wall height behind the back face of the wall will be carried by
the approach slab. For this short wall height the live load surcharge can be
ignored.

LL Load: The live load vehicle will react through the approach slab seat
producing a moment in the backwall. Assuming a 45 degree angle of
distribution along the backwall, the distribution width of one vehicle will be
7.67 + 6.00/cos(15) + 7.67 = 21.55 feet. For two vehicles separated by 6 feet
the distribution width will be 7.67 + 3(6.00)/cos(15) + 7.67 = 33.97 feet. For
three vehicles each separated by 6 feet, the distribution width will be 7.67 +
5(6.00)/cos(15) + 7.67 = 46.40 feet. The resulting live load moment including
the multiple presence factor is:

M = [32.00(1)(1.20) / 21.55](1.00) = -1.78 ft-k/ft
M = [32.00(2)(1.00) / 33.97](1.00) = -1.88 ft-k/ft
M = [32.00(3)(0.85) / 46.40](1.00) = -1.76 ft-k/ft

IM Load: the dynamic load allowance of 33 percent applies to the backwall.

M = (-1.88)(0.33) = -0.62 ft-k/ft

43
[3.6.4]

Reduction due to
Earth Pressure
[3.11.7]

BR Load: The effect of braking vehicles on the top of the backwall and
approach slab must be included. The 18 kip braking force previously
calculated for the footing design is intended to reflect the braking force applied
to the superstructure. Since only an axle can react on the backwall, the force
may be proportioned as follows: BR = 18.00[(32) / (32 + 32 + 8)] = 8.00 kips.
Assume that the backwall resists the entire force without assistance from the
approach slab.

V = [8.00(1)(1.20) / 21.55] = 0.445 k/ft
V = [8.00(2)(1.00) / 33.97] = 0.471 k/ft
V = [8.00(3)(0.85) / 46.40] = 0.440 k/ft

M = (0.445)(7.67) = 3.41 ft-k/ft
M = (0.471)(7.67) = 3.61 ft-k/ft
M = (0.440)(7.67) = 3.37 ft-k/ft

Since wind is not a design force for the backwall design, Strength I will be the
controlling limit state. Since all the forces are not in the same direction, use
the minimum load factor when the force reduces the magnitude of the final
result.

For horizontal earth pressure, use half the value when opposing the primary
direction of loads. This reduction need not be combined with the minimum
load factor specified in Table 3.4.1-2.

A summary of unfactored backwall shears and moments follows:

Load V
pos
V
neg
M
pos
M
neg

k/ft k/ft ft-k/ft ft-k/ft
DC
backwall
0 0 0 -0.21
DC
Appr slab
0 0 0 -1.09
DW 0 0 0 -0.18
EH 1.041 0 2.66 0
LL 0 0 0 -1.88
IM 0 0 0 -0.62
BR 0.471 -0.471 3.61 -3.61

44

[3.4.1]

[5.7.3.1.1-4]

[5.7.2.1]

[5.7.2.2]

[C5.7.2.1]

[C5.5.4.2.1-1]
[5.5.4.2.1]

[5.7.3.2.2-1]

Maximum
Reinforcing
[5.7.3.3.1]
Standard ADOT practice is to use a minimum #6 @ 12 inches for the vertical
reinforcing in both faces unless calculations require additional reinforcing.

Strength I Limit State

M
u
= 1.25(-0.21 - 1.09) + 1.50(-0.18) + 0.50(2.66)
+ 1.75[-1.88 0.62 3.61] = -11.26 ft-k/ft <= Critical

Assuming the approach slab is supported on soil and DC
Appr slab
= 0.

M
u
= 0.90(-0.21) + 1.50(2.66) + 1.75(3.61) = 10.12 ft-k/ft

Try # 6 @ 12 inches
A
s
= 0.44 in
2
/ft
d
s
= 12.00 2.00 clear 0.75 / 2 = 9.63 in

( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
870 . 0
12 85 . 0 5 . 3 85 . 0
60 44 . 0
' 85 . 0
1
=

= =
b f
f A
c
c
y s
in

6 . 0 090 . 0
63 . 9
870 . 0
< = =
s
d
c

Therefore, f
s
in Equation 5.7.3.1.1-4 may be replaced by f
y
.

( ) ( ) 74 . 0 870 . 0 85 . 0
1
= = = c a in

The net tensile strain in the reinforcing is:

030 . 0 1
870 . 0
63 . 9
003 . 0 1 003 . 0 = |
\
|
= |
\
|
=
c
d
t
t

Since the net tensile strain,
t
= 0.030 > 0.005, the section is tension-controlled.
Since the section is tension-controlled, the reduction factor = 0.90.

( ) ( ) ( ) 33 . 18 12
2
74 . 0
63 . 9 60 44 . 0 90 . 0 =
(
=
n
M ft-k/ft

Since the factored flexural resistance is greater than the factored load, the
section is adequate for flexure.

The provision that limited the amount of reinforcing in a section was deleted in
2005.

45
Minimum
Reinforcing
[5.7.3.3.2]

[5.4.2.6]

Control of Cracking
[5.7.3.4]

[5.4.2.6]

[3.4.1]

Check section for minimum reinforcing criteria:

( )
288
6
12 ) 12 (
6
2 2
=
= =
bh
S
c
in
3
/ft

692 . 0 5 . 3 37 . 0 ' 37 . 0 = = =
c r
f f ksi

The amount of reinforcing shall be adequate to develop a factored flexural
resistance at least equal to the lesser of:

1.2M
cr
= 1.2(0.692)(288)12 = 19.93 ft-k/ft
1.33M
u
= 1.33(11.26) = 14.98 ft-k/ft <= Critical

Since the flexural resistance, M
n
= 18.33 ft-k/ft > 14.98 ft-k/ft, the minimum
reinforcing criteria is satisfied.

This section applies to all members in which tension in the cross-section
exceeds 80 percent of the modulus of rupture at service limit state.

