Hospital at night
Hospital at night
Abstract
The reduction in the working hours of doctors represents a challenge to the delivery of medical care to acutely
sick patients 24 hours a day. Increasing the number of doctors to support multiple specialty rosters is not the
solution for economic or organizational reasons. This paper outlines an alternative, economically viable
multidisciplinary solution that has been shown to improve patient outcomes and provides organizational
consistency. The change requires strong clinical leadership, with organizational commitment to both cultural and
structural change. Careful attention to ensuring the teams possess the appropriate competencies, implementing a
reliable process to identify the sickest patients and escalate their care, and structuring rotas efficiently are essential
features of success.
* Correspondence: [email protected]
3
London Deanery, London, UK
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© 2014 Hamilton-Fairley et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Hamilton-Fairley et al. BMC Medical Education 2014, 14(Suppl 1):S17 Page 2 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/S1/S17
Outline of problem
The Hospital at Night project In 2003 there were a total of 144 on-call rotas. These
In the United Kingdom, the pressure to reduce junior medical teams – consisting of two levels of doctors on-
doctors’ hours prompted a national project sponsored by call at any one time, with a consultant on-call from
the Department of Health: Hospital at Night (H@N). The home – were on-call only for their own patients. The
H@N project gathered evidence and provided guidance work intensity experienced by these teams varied
for the development of safe and functioning teams to according to specialty. Emergency and admitting,
Hamilton-Fairley et al. BMC Medical Education 2014, 14(Suppl 1):S17 Page 4 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/S1/S17
Table 1 Comparison of changes at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust versus Homerton University Hospital
NHS Foundation Trust
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Key drivers Patient safety Patient safety
Regulatory requirement to reduce doctors’ hours Regulatory requirement to reduce doctors’ hours
Controlling costs Maintaining/improving medical training
Maintaining/improving medical training
Key outcomes Reduction in HSMR Reduction in HSMR
Reduction in serious incidents No increase in serious incidents
Reduction in health care–associated infections Reduction in health care–associated infections
100% compliance with EWTR 100% compliance with EWTR
Maximum cost of £2.4 million
Data collection Analysis of on-call duties Presentations and discussions on how to improve patient care
Analysis of rotas
Creation of competency matrix
Hospital at SNPs with both clinical and site management responsibilities Clinical Site Manager Team with both clinical and site
Night Structured handover at the same time for all specialties management responsibilities
Baton bleeper for face-to-face handovers First point of contact for wards and other areas
First point of contact for wards and other areas Single team for emergency admissions via emergency
Twilight shifts for specialties (majority removed for overnight) department
On-call teams covering patients from all specialties Single team to cover inpatients
Consultant ward rounds by Surgery and General Internal
Medicine every 12 hours for all admissions
SNPs see, assess, treat, and /or refer acutely ill patients
18 pathways (with associated protocols) for common
emergencies
Taking Care 24/ Extension of H@N into the day Separation of elective and emergency work
7 Physician of the week for surgical inpatients working with Single admissions area for elective work
surgical teams Acute Care Unit
Single escalation system for both sites Doctors work only in one or the other pathway for set periods
Single admissions area for elective surgical patients of time, thereby maximizing training opportunities
Handovers for planned discharge and weekend care Consultant in General Internal Medicine present in emergency
Regular contact with wards and doctors by SNP every 6 hours area 12 hours per day
24/7 Factual handover at 8 a.m.
Elective to emergency team handover at 4 p.m.
Impact on Initial reduction in HSMR Initial reduction in HSMR
patient care Sustained reduction in serious incidents Reduction in health care–associated infections
Reduction in health care–associated infections
Reduction in in-hospital cardiac arrests
Reduction in lengths of stay
Financial impact H@N: £4.1 million saving; £2.4 million in recurrent costs H@N: £100,000 saving
24/7: closure of 250 beds 24/7: £600,000 saving; £250,000 in recurrent costs
Educational H@N: no change in feedback from junior doctors H@N: no change in feedback from junior doctors
impact 24/7: improved teaching time participation for most junior staff Sustained hours of direct supervision/elective work
and physicians (daily seminar from physician of the week) Reduction in hours spent in “acute care team” for each doctor
Educational handover at 10 a.m.
