Fimmu 14 1223514
Fimmu 14 1223514
Fimmu 14 1223514
Results: Twenty bMS and 15 aMS patients were included in this study. Sixty
percent (21/35) were female, and the mean age at the time of the first symptom
was 31.5 ± 9.45 years, with no statistical differences between groups. Median
follow-up time was 19.8 years (Interquartile range, IQR 15.9–24.6). The median
EDSS scores at the last follow-up were 1.5 and 7.5 in the bMS and the aMS group,
respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in the kFLC index
between the two groups (136.6 vs. 140.27, p=0.59). The IgG index was positive in
62.9% of patients (55% bMS vs. 73.3% aMS, p>0.05), and OCB was positive in
88.6% (90% bMS vs. 86.7% aMS, p>0.05). A significant positive correlation was
found between IgG and kFLC indices (rs = 0.85, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Given the absence of differences between the two groups with
opposite disease courses, it is unlikely that the kFLC index is a reliable and
powerful marker of long-term prognosis in MS.
KEYWORDS
whereas none in the bMS group developed this clinical form. With treatment, or had received corticosteroids in the past 6 months.
regard to corticosteroid treatment before the LP, 6 out of the 35 Figure 1 shows the kFLC quotient and kFCL index distribution
received corticosteroids before the LP, with the last dose being within boxplot. The differences between groups were not statistically
the last 3 months in 3 cases (34, 76, and 79 days before LP, significant, neither in the case of the kFLC index (p=0.59) nor in
respectively). In the remaining cases, the time interval exceeded 6 the case of the kFLC quotient (p=0.64). The calculation of ROC
months. The patient who received corticosteroids 34 days before is curves showed an AUC of 0.55 (IQR 0.35-0.75) for the kFLC index
part of the bMS group. None of the patients were on DMTs at the and an AUC of 0.55 (IQR 0.35-0.75) for the kFLC ratio.Biomarkers
time of the LP; however, one patient in the aMS group was receiving and comparison tests between groups are summarized in Table 2.
azathioprine treatment. The IgG index was positive in 62.9% of the patients (55% for
The clinical characteristics and comparison tests between the bMS vs. 73.3% for aMS, p>0.05), and the OCB was positive in 88.6%
groups are summarized in Table 1. (90% for bMS vs. 86.7% for aMS, p>0.05). A strong correlation was
found between the IgG and kFLC indices (rs = 0.85, p<0.001), as
shown in Figure 2.
3.2 Biomarkers and prognostic role of No correlation was found between the kFLC index and the time
kFLC index from MS onset to LP or between the kFLC index and the time from
previous relapse to LP.
The median kFLC index was slightly higher in the aMS group (74 The statistical analysis was repeated, excluding outliers in the
[IQR 37.61-332.45]) than in the bMS group (67.27 [IQR 30.23- bMS group, and the results were identical (data not shown).
159.41]). Similarly, the kFLC quotient was also higher in the aMS
group (0.39 [IQR 0.18-0.67] vs. 0.26 [IQR 0.15-0.52]). It’s worth
noting that in the bMS group, there were 2 outlier values for the kFLC 4 Discussion
index and 3 for the kFLC quotient. Notably, one of these outliers,
pertaining to both metrics, corresponds to the patient who had Recently, the kFLC index has been shown to be an alternative to
received corticotherapy 34 days prior to the lumbar puncture. The OCBs for the diagnosis of MS (17, 18). It is a marker that reflects
remaining outliers were not receiving any DMT, immunosuppressive intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis; however, unlike OCB, it is
Age at MS onset, years (mean ± SD) 31.5 ± 9.45 28.33 ± 4.29 35.74 ± 12.58 0.15
Total follow-up time, years [median (IQR)] 19.79 17.33 21.6 0.06
(15.89–24.57) (14.54–22.18) (18.55–24.77)
EDSS at last follow-up [median (IQR)] 2 (1.5–7.5) 1.5 (1.25–1.5) 7.5 (7–8) <0.001*
MSSS at last follow-up (mean ± SD) 3.8 ± 3.68 0.73 ± 0.41 7.89 ± 1.14 <0.001*
ARMSS score at last follow-up (mean ± SD) 4.71 ± 3.52 1.84 ± 0.95 8.54 ± 1.2 <0.001*
Age at LP, years (mean ± SD) 34.75 ± 9.08 31.05 ± 4.85 39.69 ± 11.06 0.018*
Time from MS onset to LP, months (median (IQR)) 29.96 24.21 39.49 0.3
(4.57–51.81) (3.53–42.45) (4.57-64.1)
Time from previous relapse to LP, months [median (IQR)] 2.99 2.14 3.48 0.14
(1.12–6.67) (0.92–5.8) (1.71–11.73)
MS, multiple sclerosis; SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range; ARR, annualized relapse rate; EDSS, expanded disability status scale; MSSS, multiple sclerosis severity score; ARMSS
score, age related multiple sclerosis severity score; DMT, disease-modifying treatment; SPMS, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis; LP, lumbar puncture.