For this requirement the modulus of rupture is:

449 . 0 5 . 3 24 . 0 ' 24 . 0 = = =
c r
f f ksi

0.80 f
r
= (0.80)(0.449) = 0.359 ksi

Service I Limit State controls as follows:

M
s
= 1.0(-0.21 1.09) + 1.0( 0.18) + 0.5(2.66)
+ 1.0(1.88 0.62 3.61) = -6.26 ft-k/ft <= Critical

M
s
= 1.0(-0.21) + 1.0(2.66) + 1.0(3.61) = 6.06 ft-k/ft

The stress in the uncracked section of the backwall under service loads, where
the section modulus was previously calculated, is as follows:

( ) ( )
ksi
S
M
f
c
s
s
261 . 0
288
12 26 . 6
=
= =

Since the service limit stress, f
s
= 0.261 ksi, in the section is less than 80
percent of the cracking stress, 0.80f
r
= 0.359, the provisions of this section
need not be satisfied.

46
Shrinkage &
Temperature
Reinforcement
[5.10.8]

Development of
Reinforcement
[5.11.2]

[5.11.2.1.1]

[5.11.2.1.3]

Splice Length
[5.11.5.3.1-1]

[5.11.5.3.1]

Reinforcing shall be distributed equally on both faces in both directions with a
minimum area of reinforcement satisfying:

( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
115 . 0
60 0 . 12 0 . 92 2
0 . 12 0 . 92 30 . 1
2
30 . 1
=
+

=
+
y
s
f h b
bh
A in
2

and 0.11 < A
s
< 0.60

The spacing shall not exceed:

3.0 times the thickness = (3.0)(12.0) = 36 in, or 18.0 in

Use #5 @ 12 inches for horizontal temperature and shrinkage reinforcement in
the backwall.

The vertical reinforcing must be developed on each side of the critical section
for its full development length.

Required development length for #6 bars:

For #11 bar and smaller
( ) ( ) ( )
in
f
f A
c
y b
6 . 17
5 . 3
60 44 . 0 25 . 1
'
25 . 1
=

=

but not less than 0.4d
b
f
y
= 0.4(0.75)(60) = 18.0 in

Modification Factors that decrease l
d
:

Spacing not less than 6 inch = 0.8

Excess reinforcing = 11.26 / 18.33 = 0.614

Required development:

l
d
= (0.8)(0.614)(18.0) = 8.8 in Use 1-0 minimum

A Class C splice is required for the vertical bars in the backwall since all the
bars are spliced at the same location and the area of reinforcing required
divided by the area provided is less than 2. A Class C splice requires a
minimum length of 1.7 l
d
.

Splice = 1.7(18.0)(0.8)(0.614) = 15.0 in Use 1-3

47
Diagonal Shear
[5.8]

[3.4.1]

[5.8.2.9]

[C5.8.2.9-1]

Simplified
Procedure
[5.8.3.4.1]

[5.8.3.3-3]

[5.8.3.3-1]

[5.8.3.3-2]

[5.8.2.4-1]

[5.8.2.1-2]

The diagonal tension shear may be determined a distance d
v
from the face of
the support. For simplicity determine the factored shear at the face. If the
section does not have adequate shear resistance the calculation should be
refined to use the factored shear at a distance d
v
from the support.


V
u
= 1.50(1.041) + 1.75(0.471) = 2.39 k/ft

The value for d
v
is the greater of the following:

d
v
= d
e
a / 2 = 9.63 0.74 / 2 = 9.26 in <= Critical
d
v
= 0.9d
e
= (0.9)(9.63) = 8.67 in
d
v
= 0.72h = (0.72)(12.00) = 8.64 in

For members having an overall depth of less than 16.0 inches the Simplified
Procedure may be used and = 2.0.

The concrete resistance is as follows:

v v c c
d b f V ' 0316 . 0 =

( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 14 . 13 26 . 9 0 . 12 5 . 3 0 . 2 0316 . 0 = =
c
V k/ft

Since the section will be checked as an unreinforced section for shear, V
s
will
be zero.

The nominal shear resistance is the lesser of:

V
n1
= V
c
+ V
s
= 13.14 k/ft <= Critical

V
n2
= 0.25f
c
b
v
d
v
= (0.25)(3.5)(12.0)(9.26) = 97.23 k/ft

Since the shear behavior of the backwall is similar to that of a slab, Equation
5.8.2.4-1 need not be satisfied. Therefore shear reinforcing can be omitted
when the factored shear is less than the factored resistance.

V
r
= V
n
= (0.90)(13.14) = 11.83 k/ft > 2.39 k/ft ok

48
Interface Shear
[5.8.4]

[5.8.4.1-4]

[5.8.4.1-5]

[5.8.4.3]

[5.8.4.1-3]

[5.8.4.1-1]
[5.8.4.1-2]

Minimum
Reinforcement
[5.8.4.4-1]

Interface shear transfer shall be considered across a given plane at an interface
between two concretes cast at different times such as the construction joint at
the base of the backwall.

The factored load was determined above to be V
u
= 2.39 k/ft.

The nominal shear resistance, V
ni
used in the design shall not be greater than
the lesser of:

V
ni
K
1
f
c
A
cv
, or

V
ni
K
2
A
cv

Where A
cv
= area of concrete considered to be engaged in interface shear
transfer.

For concrete placed against a clean concrete surface, free of laitance with
surface intentionally roughened to an amplitude of 0.25 inch:

c = 0.24 ksi
= 1.0
K
1
= 0.25
K
2
= 1.5 ksi

The nominal shear resistance of the interface plans shall be taken as:

V
ni
= cA
cv
+ (A
vf
f
y
+ P
c
)

V
ni
= (0.24)(12)(9.26) + 1.0(0.44)(60 + 0) = 53.07 k/ft

But not greater than the lesser of:

V
ni
= (0.25)(3.5)(12.0)(9.26) = 97.23 k/ft

V
ni
= (1.5)(12.0)(9.26) = 166.68 k/ft

V
ri
= V
ni
= (0.90)(53.07) = 47.76 k/ft V
ui
= 2.39 k/ft

The minimum area of interface shear reinforcement shall satisfy:

( ) ( ) ( )
09 . 0
60
26 . 9 0 . 12 050 . 0 05 . 0
=

=
y
cv
vf
f
A
A in
2
/ft

Since #6 at 12 inches is provided across the interface, the criteria is satisfied.

