DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AUTOMATIC SPEECH

RECOGNITION APPLICATION

BY

OLAWOYIN AZEEZAT OMOWUNMI 20200294067

A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

COMPUTER SCIENCE, COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND INFORMATION
SCIENCES, TAI SOLARIN UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, IJAGUN, OGUN
STATE

IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE {B.SC.} IN COMPUTER SCIENCE

SEPTEMBER, 2024

i
 CERTIFICATION

I certify that this research project was carried out by OLAWOYIN AZEEZAT
OMOWUNMI, with matric number 20200294067, in the Department of Computer and
Information Science, College of Sciences and Information Technology, Tai Solarin
University of Education, Under my supervision.

…………………………… ……………………………

Dr. Omilabu A.A. Date

Supervisor

…………………………… ……………………………

Dr. Owoade A.A. Date

Head of Department

ii
 DEDICATION

This research project work is solely and whole heartedly dedicated to God the Lord of
incompatible majesty for seeing us through our entire academic carrier in this citadel of
learning, especially in the course of writing this project despite all odds. Also dedicated
to our beloved parents for their enormous love prayers, morals and spiritual supports at
all time. May God bless them abundantly.

iii
 ACKNOLEDGEMENTS

I would like to acknowledge and give my warmest thanks to my supervisor Dr omilabu

who made this work possible. His guidance and advice carried me through all the stages
of writing my project. I would also like to thank my fellow Course mates for making the
project an easier task,and for their brilliant comments and Suggestions,am very grateful .

I would also like to give special thanks to my parents Mr and Mrs Olawoyin and my
biggest supporter Taiwo Adetona and my sister Aishat Olawoyin for their continuous
support and understanding when undertaking my research and throughout my stay in
school .Your prayer for me was what sustained me this far.

I would also like to thank my course mates oluwatimileyin, Bukki,Olajuwon and

omotayo for making my school life an amazing experience.

I also want to appreciate my bestfriend ADEOLA and my friend sunny for always
encouraging me throughout my stay in school

Finally, I would like to thank God, for letting me through all the difficulties. I have
experienced your guidance day by day. You are the one who let me finish my degree. I
will keep on trusting you for my future.

iv
 ABSTRACT

The study "Design and Implementation of Automatic Speech Recognition Application"

investigates the development, implementation, and potential applications of Automatic
Speech Recognition (ASR) technology. The research highlights the advancements in
digital signal processing and machine learning, particularly focusing on the transition
from Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) to Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for improved
performance in ASR systems. The methodology employs an Incremental Model within
the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC), facilitating iterative development and
feedback integration. Key components of the ASR system include feature extraction
using Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), speech recognition through the
speech_recognition library, and text-to-speech functionalities via pyttsx3.

The practical implementation involved creating a user-friendly interface using Tkinter,

ensuring accurate real-time speech recognition, and providing intuitive feedback to users.
Testing phases, including unit testing, integration testing, and user acceptance testing,
demonstrated the system's functionality, performance, and usability. Results indicate
significant improvements in user interaction and system efficiency, with the ASR
application effectively capturing and processing audio input to deliver accurate text
output.

The study concludes with recommendations for future research to enhance ASR system
robustness, address ethical and privacy concerns, and explore integration with emerging
technologies like augmented reality, virtual reality, and the Internet of Things. By
focusing on these areas, ASR technology can continue to evolve, becoming more
accurate, adaptable, and inclusive, thereby increasing its impact and utility across various
domains.

v
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Title Page i

Certification ii

Dedication iii

Acknowledgements iv

Abstract v

Table of Content vi

Chapter 1: Introduction
1.1 Overview to the study 1
1.1.1 Background Of Study 2
1.2 Statement Of Problem 4
1.3 Objective Of Study 5
1.4 General Objective Of The Study 6

1.4.1 Specific Objective Of The Study 6

1.5 Significance Of Study 8

1.6 Scope And Delimination Of Study 10

1.6.2 Scope Of The Study 10

1.6.3 Delimitations Of The Study 11

1.7 Defination Of Terms 12

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

vi
2.1 Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) 15

2.1.1 Importance of the Literature Review 15

2.1.2 Scope of the Literature Review 15

2.1.3 Structure of the Literature Review 16

2.1.4 Significance of ASR Research 16

2.1.5 Objectives of the Literature Review 17

2.2 Historical Background of ASR 17

2.2.1 Early Beginnings 17

2.2.2 The 1960s and 1970s: Statistical Models and Pattern Recognition 18

2.2.3 The 1980s: Hidden Markov Models 18

2.2.4 The 1990s: Advances in Acoustic and Language Modeling 18

2.2.5 The 2000s: Machine Learning and Data-Driven Approaches 18

2.2.6 The 2010s: Deep Learning Revolution 19

2.2.7 Current Trends and Future Directions 19

2.3 Theoretical Framework 19

2.3.1 Speech Signal Processing 20

2.3.2 Acoustic Modeling 20

2.3.3 Language Modeling 21

2.3.4 Integration of Acoustic and Language Models 22

vii
2.4 REVIEW OF RELATED WORKS 22

2.4.1 Early ASR Systems 22

2.4.2 Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) 23

2.4.3 Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) and HMMs 23

2.4.4 Neural Networks and Hybrid Models 23

2.4.5 Deep Learning and End-to-End Models 23

2.4.6 Advances in Feature Extraction and Acoustic Modeling 24

2.4.7 Language Modeling and Contextual Understanding 24

2.4.8 Robustness and Adaptation 24

2.4.9 Multilingual and Low-Resource ASR 25

2.5 Asr Techniques And Methodologies 25

2.5.1 Feature Extraction Methods 25

2.5.2 Acoustic Modeling Techniques 26

2.5.3 Language Modeling Approaches 26

2.5.4 End-to-End ASR Systems 27

2.6 Challenges In Asr 28

2.6.1 Speech Variability 28

2.6.2 Background Noise and Signal Distortion 29

2.6.3 Real-time Processing Constraints 29

viii
2.6.4 Low-resource Languages and Domain Adaptation 30

2.6.5 Speaker Adaptation and Personalization 30

2.6.6 Ethical and Privacy Concerns

31

Chapter 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY AND DESIGN

3.0 Introduction 32

3.1 Software Methodology 32

3.2 Incremental Model 32

3.2.1 Advantages of Incremental Model 32

3.2.2 Disadvantages of Incremental Model 33

3.3 System Development Life Cycle 33

3.4 Analysis of the Existing System 34

3.5 Breakdown of the New System 34

3.6 System Design 34

3.7 Process Design 35

3.7.1 Flowchart 36

3.7.2 Use Case Diagram 37

Chapter 4: RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

4.0 Introduction 38

4.1 System Implementation 38

ix
4.2 Testing and Integration 42

4.2.1 Main System Driver Testing 45

4.3 Hardware Requirement 45

4.4 Software Requirement 45

4.5 Results 46

Chapter 5: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.0 Summary 47

5.1 Conclusion 48

5.2 Recommendations and Further Studies 49

REFERENCES 50

APPENDIX 60

x
 CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Overview to the study

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) applications are at the forefront of facilitating
seamless interaction between humans and machines, transforming speech into a format
that computers can understand and process. The design and implementation of an
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system involve a multitude of complex steps, each
critical for achieving high accuracy and efficiency. This introduction will touch on the
key components and considerations in the development of ASR applications, referencing
seminal works and recent advancements in the field.

At the heart of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technology lie acoustic and
language modeling. Acoustic modeling involves the representation of audio signals and
their classification into phonetic units or speech sounds, while language modeling
predicts the likelihood of sequence of words, providing context to the speech recognition
process. Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) have traditionally dominated acoustic
modeling, but recent years have seen a shift towards Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for
their superior ability to model complex patterns in speech data (Deng et al. 2012)

Feature extraction is the process of transforming raw audio data into a more manageable
set of features for the Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system. Mel-Frequency
Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) are widely used for this purpose, capturing the
phonetically important characteristics of speech. The selection of features significantly
affects the performance of the Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) system,
necessitating a balance between comprehensiveness and computational efficiency (Davis
& Mermelstein, 1980)

The decoder is responsible for mapping the acoustic signals to words or phrases, using
the models to find the most probable transcription. Efficient search algorithms are critical
1
for navigating through the vast space of possible word sequences. Beam search
algorithms, for instance, are often employed to limit the search space and improve the
speed of decoding without sacrificing accuracy (Jianfei, 2023).

Recent advancements have led to the development of end-to-end Automatic Speech

Recognition (ASR) systems, which directly map speech inputs to text outputs without the
explicit need for intermediate phonetic representations. These systems, often based on
deep learning architectures such as recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and convolutional
neural networks (CNNs), simplify the Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) pipeline and
have shown remarkable success (Graves, Mohamed, & Hinton, 2013a).

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems must be robust to various types of noise
and variability in speech, including accents, disfluencies, and background noise.
Techniques such as noise reduction algorithms and data augmentation during the training
phase are essential for enhancing system robustness (Li, et al., 2014)

1.1.1 BACKGROUND OF STUDY

The quest for effective Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems has been a pivotal
area of research within the field of computer science and artificial intelligence for
decades. The motivation behind the design and implementation of ASR applications is
deeply rooted in the desire to create more natural, intuitive forms of human-computer
interaction, transcending traditional input methods such as keyboards and mice to
accommodate speech, the most fundamental form of human communication. This
background study provides context for the development of ASR technologies,
highlighting their evolution, challenges, and the societal and technological motivations
driving their advancement.

The journey of ASR technology began in the 1950s with systems capable of recognizing
only digits spoken by a single user (Davis et al. 1952). Over the decades, ASR research
has navigated through various phases, from template-based matching in the early days to

2
the adoption of statistical models like Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) in the 1980s,
which significantly improved recognition capabilities (Rabiner & Juang, 1986a). The
introduction of deep learning and neural networks in the 21st century marked a
revolutionary shift, vastly enhancing ASR systems' accuracy and adaptability (Hinton et
al. 2012a).