*statistically significant.
A B
FIGURE 1
kFLC index (A) and kFLC quotient (B) distribution boxplots for benign and aggressive MS courses. A cases scatter plot is represented by dots and
outliers by triangles.
quantitative. This fact raises the question of whether, in addition to aimed at determining whether the FLC index is able to predict the
its role as a diagnostic marker, FLC could also have a role as a second relapse of the disease and when it occurs; in other words, the
prognostic marker, namely, whether high FLC index values are conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to clinically definite
related to a worse disease course. However, this hypothesis has not multiple sclerosis (26–29). The second group focused on
yet been fully explored. inflammatory activity in the early years (beyond the first relapse)
This study aimed to determine the utility of the kFLC index in and cumulative disability during this period.
long-term prognosis. The rationale for its design was based on the Focusing on the second group, the oldest studies used the
fact that if the kFLC index is a useful and reliable prognostic absolute value of KFLC in the CSF or CSF/serum FLC quotient as
biomarker, it should be able to differentiate patients with MS with a metric of FLC and ELISA and radioimmunoassay techniques for
opposite courses. No differences were observed between the two its measurement (30–32).
groups. Therefore, our results suggest that this index is not a useful Although they used a different metric, it is worth mentioning a
clinical marker for long-term prognosis. study that demonstrated the relationship between the kFLC:LFLC
To date, some studies have assessed the relationship between ratio and EDSS at 5 years of follow-up (33).
the FLC index and prognosis. These can be divided into two main Among the most recent studies that used the kFLC index and
groups based on their objectives. The first group includes studies modern turbidimetry or nephelometry methods, three found no
kFLC, kappa free light chains; IQR, interquartile range; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; IgG, immunoglobulin G; OCB, oligoclonal bands.
Ethics statement and The Binding Site for providing the reagents needed to perform
the kFLC analysis. Study supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics (PT20/00171) and Xarxa de Bancs de Tumors de Catalunya,
Committee of the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge (reference sponsored by Pla Director d’Oncologia de Catalunya (XBTC). We
PR134/22). The studies were conducted in accordance with the thank the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for their
local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants institutional support.
provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Conflict of interest
Author contributions
PA-P, LB, EM, IL, AM-V, LR-P, AM-Y and SM-Y received
PA-P contributed to the collection, analysis, and interpretation of
honoraria for participating on advisory boards and for
the data and writing of the report. LG-S, FM, BU, VM, and MF
collaborations as consultants and scientific communications; they
contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data, and
also received research support as well as funding for travel and
correction of the report. IL contributed to data collection. AM-V,
congress expenses from Roche, Biogen Idec, Novartis, TEVA,
EM, and LR-P contributed to the data collection and report correction.
Merck, Genzyme, Sanofi, Bayer, Almirall, and Celgene.
AM-Y and SM-Y contributed to the study design, data interpretation,
LG-S and VM received funding for travel and congress expenses
and report correction. LB contributed to the study design; collection,
from The Binding Site.
analysis, and interpretation of data; and correction of the report. All
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted
authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that
could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Funding
The authors declare that no financial support was received for Publisher’s note
the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors
and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated
Acknowledgments organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the
reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or
The authors thank Susana Pobla for the technical support. We claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or
would also like to thank all patients who participated in this study endorsed by the publisher.
References
1. Dobson R, Giovannoni G. Multiple sclerosis-a review. Eur J Neurol (2019) 26:27– 10. Obermeier B, Lovato L, Mentele R, Brück W, Forne I, Imhof A, et al. Related B cell
40. doi: 10.1111/ene.13819 clones that populate the CSF and CNS of patients with multiple sclerosis produce CSF
2. Paul A, Comabella M, Gandhi R. Biomarkers in multiple sclerosis. Cold Spring immunoglobulin. J Neuroimmunol (2011) 233(2):245–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.01.010
Harb Perspect Med (2019) 9(3). doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a029058 11. Greenfield AL, Hauser SL. B-cell therapy for multiple sclerosis: entering an era.
