CUSTOMER LOYALTY : THE CASE OF MOBILE PHONE USERS IN UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA Prepared by

Meguellati Achour Pn. Nor Pujawati Md. Said

Dr. Ali Boerhannueddin

Abstract Service quality, switching barriers, and brand image are the major antecedents of customer loyalty, and loyal customers may buy more, accept higher prices and have a positive word-ofmouth effect. Also we know that the cost of selling to new customers is much higher than the cost of selling to existing customers, also the cost of attract new customers is much higher than the cost protect existing customers ten times. Although this fact is apparent to everyone, many companies are still losing customers at a formidable rate. In this context the main aim of this research is to examine the relationships between these factors and customer loyalty in the Universiti Utara Malaysia sector. Based on the theoretical model, a comprehensive set of hypotheses were formulated and a methodology for testing them was outlined. These hypotheses were tested empirically by questionnaires to demonstrate the applicability of the theoretical model. The results indicate that service quality, switching barriers, and brand image are separate constructs that combine to determine the loyalty, with service quality and switching barriers exerting a stronger influence than brand image. Finally hypotheses H1, H2 were supported, while hypothesis H3 was rejected. Keywords: Customer Loyalty, Brand Image, Switching Barriers, Service Quality, Mobile Telecommunication

Introduction

Attract customers and satisfy them has become a hot issue and expresses present of organizations and the reason of its existing. Customer loyalty has become more important as rapid technology changes in telecommunications. Your customers know what is available elsewhere. They may know other locations, and they may be willing to travel far for a bargain. A critical issue for the continued success of organizations is its capability to retain its current customers and make them loyal to its brands (Dekimpe et al., 1997). Loyal customers build businesses by buying more, paying premium prices, and providing new referrals through positive word of mouth over time (Ganesh et al., 2000). Loyalty research in services is an important area to study (Gremler, 1995). In fact, companies in telecommunications are losing 2-4 percent of their customers monthly; disloyal customers can amount to millions of lost revenue and profit. For example 20% of customers of the mobile phone operator orange defect each year and, on average it cost orange 256 in 1996 to recruit each new customer, reflecting the cost of introductory offers, subsidized phones and advertising. With almost a million customers, therefore, reducing the churn rate from 20% to 10% would bring about annual savings of over 25 million (Palmer, 1998). In the same way, studies conducted in the financial services industry show that increasing customer retention (or customer loyalty) by 5 percent could lead to 25-75 percent profit growth (Chan et al., 2001, p. 5):

Especially in telecommunications services, it is frequently pointed out that once customers have been acquired and connected to the telecommunications network of a particular

operator; their long-term relations with the focal operator are of greater importance to the success of the company in competitive markets than they are in other industry sectors (Gerpott et al., 2001). In case of Malaysia many studies have done about customer loyalty in several services. According to Nilson (2007) reported that in study applied on a sample 220 bank customers in Malaysia. Multiple regression analysis assessed the impact on customer loyalty of four key constructs of relationship marketing (trust, commitment, communication and conflict handling). The findings of this study The four variables have a significant effect and predict a good proportion of the variance in customer loyalty. Moreover, they are significantly related to one another. Also Chang Ee Ling and Ernest (2009) in study - Satisfaction and Loyalty: Customer Perceptions of Malaysian Telecommunication Service Providers- by utilizing a two-part research method. The first part utilized an in-depth interview method to obtain variables used in the second part of the study. The second part consisted of a questionnaire distributed to 125 respondents. A factor analysis is also carried out. Findings indicate that important variables for satisfaction included, supporting services, product (handy, reliable coverage, friends and family lines) and promotional efforts of the firm; while for loyalty, they refer to convenience, services, satisfaction and cost. The findings indicate that telecommunication service providers should look beyond price wars to keep their customers satisfied and loyal. As market growth slows or as markets become more competitive, firms are more likely to attempt to maintain their market share by focusing on retaining current customers. . In this context the main objective of this research is to examine the relationships between customer loyalty and service quality, switching barriers and brand image at Universiti Utara Malaysia sector, and there are three specific objectives of this research-1- To determine the

relationship between service quality and customer loyalty, 2- To determine the relationship between switching barriers and customer loyalty, and 3- To determine the relationship between brand image and customer loyalty. This research tries to answer following questions: What is the relationship between service quality and customer loyalty? What is the relationship between switching barriers and customer loyalty? What is the relationship between brand image and customer loyalty?

