GGBS
GGBS
net/publication/354118652
CITATIONS READS
0 428
3 authors:
Aneel Manan
CECOS University
16 PUBLICATIONS 189 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Shaheed Ullah on 25 August 2021.
However, poor outcomes were achieved when substituting 80 Nominal maximum size of coarse aggregate was 19.
percent of the slag, & in the 1st days of setting, the strength of 5mm.Different tests were performed on aggregate to evaluate
the control concrete was not acquired. Beushausen et al.[14] its physical property as shown in Table 2.
Realized, under damp curing environment & when the slag
substitute rate is lower than 50 percent, the one day concrete 2.3 GROUND GRANULATED BLAST-FURNACE
early age strength approximately directly reduces with the SLAG (GGBS)
raise in the slag substitute rate. At ages of 28 & 56 days,
because to the creation of calcium silicate hydrate from the GGBS is financially accessible in high amounts & suitable for
slag reaction, the compressive strength of concrete with making of high amount of ready-mix concrete at site in
mixed slag can exceed that of reference concrete. As a finite precast product assembly. The granulated slag is dried &
number of researches have been performed on the split tensile ground to a fine powder which is called Ground-granulated
& compressive strengths of (GGBS) based geo-polymer blast-furnace slag. It is white in color & has a bulk density of
concrete composite mixed with (GGBS). In this research, the 1200 kg/m3.The physical properties & chemical ingredients
impact of various factors on the hardened and fresh features of of GGBS are given in Table 3.
GPCC was noticed. Set on test outcomes, the performance of
concrete is considerably improved with incorporation of
GGBFS. Table 1: Physical and Chemical Property of OPC
2. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM Chemical Percentage Physical
Results
Property (%) Property
2.1 CEMENT Ca0 66.7 Size ≤ 75µ
Accordance to ASTM C150 [15], Ordinary Portland cement SiO2 26.9 Fineness 94%
(OPC) type-1 with 28 days compressive strength 42 Mpa and Normal
specific surface 322 m2/kg was used in this study. Al2O3 6.4 Consistency 28%
Furthermore, its chemical and physical properties are Initial
displayed in Table 1. Fe2O3 4.7 Stetting Time 36min
Final
2.2 AGGREGATE MgO 4.5 418min
Stetting Time
Specific
SO3 2.9 322 m2/kg
Natural sand was used as a FA in all the mixes in saturated surface
surface dry) condition. Normal weight crush stone was used K2O 1.4 Soundness 1.60%
as coarse aggregate in saturated dry condition (SSD) which 28-days
was obtained from Margallah Wah cantt Punjab Pakistan. Na2O 0.2 compressive 42Mpa
Strength
Table 3 : Properties of GBBS
Chemica
Percentage Physical
Table 2 : Properties of Aggregate l Results
(%) Property
Property
Physical Coarse Ca0 51.55 White
Fine aggregate Color
Property Aggregate
Specific
4.75mm to 19.5mm to SiO2 8.13 2.20
Particle Size Gravity
0.075mm 4.75
Fineness Al2O3 21.20 Type F
2.63 4.23
Modulus Clay (%)
Fe2O3 5.23 0.9
Absorption
4.08% 2.9% Bulk
Capacity
MgO 2.32 density 1200
Moisture (kg/m3)
1.8% 1.2%
Content
Bulk density SO3 1.07
1566 1575
(kg/m3)
K2O 1.9
Na2O 2.6
4712
Jawad Ahmad et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8(8), August 2020, 4711 - 4718
4713
Jawad Ahmad et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8(8), August 2020, 4711 - 4718
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION added to concrete mixes were 63 mm, 57 mm ,48 mm, 40 mm,
35mm and 28mm which were 20%, 35%, 43%, 45% and 47%
3.1 SLUMP lower than from reference concrete as shown in Figure 3. The
increased in slump value could be attributed due to smooth
Consistency of fresh concrete is a mix feature which includes and fine particle of GGBS. The fine particle of GBBS fills the
the various provisions of mobility, stability, finish ability, gap between aggregate sand and cement which facilitate
compatibility and place ability [20]. Slump value with varying better flow of cement concrete due less water is required for
dosage of GGBS were show in Figure 3. Workability of lubricant and as a result slump value increased. It has been
Concrete decreased as the percentage of GGBS increased. also noticed that raise in slump value was reported while the
Slump value of 0%, 10%, 20%, 30% ,40% and 50% of GGBS substitution ratio raised for GGBS [21].
4714
Jawad Ahmad et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8(8), August 2020, 4711 - 4718
3.3 SPLIT TENSILE STRENGTH sample may fail. According to ASTM C496-71[24], split
tensile test was performed on cylindrical samples of 300 mm
Tensile strength of concrete is the tensile stresses generated
height & 150 mm diameter at the ages of 7, 28 & 56 days
due to applying of the compressive load at which the concrete
curing.
