5
5
(Submitted January 15, 2011; in revised form May 26, 2012; published online June 29, 2012)
During the valve fabrication, hard metal is welded to stainless steel or invar alloy for sealing purposes
because of its good heat resistance operating at 500 °C. However, WC (tungsten carbide) dissolution in weld
pool softens the hard metal and decreases mechanical properties near the hard metal/weld interface. In
order to analyze the WC dissolution in welded joint, joining of hard metal and invar alloy was carried out
using laser-tungsten inert gas hybrid welding method. Microstructures of the weld region, chemical com-
position were investigated using optical microscope, scanning electron microscopy, and EDAX, respectively.
Mechanical properties such as microhardness and four-point bend strength test were performed. Larger
and smaller WC dissolution and WC dissolution through transition layer based on thermo-dynamics were
discussed. The results thus indicate that WC dissolution led to cellular microstructure, columnar crystal,
and transition layer under the effect of laser beam and tungsten arc. WC dissolution was affected by metal
ions Fe+, Ni+, Co+ exchange in W-M-C system, and WC grain growth was driven by forces caused by laser
beam and tungsten arc in larger WC, smaller WC, and liquid Fe, Ni systems.
WC-30Co 12,250 0.22 2780 0.47 99.85 416 2000 (bend strength) 8.10
Invar 8120 0.29 1450 0.48 14.58 139 430 (yield strength) 6.14
(Ref 20). On this basis, laser-TIG hybrid welding method is used The microstructures of the samples are characterized by
to join hard metal and invar alloy (Ref 23). means of optical observation and SEM. A Hitachi S-3400N
The goal of this research is to analyze WC dissolution SEM and Electron Probe Microanalyzer EPMA-8705 equipped
during laser-TIG welding on the basis of weld formation with an EDAX analyzer are used for morphology observations
analysis. Consequently, WC dissolution through transition layer and composition analyses. The samples for optical and SEM
based on thermo-dynamics and WC dissolution in liquid W-M-C observations are etched in a solution of mixed acid (1% HF,
system are discussed. 1.5% HCl, 2.5% HNO3, 95% H2O) and reagent (20% KOH +
20% K3 [Fe (CN)6] + 60% H2O vol.%) at room temperature.
After polishing, HXD-1000-type microhardness tester is
used to investigate the microhardness distribution through hard
2. Materials and Welding Procedure metal/weld interface. The load is 200 g; and holding time is
15 s. Four-point bend strength test is also carried out using
Hard alloys used in this study have a chemical composition dynamic mechanical analysis system. The length of samples is
(wt.%) of 4.29 C, 30 Co, and 65.71 W. The other base material 48 mm curvature radius of the sample is 0.1-0.3 mm, and
is an invar alloy. Its chemical composition (wt.%) is 42 Ni, 0.6 chamfer angle in head face is 45 9 c (0.1-0.3 mm).
C, 3.5 Mn, 3 Nb, and balance Fe. Table 1 gives the material
properties and mechanical properties of hard metal and invar
alloy, respectively. The welded joints are prepared using CO2 3. Experimental Results
laser in combination with TIG welder. The laser-TIG hybrid
system consists of laser, CNC platform, TIG welder, and
3.1 Macrostructure and Weld Formation
shielding gas system. Before preparing the joint, all the base
materials are cut into circular shape (diameter: 48 mm; The macrostructure of sample 1 is illustrated in Fig. 2. From
thickness: 6 mm). Two samples with same dimensions are the images, it is a partial joint penetration (PJP) weld: lack of
used with different welding parameters, given in Table 2. Laser side-wall fusion and lack of fusion at the root of the weld. The
spot diameter is 1 mm. Helium gas is employed as the major weld cannot extend completely through the thickness of base
shielding gas; argon is used as the minor shielding gas. metal joined because of the lack of fusion. Their influencing
illustrated in Fig. 6(d). The carbide particles mainly consist of 3.4 Microhardness and Bend Strength
W and C; Ni and Fe elements can be omitted. So the carbide
After polishing, microhardness in sample 2 is measured
particles are WC. The matrix is NiFe(Co) solid solution. The
using HXD-1000 type microhardness tester. As shown in
spectrums S6, S7, and S8 are illustrated in Fig. 8(a). In
Fig. 9(a), d stands for the distance from the bottom of the
contrast, the average atomic percent of Fe increases from 14.80
sample to the measured points, the microhardness distribution
to 17.84 to 18.19; this value of Ni increases from 11.41 to 14.69
curve is shown in Fig. 9(b). The vertical axis is microhardness
to 15.06. However, the element Co atomic percent decreases
values (HV0.2); horizontal axis stands for distance from fusion
from 8.61 to 2.26 to 1.45. So the primary constituents of S6 are
line. From the curve in Fig. 9(b), microhardness of hard metal
NiFe(Co) solution; columnar crystal (spectrums S7) and the
is much larger than that of invar alloy (150 HV0.2). The
matrix (spectrums S8) are NiFe solution. Figure 8(b) illustrates
microhardness of weld is nearly 300 HV0.2. In detail, smooth
the spectrums S9, S10, S11, and S12. In transition layer,
curve of microhardness is achieved from weld to hard metal. It
nonequilibrium WC (spectrums S9) is observed. The average
indicates that the better metallurgical bonding has been
atomic percent is 81.57 W, 17.71 C, and 0.73 Fe, and the
obtained. The microhardness test results agree with the
corresponding atomic ratio of W and C is 4.6. So, according to
microstructure analysis.
