Human Environmental Interactions in Cities Challenges and Opportunities of Urban Land Use Planning and Green Infrastructure 1st Edition Nadja Kabisch
Human Environmental Interactions in Cities Challenges and Opportunities of Urban Land Use Planning and Green Infrastructure 1st Edition Nadja Kabisch
Human Environmental Interactions in Cities Challenges and Opportunities of Urban Land Use Planning and Green Infrastructure 1st Edition Nadja Kabisch
com
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWLOAD NOW
https://ebookname.com/product/land-use-planning-for-sustainable-
development-second-edition-jane-silberstein/
https://ebookname.com/product/land-use-planning-made-plain-2nd-
edition-hok-lin-leung/
https://ebookname.com/product/problems-and-planning-in-third-
world-cities-pacione/
https://ebookname.com/product/land-in-conflict-managing-and-
resolving-land-use-disputes-1st-edition-sean-nolon/
Heartland of Cities Surveys of Ancient Settlement and
Land Use on the Central Floodplain of the Euphrates 1st
Edition Adams Robert Maccormick
https://ebookname.com/product/heartland-of-cities-surveys-of-
ancient-settlement-and-land-use-on-the-central-floodplain-of-the-
euphrates-1st-edition-adams-robert-maccormick/
https://ebookname.com/product/foundations-of-environmental-
physics-understanding-energy-use-and-human-impacts-1st-edition-
ph-d-kyle-forinash-ph-d/
https://ebookname.com/product/urban-infrastructure-finance-and-
management-1st-edition-k-wellman/
https://ebookname.com/product/ethnic-diversity-in-eastern-africa-
opportunities-and-challenges-1st-edition-kimani-njogu/
https://ebookname.com/product/urban-land-markets-housing-
development-and-spatial-planning-in-sub-saharan-africa-a-case-of-
uganda-a-case-of-uganda-1st-edition-shuaib-lwasa/
Human-Environmental Interactions in Cities
Human-Environmental Interactions in Cities:
Challenges and Opportunities of Urban Land Use
Planning and Green Infrastructure
Edited by
All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system,
or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner.
Introduction ................................................................................................. 1
Nadja Kabisch, Neele Larondelle, Angela Reeve and Martina Artmann
NADJA KABISCH,
INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY, HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITY
BERLIN, GERMANY
DEPARTMENT OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY,
HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH – UFZ
LEIPZIG, GERMANY
NEELE LARONDELLE,
INSTITUTE OF GEOGRAPHY, HUMBOLDT-UNIVERSITY
BERLIN, GERMANY
ANGELA REEVE
QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, BRISBANE,
AUSTRALIA
AND MARTINA ARTMANN
DEPARTMENT GEOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY, UNIVERSITY
OF SALZBURG, AUSTRIA
Background
Over the last decade, there has been a surge in research on urbanisation
processes, with many scientific studies in the field of urban ecology
considering the relationship between these trends and biodiversity and
ecosystem services (Konijnendijk et al. 2013). Urbanisation, as a
phenomenon describing the relative increase of population in cities and
urban areas compared to a relative decrease of the rural population (United
Nations 2012), is one of the main driving forces influencing the quality of
urban life, the way in which biodiversity is present in the urban
environment and, the quality and quantity of ecosystem services.
This has become particularly pertinent since 2008, when the United
Nations announced that over half of the world´s population was living in
cities. Since that time, numerous studies have focused on the human-
2 Introduction
Concluding remarks
The range of papers presented in this book showcase a variety of
disciplinary, methodological and geographical perspectives, reflecting the
diversity and complexity of human-environmental interactions in a rapidly
urbanising world. The analysis of these interactions and the developments
and changes of urban habitats for species aims at the assessment of current
challenges of urban ecosystems. Current and future SURE activities will
certainly be devoted to these challenges.
References
Artmann, Martina. 2013. “Spatial Dimensions of Soil Sealing
Management in Growing and Shrinking Cities – a Systemic Multi-
Scale Analysis in Germany.” Erdkunde 67 (3) (September 30): 249–
264. doi:10.3112/erdkunde.2013.03.04.
Breuste, Jürgen. 2010. “Challenges and Problems of Implementing
Landscape Ecological Knowledge in Practice – the Case of Urban
Development.” The Problems of Landscape Ecology XXVIII: 23–32.
Breuste, Jürgen, Dagmar Haase, and Thomas Elmqvist. 2013. “Urban
Landscapes and Ecosystem Services.” In Ecosystem Services in
Agricultural and Urban Landscapes, edited by Stephen Wratten,
Harpinder Sandhu, Ross Cullen, and Robert Costanza, 83–104. Wiley.
Cork, S. 2001. “Ecosystem Services: The Many Ways in Which
Biodiversity Sustains and Fulfills Human Life: Forenbeitrag.” Nature
and Society.
