Audit Planning Management and Evidence Notes
Audit Planning Management and Evidence Notes
Audit Planning Management and Evidence Notes
• Define audit planning and explain its objectives, advantages scope and timing.
• Discuss the sources of information on client’s nature of business.
• Explain the purposes of the audit planning memorandum and the audit program.
• Explain audit planning procedures and the problems in developing and
implementing an audit plan.
• Explain quality control procedures at an individual audit level and their
objectives.
• appreciate the need for working papers, their advantages and disadvantages.
planning refers to developing a general strategy and a detailed approach for expected
nature, timing and extent of the audit. The auditor should plan his work to enable him
conduct an effective audit in an efficient and timely manner. The form and nature of
the planning required from audit will be affected by the size and complexity of the
organization, the commercial environment in which it operates and the methods of
processing transactions and reporting requirements to which the organization is
subject.
INTRODUCTION
aAudit planning is a vital stage of the audit process covered under iSa 300. Every
audit should be planned so that the engagement will be performed in an effective
manner. The main aim is to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level.
Audit planning covers the development of an overall plan for the expected coverage
and conduct of the audit.
Quality control refers to the various policies and procedures put in place by the
auditor to ensure that all audits conducted by the audit firm meet the quality standards
set out by the accounting profession and the firm’s own quality standards.
Working papers -evidence is recorded in the form working papers of which are
prepared by the auditor or obtained during the audit. The working papers are retained
by the auditors in connection with the performance of an audit.
Audit planning is essential for every audit to direct the work of the auditor for him to
allocate resources. it is therefore inevitable to conduct an audit effectively without an
audit plan.
audit planning covers the development of an overall plan for the expected coverage
and conduct of the audit. The audit plan is recorded in a planning memorandum.
An audit programme is then developed which shows the nature, timing and extent
of audit procedures to be applied at every level of audit testing. in order to plan his
work adequately, the auditor needs to understand the nature of client’s business, its
organization, its methods of operation and the industry in which it operates. This is to
enable the auditor appreciate which events and transactions are likely to have
significant effect on the financial statements.
iSa 315 states that the auditor should obtain an understanding of the information
system, including the related business processes, relevant to financial reporting.
The planning memorandum sets out the audit approach, how, whom and when each
item in financial statements will be audited timing requirements of the audit and staff
usage with time budget for each set of audit work. it generally contains the following.
a summary of terms of engagement required to set out the nature of the audit
work.
a job timetable giving provisional dates of the timing of the audit.
records of any changes about the client since last audit e.g. changes in
management structure.
background information about the client.
Details of key client contacts.
Extent of reliance expected on internal control system.
Audit Programme
Ensure that the person performing the reconciliations signed and dated the
reconciliations.
Ensure the reconciliations were done by the person proposed at the appropriate
time and the supervisor signed the reconciliation as evidence of his review.
audit assistant.
1. a company may have many clients with similar year ends. This will make
allocation of time and audit staff difficult.
2. abrupt changes in the client’s business will call for more audit time outside the
planned time. This especially happens when the client converts from manual
accounting system to a computerized system such changes weaken the internal
control system in the short term and call for more audit time than was previously
planned for.
4. Staff turnover in an audit firm. This inevitably interferes with the audit plan
because it gives rise to unplanned staff shortages.
When planning the audit of a new client, the auditor should carry out the following
procedures.
1. Carry out a preliminary review of the client. This will involve obtaining a
good understanding of the nature of the client’s business.
2. Discuss with management to obtain an understanding of the management
structure and a general feel of the current operating circumstances of the client
and any factors that affect client’s accounting and internal control system.
3. Communicate with previous auditor of the client and obtain from him all the
information that is relevant to the audit of the new client.
1. Seek to obtain a preliminary understanding of the nature of the clients accounting
and internal control system. This assists determine the extent to which the auditor
will rely on the client’s internal control system.
2. Consider any accounting standards and legislations that could have an impact on
the audit of the new client.
3. The audit senior should check the nature and timing of reports and other
communications of the client so that such timings can be accommodated in the
audit plan. E.g. dates of the aGm, stock takes and when management reports are
ready.
4. The audit senior should determine the number of audit staff required, their
experience and any special skills required and the timing of the audit visit.