chemical compounds WC, W2C, W2C0.85, CW3, W6C2.54,
Four-point bend strength test is carried out according to
WC1x, or WCx in current literatures, the nonequilibrium WC
JISR-1601-1995 standard, referenced GB/T14452-93 to esti-
(W23C5 means each WC has lost 18 carbon atoms) is
mate the mechanical properties of welded joints. The failure
characterized with carbon depletion. The gray phase (spectrum
crack initiates from HAZ near invar side (or HAZ near hard
S10) mainly includes Fe and C, so it might be iron carbide. The
metal/weld interface). It propagates through the invar, weld,
spectrum S11 (Fe and Ni) is solid solution. The primary
and hard metal; finally, complete failure occurs in HAZ near
constituents of needle-like structure (spectrum S12) are W, Fe,
hard metal. The bend strength of sample 1 (rbb = 923.54 MPa)
C, and Ni. According to the published literatures so far,
is much lower than that of the sample 2 (rbb = 1483.56 MPa)
chemical compound Fe3W3C, Fe6W6C, Fe2W2C, FeW3C,
because of the presence of cracks and lack of penetration in
Fe3W3C-Fe4W2C, and Fe3.57W9.43C3.54 are observed; therefore,
sample 1. In contrast with our previous research (Ref 22), the
the needle-like structure is nonequilibrium Fe-W-C (g) phase.
Fig. 7 SEM images of superfine crystals (a) formation position and (b) morphology
maximum value of bend strength for sample 2 is higher than The following three factors lead to the failure of welded
that of the TIG welding sample (rbb = 1350 MPa) using joint: (1) sulfur and phosphorus. If their composition is
Ni-Fe-C alloy as filler metal. SEM images of fracture are shown excessive, hot crack is easily formed near invar/weld interface
in Fig. 10. Figure 10(a) shows the fracture of invar metal; some where crack origin is located (sample 1); (2) WC dissolution,
particles (white arrows) and hole (black arrow) have been aggregation, coarsening, and broken occurs. These phenomena
observed. This might be the main reason for crack initiation. will deteriorate HAZ near hard metal/weld interface where cold
Concaves instead of porosity have been found in fracture of crack initiation and propagation occurs (sample 2). This is
weld (black arrow in Fig. 10b). Figure 10(c) shows the brittle determined by heat flow, forces (arc force, stirring effects of
fracture of HAZ near hard metal/weld interface. The high- welds, high pressure of molten materials and ionized shielding
magnification WC fracture morphology (Fig. 10d) indicates gas and surface tension), and key-hole effect; (3) constrain and
typical intercrystalline and transcrystalline fractures. overheating. This is determined by welding process. Large
constrain and overheating will lead to crack initiation and Table 3 Composition analysis of typical phases
propagation: not only hot crack near invar/weld interface but in welded joints
also cold crack near hard metal/weld interface.