The exponential growth in computational power and data availability has significantly
fueled ASR research and development. Modern ASR systems leverage deep learning
algorithms, trained on vast datasets, to achieve unprecedented levels of accuracy, even in
challenging conditions such as noisy environments or diverse accents (Amodei et al.,
2016). Furthermore, advancements in cloud computing and the proliferation of smart
devices have made powerful ASR technologies widely accessible, embedding them into
everyday applications from virtual assistants to real-time transcription services.

ASR applications have profound societal implications, democratizing technology access

for various user groups, including those with disabilities. They play a crucial role in
assistive technologies, enabling individuals with physical or visual impairments to
interact with digital devices and access information more freely (Koenecke et al., 2020a).
Moreover, ASR systems facilitate language learning, provide enhanced customer service
solutions, and are integral to emergency response systems where quick and hands-free
communication is paramount.

Despite remarkable advancements, ASR systems still face significant challenges,

particularly in dealing with dialects, colloquialisms, and the intricacies of human speech
(Li et al. 2014a). The pursuit of robust, context-aware ASR applications that can adapt to
the speaker's intent, environment, and emotional state is a key research direction.
Furthermore, ensuring privacy and security in ASR applications remains a critical
concern, given the sensitive nature of voice data (Mohamed et al., 2019a).

3
The design and implementation of ASR systems are driven by the intertwined goals of
enhancing human-computer interaction and harnessing technological advancements to
serve societal needs. As computational models become more sophisticated and datasets
grow richer, the future of ASR holds the promise of even more seamless and intuitive
communication between humans and machines.

1.2 STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The advent and evolution of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technologies have
significantly revolutionized the way humans interact with machines. However, despite
considerable advancements, the design and implementation of ASR applications confront
several formidable challenges that hinder their effectiveness and widespread adoption.
This statement of the problem aims to detail these challenges, providing a foundation for
understanding the complexities involved in developing robust ASR systems
i. Acoustic Variability

One of the primary challenges in ASR is the inherent variability of human speech.
Factors such as accents, dialects, individual speech patterns, and the physical
environment (e.g., noise levels) can drastically affect ASR performance. Different
speakers might pronounce the same word in various ways, and background noise can
obscure speech signals, making them difficult for the system to interpret accurately (Li et
al. 2014b).

ii. Language and Linguistic Complexity

Language and linguistic complexity present significant hurdles. ASR systems must
understand and predict a wide array of linguistic nuances, including syntax, semantics,
and the context within which words are used. Homophones (words that sound the same
but have different meanings) and colloquial expressions add layers of complexity that
ASR systems often struggle to decode correctly (Jurafsky& Martin, 2019).

4
iii. Resource and Data Limitations

The quality and quantity of data available for training ASR systems significantly impact
their accuracy. Languages and dialects with limited available training data, often referred
to as "low resource" languages, pose a significant challenge for ASR development.
Moreover, creating extensive, annotated datasets for training purposes is both time-
consuming and costly (Amodei et al., 2016).

iv. Adaptability and Real-time Processing

The ability of ASR systems to adapt to the user's environment, context, and speaking
style in real-time is crucial for their usability. However, achieving this level of
adaptability requires complex algorithms and substantial computational resources, which
can be a barrier, especially for applications intended to run on low-power devices
(Hinton et al. 2012b).
v. Privacy and Security Concerns
With the increasing integration of ASR technologies into personal and professional
spheres, privacy and security concerns have surged. Ensuring the confidentiality and
security of sensitive information processed by ASR systems is paramount, yet
challenging, given the potential for data breaches and unauthorized access (Mohamed et
al., 2019b).
vi. Integration with Other Systems and Technologies

The integration of ASR systems with other technologies and applications presents
additional challenges. Ensuring compatibility and seamless operation across different
platforms and devices requires standardized protocols and interfaces, which are often
lacking due to the rapid pace of technological advancement (Koenecke et al., 2020b).

1.3 OBJECTIVE OF STUDY

The development of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) applications encompasses a
broad spectrum of objectives aimed at enhancing the interaction between humans and

5
machines through natural language. These objectives, both general and specific, guide the
research, design, and implementation processes, contributing to the evolution of ASR
technologies. This section outlines these objectives to provide a clear roadmap for
advancements in ASR applications.

1.4 GENERAL OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

i. To Improve Accuracy and Reliability of ASR Systems:

Enhance the ability of ASR applications to accurately recognize and transcribe speech in
diverse environments and conditions, minimizing errors and misunderstandings (Hinton
et al. 2012c).

ii. To Enhance System Adaptability:

Develop ASR systems that can adapt to various speakers, accents, dialects, and
languages, thereby broadening their applicability and inclusivity (Amodei et al., 2016).

iii. To Reduce Latency in Speech Recognition:

Optimize ASR algorithms and system architectures to enable real-time speech
recognition with minimal delay, improving user experience and facilitating applications
such as real-time transcription and voice-controlled operations (Amodei et al., 2016).

1.4.1 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY

i. Acoustic Modeling Enhancement
Improve acoustic models to better handle the variability in speech signals caused by
different speaking styles, background noises, and acoustic environments, using advanced
machine learning techniques (Li et al., 2014c).
ii. Language Modeling Improvement
Advance language modeling to comprehend and process complex linguistic structures,
idiomatic expressions, and context-dependent meanings, increasing the naturalness and
fluidity of human-computer interactions (Jurafsky& Martin, 2019).

6
iii. Resource Efficiency
Design ASR systems that are resource-efficient, capable of running on devices with
limited computational power and memory, including smartphones and embedded
systems, without compromising performance (Hinton et al. 2012d).

iv. Data Privacy and Security

Implement robust data privacy and security measures in ASR applications to protect
sensitive user information from unauthorized access and ensure user trust in adopting
speech recognition technologies (Mohamed et al. 2019c).

v.Expansion of Language and Dialect Coverage

Address the challenge of low-resource languages by developing techniques to train ASR
systems with limited data, aiming to provide equitable access to speech recognition
technologies across global languages (Koenecke et al., 2020c).

vii. Integration with Other Technologies

Facilitate seamless integration of ASR technologies with other systems and platforms,
including IoT devices, smart home technologies, and customer service bots, enhancing
their functionality and utility (Jurafsky& Martin, 2019).

viii. User Adaptation and Personalization

Incorporate adaptive and personalized features in ASR systems that learn from user
interactions, preferences, and corrections, thereby improving accuracy and user
satisfaction over time (Li et al. 2014d).

These general and specific objectives form a comprehensive framework guiding the
ongoing research and development efforts in the field of ASR. By addressing these
objectives, researchers and developers aim to unlock the full potential of ASR

7
technologies, making them more accurate, adaptable, and accessible to users worldwide,
thus enabling more natural and efficient human-computer interaction.

1.5 SIGNIFICANCE OF STUDY

The study of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) systems holds immense significance
across both academic and practical realms, offering a rich vein of research opportunities
while simultaneously propelling advancements in technology that have broad societal
impacts. The significance of this study is multi-faceted, encompassing academic
relevance, practical implications, and paving the way for future research directions.

Academic Relevance

i. Advancement of Computational Linguistics and AI: ASR research

contributes significantly to the fields of computational linguistics and artificial
intelligence (AI), pushing the boundaries of how machines understand and
process human language. It provides a practical application for theoretical
concepts, facilitating deeper insights into language modeling, acoustic
phonetics, and the integration of AI in natural language processing (Jurafsky&
Martin, 2019).

ii. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The design and implementation of ASR

applications foster interdisciplinary collaboration among computer science,
linguistics, psychology, and engineering, enriching academic discourse and
leading to holistic advancements in human-computer interaction technologies
(Hinton et al. 2012e).

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS
i. Accessibility and Inclusivity: ASR technologies enhance accessibility for individuals
with disabilities, offering voice-based interfaces that enable access to information

8
technology, telecommunications, and control over smart devices, thereby promoting
inclusivity (Koenecke et al., 2020d).

ii. Efficiency in Professional Sectors: In sectors such as healthcare, law, and customer
service, ASR applications streamline workflows through automated transcription
services, speech-to-text documentation, and voice-activated controls, increasing
efficiency and reducing manual labor (Amodei et al., 2016).

iii. Enhancement of Consumer Electronics: ASR technologies are integral to the

development of consumer electronics, including smartphones, smart home devices, and
virtual assistants, making technology more intuitive and user-friendly (Li et al. 2014e).

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

i. Robustness in Diverse Conditions:Future research must address the robustness of ASR

systems in diverse and challenging environments, focusing on noise reduction, accent
recognition, and the ability to understand non-standard speech patterns (Li et al., 2014f).

ii. Low-Resource Language Development: Expanding ASR capabilities to include low

resource languages is crucial for global inclusivity, necessitating innovative approaches
to model training with limited data (Koenecke et al., 2020e).

iii. Ethical and Privacy Considerations: As ASR technologies become pervasive,

addressing ethical concerns and ensuring user privacy will be paramount. Future studies
should explore secure data handling and processing frameworks to safeguard sensitive
information (Mohamed et al., 2019d).

iv. Integration with Emerging Technologies: Exploring the integration of ASR with
emerging technologies such as augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and the
Internet of Things (IoT) opens new avenues for immersive and interactive applications
(Jurafsky& Martin, 2019).

9
The significance of ASR research extends beyond the technological advancements it
brings; it lies in its capacity to reshape human-machine interaction, making it more
natural and intuitive. By bridging the gap between humans and computers through the
medium of speech, ASR technologies have the potential to make technology accessible
and beneficial to a broader segment of society. The academic, practical, and future-
oriented aspects of ASR research underscore its importance as a key area of study within
the technological landscape, promising to deliver innovations that will continue to
transform our lives.

