Philosophy of Business Ethics Midterm Study Guide (Silverman)
Philosophy of Business Ethics Midterm Study Guide (Silverman)
Philosophy of Business Ethics Midterm Study Guide (Silverman)
1) Define:
Relativism
Egoism (Ethical)
-Ethical & psychological theory, advocates individual self-interest as guiding
principle.
-A consequentialist theory: determines if an action was correct by the result
(positive outcome = correct act).
Ethical Egoism
Everyone should go out there and maximize results for one’s self (e.g. but
doesn’t mean go kill people to protect yourself)
Psychological Egoism
People are motivated by self interest
Utilitarianism
-Maximizing happiness for everyone on a long-term scale.
-Emphasis on results.
-A consequentialist theory: determines if an action was correct by the result
(positive outcome = correct act).
Kantianism
-Do not use people (“means and “ends)
-Emphasis on principles.
-A non-consequentialist theory: What matters is the nature of the act itself, not
just its end results.
Universal Law
-Only will people with principles (whether or not they’re principles you’d
live by)
-Ask yourself, is the action compatible with dignity?
-Ask yourself, if everybody did this action, would the world fall apart?
2) Give an argument for and against:
Relativism
(argument)
-That’s the way the world should be.
(cons)
-Theory implies lack of moral progression
-If you’re an ethical relativist, you’re immoral.
Egoism
(argument)
-You know what your own desires and needs are, so each person should go
pursue their own happiness rather than try to guess what pleases other
people.
(cons)
-Life might become short
-Ignores blatant wrongs
Psychological Egoism
(cons)
-Accuses people of selfishness, e.g. when being nice to others, you’re only
being nice to others because it makes you feel good about yourself.
Utilitarianism
(argument)
-Benefits everyone, regardless of route chosen to accomplish goal.
(cons)
-e.g. Violating the rights of 1 person just to promote happiness of 10
people
-If you believe people have rights, there’s something unjust about
exploiting 1 person for the rest.
Kantianism
(argument)
(cons)
Implies you should never lie, but if you were living in Nazi Germany, it
would be a good idea to lie.
7) Compare / Contrast:
Utilitarian – Theory of Justice
-Aims at happiness for everyones
2. Profit Motive
(people do the things they do bc they expect a reward. If a share of the profit is
not given to workers, they will not be driven to succeed.)
3. Competition
4. Private Property
-Companies splitting stocks up among shareholders.
-(John Locke: we should enjoy the fruits of our efforts)
3. Exploitation
-Employees get no credit / acknowledgement on each product they make, e.g. consumer
won’t know the product they purchased was done by the worker “Batool”
-There’s something detaching about labor workers who are not credited
-e.g. Lots of people died building the Empire State Building
4. Hard to Break in
-Hard for small “mom & pop” shops to break into the Targets and the Wal-Marts.
5. Corporate Welfare
-When big companies break laws, politicians tend to waive punishment to save jobs of all
their workers – which in turn politician has a higher chance of being re-elected.
-Saves the company’s ass when they broke the law.
12) The basis for 2 different types of rights:
John Stuart Mill
1. Negative Rights
-Importance of liberty and rights without government interference.
Karl Marx
2. Positive Rights
-The right to receive something (this is not a right for protection)
Aquinas
-Justice is a virtue every person can develop
-Justice deals with interactions with other people, which is why people can be
trained to develop it.