Daily, Gretchen C, Stephen Polasky, Joshua Goldstein, Peter M Kareiva,
Harold a Mooney, Liba Pejchar, Taylor H Ricketts, James Salzman,
and Robert Shallenberger. 2009. “Ecosystem Services in Decision
Making: Time to Deliver.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7
(1) (February): 21–28. doi:10.1890/080025.
Dallimer, Martin, Katherine N. Irvine, Andrew M. J. Skinner, Zoe G.
Davies, James R. Rouquette, Lorraine L. Maltby, Philip H. Warren,
Paul R. Armsworth, and Kevin J. Gaston. 2012. “Biodiversity and the
Feel-Good Factor: Understanding Associations Between Self-Reported
8 Introduction
Abstract
The cognitive benefits of biophilia have been studied quite extensively,
dating as far back as the 1980s, while studies into economic benefits are
still in their infancy. Recent research has attempted to quantify a number
of economic returns on biophilic elements; however knowledge in this
field is still ad hoc and highly variable. Many studies acknowledge
difficulties in discerning information such as certain social and aesthetic
benefits. While conceptual understanding of the physiological and
psychological effects of exposure to nature is widely recognised and
understood, this has not yet been systematically translated into monetary
terms. It is clear from the literature that further research is needed to both
obtain data on the economics of biophilic urbanism, and to create the
business case for biophilic urbanism. With this in mind, this paper will
briefly highlight biophilic urbanism referencing previous work in the field.
It will then explore a number of emergent gaps in the measurable
economic understanding of these elements and suggest opportunities for
engaging decision makers in the business case for biophilic urbanism. The
Engaging Decision Makers in the Business Case for Biophilic Urbanism 13
Introduction
Internationally, the concept of ‘biophilic urbanism’, a term coined by
Professor Tim Beatley to refer to the use of natural elements as design
features in urban landscapes, is emerging as a key component in
addressing climate change challenges in rapidly growing urban contexts
(Beatley 2010). Achieving biophilic urbanism in urban environments is
facilitated through the use of ‘biophilic elements’; i.e. functional design
features (Beatley 2010). These elements can occur at three geographic
scales, from as extensive as urban parks and green streets at the city and
neighbourhood levels to as concentrated as green walls and pot plants at
the level of buildings (SBEnrc 2012). Each of the biophilic elements has a
few specific benefits, while a few other benefits are shared by all. Table 1-
1 summarises the benefits of a range of biophilic elements, with many
shared by all (SBEnrc 2012).
Studies suggest that a wide range of health benefits may arise from
daily views of nature (Beauchemin and Hays 1996; Benedetti et al. 2001;
Elzayadi 2011; Marcus and Marni 1995). The seminal work of Roger
Ulrich in 1984, which found faster rates of recovery in hospital patients
with views of nature compared to those without, laid a strong empirical
base for this research (Ulrich 1984). More recently, a 2012 report by
Terrapin Bright Green discussed how such benefits of nature might affect
building occupants, considering in particular employees in the workplace
(Terrapin Bright Green 2012). Their report discussed benefits of biophilia
in reducing stress, anxiety and absenteeism as well as enhancing
productivity and overall employee well-being. These studies, however,
still lack economic rigour.
Reviewing this emerging field, it is evident that economic understanding
of biophilic elements and their interaction with the built environment
remains limited. Within this context, this paper will discuss a number of
gaps in economic data. In considering how to articulate the economics of
biophilic urbanism, as the current understanding is ineffective, this paper
also highlights a gap in understanding what decision makers need in order
to make investment decisions regarding the use of biophilic elements.
Drawing on existing literature, as well as six case studies developed by the
authors and two stakeholder engagement workshops conducted in 2011 for
the Sustainable Built Environment National Research Centre (SBEnrc;
SBEnrc Stakeholder Workshop 2011), the authors discuss emergent needs
14 Chapter One
Methods
According to Kaplan and Duchon (1988), the use of multiple methods
allows for cross-validation, or triangulation, of findings from different
sources and data; enhancing the robustness of findings. For this reason,
this paper draws from three different qualitative interpretations and
analyses—literature review, case studies and workshops. These methods
are described in the following paragraphs.
The literature review method was used to provide background context
of the available information on biophilic urbanism and economics (what is
so?). This is due to researcher’s assumption that knowledge accumulates
and that future research can build on what has been done previously. This
sheds light on what the missing gaps in the literature are (what is
missing?). Once the existing literature and gaps have been identified using
this qualitative technique, an integrative literature review followed, which
involved drawing on the existing context to distil insights to provide the
literature review with an added depth that is informative and relevant.
These emerging insights dictated the subsequent method, case study
exploration, which aimed to dig deeper into the enquiry (what is the key
question?). Six case studies (Berlin, Singapore, Chicago, Toronto
Brisbane and Portland), were selected based on research conducted by the
broader research project for the Sustainable Built Environment national
research centre, which identified the successful mainstreaming of biophilic
elements within these cities (SBEnrc 2012). A number of economic
analysis related questions ensured consistent evaluation of all case studies,
providing insights that can inform future use of biophilic elements. The
sample for the literature review and case studies included journal articles,
books, industry and government reports and online pages.
