Shreya Peeyush Chapters Published
Shreya Peeyush Chapters Published
Shreya Peeyush Chapters Published
Abstract Recently core–shell types of particles are found to be used for the improve-
ment of semiconductor efficiency, information storage, optoelectronics, catalysis
and quantum dots, etc. ZnS and ZnO are II–VI group semiconductors with a wide
band gap. Both materials show prominent applications in photocatalytic activity and
solar cells. In the present investigations an effort has been made to synthesize Zinc
Oxide@ Zinc Sulfide core–shell by a facile water bath route. X-ray diffraction data
revealed the presence of ZnO in high percentage with small amount of ZnS phase.
W–H plot and size–strain plot was used to evaluate the crystallite size and strain
for the as synthesized material. UV–Vis spectroscopy technique was used to record
the absorption. On analysis of absorption data revealed a band gap of 3.2 eV and
refractive index of 2.34 for the material. Microstructural investigations carried out
by TEM show rod and oval shaped core–shell particles having average particle size
with a length of 250 nm and breath of 150 nm. The shell thickness estimated from
TEM image is about 25 nm. Elemental compositional analysis of the as synthesized
material depicted the presence of zinc, oxide and sulfide.
1 Introduction
The key to reach the source of unlimited power is renewable energy. One of the
promising aspects for unlimited energy is solar energy. Researchers are doing tremen-
dous amount of work to create a material which can provide us with optimal output
[1–3]. Novel material like Zinc Oxide (ZnO) Molybdenum di-sulfide (MoS2 ) and
Zinc Sulfide (ZnS) are good examples for solar materials [4, 5]. The problem we
face with novel materials was that they had higher photo exciton energy than there
nanocomposite counterparts [6]. Nanocomposite materials such as a core–shell have
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 419
B. Sethuraman et al. (eds.), Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Lecture Notes
in Mechanical Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2349-6_38
420 P. Phogat et al.
solved that problem. Core–shell nanomaterials are the type of materials in which one
of the materials (core) is covered by another material (shell) and they form a layered
structure. Core–shell nanoparticles (CSNs) are a class of nanostructured materials
that have recently received increased attention owing to their interesting properties
and broad range of applications in catalysis, biology, materials chemistry and sensors.
In core–shell particles-based drug delivery systems either the drug can be encapsu-
lated or adsorbed onto the shell surface. The shell interacts with the drug via a
specific functional group or by electrostatic stabilization method. When it comes
in contact with the biological system, it directs the drug. In the present investigations
an effort has been made to study the parameters of these core–shell nanoparticles
for their further use in solar cell applications. With high surface to volume ratio and
low photo exciton energy level they became the new face of nanocomposites [7, 8].
For the application of solar energy ZnO and ZnS are proved to be good for anode
materials [9, 10]. ZnO is a semiconductor with a band gap of 3.37 eV. The novel
material show applications like piezoelectric, water splitting and solar cells [11, 12].
ZnS is also a semiconductor with a band gap of 3.54 eV. ZnS shows applications
in light emitting diode (LED’s), catalyst, anode material for solar cells, water waste
treatment and water splitting applications [13, 14]. Both ZnO and ZnS exhibits two
main structures, one of them is cubic in nature and known as zinc blend. The other one
is called wurtzite which is hexagonal in structure. Core–shell materials are preferred
over any other due to their property of high surface area and higher stability [15–17].
