Intellectual Property Rights I KSLU Notes Final
Intellectual Property Rights I KSLU Notes Final
Intellectual Property Rights I KSLU Notes Final
PROPERTY RIGHTS-I
3 AND 5 YEARS LLB UNDER KARNATAKA STATE LAW
UNIVERSITY
By
ANIL KUMAR K T
Mob: 9584416446
Karnataka State law University 3 and 5 Years LLB.
Intellectual Property Rights-I
Most important questions (Pattern of 10 and 6 marks)
Note: These questions are applicable for 16 marks pattern also
1. What are the factors responsible for the growth of patent law explain?
2. What is a specification? Explain its kinds along with legal requisites for
its submission?
3. Write a note on surrender of patent.
4. Define mark. Explain essentials of trade mark?
5. What are the grounds on which the registration of trade mark may be
refused? Examine.
6. Write a note on collective mark.
7. Briefly discuss the salient features of geographical indications of goods
(Registration and protection act) 1999.
8. Explain the procedure of registration of geographical indications.
9. Explain Internet policy of Government of India.
10.Write a note on Copyright in micro software.
11.Briefly discuss the salient features of information technology act 2000.
12.Write a note on data protection in cyberspace
13.Explain salient features of patent co-operation treaty?
14.Write a note on international registration of mark.
15.Explain the Functions of WIPO.
16.Write a note on coordination committee of WIPO.
17.Examine contours of different intellectual property rights.
18.Define an Invention. Describe the yardsticks’ that determine the
patentability of an invention?
19.How do you appreciate ‘Law passing -off’?
20.Examine in detail the procedure for the registration of a geographical
indications of goods (Registration and protection) Act, 1999.
21.Describe the provisions of information technology act 2000, dealing with
cybercrime.
22.Explain the scope and objectives of patent cooperation treaty?
23.Explain the grounds for revocation of patent.
24.Write a note on Transfer of patent rights.
25.Write a note on Trade Libel.
26.Write a note on intellectual property and economic development.
27.Discuss the Economic and labour justification of protection of
intellectual property rights.
28.What is patentable invention? State those categories of inventions
which are not patentable?
29.Define patent? Explain the procedure for applying and granting of
patents?
30.Explain the grounds for refusal of registration of a trade mark.
31.Write a note on well-known trade mark.
32.Write a note on software privacy.
33.Explain the salient features of trade marks act 1999.
34.Discuss the salient features of Madrid convention?
35.Which act constitute infringement patent? Explain the remedies
available for infringement.
36.Define Cybercrime? Explain the different categories of Cybercrime.
37.Paris convention guarantees the protection of intellectual property
discuss.
38.Intellectual property is a valuable asset which may be exploited in a
number of ways explain?
39.What are the rights and obligations of patentee?
40.What are the powers and functions of the controller under information
technology act 2000?
41.Elucidate the grounds available for refusal of registration of trade mark.
BY
ANIL KUMAR K T LLB COACH
1)What is a Specification? Explain its kinds along with legal requisites for its
submission?
Patent specifications must be drafted carefully from both legal and technical
perspective. If the document does not sufficiently disclose the means to
recreate the invention, the owner of the patent stands the risk of losing the
grant. Similarly, if the scope of the invention is not defined accurately, it allows
competitors to circumvent the patent and benefit from it. Therefore, one
needs to draft technically sound patent specifications with due care.
Types of Specifications
Now that the demarcation between the provisional and complete patent
specification is clear, this section of the article explains the elements of the
latter and how they should be drafted.
▪ Claim(s): To say the least, claims section is the most critical part of a
patent application. This is because the patentability of an invention
is determined by them. Claims clearly lay out the scope of the
invention for which protection is sought. Claims should cover
important aspects of the invention, such as novelty. This section
should be written in a manner to provide the broadest possible
coverage and protection for the invention, while remaining novel
and non-obvious in light of the existing technologies or art.
Introduction:
A “Trade mark” [TM] is defined under Section 2(zb) of the Indian Trademarks
Act, 1999 as “mark capable of being represented graphically and which is
capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one person from those of
others and may include a shape of goods, their packaging, and combination of
colors.”
4)What are the grounds on which the registration of trade mark may refused?
Examine.
Introduction:
Section 61 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 prescribes the special provisions for
collective trademarks. The provisions of the Trade Mark Act, 1999 are applicable
to collective marks but they are subject to provisions under Chapter VIII of the
Act.4 Under section 2(1)(zb) of the Act the “trademark” for the goods/services
of one person are distinguished from those of others, whereas in the case of
“collective marks” the “goods/services of members of an association of persons
which is the proprietor of the mark” is distinguished from others.5
A collective mark shall not be registered:6
• the proprietor or the authorised user has caused the collective mark
to mislead the public through the manner in which it has been used
by them;
• the proprietor has not complied with the regulations that govern the
use of the mark.
