Methods_merged
Methods_merged
Methods_merged
The teacher takes a passage from a book. She asks each student to read a few
lines from the passage and translate those lines into their native language. Then
the teacher asks in the native language if they have any questions. Students ask
in the target language and the teacher explains in the native language. Next, the
students write answers to comprehension questions at the end of the excerpt.
The teacher then gives a list of words both new and familiar to the students
from the passage. Students give the native word for each of them. The class
does it together. If they do not know it, the teacher gives it. The teacher gives
some English words and directs the students to find their equivalent from the
passage. Grammar is taught deductively by teaching them the grammar rules.
Students memorize the grammar rules.
Chapter 3 The Direct Method
Since the GTM was not very effective in preparing students to communicate in
the target language effectively, the DM became more popular. The one basic
rule of this method is that ‘No translation is allowed’. It was called the Direct
Method because meaning is to be conveyed directly in the target language
through demonstration and visual aids, with no recourse to the students’
native language.
The students read aloud a passage in the target language, and the teacher
uses realia or pictures present in the immediate classroom environment to
help students understand the meaning. For instance, in the demo class, the
teacher points to a part of the map after each sentence is read. The teacher
uses the target language to ask students if they have a question. The
students use the target language to ask their questions. The teacher
answers the students’ questions by drawing on the whiteboard or giving
examples. The teacher asks questions about the map in the target
language. This is followed by the students reply in the target language and
also asking questions about the map. Teacher corrects a grammar error,
and also makes the students self-correct by asking the students to make a
choice. The grammar is taught inductively.
The teacher then begins asking questions and making statements about the
students in the classroom containing some grammatical elements. The
teacher then makes students do a textbook exercise. The teacher then
gives them a dictation exercise about something related to the lesson.
The follow up classes will review the content of the text, follow the
teacher’s instructions and fill in blank maps with the features, practice
pronunciation of certain words, write a paragraph related to the content
taught, discuss a proverb and talk about the target language culture.
Chpt 4 The Audio-Lingual Method
Students listen to the teacher presenting a new dialogue knowing that they will be
expected to memorize the dialogue the teacher is introducing. The teacher uses only
the target language and actions to convey meaning. She also uses pictures and
realia. The native language is not used. The teacher models a dialogue between two
people and then repeats the dialogue delivery. The teacher makes students repeat
after her several times. Uses a backward build-up drill when students are stuck. The
teacher makes them stop and provides a model if they are straying from the model.
The teacher initiates a chain drill with lines from the dialogue where the teacher
does a part of the dialogue with all the students one by one. The teacher selects
students in pairs to perform the entire dialogue for the rest of the class. The teacher
does a single-slot substitution drill where she gives them a cue word and the
students replace a word in the sentence from the dialogue e.g., I am going to the
post office (bank). The Teacher then does a multiple-slot substitution drill. She gives
them a cue phrase e.g. the park and more cues follow. Each cue is accompanied by a
picture. She keeps increasing the complexity of the task. She encourages the
students when they say it correctly. The substitution drill is followed by a
transformation drill e.g. changing an affirmative sentence into a negative one or
interrogative etc. The question-and-answer drill follows with the teacher holding up
pictures. “Are you going to the park?” “Yes, I’m going to the park” or “No, I am going
to the supermarket.”. She corrects errors if any by restating. In later classes, the
teacher will do a revision to anticipate where the students will have trouble. The
Teacher writes on the board and limited writing activity is given, information about
the culture of the language is presented and so on.
The Silent Way Method
The Silent Way did not emerge directly from the cognitive code approach, but it shares certain principles
with it. The silent way is a methodology of teaching language based on the idea that teachers should be
as silent as possible during a class but learners should be encouraged to speak as much as possible.
There are three basic principles:
Example
The teacher shows the learners a small red Cuisenaire rod and a bigger blue one and says ‘The blue one is
bigger than the red one'. The learners repeat this. The teacher then substitutes the rods to produce other
models, and finally encourages the learners to produce their own comparisons.
In the classroom
Areas of target language where Cuisenaire rods can be useful include word boundaries, contracted forms,
prepositions, word order and word stress. Learners can use the rods to first represent and then to
manipulate language.
That learning is facilitated if the learner discovers rather than remember or repeats
The Silent Way belongs to a tradition that views learning as a problem solving, creative, discovering
activity, in which the learner is a principal actor rather than a bench-bound listener (Bruner 1966).
The use of the word “silent” is also significant, as Silent Way is based on the premise that the teacher
should be silent as possible in the classroom in order to encourage the learner to produce as much
language as possible.
The role of the teacher is to direct students’ focus, facilitate self-reflection and provide verbal and
nonverbal feedback when necessary. Students, on the other hand, are encouraged to speak as much as
possible.
Most of the traditional tools for language instruction e.g. textbooks, worksheets etc. are completely absent
from this method. In their place, instruction takes place through the medium of Cuisenaire rods (colored
rods traditionally used in the teaching of math to primary school students) and charts that indicate the
correct pronunciation of certain letter without the teacher having to teach pronunciation through rote
memorization or call-and – response exercises, described by some as a “building block” approach.
The structural patterns of the target language are presented by the teacher and the grammar of the
language are learnt inductively by the learners.