By adding a shell to a material it improves thermal stability and dispersibility of
core material [18]. ZnO@ZnS core–shell structures have already been studied for
their property of water splitting, photocatalytic application and hydrogen production
mainly [19, 20]. They show enhanced UV absorbance and many dye studies have
been performed on this unique material [16, 21]. Earlier studies revealed that the
core–shell nanomaterials synthesized using this technique show the formation of
dense shells [22], however the present study shows the formation of porous nature of
shell which is better for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. As shell being porous, the mate-
rial will exhibit properties of core as well as the shell. The present study shows the
synthesis of ZnO@ZnS core–shell through facile stirring without inducing any other
impurities in the sample. The reaction through which core–shell are synthesized is
a sacrificial synthesis in which the core material sacrifices its upper layer to create a
shell which is also called galvanic replacement [20]. Identification of phases of the as
synthesized material was carried out by using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) tech-
nique. Crystallite size and strain were calculated through Debyes Scherrer formula
and W–H plot, respectively. Optical properties and the band gap of the sample were
investigated using UV–Vis Spectroscopy. Microstructural study was done by using
transmission electron microscopes (TEM). Elemental compositional analysis was
carried by using energy dispersive spectrometer, an attachment to TEM.
Optical and Microstructural Study of Wide Band Gap ZnO@ZnS … 421
ZnO nanopowder of particle size in the range 10–30 nm with purity of 99.5% procured
from M/s Nanoshel. Sodium sulfide (Na2 S) was procured from M/s THOMAS
BAKER. Distilled water of 15Mega-Ohm resistance was used for cleaning and
synthesis purpose. All the solutions were prepared in distilled water only. Absolute
ethanol was used for cleaning and washing only.
3 Material Characterization
For XRD analysis X-ray diffractometer of PANalytical model X’pert PRO was
used in 2θ range of 10°–90° with Copper (Cu) Kα-radiation of λ = 1.5406 Å. For
optical analysis SHIMADZU UV-2600i, UV–Vis Photo spectrometer was used in
the source light range of 850–190 nm. Microstructural analysis was done on High
Resolution-Transmission Electron Microscopy (HR-TEM) with an attachment of
EDX of TALOS (THERMO SCIENTIFIC).
422 P. Phogat et al.
1 h2 k2 l2
For Cubic = + +
d2 a2 b2 c2
( )
1 4 h 2 + k 2 + hk l2
For Hexagonal 2 = 2
+ 2
d 3 a c
where d is interplaner-spacing in angstrom, hkl are planes and a, b, c are the lattice
parameters which are to be determined. Crystallographic parameters of both materials
can be seen Table 1.
Fig. 1 Rietveld analyzed data showing hkl values for ZnO@ZnS core–shell
Optical and Microstructural Study of Wide Band Gap ZnO@ZnS … 423
Crystallite Size and Strain. The XRD peaks thus obtained are signature of
different parameters such as crystallite size, micro strain and peak broadening.
Crystallite size was calculated by using well-known Debye Scherrer equation as
mentioned
Kλ
D=
βCosθ
where K is 0.9 and known as Scherrer constant, λ is the wavelength of X-ray source
(0.15406 nm), θ is known as Braggs angle and β is the value for Full Width at
Half Maximum, i.e., FWHM. Using these values average crystallite size (D) of this
particular material was calculated and found to be about 61 nm.
Williamson-Hall plot was used to find the size and strain of the material. As the
broadening of peak (can be denoted by β T ) is due to the effect of crystallites size
(β D ) and secondly on micro strain (β E ). Equation given below was used to calculate
crystallite size and micro strain.
Kλ
βT Cosθ = (ε × 4Sinθ ) +
D
where broadening of peak is given as βT, θ is known as Bragg’s angle, ε is average
lattice strain, K given by 0.9 and λ is the wavelength of XRD source also given
as 0.15406 nm. As from the equation we can compare slope and intercept (given in
Fig. 2) to find strain and crystallite size. The slope represents the strain in the material
and being negative it represents compression which is 0.00275. As for crystallite size
we compare intercept with Kλ/D to calculate D which comes to 16.5 nm which is
for the ZnS material as shell material crystallite size is very small for the material.
Crystallite size and lattice strain were calculated using size–strain plot (Fig. 3)
in which it is stated that profile is illustrated by strain through Gaussian function
and Crystallite size through Lorentzian function. The equation for size–strain plot is
given below.