The first step is to verify whether the geographical indication comes within the
domain of the definition of Gl under section 2(1)(e).
• The application must have the signature of the applicant or his agent
and it should be accompanied by the complete statement of case.
• Three certified copies about the map concerning the region to which the
geographical indication relates.
• Give complete details on all the applicants together with the address. If
there are a huge number of producers then a combined reference can
be made in the application to all the producers of the G.I and the goods
if registered shall be indicated accordingly in the register.
• The applicant is bound to remedy the same within one month of the
communication of deficiency with this regard.
• The Registrar has got the power to withdraw any application, after giving
a reasonable opportunity of being heard if it is accepted in error.
• Any person interested in opposing the registration can file the notice of
opposition within three months which can be further extended by
another one month on request but it has to be filed before the
completion of three months while opposing the GI application that is
published in the Journal.
• The registrar shall send and provide a copy of the notice to the
applicant.
• The applicant shall within two months send a copy of the counter
statement.
• If he is not able to do this, then it shall be deemed that he has
abandoned his application. Where the counter-statement is filed, the
registrar shall send a copy on the every person giving the notice of
opposition.
STEP 7: Registration
• The registrar shall send a Certificate with the seal of the Geographical
indications registry to the applicant.
The Act provides for additional protection for the notified goods.
Any person aggrieved by the decision or order shall prefer and file an appeal to
the intellectual property appellate board (IPAB) within three months.
7.Briefly discuss the salient Features of the Information Technology Act, 2000
According to Section 1 (2), the Act extends to the entire country, which also
includes Jammu and Kashmir. In order to include Jammu and Kashmir, the Act
uses Article 253 of the constitution. Further, it does not take citizenship into
account and provides extra-territorial jurisdiction.
Section 1 (2) along with Section 75, specifies that the Act is applicable to any
offence or contravention committed outside India as well. If the conduct of
person constituting the offence involves a computer or a computerized system
or network located in India, then irrespective of his/her nationality, the person is
punishable under the Act.
Non-Applicability
According to Section 1 (4) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Act is not
applicable to the following documents:
• Passwords;
• Financial information such as bank account or credit or debit card or
other payment instrument details;
• Sexual orientation;
• Medical records and history; and
• Biometric information.
Under section 72A of the Information Technology Act, 2000[4], disclosure of
information, knowingly and intentionally, without the consent of the person
concerned and in breach of the lawful contract has been also made punishable
with imprisonment for a term extending to three years and fine extending to Rs
5,00,000.
PCT application can also be directly filed to RO (receiving office) office of WIPO.
The check is conducted by the receiving office, it is divided into two parts. The
first part concerns the requirements of according an international filing date as
set out in Article 11(1) of PCT. The second part concerns the formal and physical
requirements under Article 14.
{ Prior art: everything which has been made available to the public anywhere in
the world by means of written document which is capable of being of providing
assistance in determining that the claimed invention is new or not and also that
it does or does not involve an inventive step.}
After submitting the necessary document user application is published, after the
completion of 18 months. Before that an application is kept secret. International
Bureau (IB) of WIPO publishes the PCT application. Content of application is
disclosed to the general public.
Introduction:
If the trademark application is found fit, then the mark is recorded in the
International Register and published in the World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO) Gazette of International Marks. The International Bureau
then provides a certificate of international registration and notifies each of the
country contracting to the Madrid Protocol for which protection has been
requested by the trademark applicant. Each of the countries trademark office
has the right to refuse protection of the mark by notifying to the International
Bureau within the time limits specified in the Madrid Protocol. The
Madrid Protocol has set strict time limits of 12 or 18 months for objections to
be raised by the designated offices.
Introduction:
According to Section 2(j) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970 an invention means "a
new product or process involving an inventive step and capable of industrial
application.", such invention protected under the patent law refers to
patented.
2. Novelty:
Novelty is an important criterion in determining patentability of an invention.
novelty or new invention is defined under Section 2(l) of the Patents Act as
"any invention or technology which has not been anticipated by publication in
any document or used in the country or elsewhere in the world before the
date of filing of patent application with complete specification, i.e., the subject
matter has not fallen in public domain or that it does not form part of the state
of the art".
Simply put, the novelty requirement basically states that an invention should
never have been published in the public domain. It must be new with no same
or similar prior arts.
Introduction:
Passing off is a common law tort, which can be used to enforce unregistered
trademark rights. The law of passing off prevents one person from
misrepresenting his goods or services as that of another.