49
STEM DESIGN

[3.5.1]

Stem Design

The major loads on the stem are the horizontal earth pressure and the loads
transmitted from the superstructure to the substructure through the bearings or
pinned connection. Design is based on a one foot wide strip. Dimensions are
shown in feet.

Figure 18

DC Loads: The stem must resist the eccentric dead loads from the seat,
backwall, the approach slab and the superstructure.

Seat = 0.15[(1.00)(1.00)(2.50) +0.50(1.00)(1.00)(2.33)] = -0.55 ft-k/ft
Appr Slab = 0.15(1.00)cos(15)(7.50)(2.50) = -2.72 ft-k/ft
Backwall = 0.15(1.00)(7.67)(1.50) = -1.73 ft-k/ft
Super = 1229.30(0.75) / 48.48 = 19.02 ft-k/ft
DC = -0.55 -2.72 -1.73 + 19.02 = 14.02 ft-k/ft

DW Load: The approach slab could have a wearing surface added in the
future.
FWS Super = 85.63(0.75) / 48.48 = 1.32 ft-k/ft
FWS Appr Slab = 0.025(1.00)cos(15)(7.50)(2.50) = -0.45 ft-k/ft
DW = 1.32 0.45 = 0.87 k/ft

50
[3.11.5.3]

[3.11.6.4]

[3.6.1]

[3.6.2]

[3.6.4]

[3.13]

[14.6.3.2-3]

EH Load:

V = (0.295)(0.120)(21.00)
2
/ 2 = 7.81 k/ft
M = (7.81)(21.00) / 3 = 54.64 ft-k/ft

LS Load: The live load surcharge will be reduced by the presence of the
approach slab. However, ignore this effect for the design of the stem.

V = (0.295)(0.120)(2.00)(21.00) = 1.49 k/ft
M = (1.49)(21.00) / 2 = 15.61 ft-k/ft

LL Load: The live load will react through the bearing producing a moment in
the stem. For a fully loaded structure, three vehicles will be present.

M = [(52.19 + 67.80)(3)(0.85) / 48.48](0.75) = 4.73 ft-k/ft

IM Load: The dynamic load allowance of 33 percent applies only to the
design truck portion of the live load.

M = 0.33[(67.80)(3)(0.85) / 48.48](0.75) = 0.88 ft-k/ft

BR Load: From foundation load calculations the longitudinal forces are:

V = (44.34) / 48.48 = 0.91 k/ft
M = (44.34)(13.33) / 48.48 = 12.19 ft-k/ft

FR Load:

V = (160.83) / 48.48 = 3.32 k/ft
M = (160.83)(13.33) / 48.48 = 44.22 ft-k/ft

Bearing Pad Rotation:

V = 0 k/ft
M = (961) / 48.48 = 19.82 ft-k/ft

The FR Load and Bearing Pad Rotation forces are already factored and only
apply to the strength limit states.

51

[3.4.1]

[5.7.3.1.1-4]

[5.7.2.1]

[5.7.2.2]

[C5.7.2.1]
A summary of unfactored stem shears and moments unless otherwise noted
follow:
Load V
long
M
long

k/ft ft-
k/ft
DC 0 14.02
DW 0 0.87
EH 7.81 54.64
LL 0 4.73
IM 0 0.88
BR 0.91 12.19
LS 1.49 15.61
FR* 3.32 44.22
Bearing
Rotation*
0 19.82
*Factored loads for strength limit states only

The flexural resistance for the stem will be controlled by the Strength I Limit
State.

Pinned Abutment
M
u
= 1.25(14.02) + 1.50(0.87) + 1.50(54.64)
+ 1.75(4.73 + 0.88 + 12.19 + 15.61) + 19.82 = 179.08 ft-k/ft

Expansion Abutment
M
u
= 1.25(14.02) + 1.50(0.87) + 1.50(54.64)
+ 1.75(4.73 + 0.88 + 0 + 15.61) + 44.22 + 19.82
= 201.97 ft-k/ft <= Critical

Try #8 @ 7 inches
A
s
= (0.79)(12 / 7) = 1.35 in
2
/ft
d
s
= 48.00 2.00 clear 1.00 / 2 = 45.50 in

( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
669 . 2
12 85 . 0 5 . 3 85 . 0
60 35 . 1
' 85 . 0
1
=

= =
b f
f A
c
c
y s
in

6 . 0 059 . 0
50 . 45
669 . 2
< = =
s
d
c
Therefore, f
y
may be used in above equation

( ) 27 . 2 669 . 2 ) 85 . 0 (
1
= = = c a in


52
048 . 0 1
669 . 2
50 . 45
003 . 0 1 003 . 0 = |
\
|
= |
\
|
=
c
d
t
t

[C5.5.4.2.1-1]
[5.5.4.2.1]

[5.7.3.2.2-1]

Maximum
Reinforcement
[5.7.3.3.1]

Minimum
Reinforcement
[5.7.3.3.2]

[5.4.2.6]

Control of Cracking
[5.7.3.4]

[5.4.2.6]

t
= 0.048 > 0.005, the section is tension-controlled.
Since the section is tension-controlled the reduction factor = 0.90.

( ) ( ) ( ) 52 . 269 12
2
27 . 2
50 . 45 60 35 . 1 90 . 0 =
(
=
n
M ft-k/ft

Since the factored flexural resistance is greater than the factored load, the
section is adequate for flexure.