Kλ ( 2 ) ∫2
(dhkl × βhkl × Cosθ )2 = × dhkl × βhkl × Cosθ +
t 4
424 P. Phogat et al.
The slope was equated to Kλ/t to calculate t which is average crystallite size.
The average crystallite size was found to be 66.9 nm. Whereas strain was calculated
by equating intercept to ε2 /4 which for the as synthesized material is 0.002158. As
synthesized powder was analyzed through X-ray diffractometer for the structure and
phase identification. The raw data of XRD was analyzed using Xpert High Score Plus
Optical and Microstructural Study of Wide Band Gap ZnO@ZnS … 425
software. Further data was smoothed by low pass filter to remove any data below
bas.
UV–Visible Spectroscopy (UV–Vis). UV–Vis spectroscopy is done through
diffusion reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), in which reflectance data is recorded in
the range of 850–190 nm. Using from Kubelka Munk theorem absorbance graph
was acquired. Figure 4a shows five absorbance peaks at 199.5, 204.5, 209, 306.5
and 362.5 nm. Among the five peaks, absorbance at 362.5 nm found to be maximum
showing that material has a potential for solar cell applications. For visible region
absorbance, a dye may be used with as synthesized ZnO@ZnS material to be appli-
cable in solar cell applications [22]. Tauc Plot of the as synthesized material was
plotted and band gap was calculated through linear fit as shown in Fig. 4b.
| |1
αhυ = A hυ − E g n
material which revealed that the core material is ZnO and shell material is ZnS.
TEM and HR-TEM images confirmed the formation of core–shell structure of the as
synthesized material ZnO@ZnS. Elemental compositional analysis of the same area
of material was carried out by using Energy Dispersive Spectrometer (EDS) which
showed the presence of zinc, oxygen and sulfur as depicted in Fig. 5f. Presence of
Optical and Microstructural Study of Wide Band Gap ZnO@ZnS … 427
a b c
200nm 50nm
100nm
d e f
Counts
2.00 1/nm 5nm
Energy(keV)
Fig. 5 a TEM image showing core–shell ZnO@ZnS b TEM image depicting porous shell around
the core at higher magnification. c TEM image showing shell thickness of ZnO@ZnS; d SEAED
pattern for ZnO@ ZnS, e high resolution TEM showing lattice fringes of core and shell of
ZnO@ZnS, f EDX pattern of core–shell ZnO@ZnS
oxygen along with zinc showed the presence of ZnO, whereas presence of sulfur
showed the ZnS existence which was also revealed in XRD pattern above.
4 Conclusion
ZnO@ZnS core–shell nanoparticles were synthesized using facile water bath route
for low cost synthesis. X-ray diffraction analysis reveals the presence of ZnO phase in
majority and ZnS in lower percentage. Crystallite size of the as synthesized material
was calculated using Debye–Scherrer equation; William-Hall plot and size–strain
plot revealed the crystallite size of the order 60–70 nm. The strain value was calcu-
lated and found to be 0.0025 approx. UV–Vis spectroscopy measurements showed
absorption in UV region with absorption peak at 362.5 nm and a band gap of 3.2 eV.
The refractive index of the as synthesized material was found to be 2.34. Microstruc-
tural investigation carried out using TEM shows core–shell formation with nanorods
morphology with a particle size of approx. 250 nm in lengths and 150 nm in breadth.
The shell thickness of the material was estimated nearly 25 nm. SEAD pattern confirm
the presence of ZnO and ZnS having polycrystalline nature. Elemental compositional
analysis of the material showed the presence of zinc, oxide and sulfur only. This study
of ZnO@ZnS core–shell material may be useful as anodic material for solar cells.
428 P. Phogat et al.
The material can also be used with organic dyes for Dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC)
applications.