Lessons learned Need involvement of all staff, not just medical Need involvement of all staff, not just medical
Need good, relevant data Need good, relevant data
Training for staff who are extending/changing their role Training for staff who are extending/changing their role
The change is part of a whole system change that continues to The change is part of a whole system change that continues to
evolve; 24/7 is only one part that contributes to the evolve; 24/7 is only one part that contributes to the
improvement as a whole improvement as a whole
Sustainability Yes – no appetite to return to the on-call system Yes – no appetite to return to the on-call system
EWTR = European Working Time Regulation; HSMR = Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio; SNP = senior nurse practitioner
General Internal Medicine, Obstetrics, Anaesthetics, The junior member of the medical team was typically
Intensive/High Dependency Care, and Pediatrics teams the first to be called to attend to a patient. Senior doc-
tended to work hard throughout the day and night. In tors were usually called later and only if the junior doc-
contrast, general ward patients tended to require medi- tor thought it was necessary. It is well documented that
cal attention only until 8:30 p.m., and most other speci- this was often the root cause of a poor outcome [9].
alty physicians slept for at least five hours per night The hospital’s risk record in 2002 included 16 serious
without being disturbed. adverse incidents that were considered to be avoidable.
Hamilton-Fairley et al. BMC Medical Education 2014, 14(Suppl 1):S17 Page 5 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/S1/S17
There were also a significant number of cases of methi- priority, starts treatment according to agreed-upon
cillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (81 per protocols, and refers the patient to the relevant doc-
year). In addition, the Hospital Standardised Mortality tor, physiotherapist, nurse, etc.
Ratio (HSMR) was at the United Kingdom average. • There is an agreed-upon escalation policy that
Over a six-month period ending in August 2004, the involves, as necessary, referral to the Medical Emer-
hospital started to reduce junior doctors’ working hours gency Team (critical care outreach). (See Figure 2
to an average of 48 per week to comply with the for additional details.)
EWTR. As the hospital’s first priority was patient safety, • Handover was synchronized across the Trusts, and
any proposed solution had to improve patient care. a 30-minute period was built into shift times for
handover. (See Figure 3 for more details.)
Key measures of improvement • Each team holds a “baton” bleeper that, at the end
The vision was to reorganize care so that all patients of shift, has to be handed over. This ensures that
had access to the right person with the right skills for there is a face-to-face handover.
their needs at the right time. Patient care and patient • Specialist teams (referred to as twilight teams) stay
safety were the prime goals, along with the achievement on-site until 9 p.m. (with handover at 8.30 p.m.) to
of the EWTR. Identified outcome measures included a complete all routine tasks and ensure that all their
reduction in serious adverse incidents, a reduction in patients are stable with no ongoing needs.
the number of cases of MRSA, and a reduction in the • A representative from each twilight team attends
HSMR. handover to report on all patients requiring input/
additional observation through the night.
Process of gathering information • The overnight non-acute rotas were reduced to a
Colleagues in Human Resources collected information minimum. As well, junior surgical rotas were merged
about all medical rotas. A financial costing was done of and staff were shared.
maintaining on-call rotas. In addition, an analysis of on-
call work from 5 p.m. to 8 a.m. was undertaken. Meet-
ings to understand patients requirements out of hours
were held with all staff, including porters, transport,
medical records, and IT. This allowed us to identify all
required competencies in addition to clinical competen-
cies, such as the ability to access databases and medical
records, equipment such as wheelchairs, and services
such as radiology, the Intensive Therapy Unit, High-
Dependency Care, and the morturary.
Other changes introduced at the same time included SNP for the first 12 hours; this is in addition to
the following: increased observation times by the nurses on the wards.
Surgeons can now spend longer in theatre, as physicians
• Extending this system into the day. are on duty for post-operative medical care. Residents
• Developing a medical perioperative support team and other doctors-in-training report that they are being
for the elderly. supported and that they receive good training and
• Naming a physician for each week to oversee the teaching.
elective surgical and oncology patients; this has
reduced the in-patient length of stay and reduced Case 2: Homerton University Hospital NHS
the number of in-hospital cardiac arrests from an Foundation Trust
average of 13 per month to 3 per month for the Context
nine months between March and December 2011 Homerton University Hospital is a 550-bed district gen-
(with no in-hospital cardiac arrests for 102 consecu- eral hospital located in Hackney, an inner city area with
tive days). a multi-ethnic, deprived population of approximately
250,000 to 300,000 people. The hospital provides acute
Since 2004, shortening the length of stay has led to a hospital and community services for the local popula-
reduction in the bed base by 250 beds, despite an overall tion. It also offers some tertiary services, including bar-
increase in in-patient episodes of 13% (average of 3% iatric surgery, neurological rehabilitation, neonatal
per annum). This reduction in the bed base has saved intensive care, and high-risk maternity care.