5. prepare an audit planning memorandum that summarizes the scope of the work
under the engagement and the strategy to be followed to meet the client’s needs.
The quality of the work carried out by the auditor is of fundamental importance. This
is especially so in the light of potential of being sued for negligence. The auditor
remains personally responsible for the work he carries out and the opinion he issues.
The only way of reducing the risk of being sued is to ensure that work performed by
the firm is of the highest quality possible.
Quality control refers to the various policies and procedures put in place by the
auditor to ensure that all audits conducted by the audit firm meet the quality standards
set out by the accounting profession and the firm’s own quality standards.
2. Skill and competence. The audit firm should be staffed by personnel who have
attained and maintained the technical standards and professional competence
required to enable them fulfill their responsibilities with due care.
The firm’s general quality control policies and procedures should be communicated to
its personnel in a manner that provides reasonable assurance that the policies are
understood and implemented.
1. Delegation. audit work should be delegated by the reporting partner to staff who
have appropriate experience, training, proficiency and independence. This will
provide reasonable assurance that such work will be performed with due care by
persons having he required technical competence.
The auditor must record or document all the information gathered as audit evidence in
forming an opinion on the financial statements. The evidence is recorded in the form
of working papers which are prepared by the auditor or obtained during the audit.
The working papers are retained by the auditors in connection with the performance
of an audit. audit working papers should always be sufficiently complete and detailed
to enable an inexperienced auditor having no previous connection to the audit to
ascertain work that was performed to support the conclusion reached. The auditor
The reporting partner needs to satisfy himself that the work delegated by him has been
properly performed. This is only possible by reviewing detailed working papers
prepared by the audit staff who perform the work. This also aids in supervision and
review of work done by audit assistants.
4. if sued for negligence, the auditor can use the working papers as evidence for
work done.
5. Working papers can be used for training of audit staff. They contain audit
programme and specimen schedules which audit assistants can refer to when
conducting the audit.
Auditing guidelines do not define precisely, the form of working papers but it
indicates what might typically be contained therein. This may include:
This contains documents and matters of continuing importance which are required for
more than one financial period.The specific information therin includes the following:
This file contains matters pertinent to the current year’s audit and contains:
1) a copy of the accounts being audited which must be signed by the directors
2) A file index showing contents of the file.
3) A detailed description of internal control system in form of flow charts,
questionnaires or
4) any other form of suitable documentation.
5) audit programme showing the audit objective and planned audit procedures for
each of the areas to be audited.
6) a schedule of each item in the balance sheet showing the balance at beginning of
the year, changes during the year and balance at the end of the year. The schedule
also shows details of work performed on each balance, the result and conclusion
made.
7) A schedule of the items in the profit and loss account. It will show the details of
work
8) performed on each balance, the result and conclusion reached.
9) a check list for compliance with statutory disclosure requirements and accounting
standards.
10) a record of questions raised during the audit and those raised in the
previous audit.
1) This improves the efficiency with which working papers are prepared because
they will be used for many clients
2) They act on guidelines for instructions to audit staff and facilitate delegation of
work.
3) They provide a means to control the quality of audit work by ensuring that
minimum quality standards are maintained.
4) Ensures that all relevant issues in the audit are addressed.
Disadvantages
Chapter Objectives
By the end of this chapter, the student should be well versed on the following:
1. Explain the following concepts
ii. reliability of audit evidence
iii. obtaining audit evidence
iv. management assertions
v. methods of obtaining audit evidence
vi. audit sampling
vii. representations by management
Introduction
KEY TERMS
Audit evidence - refers to the information obtained by the auditor in arriving at the
conclusions
on which the audit opinion on the financial statements is based.
Substantive procedures - these are audit tests carried out to test the accuracy and
validity of the accounting records.
Reliability of audit evidence- this refers to the credibility of the source of the
evidence
Audit Evidence
This is covered under ISA 500 which to establishes standards and provide guidance
on what constitutes audit evidence in an audit of financial statements, the quantity and
quality of audit evidence to be obtained, and the audit procedures that auditors use for
obtaining that audit evidence.
Definition audit evidence: This refers to the information obtained by the auditor in
arriving at the conclusions on which audit opinion on the financial statements is based.
Audit evidence comprises of source documents and accounting records underlying the
financial statements. The accounting records generally include:
5. minutes of meetings
6. Confirmations form third parties
7. analysis reports.