References
1. Sharma D, Jha R, Kumar S (2016) Quantum dot sensitized solar cell: recent advances and
future perspectives in photoanode. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 155:294–322. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.062
2. Shi M et al (2019) ‘Bottom-up’ preparation of MoS2 quantum dots for tumor imaging and their
in vivo behavior study. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 516(4):1090–1096. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.bbrc.2019.06.162
3. Yadav SA, Khatri R, Jain N, Bhandari A, Puri NK (2023) Double zone thermal CVD and plasma
enhanced CVD systems for deposition of films/coatings with eminent conformal coverage
BT—advances in manufacturing technology and management, pp 273–283
4. Fang X, Wu L, Hu L (2011) ZnS nanostructure arrays: a developing material star. Adv Mater
23(5):585–598. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201003624
5. Zazueta-Raynaud A, Lopez-Delgado R, Pelayo-Ceja JE, Alvarez-Ramos ME, Ayon A (2017)
Utilization of down-shifting photo luminescent ZnO quantum dots on solar cells. Mater Res
Express 4(7). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/aa7824
6. Akbari M, Sharifnia S (2017) Synthesis of ZnS/ZnO nanocomposite through solution combus-
tion method for high rate photocatalytic conversion of CO2 and CH4 . Mater Lett 194:110–113.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2017.02.020
7. Ali S, Saleem S, Salman M, Khan M (2020) Synthesis, structural and optical properties of
ZnS–ZnO nanocomposites. Mater Chem Phys 248:122900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matche
mphys.2020.122900
8. Xie Q et al (2014) Yolk-shell ZnO–C microspheres with enhanced electrochemical performance
as anode material for lithium ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 125:659–665. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.electacta.2014.02.003
9. Chala S, Sengouga N, Yakuphanoğlu F, Rahmane S, Bdirina M, Karteri İ (2018) Extraction of
ZnO thin film parameters for modeling a ZnO/Si solar cell. Energy 164:871–880. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.035
10. Ummartyotin S, Infahsaeng Y (2016) A comprehensive review on ZnS: from synthesis to an
approach on solar cell. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.
2015.10.120
11. Wolcott A, Smith WA, Kuykendall TR, Zhao Y, Zhang JZ (2009) Photoelectrochemical study
of nanostructured Zno thin films for hydrogen generation from water splitting. Adv Funct Mater
19(12):1849–1856. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200801363
12. Kumar B, Kim SW (2012) Energy harvesting based on semiconducting piezoelectric ZnO
nanostructures. Nano Energy 1(3):342–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.02.001
13. Bhushan M, Jha R (2020) Surface activity correlations of mesoporous 3-D hierarchical
ZnS nanostructures for enhanced photo and electro catalytic performance. Appl Surf Sci
528:146988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146988
14. Kaur S, Sharma S, Umar A, Singh S, Mehta SK, Kansal SK (2017) Solar light driven enhanced
photocatalytic degradation of brilliant green dye based on ZnS quantum dots. Superlattices
Microstruct 103:365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2016.10.046
15. Liu S, Wang X, Zhao W, Wang K, Sang H, He Z (2013) Synthesis, characterization and enhanced
photocatalytic performance of Ag2S-coupled ZnO/ZnS core/shell nanorods. J Alloys Compd
568:84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.149
Optical and Microstructural Study of Wide Band Gap ZnO@ZnS … 429
16. Yang X et al (2020) Preparation of flower-like ZnO@ZnS core-shell structure enhances photo-
catalytic hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy 45(51):26967–26978. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.027
17. Sadollahkhani A, Kazeminezhad I, Lu J, Nur O, Hultman L, Willander M (2014) Synthesis,
structural characterization and photocatalytic application of ZnO@ZnS core-shell nanoparti-
