0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views10 pages

AS20240325

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 10

REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR

RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C)
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 2

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................3

2.0 Discussion............................................................................................................................3

A: Strategic analysis...............................................................................................................3

B: Stakeholder Engagement Plan...........................................................................................5

i. List of Stakeholders........................................................................................................5

ii. Power and Interest of Stakeholders................................................................................6

C: Elicitation Activity Plan....................................................................................................7

i. Selection of Elicitation Techniques................................................................................7

ii. Customized Examples for Elicitation Activities............................................................8

3.0 Conclusion............................................................................................................................9

Reference List..........................................................................................................................10
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 3

1.0 Introduction
This article explains the essential steps needed to create a Software Requirement
Specification (SRS) for Recycle4Change (R4C)'s revolutionary recycling control system. It
helps to comprehend R4C's functioning domain to succeed in this endeavour. Thus, a
complete strategic analysis needs to consider both R4C's internal capabilities and its external
environment. Diverse involvement of stakeholders and alignment are crucial, emphasising the
requirement to map stakeholder interests and impact thoroughly. Further, stakeholder
participation and alignment are essential as well. This research also examines how to choose
and use customised elicitation methods to capture and change project demands. This
structured inquiry allows the reader to explore strategic viewpoints, stakeholder challenges,
and methodical elicitation accuracy. These elements are necessary for describing the SRS
thoroughly and effectively. Therefore, this plan seeks to explain how to find a dependable
software solution and increase R4C's commitment to environmentally responsible recycling
across a vast network of partners. In particular, the approach is designed to accomplish both
goals.
2.0 Discussion
A: Strategic analysis
Recycle4Change's (R4C) strategic analysis encompasses internal and external
environments to identify the strategic position through a SWOT analysis.
Internal Analysis
Strengths:
1. Social Influence and Employment Endeavours: R4C strives to assist those who
previously served in the legal system to find jobs and guidance. Women and youth will be
addressed to achieve this objective. The strong social entrepreneurship framework R4C
utilises is its foundation. This method makes it simpler for individuals to adjust to their
communities and reduces the number of ex-convicts who re-offend.
2. Operational Efficiency: Automated depots and TOMRA Cleanaway Victoria
(TCV) collaboration for the Victorian Government Container Deposit Scheme (CDS) boost
operating efficiency. Due to its innovative equipment and procedures, R4C can effectively
manage several containers. The incredible productivity of container processing allows us to
achieve these goals (re-collect.com, 2023).
Weaknesses:
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 4

1. Initial Capital and Operational Costs: The startup stage mandates significant asset
in technology, structures, and automobiles. Also, the social business model incurs higher
operational expenses because of its emphasis on engagement and internship for marginalized
groups, potentially affecting sustainability in the financial in the earlier steps.
2. Reliance on Government Contracts and Regulations: R4C's functions are
particularly connected to the Victorian Government's CDS schedule. Any modifications in
legislation, approach, or assurance terms could impact its operational capability and revenue
creeks.
External Analysis
Opportunities:
1. Growing Environmental Awareness: As the public and government contribute more
attention to waste and recycling administration, R4C may broaden its services and play an
important part in the circular economy environment. As society progresses towards long-term
viability CDS involvement could grow, increasing container volumes and R4C's operation.
2. Expansion Potential: The North Geelong and Hoppers Crossing accomplishments
can be developed outside the country. This is because these areas established initial
achievement. If the business is efficient and generates benefits to society, it may attract
government collaborations and funds for development (epa.sa.gov.au, 2023).
Threats:
1. Competitive Pressure: Even though R4C highlights its exclusive deal with TCV,
the recycling and trash management business is very viable. New enterprises or modern
technologies might threaten R4C's market position. Events like these are conceivable.
2. Economic Fluctuations: A drop in the economy or volatility in the economy might
impact government budgets and agency spending, and that could affect environmental
programmes and public CDS engagement.
3. Operational Risks: The activities R4C performs have specific risks due to their
unique nature. Hazards include technical difficulties, supply chain delays, and difficulty
acquiring suitable premises. The company's capacity to achieve contractual and operational
targets may be influenced by the following issues (containersforchange.com.au, 2023).
SWOT Matrix
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 5