2005.


( )
4608
6
48 ) 12 (
6
2 2
=
= =
bh
S
c
in
3
/ft

692 . 0 5 . 3 37 . 0 ' 37 . 0 = = =
c r
f f ksi


1.2M
cr
= 1.2(0.692)(4608)12 = 318.87 ft-k/ft
1.33M
u
= 1.33(201.97) = 268.62 ft-k/ft <= Critical

n
= 269.52 ft-k/ft > 268.62 ft-k/ft, the
minimum reinforcing criteria is satisfied.



449 . 0 5 . 3 24 . 0 ' 24 . 0 = = =
c r
f f ksi

0.80 f
r
= (0.80)(0.449) = 0.359 ksi

53

[3.4.1]

Shrinkage &
Temperature
Reinforcement
[5.10.8

Service I Limit State controls as follows:

Pinned Abutment
M
s
= 1.00(14.02) + 1.00(0.87) + 1.00(54.64)
+ 1.0(4.73 + 0.88 + 12.19 + 15.61) = 102.94 ft-k/ft <= Critical

Expansion Abutment
M
s
= 1.00(14.02) + 1.00(0.87) + 1.00(54.64)
+ 1.00(4.73 + 0.88 + 0 + 15.61) = 90.75 ft-k/ft

The stress in the uncracked section of the stem under service loads follows:

( ) ( )
ksi
S
M
f
c
s
s
268 . 0
4608
12 94 . 102
=
= =

Since this service limit stress is less than 80 percent of the cracking load stress,
the crack control criteria is satisfied.


( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
400 . 0
60 0 . 48 0 . 160 2
0 . 48 0 . 160 30 . 1
2
30 . 1
=
+

=
+
y
s
f h b
bh
A in
2

and 0.11 < A
s
< 0.60


3.0 times the thickness = (3.0)(48.0) = 144.0 in, or 18.0 in
12.0 inches for walls greater than 18 inch thick.

Use #6 @ 12 inches for horizontal temperature and shrinkage reinforcement in
the stem.

54

Development of
Reinforcement
[5.11.2]

[5.11.2.1.1]

[5.11.2.1.3]

The vertical reinforcing must be developed on each side of the critical section
for its full development length.


( ) ( ) ( )
in
f
f A
c
y b
7 . 31
5 . 3
60 79 . 0 25 . 1
'
25 . 1
=

=

b
f
y
= 0.4(1.00)(60) = 24.0 in

Modification Factors that decrease l
d
:

Spacing not less than 6 inches = 0.8


l
d
= (0.8)(0.749)(31.7) = 19.0 in Use 1-9 minimum

Adequate development length is available to embed straight bars into the
footing. However, hook bars per usual practice for ease of construction where
the hooked bars can be set on top of the bottom matt of reinforcing.

55

Diagonal Shear
[5.8]

[3.4.1]

[5.8.2.9]

[C5.8.2.9-1]

[5.8.3.4.1]

[5.8.3.4.2]

[5.8.3.4.2-5]

The diagonal tension shear may be determined a distance d
v
from the face of
the support. For simplicity determine the factored shear at the face. If the
section does not have adequate shear resistance the calculation should be
refined to use the factored shear a distance d
v
from the support.


Pinned Abutment
V
u
= 1.50(7.81) + 1.75(0.91 + 1.49) = 15.92 k/ft

Expansion Abutment
V
u
= 1.50(7.81) + 1.75(1.49) + 3.32 = 17.64 k/ft <= Critical

The value for d
v

d
v
= d
e
a / 2 = 45.50 2.27 /2 = 44.37 in Critical
d
v
= 0.9d
e
= (0.9)(45.50) = 40.95 in
d
v
= 0.72h = (0.72)(48.00) = 34.56 in

Based on the above, the shear depth, d
v
, equals 44.37 inches.

Design Procedure

Three methods are available to determine shear resistance. Since none of the
criteria required to use the simplified procedure is satisfied, this simplified
method may not be used. The second method described in the General
Procedure does not require minimum transverse reinforcement and will be
used.

Determine Crack Width

Shear reinforcing is typically not used in a stem wall. For shear design with
less than minimum transverse reinforcing the maximum expected crack width
must be determined.

in
a
s s
g
x xe
80
63 . 0
38 . 1
+
=

a
g
= maximum aggregate size = inches.

s
x
= d
v
for members without uniformly spaced reinforcing throughout the
depth, where the primary reinforcing is lumped in one location as in
the case for the stem design.
56

[5.8.3.4.2-4]

( ) in s
xe
37 . 44
63 . 0 75 . 0
38 . 1
37 . 44 =
+
=

Calculate strain,
s

The strain in nonprestressed longitudinal tension reinforcement may be
determined by the following formula when
s
is positive.

(
(
(
(
+
+ +
=
ps p s s
po ps p u u
v
u
s
A E A E
f A V V N
d
M
5 . 0

where:

A
ps
= area of prestressing steel on the flexural tension side of the member.
A
ps
= 0 in
2

A
s
= area of nonprestressed steel on the flexural tension side of the
member.
A
s
= 1.35 in
2
.

f
po
= 0 ksi

N
u
= factored axial force taken as positive if tensile. This load is only
used for permanent loads that will always be present. This value can
be conservatively ignored for compressive loads as is done in this
example.
N
u
= 0 kips

V
u
= factored shear force.
V
u
= 17.64 kips

V
p
= 0 kips

M
u
= factored moment but not to be taken less than V
u
d
v
.
M
u
= 201.97 ft-k > (17.64)(44.37) / 12 = 65.22 ft-k

57

[5.8.3.4.2-2]

[5.8.3.4.2-3]

[5.8.3.3-3]

[5.8.3.3-1]

[5.8.3.3-2]

[5.8.2.4-1]