cles. RSC Adv 4(70):36940–36950. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra05247a
18. El-Toni AM et al (2016) Design, synthesis and applications of core-shell, hollow core, and
nanorattle multifunctional nanostructures. Nanoscale 8(5):2510–2531. https://doi.org/10.1039/
c5nr07004j
19. Brayek A et al (2014) Structural and optical properties of ZnS/ZnO core/shell nanowires grown
on ITO glass. Mater Lett 129:142–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2014.04.192
20. Zhao H, Dong Y, Jiang P, Wu X, Wu R, Chen Y (2015) Facile preparation of a ZnS/ZnO
nanocomposite for robust sunlight photocatalytic H2 evolution from water. RSC Adv
5(9):6494–6500. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra13203c
21. Sookhakian M, Amin YM, Basirun WJ, Tajabadi MT, Kamarulzaman N (2014) Synthesis,
structural, and optical properties of type-II ZnO–ZnS core-shell nanostructure. J Lumin
145:244–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.07.032
22. Saleh SM (2019) ZnO nanospheres based simple hydrothermal route for photocatalytic degra-
dation of azo dye. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 211:141–147. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.saa.2018.11.065
Elevated Refractive Index of MoS2
Amorphous Nanoparticles
with a Reduced Band Gap Applicable
for Optoelectronics
Abstract The present work reports the synthesis of MoS2 nanoparticles via a facile
ultrasonication-assisted hydrothermal route. The presence of 2-H hexagonal phase
of MoS2 is analyzed by XRD which shows diffused and broad pattern revealing the
low crystallinity of the synthesized sample. The crystallite size as calculated using
different methods like Debye Scherrer equation, Williamson-Hall (W-H) and size
strain plots comes out to be around 140 nm and the strain is negative which shows
the compression in the material. The optical studies carried out by UV–vis shows
the absorbance in UV and visible region. Absorbance data revealed the band gap of
0.9 eV and refractive index of 3.48. The high value of the refractive index makes
it a promising candidate for optoelectronic applications. FESEM images shows the
aggregation of MoS2 sheets formed in pebble like particles of micron sizes. Elemental
compositional analysis of the corresponding area of the sample revealed the presence
of Mo and S. TEM images also revealed the aggregation of thin sheets and selected
area electron diffraction pattern (SAEDP) shows the amorphous nature of the as-
synthesized materials which is also in good agreement with the XRD data.
1 Introduction
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2023 431
B. Sethuraman et al. (eds.), Recent Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Lecture Notes
in Mechanical Engineering, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2349-6_39
432 Shreya et al.
of graphene baffled scientists and they try to find a solution to the above problem.
Initially, numerous efforts have been made to increase the bandgap of graphene
layers but changing its bandgap changed its properties as well, which doesn’t solve
the problem [5, 6]. Then, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) comes into the
picture as analogous materials with the semiconducting property and the exploration
of their applications in different fields including sensing, electronics, optical and
others starts.
TMDs are materials that have thickness comparable to graphene along with excep-
tional semiconductor properties. TMD layers consist of metal atoms, such as Molyb-
denum or Tungsten which is stuck between two layers of chalcogen atoms. The adja-
cent layers are bound together very weakly and thus layers can slide over each other
[7, 8]. This is the reason, why these materials are widely used for solid lubrication
too. They have hexagonal structures, which resemble the graphene. TMD monolayers
have direct bandgap [9, 10]. While for multilayer TMD, like bilayer or trilayer, the
bandgap is indirect. Thus, there is a need to separate monolayers from bulk.
MoS2 (as shown in Fig. 1) is vastly explored TMD due to its exceptional properties.
