Rethinking
Rethinking
ASSETS ACROSS
THE GLOBE:
RETHINKING
THE OPERATING
MODEL
As margin pressures grow
across the investment
industry, investment
managers around the world
are rethinking their operating
models to support growth,
adapt to change and position
themselves for the future.
Leveraging today ’s innovative
technology and scalable
solutions can significantly
reduce costs and enhance
operational efficiencies
– helping firms remain
competitive in the drive for
Operational AlphaTM.
MANAGING ASSETS ACROSS THE GLOBE: RETHINKING THE OPERATING MODEL
83%
OF ASSET MANAGERS PREDICT
60%
OF ASSET MANAGERS CITE
49%
NAMED TECHNOLOGY
A FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE IN REGULATION AS A DRIVING INNOVATION AS THE SECOND
THEIR OPERATING MODEL IN FACTOR TO OPERATING BIGGEST DRIVING FACTOR TO
THE NEXT 12-24 MONTHS. V MODEL CHANGE. V BACK OFFICE CHANGE. V
The investment management industry remains under pressure. Costs are escalating Operational AlphaTM is the
for many, fees are stretched for some, and margins are being compressed at a value an organisation gains
time when the industry is facing increasingly complex regulatory and compliance by improving operational
challenges, as well as growing technology demands. processes to increase efficiency,
maximise technology and
Many investment houses will find it increasingly difficult to drive performance
reduce costs.
and achieve investment alpha. Though asset management companies enjoyed
an average compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7% for assets under
management between 2012 and 2018, their profits per asset decreased by 2%
CAGR, according to estimates from Bain & Company – and the consultancy has
predicted a sharp decline going forward.i
Similarly, Morgan Stanley and Oliver Wyman reported that asset management costs
rose 8% globally in 2017, which was 5% higher than the annualised growth rate for
+8%
RISE IN ASSET MANAGEMENT
the preceding five years, limiting margin improvement in what was a record year COSTS IN 2017
for asset growth.ii The numbers continue to be stark, with little progress on cost
reductions made in 2018. In their latest report, Morgan Stanley and Oliver Wyman
+4%
state costs rose a further 4% in 2018.iii
If that were not enough, assuming markets were to fall, and the recovery were slow,
the Boston Consulting Group believes margins could drop to between 25% and
28% by 2023 – taking nearly a third off the current margin profile for the industry.iv RISE IN ASSET MANAGEMENT
COSTS IN 2018
It is no surprise then that to drive performance in this challenging investment
landscape, asset managers and asset owners managing money across the
globe are increasingly exploring scalable solutions to help them reduce costs
and build efficiencies.
Asset managers that want to future-proof their firms are repositioning themselves
by re-evaluating and optimising their operating models. Many seek to take
advantage of new opportunities, innovative thinking, and new methodologies
in the search for Operational AlphaTM – the value an organisation gains by
improving operational processes to increase efficiency, maximise technology
and reduce costs.
There is no ‘one size fits all’ operating model in asset management. But
broadly speaking, an operating model comprises the people, processes, and
technology that define a company’s business approach and vision for the
future. Operating models provide the roadmap to delivering value. They
address how resources should be allocated, how client and other key business
relationships are developed and serviced and how critical functions, such as
the back, middle, and front office, are supported.
To achieve Operational AlphaTM, it is now more important than ever for investment
firms to be agile, competitive, and efficient. Scalable solutions can help firms
reduce costs, eliminate redundancies and shorten time to market. The results can
include higher-quality data flows, improved governance and transparency, better
assessment of costs, re-evaluation of priorities, and enhanced client relationships.
Where does a firm begin when rethinking the traditional way of doing things?
This paper highlights five key opportunities that will allow asset managers to
make great strides toward future-proofing their operations. These include:
15-20%
For many investment managers, today’s operating models are
increasingly complicated networks with technology at their core.