4715
Jawad Ahmad et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8(8), August 2020, 4711 - 4718
4716
Jawad Ahmad et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8(8), August 2020, 4711 - 4718
4717
Jawad Ahmad et al., International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8(8), August 2020, 4711 - 4718
fills voids in between sand and coarse aggregate.so concrete incorporating ultra fine ground
more paste is available for lubricant. granulated blast-furnace slag. Constr Build Mater
Strength (compressive, flexure and split tensile) 40:875–881.
increased up to 30% substitution of GBBS and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.052
beyond 30% the strength gradually decreased. It is 12. Oner A, Akyuz S (2007) An experimental study on
due to fact that GBBS as a micro filler, which fills optimum usage of GGBS for the compressive
the voids in sand and coarse aggregate, giving more strength of concrete. Cem Concr Compos
dense concrete which results to enhance the 29:505–514.
mechanical performance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2007.01.001
It can be concluded that, GBBS as binding material 13. Khatib JM, Hibbert JJ (2005) Selected engineering
(cement) can be used to improve the mechanical properties of concrete incorporating slag and
properties of conventional concrete. From the metakaolin. Constr Build Mater 19:460–472.
economic and environmental point of view this https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.07.017
waste can be successfully used as binding material in 14. Beushausen H, Alexander M, Ballim Y (2012)
concrete production. Early-age properties, strength development and
REFERENCES heat of hydration of concrete containing various
1. Aydın S, Baradan B (2014) Effect of activator type South African slags at different replacement
and content on properties of alkali-activated slag ratios. Constr Build Mater 29:533–540.
mortars. Compos Part B Eng 57:166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.06.018.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.001 16. Grout F ASTM C 476, except with a maximum
2. Flynn RT, Grisinger TJ, Mather B, et al (2003) Slag slump of 4 inches, as measured according to
Cement in Concrete and Mortar. Am Concr Inst ASTM C 143. C 143M
Farmingt Hills, MI, USA. 17. C39/C39M A (2003) Standard test method for
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(03)00277. compressive strength of cylindrical concrete
3. Wang X-Y, Lee H-S (2010) Modeling the hydration specimens. Annu B ASTM Stand.
of concrete incorporating fly ash . Cem Concr Res
40:984–996. 18. Standard A (2010) C78. 2010. Stand Test Method
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.03.001 Flexural Strength. Simple Beam with Third-Point
4. Naik TR (2008) Sustainability of concrete Load (ASTM C78-10) West Conshohocken, PA
construction. Pract Period Struct Des Constr ASTM Int
13:98–103 19. Specimen CT ASTM C 31; one set of four standard
5. Sumajouw DMJ, Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Rangan B V cylinders for each compressive-strength test,
(2007) Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete: study unless otherwise directed. Mold store Cylind Lab
of slender reinforced columns. J Mater Sci test specimens Except when field-cured test
42:3124–3130. specimens are required
6. Glukhovskij V, Zaitsev Y, Pakhomov V (1983) 20. Aggarwal Y, Siddique R (2014) Microstructure and
Slag-alkaline cements and concretes-structure, properties of concrete using bottom ash and waste
properties, technological and economical aspects foundry sand as partial replacement of fine
of the use. Silic Ind 48:197–200. aggregates. Constr Build Mater 54:210–223.
7. Qiu J, Zhao Y, Xing J, Sun X (2019) Fly ash/blast https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.051
furnace slag-based geopolymer as a potential 21. Yuksel I, Genç A (2007) Properties of concrete
binder for mine backfilling: Effect of binder type containing nonground ash and slag as fine
and activator concentration. Adv Mater Sci Eng aggregate. ACI Mater J 104:397.
8. Mohan A, Mini KM (2018) Strength Studies of SCC https://doi.org/10.14359/18829
Incorporating Silica Fume and Ultra Fine GGBS. 22. Bouzoubaa N, Zhang M-H, Malhotra VM (2001)
Mater Today Proc 5:23752–23758 Mechanical properties and durability of concrete
9. Zhang T-S, Yu Q-J, Wei J-X, et al (2011) Effect of made with high-volume fly ash. Cem Concr Res
size fraction of ground granulated blast furnace 31:1393–1402.
slag on its strength contribution and hydraulic https://doi.org/10.1016/s0008-8846(01)00592-0
activity. Adv Sci Lett 4:1286–1291. Khan K, Amin MN (2017) Influence of fineness of
https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2011.1733 volcanic ash and its blends with quarry dust and
10. Sharmila P, Dhinakaran G (2016) Compressive slag on compressive strength of mortar under
strength, porosity and sorptivity of ultra fine slag different curing temperatures. Constr Build Mater
based high strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 154:514–528.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.
120:48–53 2017.07.214
11. Teng S, Lim TYD, Divsholi BS (2013) Durability 24. Designation A (1976) C496‐71. Stand Method Test
and mechanical properties of high strength Split Tensile Strength Cylind Concr Specimens.
4718