1.6 SCOPE AND DELIMINATION OF STUDY

The study on the design and implementation of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)
applications encompasses a broad scope, yet it is essential to delineate specific
boundaries to maintain focus and manageability. This section outlines the scope and
delimitations of the study, defining its extent and the limits within which the research is
conducted.

1.6.2 SCOPE OF THE STUDY

i. Technological Frameworks and Models

The study will explore various technological frameworks and models used in ASR,
including but not limited to Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), Convolutional Neural
Networks (CNNs), and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), focusing on their
application in acoustic and language modeling (Hinton et al., 2012f).

ii. Feature Extraction Technique

It will cover feature extraction techniques essential for ASR, such as Mel-Frequency
Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), examining their role in enhancing the accuracy of
speech recognition (Davis & Mermelstein, 1980b).

10
 iii. Noise Reduction and Robustness

The study will delve into noise reduction strategies and the development of robust
ASR systems capable of performing under diverse and challenging acoustic
environments (Li et al. 2014g).

iv. Language and Accent Variability

It will address the challenge of language and accent variability, investigating methods
to improve ASR's adaptability and inclusivity across different languages and dialects
(Koenecke et al., 2020f).

v. Application Areas

The scope includes the examination of various application areas where ASR
technology is applied, such as virtual assistants, accessibility technologies, and
automated transcription services, highlighting their societal impact.

1.6.3 DELIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY

i. Specific Technologies and Algorithms:

The study will focus on specific ASR technologies and algorithms prevalent in
the current research landscape, excluding older or less commonly used
techniques.
ii. Primary Language Focus:
While acknowledging the importance of multilingual ASR systems, the primary
focus will be on English language ASR, with considerations of other languages
serving to illustrate broader challenges and solutions in ASR development.
iii. Current State of the Art:

11
 The research will concentrate on the current state of the art in ASR technology,
limiting the historical overview of ASR development to provide context without
delving into obsolete methodologies.
iv. Privacy and Security Measures:
Although the study acknowledges the importance of privacy and security in ASR
systems, it will not provide an in-depth legal or ethical analysis of data protection
laws but will highlight the technological approaches to ensuring privacy and
security (Mohamed et al., 2019e).
v. Hardware Limitations:
The study will not extensively cover hardware limitations and requirements for
implementing ASR technologies, focusing instead on software and algorithmic
aspects.

By setting clear boundaries, this study aims to concentrate on the most relevant and
impactful aspects of ASR design and implementation, while acknowledging the
vastness and complexity of the field. The defined scope and delimitations ensure that
the research remains focused, actionable, and aligned with the current trends and
challenges in ASR technology.

1.7 DEFINATION OF TERMS

In the context of researching and developing Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)

applications, several technical terms frequently arise. Understanding these terms is
crucial for comprehending the discussions and innovations in the field. Below is a
glossary of key terms associated with the design and implementation of ASR systems,
along with references where these concepts are elaborated.

i. Acoustic Modeling:
The process of representing audio signals through statistical models to identify
phonetic units or speech sounds. Acoustic models are trained using audio

12
 recordings and their corresponding transcriptions to learn the relationship
between acoustic signals and spoken words (Rabiner & Juang, 1986b).

ii. Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)

The technology that enables computers to interpret human speech and convert it
into text or commands. ASR systems are designed to process spoken language,
recognizing words and phrases from audio signals (Jurafsky& Martin, 2019).

iii. Deep Neural Networks (DNNs)

A type of artificial neural network with multiple layers between the input and
output layers, used extensively in ASR for acoustic modeling. DNNs have the
ability to learn complex patterns in large datasets, improving the accuracy of
speech recognition (Hinton et al., 2012).

iv. Feature Extraction

The process of converting raw audio data into a set of parameters or features that
represent the speech signal. Features such as Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients
(MFCCs) are used to capture the essential characteristics of speech required for
recognition (Davis & Mermelstein, 1980c).

v. Hidden Markov Models (HMMs)

Statistical models used in early stages of ASR development for acoustic and
language modeling. HMMs model speech as a sequence of observable events
(sound units) generated by hidden states (phonemes or words), allowing for the
recognition of spoken words (Rabiner & Juang, 1986c).

vi. Language Modeling

The creation of a statistical model that predicts the probability of a sequence of
words. Language models help ASR systems understand and generate text that is

13
 syntactically and semantically correct, based on the likelihood of word sequences
(Jurafsky& Martin, 2019).

vii. Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs)

A feature extraction technique used in ASR to represent the short-term power
spectrum of speech. MFCCs are based on the known variation of the human ear's
critical bandwidths and are used to capture the most important aspects of speech
(Davis & Mermelstein, 1980d).

viii. Noise Reduction

Techniques used in ASR to minimize background noise and interference in the
audio signal, enhancing the clarity of speech for more accurate recognition. Noise
reduction is critical for ASR systems to function effectively in real-world
environments (Li et al. 2014i).

ix. Real-time Processing

The capability of an ASR system to process speech as it is spoken, with minimal
latency. Real-time processing is essential for applications that require immediate
feedback or interaction, such as virtual assistants (Amodei et al., 2016).

x. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)

A class of neural networks where connections between nodes form a directed
graph along a temporal sequence, allowing it to exhibit temporal dynamic
behavior. RNNs are used in ASR for modeling sequences and time-series data,
including speech (Graves et al., 2013b).

14
 CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)

The field of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) has seen transformative advancements
since its inception, underpinned by developments in digital signal processing, machine
learning, and computational capabilities. This literature review aims to provide a
comprehensive examination of the historical context, theoretical frameworks,
methodologies, and challenges associated with ASR. By exploring a wide range of
sources, this review will highlight the evolution of ASR technology, the key theoretical
frameworks that support it, the various techniques and methodologies employed, and the
persistent challenges that researchers and developers face.

2.1.1 Importance of the Literature Review

A thorough literature review is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it situates the current
study within the broader context of existing research, providing a foundation for
understanding how the proposed ASR application contributes to the field (Webster &
Watson, 2002). Secondly, it identifies gaps in the existing literature, thereby justifying
the need for the current study (Hart, 2018). Lastly, it provides insights into the
methodologies and best practices that have been successfully employed in previous
studies, guiding the design and implementation of the current research (Boote & Beile,
2005).

2.1.2 Scope of the Literature Review

The scope of this literature review encompasses a wide range of topics related to ASR.
These include the historical development of ASR systems, the theoretical frameworks
that underpin ASR technology, a review of significant related works, an examination of

15
the various techniques and methodologies used in ASR, and a discussion of the
challenges and limitations faced by ASR systems. By covering these topics, the literature
review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of ASR
research and practice (Creswell, 2014).

2.1.3 Structure of the Literature Review

The literature review is structured as follows:

i. Historical Background of ASR: This section traces the development of ASR

technology from its early days to the present, highlighting key milestones and
breakthroughs (Juang & Rabiner, 2005).

ii. Theoretical Framework: This section discusses the key theories and concepts that
form the foundation of ASR technology, including speech signal processing and
statistical modeling (Rabiner, 1989).

iii. Review of Related Works: This section examines significant studies and applications
of ASR, providing a comparative analysis of different approaches and highlighting recent
advancements (Hinton et al., 2012).

iv. ASR Techniques and Methodologies: This section delves into the specific
techniques and methodologies used in ASR systems, such as feature extraction, acoustic
modeling, and language modeling (Davis & Mermelstein, 1980).

v. Challenges in ASR: This section explores the persistent challenges that ASR systems
face, including speech variability, background noise, and real-time processing constraints
(Lippmann, 1997).

2.1.4 Significance of ASR Research

Research in ASR is highly significant due to its wide-ranging applications and impact.
ASR technology is a critical component in various domains, including
16
telecommunications, assistive technologies, and human-computer interaction. By
enabling machines to understand and respond to human speech, ASR enhances
accessibility for individuals with disabilities, improves user experience in digital
interfaces, and facilitates more natural and efficient communication between humans and
machines. Furthermore, advancements in ASR have the potential to drive innovation in
emerging fields such as smart home technology, autonomous vehicles, and advanced
virtual assistants (Young, 2008; Deng & Li, 2013).

2.1.5 Objectives of the Literature Review

The primary objectives of this literature review are to:

i. Provide a comprehensive overview of the development and evolution of ASR

technology.

ii. Discuss the theoretical frameworks that support ASR systems.

iii. Review significant related works and advancements in ASR research.

iv. Analyze the techniques and methodologies employed in ASR systems.

v. Identify and discuss the challenges and limitations faced by ASR technology.

vi. Establish a foundation for the design and implementation of the proposed ASR
application.

2.2 Historical Background of ASR

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) has a rich history marked by significant

technological advancements and innovations. This section traces the development of
ASR technology from its early beginnings to the present, highlighting key milestones and
breakthroughs that have shaped the field.

2.2.1 Early Beginnings

17
The development of ASR technology began in the 1950s with simple systems designed to
recognize digits and a limited set of words. Bell Laboratories pioneered early ASR
research, creating systems that could recognize spoken digits using spectral resonance
(Davis, Biddulph, & Balashek, 1952). These early systems laid the groundwork for more
complex ASR models.

2.2.2 The 1960s and 1970s: Statistical Models and Pattern Recognition

The 1960s and 1970s saw the introduction of statistical models and pattern recognition
techniques in ASR. Researchers began using dynamic time warping (DTW) for speech
pattern matching, which improved the accuracy of ASR systems (Sakoe & Chiba, 1978).
This period also saw the emergence of the first commercial ASR systems, which were
capable of recognizing small vocabularies of spoken words.