PwC believes that as technology (in the form of automated advice and client
service) becomes prevalent, the industry will consolidate in certain developed
62%
OF ASSET MANAGEMENT SURVEY
markets, with up to 20% of the firms currently in existence either being acquired RESPONDENTS CITE “REPLACING
or eliminated.vi MANUAL PROCESSES WITH
AUTOMATED TECHNOLOGY” AS AN
Asset managers have to stay ahead of the curve in order to remain competitive IMPORTANT GOAL FOR OPERATIONS.
and technological innovation is playing an increasingly decisive role in separating
the ‘winners’ from the ‘losers’. Successful firms continuously evaluate the role of
technology in their operating models and create integrated, holistic solutions across
their platforms. Technology is already estimated to be 15%-20% of the industry cost
base,vii and, as Morgan Stanley and Oliver Wyman point out, leading players are
outspending their mid-tier rivals on innovation by a ratio of as much as 3:1.viii
One particular concern for many firms is technology drag. Technology depreciates
both financially and in terms of performance, and traditional investment cycles in Managers that have resource
technology last around five years. However, with industry-wide moves to heighten constraints may choose to
digital capabilities and draw on agile development techniques, innovation is outsource certain functions
occurring much faster than this.
to a third-party provider who
The most successful investment firms are not just moving to agile solutions; they are already has the technology
adopting an agile mind-set. This includes placing cross-functional teams around built into their solutions and the
products and services, and empowering those teams to achieve results. ability to invest in technological
Successful asset managers are also hiring technology talent to drive a new and innovation.
creative vision and culture in their organisations. They are identifying disruptive
technologies, and re-designing long-standing processes. They are embracing
machine learning to perform repetitive tasks faster and with greater accuracy.
Many are using public and private cloud capabilities to gain efficiencies and scale
in powering their businesses. They are also drawing on predictive analysis to
deliver data-driven insights to support their decision-making.
SPLITTING TECHNOLOGY
INTO ‘CORE’ AND ‘NON-
CORE’ AREAS ALLOWS A
DIFFERENT APPROACH
TO BE TAKEN TO EACH.
Here, it is often helpful to split technology into two separate areas of ‘core’ and ‘non-core’
focus, as this allows asset managers to take a different approach to each.
In the ‘core’ section, investment firms should place anything that can support them in
attracting or retaining business. Any technology or system that helps articulate their vision,
informs investment decisions, or is part of the product set, should be included in this first
section and be part of any agile programme.
The second area of ‘non-core’ focus relates to any technology that is commoditised, such as
reconciliations, which should be procured as a service where possible. This can allow firms to
devote greater resources to, and focus more closely on, their areas of expertise.
Other ways managers may use technology to gain a competitive edge include adopting a cloud-
first strategy. By placing architecture in the cloud, managers are able to reduce development cycles
and create a more flexible cost base. Investment firms should also sunset legacy applications as
new technologies are introduced to help prevent regulatory concerns that may arise later from
fractured data and operations.
Managers that have resource constraints may choose to outsource certain functions to a third-
party provider who already has the technology built into their solutions and the ability to invest in
technological innovation. Outsourcing can level the playing field for smaller or medium-sized firms by
reducing the amount of investment required to move away from an outdated technology model.
• Successful firms evaluate the role of technology in their operating models, and create integrated,
holistic solutions across their platforms.
• The most successful investment firms are not just moving to agile solutions; they are adopting an agile
mind-set. This includes hiring key talent to drive new and creative visions.
• Investment firms must consider whether it makes more sense to build or buy new technology solutions.
Asset managers must also be mindful about potential future limitations when making their selections.
• Splitting technology into ‘core’ and ‘non-core’ functions helps asset managers take a different
approach to each to maximise efficiencies.
• Outsourcing certain functions to a third-party provider with technology built into its solutions
can help managers harness the latest innovations.
In the last 10 years, the global regulatory landscape has changed in complexity.
Investment firms that want to stay ahead of the changes are looking at the role of
compliance through a new lens.