The concept of passing off has undergone changes in the course of time. At
first it was restricted to the representation of one person's goods as those of
another. Later it was extended to business and services. Subsequently it was
further extended to professions and non-trading activities. Today it is applied
to many forms of unfair trading and unfair competition where the activities of
one person cause damage or injury to the goodwill associated with the
activities of another person or group of persons.
The basic question in this tort turns upon whether the defendants' conduct is
such as to tend to mislead the public to believe that the defendants' business is
the plaintiff's or to cause confusion between the business activities of the two.
The tort of passing off is sufficiently wide to give relief to charities engaged in
trading type activities.
Modern Elements of Passing off - In the case Erven Warnink Vs. Townend 3 ,
Lord Diplock gave the essential modern characteristics of a passing off action.
They are as follows: -
1. Misrepresentation
2. Made by a person in the course of trade
3. To prospective customers of his or ultimate consumers of goods or services
supplied by him.
4. Which is calculated to injure the business or goodwill of another trader.
Introduction:
The following table shows the offence and penalties against all the mentioned
sections of the I.T. Act −
Introduction:
Objectives,
To benefit from the PCT system the applicant must be national or resident of
one of the PCT Contracting States
Scope:
• A single application in single language filed in a single country called the
international application.
• Provides a strong basis for patenting decisions to the users.
• Harmonizes formal requirements.
• Used by the world’s major corporations, universities and research
institutions when they seek international patent protection.
• This single application has the effect of filing simultaneously in different
countries (designated countries).
• Protects applicant from certain inadvertent errors.
• Evolves to meet user needs.
Scope.
International Phase
International search
National Phase
Introduction:
Trade libel is defined as the publication of a false statement of fact that is an
intentional disparagement of the quality of the services or products of the
plaintiff’s business and that result in pecuniary damages to the plaintiff. It
constitutes a business tort and allows the injured party to seek both
compensatory damages and punitive damages. (The reader is advised to read
the article on Torts, Negligent and Intentional for a background discussion of
torts in general and punitive damages in particular.)
Clearly normal competition is not only allowed but encouraged in the United
States and efforts to restrict competition are themselves, illegal. The difference
between trade libel and allowed competition is the knowing falsity of the
statements made and the intent to use that falsity to achieve economic
advantage.
What Are the Elements of the Cause of Action?:
1. The defendant must have “published” an untrue statement of fact.
“Published” means communicated same or allowed the communication of the
statement to third parties. While there is a great deal of law in slander as to
what constitutes a publication and whether a negligent publication can allow a
cause of action, the courts normally hold that if you intended to publish or if
you reasonably could have expected the communication to be published, you
are liable.
Remember “published” does not mean publishing a written paper or book. It
simply means communicated. If the communication is oral, it is slander. If the
communication is written it is libel. Either one can allow a cause of action.
Thus, if I post in a public place, such as a web page, information that I know
will be examined by others, that is publishing even if I do not expressly tell
people to open that page. Thus, if I write a letter to a governmental agency
thus have it privileged but send a copy of the letter to an addressee who I
know will spread the letter around, that is publishing. Thus if I loudly make
comments about you that I know will be overheard, that is publishing.
3. The defendant must have made the communications knowing they were
false or with reckless disregard of the truth. (Leonardini v Shell Oil Co. (1989)
216 CA3d 547.) Reckless disregard of the truth is determined on a case by case
basis but essentially means that no reasonable person would have considered
the defendant’s fact finding as acceptable practice prior to publishing the
untrue statements. A typical situation is that the defendant claims the product
is unsafe without either testing the product or investigating the claims of lack
of safety in any verifiable manner.
4. The communication must have resulted in pecuniary damage to plaintiff.
Plaintiff must have loss of business or the plaintiff’s business have been
significantly damaged in reputation to the extent that loss of future business
may be proven.
5. The statement must have been more than a statement of opinion. It must be
a statement of fact. Thus, if someone expresses an opinion that your products
are poorly made and possibly unsafe and makes it clear it is an opinion that is
unlikely to be held to be trade libel. Compare two different types of
communications: “In my opinion, the oil is likely to cause harm to your
engine,” versus, “The oil is likely to cause harm to your engine.” The latter, if
untrue, would be trade libel. The former may not be. Published statements of
opinion do not constitute trade libel: they must be statements of fact which
are untrue.
Introduction:
Intellectual Property is that property that is developed by the human mind and
by human intellect. Now intellectual property and rights attached to intellectual
property are becoming very precious and valuable. In India, there are well-
established administrative, statutory, and Judicial frameworks for protecting
IPR. India has to comply with the Agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual
Property Rights (“TRIPS”) by enacting the necessary statutes. Intellectual
Property rights deal with Trademark, Copyrights, Patents, and Geographical
Indications of goods. The law protecting some special species of Intellectual
property rights in India are:
In the Information Age, leaks are frequent. While you can't always guard
against them, you can record your discoveries and innovations as they occur.