The Importance of Research Customer loyalty is about retaining customers, which means earning more. Various researches have already shown that companies need to focus on customer retention more than grabbing new customers. It is more difficult retaining a customer than it is getting a new one (Mayank, 2001). Increasing competition in the global market of production and distribution of goods and services, as well as challenges of globalization created difficulty in obtaining customer, so, therefore, the organizations become more care, satisfaction, maintain, and make more loyal for customer to the organization. Building loyalty to the company is very important, also is not just simple function for department of marketing, but is philosophy and a way of thinking for how attract customers and how satisfaction them even loyalty, and this is responsibility of all staff in organization.

Literature Review

The description of the research already introduced, in literature review will focus on the discussion and ideas in previous studies related to customer loyalty and the factors that affecting on it. There are several definitions of customer loyalty. Customer loyalty is defined as a customer who repurchases from the same service provider whenever possible, and who continues to recommend or maintains a positive attitude towards the service provider (Bloemer et al. 1999, Gremler and Brown 1999, Shoemaker and Lewis 1999, Kandampully and Suhartanto 2000). According to Wong and Sohal (2003a) customer loyalty appears to consist of three separate dimensions, namely, the behavioral, attitudinal and cognitive dimensions. Customer loyalty has been generally described as occurring when customers: 1- repeatedly purchase goods or service over time, and, 2- hold favorable attitudes towards goods or service, or towards the company supplying the goods or service (Wong and Sohal, 2003b). Customer loyalty has been studied for several decades by marketers but it is not a well understood phenomenon (Gremler, 1995). Furthermore, there is no consensus on the most appropriate way to measure loyalty. Three groups of studies reflect both the major approaches to defining and/or measuring customer loyalty and the limitation of these approaches. These three groups are: (1) loyalty as repeat purchase behavior (e.g., Liljander and Strandvik, 1993), (2) a composite approache of repeat patronage combine with an attitudinal component (e.g, Dick and Basu, 1994), and (3) a psychological state of loyalty (e.g, Czepiel, 1990a). The first approach is to treat loyalty as either actual purchase behavior or repeat purchase intentions. This approach has long been criticized for leading to spurious loyalty (Day, 1969) while the composite approach lacks theory (Jacoby and Chestnut, 1978). Customers may be loyal due to high switching barriers or lack of real alternatives. Customers may also be loyal because they are

satisfied and thus want to continue the relationship. History has proven that most barriers to exit are limited with regard to durability; companies tend to consider customer satisfaction the only viable strategy in order to keep existing customers. Several authors have found a positive correlation between customer satisfaction and loyalty (Bearden, Teel et al. 1980; Bolton and Drew 1991; Fornell 1992; Anderson and Sullivan 1993). Customer loyalty is a buyers overall attachment or deep commitment to a product, service, brand, or organization (Oliver, 1999). Customer loyalty fall into two broad categories: the behavior and the attitude. As a behavior, customer loyalty has been measured as the longterm choice probability for a brand, including hard-core loyalty, repeat purchase probability. Attitudinal approaches focused mainly on brand recommendations, resistance to superior products, repurchase intention, and willingness to pay a price premium. Oliver, (1999) defines loyalty as a deeply held commitment to re-buy product/service consistently in the future, thereby causing repetitive same brand or same-brand set purchasing. The customer attitude toward a service or product (brand) including attitudinal preference and commitment has a greater impact on forming loyalty (Goodwin and Gremler, 1996) cite quality in a relationship as a necessary element in defining loyalty. Earlier studies of factors affecting on customer loyalty usually set the focus on customer satisfaction and the switching barrier (e.g., Dick & Basu, 1994; Gerpott, Rams, & Schindler, 2001; Lee & Cunningham, 2001). Customers experiencing a high level of satisfaction are likely to remain with their existing providers and maintain their subscription. However, according to some research, customer satisfaction, while positively influencing customer loyalty, is not always a sufficient condition, and, in some cases, fails to produce the expected

effect. Hence, these researchers suggest that it is necessary to analyze other potentially influential factors. It is in this context that the concept of the switching barrier was proposed (Jones, Mothersbaugh, & Betty, 2002). From all previous studies about customer loyalty and the factors that affecting on it such as service quality, switching barriers, and brand image, all researchers gave several definitions of customer loyalty, each definition expect type of product or service, but there are some things are similarity between their definitions as, repeatedly purchase a goods or service over time; and hold favorable attitudes towards a goods or service, or towards the company supplying the goods or service. But the deference between their definitions are the factors that affecting on customer loyalty for example the factors that affecting on loyalty to cars are deferent the factors that affecting on loyalty on mobile phone or any product that consume it daily, monthly or yearly, as mentioned by (Jun and Bin, 2005).