Semi-structured interviews with two to three participants, identified
from the case study exploration based on their involvement in application
of biophilic elements in their respective city, were then conducted.
Questions or key topic areas from the case study exploration emerged.
These were asked or discussed to provide comprehension or validation of
findings from the literature review and case studies. The use of semi-
structured interviews allowed the interviewer to enquire more deeply into
topics of particular interest that emerged during each interview. To
enhance the validity of the interview process, the responses given by
interviewees were summarised and repeated back to the interviewee to
confirm that the information has been interpreted correctly and to allow
room for further clarification if necessary.
16 Chapter One
The paper also draws from two stakeholder workshops for SBEnrc
involving over 25 participants in Perth and Brisbane. The workshops were
based on the methodology of ‘Collective Social Learning’, created by
Emeritus Professor Valerie Brown, to guide participants through a process
to consider first their vision for a biophilic city and the aspects that enable
and disable achieving such vision. Following this, a brainstorm was
undertaken with each workshop group, to inform the research team’s
consideration of the various elements of an economic consideration of
both direct and in-direct economic benefits and costs of the use of
biophilic elements in cities and other urban areas.
Indirect benefits
Unquantifiable benefits: Whilst some benefits, such as stormwater
management and energy savings, are easily quantified, others are not.
Social and aesthetic benefits have been notoriously difficult to translate
into monetary terms. Such benefits include education, community
connectivity, happiness, improved health and well-being, among others
that may not yet be recognised (Terrapin Bright Green 2012). Whilst these
benefits’ financial returns may not be easily recognised, at times they can
be the most significant (Alex Versluis, pers. comm.). This was most
evident in a green roof project on a YMCA building in Toronto, Canada,
where community involvement instigated a series of ongoing benefits
(City of Toronto 2011). Some of the benefits included revitalising an
Engaging Decision Makers in the Business Case for Biophilic Urbanism 17
Multiplier Effect
In the case studies, biophilic elements were initially used to address a
particularly prominent challenge(s) facing the city. Once added to a
building, neighbourhood or city and when explored further, these biophilic
elements appeared to also positively reduce other negative externalities.
This suggests that biophilic elements provide positive multiplier effects,
however these are as yet only quantified and explored to a limited degree.
For instance, the serious problems of stormwater runoff in Portland
and the rising costs of traditional facilities was the first trigger for
alternative solutions. Portland city determined that the overall costs of
stormwater management could be reduced through the addition of green
infrastructure to stormwater management plans (ENTRIX 2010). These
green infrastructures, or biophilic elements, are now being retrofitted
throughout Portland under the Grey to Green (G2G) initiative, and include
green roofs, green urban space and Green Streets (among others). The city
of Portland has subsequently explored the broader benefits in terms of
health, well-being and liveability. The results indicated positive impacts
on physical and mental health, property value and crime rates (among
other, ENTRIX 2010). In a similar context, the rising issues of urban heat
18 Chapter One
Split Incentives
Whilst identifying the positive multiplier effect could strengthen the
business case for biophilic urbanism in cities, the issue of ‘split incentives’
may make it unfavourable for an investor. This is because the investor in a
1
The authors of this study note that due to some research limitations, the findings
from this study should be treated as indicative rather than conclusive.
Engaging Decision Makers in the Business Case for Biophilic Urbanism 19
biophilic element may not necessarily directly reap the benefits. Hence,
this potentially impedes financial returns that reduce the attractiveness for
private property owners (SBEnrc Stakeholder Workshop 2011). For
instance, a green roof retrofitted by a building owner will not necessarily
enjoy the full suite of benefits this provides, as building occupants within
proximity enjoy views of this rooftop and incur benefits such as stress
relief, and enhanced productivity, among others. Recognising and
exploring this limitation could help minimise this barrier by identifying
opportunities to link back the benefits to an investor.
Emergent
Opportunity in addressing gap
gaps
Government incentives
Results from the two stakeholder engagements revealed that financial
incentives are a crucial avenue to push the biophilic urbanism agenda
forward. This was reiterated in the case study findings. Brisbane
government, for instance, has introduced the ‘Green Door’ mechanism,
which will accelerate decisions for development proposals that are
identified to be among the most sustainable in Queensland (DLGP 2011).
This Green Door “fast track” incentive is designed to encourage
sustainable development by expediting applications through the often long
and complex development assessment system. As sustainable designs
occasionally incur high initial costs, particularly given the lack of
economies of scales in the green feature industry, motivation was required
to engage community members.