[5.8.2.1-2]
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
(
(
(
(
+
+ +
=
0 35 . 1 29000
0 0 64 . 17 0 5 . 0
37 . 44
12 97 . 201
s

s
= 0.00185

Prior to the 2008 Interim Revisions, the General Procedure for shear design
was iterative and required the use of tables for the evaluation of and . With
the 2008 Revisions, this design procedure was modified to be non-iterative and
algebraic equations were introduced for the evaluation of and . When
sections do not contain at least the minimum amount of shear reinforcement:

( ) ( )
xe s
s + +
=
39
51
750 1
8 . 4

( ) ( ) ( )
23 . 1
37 . 44 39
51
00185 . 0 750 1
8 . 4
=
+ +
=

( ) ( ) 5 . 35 00185 . 0 3500 29 3500 29 = + = + =
s
degrees

Calculate Concrete Shear Strength, V
c

The nominal shear resistance from concrete, V
c
, is calculated as follows:

v v c c
d b f V ' 0316 . 0 =

( ) ( ) ( ) 72 . 38 37 . 44 00 . 12 5 . 3 23 . 1 0316 . 0 = =
c
V k/ft


V
n1
= V
c
+ V
s
+ V
p
= [38.72 + 0 + 0] = 38.72 k/ft

V
n2
= 0.25f
c
b
v
d
v
+ V
p
= 0.25(3.5)(12.00)(44.37) + 0 = 465.89 k/ft

Except for slabs, footings and culverts, transverse reinforcing shall be provided
where ( )
p c u
V V V + > 5 . 0 . Since the stem may be treated as a slab, this
equation need not be satisfied.

V
r
= V
n
= (0.90)(38.72) = 34.85 k/ft > V
u
= 17.64 k/ft

Therefore, the section is adequate for shear without transverse reinforcement.
58
Interface Shear
[5.8.4]

[5.8.4.1-4]

[5.8.4.1-5]

[5.8.4.3]

[5.8.4.1-3]

[5.8.4.1-1]
[5.8.4.1-2]

Minimum
Reinforcement
[5.8.4.4-1]

Interface shear transfer shall be considered across a given plane at an interface
between two concretes cast at different times such as the construction joint at
the base of the stem.

The factored load was determined above to be V
u
= 17.64 k/ft.

The nominal shear resistance, V
ni
used in the design shall not be greater than
the lesser of:

V
ni
K
1
f
c
A
cv
, or

V
ni
K
2
A
cv

Where A
cv
= area of concrete considered to be engaged in interface shear
transfer.

For concrete placed against a clean concrete surface, free of laitance with
surface intentionally roughened to an amplitude of 0.25 inch:

c = 0.24 ksi
= 1.0
K
1
= 0.25
K
2
= 1.5 ksi

The nominal shear resistance of the interface plans shall be taken as:

V
ni
= cA
cv
+ (A
vf
f
y
+ P
c
)

V
ni
= (0.24)(12)(44.37) + 1.0(1.35)(60 + 0) = 208.79 k/ft

But not greater than the lesser of:

V
ni
= (0.25)(3.5)(12.0)(44.37) = 465.89 k/ft

V
ni
= (1.5)(12.0)(44.37) = 798.66 k/ft

V
ri
= V
ni
= (0.90)(208.79) = 187.91 k/ft V
ui
= 17.64 k/ft

The minimum area of interface shear reinforcement shall satisfy:

( ) ( ) ( )
44 . 0
60
37 . 44 0 . 12 050 . 0 05 . 0
=

=
y
cv
vf
f
A
A in
2

Since #8 at 7 inches is provided across the interface, the criteria is satisfied.

59
TOE DESIGN

[3.4.1]
[C3.4.1]

Footing Design

The major loads to be used in the footing design were determined for the
stability analysis. For the footing design, loads and moments are reduced to a
one-foot wide strip analysis.

Load Combinations

A discussion on load factors is in order since an understanding of this issue is
critical to proper design of footings. A brief summary of key items discussed
in the Specification follows.

The load factors shall be selected to produce the total extreme factored force
effect. For each load combination both positive and negative extremes shall be
investigated. In load combinations where one force effect decreases another
effect, the minimum value shall be applied to the load reducing the force
effect. For permanent force effects the load factor that produces the more
critical combination shall be selected from Table 3.4.1-4 since the actual
magnitude of permanent loads may be less than the nominal value. It is
unnecessary to assume that one type of load varies by span, length or
component within a bridge. For example, when investigating uplift at a
bearing in a continuous beam, it would not be appropriate to use the maximum
load factor for permanent loads in spans that produce a negative reaction and a
minimum load factor in spans that produce a positive reaction. For each force
effect, both extreme combinations may need to be investigated by applying
either the high or the low load factor as appropriate. The algebraic sums of
these products are the total force effects for which the bridge and its
components should be designed.

From the previous results of this example, Strength I Limit State using
maximum load factors for the expansion abutment produces the maximum soil
stress in the toe. Since a single load factor should be used for each load type
the toe, heel and stem should all have the same factor. Use of a maximum load
factor for the DC and EV loads produces the maximum soil pressure but also
produces the maximum resisting moment and shear since the overburden soil
and footing toe resist the soil pressure. Use of a minimum load factor for the
DC and EV loads reduces soil pressure but produces the minimum resisting
moment or shear. Whether a maximum or minimum load factor produces the
maximum moment and shear is not obvious, resulting in the need to analyze
each possible combination of maximum and minimum load factors for all the
loads.

This problem does not exist when considering the effects of Service I Limit
State since all critical loads have a load factor of 1.0.

60

Toe Design

A simplified method of analysis that is used in this example is to determine
maximum moments and shears for the toe of a footing based on use of load
factors that produce the maximum soil pressure and minimum resisting loads
even when those different load factors are used for the same component. This
method is neither consistent nor in strict adherence with the LRFD
Specification but is conservative and eliminates the need for multiple
combinations. For the toe design in this example, minimum load factors are
used for the opposing forces from the overburden and footing self- weight. A
more rigorous analysis that includes consistent use of load factors for all
possible combinations is always acceptable and should be used when the
simplified method becomes too conservative.