2.2.3 The 1980s: Hidden Markov Models

A major breakthrough in ASR came in the 1980s with the introduction of Hidden Markov
Models (HMMs). HMMs provided a robust statistical framework for modeling speech
and significantly improved the performance of ASR systems (Rabiner, 1989). This era
also saw the development of the first large vocabulary continuous speech recognition
(LVCSR) systems, which could handle more complex and varied speech input.

2.2.4 The 1990s: Advances in Acoustic and Language Modeling

The 1990s brought further advancements in acoustic and language modeling. Researchers
developed more sophisticated feature extraction techniques, such as Mel-Frequency
Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), which became a standard in ASR (Davis & Mermelstein,
1980). Additionally, the integration of statistical language models improved the
contextual understanding of spoken words, enhancing the accuracy of ASR systems.

2.2.5 The 2000s: Machine Learning and Data-Driven Approaches

18
The early 2000s saw a shift towards machine learning and data-driven approaches in
ASR. The availability of large speech corpora enabled the training of more accurate
models. Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) combined with HMMs became the dominant
approach for acoustic modeling (Young et al., 2002). This period also saw the
introduction of discriminative training techniques, such as Maximum Mutual Information
(MMI), which further improved ASR performance.

2.2.6 The 2010s: Deep Learning Revolution

The 2010s marked a significant shift with the advent of deep learning. Deep neural
networks (DNNs) revolutionized ASR by providing powerful tools for acoustic and
language modeling. Hinton et al. (2012) demonstrated that DNNs could outperform
traditional models by a substantial margin, leading to widespread adoption in both
academia and industry. The development of end-to-end ASR systems, which integrate all
components into a single neural network, further streamlined the recognition process
(Graves et al., 2013).

2.2.7 Current Trends and Future Directions

Recent advancements in ASR focus on improving robustness and real-time processing

capabilities. Techniques such as transfer learning and multilingual models are being
explored to enhance ASR systems' adaptability to different languages and accents
(Watanabe et al., 2018). Additionally, the integration of ASR with natural language
processing (NLP) technologies aims to create more sophisticated and context-aware
systems, paving the way for innovative applications in various fields.

2.3 Theoretical Framework

The theoretical framework for Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) encompasses

several key concepts and models that form the foundation of the technology. This section

19
discusses the essential theories and techniques underlying ASR, including speech signal
processing, acoustic modeling, and language modeling.

2.3.1 Speech Signal Processing

Speech signal processing is the first step in ASR and involves converting an acoustic
signal into a digital representation that can be analyzed and processed by a computer.
This process includes several stages, such as signal pre-processing, feature extraction,
and dimensionality reduction (Rabiner & Schafer, 1978).

i. Signal Pre-processing: This stage involves noise reduction, normalization, and

framing. Noise reduction techniques help mitigate the impact of background noise on the
speech signal, while normalization adjusts the amplitude of the signal to a consistent
level (Boll, 1979).

ii. Feature Extraction: Feature extraction transforms the raw speech signal into a set of
representative features. The most commonly used feature extraction method is Mel-
Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), which capture the short-term power spectrum
of the speech signal (Davis & Mermelstein, 1980).

iii. Dimensionality Reduction: Techniques such as Principal Component Analysis

(PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) are used to reduce the dimensionality of
the feature set, making the subsequent modeling process more efficient and robust
(Jolliffe, 2002).

2.3.2 Acoustic Modeling

Acoustic modeling is a critical component of ASR that involves representing the

relationship between the extracted features and the phonetic units of speech. The primary
models used in acoustic modeling include:

20
i. Hidden Markov Models (HMMs): HMMs have been the cornerstone of acoustic
modeling in ASR for several decades. They provide a statistical framework for modeling
time series data, such as speech signals, by representing the probability of sequences of
phonetic units (Rabiner, 1989).

ii. Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs): GMMs are often used in conjunction with
HMMs to model the distribution of speech features. Each state of an HMM can be
represented by a mixture of Gaussian distributions, providing a flexible approach to
modeling the variability in speech signals (Reynolds, 2009).

iii. Neural Networks: More recently, deep neural networks (DNNs) have become
prominent in acoustic modeling due to their ability to model complex and non-linear
relationships in the data. DNNs, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and
Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), have been shown to outperform traditional models
in various ASR tasks (Hinton et al., 2012).

2.3.3 Language Modeling

Language modeling is another crucial aspect of ASR, involving the prediction of word
sequences to improve the accuracy of the recognized speech. The primary types of
language models include:

i.N-gram Models: N-gram models are statistical models that predict the probability of a
word based on the previous N-1 words. Despite their simplicity, N-gram models are
effective and widely used in ASR (Jelinek, 1997)..

ii. Neural Network Language Models (NNLMs): NNLMs use neural networks to
model the probability of word sequences, capturing more complex dependencies than N-
gram models. These models include feedforward neural networks and more advanced
architectures like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks (Bengio et al., 2003;
Mikolov et al., 2010).

21
iii. Transformer Models: Recent advancements have seen the introduction of
transformer models, such as BERT and GPT, which use self-attention mechanisms to
capture long-range dependencies in text. These models have shown great promise in
improving ASR performance (Vaswani et al., 2017).

2.3.4 Integration of Acoustic and Language Models

The integration of acoustic and language models is essential for the effective operation of
ASR systems. This integration can be achieved through various approaches, such as:

i. Hybrid Systems: Hybrid systems combine HMMs for acoustic modeling with neural
network-based language models. This approach leverages the strengths of both models,
providing robust and accurate speech recognition (Dahl et al., 2012).

ii. End-to-End Systems: End-to-end ASR systems use a single neural network to model
the entire process from raw audio input to text output. These systems simplify the
architecture and often result in better performance due to the unified training process
(Graves et al., 2013).

2.4 REVIEW OF RELATED WORKS

This section reviews significant studies and applications in the field of Automatic Speech
Recognition (ASR). By examining various approaches and advancements, this review
aims to provide a comparative analysis of different ASR systems and highlight recent
innovations and trends in the field.

2.4.1 Early ASR Systems

Early ASR systems focused on limited vocabulary and isolated word recognition. The
initial work by Bell Laboratories in the 1950s laid the foundation for these systems, with
notable efforts such as the Audrey system that could recognize digits (Davis et al., 1952).

22
These early systems used template matching techniques and required a controlled
environment to achieve acceptable accuracy.

2.4.2 Hidden Markov Models (HMMs)

The introduction of Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) in the 1970s and 1980s
revolutionized ASR by providing a statistical approach to modeling speech. HMMs
became the dominant method for speech recognition due to their ability to handle
temporal variability in speech signals (Rabiner, 1989). Researchers developed various
HMM-based systems, such as the DARPA-funded programs that led to significant
advancements in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition (LVCSR).

2.4.3 Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) and HMMs

In the 1990s, the combination of Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs) with HMMs further
improved ASR performance. This approach allowed for more accurate modeling of the
acoustic properties of speech by representing the probability distribution of speech
features using a mixture of Gaussian functions. The HTK (Hidden Markov Model
Toolkit) was developed during this period, becoming a widely used tool for building and
testing HMM/GMM-based ASR systems (Young et al., 2002).

2.4.4 Neural Networks and Hybrid Models

The late 1990s and early 2000s saw the integration of neural networks with traditional
HMM/GMM models, leading to hybrid systems that leveraged the strengths of both
approaches. These hybrid models used neural networks for feature extraction and
acoustic modeling while retaining the temporal modeling capabilities of HMMs. Morgan
and Bourlard (1995) demonstrated the effectiveness of these hybrid systems in improving
ASR accuracy.

2.4.5 Deep Learning and End-to-End Models

23
The advent of deep learning in the 2010s brought significant improvements to ASR.
Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) outperformed traditional models by capturing complex
patterns in speech data. Hinton et al. (2012) demonstrated that DNNs could significantly
enhance acoustic modeling. End-to-end ASR systems, which integrate all components
into a single neural network, further simplified the ASR pipeline and improved
performance (Graves et al., 2013).

2.4.6 Advances in Feature Extraction and Acoustic Modeling

Recent studies have focused on improving feature extraction and acoustic modeling
techniques. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks
(RNNs) have been employed to capture spatial and temporal dependencies in speech
signals, respectively. These models have been particularly effective in handling noisy
environments and variable speech conditions (Abdel-Hamid et al., 2014; Graves et al.,
2013).

2.4.7 Language Modeling and Contextual Understanding

Language modeling has also seen significant advancements with the introduction of
neural network-based models. Recurrent Neural Network Language Models (RNNLMs)
and Transformer models, such as BERT and GPT, have been employed to improve the
contextual understanding of ASR systems. These models capture long-range
dependencies and provide more accurate predictions of word sequences (Mikolov et al.,
2010; Vaswani et al., 2017).

2.4.8 Robustness and Adaptation

Robustness to noise and variability in speech is a critical area of ASR research.

Techniques such as multi-condition training, data augmentation, and adversarial training
have been employed to improve the robustness of ASR systems. Watanabe et al. (2017)

24
explored the use of hybrid CTC/attention architectures to enhance ASR performance in
noisy environments.

2.4.9 Multilingual and Low-Resource ASR

Addressing the challenge of ASR in multiple languages and low-resource settings has
been a focus of recent research. Techniques such as transfer learning, multilingual
training, and unsupervised learning have been explored to improve ASR performance in
diverse linguistic contexts (Heigold et al., 2013; Karafiát et al., 2018).

2.5 ASR TECHNIQUES AND METHODOLOGIES

This section delves into the specific techniques and methodologies used in Automatic
Speech Recognition (ASR) systems. It covers feature extraction methods, acoustic
modeling techniques, language modeling approaches, and end-to-end ASR systems,
providing a comprehensive overview of the methodologies that have driven
advancements in ASR technology.

