03 9708 22 MS Prov Rma 23022024050650
03 9708 22 MS Prov Rma 23022024050650
03 9708 22 MS Prov Rma 23022024050650
ECONOMICS 9708/22
Paper 2 AS Level Data Response and Essays March 2024
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 60
template
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the
question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 2:
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 3:
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However,
credit is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark
scheme, referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation, and grammar when
these features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 4:
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g., in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 5:
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
GENERIC MARKING PRINCIPLE 6:
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
Marking of work should be positive, rewarding achievement where possible, but clearly differentiating
across the whole range of marks, where appropriate.
The marker should look at the work and then make a judgement about which level statement is the
best fit. In practice, work does not always match one level statement precisely so a judgement may
need to be made between two or more level statements.
Once a best-fit level statement has been identified, use the following guidance to decide on a specific
mark:
If the candidate’s work convincingly meets the level statement, award the highest mark.
If the candidate’s work adequately meets the level statement, award the most appropriate mark
in the middle of the range (where middle marks are available).
If the candidate’s work just meets the level statement, award the lowest mark.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly convey
the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they are
correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one prompt/
numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g., State two reasons …)
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is
required. (Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities, e.g., a scattergun approach to a question asking for n items
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror statements’
(i.e., polluted/not polluted)
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct unless this is part of the test. However, spellings
of syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus
terms with which they may be confused (e.g., Corrasion/Corrosion)
Assessment objectives
AO2 Analysis
Examine economic issues and relationships, using relevant economic concepts, theories,
and information.
Select, interpret, and organise economic information in written, numerical, and diagrammatic form.
Use economic information to recognise patterns, relationships, causes and effects.
Explain the impacts and consequences of changes in economic variables.
AO3 Evaluation
Recognise assumptions and limitations of economic information and models.
Assess economic information and the strengths and weaknesses of arguments.
Recognise that some economic decisions involve consideration of factors such as priorities and
value judgements.
Communicate reasoned judgements, conclusions, and decisions, based on the arguments.
Use this table to give marks for each candidate response for AO1 Knowledge and understanding and
AO2 Analysis for Questions 2(b), 3(b), 4(b) and 5(b).
Analysis is developed and detailed and makes accurate and relevant use of
economic concepts and theories. Where necessary, there is accurate and
relevant use of analytical tools such as diagrams and formulae, and these
are fully explained.
The response addresses the general theme of the question and the relevant
economic issues, with limited development.
Analysis is generally accurate with some development but little detail. Uses
analytical tools such as diagrams and formulae where necessary. Use of
these tools is partially accurate or not fully explained.
Responses are generally logical and coherent but are sometimes lacking in
focus or organisation.
1 A small number of relevant knowledge points are included, and the 1–2
response is limited by significant errors or omissions.
0 No creditable response. 0
Use this table to give marks for each candidate response for AO3 Evaluation for Questions 2(b),
3(b), 4(b) and 5(b).
Both countries experience positive growth over the period. (1) Both
experience a slowdown in the rate of growth. (1) Over the period Japanese
growth is slower than the USA. (1) average Growth rate in Japan over the
period is 1.5%, USA 2.7%
1(b) With the help of a production possibility curve (PPC) diagram, 2
demonstrate the likely impact of increased investment in AI on the
Japanese economy in the long run.
In the short run many jobs may be lost as AI capital equipment replaces
labour operated machines and vehicles. E.g., Thousands of truck drivers lose
their jobs. (1) for statement, (1) for example. Extra mark for some further
elaboration. (1)
In the long run more job opportunities may arise as was the case with the
internet. E.g., High tech maintenance jobs for AI machinery. (1) for
statement, (1) for example. Extra mark for some further elaboration. (1)
Max of 5marks plus 1 for Evaluated Conclusion. Use textbox to show mark
distribution. (2,3,1)
Follow the point-based marking guidance at the top of this mark scheme and
award:
up to 3 marks for AO1 Knowledge and understanding up to 3 marks for AO2
Analysis
up to 2 marks for AO3 Evaluation.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
Indicative content
AO3 Evaluation
Consideration that fully assesses the relative effectiveness of the policies
analysed in reducing the consumption of demerit goods and arrives at a
reasoned conclusion concerning whether improved provision of information
is the ‘best’ approach
Follow the point-based marking guidance at the top of this mark scheme and
award:
up to 3 marks for AO1 Knowledge and understanding up to 3 marks for AO2
Analysis
up to 2 marks for AO3 Evaluation.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
Indicative content
AO3 Evaluation
Consideration that fully assesses the relative effectiveness of both PED/PES
estimates and their implications for business decision-making and arrives at
a reasoned conclusion concerning which concept (or otherwise) is most
useful
Follow the point-based marking guidance at the top of this mark scheme and
award:
up to 3 marks for AO1 Knowledge and understanding up to 3 marks for AO2
Analysis
up to 2 marks for AO3 Evaluation.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
Indicative content
AO3 Evaluation
Consideration that fully assesses the relative effectiveness of the policies
analysed in reducing a current account deficit and arrives at a reasoned
conclusion concerning whether fiscal policy is the ‘best’ approach
Follow the point-based marking guidance at the top of this mark scheme and
award:
up to 3 marks for AO1 Knowledge and understanding up to 3 marks for AO2
Analysis
up to 2 marks for AO3 Evaluation.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
Indicative content
AO3 Evaluation
Consideration that fully assesses the relative perspectives of economic
growth for an economy and arrives at a reasoned conclusion concerning
which viewpoint (or otherwise) is most likely.