Factors affecting on customer loyalty

The customer loyalty is characterized by repurchasing and not transferring by the fluctuation of the market. There are many factors that affect the customer loyalty. In the telecommunication industry, according to opinions of the experts and literatures previous studies, the effects of customer loyalty can be assessed in these aspects: service quality, switching barriers, and brand image "the customers switching cost requirement, quality requirement and service requirement for the telecommunication business" (LI Li, 2005).

Service Quality and Customer Loyalty

Service quality in telecom industry is an important indicator to assess a companys performance. Service quality in the telecommunications has mainly been researched on the technical and/or on corporate strategies (Douligeris & Pereira, 1994; Gruber, Abdou, Richards, & Williams, 1986; Jung, 1996a; 1996b; Lim, Widdows, & Park, 2006; Lynch, Buzas & Berg, 1994; Takahashi, 1988). Due to the inherent intangibility, inseparability, heterogeneity and perishability of characters, service quality can be defined as a consumers overall impression of the relative efficiency of the organization and its services. The dominant conceptualization and measurement of service quality has been SERVQUAL instrument developed by Parasuman et al. (1988). SERVQUAL was identified determinants of perceived quality and indicated by the arithmetic differences between customer expectations and perceptions across the 22 measurement items. Using factor analysis, SERVQUAL further is condensed into tangible, reliability, assurance and empathy dimensions, which are generic across service contexts. However, a number of authors investigated the number of dimensions and stability of items across different industries by empirical tests. They conclude that the five component factor structure is not confirmed in any of the research samples. This implies that service quality attributes are contextdependent and should be selected to reflect the service environment investigated Cronin et al (1992, 2002) criticized SERVQUAL poor reliability and argued that expectation is neither sufficient nor necessary condition, therefore identified a performance-only measurement, called SERVPERF instrument. The results of existing studies on service quality suggest that the definitions of service quality in mobile telecom setting are quite diverse, and do not seem to fit any single existing

quality model. In this study, for the sake of brevity, modified SERVPERF instrument has been adapted for mobile telecom industry (Zhijian Huanl, et, al, 2005).

The Switching Barriers and Customer Loyalty The switching barrier refers to the difficulty of switching to another provider that is encountered by a customer who is dissatisfied with the existing service, or to the financial, social and psychological burden felt by a customer when switching to a new carrier (Fornell, 1992). Therefore, the higher the switching barrier, the more a customer is forced to remain with his or her existing carrier. According to a previous study, the switching barrier is made up of switching cost, the attractiveness of alternatives, and interpersonal relationships. Switching cost means the cost incurred when switching, including time, money and psychological cost. (Jackson, 1985) categorized switching costs as psychological, physical, and economic in nature. In addition to objectively measurable monetary costs, switching costs may also pertain to time and psychological effort involved in facing the uncertainty of dealing with a new service provider. According to (Burnhams, 1998) review and typology, switching costs were broadly grouped into three categories: procedure, financial and relational, Attractiveness of alternatives means the reputation, image and service quality of the replacing carrier, which are expected to be superior or more suitable than those of the existing carrier. Interpersonal relationship means a psychological and social relationship that manifests itself as care, trust, intimacy and communication. Switching barriers lock customer in his initial decision, which entail to market power to service supplier. Thus, suppliers can hinder his customer to churn to his

rival for relative low price and can segment and discriminate its customer with different willing to pay. No matter how, suppliers can exploit his customer. Switching barriers can deteriorate offensive "fir" interest in acquisition of new customer campaign because firm must pay off extra to compensate it, which no exist in market without switching barriers. (MK, Kim, 2004), so, Switching cost means the cost that consumers pay when they shift to use products and service of other operators. It includes not only the study cost that consumers pay to familiarize the service of other operators but also the cost of sacrificing the original phone number value and accumulated scores of service (Liang, et al, 2005). Switching costs are partly consumer-specific (Shy, 2002). For this reason, a switching cost can be seen as a cost that deters customers from demanding a rival firms brand. The economic or financial switching cost is a sunk cost which appears when the customer changes his/her brand, for example the costs of closing an account with one bank and opening another with a competitor, the cost of changing ones long-distance telephone service (Klemperer, 1987) or the costs of changing ones GSM operator.