If your work is published online and accessible to users, some of those users
may attempt to copy your property. Digital rights management (DRM)
protects your online assets with coding that does any, or multiple, of the
following:
• Limits the number of times or the window of time a user can access your
work
• Restricts the number of devices your work can be accessed with
• Prevents users from editing, saving, or copying your work
• Prohibits sharing, printing, or taking a screenshot of your work
• Watermarks your work to establish ownership
DRM is a type of encryption that limits what a user can do with your protected
work. This option is a common choice for gated online content like:
Guarding a secret requires proactive action, unless you're the only person who
knows the secret. Without adequate security around a trade secret, courts
won't be convinced that the secret was important enough to guard. Use strong
credentials to restrict access to any valuable information, especially relating to
intellectual property.
Introduction:
According to Section 2(j) of the Indian Patents Act, 1970 an invention means "a
new product or process involving an inventive step and capable of industrial
application.", such invention protected under the patent law refers to patented
Introduction:
A patent for an invention is granted by government to the inventor, giving the
inventor the right to stop others, for a limited period, from making, using or
selling the invention without their permission.
• One should register the mark in the home country before the
protection is awarded to the mark internationally
• There is a risk of “Central attack” [2] to the mark
• There is a very short examination period
• There is also a limitation on assignability
for infringement?
Introduction:
The Patents Act, 1970 empowers the patentee to file a suit in case there is an
infringement of his exclusive patent rights. In order to file a suit, the limitation
period as specified under the Limitation Act is 3 years within the infringement
of the patent rights. The burden of proof usually lies on the plaintiff to prove
that there was patent infringement by the defendant but in certain cases, it is at
the discretion of the court to decide the burden of proof. In India, both districts
and the high courts have the power to hear cases related to patent infringement.
However, in case there is a counterclaim for revocation of the patent filed by
the defendant, then only the High Court has the right to hear the case. The
patentee can file the case in the place of his residence or the place where he
carries out his business or where the cause of action arises. Section 48 of the
Indian Patents Act contains the rights of the patentees. It list down the following
activities as the infringement of the patentee’s rights:
1. Using
2. Making
3. Importing
4. Offering for sale
5. Selling the patented process
If the defendant is involved in any of the above-mentioned acts, then he will be
considered liable for infringement of the rights of the patentee. Section 108(1)
of the patents act, 1970 provides for relief to the plaintiff in case his patent rights
have been violated. The remedies available to the patentee are:
Temporary/Interlocutory Injunction
A temporary injunction is invoked by the court at the initial stages of the suit
filed by the plaintiff. This is passed in order to prevent the defendant from
getting further gains by using other patented products. In order to invoke a
temporary injunction, it is important for the patentee to prove that the patent
is valid and has been infringed by the defendant. Also, the subsequent
infringement in his patent rights has caused irreparable loss to him.
Permanent injunction
A permanent injunction is invoked when the case is finally decided by the court.
The interim injunction is transferred to a permanent injunction if the defendant
is found guilty of patent infringement rights. But if the defendant is absolved
from the liability, then the interim injunction stands dissolved and is not
converted into a permanent injunction.
Damages
In case the defendant is proven guilty, the plaintiff is either awarded damages
or an account of profits by the defendant. Damages may not be provided to the
plaintiff in case the defendant pleads ignorance and proves that he had no
reasonable grounds to believe that the said patent existed at the time of
infringement.
The computer may have been used in the execution of a crime or it may be the
target.
2. Cyber Bullying
A form of harassment or bullying inflicted through the use of electronic or
communication devices such as computers, mobile phones, laptops, etc.
3. Cyber Stalking
Cyberstalking is the use of electronic communication by a person to follow a
person, or attempts to contact a person to foster personal interaction
repeatedly despite a clear indication of disinterest by such person; or monitors
the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication commits
the offence of stalking.
4. Cyber Grooming
Cyber Grooming is when a person builds an online relationship with a young
person and tricks or pressures him/ her into doing a sexual act.
6. Online Sextortion
Online Sextortion occurs when someone threatens to distribute private and
sensitive material using an electronic medium if he/ she doesn’t provide
images of a sexual nature, sexual favours, or money.
7. Phishing
Phishing is a type of fraud that involves stealing personal information such as
Customer ID, IPIN, Credit/Debit Card number, Card expiry date, CVV number,
etc. through emails that appear to be from a legitimate source.
8. Vishing
Vishing is an attempt where fraudsters try to seek personal information like
Customer ID, Net Banking password, ATM PIN, OTP, Card expiry date, CVV etc.
through a phone call.
9. Smishing
Smishing is a type of fraud that uses mobile phone text messages to lure
victims into calling back on a fraudulent phone number, visiting fraudulent
websites or downloading malicious content via phone or web.