Financial incentives were identified as crucial for property owners. The
high initial cost of a biophilic feature as well as the split incentive issue
discussed earlier can impede their uptake. Hence, the limited benefits to
the building owner for green roofs and green walls may not be sufficient
for them to do this on their own accord. Discounted incentive was also
found in some of the cities explored. Most North American cities charge
property owners separately for stormwater runoff, enabling them to then
receive a discount where stormwater was managed onsite, principally
through the use of biophilic elements (ENTRIX 2010; Sustainable
Technologies 2005). These schemes raise awareness about the costs of
Engaging Decision Makers in the Business Case for Biophilic Urbanism 21
What’s so
The two workshops also highlighted a priority for decision makers to
comprehend the current understanding or ‘what’s so’ of biophilic
urbanism. Capturing what is already known in the literature or what can be
learned from others was expressed as imperative. Learning from others
illustrates lessons in terms of successful application as well as highlighting
errors that can be avoided. These also outline the benefits experienced
from their application. These known benefits include: reducing energy
consumption, reducing heat island effects (such as reducing urban heating
from concrete and pavements open to solar radiation that will heat
buildings and vehicles), enhancing urban biodiversity that may provide
greater tourist attraction and greater levels of well-being, improving
resilience to natural disasters and extreme weather conditions, improved
health and healing outcomes, improving the experience of those visiting
and working in urban areas and public buildings, providing learning
opportunities in terms of local flora and fauna and responding to pressures
related to densification and revitalisation of cities (SBEnrc 2012). Hence
an opportunity arises in exploring examples from around the world,
conduct feasibility tests to present economic, environmental and social
benefits.
What can be
New wealth of opportunities highlighting what is possible with
biophilic urbanism was also distinguished as a priority in the SBEnrc
workshops. This can be in the form of a local demonstration project with
the findings presenting accurate and appropriate data in terms of the
environmental, social and economic benefits. A political champion is also
important to encourage demonstration projects. This was apparent in
Chicago and Portland where costs and benefits of the natural installation
were communicated effectively to the public through demonstration projects
(Chicago Loop Alliance 2011; ESTRIX 2010). These demonstration
22 Chapter One
projects were publicly accessible; hence the public could directly appreciate
the benefits.
Retrofitting schools with a green roof or green wall was expressed as a
beneficial case study as it has the potential to provide dual purposes of
being a case study and an educational facility. The results not only shed
light on the quantitative benefits, but also on aesthetic and social benefits
such as community connectivity, education, enhanced productivity
(SBEnrc Stakeholder Workshops 2011). Collecting local data is also
significant as aspects such as climate, demographics, infrastructure and
government play a pertinent role in biophilic urbanism. Local exploration
to capture the successes is important for cities to gain confidence to pursue
a project further and to mainstream it wider. As biophilic urbanism is still
at its infant stage, data is generally limited and will need to be expanded to
have appropriate figures to present to decision makers to make informed
decisions and to appropriately apply biophilic elements to cities worldwide.
A summary of the emergent priorities in engaging decision makers
have been captured in Table 1-3. It demonstrates the need to further
strengthen these gaps.
Emergent
Opportunity in addressing gap
priorities
Government Opportunity to explore incentives such as green door ‘fast
policies tracks’ development application processes; financial incentives
or discounted incentives
‘What can be’? Opportunity to present new wealth knowledge to shed light on
what is possible with biophilic urbanism.
Opportunity to present local data to capture the successes to
facilitate understanding and confidence in biophilic urbanism.
Conclusion
Appreciating the emergent gaps in quantifying the full suite of benefits
that arise from biophilic urbanism and that the conventional model of
producing knowledge in relative isolation from other actors in society is
ineffective, this paper highlighted these gaps in economic knowledge and
suggested opportunities for engaging decision makers. The economic gaps
Engaging Decision Makers in the Business Case for Biophilic Urbanism 23
References
Adamowicz, W., and T. Beckley. 1998. “In Search of Forest Resource
Values of Indigenous Peoples: are Non-Market Valuation Techniques
applicable?” Society and Natural Resources 11(1): 51–66. doi:
10.1080/08941929809381061.
Banting, D., H. Doshi, J. Li, P. Missios, A. Au, B. A. Currie, and M.
Verrati. 2005. Report on the Environmental Benefits and Costs of
Green Roof Technology for the City of Toronto. Toronto: Ryerson
University.
Beatley, T. 2010. Biophilic Cities, Integrating Nature into Urban Design
and Planning. Washington: Island Press.
Beauchemin, K. M., and P. Hays. 1996. “Sunny Hospital Rooms Expedite
Recovery.” Journal of Affective Disorders 40(1–2): 49–51.
Benedetti, F., C. Colombo, B. Barbini, E. Campori, and E. Smeraldi. 2001.
“Morning Sunlight Reduces Length of Hospitalization in Bipolar
Depression.” Journal of Affective Disorders 62(3): 221–223. doi:
10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00149-X.
Chicago Loop Alliance. 2011. “Loop Economic Study and Impact
Report.” Accessed March 07, 2014.
www.thesullivancenter.com/pdfs/2011_Loop_Economic_Study_FINA
L.pdf.
City of Toronto. 2011. “Ecoroof Case Study - Metro Central YMCA.”
