2432-261X-2-0331
2432-261X-2-0331
2432-261X-2-0331
Narihito Nagoshi1), Ken Ishii1)2)3), Kaori Kameyama4), Osahiko Tsuji1), Eijiro Okada1), Nobuyuki Fujita1), Mitsuru Yagi1),
Morio Matsumoto1), Masaya Nakamura1) and Kota Watanabe1)
Abstract:
Introduction: Intramedullary lesions and tumors are generally accessed by a posterior approach. However, if the lesion is
located on the ventral side of the spinal cord, a posterior resection with myelotomy poses technical difficulties. We report
two cases of complete resection of a cervical ventral intramedullary cavernous hemangioma using an anterior approach.
Case Report: Two cases of intramedullary cavernous hemangioma located on the ventral side of the spinal cord were
successfully treated by total resection with anterior cervical corpectomy followed by anterior spinal fusion with an autolo-
gous bone strut from the iliac crest. In both cases, the postoperative course was uneventful, and there was no neurological
deficit. Bony fusion was achieved, and there was no recurrence or complication during a follow-up period of at least two
years.
Conclusions: Here, we describe an anterior approach for total resection of cavernous hemangiomas on the ventral side of
the cervical spinal cord. Outcomes were stable two years after the operations. Although the method should be assessed with
more patients and a longer follow-up time, this anterior approach may be useful for the radical resection of a vascular mal-
formation or tumor.
Keywords:
Cavernous hemangiomas, Ventral side of spinal cord, Intramedullary lesions, Anterior approach, Surgical outcomes
Spine Surg Relat Res 2018; 2(4): 331-334
dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0088
331
Spine Surg Relat Res 2018; 2(4): 331-334 dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0088
Figure 1. Preoperative T2-weighted MRI at sagittal (left) and axial (right) sections. Note the het-
erogeneous intensity mass with hemosiderin deposition in the ventral region of the spinal cord at the
C6 level (arrowheads).
Figure 2. Hematoxylin-eosin staining of resected lesions at lower (left) and higher (right) magnifica-
tions. Dilated thin-walled vessels with flattened endothelial cells are prominent.
332
dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0088 Spine Surg Relat Res 2018; 2(4): 331-334
Figure 3. Preoperative T2-weighted MRI at sagittal (left) and axial (right) sections show an intra-
medullary heterogeneous lesion surrounded by a hypointense area at the ventral side of the C6 level
(arrowheads).
Figure 4. Postoperative MRI (left) and an X-ray image (right) show that the CH was resected and
bony fusion has been achieved.
approach for CH resection at the cervical spinal cord, infor- A posterior approach is generally selected to access intra-
mation is lacking about the detailed surgical technique or medullary sites. If the tumor or malformation exists on the
clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up3-6). Here, we suc- ventral side, however, deep myelotomy is required, increas-
cessfully resected intramedullary CHs on the cervical ventral ing the risk for postoperative neurological deterioration.
side, as shown in our video images, and demonstrated stable Moreover, indirect access from the dorsal side to the ventral
outcomes without perioperative complications or recurrence side can make it challenging to visualize the whole lesion,
at least two years after surgery. This approach makes it eas- resulting in incomplete resection. Fontaine et al. advocated
ier to directly resect a vascular malformation that exists at an anterolateral approach for ventral lesions7), but this
the ventral part of the spinal cord. Given the nature of a method carries a risk for vertebral artery injury.
case report, however, further study is needed to validate the The anterior approach has several disadvantages. Resec-
usefulness of this approach, by increasing the number of pa- tion of the vertebral bodies with intervertebral discs and an-
tients and observing them for a longer follow-up period. terior and posterior longitudinal ligaments causes spinal in-
333
Spine Surg Relat Res 2018; 2(4): 331-334 dx.doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2017-0088
334