SCBT

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Seguin Form Board

Intelligence is a complex and multifaceted construct that has been studied

and debated by psychologists and researchers for centuries. According to

Sternberg (2004), intelligence refers to the cognitive abilities that enable

individuals to process information, learn, reason, and adapt to their

environment. Gardner's Multiple Intelligences Theory (1983) proposes that

there are multiple types of intelligence, including linguistic, logical-

mathematical, spatial, bodily-kinesthetics, musical, interpersonal,

intrapersonal, and naturalistic intelligence. Sternberg's Triarchic Theory of

Intelligence (1985) suggests that intelligence consists of three

components: analytical, creative, and practical intelligence. Binet's Theory

of Intelligence (1905) focused on verbal and non-verbal abilities, and

introduced the concept of IQ (intelligence quotient). Intelligence can be

measured through various means, including IQ tests, achievement tests,

and neuropsychological assessments (Horn, 1985). Emotional intelligence,

which refers to the ability to recognise and regulate emotions in oneself

and others, is also an important aspect of intelligence (Goleman, 1995).

Theories of intelligence have evolved over time, from the early work of

Binet and Simon (1916) to the more recent triarchic theory of Sternberg

(1985). Each theory has contributed to our understanding of intelligence

and its various components. For example, Gardner's theory of multiple

intelligences highlights the importance of considering different types of

intelligence, such as spatial and musical intelligence, in addition to


traditional verbal and mathematical abilities. Similarly, Sternberg's

triarchic theory emphasises the importance of practical intelligence, which

involves the ability to apply knowledge and skills in real-world situations.

In addition to theoretical perspectives, research on intelligence has also

focused on the development and use of intelligence tests. These tests are

designed to measure various aspects of cognitive ability, such as verbal

comprehension, spatial reasoning, and working memory (Horn, 1985).

Intelligence tests have been widely used in educational and employment

settings to assess individual differences in cognitive ability (Anastasi,

1988). However, the use of intelligence tests has also been the subject of

controversy and debate, with some critics arguing that the tests are

culturally biased (Helms, 1992) or that they do not provide a

comprehensive picture of an individual's cognitive abilities (Gardner,

1983).

The Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) theory is a widely accepted framework for

understanding human intelligence. According to this theory, intelligence

consists of a hierarchy of cognitive abilities, ranging from narrow, specific

abilities to broad, general abilities (McGrew, 2009). The theory proposes

that there are 10 broad cognitive abilities, including fluid intelligence,

crystallised intelligence, and general memory and learning (Carroll, 1993).

The Structure of Intellect (SOI) model, developed by J.P. Guilford, is

another influential theory of intelligence. According to this model,

intelligence consists of 120 different cognitive abilities, organised into five


categories: operations, content, products, memory, and evaluation

(Guilford, 1967).

The Binet-Kamat Test of Intelligence is a widely used intelligence test that

was developed by Alfred Binet and Sakharam Kamat. The test is designed

to measure verbal and non-verbal abilities in children and adults, and is

widely used in educational and clinical settings (Binet & Kamat, 1916).

Language and linguistic intelligence are critical components of human

cognition. According to Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences,

linguistic intelligence is one of the nine distinct types of intelligence

(Gardner, 1983). Linguistic intelligence involves the ability to use

language effectively, including reading, writing, speaking, and listening.

Reliability and Validity

Aim
To assess the intelligence of the participant using Binet Kamath test of

intelligence

Method

Participant details

Name: SA

Age: 6 years old

Gender: Male

Education:UKG student

Materials required

•Manual for Binet-Kamath test of intelligence

• Binet - Kamath test of intelligence Kit

•Stop watch

•writing materials - paper and pencil

Procedure
The subject was seated comfortably in a distraction free room and having proper

light and verification. gave brief idea about the assessment test and ensured the

confidentiality and rapport was established. Detailed instructions for each subtest

was gives as per the BKT manual. According to the age level of the participant test

of previous level is administered. The test like repetition of Digits and repetition of

syllable was presented once.

The standard procedure at BKT was followed which is to begin the test at a level

slightly below the subject's age. If the individual fails the test within the
year level first administered, then the next lower level is given. This

procedure is continued until a level is reached at which all tests are

passed. This level is known as the "Basal Age." If testing is failed at this

age, it is known as the "Testing Age" or the age at which the test is

established.

Scoring

The BKT (Binet-Kamat Test) items are scored on an all-or-none basis. For

each test, the minimal performance that constitutes passing is specified in

the test manual. Computing Basal Age involves identifying the highest age

level below which all the test items are passed. Conversely, the Testing

Age is the age at which all items are failed.

Final IQ = 100 + (Conversion to SD scale)

Conversion to 15 SD scale: IQ from BKT–Mean of BKT(100)x

15(SD of WAIS)

IQ = (18.1 / SD of BKT) x (IQ - 100) * 15

18.7(SD of BKT)

Example calculation:

IQ = (18.7 / 2) = ?

You might also like