3. Tintore M, Rovira À, Rı́o J, Otero-Romero S, Arrambide G, Tur C, et al. Defining Ann Neurol (2018) 83(1):13–26. doi: 10.1002/ana.25119
high, medium and low impact prognostic factors for developing multiple sclerosis. 12. Hannam-Harris AC, Smith JL. Free immunoglobulin light chain synthesis by
Brain (2015) 138(Pt 7):1863–74. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv105 human foetal liver and cord blood lymphocytes. Immunology (1981) 43(3):417–23.
4. Harding K, Williams O, Willis M, Hrastelj J, Rimmer A, Joseph F, et al. Clinical 13. Hopper JE, Papagiannes E. Evidence by radioimmunoassay that mitogen-
outcomes of escalation vs early intensive disease-modifying therapy in patients with activated human blood mononuclear cells secrete significant amounts of light chain
multiple sclerosis. JAMA Neurol (2019) 76(5):536–41. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4905 Ig unassociated with heavy chain. Cell Immunol (1986) 101(1):122–31. doi: 10.1016/
5. Ontaneda D, Tallantyre E, Kalincik T, Planchon SM, Evangelou N. Early highly 0008-8749(86)90191-7
effective versus escalation treatment approaches in relapsing multiple sclerosis. Pers 14. Abe M, Goto T, Kosaka M, Wolfenbarger D, Weiss DT, Solomon A. Differences
View Lancet Neurol (2019) 18:973–80. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30151-6 in kappa to lambda (k:l) ratios of serum and urinary free light chains. Clin Exp
6. Weideman AM, Tapia-Maltos MA, Johnson K, Greenwood M, Bielekova B. Meta- Immunol (1998) 111(2):457–62. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00487.x
analysis of the age-dependent efficacy of multiple sclerosis treatments. Front Neurol 15. Bradwell AR, Carr-Smith HD, Mead GP, Tang LX, Showell PJ, Drayson MT,
(2017) 8(NOV). doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00577 et al. Highly sensitive, automated immunoassay for immunoglobulin free light chains in
7. Genain CP, Hauser SL. Allergic encephalomyelitis in common marmosets: serum and urine. Clin Chem (2001) 47(4):673–80. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/47.4.673
pathogenesis of a multiple sclerosis-like lesion. METHODS: A Companion to 16. Ramsden DB. Multiple sclerosis: assay of free immunoglobulin light chains. Ann
Methods Enzymol (1996) 10:420–34. doi: 10.1006/meth.1996.0120 Clin Biochem (2017) 54(1):5–13. doi: 10.1177/0004563216652175
8. Ray A, Mann MK, Basu S, Dittel BN. A case for regulatory B cells in controlling 17. Arrambide G, Espejo C, Carbonell-Mirabent P, Dieli-Crimi R, Rodrı́guez-
the severity of autoimmune-mediated inflammation in experimental autoimmune Barranco M, Castillo M, et al. The kappa free light chain index and oligoclonal
encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol (2011) 230(2):1–9. doi: bands have a similar role in the McDonald criteria. Brain (2022) 145(11):3931–42.
10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.10.037 doi: 10.1093/brain/awac220
9. Lassmann H. Pathology and disease mechanisms in different stages of multiple 18. Hegen H, Walde J, Berek K, Arrambide G, Gnanapavan S, Kaplan B, et al.
sclerosis ☆. J Neurol Sci (2013) 333:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.010 Cerebrospinal fluid kappa free light chains for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: A
systematic review and meta-analysis. Mult Scler J (2022) 29(2):169–81. doi: 10.1177/ 30. Rudick RA, Namey M, Fischer J, Medendorp SV, Boyle S. Multiple sclerosis
13524585221134213 progression in a natural history study: Predictive value of cerebrospinal fluid free kappa
19. Mené ndez-Valladares P, Garcı́a-Sá nchez MI, Cuadri Benı́tez P, Lucas M, Adorna light chains. Multiple Sclerosis (1995) 1(3):150–5. doi: 10.1177/135245859500100303
Martı́nez M, Carranco Galá n V, et al. Free kappa light chains in cerebrospinal fluid as a 31. Rinker JR, Trinkaus K, Cross AH. Elevated CSF free kappa light chains correlate
biomarker to assess risk conversion to multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin with disability prognosis in multiple sclerosis. Neurology (2006) 67(7):1288–90. doi:
(2015) 1:1–9. doi: 10.1177/2055217315620935 10.1212/01.wnl.0000238107.31364.21
20. Vecchio D, Crespi I, Virgilio E, Naldi P, Campisi MP, Serino R, et al. Kappa free 32. Makshakov G, Nazarov V, Kochetova O, Surkova E, Lapin S, Evdoshenko E.