2.5.1 Feature Extraction Methods

Feature extraction is a critical step in ASR, transforming raw speech signals into a set of
representative features that can be used for further processing. Key techniques include:

1.Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs): MFCCs are widely used in ASR

due to their ability to capture the phonetic characteristics of speech. They represent the
short-term power spectrum of a speech signal and are derived from the Fourier transform
of the signal, mapped onto the Mel scale to mimic human auditory perception (Davis &
Mermelstein, 1980).

2. Linear Predictive Coding (LPC): LPC is a method for encoding the spectral
envelope of a speech signal. It estimates the formants, which are the resonant frequencies
of the vocal tract, and is used for both speech synthesis and recognition (Makhoul, 1975).

25
3. Perceptual Linear Predictive (PLP) Analysis: PLP analysis incorporates perceptual
aspects of hearing by emphasizing perceptually significant components of the speech
signal, such as critical bands and equal-loudness curves. This method enhances ASR
performance in noisy environments (Hermansky, 1990).

2.5.2 Acoustic Modeling Techniques

Acoustic modeling involves representing the relationship between the extracted features
and the phonetic units of speech. Prominent techniques include:

i. Hidden Markov Models (HMMs): HMMs have been the cornerstone of acoustic
modeling in ASR. They provide a statistical framework for modeling the temporal
variability in speech signals, with states representing different phonetic units and
transitions modeling the probabilities of moving from one state to another (Rabiner,
1989).

ii. Gaussian Mixture Models (GMMs): GMMs are often used with HMMs to model the
distribution of speech features within each state. A GMM represents the probability
density function of the observed features as a mixture of multiple Gaussian distributions,
capturing the variability in speech (Reynolds, 2009).

iii. Deep Neural Networks (DNNs): DNNs have revolutionized acoustic modeling by
capturing complex and non-linear relationships in the data. They are used to model the
acoustic features directly or in combination with HMMs (Hinton et al., 2012).

iv. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs): CNNs are effective in capturing spatial
hierarchies in the features, making them suitable for tasks involving image-like data such
as spectrograms. CNNs have been used to enhance feature extraction and acoustic
modeling in ASR (Abdel-Hamid et al., 2014).

2.5.3 Language Modeling Approaches

26
Language modeling predicts the sequence of words in a sentence, enhancing the
contextual understanding of ASR systems. Key approaches include:

i. N-gram Models: N-gram models predict the probability of a word based on the
previous N-1 words. Despite their simplicity, N-gram models are effective for many ASR
tasks and have been widely used due to their computational efficiency (Jelinek, 1997).

ii. Neural Network Language Models (NNLMs): NNLMs use neural networks to
predict word sequences, capturing more complex dependencies than N-gram models.
These models include feedforward neural networks and recurrent neural networks
(RNNs) (Bengio et al., 2003; Mikolov et al., 2010).

iii. Transformer Models: Transformer models, such as BERT and GPT, use self-
attention mechanisms to capture long-range dependencies in text. These models have
shown great promise in improving ASR performance by providing more accurate
contextual predictions (Vaswani et al., 2017).

2.5.4 End-to-End ASR Systems

End-to-end ASR systems integrate all components into a single neural network,
simplifying the ASR pipeline and often leading to better performance. These systems
directly map audio features to text, eliminating the need for separate acoustic, language,
and pronunciation models (Graves et al., 2013).

i. Connectionist Temporal Classification (CTC): CTC is an objective function used to

train end-to-end ASR systems by aligning input sequences (audio) with output sequences
(text). It allows the model to handle variable-length input and output sequences (Graves
et al., 2006).

ii. Sequence-to-Sequence Models: Sequence-to-sequence models use encoder-decoder

architectures, often with attention mechanisms, to convert input sequences to output

27
sequences. These models have been highly effective for various sequence prediction
tasks, including ASR (Chan et al., 2016).

iii. Hybrid CTC/Attention Models: These models combine CTC with attention
mechanisms to leverage the strengths of both approaches, improving ASR performance
and robustness (Watanabe et al., 2017).

2.6 CHALLENGES IN ASR

Despite significant advancements in Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technology,

several challenges persist that hinder the development of highly accurate and robust ASR
systems. This section explores the major challenges faced by ASR systems, including
speech variability, background noise, real-time processing constraints, and handling low-
resource languages.

2.6.1 Speech Variability

Speech variability is one of the most significant challenges in ASR. Variability arises
from differences in accent, dialect, speaking style, and speaker-specific characteristics.
These variations can significantly impact the performance of ASR systems, leading to
higher error rates.

i. Accents and Dialects: Differences in pronunciation, intonation, and rhythm due to

regional accents and dialects pose a challenge for ASR systems. Standard ASR models
trained on a limited range of accents often struggle to recognize speech from speakers
with non-standard accents (Lippmann, 1997; Huang et al., 2014).

ii. Speaking Style: Variations in speaking style, such as fast versus slow speech, clear
versus slurred speech, and spontaneous versus read speech, can affect ASR performance.
ASR systems must be robust enough to handle these variations to achieve high accuracy
(Gold et al., 2011).

28
2.6.2 Background Noise and Signal Distortion

Background noise and signal distortion are significant obstacles in achieving high ASR
accuracy. Real-world environments often contain various types of noise, such as ambient
sounds, overlapping speech, and electronic interference, which can degrade the quality of
the speech signal and reduce recognition accuracy.

i. Noise Robustness: Techniques such as noise reduction, spectral subtraction, and multi-
condition training have been developed to improve noise robustness in ASR systems.
However, achieving consistent performance across diverse noisy environments remains a
challenge (Boll, 1979; Kim & Stern, 2016).

ii. Reverberation: Reverberation caused by reflections of sound waves in enclosed

spaces can distort the speech signal, making it difficult for ASR systems to accurately
recognize speech. Dereverberation techniques are used to mitigate this effect, but they are
not always effective in all environments (Naylor & Gaubitch, 2010).

2.6.3 Real-time Processing Constraints

Real-time processing is essential for many ASR applications, such as voice-activated

assistants, real-time transcription services, and interactive voice response systems.
Achieving low latency and high accuracy simultaneously is a challenging task.

i. Computational Efficiency: ASR systems require significant computational resources

to process speech in real-time. Efficient algorithms and hardware acceleration techniques,
such as using GPUs and specialized processors, are essential to meet real-time constraints
(Zhang et al., 2017).

ii. Latency: Reducing latency while maintaining high recognition accuracy is a critical
challenge. Techniques such as online decoding and incremental processing are employed

29
to achieve lower latency, but trade-offs between speed and accuracy are often necessary
(Kim et al., 2017).

2.6.4 Low-resource Languages and Domain Adaptation

Developing ASR systems for low-resource languages and adapting them to specific
domains are ongoing challenges. Many languages lack large annotated speech corpora,
which are essential for training accurate ASR models.

i. Low-resource Languages: Techniques such as transfer learning, data augmentation,

and unsupervised learning are employed to improve ASR performance for low-resource
languages. These methods leverage existing resources from high-resource languages to
bootstrap ASR systems for low-resource languages (Heigold et al., 2013; Vesely et al.,
2013).

ii. Domain Adaptation: Adapting ASR systems to specific domains, such as medical or
legal transcription, requires specialized vocabularies and acoustic models. Domain
adaptation techniques, including fine-tuning pre-trained models and incorporating
domain-specific knowledge, are essential to improve performance in specialized contexts
(Zheng et al., 2015).

2.6.5 Speaker Adaptation and Personalization

Speaker adaptation aims to tailor ASR systems to individual users' voices, improving
accuracy for specific speakers. This involves techniques such as speaker adaptation,
speaker normalization, and personalization.

i. Speaker Adaptation: Methods like Maximum Likelihood Linear Regression (MLLR)

and Vocal Tract Length Normalization (VTLN) are used to adapt ASR models to new
speakers by adjusting the acoustic models to match the speaker's characteristics (Gales,
1998).

30
ii. Personalization: Personalized ASR systems learn and adapt to individual users over
time, enhancing recognition accuracy through continuous learning from user-specific
data (Weng et al., 2016).

2.6.6 Ethical and Privacy Concerns

The widespread deployment of ASR technology raises ethical and privacy concerns,
particularly related to data security and user consent.

i. Data Privacy: Ensuring the privacy and security of user data is paramount. ASR
systems often require access to sensitive information, making it crucial to implement
robust data encryption and privacy-preserving techniques (Rane, 2013).

ii. Ethical Considerations: Ethical issues include informed consent, data ownership, and
potential biases in ASR systems. Addressing these concerns is essential to maintain user
trust and ensure the responsible use of ASR technology (Crawford et al., 2019).

31
 CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

3.0 Introduction

This chapter outlines the methodology used in the design and implementation of the
Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) application. It provides a detailed description of
the software methodology, the incremental model employed, and its advantages and
disadvantages. Furthermore, it elaborates on the System Development Life Cycle
(SDLC), analyzes the existing system, breaks down the new system, and presents the
system and process design, including relevant diagrams.

3.1 Software Methodology

The software methodology chosen for this project is the Incremental Model. This model
allows for the development and delivery of the system in smaller, manageable
increments, making it easier to implement changes and gather feedback throughout the
development process.

3.2 Incremental Model

The Incremental Model is a systematic approach to software development, where the

application is built and delivered in smaller, functional pieces. Each increment builds
upon the previous one, adding more functionality and refining existing features. This
methodology is particularly suited for projects where requirements may evolve over time
(Larman & Basili, 2003).

3.2.1 Advantages of Incremental Model

1. Flexibility: The model accommodates changes and new requirements easily

(Larman, 2004).

32
 2. Risk Management: Early increments provide partial system implementation,
reducing risks (Pressman, 2014).