Brand Image and Customer Loyalty Oliver (1999) proposes that eventual customer loyalty is a role of perceived product superiority, personal fortitude, social bonding, and their synergistic effects. Further analysis of Olivers discussion tend to suggest not that loyalty is commitment, but that loyalty is an aspect of commitment called attitudinal or emotional component of commitment (Meyer and Allen, 1991, 1997; Meyer et al., 1993; Ogba, 2008).A brands image often influences a customers expectations and consequently satisfaction with a product or service. Brand image pertains to the perception or mental picture a customer holds of a brand and is formed

10

through his/her response, whether reasoned or emotional, an organization's image is an important variable that positively influences marketing activities. Image is considered to have the ability to influence customers' perception of the goods and services offered (Zeithaml and Bitner, 1996). Thus, image will have an impact on customers' buying behavior. The objective is to arouse a positive affective response to the brand in the customers, such that they buy brands for their physical attributes and functions, and their symbolic meanings associated with the brand, product or service. During its formation, the customers experiences, feelings and trust will influence the image. (Nguyen and Leblanc, 2001) claim that corporate image is related to the physical and behavioral attributes of the firm, such as business name, architecture, variety of products/services, and to the impression of quality communicated by each person interacting with the firms clients.

From the marketing literature of goods we have learned that brand reputation has been defined as a perception of quality associated with the name (Aaker and Keller 1990). Corporate image in the service marketing literature was early identified as an important factor in the overall evaluation of the service and the company (Grnroos, 1984); (Gummesson and Grnroos, 1988); (Bitner, 1991). Apart from image as a function of accumulation of purchasing/consumption experience over time, most organizations also provide complex and noisy informational environments (e.g. advertising, direct marketing, or PR) in order to attract new and keep existing customers. In the Perceived Quality Model (Grnroos 1988) perceived quality is a function of expected quality (generated from market communication, image, word-of mouth, and customer needs) and experienced quality (generated from technical quality and functional quality). Mobile Telecommunications

11

markets can be divided by the type of services provided and by the telecommunications network used (Gerpott et al., 2001).

Hypotheses and structural model H1: Service Quality has positive impact on customer loyalty. H2: Switching Barriers has positive impact on customer loyalty. H3: Brand Image has positive impact on customer loyalty.

Service Quality

Switching Barriers

Custome r Loyalty

Brand Image

Methodology:

This study involved a survey of users of a mobile phone service in North University of Malaysia. The methodology comprises six majors' topics areas. These topics are research design, population; sample size and sample method, hypothesis of the research, questionnaires design, analysis method and result of reliability. There are two types of

12

customer loyalty-for company and for product. This research focusing customer loyalty for product, and also will focus on three factors such as service quality, switching barriers, and brand image. For that considered three hypotheses for determine the relationship between those factors and customer loyalty, furthermore the customer loyalty is dependent variable, and other factors are independents variables. The questionnaires was pre-tested with twenty users of mobile phone consist of staff and students at North University of Malaysia. The purpose of the research was explained to the users of mobile phone in an effort to facilitate users feedback, suggestions, and answering about the questions. The users suggested that some words in the questions were not clear and straight forward. Except for these comments, the results of the pretest indicated that, overall, the questions are realistic, clear, and easy to follow. After the pretest, unclear words and sentences were revised.

Population of this research is the staff and students users of mobile phone in North University of Malaysia (UUM). The population size is 28790 users. Based on Sekaran (1992), therefore sample size of this research is 378 users. However only 150 have valid responses were obtained. The no-probability sampling was used and the sampling method used is convenience sampling. Convenience samples are the most common form of sampling design in social science research (Mohr, 1990) and provide researchers with an acceptable database to use statistical inference techniques. This approach to sampling design is also common in services marketing. The questionnaires were distributed at the library and the students Affairs Department where students are likely to gather foyer between classes.