10. Sexting
Sexting is an act of sending sexually explicit digital images, videos, text
messages, or emails, usually by cell phone.
14. Spamming
Spamming occurs when someone receives an unsolicited commercial message
sent via email, SMS, MMS and any other similar electronic messaging media.
They may try to persuade the recipient to buy a product or service, or visit a
website where he can make purchases, or they may attempt to trick him/ her
into divulging bank account or credit card details.
15. Ransomware
Ransomware is a type of computer malware that encrypts the files, storage
media on communication devices like desktops, Laptops, Mobile phones etc.,
holding data/information as a hostage. The victim is asked to pay the
demanded ransom to get his device decrypts
16. Viruses, Worms, and Trojans
A computer virus is a program written to enter your computer and
damage/alter your files/data and replicate itself.
Worms are malicious programs that make copies of themselves again and
again on the local drive, network shares, etc.
20. Cyber-Squatting
Cyber-Squatting is an act of registering, trafficking in or using a domain name
with an intent to profit from the goodwill of a trademark belonging to someone
else.
25)Intellectual property is a valuable asset which may be exploited in a
number of ways Explain?
Introduction
There is increasing awareness of intellectual property rights, both
commercially (e.g. through the recognition that innovation and design can
create specific demand, influence consumer preference and generate ongoing
product/brand loyalty) and legally (including the ability to secure monopoly
use rights for inventions or unique works, and through registration and
enforcement of statutory rights).
Ownership structure
It is similarly important to get ownership and trading structures ‘right' from
day one. For example, the costs incurred in seeking to recover/preserve key IP
when post-trading disputes arise with business partners (including
opportunistic profiteering) will greatly exceed the set-up costs foregone.
Indeed, proper structures can prevent the motivation for such disputes arising
at all.
Commercial Strategy
The strategy for making commercial gain from IP will vary depending on the
specific circumstances, including:
(a) Exclusivity;
(b) Territory;
(c) Marketing (eg the duty to generate demand/turnover in the territory);
(d) Financial reporting and data availability (including audit rights);
(e) Duration and termination;
(f) IP registration/filing/protection obligations and costs;
(g) Performance obligations;
(h) IP warranties and indemnities (if any);
(i) Quality standards;
(j) Representations to consumers;
(k) Relative contributions to the business model;
Branding
Much has been written about the success of design-led businesses, particularly
in New Zealand where our geographic isolation and exclusion from dominant
global trade blocs increase the importance of product differentiation and
reputation.
International Considerations
There are important differences in the way various countries treat IP, from
recognition of differing rights, to varying registration regimes/requirements.
Various other strategic and cross border issues (commercial and legal) will be
relevant also.
Market Intelligence
A key part of a successful strategy to exploit IP is analysing the intended
market(s), and adopting appropriate structures, product offerings and partner
relationships to succeed.
Right to Surrender
By giving notice in the prescribed manner, the Patentee of a Patent has the right
to surrender a Patent at any time and at his/her own discretion. The
advertisement for such an offer of surrender is required to be done in the
Journal. The publication is done to give an opportunity to the people to oppose
the offer of surrender of the Patentee. This is done when the Patentee
apprehends his/her non-performance of the Patent in the future and upon
which he/she decides to surrender the Patent.
Right to sue for Infringement
The Patentee has the right to sue for Infringement of Patent in District Court has
the jurisdiction to try the suit.
Obligations:
Once a Patent is granted to a Patentee, there are certain Rights and Obligations
of Patentee. The Obligations of Patentee are as follows:
Duty to Disclose
Sec 8 of the Patent Act, 1970[1], accomplishes the obligation to disclose of the
Patentee. Section 8(1) of the Patent Act, 1970, tells that the Patentee has an
obligation to disclose all required data related to the remote uses of
comparative or same invention documented by him/her or through him/her or
through someone by him/her at the time of applying or within 6 months of
applying.
The Patentee of a Patent is required to record an announcement of all the listed
particulars viewing the applications and, in addition to the above, an endeavor
to disclose all the points of interest of any subsequent applications that might
be documented at the future stages.
Section 8(2) of the Patent Act, 1970, puts an obligation on the Patentee to
provide all the data required by the Controller of Patent with regards to the
relating of any remote applications at whatever point demand is made by the
Controller of Patents within a time period of 6 months of such a demand by the
Controller of Patent. The first part of the obligation of Patentee begins when a
man records an application of Patent. On the other hand, the second part begins
after a demand is made by the Controller of Patents under the Patents Act,
1970.
After this process is imitated to and the Patentee of Patent clears every one of
the restrictions and protests raised against his/her invention, if the Controller of
Patent is fulfilled, he/she will grant a Patent to the invention and publishes it in
the Journal, or generally, the Controller rejects such a Patent.