Accessed August 05, 2013.
www.toronto.ca/livegreen/downloads/ecoroof_ymca.pdf.
DLGP. 2011. “Green Door, Department of Local Government and
Planning, Queensland Government, Australia.” Accessed December
05, 2011. dlgp.qld.gov.au/development-applications/green-door.html.
Elzeyadi, I. 2011. Daylighting-Bias and Biophilia: Quantifying the
Impacts of Daylight on Occupants Health. Washington, DC: USGBC
Press.
ENTRIX. (2010). Portland’s Green Infrastructure: Quantifying the
Health, Energy, and Community Liveability Benefits. ENTRIX:
Portland, Oregon.
Glaeser, E. L., B. I. Sacerdore, and J. A. Scheinkman. 2003. “The Social
Multiplier” Journal of the European Economic Association 1(2–3):
345-353. doi: 10.1162/154247603322390982.
Hajkowicz, S. A. 2008. “Supporting Multi-Stakeholder Environmental
Decisions” Journal of Environmental Management 88(4): 607–614.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.020.
Engaging Decision Makers in the Business Case for Biophilic Urbanism 25
Abstract
In cities, people spend a significant portion of their time indoors, much
of which is in office buildings. The quality and nature of these spaces have
the potential to be a strong determinant of people’s health and wellbeing.
There is a body of evidence that suggests experiences of nature increase
the rate of attention recovery, reduce stress, depression and anxiety, and
increase cognitive abilities. Further, the presence of nature inside buildings
28 Chapter Two
(such as pot plants and internal green walls) can improve indoor air
quality, potentially reducing illness and increasing cognitive function.
Urban design that integrates nature into the built environment to provide
these benefits, among others, is called ‘biophilic urbanism’ and is the
subject of growing international interest and research. The potential for
these benefits to increase worker productivity in office buildings is of
particular interest, as this could significantly increase the financial
performance of office building-based organisations. However, productivity
is a complex concept that is difficult to define; and affected by a multitude
of factors, which make it difficult to measure. This inability to quantify
productivity increases from investments in nature-experiences in office
buildings is currently a significant barrier to such investments.
Within this context, this paper considers opportunities for research to
explore the relationship between office-based nature experiences and
productivity, by reviewing existing research in this field and reflecting on
the authors’ own experiences. This review has a particular focus on the
importance of quantifying this link in order to encourage private property
owners to voluntarily integrate nature into buildings to provide city-wide
ecosystem service benefits. The paper begins with a contextual overview
of how biophilic urbanism can potentially increase worker productivity.
Existing methods of measuring and evaluating the performance of
biophilic urbanism within the context of office buildings are then
explored, along with a discussion of issues with such methods that are
currently limiting investment in biophilic urbanism to increase worker
productivity and wellbeing. This includes a summary of a survey within a
Perth office building to explore the impact of views of nature through a
window. Drawing on these insights, the paper makes recommendations
regarding opportunities for focusing future investigations to enhance
understanding of how biophilic urbanism can contribute to increased
wellbeing and productivity in office buildings.
This paper builds on work conducted as part of the Sustainable Built
Environment National Research Centre Project 1.5, Harnessing the
Potential of Biophilic Urbanism in Australia, which considered the role of
nature integrated into the built environment in responding to emerging
challenges of climate change, resource shortages and population pressures,
while providing a host of co-benefits to a range of stakeholders.
Introduction
Integrating nature into cities has been a long-held goal of city planners
and decision-makers. Many famous parks in cities around the world are
Enquiry into Biophilic Urbanism and Office Worker Productivity 29
Methodological considerations
Most studies considered use either an experimental or in-situ approach,
with fewer epidemiological studies of populations—none of which
specifically consider workplaces (see Error! Reference source not
found. for a summary of research designs, and Table 2-2 for research
methods). Across all approaches, there were concerns with some studies
about sample sizes, experimental procedures, and certain methodological
procedures. This review is presented with the intention of highlighting an
emerging discussion about productivity and experiences of nature, and
acknowledges these issues in the field.
Experimental studies were in constructed settings (i.e. not an actual
workplace), in which other variables could be better controlled for, to
allow comparison between control groups. Such studies demonstrate the
effect of various types of experiences of nature on emotional states, such
as viewing nature inside a building, through a window, or walking through
a natural setting; the effect on creative, repetitive, attention-demanding or
skilled tasks; biophysical responses and self-assessed preferences for
nature and evaluation of performance and workplace satisfaction. Such
approaches and methods target specific skills, tasks and responses in
controlled settings, which can make the studies less representative of
actual workplaces that are more complex, involve longer timeframes, and
a wider variety of skills and tasks.
