Ingles PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

¿Can news on social media be trusted?

Maria Alejandra Vasquez

Nataly Robledo Herrera

EXIGENCIA INGLÉS VII_202415_1002

Universidad del Norte

Barranquilla, Colombia

2024
¿Can news on social media be trusted?
Did you know that 65% of the news on social networks is false? In today's digital age, where

information spreads rapidly, the credibility of news shared on social media platforms is

increasingly questioned. Many believe the sheer volume of information on these platforms

can make it challenging to discern truth from fiction. While some argue that social media

diversifies voices and offers alternative perspectives, it cannot be denied that social media

news is easily manipulated to promote agendas. Additionally, the lack of fact-checking

mechanisms on many social media platforms exacerbates the spread of misinformation. As a

result, users are often urged to critically evaluate the sources and validity of news they

encounter online. Despite efforts to combat misinformation, false information can spread

faster than corrections on social media. So, Social networks may be faster at spreading

breaking news, but they are easily manipulated

First, News on social media platforms is often manipulated to suit certain agendas, whether

political, social, or economic. This manipulation of news undermines the credibility of

information shared on social media, making it difficult for users to discern truth from

falsehood. With the ease of creating and sharing content, misinformation and disinformation

can quickly proliferate, leading to confusion and distrust among users. The viral nature of

social media amplifies the spread of false information, often outpacing efforts to debunk it.

Consequently, individuals may unintentionally contribute to the dissemination of

misinformation by sharing content without verifying its accuracy. This phenomenon

highlights the need for improved digital literacy skills to navigate the complex landscape of

social media news. Additionally, the presence of echo chambers and filter bubbles further

reinforces existing beliefs and biases, hindering critical thinking and open-mindedness.
Despite these challenges, efforts by platforms, fact-checkers, and users themselves are

underway to mitigate the impact of misinformation on social media.However, proponents of

social media argue that these platforms diversify voices and offer alternative perspectives that

traditional media may not provide. Social media allows individuals from diverse backgrounds

to share their views and experiences, contributing to a more inclusive discourse. Additionally,

it provides a platform for grassroots movements and marginalized communities to amplify

their voices and raise awareness about important issues. Nevertheless, despite the potential

benefits of diversifying voices, the lack of regulation in social media allows uncontrolled

spread of false information. While traditional media outlets are subject to editorial standards

and fact-checking processes, social media platforms often lack stringent measures to verify

the accuracy of information shared. This unchecked dissemination of false information erodes

trust in the veracity of news on social media, ultimately undermining its credibility as a

reliable source of information.

Second, Social networks play a crucial role in the rapid dissemination of news, exposing

hidden situations. They also allow people to share images, videos and testimonies in real

time, which is especially useful during protests, conflicts or natural disasters. In Colombia,

social media has played an important role, particularly during times of crisis and conflict.

During the 2019 and 2021 protests, platforms such as Twitter, Facebook and Instagram were

instrumental in sharing real-time information about the situation on the streets and

documenting possible human rights violations by the authorities. For example, viral videos

shared on Twitter showed instances of police violence during the demonstrations, raising

public awareness and debate about the government's handling of the protests. However, the

lack of fact-checking and ease of sharing content can lead to the rapid spread of false or

misleading information. Kenneth Newton said that ‘Social media are the least trustworthy of
all media’. While social media provides a space for anyone to share information, which can

be both an advantage and a disadvantage, it is important to recognise that it can help spread

the truth and disseminate verified information, people can make allegations and what is

happening at the time.

In conclusion, the role of social media in disseminating information is a complex dilemma.

While it is a powerful medium for sharing news, uncovering truth and connecting people

around the world, it is also susceptible to manipulation and the spread of false information.

This dilemma forces us to be critical and cautious about the information we consume and

share online. While social media has the potential to be a positive force for change and

transparency, it also requires greater responsibility on the part of users and platforms to

ensure the veracity and integrity of the information being circulated.

REFERENCES

Newton, K. (2021). Widespread Reach, not much Influence: Online News and Mass Political
Attitudes and Behaviour in the UK.
https://doi-org.ezproxy.uninorte.edu.co/10.1111/1467-923X.13052

You might also like