27)What are the powers and functions of the controller under information
technology act 2000?
Section 18 of IT act 2000The Controller may additionally carry out all or any of
the following functions:
5) Specifies the situations below which the Certifying Authority shall conduct
their business;
7) Specifies the format and content of a Digital Signature Certificate and the
important thing;
8) Specifies the layout wherein Certifying Authorities shall keep the bills.
9) Specifies the terms and situations for the appointment of the auditors and
their remuneration.
10) Helps the Certifying Authorities in organizing any digital machine and law of
such gadget.
11) Specifies the way wherein the Certifying Authorities shall address the
subscribers.
12) Resolves any warfare that arises between the Certifying Authorities and the
subscribers;
15) Maintains the database of public keys in a way that it is available to the
general public.
17) Can suspend the license if he isn’t pleased with the validity of the applicant.
28.What are the factors responsible for the growth of patent law explain?
Factors responsible for the growth of patent law
The world patent has been coined from a Latin word patent- meaning open. A
patent is a document issued by government to the inventor granting permission
to exclusively make, use and sell on disclosure of the invention for a definite
period of time. Unlike patents, monopoly existed where inventions were not
disclosed and exclusively sold.
Medicines required for human cure were not easily obtained to the public in
India. The major source of these medicines was from foreign countries. The lack
of indigenous medicines and their huge demand led to very high prices. It was
the external law that influenced the local law. Drug prices in India were amongst
the highest in the world. In 1957, the Indian Government appointed Justice
Rajagopala Ayyangar committee to revise the patent law to comply with the
then, industrial needs. The report suggested for a process patenting so that the
medicines reach even the poor sections of the society. The government vested
the Patents Act in 1970. This revolutionized the economic system in India by
providing the medicine at a low price.
One should review the Patents Act, 1970 and understand how different aspects
of intellectual property were considered at that moment. Section 3, 5 of the
Patents Act, 1970 mentions inventions that are frivolous, obvious, exploiting
commercially to public, immoral, prejudice to human, animal, plant life or health
or to the environment, scientific principles, abstract theories, identified to
possess new use for a known substance, known process, known machine or
known apparatus, aggregation of the properties by admixture and process for
production of such substances, arrangement or re-arrangement or duplication
of known devices, methods of agriculture, horticulture, processes for the
medicinal, surgical, curative, prophylactic or other treatment of human beings,
animals to render them free of disease or to increase their economic value or
that of their products, a mathematical or business method or a computer
programme per se or algorithms, literary, dramatic, musical, artistic work,
cinematographic works, television productions, rule or method of performing
mental act, method of playing game, presentation of information, topography
of integrated circuits, aggregation or duplication of known properties of a
traditional knowledge, atomic energy, claiming substance intended for use, or
capable of being used, as food or as medicine or drug, or substances prepared
or produced by chemical processes are not patentable.
According to Section 1 (2), the Act extends to the entire country, which also
includes Jammu and Kashmir. In order to include Jammu and Kashmir, the Act
uses Article 253 of the constitution. Further, it does not take citizenship into
account and provides extra-territorial jurisdiction.
Section 1 (2) along with Section 75, specifies that the Act is applicable to any
offence or contravention committed outside India as well. If the conduct of
person constituting the offence involves a computer or a computerized system
or network located in India, then irrespective of his/her nationality, the person is
punishable under the Act.
Non-Applicability
According to Section 1 (4) of the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Act is not
applicable to the following documents:
Section 104 of the Patents Act, 1970 states that only IPAB or the High Court
can be approached for revocation as no suit of infringement can be brought
before a court inferior to the District Court having jurisdiction.
If the Central Government find the facts that a granted patent has been
exercising by wrong means and it is mischievous to the State or prejudicial to
the public, the central government has rights in the case to revoke the
concerned patent and such decision is also published in official journal of
patents.
Section 85 reveals provision in the benefit of public. In these cases where the
patentee does not take necessary actions that may help in better distribution
of the product to the public and more profound availability at reasonable
prices. Such revocations of patent are really useful to public.