For example, MiFID II is not mandated in Asian markets but has become best
practice in cross-border markets such as Hong Kong, Australia, and Singapore
which have implemented their own Manager-in-Charge regimes. Modernisation
and the advent of multiple post-trade regulations - such as Form CPO-PQR,
Form PF, and form N-PORT in the US, and the Alternative Investment Fund
Managers Directive (AIFMD) in the EU - are also adding a sense of urgency to the
adoption of new standards.xiii
While many of these regulations are more prevalent outside the U.S., they are
slowly being adopted as best practice as managers compete with each other to
be seen as best-in-class in terms of their regulatory compliance and adherence
to the highest standards. The globalisation of key regulations – driven in part by
competition – is therefore an evolving trend.
Regulations have also emerged that are focused on culture and governance.
The UK’s Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SMCR), for example,
effective from December 2019, focuses more exclusively on personal conduct to
drive standards of investor protection and market stability.
Other regulators, such as the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the DEMAND FOR SKILLED STAFF AND TOP
Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) either are consulting (in the case of Singapore) THREE COSTS OF COMPLIANCE*
or are looking to consult (in the case of Ireland) on bringing in accountability
regimes in the near future.
73%
managers need to be more tailored and forward-thinking in their approach
to meeting regulatory obligations. This is because under principles-based
regulation, the onus of compliance lies with each individual organisation
to define their approach to meeting standards, and evidence how it meets ADDITIONAL SENIOR STAFF REQUIRED
regulatory requirements. TO COPE WITH VOLUMES OF
REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
For asset managers, ensuring compliance with multiple regulations – with
accompanying requirements for reporting and transparency, disclosure and risk
52%
management – is not necessarily straightforward. A firm’s operating model must
both facilitate these requirements and adapt to meet future regulatory change.
In a 2019 RegTech brief, EY breaks down new technologies in the regulatory reporting
space into five key areas: report automation platforms, visual analytics, robotics, next-
generation data architecture, and business process management.xvi
EY points out that regulators, RegTech firms, professional service organisations and
financial institutions will all need to work together in an effort to continue to innovate,
reduce overall costs of compliance, and accurately and effectively report to regulators.xvii
• Successful firms have avoided the development of large, ‘siloed’ compliance functions within their
organisations, and have resisted delegating responsibility for compliance to certain groups or individuals.
• Investment firms should be forward-thinking and consider regulatory changes on a two to three-year time horizon.
• Asset managers must adopt a global and holistic approach to regulation in order to manage their
compliance functions successfully.
• Firms can utilise solutions available to support regulatory compliance through the application
of technology and data.
• For example, an outsourcing provider’s access to transaction data can allow it to help investment
managers meet their transaction reporting requirements under MiFID II.
As asset managers move into new areas of business and diversify their
strategies, the tools they use and the approaches they take to manage different
products and services can change. As they grow, firms may look to outsourced
providers to enhance or replace their in-house capabilities. By embracing
outsourcing and developing an ‘ecosystem’ of trusted partners, asset
managers can create solutions that provide greater scale, flexibility and speed
to market – and in turn, help them achieve Operational AlphaTM.
Many organisations, particularly larger firms taking a multi-sourcing approach Technology must be organised
with different suppliers, struggle with service standardisation. Having multiple so the data is accessible and
providers can mean dealing with vastly different service approaches or systems flexible for all parties and
set-ups. They may therefore employ staff to cross-check and normalise the platforms.
work of multiple suppliers in order to manage their day-to-day business, which
can be costly and inefficient.
How can investment firms address these challenges? First, technology must
be organised so the data is accessible and flexible for all parties and platforms.
Asset managers should avoid ‘vendor lock-in’ - a situation where technology,
process, and partners are inextricably linked and impossible to separate.
The most successful investment firms are holistic in their thinking. Rather than
working on a case-by-case basis, they adopt a broad strategy for building
their systems, and are mindful of how technology selection and integration
may impact future requirements for expansion. They develop a ‘best-of-breed’
ecosystem of technology and outsourcing partners, and have strategic or
preferred partners in place at a functional level.
