Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 42K views

    DOJ page 22

    Uploaded by

    KING 5 News
    Page 22 of the DOJ complaint summarizes alleged fraudulent activity by a Hanford contractor managers in failing to assign work, yet charging for full hours or work days.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    DOJ page 22

    Uploaded by

    KING 5 News
    42K views1 page
    Page 22 of the DOJ complaint summarizes alleged fraudulent activity by a Hanford contractor managers in failing to assign work, yet charging for full hours or work days.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Page 22 of the DOJ complaint summarizes alleged fraudulent activity by a Hanford contractor managers in failing to assign work, yet charging for full hours or work days.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    42K views1 page

    DOJ page 22

    Uploaded by

    KING 5 News
    Page 22 of the DOJ complaint summarizes alleged fraudulent activity by a Hanford contractor managers in failing to assign work, yet charging for full hours or work days.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 1
    57. Contrary to the HMIS written procedures, however, between August 17, 2020, and the present, HMIS and its employees, supervisors, and managers regularly engaged in a systemic fraudulent timecard scheme designed to fleece the DOE for their own benefit, 58. Between August 17, 2020, and the present, due to HMIS’s failure to appropriately plan and schedule fire protection work for its hourly employees to do, it was customary, accepted, and daily practice for HMIS hourly employees in the Fire Systems Maintenarce unit to experience significant idle time, during which they had no work to perform, and to nonetheless falsely record their full shifts to active change codes on tier timecards, falsely and fraudulently indicating that these hourly employees had performed work that they had not performed, in order to seek ‘and obtain reimbursement from DOE for the idle hours. These timecards, containing false statements and representations, were approved by supervisory HMIS employees who were or should have been aware that the timecards did not accurately reflect the work performed because of the extensive and unreasonable amount of idle time experienced by hourly workers on a daily or near daily basis 59. During this timeftame, HMIS eraft personnel, including the pipefitters and electricians responsible for fire systems maintenance at facilities across the entire Hanford Site, frecuently experienced significant ide time, where they had no work to perform. Severe! factors within the control of IMIS contributed to this idle [UNITED STATES’ COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION - 22

    You might also like