A summary of dimensions in feet for the footing toe and loads is shown below.

Figure 19

61

Strength I
Limit State
[3.4.1]

Flexural
Resistance
[5.7.3.2]

[5.7.3.1.1-4]

[5.7.2.1]

[5.7.2.2]

Unlike settlement and bearing resistance checks where the average uniform
bearing stress is determined, for the design of structural elements a triangular
or trapezoidal shaped soil stress distribution is assumed. This assumption will
provide the maximum moments and shears in the footing.

P
max
= 4659 / 49.52 = 94.08 k/ft

M
long
= 11044 / 49.52 = 223.02 ft-k/ft

e
long
= 223.02 / 94.08 = 2.370 ft

q
max
= P/B(1 + 6e / B) = [94.08/16][1 + 6(2.370) / 16] = 11.106 ksf
q
min
= P/B(1 - 6e / B) = [94.08/16][1 - 6(2.370) / 16] = 0.654 ksf

q
toe
= 0.654 + (11.106 - 0.654)(10.50) / 16 = 7.513 ksf
q
d
= 0.654 + (11.106 - 0.654)(16.00 - 2.37) / 16 = 9.558 ksf

Strict adherence to LRFD Specifications would require that the same load
factors used in the determination for the soil stress would also be used for
determining shears and moments requiring several combinations of maximum
and minimum load factors to be studied. The simplified method is
demonstrated below.

DC Moment = 0.90[0.15(3.50)(5.50)](2.75) = 7.15 ft-k/ft
EV Moment = 1.00[0.12(3.00)(5.50)](2.75) = 5.45 ft-k/ft

M
u
= 7.513(5.50)
2
2 + (11.106 - 7.513)(5.50)
2
3 7.15 5.45 = 137.26 ft-k/ft

If the maximum load factors were used the moment would decrease by
(7.15)(1.25) / 0.90 + (5.45)(1.35) / 1.00 - 7.15 5.45 = 4.69 ft-k/ft or less than
4 percent of the total.

Try #8 @ 8 inches

A
s
= (0.79)(12 / 8) = 1.185 in
2
/ft
d
s
= 42.00 3.00 clear 1.00 / 2 = 38.50 in

( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
343 . 2
12 85 . 0 5 . 3 85 . 0
60 185 . 1
' 85 . 0
1
=

= =
b f
f A
c
c
y s
in
061 . 0
50 . 38
343 . 2
= =
s
d
c
< 0.6 Therefore, f
y
may be used in the above equation

( ) 99 . 1 343 . 2 ) 85 . 0 (
1
= = = c a in

62

[C5.7.2.1]

[C5.5.4.2.1-1]
[5.5.4.2.1]

[5.7.3.2.2-1]

Maximum
Reinforcing
[5.7.3.3.1]

Minimum
Reinforcing
[5.7.3.3.2]

[5.4.2.6]

Controlling
Cracking
[5.7.3.4]

[5.7.2.6]


046 . 0 1
343 . 2
50 . 38
003 . 0 1 003 . 0 = |
\
|
= |
\
|
=
c
d
t
t

t
= 0.046 > 0.005, the section is tension-controlled
and the reduction factor = 0.90.

( ) ( ) ( ) 00 . 200 12
2
99 . 1
50 . 38 60 185 . 1 90 . 0 =
(
=
n
M ft-k/ft

Since the factored strength, M
n
= 200.00 ft-k/ft, is greater than the factored
load, M
u
= 137.26 ft-k/ft, the section is adequate for flexural strength.

2005.


( )
3528
6
42 ) 12 (
6
2 2
=
= =
bh
S
c
in
3
/ft

692 . 0 5 . 3 37 . 0 ' 37 . 0 = = =
c r
f f ksi


1.2M
cr
= 1.2(0.692)(3528)12 = 244.14 ft-k/ft
1.33Mu = 1.33(137.26) = 182.56 ft-k/ft <= Critical

n
= 200.00 ft-k/ft > 182.56 ft-k/ft, the



449 . 0 5 . 3 24 . 0 ' 24 . 0 = = =
c r
f f ksi

0.80 f
r
= (0.80)(0.449) = 0.359 ksi

63

The Service I Limit State applies with the pinned abutment critical. The
pinned abutment controls because the longitudinal forces are transmitted thru
this abutment and the large friction and rotation load from the bearing pads is
not considered for service limit states. The service limit state design moment
follows:

P
s
= 1.0(2177 + 86 + 850) + 1.0(306 + 72) = 3491 k

Pinned Abutment
M
s
= 1.0(1489 + 107 + 4027 3080) + 1.0(382 + 746 + 986)
+ 0.3(634) + 1.0(125) = 4972 ft-k

Expansion Abutment
M
s
= 1.0(1489 + 107 + 4027 3080) + 1.0(382 + 968) + 0.3(256)
+ 1.0(63) = 4033 ft-k

For the pinned abutment:

P
s
= 3491 / 49.52 = 70.50 k/ft
M
s
= 4972 / 49.52 = 100.40 ft-k/ft

e
B
= 100.40 / 70.50 = 1.424 ft

q
max
= 70.50 / 16.00 (1 + 6(1.424) / 16) = 6.759 ksf
q
min
= 70.50 / 16.00 (1 6(1.424) / 16) = 2.053 ksf
q
toe
= 2.053 + (6.759 2.053)(10.50) / 16 = 5.141 ksf

Figure 20 shows the service load soil stress distribution.

Figure 20

64

Shrinkage &
Temperature
Reinforcement
[5.10.8]

Development of
Reinforcement
[5.11.2]

[5.11.2.1.1]

[5.11.2.1.3]

The toe moment is the result of the upward soil pressure reduced by the weight
of the footing and cover soil taken at the face of the abutment stem.