13

There are two main sections in the questionnaires, the first section- the demographic characteristics of the respondents. These characteristics are: age group, gender, highest level of education, marital status, and the career. The second section of the questionnaires is the dependent variable- customer loyalty, and three independent variables- service quality, switching barriers and brand image. There are thirty five questions in this section, eight questions for customer loyalty, eleven questions for service quality, eight questions for switching barriers, and eight questions for brand image. The constructs in the demographic were measured using a multiple-item measurement scale. Measures for independent and dependent variables used a five-point Likert-type response format, with strongly disagree and strongly agree as the anchors. The users recorded their assessment of the items on five-point Likert-type scales (1= strongly disagree, 2= disagree, 3= neutral, 4= agree, 5= strongly agree). The descriptive analysis of the variables customer loyalty, service quality, switching barriers, and brand image in this research used three hypotheses for test to assess the relationship between the independent variables and dependent variable. The correlation is one of the most common and most useful statistics. A correlation is a single number that describes the degree of relationship between two variables. In this research it described the degree of relationship between all independent variables and dependent variable. Regression analysis is a statistical tool for the investigation of relationships between variables. The goal of regression analysis is to determine the values of parameters for a function that cause the function to best fit a set of data observations that you provide. In this research to determine the relationship between customer loyalty and service quality, the relationship between customer loyalty and switching barriers, also the relationship between customer loyalty and brand image.

14

Reliability Results

The result of reliability is as tabled below: Table 1.1: Reliability Results Number Variables Independent Variables Service Quality Switching Barriers Brand Image Dependent Variable Customer Loyalty of item Alpha Std. D 4.919 5.551 4.505 Mean 40.24 29.30 28.00

11 8 8

.785 .757 .810

.778

5.210

27.47

The reliability test was conducted. Coefficient Cronbachs Alpha is a measure of reliability or internal consistency. A value of Cronbachs Alpha of .50 or above is consistent with the recommended minimum values stated by Nunnally (1967). Cronbachs alpha indicating reliability for each factor: customer loyalty: .778, service quality: .785, switching barriers: . 757, brand image: .810. Therefore the research results can be accepted as related by Nunnally (1978).

15

Findings

Demographic variables The respondents are male (43.30%) and female (56.7%)., their age vary from 18-25 years (84.0%), 26-35 years (10.0%), 36-45 years (4.0%), and others are (0.7%), in marital status single (84.7%), and married (15.3%). In terms of the education level of the respondents were high school (24.7%), diploma (9.3%), degree (54.7%), and postgraduate (10.7%). The sample consists of students (87.3%), staff (12.0%) and lecturers (0.7%). All results are in the table bellow:

Table 1.2: Demographic Results Frequency 126 15 6 3 85 65 37 14 Percent (%) 84 10 4 0.21 56.7 43.3 24.7 9.3

Age

18-28 26-35 36-45 46 and over Female Male High School Diploma

Gender Education level

16

Degree

83 16 127 23 131 18 1

54.7 10.7 84.7 15.3 87.3 12.0 0.7

Marital Status career

Postgraduate Single Married Student Staff Lecturer

Correlation analysis Table 1.3: Correlation Matrix Customer Loyalty

Variables

Service Quality

Switching Barriers

Brand Image

Customer Loyalty Service Quality Switching Barriers

.561** .516**

1 .718** 1

17

Brand .382** .610** Image **. Significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed)

.599**

Table 1.3 exhibits the correlation coefficients between all variables. All independent variables are correlated significantly customer loyalty. The correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). The criterion used for the level of significance was set a priori. The relationship must be at least significant at **P 0.01. Table 1.3 shows that there is significant correlation between customer loyalty and service quality, (r=0.561, p=0.000<0.01). Therefore, there is a strong positive significant correlation between customer loyalty and switching barriers, (r=0.516, p=0.000<0.01). Therefore, there is a strong positive significant correlation between customer loyalty and switching. There is significant correlation between customer loyalty and brand image, (r=0.382, p=0.000<0.01). Therefore, there is a moderate positive significant correlation between customer loyalty and brand image.