light chains could predict early disease course in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Diagnostic and prognostic value of the cerebrospinal fluid concentration of
Disord (2019) 30(January):81–4. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.02.001 immunoglobulin free light chains in clinically isolated syndrome with conversion to
21. Salavisa M, Paixão P, Ladeira AF, Mendes A, Correia AS, Viana JF, et al. Prognostic mul tip le s clerosis . Pl oS One (2 015 ) 10 (1 1) :e 014 337 5. doi : 10 .137 1/
value of kappa free light chains determination in first-ever multiple sclerosis relapse. J journal.pone.0143375
Neuroimmunol (2020) 347(May):577355. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2020.577355 33. Rathbone E, Durant L, Kinsella J, Parker AR, Hassan-Smith G, Douglas MR,
22. Castillo-Villalba J, Gil-Perotı́n S, Gasque-Rubio R, Cubas-Nuñez L, Carratalà- et al. Cerebrospinal fluid immunoglobulin light chain ratios predict disease progression
Boscà S, Alcalá C, et al. High levels of cerebrospinal fluid kappa free light chains relate in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry (2018) 89(10):1044–9. doi: 10.1136/
to igM intrathecal synthesis and might have prognostic implications in relapsing jnnp-2018-317947
multiple sclerosis. Front Immunol (2022) 13:1. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.827738 34. Presslauer S, Milosavljevic D, Huebl W, Parigger S, Schneider-Koch G, Bruecke
23. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. T. Kappa free light chains: Diagnostic and prognostic relevance in MS and CIS. PloS
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol One (2014) 9(2):e89945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089945
(2018) 17:162–73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 35. Cutellè C, Balducci C, Cereda D, Fusco ML, Iacobucci D, Perugini J, et al. K
24. Confavreux C, Compston DAS, Hommes R, Mcdonald WI, Thompson AJ. index utility as diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in the assessment of patients with
EDMUS, a European database for multiple sclerosis. Neurosurgery Psychiatry (1992) suspected Multiple Sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol (2022) 373:577992. doi: 10.1016/
55:671–6. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.55.8.671 j.jneuroim.2022.577992
25. Lorscheider J, Buzzard K, Jokubaitis V, Spelman T, Havrdova E, Horakova D, 36. Cepok S, Rosche B, Grummel V, Vogel F, Zhou D, Sayn J, et al. Short-lived
et al. Defining secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain (2016) 139(9):2395–405. plasma blasts are the main B cell effector subset during the course of multiple sclerosis.
doi: 10.1093/brain/aww173 Brain (2005) 128(Pt 7):1667–76. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh486
26. Senel M, Tumani H, Lauda F, Presslauer S, Mojib-Yezdani R, Otto M, et al. 37. Correale J, Gaitá n MI, Ysrraelit MC, Fiol MP. Progressive multiple sclerosis:
Cerebrospinal fluid immunoglobulin kappa light chain in clinically isolated syndrome from pathogenic mechanisms to treatment. Brain (2017) 140(3):527–46. doi: 10.1093/
and multiple sclerosis. PloS One (2014) 9(4):e88680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0088680 brain/aww258
27. Voortman MM, Stojakovic T, Pirpamer L, Jehna M, Langkammer C, Scharnagl 38. Maack T, Johnson V, Kau ST, Figueired J, Sigulem D. Renal filtration, transport,
H, et al. Prognostic value of free light chains lambda and kappa in early multiple and metabolism of low-molecular-weight proteins: A review. Kidney Int (1979) 16:70.
sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis (2017) 23(11):1496–505. doi: 10.1177/1352458516681503 doi: 10.1038/ki.1979.128
28. Gaetani L, Di Carlo M, Brachelente G, Valletta F, Eusebi P, Mancini A, et al. 39. Hutchison CA, Harding S, Hewins P, Mead GP, Townsend J, Bradwell AR, et al.
Cerebrospinal fluid free light chains compared to oligoclonal bands as biomarkers in Quantitative assessment of serum and urinary polyclonal free light chains in patients
multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimmunol [Internet] (2020) 339:577108. doi: 10.1016/ with chronic kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol (2008) 3(6):1684. doi: 10.2215/
j.jneuroim.2019.577108 CJN.02290508
29. Berek K, Bsteh G, Auer M, Di Pauli F, Grams A, Milosavljevic D, et al. Kappa- 40. Basile U, Gulli F, Gragnani L, Napodano C, Pocino K, Rapaccini GL, et al. Free
free light chains in CSF predict early multiple sclerosis disease activity. Neurology(R) light chains: Eclectic multipurpose biomarker. J Immunol Methods (2017) 451
neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm (2021) 8(4):e1005. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000001005 (April):11–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2017.09.005