£1 million per annum per 25 beds closed and has On average there are 120,000 emergency department
increased the income generated as a result of the visits per year. In addition, the hospital delivers 5,000
increased number of Finished Consultant Episodes (the babies each year. The annual turnover is in excess of
basis on which NHS acute trusts are paid). £230 million.
2009 deadline, we took this to the next stage: “Taking As Taking Care 24/7 evolved, it became obvious that
Care 24/7,” with a maximum 48-hour week for all we had made a number of errors that had to be cor-
doctors. rected. For instance, handovers were often unfocused
Stage 1 – Hospital at Night (2003) and lengthy, and they were occurring too frequently.
Clinical Site Managers – highly trained nurses usually To remedy this situation, we changed handovers to a
with a background in acute/emergency/critical care brief factual handover at 8 a.m., a more contemplative
medicine – were introduced to coordinate the night and educational handover after the post take ward
work and to be the first on-call. These managers round at 10:30 a.m., and a cold to hot team handover
screened out tasks that did not need to be done by a at 4 p.m. The night handover continued as it had as
doctor and ensured that the most-appropriate doctor, part of H@N.
one who was often not the most junior, was called to
perform any required tasks. Having this one point of Resources needed
initial contact also helped to prevent multiple calls For both service redesign projects we employed a pro-
being made to different doctors for the same task. ject manager for a little over 12 months. We used no
These individuals also supervised – and ensured maxi- other additional resources, although most staff input
mum attendance at – the hospital-wide nighttime hand- took place during normal working hours and, therefore,
over. In addition, an analysis of work performed by theoretical costs were clearly involved.
resident on-call junior doctors showed that many of
them had little to do overnight. Accordingly, these doc- Effects of change on patient care
tors were removed from the on-call rotas. We looked at a number of indicators to assess the
Some senior doctors were concerned that these impact of these changes on patient care. The HSMR fell
changes were driven by agendas other than patient care shortly after we introduced Taking Care 24/7, before
(e.g., to save costs or to make consultants work more gradually returning to baseline (Figure 4). It is important
hours), and this was partly true. To help alleviate these to emphasize that improvements to patient care cannot
concerns, a series of presentations and discussions were be attributed solely to the changes in the junior doctors’
held for all grades of medical staff, other clinicians, and hours of work. The way services were delivered changed,
managers to describe how patient care could be in particular the introduction of an extended working
improved with the new approach. In a short amount of day for senior doctors. In addition, the elective and
time the value of the Clinical Site Manager Team as emergency admissions were each placed in a specific
first point of contact for out-of-hours care was recog- location with dedicated medical and nursing teams spe-
nized and welcomed. cific to each group with no possibility for split or con-
Stage 2 – Taking Care 24/7 (2007) fused duties for each group of staff. Other, less
Staff were divided into elective (“cold”) and emergency quantifiable, things inevitably changed at the same time.
(“hot”) teams. Trainee doctors spent time, usually peri- Nevertheless, we implemented what had been regarded,
ods of weeks, on each team, and were thus able to focus by some, as dangerous reforms to junior doctors’ hours
exclusively on either “hot” or “cold” work for both ser-
vice delivery and training purposes at different times.
Following a review of patient flows prior to imple-
menting Taking Care 24/7, all elective surgical admis-
sions were directed to a single ward area. From there,
they went to theatres and, finally, to their in-patient
recovery ward. This reduced congestion on receiving
wards, as patients scheduled for discharge could stay
until mid-morning, and also prevent the unnecessary
displacement of newly admitted patients. All emergency
admissions (except maternity and children) were
admitted to the Acute Care Unit, which was staffed by
the Acute Care Team.