1. Assignment
2. Licenses
3. Transmission of patent by operation of law
1. Assignment
The term 'assignment' is not defined in the Indian Patents Act. Assignment is
an act by which the patentee assigns whole or part of his patent rights to the
assignee who acquires the right to prevent others from making, using,
exercising or vending the invention. There are three kinds of assignments
• Legal Assignment
• Equitable Assignment
• Mortgage
2. Licenses:
The Patents Act allows a patentee to grant a License by the way of agreement
under section 70 of the Act. A patentee by the way of granting a license may
permit a licensee to make, use, or exercise the invention. A license granted is
not valid unless it is in writing. The license is contract signed by the licensor
and the licensee in writing and the terms agreed upon by them including the
payment of royalties at a rate mentioned for all articles made under the
patent. Licenses are of the following types,
• Voluntary License
• Statutory License(such as compulsory License)
• Exclusive/Limited License
• Express/Implied License
Voluntary licenses:
It is the license given to any other person to make, use and sell the patented
article as agreed upon the terms of license in writing. Since it is a voluntary
license, the Controller and the Central government do not have any role to
play. The terms and conditions of such agreement are mutually agreed upon
by the licensor and licensee. In case of any disagreement, the licensor can
cancel the licensing agreement.
Statutory licenses:
Statutory licenses are granted by central government by empowering a third
party to make/use the patented article without the consent of the patent
holder in view of public interest. Classic example of such statutory licenses is
compulsory licenses. Compulsory licenses are generally defined
as "authorizations permitting a third party to make, use, or sell a patented
invention without the patent owner's consent3.
• Section 11(1) provides that where the public is likely to get confused
on account of a mark being identical or similar to an earlier
trademark and a subsequent mark for certain goods/services is
identical or similar to the goods/services represented by an earlier
mark, such a mark shall not be registered. Therefore, if the
subsequent mark is associated with the public to an earlier mark it is
likely that such similarity between the marks is sufficient to cause
confusion and thus bring it within the scope of Section 11(1).
However, where the goods/services are identical there is no need to
prove confusion. But the similarity between an earlier and a
subsequent trademark and where the goods/services are similar or
identical the likelihood of confusion must be proved.
In Toshiba Appliances Co. v Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba6 the applicant’s mark
‘TOSIBA’ which was applied for registration had a close resemblance to the
opponent’s trademark ‘TOSHIBA’ which was used in respect of electronic goods.
This resemblance in the two marks was likely to confuse or deceive the users.
The court in the instant case held that the applicant’s mark ‘TOSHIBA’ was
deceptively similar to the opponent’s mark ‘TOSHIBA’. There was a phonetic
similarity between the two marks.
There are certain essential principles which must be kept in mind while
comparing trademarks that are likely to confuse or deceive the users viz.:
Conclusion
The advancement of technologies and the growth of Internet can be argued as
the reason for the growth of software piracy in the world. The protection against
such act of offence for owner and for the users has become important objective
of every government around the world. The director of World Intellectual
Property Organisation stated that in order to meet the needs of the society with
the encouragement of creativity the country while implementing law has to
draw balance between availability of work for society and dignified economic
benefits for the creator/owner of the software to encourage the creativity
thereby encouraging the technological advancement and digitalisation and
economic benefits attributed to such advancements.
Collective Marks
Collective mark, a new concept brought into the Act makes it possible for any
“Association” to get registration for its mark. Collective Mark is a trademark
or service mark used, or intended to be used by the members of an
association, indicating their membership in such Association. The Association
is the owner of the mark and the members are the authorized users. For
example, the Advertising Club of India can register its name and logo as
collective marks and prohibit non- members from using or associating with the
mark.
Single Register
The system of maintaining registration of trademarks in part A and part B is
omitted. Only a single register will be maintained hereafter, thereby giving no
room for discrimination between applicants, as was done formerly. All
applicants are now given equal rights and opportunities.
Conclusion
On the whole the Trademarks Act, 1999 has removed the inconvenient
provisions of the old Act and has fostered the rights of the traders and other
service providers significantly. It also sends a warning to infringers. Surely, the
New Act caters to the developments in trading and commercial practices,
increasing globalization of trade and industry, the need to encourage
investment flows and transfers of technology, need for simplification and
harmonization of trademark management systems and gives effect to
important judicial decisions. This legislation has been much awaited by the
legal as well as the business community. At last the long lingering desire has
been satiated.
The substantive provisions of the Convention fall into three main categories:
national treatment, right of priority, common rules.
(1) Under the provisions on national treatment, the Convention provides that,
as regards the protection of industrial property, each Contracting State must
grant the same protection to nationals of other Contracting States that it
grants to its own nationals. Nationals of non-Contracting States are also
entitled to national treatment under the Convention if they are domiciled or
have a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in a
Contracting State.
(2) The Convention provides for the right of priority in the case of patents (and
utility models where they exist), marks and industrial designs. This right means
that, on the basis of a regular first application filed in one of the Contracting
States, the applicant may, within a certain period of time (12 months for
patents and utility models; 6 months for industrial designs and marks), apply
for protection in any of the other Contracting States. These subsequent
applications will be regarded as if they had been filed on the same day as the
first application. In other words, they will have priority (hence the expression
"right of priority") over applications filed by others during the said period of
time for the same invention, utility model, mark or industrial design.
