Ppgdta DC
Ppgdta DC
Ppgdta DC
Popular methodology
Drawbacks:
- Critics pointed out that strict adherence to Direct Method principles was
often counterproductive since teachers were required to go to great lengths to
avoid using the native tongue when sometimes a simple brief explanation in the
student's native tongue would have been a more efficient route to
comprehension.
1.3. Audiolingualism
• Theory of language:
-Language was viewed as a system of structurally related elements for the
encoding of meaning, the elements being phonemes, morphemes, words,
structures, and sentence types.
-Language skills are learned more effectively if the items to be learned in the
target language are presented in spoken form before they are seen in written
form
-The meanings that the words of a language have for the native speaker can be
learned only in a linguistic and cultural context and not in isolation
• Objectives
• The syllabus: The language skills are taught in the order of listening, speaking,
reading, and writing.
-Learners play a reactive role by responding to stimuli and thus have little
control over the content, pace, or style of learning.
• one of the things that CLT embraces within its family is the concept of how language
is used.
• A major strand of CLT centers around the essential belief that if students are
involved in meaning-focused communicative tasks, then 'language learning will take
care of itself.
Approach
• Theory of language:
Design
Characteristic features:
- CLT is learner-centered.
-Learner: negotiator
-Teacher:
• Other roles assumed for teachers are needs analyst, counselor, and group process
manager
• Limited attention to accuracy: CLT prioritizes fluency and communication over accuracy,
which means that errors are tolerated to some extent to promote natural and spontaneous
language production.
• Teacher's role and expertise: CLT requires teachers to act as facilitators and create
opportunities for communication rather than being the primary source of language input.
Critics argue that this places a heavy burden on teachers to design and manage
communicative activities effectively, requiring a high level of expertise and experience.
• The Pre-task stage: The teacher explores the topic with the class and may
highlight useful words and phrases, helping the students to understand the task
instructions. The students may hear a recording of other people doing the same
task.
• The Task cycle stage: The students perform the task in pairs or small groups
while the teacher monitors from a distance. The students plan how they will tell
the rest of the class what they did and how it went, and they then report on the
task, either orally or in writing, and/or compare notes on what has happened.
• The Language focus stage: The students examine and discuss specific features
of any listening or reading text that they have looked at for the task and/or the
teacher may conduct some form of practice of specific language features that the
task has provoked and offer 'offline correction.
1.6. Presentation, practice, and production (PPP)
• T presents an item of language in a clear context to get across (get it) its
meaning (through a text, a situation, a dialogue, etc.)
• Students are then asked to complete a controlled practice stage, where they
may have to repeat target items through choral and individual drilling, fill gaps,
or match halves of sentences
• Students are given a communication task such as a role-play and are expected
to produce the target language and use any other language that has already
been learned and is suitable for completing
1.7. Total Physical Response (TPR)
Some advantages:
It is a lot of fun, students enjoy it and it can be a real stirrer in the class. It
lifts the pace and the mood.
It is very memorable. It helps students to remember phrases or words.
It is good for kinaesthetic learners who need to be active in the class.
It can be used in large or small classes. It doesn't matter how many students
you have as long as you are prepared to take the lead, the students will
follow.
It works well with mixed-ability classes. The physical actions get across the
meaning effectively so that all the students can understand and use the target
language.
It doesn't require a lot of preparation or materials. As long as you are clear
about what you want to practice (a rehearsal beforehand can help), it won't
take a lot of time to get ready.
It is very effective with teenagers and young learners.
It involves both left- and right-brained learning.
Some disadvantages:
Students who are not used to such things might find it embarrassing. This
can be the case initially but I have found that if the teacher is prepared to
perform the actions, the students feel happier about copying. Also, the
students are in groups and don't have to perform for the whole class. This
pleasure is reserved for the teacher.
It is only suitable for beginner levels.
While it is clear that it is far more useful at lower levels because the target
language lends itself to such activities I have also used it successfully with
Intermediate and Advanced levels. You need to adapt the language
accordingly.
You can't teach everything with it and if used a lot it would become
repetitive. I completely agree with this but it can be a successful and fun way
of changing the dynamics and pace of a lesson used in conjunction with
other methods and techniques.
- "The Lexical Approach implies a decreased role for sentence grammar, at least
until post-intermediate levels. In contrast, it involves an increased role for word
grammar (collocation and cognates) and text grammar."
- The idea is that, rather than have students memorize lists of vocabulary, they
would learn commonly used phrases.
Benefits:
- Nonlinear recording formats (e.g., mind maps, word trees) are intrinsic to the Lexical
Approach.
Limitation: While the lexical approach can be a quick way for students to pick
up phrases, it doesn't foster much creativity. It can have the negative side effect of
limiting people's responses to safe fixed phrases
Manage classroom
1. Using the voice
-Variety
+ Teachers do not have to shout to be audible. Good voice projection is more important than
volume (though the two are, of course, connected). Speaking too softly or unpleasantly loudly
is both irritating and unhelpful for students.
+ In one particular situation, teachers often use very loud voices, and that is when they want
students to be quiet or stop doing something
+ It is worth pointing out that speaking quietly is often just as effective a way of getting the
student’s attention since, when they realize that you are talking, they will want to stop and
listen in case you are saying something important or interesting.