It’s important to remember that asset managers can outsource activity but
not responsibility. For this reason, the oversight function gains even greater
importance under an outsourcing model.
However, ahead of each business expansion, asset managers need to assess the Successful asset managers are
likely long-term costs of building in-house capabilities versus buying them. What mindful of how technology
are the costs of procuring and maintaining both the technology and the resources selection and integration may
to carry out the new function? Would the new function be duplicating work already impact future requirements for
carried out by other parts of the business or by an outsourced partner?
expansion.
In a ‘buy’ scenario, managers should see whether there are synergies with existing
suppliers at the process level, and whether the supplier technology integrates with
existing systems.
Firms that want to be more efficient need to carefully review their outsourcing
arrangements, remove duplicative processes where possible, and consolidate
services with providers that can offer global solutions.
• Asset managers should avoid ‘vendor lock-in’ - a situation that occurs when technology,
process, and partners are inextricably linked and impossible to separate.
• Investment firms and their service providers should be ‘technology agnostic’, with the flexibility
to change their suppliers or approach if necessary.
• Rather than working on a case-by-case basis with each supplier, successful asset managers have adopted
a broad strategy for building their systems, and are mindful of how technology selection and integration may
impact future requirements for expansion.
For many asset managers, the front office has been an untouchable component of Some start-up firms choose to set
their operational framework. Functions such as trading have been considered core up a business based entirely on
to asset management. Managers have tended to bundle their front office activities an outsourced, scalable model
together, while outsourcing their back and middle office functions. that can be ‘flexed’ up and down
In today’s market, many firms have cast their eyes to components of the front
as market conditions dictate.
office, particularly trading-related functions, and are embracing new solutions and
approaches. This is partly because technology has blurred the lines between front
office and middle office solutions and functions, and partly because the enormous
pressures facing asset managers do not seem likely to abate anytime soon.
Cost, again, is a key driver of change. The costs of building and running a trading
desk have increased. In the case of international asset managers in the U.S.,
Greenwich Associates found that investment research budgets had dropped
45% between 2009 and 2018. Meanwhile, the average trading desk manages 20
execution relationships and 32 research relationships with just two full-time traders.xix
Outsourcing front office functions such as trading is often seen as a way for asset
managers to control costs and also gain access to technology and expertise by
partnering with firms that offer scale and specialisation.
Some established managers are also outsourcing up the value chain across
all front office functions, such as trading, foreign exchange, and transition
management. In some cases, they are moving towards fully outsourcing all
traditional front office capabilities.
Top-performing managers have shifted their thinking from ‘front’, ‘middle’ and ‘back’
office to ‘alpha’ and ‘non-alpha’-generating activities – with only functions critical to
alpha generation remaining a core part of the operations.
As responsibility cannot be outsourced, investment firms must ensure that they retain
sufficient oversight, and that they are given full transparency across all systems and
controls. They must also ensure that they are working with secure, well-capitalised,
independent counterparties that are heavily invested in technology and cyber-
security – and have lengthy experience in outsourcing partnerships.
• Managers have traditionally handled their own front office activities while outsourcing
back and middle office functions – but this is changing.
• Outsourcing is seen as a way for asset managers to control costs and gain access to technology
and expertise by partnering with firms that offer scale and specialisation.
• In some cases, investment firms are moving towards fully outsourcing all traditional front office capabilities.
• Many top performing managers have shifted their thinking from ‘front’, ‘middle’, and ‘back’
office to ‘alpha’ and ‘non-alpha’-generating activities.
• While fund managers can outsource certain functions, they cannot outsource responsibility. Investment firms must
ensure that they retain sufficient oversight, and that they are given full transparency across all systems and controls.
• Multiple options are available, whether that is front, middle, component, or end-to-end outsourcing,
which allow managers to flexibly design a model that best suits their needs.