Regression Analysis
The linear regression procedure examines the relationship between a dependent variable and a set of independent variable. In this research also analyze the relationship between customer loyalty and service quality, switching barriers, and brand image using regression analysis, and getting the results in table 1.4. Table 1.4: Regression Matrix Independent Variables Service Quality (t-value) 0.396 sig 0.000

18

Switching Barriers Brand Image R Square Adjusted R Square

(3.843) 0.232 (2.301) 0.004 (0.044) 0.341 0.327

0.023 0.965

Finally, as expected from the table 1.4, the results out that all independent variables are positively correlated with customer loyalty. However, the coefficient on brand image is not statistically significant. This implies that customer loyalty and brand image is unrelated. But the coefficient on service quality and switching barriers are statistically significant. This implies that customer loyalty and service quality and switching barriers are related; by using values of table 1.4 the researcher investigate the influence of service quality, switching barriers, and brand image. As expected, service quality (=0.392, t-value=3.843, p<0.01) and switching barriers (=0.232, t-value=2.301, p<0.001) had a significant and strong positive influence on customer loyalty. However, brand image had no significant influence on customer loyalty (=0.004, t-value=0.044, p=0.965) at the 0.05 level. Thus, hypotheses H1, H2 were supported, while hypothesis H3 was rejected. The researcher found that the proposed model explained a significant percentage of variance in loyalty (R Square=34%).

Discussion
In hypotheses H1, H2, and H3 the researcher investigates the influence of service quality, switching barriers, and brand image on loyalty. The Pearson coefficient for the relationship between customer loyalty and service quality is .561, so there is relationship between customer loyalty and service quality, and it is moderate and positive. The finding is supported by Huan et al., (2005) and Aydin and Ozer (2004): the hypothesis (H1) is 19

accepted. Service quality is significant impact on customer loyalty appeared to be call quality, value-added services, and customer support. This suggests that, while mobile carriers have improved call quality over the past several years through massive equipment investments, call clarity and coverage, according to customers perceptions, still retain their importance. In addition, mobile carriers must concentrate their efforts on developing valueadded services to increase enjoyment and convenience. In the area of customer support, carriers must strive to minimize customer inconvenience by speedily processing customers complaints through a variety of systems and channels. The Pearson coefficient for the relationship between customer loyalty and switching barriers is .516, so there is relationship between customer loyalty and switching barriers, and it is moderate and positive. Thus switching barriers positively related to customer loyalty. Switching barriers is positively and significantly related to customer loyalty (p=0.023<0.01) and based on the results of previous studies as Huan et al.,(2005) and Aydin. S and Ozer. G (2004): the hypothesis (H2) is accepted and supported. Switching barriers is significant impact on customer loyalty appeared to switching costs such as loss cost, move-in cost, and interpersonal relationships. Carriers must continuously develop customer reward programs that concretely compensate customers, such as mileage programs and price discounts, in order to increase loss cost and move-in cost. Further, interpersonal relationships between carrier and customer are factors that retain customers, even when competitors try to win them over with lower prices or offers of other conveniences. The Pearson coefficient for the relationship between customer loyalty and brand image is . 382, so there is relationship between customer loyalty and brand image, and it is low and

20

positive. Although the correlation was weak, it still showed a positive relationship between customer loyalty and brand image. Brand image is not statistically significant. (p=0.965>0.01) and based on the results of previous studies as (Aydin and Ozer, 2004): the hypothesis (H3) is rejected. Although it is not significant, the analysis results indicate that corporate image affects positively customer loyalty. The general experience of marketing professionals also verifies that such an effect is valid. The situation can be explained by the general characteristics of Malaysia mobile phone market, since the purchasing power of subscribers is less than in developed countries, and the indirect tax rate in the brands sector is relatively higher in Malaysia. Consequently, the most important factor for the decision making process of subscribers is services provided by operator compared to cost. The operators image has no significant effect on customer loyalty in the Malaysia brands sector.