M
s
= 5.141(5.50)
2
2 + (6.759 - 5.141)(5.50)
2
3
[0.15(3.50) + 0.12(3.00)](5.50)
2
2 = 80.69 ft-k/ft

( ) ( )
274 . 0
3528
12 69 . 80
=
= =
c
s
s
S
M
f ksi

Since the service limit stress is less than 80 percent of the modulus of rupture
the crack control criteria need not be applied.


( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
278 . 0
60 0 . 42 0 . 66 2
0 . 42 0 . 66 30 . 1
2
30 . 1
=
+

=
+
y
s
f h b
bh
A in
2

and 0.11 < A
s
< 0.60

3.0 times the thickness = 126 in, or 18.0 in
12.0 inches for walls greater than 18 inch thick

Use #5 @ 12 inches for temperature and shrinkage reinforcement in the toe.

The reinforcing must be developed on each side of the critical section for its
full development length. For the toe design the critical available embedment
length is (5.50)(12) 2.00 clear = 64.00 inches.

( ) ( ) ( )
in
f
f A
c
y b
7 . 31
5 . 3
60 79 . 0 25 . 1
'
25 . 1
=

=

b
f
y
= 0.4(1.00)(60) = 24.0 in

Modification Factors that Decrease l
d
:
Spacing not less than 6 inch = 0.8

l
d
= (0.8)(0.686)(31.7) = 17.4 in

Since the available development length is greater than the required, the
development length criteria is satisfactory.
65
Shear
[5.8]
[5.8.2.9]

[C5.8.2.9-1]

[3.4.1]

[5.8.3.4.1]

[5.8.3.3-3]

[5.8.3.3-1]

[5.8.3.3-2]

[5.8.2.4-1]

[5.8.2.1-2]

The critical shear is located a distance d
v
from the face of the stem.

The value for d
v

d
v
= d
e
a / 2 = 38.50 1.99 / 2 = 37.51 in <= Critical
d
v
= 0.9d
e
= (0.9)(38.50) = 34.65 in
d
v
= 0.72h = (0.72)(42.00) = 30.24 in

The distance from the toe to a distance d
v
from the face of support equals 5.50
37.51 / 12 = 2.37 feet.


V
u
= (2.37)(11.106 + 9.558) / 2 0.90(0.15)(3.50)(2.37)
- 1.00(0.12)(3.00)(2.37) = 22.51 k/ft

Simplified Procedure
For concrete footings in which the distance from the point of zero shear (toe)
to the face of the wall (5.50 feet) is less than 3d
v
= 3(37.51) / 12 = 9.38 feet:

= 2.0

v v c c
d b f V ' 0316 . 0 =
( ) ( ) ( ) 22 . 53 51 . 37 0 . 12 5 . 3 0 . 2 0316 . 0 = =
c
V k/ft

Since the section will be checked as an unreinforced section for shear, V
s
will
be zero.


V
n1
= V
c
+ V
s
= 53.22 k/ft <= Critical

V
n2
= 0.25f
c
b
v
d
v
= (0.25)(3.5)(12.0)(37.51) = 393.86 k/ft

For footings:

V
r
= V
n
= (0.90)(53.22) = 47.90 k/ft > V
u
= 22.51 k/ft

Since the factored shear resistance exceeds the factored load, the shear criteria
is satisfied.

66
HEEL DESIGN

Heel Design

The simplest method for design of the heel is to ignore the soil reaction
producing a very conservative design for both shear and moment. For this
example the effects of the soil stress will be included. The loads that will act
directly on the heel are the self-weight, soil, live load surcharge and the
resisting soil stress. The simplified method discussed for the toe design will be
used for the heel also. The critical group combination for the heel design will
be the load factors producing the minimum axial loads with maximum
eccentricities resulting in the minimum soil pressure. The critical combination
is Strength I with minimum axial load for the expansion abutment.

Figure 21

P
min
= 2809 / 49.52 = 56.72 k/ft
M
long
= 11044 / 49.52 = 223.02 ft-k/ft
e
long
= 223.02 / 56.72 = 3.932 ft

Since the strength limit state eccentricity is greater than one-sixth the footing
width there will be some uplift for a triangular soil stress distribution.

Length of stress region = (8.000 - 3.932)(3) = 12.204 ft
q
max
= [(56.72)(2)] / 12.204 = 9.295 ksf
q
heel
= [(6.500 - 3.800) / (12.204)](9.295) = 2.056 ksf
67
Strength I
Limit State
[3.4.1]

Flexural
Resistance
[5.7.3.2]

[5.7.3.1.1-4]

[5.7.2.1]

[5.7.2.2]

[C5.7.2.1]

[C5.5.4.2.1-1]
[5.5.4.2.1]

[5.7.3.2.2-1]

Maximum
Reinforcing
[5.7.3.3.1]

The location of the critical moment and shear will be at the back face of the
stem.

M
u
= 1.25(0.150)(3.50)(6.50)(3.25) + 1.35(0.120)(21.00)(6.50)(3.25)
+ 1.75(0.120)(2.0)(6.50)(3.25) (2.056)(2.70)
2
6 = 92.10 ft-k/ft

Try #7 @ 10 inches
A
s
= (0.60)(12 / 10) = 0.720 in
2
/ft
d
s
= 42.00 2.00 clear 0.875 / 2 1.00 bottom = 38.56 in

For footings it is common practice to ignore the bottom inch in strength
calculations since this concrete is cast directly on the soil. The varying soil
level and moisture content may affect the strength of the contact layer.

( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
424 . 1
12 85 . 0 5 . 3 85 . 0
60 720 . 0
' 85 . 0
1
=

= =
b f
f A
c
c
y s
in

037 . 0
56 . 38
424 . 1
= =
s
d
c
< 0.6 Therefore, f
y
may be used in above equation

( ) 21 . 1 424 . 1 ) 85 . 0 (
1
= = = c a in


078 . 0 1
424 . 1
56 . 38
003 . 0 1 003 . 0 = |
\
|
= |
\
|
=
c
d
t
t

t
= 0.078 > 0.005, the section is tension-controlled
and the reduction factor = 0.90.