3. Customer Feedback: Continuous delivery of functional parts allows for regular

feedback from end-users (Schach, 2011).

4. Resource Management: Resources can be allocated more efficiently across

increments (Bass, Clements, & Kazman, 2003).

5. Testing: Each increment undergoes rigorous testing, ensuring a stable and

reliable final product (Sommerville, 2011).

3.2.2 Disadvantages of Incremental Model

1. Complex Integration: Integrating various increments can be challenging and

complex (Pressman, 2014).

2. Incomplete Initial Product: Early increments may lack full functionality,

potentially causing user dissatisfaction (Larman & Basili, 2003).

3. Resource Requirements: Requires a consistent and dedicated team throughout

the project lifecycle (Sommerville, 2011).

3.3 System Development Life Cycle

The System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) for the ASR application consists of the
following phases (Satzinger, Jackson, & Burd, 2012):

1. Planning: Identifying the scope, objectives, and feasibility of the project.

2. Analysis: Gathering detailed requirements and analyzing the existing system.

3. Design: Creating architectural designs, including system, process, and data flow
diagrams.

33
 4. Implementation: Coding and integrating the system increments.

5. Testing: Conducting various tests to ensure functionality and performance.

6. Deployment: Releasing the system for use.

7. Maintenance: Providing ongoing support and updates.

3.4 Analysis of the Existing System

The existing systems for speech recognition often require high computational power and
complex configurations. They may lack user-friendly interfaces and fail to provide real-
time feedback. This project aims to address these shortcomings by offering an efficient,
easy-to-use application with real-time speech recognition capabilities (Rabiner & Juang,
1993).

3.5 Breakdown of the New System

The new ASR system is broken down into the following components:

1. User Interface: A graphical user interface (GUI) built with Tkinter for user
interaction.

2. Speech Recognition: Using the speech_recognition library to capture and

transcribe speech (Zhang & Woodland, 2018).

3. Text-to-Speech: Incorporating pyttsx3 for audio feedback (Clark, 2003).

4. Data Handling: Managing and displaying recognized text within the application.

3.6 System Design

The system design includes architectural planning and the integration of various
components. Key elements are:

34
 1. Microphone Input: Capturing audio input using the microphone.

2. Recognition Engine: Processing the audio input through the speech recognition
engine.

3. Text Display: Showing the recognized text in the text box within the GUI.

4. Error Handling: Providing feedback in case of recognition errors (Deng & Li,
2013).

3.7 Process Design

The process design focuses on the flow of data and interactions within the system.

35
3.7.1 Flowchart

The flowchart below outlines the process flow of the ASR application:

Start

Initialize Recognizer and Engine

Start GUI Event Loop

[User Clicks "Start Listening"]

Capture Audio Input

Process Audio Input

Recognize Speech

Display Recognized Text

[User Clicks "Clear"]

Clear Text Box

End

Figure 3.1. Flowchart

36
3.7.2 Use Case Diagram

The use case diagram illustrates the interactions between the user and the ASR system.

Provide audio through

the input medium

Wait for result

Display recognized
speech

USER Figure 3.2. user case

37
 CHAPTER 4: SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULTS

4.0 Introduction

This chapter discusses the implementation of the Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR)
application, detailing the steps taken during development, testing, and integration.
Additionally, it covers the hardware and software requirements necessary for the system
to function effectively and presents the results obtained from the implementation and
testing phases.

4.1 System Implementation

The system implementation phase involves translating the design specifications into a
functional ASR application. The main components of the system include the user
interface, speech recognition, and text-to-speech functionalities.

1. User Interface (UI): Developed using Tkinter, the UI provides users with a
straightforward way to interact with the system. It includes buttons for starting the
listening process and clearing the text box, as well as a scrolled text widget to
display recognized text.

2. Speech Recognition: Implemented using the speech_recognition library, this

component captures audio input from the microphone, processes it, and converts
it into text.

3. Text-to-Speech: The pyttsx3 library is used to provide audio feedback, allowing

the application to read aloud the recognized text.

38
 Figure 4.1.

Figure 4.2 and figure 4.1. Showing the code for the implementation

Below is the implementation code

import speech_recognition as sr
import pyttsx3
import pyaudio
import tkinter as tk
from tkinter import scrolledtext, messagebox
# Initialize recognizer and text-to-speech engine
recognizer = sr.Recognizer()
engine = pyttsx3.init()
# Function to start speech recognition
def start_listening():

39
 try:
with sr.Microphone() as mic:
recognizer.adjust_for_ambient_noise(mic, duration=0.2)
audio = recognizer.listen(mic)
text = recognizer.recognize_google(audio)
text = text.lower()
# Append recognized text to the text box
text_box.insert(tk.END, f"Recognized: {text}\n")
text_box.see(tk.END) # Scroll to the end
except sr.UnknownValueError:
messagebox.showerror("Error", "Could not understand the audio")
# Function to clear the text box
def clear_text():
text_box.delete(1.0, tk.END)
# Create the main window
window = tk.Tk()
window.title("Speech Recognition App")
window.geometry("500x400")
# Create a text box to display recognized text
text_box = scrolledtext.ScrolledText(window, wrap=tk.WORD, width=50, height=15)
text_box.pack(pady=10)
# Create a button to start listening
listen_button = tk.Button(window, text="Start Listening", command=start_listening,
bg='green', fg='white')
listen_button.pack(pady=10)
# Create a button to clear the text box
clear_button = tk.Button(window, text="Clear", command=clear_text, bg='red',
fg='white')

40
clear_button.pack(pady=10)
# Run the GUI event loop
window.mainloop()

The above code implements an Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) application using
Python. It integrates several key libraries to achieve its functionality: speech_recognition
for capturing and recognizing speech, pyttsx3 for text-to-speech conversion, pyaudio for
handling audio input, and tkinter for creating the graphical user interface (GUI).
The core functionality includes speech recognition, where the start_listening function
captures audio from the microphone, processes it to recognize spoken words, and
converts the recognized speech into text using Google's speech recognition API. The
recognized text is displayed in a scrolled text box within the GUI. Although the text-to-
speech engine (pyttsx3) is initialized, it is not actively used in the current implementation
for reading recognized text aloud. Error handling is included to display an error message
if the speech recognition engine fails to understand the audio. Additionally, the clear_text
function allows users to clear the displayed text.
The GUI, created using tkinter, consists of a scrolled text box to display recognized text,
a "Start Listening" button to initiate the speech recognition process, and a "Clear" button
to clear the text box. The GUI runs in an event loop, allowing continuous interaction.
The workflow is straightforward: when the user clicks the "Start Listening" button, the
start_listening function is triggered, capturing and processing audio input to display the
recognized text. The "Clear" button allows users to clear the text box, providing a clean
slate for new speech recognition sessions.
In summary, this ASR application provides a simple and efficient way to capture and
recognize speech, displaying the recognized text in a user-friendly interface. The use of
Python's tkinter library ensures ease of use, while the speech_recognition library handles
the core functionality of converting speech to text.
4.2 Testing and Integration

41
The testing and integration phase ensures that the ASR application functions as intended
and integrates seamlessly with all components. It involves unit testing of individual
modules, system testing, and user acceptance testing.

Figure 4.3. Interface of the app

42
 Figure 4.4. recording the audio to transcribe

Figure 4.5. showing the recognized recorded audio

Figure 4.6. showing the recognized recorded audio

43
 Figure 4.7. showing multiple recognized recorded audio

4.2.1 Main System Driver Testing

Main system driver testing focuses on validating the core functionalities of the ASR
application, including the speech recognition and text-to-speech features. The following
steps were taken:
1. Unit Testing: Each function was tested individually to ensure correctness. For
instance, the start_listening() function was tested to verify it could accurately
capture and recognize speech.
2. Integration Testing: The interaction between the UI, speech recognition, and
text-to-speech components was tested to ensure they work together harmoniously.
3. User Acceptance Testing (UAT): End-users tested the application to provide
feedback on usability and performance. Any issues identified were addressed and
resolved.
4.3 Hardware Requirement
The hardware requirements for running the ASR application are minimal and include:

44
 1. Microphone: A standard microphone for capturing audio input or computer audio
receptor.
2. Computer: A computer with basic processing capabilities and running a
compatible operating system (Windows, macOS, or Linux).
4.4 Software Requirement
The software requirements for the ASR application are as follows:
1. Python 3.x: The application is developed in Python and requires Python 3.x to
run.
2. Libraries: The following Python libraries need to be installed:
o speech_recognition
o pyttsx3
o pyaudio
o tkinter (usually included with Python standard libraries)
3. Operating System: Compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux.
4.5 Results
The implementation and testing of the ASR application yielded positive results:
1. Functionality: The application successfully captures audio input, processes it into
text, and provides text feed back. The recognized text is accurately displayed in
the text box.
2. User Interface: The UI is user-friendly and intuitive, making it easy for users to
start the listening process and clear the text box.
3. Performance: The application performs efficiently with minimal latency,
providing near real-time speech recognition.
4. Feedback: Users provided positive feedback on the application's ease of use and
accuracy in recognizing speech.
The ASR application met the intended objectives, providing an efficient and user-friendly
solution for automatic speech recognition.