Cuisenaire rods (small colored blocks of varying sizes originally intended for the teaching of
mathematics) are often used to illustrate meaning. New items are added sparingly by the teacher and
learners take these as far as they can in their communication ntil the need for the next new item becomes
apparent. The teacher then provides this new item by modeling it very clearly just once. The learners are
then left to use the new item and to incorporate it into their existing stock of language, again taking it as
far as they can until the next item is needed and so on.
This minimalist role of the teacher has led some critics to describe Silent Way teachers as “aloof” and,
indeed, this apparently excessive degree of self-restraint can be seen as such. The prominent writer on
language teaching, Earl W. Stevick has described the role of the teacher in Silent Way as “Teach, test, get
out of the way”. The apparent lack of real communication in the approach has also been criticized, with
some arguing that it is difficult to take the approach beyond the very basics of the language, with only
highly motivate learners being able to generate real communication from the rigid structures illustrated by
the rods. The fact that, for logistical reasons, it is limited to relatively small groups of learners is also seen
as a weakness.
Nowadays
As with other methods and approaches, however, aspects of Silent Way can be observed in many lessons
in the modern classroom. Cuisenaire rods are also popular with some teachers and can be used extremely
creatively for various purposes from teaching pronunciation to story-telling. The idea of modeling a new
structure or item of vocabulary just once may also have some justification as it encourages learners both
to listen more carefully and then to experiment with their own production of the utterance.
We all know what the research says: Students learn better when they can be active participants it their
own learning. It just seems logical that, when it comes to language, allowing students to do all the talking
is the best way to accomplish that.
Students are forced to figure out all kinds of things on their own. While mimicking some of the real-life
problem-solving situations, they might find themselves facing it immersed in the target language. These
are skills that they will not have the opportunity to develop. If the teacher always does the figuring out for
them. Students are engaged in the learning process, discovering words and sounds instead of having these
drilled into them. Students become more engaged and invested in the process. As they assume more
responsibility for their own learning, and tasks have more relevance.
Limited input from the teacher means almost no criticism means students feel that it is safe to make
mistakes, a necessary step in language learning.
Drawbacks
Without adequate explanation or preparation, they might be unsure of how to handle it, especially in the
beginning.
If a students has an IEP, or requires extra coaching because of special needs, they can really struggle with
the Silent Way.
Students may feel that they are not getting enough feedback. Students may feel insecure about the lack of
verbal positive or negative reinforcement in the beginning. Silent Way aims for quality rather than
quantity. It may feel like students spend a lot of time learning the basics of vocabulary and pronunciation.
Rather than progressing quickly through these topics.
Strategies
Check in individually with students who need it from time to time, to make sure that they are okay. The
teacher should schedule regular meeting times with them, or check in discreetly during class. This will
help them feel more confident about their progress.
Practice conveying a message with body language, gestures and facial expressions.
Chapter 5 The Silent Way
The Silent Way did not emerge directly from the cognitive code approach,
but it shares certain principles with it. The silent way is a methodology of
teaching language based on the idea that teachers should be as silent as
possible during a class but learners should be encouraged to speak as much
as possible. The three basic principles of the Silent Way method are: -
learning is facilitated if the learner discovers rather than remembers or
memorizes, learning is aided by physical objects such as Cuisenaire rods,
and communication is central to learning.
2. Watch the video clip that has been shared in the group and describe the
class proceedings. Do you think it is following the CLT method? Justify.
What is content-based instruction?
The focus of a CBI lesson is on the topic or subject matter. During the lesson,
students are focused on learning about something. This could be anything
that interests them from a serious science subject to their favorite pop star
or even a topical news story or film. They learn about this subject using the
language they are trying to learn, rather than their native language, as a tool
for developing knowledge and so they develop their linguistic ability in the
target language. This is thought to be a more natural way of developing
language ability and one that corresponds more to the way we originally
learned our first language.
There are many ways to approach creating a CBI lesson. This is one possible
way.
Preparation
o Choose a subject of interest to students.
o Find three or four suitable sources that deal with different
aspects of the subject. These could be websites, reference
books, audio or video of lectures, or even real people.
It can be hard to find information sources and texts that lower levels
can understand. Also, the sharing of information in the target language
may cause great difficulties. A possible way around this at lower levels
is either to use texts in the students' native language and then get them
to use the target language for the sharing of information and end
product, or to have texts in the target language, but allow the students
to present the end product in their native language. These options
should reduce the level of challenge.
Some students may copy directly from the source texts they use to get
their information. Avoid this by designing tasks that demand students
evaluate the information in some way, to draw conclusions, or to put it
to some practical use. Having information sources that have conflicting
information can also be helpful as students have to decide which
information they agree with or most believe.
Conclusions
While CBI can be both challenging and demanding for the teacher and the
students, it can also be very stimulating and rewarding. The degree to which
you adopt this approach may well depend on the willingness of your
students, the institution in which you work, and the availability of resources
within your environment. It could be something that your school wants to
consider introducing across the curriculum or something that you experiment
with just for one or two lessons. Whichever you choose to do I would advise
that you try to involve other teachers within your school, particularly teachers
from other subjects. This could help you both in terms of finding sources of
information and in having the support of others in helping you evaluate your
work.