It has a 2-D layered structure similar to graphene. It has two possible structural forms,
2-H and 1-T in which 2-H shows semiconducting behavior. It shows cyclic stability
and has a high refractive index and thus a promising candidate for optoelectronic
applications [11]. A plenty of methods have been investigated in years to synthesize
MoS2 nanostructures including chemical vapor deposition (CVD), metal–organic
CVD (MOCVD), atomic layer deposition, vapor-phase synthesis, electrophoretic
deposition, solar ablation, etc. [12–15]. Most of these methods are expensive and
complex and thus the research of an inexpensive and simpler route is essential which
can give comparable high purity product. Our present work is devoted toward the
synthesis of 2-D MoS2 -based thin layers via economical and facile hydrothermal
route. The precursor solution is initially treated with ultrasonic waves for high reac-
tion rate and yield. The thin agglomerated sheets of MoS2 as formed show enhanced
refractive index which is generally found to be in the range 0.5–3.3 [16] and thus it
is considerable for optoelectronic applications.
2 Experimental Section
The list of chemicals and materials used to synthesize MoS2 is reported in Table 1. All
chemicals and reagents are of analytical grade and used without further purification.
The structural analysis of the as-synthesized material is carried out by X-ray diffrac-
tion technique (XRD) (PANalytical X’pert PRO facility) (Fig. 2). The diffused and
low-intensity broadened peaks indicate the low crystallinity and amorphous nature
of the material. The peaks are indexed to the hexagonal structure of MoS2 with ICDD
database 00-002-0132. The lattice parameters are calculated using the formula,
| ( )2 | 1
1 4( 2 ) 2 a
= h + k + hk + l
2
d2 3 c a2
434 Shreya et al.
Table 2 A comparison of
Lattice parameters ICDD database value Calculated value
calculated parameters of
MoS2 with standard values a (Å) 3.1500 3.0623
b (Å) 3.1500 3.0623
c (Å) 12.3000 17.0959
α (˚) 90 90
β (˚) 90 90
γ (˚) 120 120
where d is d-spacing, (hkl) are miller indices and a, b, c are lattice parameters.
A comparison of standard parameters with calculated values is presented in Table
2. The difference in the value of ‘c’ is due to the error in calculations because of
the amorphous nature of material and broad diffused XRD pattern. (002) and (100)
peaks correspond to the periodicity along the c- and a-direction, respectively. The
calculated values of lattice parameters confirm the nano-sized particles. Further, the
average crystallite size calculated using the Debye Scherrer equation is 147.5 nm.
Other methods utilized to estimate crystallite size and strain of the sample are
W-H and size strain plot (as shown in Fig. 3a and b). The intercept of the W-H plot
is 0.00103 and is used to calculate the crystallite size as per the following equation,
kλ
D=
intercept
where k = 0.9 and λ = 0.154 nm is the Scherrer constant and wavelength used to
irradiate the
( material,
) respectively. It gives the value of crystallite size as 134.6 nm.
The slope βcosθ
4sinθ
gives us the value of strain in the material which is −7.56 × 10−5 .
The negative sign in the strain value indicates the compression in the material.
The intercept and slope of the size strain plot are also used to calculate the
crystallite size and strain of the sample using the following relations,
Elevated Refractive Index of MoS2 Amorphous Nanoparticles … 435
Table 3 A comparison of
Methods Crystallite size (nm) Strain, e (×10−4 )
crystallite size and strain
calculated using different Debye Scherrer 147.5 –
methods equation
Williamson-Hall 134.6 −0.756
plot
Size strain plot 138.6 −10.66
kλ
crystallite size, t =
slope
/
strain, e = 4 ∗ intercept
Thus, the crystallite size calculated using the above formula comes out to be
138.6 nm. Moreover, the strain in the sample is estimated as −10.66 × 10−4 . A
comparison of crystallite size and strain calculated using different methods is shown
in Table 3.
The optical study of the sample is carried out by analyzing absorbance plot (as shown
in Fig. 4a) obtained by UV–vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu 2600i). A significant
absorbance is observed in UV and visible regions which makes it a good candidate
for optoelectronic applications. The absorbance data is further evaluated to get the
Tauc plot according to the following relation,
αhν γ = A(hν − E g )
436 Shreya et al.
Putting E g as 0.9 eV, the refractive index is found to be about 3.48. A high value
of refractive index makes it a suitable candidate for optoelectronic applications.