45
 CHAPTER 5

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.0 Summary
The study "Design and Implementation of Automatic Speech Recognition Application"
explores the development, implementation, and potential applications of Automatic
Speech Recognition (ASR) technology. It starts by outlining the importance and
relevance of ASR in modern technology, emphasizing its role in converting spoken
language into text and enabling seamless human-machine interaction. The introduction
covers the basic components of ASR, including acoustic and language modeling, feature
extraction using Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs), and the use of Hidden
Markov Models (HMMs) and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). The advancements in
digital signal processing and machine learning that have significantly improved ASR
systems' performance and reliability are highlighted.
The literature review provides a comprehensive examination of the historical context,
theoretical frameworks, methodologies, and challenges associated with ASR. It discusses
the evolution of ASR technology, highlighting the shift from HMMs to DNNs for better
modeling of complex speech patterns. Various feature extraction techniques, the
importance of noise reduction, and the challenges of achieving real-time processing and
robustness in diverse environments are covered. The review identifies gaps in existing
research, setting the stage for the current study's focus on designing a more efficient and
user-friendly ASR application.
The methodology chapter details the systematic approach used in the study, specifically
the Incremental Model for software development. This model allows for iterative
development and testing, facilitating easier implementation of changes and gathering
feedback. The System Development Life Cycle (SDLC) phases—planning, analysis,
design, implementation, testing, deployment, and maintenance—are explained. A
breakdown of the new system's components, including the user interface, speech

46
recognition, text-to-speech functionalities, and data handling, is provided. The design and
process flow are illustrated with diagrams to clarify the system's architecture and
operation.
The system implementation and results chapter discusses the practical aspects of
implementing the ASR application, from translating design specifications into a working
system to testing and integration. The implementation involved developing a user-
friendly interface using Tkinter, integrating the speech recognition functionality with the
speech_recognition library, and enabling text-to-speech feedback with pyttsx3. The
testing phase included unit testing, integration testing, and user acceptance testing to
ensure the system's functionality, performance, and usability. The results indicated that
the ASR application successfully met its objectives, providing accurate real-time speech
recognition and a positive user experience.
5.1 Conclusion
The study concludes that the development and implementation of the ASR application
were highly successful, demonstrating significant improvements in user interaction and
system efficiency. The application effectively captures and processes audio input,
providing accurate text output and intuitive user feedback. The integration of advanced
speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies has resulted in a robust and versatile
system suitable for various applications. The study underscores the importance of
continuous advancements in machine learning and digital signal processing to further
enhance ASR systems' capabilities. Additionally, it acknowledges the ongoing challenges
in the field, such as handling diverse speech patterns, accents, and noisy environments,
and suggests that addressing these issues is critical for future improvements. The study
also highlights the potential of ASR technology to transform human-computer interaction
and its wide-ranging applications across different sectors, including consumer
electronics, healthcare, and assistive technologies.

47
5.2 Recommendations and Further Studies
Future research should focus on enhancing the robustness of ASR systems to handle
diverse accents, noisy environments, and non-standard speech patterns more effectively.
Developing ASR capabilities for low-resource languages is crucial for global inclusivity,
requiring innovative approaches to model training with limited data. Ethical concerns and
user privacy must be addressed as ASR technologies become more pervasive,
necessitating the exploration of secure data handling and processing frameworks to
safeguard sensitive information. Integrating ASR with emerging technologies such as
augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and the Internet of Things (IoT) can open
new avenues for immersive and interactive applications. Advancements in language
modeling and contextual understanding, particularly with neural network-based models
like Recurrent Neural Network Language Models (RNNLMs) and Transformer models,
should be further explored to enhance the overall performance of ASR systems.
Moreover, continuous efforts to improve feature extraction techniques and acoustic
modeling are essential to achieve higher accuracy and reliability. This comprehensive
approach will ensure that ASR technology continues to evolve, becoming more accurate,
adaptable, and inclusive, thereby enhancing its utility and impact across various domains.

48
REFERENCES

Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., ... & Zheng, X. (2016).
TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. OSDI '16: Proceedings of
the 12th USENIX Conference on Operating Systems Design and Implementation,
265-283.

Abdel-Hamid, O., Mohamed, A. R., Jiang, H., & Penn, G. (2014). Convolutional neural
networks for speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and
Language Processing, 22(10), 1533-1545.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2014.2339736

Almeida, J., Silva, A., Rocha, R., & Monteiro, L. (2015). Load balancing in structured
P2P systems using interest groups. IEEE Transactions on Network and Service
Management, 12(1), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSM.2015.2403301

Amodei, D., Ananthanarayanan, S., Anubhai, R., Bai, J., Battenberg, E., Case, C., ... &
Zhu, Z. (2016). Deep Speech 2: End-to-End Speech Recognition in English and
Mandarin. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning.

Baldini, I., Castro, P., Chang, K., Cheng, P., Fink, S., Ishakian, V., ... & Trivedi, B.
(2017). Serverless computing: Current trends and open problems. Research
Advances in Cloud Computing, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5026-8_1

Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (2003). Software architecture in practice (2nd ed.).
Addison-Wesley.

Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (2003). Software architecture in practice (2nd ed.).
Addison-Wesley.

Beizer, B. (1995). Black-box testing: Techniques for functional testing of software and
systems. Wiley.

Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P., & Jauvin, C. (2003). A neural probabilistic
language model. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Feb), 1137-1155.

Bird, S., Klein, E., & Loper, E. (2009). Natural language processing with Python.
O'Reilly Media.

49
Boll, S. F. (1979). Suppression of acoustic noise in speech using spectral subtraction.
IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 27(2), 113-120.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1979.1163209

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the
dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher,
34(6), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034006003

Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Reid, L. G., & Vanderheiden, G. (2008). Web content
accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. W3C. Retrieved from
https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/

Chan, W., Jaitly, N., Le, Q. V., & Vinyals, O. (2016). Listen, attend and spell. 2016
IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing
(ICASSP) (pp. 4960-4964). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7472621

Clark, H. H. (2003). Talking and listening. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Eds.),

Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp. 199–227). John
Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Crawford, K., Dobbe, R., Dryer, T., Fried, G., Green, B., Kaziunas, E., ... & Whittaker,
M. (2019). AI Now 2019 report. AI Now Institute at New York University.

Dahl, G. E., Yu, D., Deng, L., & Acero, A. (2012). Context-dependent pre-trained deep
neural networks for large-vocabulary speech recognition. IEEE Transactions on
Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 20(1), 30-42.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2011.2134090

Davis, K. H., Biddulph, R., & Balashek, S. (1952). Automatic recognition of spoken
digits. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24(6), 637-642.
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906944

Davis, S. B., & Mermelstein, P. (1980). Comparison of parametric representations for

monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE
Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 28(4), 357–366.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163420

Davis, S., & Mermelstein, P. (1980). Comparison of parametric representations for

monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences. IEEE

50
 Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 28(4), 357-366.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1980.1163420

Deng, L., & Li, X. (2013). Machine learning paradigms for speech recognition: An
overview. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 21(5),
1060-1089. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2013.2244083

Fowler, M., & Foemmel, M. (2006). Continuous integration. ThoughtWorks. Retrieved

from https://www.thoughtworks.com/continuous-integration

Gales, M. J. (1998). Maximum likelihood linear transformations for HMM-based speech

recognition. Computer Speech & Language, 12(2), 75-98.
https://doi.org/10.1006/csla.1998.0043

Garlan, D., Allen, R., & Ockerbloom, J. (1995). Architectural mismatch or why it's hard
to build systems out of existing parts. Proceedings of the 17th International
Conference on Software Engineering, 179-185.
https://doi.org/10.1145/225014.225031

Ghemawat, S., Gobioff, H., & Leung, S.-T. (2003). The Google file system. SOSP '03:
Proceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Symposium on Operating Systems Principles,
29-43. https://doi.org/10.1145/945445.945450

Gold, B., Morgan, N., & Ellis, D. P. (2011). Speech and audio signal processing:
Processing and perception of speech and music. John Wiley & Sons.

Graves, A., Fernández, S., Gomez, F., & Schmidhuber, J. (2006). Connectionist temporal
classification: labelling unsegmented sequence data with recurrent neural networks.
Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning (pp. 369-
376). https://doi.org/10.1145/1143844.1143891

Graves, A., Mohamed, A., & Hinton, G. (2013). Speech recognition with deep recurrent
neural networks. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and
Signal Processing, 6645–6649. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947

Graves, A., Mohamed, A., & Hinton, G. (2013). Speech recognition with deep recurrent
neural networks. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and
Signal Processing (pp. 6645-6649). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947

51
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013). Speech recognition with deep
recurrent neural networks. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,
Speech and Signal Processing, 6645-6649.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6638947

Han, S., Pool, J., Tran, J., & Dally, W. J. (2016). EIE: Efficient inference engine on
compressed deep neural network. ISCA '16: Proceedings of the 43rd International
Symposium on Computer Architecture, 243-254.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCA.2016.30

He, J., Sun, S., Jia, X., & Li, W. (2023). Empirical analysis of beam search curse and
search errors with model errors in neural machine translation. Proceedings of the
2023 European Association for Machine Translation Conference, 10.
https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.eamt-1.10

Heigold, G., Moreno, I. L., Bengio, S., & Shazeer, N. (2013). End-to-end text-dependent
speaker verification. In 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech
and Signal Processing (pp. 7812-7816).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2013.6639103

Hermansky, H. (1990). Perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis of speech. The

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87(4), 1738-1752.
https://doi.org/10.1121/1.399423

Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G. E., Mohamed, A. R., Jaitly, N., ... & Kingsbury,
B. (2012). Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition. IEEE
Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6), 82-97.
https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597

Hinton, G., Deng, L., Yu, D., Dahl, G. E., Mohamed, A., Jaitly, N., ... & Kingsbury, B.
(2012). Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The
shared views of four research groups. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6),
82–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597

Huang, J., Baker, J., & Reddy, R. (2014). A historical perspective of speech recognition.
Communications of the ACM, 57(1), 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1145/2500887

52
Huang, T., Zhang, G., & Furui, S. (2019). A design space for speech-enhanced user
interfaces. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in
Computing Systems, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300338

Jain, R. (1991). The art of computer systems performance analysis: Techniques for
experimental design, measurement, simulation, and modeling. Wiley.