Spectrums Fe K WM CK Ni K Co K
S1
4. Discussions wt.% 33.81 34.80 3.11 22.30 5.97
at.% 39.45 12.33 16.87 24.75 6.60
From the above experimental results, we notice that WC S2
dissolution has led to nonequivalent brittle carbide (Table 3), wt.% 41.72 14.45 2.42 32.56 8.84
at.% 43.13 4.54 11.64 32.02 8.67
unconsolidated microstructures (Fig. 6d), and even crack
S3
failure (Fig. 10b). In general, WC dissolving in welds is wt.% 34.45 29.05 3.05 24.63 8.83
sensitive to heat input. The effect of heat input (tungsten arc or at.% 38.60 9.89 15.88 26.25 9.37
laser beam) on WC dissolution is significant. Under the effect S4
of tungsten arc, WC dissolution occurs at the top side near hard wt.% 1.41 91.05 6.29 1.26 …
metal/weld interface, as shown in Fig. 11(a). Nevertheless, at.% 2.37 46.49 49.14 2.01 …
according to our previous research (2 mm base metal) (Ref 24), S5
WC dissolution has been observed from the top to root across wt.% 41.46 12.13 1.41 28.83 16.18
the section. So, it is the heat input and not the position which at.% 43.90 3.90 6.94 29.04 16.23
determines WC dissolution. This is confirmed by WC disso- S6
wt.% 25.08 15.35 22.45 20.32 15.40
lution resulting from laser and tungsten arc during hybrid
at.% 14.80 2.75 61.59 11.41 8.61
welding (Fig. 11b to d). During hybrid welding, WC dissolu- S7
tion is observed near top surface, root surface, and the middle wt.% 30.81 13.45 22.91 26.69 4.13
section near hard metal/weld interface, as shown in Fig. 11(b) at.% 17.84 2.37 61.65 14.69 2.26
to (d). The influencing factors include stirring effects of welds, S8
high pressure of molten materials, and shielding gas of helium wt.% 32.92 9.10 24.34 28.65 2.78
and argon. at.% 18.19 1.53 62.53 15.06 1.45
WC dissolution changes carbon gradient near hard metal/ S9
weld interface, which lead to nonequivalent g phase, as wt.% 0.95 76.14 22.91 … …
indicated in Table 3. It has been confirmed that the formation at.% 0.73 81.57 17.71 … …
S10
and microstructure of g phase depend on the carbon level and
wt.% 20.90 33.20 25.83 14.03 6.05
temperature (Ref 25). Under the equilibrium condition, g phase at.% 12.28 5.93 70.58 7.84 3.37
is a ternary compound of tungsten, cobalt, and carbon that can S11
exist in two forms, either M6C or M12C (Ref 26). Moreover, the wt.% 26.33 22.99 22.07 20.60 8.01
study by Sarin (Ref 27) indicates that Co3W3C is formed at at.% 16.14 4.28 62.91 12.01 4.65
1425 C while Co6W6C formation occurred at 1000 C. So, S12
necessary thermal condition is different for M6C or M12C wt.% 21.99 44.36 14.12 13.45 6.08
formation. A large grain with a glassy, almost defect-free at.% 18.38 11.26 54.85 10.69 4.81
structure that tends to grow independent of the matrix
characterizes the morphology of Co3W3C and Co6W6C, both
of which have a cubic structure. In current study, under the gradient of carbon is large enough, carbon in c diffuses from
nonequilibrium condition, the g phase depends on the carbon W-Co-C system to weld, followed by diffusion of carbon from
level, temperature, nickel-iron ratio, and WC dissolution. When WC to c phase, thus carbon deficiency in W-Co-C system
by Harrison and Wagner (Ref 31), dynamic factors play a key Interfacial phases can adjust atomic, electron concentration,
effect on WC dissolution. When metal ion Fe+ diffusion rate in and microstructure; control and contain the electrochemical
W-Fe-C system is less than that of the W-Co-C system, potential barrier. Chemical reaction is significant factor to
boundary layer indicates staggered phases. Oppositely, bound- maintain the interface equilibrium. During the WC dissolu-
ary layer consists of mixed aggregate structure (Ref 32-34). The tion, interfaceÕs destruction and reconstruction are affected by
interfacial phases in boundary layer are primarily W-Fe-C mechanical factors and thermo-dynamics factors. Failure of
(g phases). Within, diffusion rate of metal ions are affected by thermo-dynamics stability of hard metal/weld interface
not only intrinsic diffusion rate but also stirring effects of included dissolution, diffusion and chemical reaction. This is
welds, side blown, and even high energy arc and laser beam. affected by geometry of the interface and environmental
WC dissolution in transition layer (Fig. 8b) can be explained condition. Thermal stress can be provided by physical
using transition layer theory (TL theory) proposed by Adams and property difference (thermal expansion coefficient, Elastic
Pask (Ref 32). WC dissolution in transition layer consists of hard modular) of two adjacent phases or heterogeneous temperature
metal base material, boundary layer cluster, transition layer field.