Fig. 5 a–c FESEM images at different magnifications d EDX pattern of the corresponding area of
the sample
4 Conclusions
Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to the vice chancellor, NSUT for providing the
essential resources required for the research. One of the authors, Shreya is also thankful to him for
providing financial support during the research work.
References
1. Zhen Z, Zhu H (2018) Structure and properties of Graphene. Graphene: Fabrication, Charac-
terizations, Properties and Applications, pp 1–12, Jan 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-
12-812651-6.00001-X
2. Shen H, Zhang L, Liu M, Zhang Z (2012) Biomedical applications of graphene. Theranostics
2(3):283. https://doi.org/10.7150/THNO.3642
3. Chung C, Kim YK, Shin D, Ryoo SR, Hong BH, Min DH (2013) Biomedical applications of
graphene and graphene oxide. Acc Chem Res 46(10):2211–2224. https://doi.org/10.1021/AR3
00159F/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/AR-2012-00159F_0019.GIF
4. Rani P, Jindal VK (2012) Designing band gap of graphene by B and N dopant atoms. RSC Adv
3(3):802–812. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RA22664B
5. Cao X et al (2016) Band gap opening of graphene by forming heterojunctions with the 2D
carbonitrides nitrogenated Holey Graphene, g-C3N4, and g-CN: electric field effect. J Phys
Chem C 120(20):11299–11305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b03308
6. Denis PA (2010) Band gap opening of monolayer and bilayer graphene doped with aluminium,
silicon, phosphorus, and sulfur. Chem Phys Lett 492(4–6):251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
cplett.2010.04.038
7. Manzeli S, Ovchinnikov D, Pasquier D, Yazyev Ov, Kis A (2017) 2D transition metal
dichalcogenides. Nat Rev Mater 2:8:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2017.33
Elevated Refractive Index of MoS2 Amorphous Nanoparticles … 439
8. Johari P, Shenoy VB (2012) Tuning the electronic properties of semiconducting transition metal
dichalcogenides by applying mechanical strains. ACS Nano 6(6):5449–5456. https://doi.org/
10.1021/NN301320R/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/NN-2012-01320R_0006.GIF
9. Lezama IG et al (2015) Indirect-to-direct band gap crossover in few-layer MoTe2. Nano Lett
15(4):2336–2342. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5045007
10. Komsa HP, Krasheninnikov Av (2013) Electronic structures and optical properties of realistic
transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures from first principles. Phys Rev B Condens
Matter Mater Phys 88(8):085318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.085318
11. Li X, Zhu H (2015) Two-dimensional MoS2 : properties, preparation, and applications. J
Materiomics 1(1):33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JMAT.2015.03.003
12. Bhakhar S, Patel NF, Pataniya PM, Gupta S, Solanki GK, Jha PK (2023) Investigation of
electron-phonon interaction in pure and indium doped MoS2 using temperature dependent
Raman Spectra. Surf Interf 36:102489. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SURFIN.2022.102489
13. Barbe T et al (2022) Synthesis of the elusive doublewall nanotubes and nanocones (horns) of
MoS2 via focused solar ablation. Adv Mater Interf 2201930. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMI.
202201930
14. Shreya AY, Khatri R, Jain N, Bhandari A, Puri NK (2023) Double zone thermal CVD and plasma
enhanced CVD systems for deposition of films/coatings with eminent conformal coverage, pp
273–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9523-0_31
15. Shreya AY, Puri NK (2023) Preliminary observations of synthesized WS2 and various synthesis
techniques for preparation of nanomaterials, pp 546–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-
9523-0_61
16. Ullah MS, Bin Yousuf AH, Es-Sakhi AD, Chowdhury MH (2018) Analysis of optical and
electronic properties of MoS2 for optoelectronics and FET applications. AIP Conf Proc 1957.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5034320