Vertical and Horizontal Analysis of The Income Statement

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Vertical and Horizontal Analysis of the Income Statement

To identify the reasons for this decline, we can look at both vertical (percentage of sales) and
horizontal (year-over-year growth) analyses for key income statement items.

1. Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) Impact:

Vertical Analysis:

 In 2005, COGS was 28,597 (81.5% of sales).


 In 2006, COGS was 35,100 (82.4% of sales).

Horizontal Analysis:

 COGS increased by 22.7% from 2005 to 2006, while sales increased by 21.4%.

Impact: The rise in COGS as a percentage of sales indicates that the company’s cost of
production or procurement is growing faster than sales. This narrowing gross margin affects
the EBIT margin because less gross profit is available to cover operating expenses.

2. Salaries and General Administrative Expenses:

Vertical Analysis:

 In 2005, salaries were 2,877 (8.2% of sales).


 In 2006, salaries were 3,578 (8.4% of sales).

Horizontal Analysis:

 Salaries grew by 24.4%, faster than the 21.4% growth in sales.

Impact: The increase in salaries as a percentage of sales indicates that the company’s
operating expenses are rising faster than its revenue. This contributes to the reduction in the
EBIT margin.

3. Other General Expenses (R&D):

Vertical Analysis:

 In 2005, R&D expenses were 222 (0.63% of sales).


 In 2006, R&D expenses were 232 (0.54% of sales).

Horizontal Analysis:

 R&D expenses grew by 4.5%, which is lower than the sales growth rate.

Impact: The relative decrease in R&D expenses as a percentage of sales suggests that this
cost is being managed efficiently and isn’t a major contributor to the declining EBIT margin.

SULZE
R
CONFI
DENTI
AL
Summary of the Causes of Changes in EBIT Margin

The decline in the EBIT margin from 8.08% in 2005 to 7.09% in 2006 is primarily due to:

1. Increasing COGS: The cost of goods sold rose by 22.7%, outpacing sales growth
(21.4%). This increase in production or procurement costs has reduced the gross
margin, leaving less profit available for operating expenses.
2. Higher Operating Expenses: The rise in salaries and general administrative
expenses (up 24.4%) also outpaced the growth in sales, further eroding operating
profits. The company is spending more on salaries and administrative expenses
relative to its sales growth.
3. Stable R&D Expenses: While R&D expenses remained relatively constant as a
percentage of sales, the overall increase in operating expenses, driven by COGS and
salaries, overshadowed any efficiency gains from R&D.

Conclusion

The declining commercial margin (EBIT/Sales) from 2005 to 2006 is mainly due to:

 A faster rise in COGS, reflecting increased production or procurement costs.


 A rise in operating expenses, especially salaries and administrative costs, which
outpaced sales growth.

To improve the EBIT margin, the company should focus on controlling both COGS and
operating expenses relative to sales. This could involve improving operational efficiencies,
renegotiating supplier contracts, or better managing overhead costs.

SULZE
R
CONFI
DENTI
AL

You might also like