cluster. In the inner of transition layer, metal ions Ni+ and Fe+
replacing Co+ combine with W and C through ionic bond and
covalent bond. Metal ions Ni+ and Fe+ combine with Ni+, Fe+ on 5. Conclusions
the other side through metallic bond. During WC dissolution,
transition layer might be singe molecular layer or multimolecular 1. Cold cracks and hot cracks easily emerge during the
layer. If there is no transition layer, the interface bonding belongs welding of hard metal and invar alloys. On the back side
to molecular bond. Therefore, the formations of transition layer of welded joint, cold cracks easily occur near hard metal/
provide energy for WC aggregation and broken behavior. weld interface and hot cracks happen near invar/weld
According to another model proposed by Walser and Bene interface. Brittle phases such as WC-Fe (Ni, Co), WxCy
(Ref 34), the interface is not only a bridge but also a barrier. are key factors to induce cold crack initiation.
2. During laser-TIG process, laser beam not only affects the References
bead geometry but also dominates the WC dissolution.
1. G.M. Kadzioka, W. Zarek, E. Talik, and E. Popiel, Mössbauer
However, on the top surface, tungsten arc has more influ- Investigations and Photoemission Studies of the Fe 3s Spin Splitting in
ence on the range of WC dissolution in the weld than Some Fe-Ni Alloys, Acta Phys. Pol., A, 2008, 114, p 1493–1500
laser beam. 2. V.M. Nadutov, S.G. Kosintsev, O. Svystunov, V.M. Garamus,
3. WC dissolution indicates WC grain growth, WC aggrega- R. Willumeit, H. Eckerlebe, T. Ericsson, and H. Annersten, Anti-Invar
tion during welding process. There is a dynamic system Properties and Magnetic Order in fcc Fe–Ni–C Alloy, J. Magn. Magn.
Mater., 2011, 323, p 2786–2791
among larger WC, smaller WC, and liquid, which leads 3. R.R. Mulyukov, K.Y. Mulyukov, and I.M. Safarov, Effect of Severe
to WC dissolution and WC grain growth. There also Plastic Deformation on the Properties of the Fe-36% Ni Invar Alloy,
exist transition layers and boundary layers to provide Phys. Met. Metallogr., 2006, 102, p 91–96
energy for WC aggregation and nonequilibrium W-Fe-C 4. Z.W. Yang, L.X. Zhang, Q. Xue, P. He, and J.C. Feng, Interfacial
(g) formation. Microstructure and Mechanical Property of SiO2-BN Ceramics and
Invar Joint Brazed with Ag-Cu-Ti Active Filler Metal, Mater. Sci. Eng.
A, 2012, 534, p 309–313
5. V.A. Shabashov, A.V. Litvinov, N.V. Kataeva, K.A. Lyashkov, S.I.
Novikov, and S.G. Titov, Formation of Boron Solid Solution in Fe-Ni
Acknowledgments Invar Upon Severe Plastic Deformation, Phys. Met. Metallogr., 2011,
112, p 245–255
This work was supported by the National Natural Science 6. P.Q. Xu, X.J. Zhao, G.X. Xu, L.N. Li, and Z.S. Yu, Microstructure
Foundation of China (Grants Number: 51105240). PQX thanks the Characterisation and CTE Study of Fe-42Ni-Nb Invar Alloys, Mater.
Foundation support from Shanghai Municipal Education Commis- Sci. Tech Lond, 2011, 27, p 655–660
sion and Dr. L. J. Li from Utah State University for the Visiting 7. T.K. Ha, K.D. Lee, J.H. Song, and H.T. Jeong, Effect of Aging
Treatment Conditions on the Microstructure and Strength of Fe-36Ni
Research Fellowship Award, which gives him more research time Based Invar Alloy, Key Engineering Materials, The Mechanical
and opportunities. And many thanks will be given to Dr. Bishal Behavior of Materials X Part 1: 10th International Conference on the
Silwal in Utah State University for his help during paper revision. Mechanical Behaviour of Materials, Vol. 345–346, 2007, p 109–112