8. Comparable data about competitors.
9. Control annuals.
10. information obtained by auditor from audit procedure such as observation
and enquiries.
The sources and amount of evidence needed to achieve the required level of assurance
is determined by the auditor’s judgment. The auditor’s judgment will be influenced by
the materiality of item being examined, the relevance and reliability of evidence
available from each source and cost involved in obtaining it. audit evidence is
obtained through an appropriate mix of tests of controls and substantive procedures
where internal control system is considered weak; evidence may be obtained entirely
from substantive procedures.
Substantive tests are procedures carried out to test the accuracy and validity of
accounting records. They are of two types i.e. analytical review procedure and test of
detail.
By approving the financial statements, the directors are making representations about
the information therein. These assertions may fall into the following categories:
1. Occurrence—transactions and events that have been recorded have occurred and
pertain to the entity.
2. Completeness—all transactions and events that should have been recorded have
been recorded.
2. Completeness—all assets and liabilities that should have been recorded have been
recorded.
4.Valuation and allocation —assets and liabilities are included in the financial
statements at appropriate amounts.
This is the analysis of relationships such as between items of financial data to identify
consistency and predicted patterns or significant fluctuations, unexpected
relationships and results of investigations thereof.
To determine the amount of difference from expectation that can be accepted without
investigation.
Comparison of company’s account balances or ratios with the expected.
Investigate and evaluate significant ratio differences from the expectation
1. Developing an expectation.
Information derived from similar firms in the same industry e.g. industry
wageaverage.
Relationships between financial and non financial data e.g. wage expenses and a
number of employees. in establishing these relationships, the auditor may use
shillings amount, physical quantities ratios or percentages.
• horizontal analysis. This involves review of client’s ratios and trends over time
• Cross sectional analysis. This involves comparisons of ratios of similar firms at a
given
The amount of acceptable difference between the expectation and the financial
statements balance that can be accepted without investigation is determined primarily
by the amount that is considered to be a material misstatement However; this amount
must be consistent with the degree of assurance from the procedure. When trend or
ratio analysis is used, the auditor typically uses professional judgment to specify an
absolute amount of difference or percentage difference that will result into
investigation.
3. Comparison of the account balance or ratio with the expected balance or ratio.
once the auditor has determined the expectation and amount of acceptable difference,
he makes
the actual comparison to determine where significant difference lies.
The auditor must investigate any significant differences and his expectation and the
client’s financial statements balance or ratio to determine whether they represent
misstatements. This involves reconsidering the methods and factors used in
developing the expectation. inquiry to management can be useful in this regard.
management explanations however must be ordinary be supported with other audit
evidence. if the explanations are not tallying with other audit evidence, the editor will
often be required to expand his tests of related financial amounts to determine
whether or not they are materially misstated.
iSas require the application of analytical procedures at the planning and overall
review stages of the audit. The auditor may also decide to use them during the audit
on substantive tests to provide evidence as to the reasonableness of specific account
balances. Analytical procedures performed in planning the audit are used to determine
the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures that will be used to obtain evidence
about specific accounts. They are also used in understanding the client’s business at
the planning stage.
Analytical procedures must be used as part of the overall review stage of an audit to
assist the auditor in assessing the adequacy of the evidence gathered and the validity
of conclusions reached. At the final review stage of an audit, the analytical procedures
generally include reviewing the financial statements and re-computing ratios if
necessary to identify any unusual or unexpected balance or that have not been
previously identified and explained.
Where the auditors are not required to use analytical procedure as substantive tests,
they are usually most efficient tests of certain assertions .e.g. performing analytical
Sufficiency is the measure of the quantity of the evidence, while the appropriateness
is the measure of the quality (reliability & relevance) of the evidence. This applies to
both tests of controls and substantive procedures.