Research design Common measures of productivity Advantages Selected methodological Examples
used challenges
32
In-situ studies: Self reported performance and Investigate real Highly difficult to control Fjeld et al, 1998;
Studies undertaken in satisfaction measures, including workplaces for other variables, and to Leather, et al, 1998;
real workplaces, stress, productivity, job satisfaction, where real establish a means of Kaplan, 1993;
where comparisons intention to quit, and physical workloads and evaluating ‘productivity’ Kaplan et al, 1988;
can be made between wellbeing. tasks apply, thus with real-world work Bringslimark,
workers with giving a more tasks, due to these Hartig and Patil,
different access to Job statistics, for example, billable realistic context generally being non- 2011
nature; or of the same hours, or number of sick days to the research. unitized and varying
workers before and taken. between workers and over
after a change in Observed behaviour, such as time.
access to nature. tendency to bring pictures of nature
in the office.
Laboratory/ Quantitative measurement of Variables can Unclear whether results Tennessen and
experimental studies: performance on tests of be more translate to real-world Cimprich, 1995;
Experimental studies concentration, creativity, accuracy effectively working environments. Ulrich, R.S. et al,
undertaken in etc. controlled for, 1991; Hartig et al,
artificial settings, in and Remaining uncertainty of 2003; Chang and
which performance Biophysical measures correlated to standardized the causes for findings, Chen, 2005;
on set tasks is certain emotional states, self- and unitized including the biological or Laumann, Gärling,
evaluated when the reported emotional states and sense tests can be psychological reasons for and Stormark, 2003;
level of access to of wellbeing, productivity, stress or conducted to which experiences of Lohr, Pearson-
nature is varied. other. provide nature appear to affect Mims and Goodwin,
comparable participants. 1996; Larsen, et al,
Self reported perceptions of
Chapter Two
conducted across correlate this to proximity to green various describe complex 2006; de Vries et al,
large populations space. Studies generally consider demographics, relationships between 2011; Richardson,
mapping physical and where participants live rather than longitudinal variables. et al, 2011; Mitchell
mental wellbeing where they work. None draw a link data available, and Popham, 2007
against proximity to between their findings, and and can No epidemiological
green space. productivity, although such a link consider studies found that
could be hypothesized. variables not specifically consider
possible in other office workers.
studies (such as
morbidity).
Table 2-1. Summary of research designs commonly used to assess the
Productivity evaluation methods Advantages Selected challenges of method Example studies
Standardised performance tests, Performance can be directly Unclear whether such tests recreate Tennessen and Cimprich,
often requiring directed attention, compared between control the experience of working in an 1995; Ulrich, et al. 1991;
creativity, or speed and accuracy. groups, and other variables office, with some suggesting that Hartig et al. 2003;
Performance on such tests can be controlled for. due to the shorter duration and Laumann, Gärling, and
compared across control groups, nature of the tasks, they do not. Stormark 2003; Berman
to determine statistically et al. 2008; Shibata and
significant differences. Suzuki 2002
Standardised tests of emotional Non-intrusive, comparison The relationship between emotional Larsen, et al. 1998;
states, such as evaluating levels possible between control states and productivity is not Berman et al. 2008
of stress or anxiety, generally groups. Tests have completely clear. Questions of
surveys or questionnaires generally been elsewhere transferability of the findings
completed by participants. verified, and are relatively (laboratory), or of controlling other
easy and quick to conduct. influencing variables (real-world).
Self-rating (using surveys, Relatively easy to conduct, Lack of objectivity in measuring Fjeld et al. 1998; Leather,
questionnaires or interviews) of can deal directly with the ‘productivity’ or other factors may et al. 1998; Kaplan 1993;
productivity, stress, notion of ‘productivity’. cause doubt about findings. Kaplan et al. 1988;
concentration, job satisfaction, People’s perception of their Respondents may give false Bringslimark, Hartig and
life satisfaction, satisfaction with experience may be a more responses if they believe an Patil 2011; Bringslimark,
views and/or the office space, relevant than an objective employer could see them, or have Hartig and Patil 2007;
intention to quit, experience of measure, e.g. satisfaction inaccurate assessment of their own Kaplan 2007
symptoms associated with being with light levels, rather than productivity.
in an office building, general an objective assessment of
health and wellbeing. light quality.
Bio-physical measures correlated Ability to measure changes A proxy measure, data does not Chang and Chen 2005;
with emotional states, including that participants themselves necessarily translate to impacts on Laumann, Gärling, and
blood pressure, blood volume may not be consciously productivity. Relatively intrusive Stormark 2003; Lohr,
pulse, electromyography, aware of, providing method, and thus difficult to Pearson-Mims and
electroencephalography, cardiac objective and comparable conduct in a real-life setting. Goodwin 1996
inter-beat interval. data.
Comparison of existing job Use real-life data from Measures are complex and Heschong 2003
impact of views of nature on workplace productivity.
statistics such as billable hours, workplaces and thus influenced by many factors, for
number of pages typed, length of ostensibly reflect actual instance people may take sick leave
phone calls in call-centres, and performance indicators. when not sick, and billable hours
number of sick days taken. may reflect changes in workload, or
employees’ motivation.