Recommendation

Several new ideas arose while pursuing the purpose of this research with following recommendations: Service quality and switching barriers are two important routes to customer loyalty for most service companies, either in retaining or attracting customers. Research related to the importance of service quality and switching barriers in attracting new customers to the company and how this may change between different service industries is in dire need. In the emerging paradigm of relationship marketing, need to understand the importance of service quality and switching barrier in retaining customers. The researcher focused on the impact brand image, switching barriers, and service quality on customer loyalty. One problem is estimating existing customers experience with and perception of the company is the

21

closeness of the two constructs. This may create validity problems. Research related to construct, i.e., finding good measures of service quality, brand image, switching barriers and loyalty is therefore required. This research just covered 34% from area of the factors that affecting on customer loyalty, so there are some recommendations and advises: To employ other variables such as commitment, satisfaction, and trust as the

factors affecting customer loyalty. To replicate the investigation, to explain other regions or countries in order to

obtain a broader view and analysis. Conduct an in-depth research about the profitability of loyal customers in

comparison to the costs of retaining them. Explore if responsiveness to the marketing efforts really have an effect on the

customers buying behavior.

Conclusion
In this research, the relationship between customer loyalty and service quality, switching barriers and brand image is examined. To this end, the data was analyzed by correlation and regression analysis. The results of the regression analysis show that all of the factors have positive effects on customer loyalty. For example, the effect of service quality on customer loyalty stems from the positive relations between service quality and such factors as brand image and switching barriers. Although it is not significant, the analysis results indicate that brand image affects positively customer loyalty. The general experience of marketing professionals also verifies that such an effect is valid. The situation can be explained by the

22

general characteristics of Malaysia mobile phone market, since the purchasing power of subscribes is less than in developed countries. Customer loyalty is the dependent variable in the regression analysis. The objective of regression analysis was to determine which of the three factors would have the most important influence on customer loyalty. The three relations were hypothesized to influence customer loyalty; there are two significantly and positively- service quality and switching barriers, but brand image not significantly. Notice that the Pearson coefficient for the relationship between customer loyalty and service quality is .561, and it is positive. This tells us that, just as predicted, as service quality increases, customer loyalty increases. The Pearson coefficient for the relationship between customer loyalty and switching barriers is .516, and it is positive. Therefore too, as switching barriers increases, customer loyalty increases. On conclusion, service quality and switching barriers is important predictor of customer loyalty.

References
Aaker, D., and K. L. Keller (1990). Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extentions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1): 27-41. Aaker, D. A., (1991). Managing Brand Equity. New York: The Free Pres Ahire, S. L., and Golhar. D.Y., and Waller. M. A. (1996), Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27(1): 23-56. Ahmad, R., and Buttle. F. (2002). Customer retention management: A reflection of theory and practice. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 20(3):149-161 Andreassen. T. W. (1997). Customer Loyalty and Complex Services: The Impact of Corporate Image on Quality, Customer Satisfaction and loyalty for

23

Customers with Varying Degrees of Service Expertise. The International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(4) Andreassen, T.W., and Bredal, D. (1996), Kundepleie i Praksis. Relasjonsmarkedsfring p for brukermarkedet, AdNotam Gyldendal Forlag as, Oslo. Andreassen, T. W. (1995). Small, High Cost Countries Strategy for Attracting MNCs Global Investments. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 8(3). Anderson, E. and M. Sullivan (1993). The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms. Marketing Science, 12 (2): 125143. Anderson, E. W. C., and Fornell et al. (1994). Customer Satisfaction, Market Share and Profitability: Findings From Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(July): 53-66. Anderson, J. C., and Narus. J.A. (1990). A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54(January): 42-58. Anderson, Erin and Barton Weitz. (1992). The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 24 (February): 18-34. Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth. Journal of Service Research, 1(1): 5-17. Annie, H. Liu. Mark P. Leach. Kenneth L. Bemhnrdrb (2005). Examining customer value perceptions of organizational buyers when sourcing from multiple vendors. Journal of Business Research, (58): 59-568 Asuncion, B. and, Josefa. D. M. Augustin. Q. (2004). A model of customer loyalty in the retail banking market. European Journal of Marketing, 38(1/2): 253-275. Aydin, S., and Ozer. G. (2004). The analysis of antecedents of customer loyalty in the Turkish mobile telecommunication market. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8): 910-925 Bagozzi, R.P, and Yi. Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(Spring): 77-94. Balmer, J. M. T. (2001). Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing - Seeing through the fog. European Journal of Marketing,