( ) ( ) ( ) 97 . 122 12
2
21 . 1
56 . 38 60 72 . 0 90 . 0 =
(
=
n
M ft-k/ft

n
= 122.97 ft-k/ft, is greater than the factored
load, M
u
= 92.10 ft-k/ft, the section is adequate for flexural resistance.

2005.

68
Minimum
Reinforcement
[5.7.3.3.2]

[5.4.2.6]

Control of Cracking
[5.7.3.4]

[5.4.6.2]

Service I Limit State
[3.4.1]


( )
3528
6
42 ) 12 (
6
2 2
=
= =
bh
S
c
in
3
/ft

692 . 0 5 . 3 37 . 0 ' 37 . 0 = = =
c r
f f ksi


1.2M
cr
= 1.2(0.692)(3528)12 = 244.14 ft-k/ft
1.33M
u
= 1.33(92.10) = 122.49 ft-k/ft

n
= 122.97 ft-k/ft > 122.49 ft-k/ft, the



449 . 0 5 . 3 24 . 0 ' 24 . 0 = = =
c r
f f ksi

0.80 f
r
= (0.80)(0.449) = 0.359 ksi

P
min
= [1.0(2177) + 1.0(850)] / 49.52 = 61.13 k/ft
M
long
= 4972 / 49.52 = 100.40 ft-k/ft
e
long
= 100.40 / 61.13 = 1.642 ft

The heel moment is the result of the weight of the footing, soil on the heel and
the weight of the live load surcharge reduced by the upward soil pressure taken
at the face of the abutment stem.

q
max
= (61.13 / 16.00)(1 + 6(1.642) / 16.00) = 6.173 ksf
q
min
= (61.13 / 16.00)(1 6(1.642) / 16.00) = 1.468 ksf
q
heel
= 1.468 + (6.173 1.468)(6.50) / 16.00 = 3.379 ksf

M
s
= [0.15(3.50) + 0.12(21.00) + 0.12(2.00)](6.50)(3.25)
(1.468)(6.50)(3.25) (3.379 1.468)(6.50)(6.50 / 6) = 24.93 ft-k/ft

( ) ( )
085 . 0
3528
12 93 . 24
=
= =
c
s
s
S
M
f ksi
Since the service limit stress is less than 80 percent of the modulus of rupture
the crack control criteria need not be applied.
69
Shrinkage &
Temperature
Reinforcement
[5.10.8]

Development of
Reinforcement
[5.11.2]

[5.11.2.1.1]

[5.11.2.1.2]

[5.11.2.1.3]


( )
( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )
296 . 0
60 0 . 42 0 . 78 2
0 . 42 0 . 78 30 . 1
2
30 . 1
=
+

=
+
y
s
f h b
bh
A in
2

and 0.11 < A
s
< 0.60


3.0 times the thickness = (3)(42.0) = 126.0 in, or 18.0 in
12.0 inches for walls greater than 18 inch thick

Use #5 @ 12 inches for temperature and shrinkage reinforcement in the heel.

The reinforcing must be developed on each side of the critical section. For the
heel design the critical available embedment length is (6.50)(12) 2.00 clear =
76.00 inches.


( ) ( )
1 . 24
5 . 3
60 60 . 0 25 . 1
'
25 . 1
=

=
c
y b
f
f A
in

b
f
y
= 0.4(0.875)(60) = 21.0 in

Modification Factors that Increase l
d
:

Top bars = 1.40

Modification Factors that Decrease l
d
:

Spacing not to exceed 6 inch = 0.8


l
d
= (24.1)(1.40)(0.8)(0.749) = 20.2 in

Since the available development length is greater than the required, the
development length criteria is satisfied.

70
Shear
[5.8]
Strength I
Limit State
[3.4.1]

[5.8.2.9]

[C5.8.2.9-1]

[5.8.3.4.1]

[5.8.3.3-3]

[5.8.3.3-1]

[5.8.3.3-2]

[5.8.3.4-1]

[5.8.2.1-2]

The critical shear occurs at the back face of the stem.

V
u
= 1.25(0.150)(3.50)(6.50) + 1.35(0.120)(21.00)(6.50)
+ 1.75(0.120)(2.00)(6.50) (2.056)(2.70) / 2 = 26.33 k/ft

The value for d
v

d
v
= d
e
a / 2 = 38.56 1.21 / 2 = 37.96 in <= Critical
d
v
= 0.9d
e
= (0.9)(38.56) = 34.70 in
d
v
= 0.72h = (0.72)(42.00) = 30.24 in

Simplified Procedure
For concrete footings in which the distance from the point of zero shear (heel)
to the face of the stem (6.50 feet) is less than 3d
v
= 3(37.96) / 12 = 9.49 feet,
the simplified procedure for shear may be used.

= 2.0

Concrete Strength

v v c c
d b f V ' 0316 . 0 =

( ) ( ) ( ) 86 . 53 96 . 37 0 . 12 5 . 3 0 . 2 0316 . 0 = =
c
V k/ft

Since the heel will be checked as an unreinforced section for shear, V
s
will be
zero.


V
n1
= V
c
+ V
s
= 53.86 k/ft

V
n2
= 0.25f
c
b
v
d
v
= (0.25)(3.5)(12.0)(37.96) = 398.58 k/ft

For footings:

V
r
= V
n
= (0.90)(53.86) = 48.47 k/ft > V
u
= 26.33 k/ft

Since the factored shear resistance is greater than the factored load, the section
is adequate for shear.

71

Figure 22

Appendix A Example 2 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Appendix A Example 2 1

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Appendix A Example 2 1

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

LRFD Substructure Example 1 Full Height Abutment on Spread Footing

You might also like