Gentran Machinery
Gentran Machinery
Case Study
Executive Summary
The company Gentran Mahinery Inc. produces heavy machinery for manufacturing, mining and construction operations. The company had set up an international manufacturing joint venture in China with the Chinese State Corporation. Just six months into operation, there were major hurdles the partners had to deal with: cultural, language and management problems. The conflicts between the two sides were further incensed by the lack of Western exposure to Chinese managers and the strict hierarchical management system in the Chinese side of the joint venture. The Executive Assistant at the Hong Kong office, Bill Stevenson visited the joint venture in China and prepared a detailed report on the various issues making recommendation on the following aspects: (a) the general manager's position, power and authority in the joint venture, (b) the organizational design of the joint venture, (c) clarification of the responsibility of both parties, (d) reward system and appraisal system, (e) how to deal with both the Chinese and American incompetent managers, (f) how to deal with the communication problems, both language and cultural, and (g) final comprehensive and position outline of the potential of the joint venture.
Page 1
Root Causes Lack of translators as there is a serious language barrier between the American and the Chinese workers. The middle management is not convinced that the top management would be willing to give up their powers, to adapt to the new system. Hence they do not feel enthusiastic about the new system. Organizational Make up, Appraisal and Reward Related issues No concept of chain of command, people indulging in Guan Xi Lack of coordination between departments Chinese workers believe in No work/ No Money whereas both the managements want to implement a new reward and Appraisal system which eliminates the No Work/No Money philosophy. Root Cause The Chinese Managers are used to working in an environment where the usual way of working involves the top management making the decision and use of politics to influence the decisions (Guan Xi). The management is finding it very difficult to change a thinking embedded for 40 years especially in an environment of mistrust. Hr related Issues Mismatch in the required KSA of the position and the people appointed in them There is little life for managers outside the plant for the managers which are leading to low morale, alcoholism and loneliness. Root Cause The Appointments to the posts on the Chinese side were arbitrary in nature, the perception was that undesired employees were shunted out by the main company into the JV project. The managers are put up away from the main city there is little interaction between the American employees and the Chinese counterparts.
Based on these CSF to measure performance effectiveness the company needs to establish KPIs indicative of each factor.
Recommendations
Removal of Power Centers: Mandatory measures Have a meeting between The GM and The Board to clearly demarcate role. Where in the board must have only advisory powers and the GM takes all decisions regarding the strategy and policy of the company. The GM needs to clearly outline the change process in a policy document that needs to be circulated among all the workers in the JV. Alternatives Available Removal of Wang Peng, Zhang Yan as AGM: Offer VRS to Wang Peng and a membership on The Board as an employee representative. Promote Zhang Yan to the position of AGM op and Eng. to leverage his contacts with the union and workers. He is also progressive thinking and in tune with the new responsible system the management wants to implement. Wang Peng as the GM,Jim Olenuk as AGM: If there is a need for a strong leader move Wang Peng as the GM, Jim Olenuk as the AGM and transfer Jack Bertlet. Also stress to Jim the importance of him needing to work with Wang Peng, Also Wang peng needs to be bought onboard to adopt a more open way of working. Sack Wang Peng, promote Zhang Yan as AGM: Remove Wang Peng from the position of AGM and also promote Zhang Yan to the post of AGM.
Decision Criteria Based upon the CSF we can establish decision criteria for the alternative as Positive Effect on cultural integration Positive Effect on development of local managers Positive Effect on co-ordination between the Chinese and American managers Positive Effect on relationship with government agencies
On evaluating the alternatives it is evident that alternative 1 is the most appropriate option.
Page 4
New reward and appraisal system Based on the CSF KPIs have been identified. Critical Success Factors KPIs Effective communication between the Level of language course attended two partners No of Knowledge training Sessions conducted Development of local managers No of trainings attended by his sub-ordinates Integrating cultures and traditions into a No of suggestions given by the team consistent company policy implemented into action Good relationship with government Level of compliance with government laws agencies For each manager these KPIs should form a part of the Appraisal-Reward system.
Page 5
Action Plan
Have a meeting between The GM and The Board to clearly demarcate role. The GM needs to clearly outline and circulate the change process in a policy document. Move Wang Peng to the Board; promote Zhang Yan to the position of AGM op and Eng. Hire translators for each department who work closely with both the American and Chinese teams Have sessions to educate the management on the new system. Conduct open forum town hall meetings Introduce a new reward and appraisal system based upon the CSFs identified
Each manager should undergo a basic managerial course in the field of all other departments
Develop a company database where every individual KSAs are maintained. Certain recreation facilities like sports, library, movie screening within the premise should be develop. Assign a HR personnel who should be responsible for planning & scheduling the trainings require in different units of the organization
Page 6
Page 7