Observation of behavioural Investigates actual Shows preferences for certain Heerwagen and Orians,
Enquiry into Biophilic Urbanism and Office Worker Productivity
patterns, such as bringing plants behaviour in the workplace, scenery but not necessarily how this 1986; Biner et al. 1993;
into an office when window and is non-intrusive. influences productivity. Behaviour Bringslimark et al. 2011
views of nature are not available, may reflect other variables such as
preference for desks with social norms, or company policies
window views of nature, or and practices.
Table 2-2. Research methods commonly used to gather data on the
33
many other important variables that affect worker productivity, may not be
seeking natural spaces for breaks.
34 Chapter Two
Emotional state
Research has shown that experience of nature appears to foster more
positive emotions (Larson 1998; Hartig et al. 2003) although one study
found no effect (Shibata and Suzuki 2002). Studies show a faster and more
complete recovery from stress when watching natural settings (Ulrich
1991), lower job stress (Leather et al. 1998) and less nervous and anxious
with more plants and views of nature (Chang and Chen 2005).
Gaps in the knowledge: The degree to which this improved mental
state correlates with improved worker productivity or reduced labour
costs to businesses, or the amount of nature experience needed to produce
a given change in emotional state, is not clear. Again, the reasons why the
observed effects occur are not understood, although hypotheses exist.
There are some inconsistencies in results, which suggest that the
relationship between nature experience and emotion may be complex.
Conclusions
Productivity is a complex and difficult to define concept, and
influenced by many factors. Whilst unlikely to be a ‘silver bullet’, the
emerging consensus of research studies suggests that biophilic urbanism
has the potential to provide a range of benefits to office-building workers
that provide a precondition for productivity and could increase the
financial performance of their organisation. However, current limitations
in research approaches and methods are such that for a decision-maker in
an office-based organisation, there are still uncertainties about the pay-
back period of improving access to experiences of nature, how such
measures compare to other interventions to improve productivity, and
what kind and amount of nature experiences to prioritise. Reductionist
approaches seeking to isolate and quantify the impact of nature
experiences on workers may be ultimately unsuccessful in the complex
environment and nature of knowledge-based work. Despite these
challenges, there are a growing number of buildings that integrate nature
into, onto and around them. These pioneering efforts demonstrate that, for
a variety of reasons that are beyond the scope of this paper to explore,
Enquiry into Biophilic Urbanism and Office Worker Productivity 41
References
Beatley, T. 2009. “Biophilic Urbanism: Inviting Nature Back to Our
Communities and Into Our Lives.” William & Mary Environmental
Law and Policy Review 34(1): 209–238.
—. 2011. Biophilic Cities: Integrating Nature into Urban Design and
Planning. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Berman, M. G., J. Jonides, and S. Kaplan. 2008. “The Cognitive Benefits
of Interacting With Nature.” Psychological Science 19(12): 1207–
1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x.
Biner, P. M., D. L. Butler, T. E. Lovegrove, and R. L. Burns. 1993.
“Windowlessness in the Workplace: A Reexamination of the
Compensation Hypothesis.” Environment and Behavior 25(2), 205–
227. doi: 10.1177/0013916593252003.
Bringslimark, T., T. Hartig, and Patil, G. G. 2007. “Psychological Benefits
of Indoor Plants in Workplaces: Putting Experimental Results into
Context.” Journal of Horticultural Science, 42(3): 581–587.
Chang, C. Y., and P. K. Chen. 2005. “Human Response to Window Views
and Indoor Plants in the Workplace.” HortScience 40(5): 1354–1359.
City of Chicago. 2008. “Adding Green to Urban Design, A City for Us an
Future Generations.” Accessed March 07, 2014.
http://www.cityofchicago.org/content/dam/city/depts/zlup/Sustainable_
Development/Publications/Green_Urban_Design/GUD_booklet.pdf.
City of Melbourne. 2012. “Urban Forest Strategy, Making a Great City
Greener, 2012-2032.” Accessed March 07, 2014.
www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/Sustainability/UrbanForest/Documents/Ur
ban_Forest_Strategy.pdf.
42 Chapter Two
DUPUYTREN’S CONTRACTION.
Dupuytren’s contraction presents the most serious and insidious
appearance of slow but almost irresistible contraction of fibrous
elements which the human body presents. It is produced by
contraction of the palmar fascia, with its numerous minute
prolongations, rather than by flexor tendons. It is seen in the hands
of men who from the nature of their occupations are subject to
much irritation of the palmar surface. It begins nearly always in the
fourth or fifth fingers, but may spread to and involve all the digits
and even the thumb. The view held by Adams and others that it is a
chronic hyperplastic inflammation, with scar-tissue contraction of the
palmar fascia and of the adjoining connective and fatty tissue, which
does not involve them evenly, but only at certain points, is correct,
at least when small nodules may be felt in the palm which are the
precursors of the disease. Either hand may be affected, but
generally both are involved. It is found in from 1 to 2 per cent. of
those who depend upon their hands for their support. Deformity
may proceed to pressure dislocation and finally to ankylosis. Its
causation then is very obscure; it is rarely the result of definite
injury, but follows continued irritation of the surface. It seems to
have a local origin, and yet it is frequently associated with the gouty
diathesis to such an extent that the prolonged use of alkalies will
relieve some cases. The first significant sign of the condition is the
formation of small nodules in the palm of the hand, as stated, and
this usually precedes the finger contraction by a year or two.