Raising assets is the lifeblood of any asset management firm, and distribution is
To safeguard against the risk
a vital component of the operating model. Given how challenging it is to identify of uncontrolled cost escalation,
new opportunities, it is unsurprising that fund managers are zealous about investment firms need to closely
broadening their distribution, including looking to new asset types and markets weight up the cost/benefit
for asset growth. calculations of market entry,
fund structures and domiciles,
Investment managers are expanding their distribution efforts by entering new
and business strategy.
markets and offering new products in both their domestic strongholds and
overseas. While distribution can be focused on internal markets, PwC predicts
that regional and global platforms will dominate the industry.xx The firm believes
managers will need to determine early on which jurisdictions to establish their
platforms in, and which product sets to offer.
The structure of any new fund product should be designed to meet the needs
of the target investor audience. Managers should consider where and to whom
they intend to sell, and look for the right legal and expense structures to meet the
demands of their target investors.
One area of expansion is cross-border distribution. For investment firms that get
cross-border distribution right, the rewards can be substantial – but the market is
not without its complexity.
For example, a UK investment firm seeking to register five funds across Italy,
Switzerland, Germany, Austria, and France would need to:
• Ensure their marketing and pitch books are legally compliant in each market.
To safeguard against the risk of uncontrolled cost escalation, investment firms need
to closely weight up the cost/benefit calculations of market entry, fund structures Firms may not have accurate
and domiciles, and business strategy. Would a targeted approach, focusing on sales data for their distribution
a particular segment of a market, or a small group of countries where certain
network, which makes it difficult
strategies are used, make more sense than large scale market entry, for example?
to understand the success of
Importance of Investor Data sales managers and distributors.
When investment firms operate across multiple markets from a single fund domicile
using third party distributors, they often find it difficult to measure exactly where
their sales success is coming from – and even from which distributors the flows are
originating – adding further complexity.
When subscriptions arrive via a global distribution platform, they are held in the
fund register as part of a larger nominee position. Acquiring data that relates back to
the underlying distributor is a bit like peeling back an onion, and a very painstaking
manual process.
In addition, firms may not have accurate sales data for their distribution network,
which makes it difficult to understand the success of sales managers and
distributors, and makes sales planning and deciding where to focus and deploy
resources challenging.
ENSURE TECHNOLOGY
ARCHITECTURE
MEETS THE NEEDS
OF UNDERLYING
INVESTORS.
Before entering a market, asset managers must ensure that sales and service are a
key part of their business proposition, and that their technology architecture can
meet the needs of their underlying investors, particularly as those investors tend to
be increasingly global.
At a time when distribution shelf space is shrinking, and the number of mutual funds
in developed markets is expected to decline by up to 25%,xxii it is more important
than ever to build the right operating capabilities around distribution, and to
understand the needs of the target investor. Leveraging key partners to support a
global and/or local model that delivers in a local time zone, language, and other
cultural nuances, while providing investors with 24/7 access to their data, will be
critical to success.
• When investment firms operate across multiple markets from a single fund domicile using third party
distributors, they often find it difficult to measure exactly where their sales success is coming from.
• Before entering a target market, fund managers must ensure their technology architecture and
product construct can meet the needs of their underlying, increasingly global investors.
• Leveraging key partners to support a global and/or local model that delivers in a local
time zone and language, and provides investors with 24/7 access to their data, will be key.
The investment industry is changing, and now more than ever, agility and flexibility Successful operating models
are keys to success. A myriad of pressures, from falling margins and revenues to can lead to successful
the rapid pace of technological innovation, shine the spotlight on asset managers’ businesses – while inefficient
operations. Those who stay ahead of the curve are adopting new solutions and ones are unlikely to survive in
seizing opportunities to future-proof their operating models. the long-term.
Successful operating models can lead to successful businesses – while inefficient
ones are unlikely to survive in the long-term. The most successful asset managers are
those that grow their businesses while controlling their costs. In today’s compressed
market condition this is best achieved with Operational AlphaTM.