-Conservation
vary their voices throughout the day, avoiding shouting wherever possible, so that they
can conserve their vocal energy
2. Talking to students
-> Consider the kind of language that students are likely to understand.
-> Think about what to say to the students and how best to do it
+ use physical movements and gestures such as shrugging the shoulders for “who cares’ or
scratching the head to show puzzlement.
+ Many teachers also use gestures to demonstrate things like the past tense (pointing back
over their shoulders)
+ They use facial expressions to show emotions such as happiness and sadness
+ They mime to demonstrate (diễn đạt bằng hành động) actions such as opening a book or
filling a glass and drinking. Gesture, expression, and mime should become a natural adjunct to
the language we use, especially with students at lower levels.
3. Giving instruction
be consistent
demonstrate
be decisive
- It is important to check that the students have understood what they are being asked to do.
This can be achieved by:
asking a student to explain the activity after the teacher has given the instruction
getting someone to show the other people in class how the exercise works
Ask a student to translate the instructions into their mother tongue a check that they
have understood them.
+ Overuse of TTT is inappropriate because the more a teacher talks, the less chance there is
for the students to practice their speaking and other things such as reading and writing
If teachers know how to talk to students, if they know how to rough-tune their
language to the student’s level, then the students get a chance to hear language that is
certainly above their productive level, but which they can more or less understand.
Such comprehensive input- where students receive rough-tuned input in a relaxed and
unthreatening way- is an important feature in language acquisition
engage students with stories and interaction, using appropriate comprehensible input
will help them to understand and acquire the language
good teachers use their common sense and experience to get the balance right.
5. Using the L1
Once we have given instructions for an activity, we can ask students to repeat the
instructions back to us in the L1
where students need individual help or encouragement, the use of the L1 may have
very beneficial effects.
Using the students’ L1 may help them to see connections and differences between the
L1 and the L2 and, occasionally, the teacher’s use of the L1 may help them to
understand things that they are finding difficult to grasp.
Making use of the students’ L1 does not mean we should abandon the commitment to
creating an English environment. Although we have seen that the L1 can be used as an
enabling tool, English should predominate in an English lesson, especially where the
teacher is concerned since, as we have seen, he or she is the best provider of
comprehensible input that the students have got.
Teachers should try to get their students' agreement that overuse of their own language
means that they will have less chance to learn English
Teachers can make it clear by their behavior that they want to hear English. They can ignore
what students say in their own language.
Scanning the whole class will also help to focus everyone's attention on you.
- when an activity has finished and/or another one is about to start, it helps if teachers make
this clear through the way they behave and the things they say. It helps students if they are
made aware of the end of something and the beginning of what is coming next.
- For such changes of direction to be effective, the teacher first needs to get the students'
attention.
speak loudly, saying things like, 'Thank you… now can I have your attention,
please?'
It is suitable for activities where the teacher is acting as a controller, good for giving
explanations and instructions, presenting material
It is the preferred class style in many educational settings where students and teachers
feel secure when the whole class is working in lockstep and under the direct authority
of the teacher
It favors the group rather than the individual. Everyone is forced to do the same thing
at the same time and the same pace.
Individual students do not have much of a chance to say anything on their own.
Many students are disinclined (dislike) to participate in front of the whole class since
to do so brings with it the risk of public failure.
-It may not encourage students to take responsibility for their learning. Whole-class teaching
favours the transmission of knowledge from teacher to student rather than having students
discover things or research things for themselves.
-It is not the best way to organize communicative language teaching or specifically task-based
sequences. Communication between individuals is more difficult in a group of 20/30 than it is
in groups of four or five. In smaller groups, it is easier to share material, speak quietly and
less formally, and make good eye contact. All of these contribute to successful task resolution.
The teacher has a clear view of all the students and the students can all see the teacher.
Lecturing is easier
Orderly rows allow the teacher to work with the whole class
Some activities are especially suited to orderly rows: explaining a grammar point,
watching a video/ DVD or a PowerPoint (or other computer-based) presentation, or
using the board or an overhead projector.
In a horseshoe, the teacher will probably be at the open end of the arrangement
In a circle, the teacher's position - where the board is situated - is less dominating.
With horseshoe and circle seating, the classroom is a more intimate place, and the
potential for students to share feelings and information through talking, eye contact, or
expressive body movements (eyebrow-raising, shoulder-shrugging, etc.) is far greater
than when they are sitting in rows.
Separate tables
In some classrooms students sit in groups at separate tables, whether they are working
as a whole class, in groups or pairs.
Separate tables are more difficult to 'teach to' in whole-group activities, depending, of
course, on the size of the room and the group.
It can be a way of restoring peace and tranquility to a noisy and chaotic classroom.
It does not help a class develop a sense of belonging. It does not encourage
cooperation in which students may be able to help and motivate each other.
When combined with giving individual students different tasks, it means a great deal
more thought and materials preparation than whole-class teaching involves. When we
work with individual students as a tutor or resources, it takes much more time than
interacting with the whole class.
allows teachers time to work with one or two pairs while the other students continue
working.
promotes cooperation, helps the classroom to become a more relaxed and friendly
place, and allows Ss to share responsibility.
Disadvantages
Students in pairs can often veer away from the point of an exercise; chances of
misbehavior are greater (distraction)
not always popular with students, many of whom feel they would rather relate to the
teacher as individuals than interact with another learner who may be just as
linguistically weak as they are.