Moreover, these subsequent applications, being based on the first application,
will not be affected by any event that takes place in the interval, such as the
publication of an invention or the sale of articles bearing a mark or
incorporating an industrial design. One of the great practical advantages of this
provision is that applicants seeking protection in several countries are not
required to present all of their applications at the same time but have 6 or 12
months to decide in which countries they wish to seek protection, and to
organize with due care the steps necessary for securing protection.
(3) The Convention lays down a few common rules that all Contracting States
must follow. The most important are:
(a) Patents. Patents granted in different Contracting States for the same
invention are independent of each other: the granting of a patent in one
Contracting State does not oblige other Contracting States to grant a patent; a
patent cannot be refused, annulled or terminated in any Contracting State on
the ground that it has been refused or annulled or has terminated in any other
Contracting State.
The inventor has the right to be named as such in the patent.
The grant of a patent may not be refused, and a patent may not be invalidated,
on the ground that the sale of the patented product, or of a product obtained
by means of the patented process, is subject to restrictions or limitations
resulting from the domestic law.
Each Contracting State that takes legislative measures providing for the grant
of compulsory licenses to prevent the abuses which might result from the
exclusive rights conferred by a patent may do so only under certain conditions.
A compulsory license (a license not granted by the owner of the patent but by
a public authority of the State concerned), based on failure to work or
insufficient working of the patented invention, may only be granted pursuant
to a request filed after three years from the grant of the patent or four years
from the filing date of the patent application, and it must be refused if the
patentee gives legitimate reasons to justify this inaction. Furthermore,
forfeiture of a patent may not be provided for, except in cases where the grant
of a compulsory license would not have been sufficient to prevent the abuse.
In the latter case, proceedings for forfeiture of a patent may be instituted, but
only after the expiration of two years from the grant of the first compulsory
license.
(b) Marks. The Paris Convention does not regulate the conditions for the filing
and registration of marks which are determined in each Contracting State by
domestic law. Consequently, no application for the registration of a mark filed
by a national of a Contracting State may be refused, nor may a registration be
invalidated, on the ground that filing, registration or renewal has not been
effected in the country of origin. The registration of a mark obtained in one
Contracting State is independent of its possible registration in any other
country, including the country of origin; consequently, the lapse or annulment
of the registration of a mark in one Contracting State will not affect the validity
of the registration in other Contracting States.
Where a mark has been duly registered in the country of origin, it must, on
request, be accepted for filing and protected in its original form in the other
Contracting States. Nevertheless, registration may be refused in well-defined
cases, such as where the mark would infringe the acquired rights of third
parties; where it is devoid of distinctive character; where it is contrary to
morality or public order; or where it is of such a nature as to be liable to
deceive the public.
If, in any Contracting State, the use of a registered mark is compulsory, the
registration cannot be canceled for non-use until after a reasonable period,
and then only if the owner cannot justify this inaction.
Each Contracting State must refuse registration and prohibit the use of marks
that constitute a reproduction, imitation or translation, liable to create
confusion, of a mark used for identical and similar goods and considered by the
competent authority of that State to be well known in that State and to
already belong to a person entitled to the benefits of the Convention.
Each Contracting State must likewise refuse registration and prohibit the use of
marks that consist of or contain, without authorization, armorial
bearings, State emblems and official signs and hallmarks of Contracting States,
provided they have been communicated through the International Bureau of
WIPO. The same provisions apply to armorial bearings, flags, other emblems,
abbreviations and names of certain intergovernmental organizations.
Collective marks must be granted protection.
(c) Industrial Designs. Industrial designs must be protected in each Contracting
State, and protection may not be forfeited on the ground that articles
incorporating the design are not manufactured in that State.
(d) Trade Names. Protection must be granted to trade names in each
Contracting State without there being an obligation to file or register the
names.
(e) Indications of Source. Measures must be taken by each Contracting State
against direct or indirect use of a false indication of the source of goods or the
identity of their producer, manufacturer or trader.
(f) Unfair competition. Each Contracting State must provide for effective
protection against unfair competition.
The Paris Union, established by the Convention, has an Assembly and an
Executive Committee. Every State that is a member of the Union and has
adhered to at least the administrative and final provisions of the Stockholm Act
(1967) is a member of the Assembly. The members of the Executive Committee
are elected from among the members of the Union, except for Switzerland,
which is a member ex officio. The establishment of the biennial program and
budget of the WIPO Secretariat – as far as the Paris Union is concerned – is the
task of its Assembly.
The Paris Convention, concluded in 1883, was revised at Brussels in 1900, at
Washington in 1911, at The Hague in 1925, at London in 1934, at Lisbon in
1958 and at Stockholm in 1967, and was amended in 1979.
BY
ANIL KUMAR K T LLB COACH