While the pressures are significant, so are the opportunities. Whether the solution
involves embracing new technology, navigating regulation differently, leveraging
the right outsourcing partners, re-evaluating front office functions, or taking a fresh
approach to distribution, the successful asset manager of the future will integrate
people, processes, and technology – and prioritise all three.
FOOTNOTES
i
Bain & Company “After the Easy Money Boom, Stark Choice for Asset Managers” Last Updated: 2 July 2018
https://www.bain.com/insights/after-the-easy-money-boom-stark-choices-for-asset-managers/
II
Morgan Stanley and Oliver Wyman Blue Paper “Winning Under Pressure” March 2018.
https://www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/v2/publications/2018/march/Wholesale-Banks-Asset-
Managers-Winning-Under-Pressure-2018.pdf
III
Morgan Stanley and Oliver Wyman Bluepaper “Searching for Growth in an Age of Disruption”, 2019,
https://www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/v2/publications/2019/mar/wholesale-banks-asset-
management-analysis-2019.pdf
IV
Boston Consulting Group “How Asset Managers Can Win in a Winner-Takes-All World”
https://www.bcg.com/en-gb/publications/2019/asset-managers-winner-takes-all.aspx
V
Confluence “Asset Management Trend Survey Report Q4 2017” 2017
https://www.confluence.com/uploads/confluence-2017-asset-management-trend-survey-report.pdf
VI
PwC “Asset & Wealth Management Revolution” October 2018Vhttps://www.PwC.lu/en/asset-management/awm-
revolution-pressure-on-profitability.html
VII
Morgan Stanley and Oliver Wyman Blue Paper “Winning Under Pressure” March 2018.
https://www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/v2/publications/2018/march/Wholesale-Banks-Asset-
Managers-Winning-Under-Pressure-2018.pdf
VIII
Ibid.
IX
Confluence “Asset Management Trend Survey Report Q4 2017” 2017
https://www.confluence.com/uploads/confluence-2017-asset-management-trend-survey-report.pdf
X
ThomsonReuters “The Cost of Compliance 2019 Report” Last Updated 27 June 2019
https://blogs.thomsonreuters.com/answerson/cost-of-compliance-survey-2019/
XI
Ibid.
XII
Financial Times “Invesco and Wellington Eye Global Adoption of MiFID II” Last Updated 4 March 2019
https://www.ft.com/content/075382ef-6c58-3b21-9010-63aa8e013d70
XIII
Confluence “Asset Management Trend Survey Report Q4 2017” 2017
https://www.confluence.com/uploads/confluence-2017-asset-management-trend-survey-report.pdf
XIV
Oliver Wyman “Time To Start Again: Preliminary Views on Regulation Best Interest” 2019 https://www.oliverwyman.
com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/v2/media/2019/may/Oliver_Wyman_Regulation_Best_Interest.pdf
XV
ThomsonReuters “The Cost of Compliance 2018” 2018 https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/content/dam/ewp-m/
documents/legal/en/pdf/reports/cost-of-compliance-special-report-2018.pdf
XVI
EY “Regulatory technology (RegTech)Navigating the right technology to manage the evolving regulatory environment”
2019 https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-regulatory-technology-regtech/$FILE/ey-regulatory-technology-
(regtech).pdf
XVII
Ibid.
XVIII
SEI “The Investment Management Operating Model 2.0” 2017
https://seic.com/sites/default/files/SEI-IMS-InvMgmtOps-2.0-EU.pdf
XIX
Greenwich Associates “Outsourced Trading: Helping the Buy Side Improve Execution and Enhance Operational
Efficiency” Q4 2018 https://www.greenwich.com/press-release/new-report-finds-outsourced-trading-gaining-
popularity-us-institutional-asset-managers
XX
PwC “Asset Management 2020: A Brave New World” 2014 https://www.PwC.com/gx/en/asset-management/
publications/pdfs/PwC-asset-management-2020-a-brave-new-world-final.pdf
XXI
Ibid.