The auditor needs to obtain sufficient, relevant and reliable evidence to form a
reasonable basis for his opinion on the financial statements. His judgement of
sufficiency will be influenced by such factors as:
b) Appropriate- relevance
C ) Appropriate – reliable
F. Documentation
An audit plan is the formulation of the general strategy for the audit, which sets out
the direction for the audit, describes the expected scope and conduct of the audit and
provides guidance for the development of the audit programme. This plan is in the
form of a written document. Included will be:
1.The discussion among the audit team concerning the susceptibility of the financial
statements to material misstatements including any key decisions reached;
2.Key elements of the understanding gained of the entity;
3.The identified and assessed risks of material misstatement;
4.Significant risks identified and related controls evaluated;
5.The overall responses to address the risks of material misstatements;
6.The nature, extent and timing of further audit procedures linked to the assessed risks
at the assertion level;
7.If the auditors have relied on evidence about the effectiveness of controls
from previous audits, conclusions about how this is appropriate.
Initial visit
This visit is essential in building up a background about the client company in order
to assist in the detailed planning of the audit.
The auditor will use techniques such as inquiry, observation and review of
documentation in order to understand details about the company such as:
Interim Visit
Ideally this visit should take place close to the year end. The purpose of this visit is to
carry out detailed tests on the client’s accounting and internal controls with a view to
establishing those controls on which you can rely. Where controls are operating
effectively, restricted substantive procedures need only be carried out. Where
controls are ineffective in practice, more extensive substantive tests will need to be
carried out. At this stage, if any weaknesses in controls have been noted, it may be
appropriate to draft a letter to the client management.
Final Visit
This visit will take place after the accounting year end. On this visit, the detailed
substantive procedures will be carried out in order to substantiate the figures in the
accounting records and subsequently, the financial statements. After an overall
review of the financial statements, the auditor will be able to assess whether
sufficient and appropriate evidence has been obtained in order to draw reasonable
conclusions so that an opinion can be expressed on the financial statements.
a) Oral representations.
Throughout an audit the auditors ask many questions to the officials and employees of
Client Company. oral inquires are made on an endless range of topics from the
location of records and document, reasons for unusual account procedures and
probability of collecting overdue accounts receivable. in making inquires, the auditor
should consider the knowledge, objectivity, experience, responsibility and
qualifications of individuals being questioned and use carefully structured questions
to address relevant issues. Client replies should be carefully evaluated as appropriate
and followed up with additional questions.
b) Written representations.
The auditor must also obtain written representations from the client in accordance
with provisions of iSa 580. at conclusion of the audit, the auditor obtains from the
client a written representation letter. This letter summarizes the most important oral
representations made by management during the audit. Many specific items are
included in this representation letter e.g. management represents that all liabilities
known to exist are reflected the financial statements. The representations generally
fall into the following broad categories;
• All accounting records, financial data and minutes of director’s meetings have
been
made available to the auditor.
• The financial statements are complete and were prepared in conformity with
generally
accepted accounting principles.
• management believes that adjusting entries brought to the attention by the
auditor and not recorded are not material individually or collectively.
• all items requiring disclosures such as contingencies, illegal acts and related
parties transactions have been properly disclosed.
iSa 580 requires the auditor to obtain representations letter on every engagement and
provide suggestions as to its form, content and guidance on how it is to be used as
audit evidence and actions to be taken if client refuses to provide representations.
These letters are dated as of the date of the auditor’s report ordinarily the last day of
field work and are usually signed by both the client chief executive officer and the
chief accountant. A client representations letter should never be used as a substitute
for performing other audit procedures. The financial statements already constitute
written representations by the client hence representation letter does little more than
assert that the original representations were correct.
The auditor should obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the work of the
expert is adequate for the purpose of the audit.
in deciding whether to use the work of an expert the auditor should consider
1) The skills and competence of the expert. The auditor should consider this by
examining the expert’s professional qualifications, licenses or membership of an
appropriate professional body. The experience and reputation of the expert in the
field in which the auditor is seeking evidence is very important.
2) Objectivity and independence of the expert.. The auditor should consider
whether the expert is independent from the client. The risk of independence being
impaired increases where the expert is employed by the client. in such cases he
owes his loyalty to the client because there exists a financial relationship.
3) The source of the data used by the expert in arriving at his opinion. if the source
of the data can be regarded as reliable, then the auditor can reasonably use the
work of the expert as audit evidence.
4) The assumptions and methods used. The auditor should consider whether the
methods used by the expert in arriving at his opinion are appropriate to the
circumstances. he should also obtain an understanding of those assumptions and
methods to determine that they are reasonable based on the auditor’s knowledge
of the client’s business and
5) the results of his other audit procedures.