Social impact and Initial capital and


employment operational costs
initiatives Dependence on
Operational government
efficiency contracts and
Strong network regulations
and community
engagement
Weaknesses
Strengths (S)
(W)

Opportunitie
Threats (T)
s (O)

Growing Competitive
environmental pressure
awareness
Economic
Expansion fluctuations
potential
Operational risks
Technological
advancements

(Source: Self-created in MS Word)


It indicates that R4C must address its shortcomings and reduce risks to guarantee its
long-term viability and sustainability, even though it is strategically positioned to benefit
from its strengths and opportunities. It must accomplish this to be profitable and sustainable.
B: Stakeholder Engagement Plan
i. List of Stakeholders

No. Stakeholder Type

1 TOMRA Cleanaway Victoria (TCV) External

2 Chance Creators (Parent Organization) External

3 Victorian Government External

4 Customers (Individual, Commercial, Residential) External

5 Employees Internal

6 Suppliers External
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 6

7 Regulatory Authorities External

ii. Power and Interest of Stakeholders

(Source: Self-created in MS Word)


1. TOMRA Cleanaway Victoria (TCV)
Power: High, as they are the agreement party and have considerable leverage over project
determinations.
Interest: High, as the sensation directly impacts the project's importance and business
functions.
2. Chance Creators (Parent Organization)
Power: Moderate, as they deliver support and help to R4C but may not be presently
concerned with day-to-day functions.
Interest: High, as the sensation of R4C, recalls positively on their organisational objectives
and social effect purposes.
3. Victorian Government
Power: High, as they control the receptacle deposit procedure and may have management
over project performance.
Interest: Moderate to high, as the project aligns with their endeavours of environmental and
sustainability.
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 7

4. Customers (Individual, Commercial, Residential)


Power: Variable, pivoting on the size and effect of the consumer. Larger commercial
consumers may have more elevated power.
Interest: Moderate to high, as they are presently affected by the services supplied by R4C and
may have conferred interests in the sustainability of the environment.
5. Employees
Power: Moderate, as they contribute to the daily functions of R4C and may affect internal
operations.
Interest: High, as their livelihoods hinge on the conquest and sustainability of R4C's
functions.
6. Suppliers
Power: They are modest because they provide R4C essential resources and benefits.
Interest: A modest level, as they profit from R4C's performance but may not directly
influence project choices.
7. Regulatory Authorities
Power: High, because they can enforce norms and procedures.
Interest: Moderate to high, because they want R4C to follow regulations and laws
(recycleright.wa.gov.au, 2023).
C: Elicitation Activity Plan
i. Selection of Elicitation Techniques
1. Interviews: Key actors might be interviewed for particular information. R4C may
interview supporters, teammates, and clients to better understand project needs and
expectations.
2. Surveys/Questionnaires: Encouragement of Surveys R4C to collect data from many
stakeholders. This data gathering is helpful. By generating and sending customised surveys to
clients, workers, and members of the community, R4C can learn about their preferences and
requirements.
3. Focus Groups: Focus groups encourage stakeholders to talk about their ideas and
perspectives. R4C may organise focus groups with representatives from several consumer
segments to discuss recycling choices and requirements for service.
4. Prototyping: The initial versions of the software are built during the prototype
phase to collect input and iteratively change application demands. R4C may create recycling
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 8