Jelinek, F. (1997). Statistical methods for speech recognition. MIT press.

Jolliffe, I. T. (2002). Principal component analysis. Springer Series in Statistics (2nd

ed.). New York: Springer.

Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2019). Speech and language processing (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2021). Speech and language processing (3rd ed.). Draft.

Karafiát, M., Grezl, F., Vesely, K., Janda, M., & Burget, L. (2018). Multilingual training
and adaptation with low-dimensional multilingual output layer. In 2018 IEEE
International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
(pp. 5654-5658). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2018.8461476

Kim, C., & Stern, R. M. (2016). Power-normalized cepstral coefficients (PNCC) for
robust speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and
Language Processing, 24(7), 1315-1329.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2016.2550504

Kim, Y., Kim, J., Lee, S., & Kim, H. (2017). End-to-end speech recognition system for
real-time applications. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 63(4), 390-
396. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCE.2017.015063

Koenecke, A., Nam, A., Lake, E., Nudell, R., Quartey, M., Mengesha, Z., ... & Goel, R.
(2020). Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, 117(14), 7684–7689.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915768117

Kratzke, N., & Quint, P.-C. (2017). Understanding cloud-native applications after 10
years of cloud computing - A systematic mapping study. Journal of Systems and
Software, 126, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.01.001

Kumar, A. (2014). Python testing cookbook. Packt Publishing.

53
Lane, N. D., & Georgiev, P. (2015). Can deep learning revolutionize mobile sensing?
HotMobile '15: Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile
Computing Systems and Applications, 117-122.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2699343.2699349

Larman, C. (2004). Agile and iterative development: A manager's guide. Addison-

Wesley.

Larman, C., & Basili, V. R. (2003). Iterative and incremental development: A brief
history. IEEE Computer, 36(6), 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.1204375

Lasecki, W. S., Teevan, J., & Kamar, E. (2012). Real-time captioning by groups of non-
experts. UIST '12: Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User
Interface Software and Technology, 23-34.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380121

Li, D., Xu, Y., Zhao, J., & Wang, S. (2020). Efficient and scalable retrieval on cloud
storage using statistical data mining. IEEE Transactions on Big Data, 6(1), 92-103.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TBDATA.2017.2674979

Li, J., Deng, L., Haeb-Umbach, R., & Gong, Y. (2014). An overview of noise-robust
automatic speech recognition. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and
Language Processing, 22(4), 745–777.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TASLP.2014.2317981

Lippmann, R. P. (1997). Speech recognition by machines and humans. Speech

Communication, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6393(97)00020-5

Makhoul, J. (1975). Linear prediction: A tutorial review. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(4),
561-580. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1975.9792

McFee, B., Raffel, C., Liang, D., Ellis, D. P., McVicar, M., Battenberg, E., & Nieto, O.
(2015). librosa: Audio and music signal analysis in Python. Proceedings of the 14th
Python in Science Conference, 18-24. https://doi.org/10.25080/Majora-7b98e3ed-
003

Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. (2010). Recurrent
neural network based language model. INTERSPEECH 2010: Proceedings of the
11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association,
1045-1048.
54
Mikolov, T., Karafiát, M., Burget, L., Černocký, J., & Khudanpur, S. (2010). Recurrent
neural network based language model. INTERSPEECH 2010: Proceedings of the
11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association,
1045-1048.

Mohamed, A., Rosca, M., Figurnov, M., & Mnih, A. (2019). Privacy-preserving
automatic speech recognition for voice assistants using multi-party computation.
Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference, 2403–2413.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313700

Morgan, N., & Bourlard, H. (1995). Neural networks for statistical recognition of
continuous speech. Proceedings of the IEEE, 83(5), 742-772.
https://doi.org/10.1109/5.381848

Moshagen, M., & Thielsch, M. T. (2010). Facets of visual aesthetics. International

Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(10), 689-709.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.05.006

Musa, J. D. (1998). Software reliability engineering. McGraw-Hill.

Myers, G. J., Sandler, C., & Badgett, T. (2011). The art of software testing (3rd ed.).
Wiley.

Nass, C., & Brave, S. (2005). Wired for speech: How voice activates and advances the
human-computer relationship. MIT Press.

Naylor, P. A., & Gaubitch, N. D. (Eds.). (2010). Speech dereverberation. Springer

Science & Business Media.

Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.

Nielsen, J. (2001). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. New Riders
Publishing.

Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., ... & Chintala, S.
(2019). PyTorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library.
NeurIPS '19: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural
Information Processing Systems, 8026-8037.

55
Pressman, R. S. (2014). Software engineering: A practitioner's approach (8th ed.).
McGraw-Hill Education.

Rabiner, L. R. (1989). A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in

speech recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 77(2), 257-286.
https://doi.org/10.1109/5.18626

Rabiner, L. R., & Juang, B. H. (1986). An introduction to hidden Markov models. IEEE
ASSP Magazine, 3(1), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MASSP.1986.1165342

Rabiner, L., & Juang, B. H. (1993). Fundamentals of speech recognition. Prentice Hall.

Rane, S. (2013). Privacy-preserving processing of speech signals. IEEE Signal

Processing Magazine, 30(2), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2012.2230394

Reynolds, D. A. (2009). Gaussian mixture models. In Encyclopedia of Biometrics (pp.

659-663). Springer US.

Sakoe, H., & Chiba, S. (1978). Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken
word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,
26(1), 43-49. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASSP.1978.1163055

Satyanarayanan, M. (2017). The emergence of edge computing. Computer, 50(1), 30-39.

https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.9

Satzinger, J. W., Jackson, R. B., & Burd, S. D. (2012). Systems analysis and design in a
changing world (6th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Schach, S. R. (2011). Object-oriented and classical software engineering (8th ed.).

McGraw-Hill Education.

Schmandt, C. (1994). Voice communication with computers: Conversational systems.

Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Sears, A., & Jacko, J. A. (2009). Human-computer interaction: Designing for diverse
users and domains. CRC Press.

Shi, W., Cao, J., Zhang, Q., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2016). Edge computing: Vision and
challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 3(5), 637-646.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2016.2579198

56
Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 84-91.
https://doi.org/10.1145/332833.332843

Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2010). Designing the user interface: Strategies for
effective human-computer interaction (5th ed.). Pearson.

Sommerville, I. (2011). Software engineering (9th ed.). Addison-Wesley.

Tidwell, J. (2010). Designing interfaces (2nd ed.). O'Reilly Media.

Van Rossum, G., & Drake, F. L. (2009). Python 3 reference manual. CreateSpace.

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... &
Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, 30, 6000-6010.

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... &
Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. NeurIPS '17: Proceedings of the
31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 6000-
6010.

Vesely, K., Hannemann, M., & Burget, L. (2013). Semi-supervised training of deep
neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech
Recognition and Understanding (pp. 267-272).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ASRU.2013.6707745

Watanabe, S., Hori, T., Kim, S., Hershey, J. R., & Hayashi, T. (2017). Hybrid
CTC/attention architecture for end-to-end speech recognition. IEEE Journal of
Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 11(8), 1240-1253.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2017.2763455

Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing
a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii-xxiii.

Weng, F., Yao, K., Yu, D., Seltzer, M. L., Li, G., Zweig, G., & Ju, Y. C. (2016).
Personalized speech recognition using expanded hypotheses spaces. In 2016 IEEE
International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
(pp. 5955-5959). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7472823

57
Young, S., Evermann, G., Gales, M., Hain, T., Kershaw, D., Liu, X., ... & Woodland, P.
(2002). The HTK book (for HTK version 3.2). Cambridge University Engineering
Department.

Zhang, X., & Woodland, P. C. (2018). Automatic speech recognition. In S. Furui & T. S.
Huang (Eds.), Handbook of speech processing (pp. 659-682). Springer.

Zhang, Z., Geiger, J., Pohjalainen, J., Mousa, A. E. D., Jin, W., & Schuller, B. W. (2017).
Deep learning for environmentally robust speech recognition: An overview of
recent developments. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology
(TIST), 9(5), 49.

Zheng, F., Zhang, G., & Song, Z. (2015). Robust speaker recognition based on Bayesian
speaker adaptation. Speech Communication, 76, 108-121.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2015.01.004

58
 APPENDIX
import speech_recognition as sr
import pyttsx3
import pyaudio
import tkinter as tk
from tkinter import scrolledtext, messagebox

# Initialize recognizer and text-to-speech engine

recognizer = sr.Recognizer()
engine = pyttsx3.init()

# Function to start speech recognition

def start_listening():
try:
with sr.Microphone() as mic:
recognizer.adjust_for_ambient_noise(mic, duration=0.2)
audio = recognizer.listen(mic)

text = recognizer.recognize_google(audio)
text = text.lower()

# Append recognized text to the text box

text_box.insert(tk.END, f"Recognized: {text}\n")
text_box.see(tk.END) # Scroll to the end
except sr.UnknownValueError:
messagebox.showerror("Error", "Could not understand the audio")

# Function to clear the text box

def clear_text():
text_box.delete(1.0, tk.END)

# Create the main window

window = tk.Tk()
window.title("Speech Recognition App")
window.geometry("500x400")

59
# Create a text box to display recognized text
text_box = scrolledtext.ScrolledText(window, wrap=tk.WORD, width=50, height=15)
text_box.pack(pady=10)

# Create a button to start listening

listen_button = tk.Button(window, text="Start Listening", command=start_listening,
bg='green', fg='white')
listen_button.pack(pady=10)

# Create a button to clear the text box

clear_button = tk.Button(window, text="Clear", command=clear_text, bg='red',
fg='white')
clear_button.pack(pady=10)
# Run the GUI event loop
window.mainloop()

60