Importantly, between 2003 and 2007 we had already
changed the working patterns of consultants so that
they were required to provide senior cover for an Figure 4 Quarterly in-hospital relative risk of mortality, with 95%
extended 12-hour working day for emergency care on confidence intervals, for all non-elective admissions, Homerton
weekdays, with a slightly shorter time commitment on University Hospital, London, UK. Values shown in green are
statistically significant deviations from expected values.
weekends.
Hamilton-Fairley et al. BMC Medical Education 2014, 14(Suppl 1):S17 Page 9 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/S1/S17
without detriment to patient safety. The following It is essential to focus on the demands of the service
points, in particular, were observed: and the training needs, not on the hours per se. Dealing
with the hours of work in isolation – or even as the
• There were no deleterious effects on length of stay prime mover – will not provide solutions, but will
or the number of admissions and readmissions. instead exacerbate problems and fault lines in the cur-
• No significant untoward incidents were reported at rent system.
the time of implementation or since that are attribu-
table to the changes. Current approach
• The incidence of health care–associated infections We plan to continue with the service redesign. It is
fell – and continues to fall – after the implementa- becoming clear that a senior consultant presence is
tion of Taking Care 24/7. required seven days a week and even, possibly, around
the clock for acute care. This currently presents major
financial challenges.
Effects of change on education
We were able to maintain hours of direct supervision of Discussion
trainees by consultants in their elective time because Working excessive hours puts patients at unacceptable
during that time there was no night on-call or weekend risk, is bad for the health of practitioners, and increases
work. Taken over a whole year, the time devoted to the risk of both accidents in the workplace and car acci-
cold shifts was maintained, while that devoted to hot dents after leaving work. Health care in general – and
shifts was reduced. medicine in particular – has been slow to develop ways
of working that enable safe delivery of modern medical
Effects of change on finances care within a safe environment for the staff who are
The changes associated with H@N saved approximately delivering that care. Changes to working hours have
£100,000 per year (in 2003 dollars). The savings asso- perceived, but not proven, negative effects on continuity
ciated with Taking Care 24/7 were approximately of care and the training of junior doctors. The case stu-
£600,000. For the latter, additional costs incurred were dies we describe outline how it is possible to organize
£250,000 (in 2007 dollars) to pay for the increased nur- health care staff so that the twin aims of safety for
sing presence and some junior staff numbers. Both of patients and staff and a good environment for training
these sums were recurrent. Had we not radically chan- can be realized. While the principles might be the same,
ged the service model, the additional costs would have it is clear that different hospitals will take somewhat dif-
been very much greater and no savings would have been ferent approaches to the task of maintaining sufficient
realized. and appropriate medical cover for patients being
The savings were achieved by reducing all doctors’ admitted as emergency or elective patients. An overview
hours of work to 48 per week and removing some from of the systematic approach described in these two hospi-
resident on-call work completely. tals is summarized in Table 1.
The extended role of nurses in both of these models is
Lessons learned striking, in particular their role as coordinator for the
The key to successful implementation of these changes hospital site and for the clinical assessment of deterior-
was to involve those responsible for delivering the ating patients. The availability of, and appropriate train-
changes in the planning process and to manage the ing for, these staff members is crucial to the success of
changes in clear phases. We used evidence from the the system. Initial fears that this would erode the role of
first phase to build up confidence; this allowed us to the doctor have not been borne out as this system tends
progress to the further phases of implementation. It was to allow doctors to be called appropriately to optimize
important for both system changes to encourage direct the management of patient care.
and indirect feedback so that problems could be dealt The coordination of all admissions and discharges by
with and successes celebrated as soon as possible. a single person who is aware of the organization of the
whole hospital is key to the success of separating the
Message for others elective and acute pathways for patients. This also
Effective communication is vital to implementing change allows teams to concentrate on one pathway without
of this magnitude. Some of the better suggestions for worrying about the other. This appears to improve
improvement to the system were made by doctors in patient care through improved teamwork and increased
training, those who were living through these changes efficiency in moving through the elements of the path-
to the way they worked. Feedback, even hostile, must be way facilitated by a single team. Concentrating on the
encouraged and actively sought. way of working and minimizing the opportunity for
Hamilton-Fairley et al. BMC Medical Education 2014, 14(Suppl 1):S17 Page 10 of 10
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/14/S1/S17
medical errors (reducing fatigue through proper rest and Authors’ details
1
Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 2Homerton
minimizing disruption to the circadian rhythm) also
University Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 3London Deanery,
appears to minimize costs and can lead to sustained London, UK.
financial savings.