Fig. 110 Fig. 111
LOCK OR TRIGGER-FINGER.
Lock or trigger-finger implies a peculiar obstruction to free
movement of the finger, which requires extra effort and then is
overcome quickly, as if a knot had been slipped through a small
opening. It is supposed to be due to a thickening of the tendon at
some point, as by a small fibroma, which becomes entangled along
the course of the sheath, through which it is moved with difficulty. It
is probably due to a local irritation, as in the case of Dupuytren’s
contraction. Injury to the tendon sheath may also produce a similar
condition.
Treatment.—Should it fail to respond to rest and massage the
sheath should be opened and the cause of the difficulty sought out
and removed.
HAMMER-TOE.
Hammer-toe produces deformity with more or less ankylosis. An
angle is formed between the first and second phalanges, and the tip
of the toe is made to bear more than its proportion of weight. This
deformity is in large degree due to the use of shoes which are too
short. In consequence there will develop over the protruding joint a
corn or bunion.
Treatment.
—Should the trouble come on in childhood the toes should be
fastened to a straight splint and shoes for a time abandoned, while
later they should be properly adapted to the needs of the case. In
troublesome cases complete excision of the involved joint gives
satisfactory results.
TENDOSYNOVITIS.
Acute inflammation of a tendon sheath is known as tendovaginitis
or tendosynovitis. It always implies an infection, and occurs about
the hands and feet. It is a frequent complication of felons. Many
felons begin in such a manner that it is difficult to decide which part
of the fibrous structures of the finger is first involved. Infection
having once occurred within a tendon sheath will travel rapidly until
it meets with a natural barrier. The frequency of these lesions makes
it important to recall here the anatomy of the tendon sheaths of the
hand. There is a common palmar tendon cavity, which connects with
the thumb and little finger and the space above the annular
ligament, but communication with the first, second, and third fingers
is ordinarily destroyed. This accounts for the apparent vagaries of
cases where infection beginning in the thumb spreads to the little
finger before the others are involved. It will also show the location
where incisions should be made.
Fig. 112
Shortening a tendon.
It was a great service, in which perhaps Gluck figured most
conspicuously, to show that when tendon ends could not be neatly
coapted an animal material could be interposed in such a way as to
serve as a trellis along which cells could group, or around which they
might organize, and thus gradually and finally become a part of the
complete tendinous cord. Silk and catgut have best served this
purpose, and new tendons have gradually formed around these
artificial substitutes, to the length of 10 Cm. In every fresh case
where there has been such loss of original structure as to justify a
measure of this kind, or in certain old cases where tendons have
long since sloughed away, it may be possible to resort to these
expedients.
It has been possible to transplant fresh tendons from the smaller
animals and to see them serve the same purpose in a satisfactory
manner.
Among these methods of tendoplasty is tendon grafting, by which
a part or all of the tendon of an active muscle is inserted into the
terminal portion of a paralyzed muscle and thus made to assume to
a greater or less extent the purpose and function of the latter; in
other words it assists in ingeniously diverting the activity and
direction of a given muscle to a purpose different from its original
intent. By this diversion a more equal or equable distribution of
muscle force is afforded the parts into which the affected muscles
are inserted. For its successful performance only those muscles
which are still active can be utilized. Among the simplest of cases
where this expedient can be used are those produced by traumatic
and peripheral paralyses, or traumatic loss of a given tendon or a set
of tendons. It is rarely to be practised as an emergency measure,
but as an expedient to be availed of later. It finds its greatest
usefulness in cases of long standing. It is equally applicable where
muscles and tendons have been divided by injury, or paralyzed by
injury to their nerve supply, as well as where deformities are
produced by chronic neurotic disturbance, by scars, by excessive
callus, etc. It proves equally serviceable in paralyses of spinal origin,
particularly those due to anterior poliomyelitis.
Tendon grafting will serve both as a substitute in cases of lost
function and as a provision against future deformity. In cases of the
ordinary paralyses of children, tendoplasty should be deferred for
several months after the occurrence of the paralysis. In the case of
growing children it is desirable not to wait too long, as other
objectionable features may present themselves. In the congenital
and hereditary paralyses and in conditions like athetosis or the
dystrophies of syringomyelia, meningocele, etc., also in such
conditions as habitual dislocations of the patella, much can be
accomplished by a carefully planned tendoplasty. It will be easily
seen then how wide a field of usefulness lies before one who
familiarizes himself with the recent technique of tendon surgery.
Fig. 124
Fig. 125
Transplantation of a portion of the anterior tibial tendon, into the bone or into the
opposed group of muscles. (After Vulpius.)