management system prototypes and test them with a group of users to find usability problems
and improve functionality (Alkhomsan, Baslyman, & Alshayeb, 2024).
ii. Customized Examples for Elicitation Activities
1. Interviews:
Project sponsors, personnel, and consumers obtain specific interview questions from R4C
during preparation. These questions are meant to engage each group. Project managers,
analysts in business, and other key stakeholders are actively involved.
Methods of Session Management, In-person or remote interviews are conducted
systematically to maintain consistency. Interviewers, who are project team members, and
interviewees, who are consumers and sponsors, are project stakeholders.
After analysing the results, R4C analyses interview transcripts to discover recurring problems
and needs. A report summarising the most significant findings and suggestions is being
created for this study. Stakeholders who were involved included project collaborators and
other participants who participated in interviews.
2. Surveys/Questionnaires:
Preparation: R4C creates closed- and open-ended internet surveys utilising survey software.
Key stakeholders include managers of projects, analysts in business, and advertising.
Targeted customers, workers, and community members get email and social media surveys.
Respondents to the survey and the team working on the project.
Outcomes: R4C analyses survey responses for patterns. Presenting survey findings and needs
adjustment suggestions. Survey respondents and project group members.
3. Focus Groups:
R4C organises conversations and sets facilitation standards with clients from different
categories. The facilitators and project managers. A skilled facilitator leads online or in-
person focus groups. Moderators and focus groups. R4C examines focus group declares for
key insights and specifications. Reports consolidate outcomes and clarify priority. The
project team and pay attention groups.
4. Prototyping:
A recycling system for management concepts with primary features and user interfaces is
created by R4C. Those who took part: UX/UI designers, and developers.
Participants test and feedback on the working model. Participants: Testers, UX/UI designers,
and managers of the project.
Conclusion: R4C improves the functional version based on user assessment. Final prototypes
may be modified. Project financiers, consumers, and developers (Görer & Aydemir, 2024).
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 9

3.0 Conclusion
Recycling4Change (R4C) Standards Elicitation Report illustrates strategic analysis,
stakeholder involvement, and elicitation activity plan for recycling management system
design. The Requirements Elicitation Report includes this report. R4C could conduct a
SWOT analysis to identify weaknesses, strengths, possibilities, and threats. This data may
guide decisions regarding strategy. This study may potentially reveal possibilities. The
stakeholder engagement strategy must map stakeholder power and interests. This ensures
project-wide communication and collaboration.
The elicitation plan also includes four ways for gathering information from varied
stakeholders. This includes interviews, surveys, group discussions, and prototypes. It
improves solution quality and decreases risks related to the project. This is because it ensures
that stakeholder needs match R4C aims. A systematic requirements elicitation strategy is
essential for R4C project success. The Responsible Recycling Council (R4C) can create a
responsible recycling management system that meets stakeholders' needs and helps the
organisation meet its environmental and social goals. This objective requires prioritising
stakeholder involvement and using effective elicitation methodologies.
REQUIREMENTS ELICITATION REPORT FOR RECYCLE4CHANGE (R4C) 10

Reference List
Alkhomsan, M. N., Baslyman, M., & Alshayeb, M. (2024). Eliciting and modeling emotional
requirements: a systematic mapping review. PeerJ Computer Science, 10. Retrieved
from: https://peerj.com/articles/cs-1782.pdf
Container deposits | EPA. (n.d.). Www.epa.sa.gov.au.
https://www.epa.sa.gov.au/environmental_info/waste_recycling/container_deposit
Containers for Change | ReCollect Bottle & Can Collection App | Book Today. (n.d.).
ReCollect. Retrieved September 8, 2023, from https://re-collect.com.au/containers-
for-change/
Creating a recycling scheme to keep Queensland beautiful. (2019). CoEx - Container
Exchange. https://www.containersforchange.com.au/
Görer, B., & Aydemir, F. B. (2024). Exploring the REIT architecture for requirements
elicitation interview training with robotic and virtual tutors. Journal of Systems and
Software, 112018. Retrieved from:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016412122400061X
Home. (n.d.). Recycle Right. https://recycleright.wa.gov.au/
Recycle4Change - North Geelong Bottle & Can Depot CDS. (n.d.). Recycle4Change.
https://recycle4change.com.au/

You might also like