XXII
PwC “Asset & Wealth Management Revolution” October 2018
https://www.PwC.lu/en/asset-management/awm-revolution-pressure-on-profitability.html
A proven partner to some of the world’s most successful and innovative investment
managers, Northern Trust has over 30 years’ experience administering the full spectrum of
investment strategies for clients around the globe. We help facilitate improved speed-to-
market, operational efficiency, business focus and distribution for our clients’ traditional
and alternative funds. Our solutions include fund administration, global custody,
investment risk analytics, back-and-middle office investment operations outsourcing,
institutional brokerage and solutions to support regulatory change.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This communication is confidential, may be privileged, and is meant only for the intended recipient. If you are not
the intended recipient, please notify the sender as soon as possible. All materials contained in this presentation, including the description of
Northern Trust, its systems, processes and pricing methodology, are proprietary information of Northern Trust. In consideration of acceptance
of these materials, the recipient agrees that it will keep all such materials strictly confidential and that it will not, without the prior written consent
of Northern Trust, distribute such materials or any part thereof to any person outside the recipient’s organization or to any individual within the
recipient’s organization who is not directly involved in reviewing this presentation, unless required to do so by applicable law. If the recipient is
a consultant acting on behalf of a third party client, the recipient may share such materials with its client if it includes a copy of these restrictions
with such materials. In such event, the client agrees to comply with these restrictions in consideration of its accepting such materials.
© 2021 Northern Trust Corporation. Head Office: 50 South La Salle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60603 U.S.A. Incorporated with limited liability as an
Illinois corporation under number 0014019. Products and services provided by subsidiaries of Northern Trust Corporation may vary in different
markets and are offered in accordance with local regulation. This material is directed to professional clients only and is not intended for retail
clients. For Asia-Pacific markets, it is directed to expert, institutional, professional and wholesale clients or investors only and should not
be relied upon by retail clients or investors. For legal and regulatory information about our offices and legal entities, visit northerntrust.
com/disclosures. The following information is provided to comply with local disclosure requirements: The Northern Trust Company, London
Branch, Northern Trust Global Investments Limited, Northern Trust Securities LLP and Northern Trust Investor Services Limited, 50 Bank Street,
London E14 5NT. Northern Trust Global Services SE, 10 rue du Château d’Eau, L-3364 Leudelange, Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, incorporated
with limited liability in Luxembourg at the RCS under number B232281; Northern Trust Global Services SE UK Branch, 50 Bank Street, London E14
5NT; Northern Trust Global Services SE Sweden Bankfilial, Ingmar Bergmans gata 4, 1st Floor, 114 34 Stockholm, Sweden; Northern Trust Global
Services SE Netherlands Branch, Viñoly 7th floor, Claude Debussylaan 18 A, 1082 MD Amsterdam; Northern Trust Global Services SE Abu Dhabi
Branch, registration Number 000000519 licenced by ADGM under FSRA # 160018; Northern Trust Global Services SE Norway Branch, 3rd Floor,
Haakon VII’s Gate 6, 0161 Oslo, Norway; Northern Trust Global Services SE Leudelange, Zweigniederlassung Basel, Aeschenplatz 6, 4052, Basel,
Switzerland. The Northern Trust Company Saudi Arabia, PO Box 7508, Level 20, Kingdom Tower, Al Urubah Road, Olaya District, Riyadh, Kingdom
of Saudi Arabia 11214-9597, a Saudi Joint Stock Company – Capital 52 million SAR. Regulated and Authorised by the Capital Market Authority
License # 12163-26 CR 1010366439. Northern Trust (Guernsey) Limited (2651)/Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) Limited (29806)/
Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Guernsey) Limited (15532) Registered Office: Trafalgar Court, Les Banques, St Peter
Port, Guernsey GY1 3DA. Northern Trust International Fund Administration Services (Ireland) Limited (160579) / Northern Trust Fiduciary Services
(Ireland) Limited (161386), Registered Office: Georges Court, 54-62 Townsend Street, Dublin 2, D02 R156, Ireland.