Published: 11 December 2014
Work on competencies required for overnight care has
allowed doctors with generic skills to be available for
References
overnight emergencies for a group of specialties (e.g., for 1. Chantler C: The role of education in the delivery of health care. The
surgical patients, junior residents can cover inpatients Lancet 1999, 353:1178-1181.
2. McKee M, Black N: Hours of Work of Junior Hospital Doctors: Is there a
from all surgical specialties with distant support from
Solution? J Manage Med 1991, 3:40-54.
senior residents for the rare specialty-specific 3. Dyer C: Junior doctors’ hours; fighting fund set up after writ. BMJ 1989,
emergency). 298:910-911.
4. Chikwe J, de Souza AC, Pepper JR: No time to train the surgeons. BMJ
Senior residents can be on-call from home, taking
2004, 328:418.
referrals from the H@N team or other centres. A single 5. Department of Health: The implementation and impact of Hospital at
team was needed to cover admissions for the emergency Night pilot projects: An evaluation report. 4117 [http://www.dh.gov.uk/
en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/
department. Thus fewer doctors are present in the hos-
DH_968].
pital, although they work harder in short bursts. The 6. Barger LK, Ayas NT, Cade BE, Cronin JW, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Czeisler EA:
key to the success of such a system is that all clinical Impact of extended-duration shifts on medical errors, adverse events,
and attentional failures. PLoS Med 2006, 3:e487.
professionals work together with an organized coordi-
7. Harrington JM: Health effects of shift work and extended hours of work.
nated approach that includes assessment, prioritization, Occup Environ Med 2001, 58:68-72.
treatment, and, if appropriate, further referral. The team 8. Barger LK, Cade BE, Ayas NT, Cronin JW, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Czeisler CA:
Extended work shifts and the risk of motor vehicle crashes among
leader, usually a senior advanced nurse practitioner,
interns. N Eng J Med 2005, 352:125-134.
receives all calls and coordinates all activity within the 9. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death: Deaths in
hospital. Acute Hospitals: Caring to the End? 2009 [http://www.ncepod.org.uk/dah.
htm].
The important messages are that changing from a
10. Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board: National Training
standard approach to doctors’ duty hours to a coordi- Surveys 2008-2009 Key findings. 2008 [http://www.gmc-uk.org/
nated H@N or Hospital 24/7 approach requires signifi- National_Training_Surveys__09_20090929.pdf_30512348.pdf].
11. Czeisler CA, Moore-Ede MC, Coleman RH: Rotating shift work schedules
cant organizational change that will have an impact on
that disrupt sleep are improved by applying circadian principles. Science
the working practices of many clinicians. This change is 1982, 4558:460-463.
not easy, and it requires considerable determination and 12. Moss F: Junior doctors’ pay: a wake-up call to the NHS. BMJ 2000,
320:1224.
continuing input from senior staff to embed and main-
tain it. The difficulty lies in persuading many dedicated doi:10.1186/1472-6920-14-S1-S17
individuals that working differently will indeed provide Cite this article as: Hamilton-Fairley et al.: Hospital at night: an
organizational design that provides safer care at night. BMC Medical
better and safer care. The hospitals in the United King- Education 2014 14(Suppl 1):S17.
dom that have implemented this change have all shown
improvement in patient safety, with some evidence of
reduced costs overall.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Declarations
Resources and secretariat support for this project was provided by the Royal
College.
This article has been published as part of BMC Medical Education Volume 14
Supplement 1, 2014: Resident duty hours across borders: an international
perspective. The full contents of the supplement are available online at Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
http://www.biomedcentral.com/bmcmededuc/supplements/14/S1. This and take full advantage of:
article was submitted and peer reviewed in 2012. Final acceptance for
publication as part of this supplement was in 2014.
• Convenient online submission
Publication of this supplement was supported and funded by the Royal
College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. The funding agency played • Thorough peer review
no role in the design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in • No space constraints or color figure charges
the writing of the manuscripts; and in the decision to submit the
• Immediate publication on acceptance
manuscript for publication. The articles have been through the journal’s
standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors • Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
declare that they have no competing interests. • Research which is freely available for redistribution