24

35(3/4): 248-291. Balmer, J. M. T., and Gray, E.R. (1999). Corporate identity and corporate communications: creating a competitive advantage. Corporate communications: An International Journal, 4(4):171-177. Barber, F., and Campbell, J.D. (2001). Layoffs: Creating or destroying shareholder value? Ivey Business Journal, 66(1):13. Barich, H., and Kotler. P. (1991). A framework for marketing image management. Sloan Management Review, 32(2): 94-104. Barn, J. G. C. (1997). Examining the Nature of Relationships between Providers of Financial Services and Their Retail Customer. Psychology and Marketing, 14(8): 764-790 Bearden, W., J. Teel, et al. (1980). A Path Model of Consumer Complaint Behavior. Marketing in the 80s. R. B. e. al. Beaton, M., and Beaton, C. (1995). Marrying Service Providers and their Clients: a Relationship Approach to Services Management. Journal of Marketing Management. 11: 55-70. Bell, S. J., and Auh. S. and, Smalley. K. (2005). Customer Relationship Dynamics: Service Quality and Customer Loyalty in the Context of Varying Levels of Customer Expertise and Switching Costs Customer Relationship. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33: 169 Bendapudi, N. and Berry. L. L. (1997). Customers motivations for maintaining relationships with service providers. Journal of Retailing, 73(1): 1537. Benjamin, O. E. (2006). Correlates of customer loyalty to their bank: a case study in Nigeria. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 24(7): 494-508 Bennett, R. and Gabriel, H. (2001). Reputation, trust and supplier commitment: The case of shipping organization/seaport relations. The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 16(6/7): 424-438. Bentler, P.M, and Bonett. D. G. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin. 107(2): 238-46. Bloemer, J., Ruyter, K. and Wetzels, M. (1998). On the relationship between perceived service quality, service loyalty and switching costs,

25

International Journal of Industry Management, 9(5): 436-53. Bolton, R. N., and J. H. Drew (1991). A Multistage Model of Customers Assesment of Service Quality and Value. Journal of Consumer Research, 54(April): 69-82. Bolton, R. N, and Drew. J. H. (1991). A multistage model of customers assessment of service quality and value. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4): 365 84. Bowen, J.T., and Chen, S. (2001). The relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(5): 213- 217. Brady, M.K., Cronin. J. J., and Hult, G.T.M. (2001). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76 (2): 193-218. Brown, S. W., and Bond, E. U. (1995). The Internal Market/External Market Framework and Service Quality: Toward Theory in Services Marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 11: 25-39. Burnham, T. A., and Frels. J. K, and Mahajan. V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2): 109-26. Carman, J.M. (1990). Consumer perceptions of service quality: an assessment of the SERVQUAL dimensions. Journal of Retailing, 66: 33-55 Cerpoit, T., Rams. W. and Schindler. A. (2001). Customer retention. Loyalty and satisfaction in the German mobile cellular telecommunications market. Telecommunication Policy, 25(4): 249-269. Chaudhuri, A., and Holbrook. M. B. (2001). The chain effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: the role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(April): 31-93. Christensen, L. T., and Askegaard. S. (2001). Corporate identity and corporate image revisited - A semiotic perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4): 292-31. Churchill, G. A., and Suprenant. C. (1982). An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(November): 491-504. Clark, J. S., and Maher. J. K. (2006). If you have their minds, will their Bodies

26

follow? Factors effecting customer loyalty in a ski resort setting. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 13(1): 5971 Cody, K., and Hope. B. (1999). EX-SERVQUAL: an instrument to measure service quality of extranets, Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Wellington, 1-3 December. 207. Colgate, M., and Lang. B. (2001). Switching barriers in consumer markets: An investigation of the financial \services industry. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18 (4): 323 - 347. Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K. G., and Hult. T. M. (2000). Assessing the Effect5 of Quality. Value, and Customer Satisfaction on Consumer Behavioral Intentions in Service Environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2): 193-218. Cronin, J. J., and Taylor. S. A. (1992). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: reconciling performance based and perceptions minus-expectations measurement of service quality. J Mark 358: 125-3. Czepiel, J. A. (1990). Service Encounters and Service Relationships: Implications for Research. Journal of Business Research, 20 (January): 13-21 Day, G. (1969). A two-dimensional concept of brand loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research, 9 (3): 29-35. Dekimpe, M. G., Steenkamp. J. B. E. M, Mellens. M, and Abeele. P. V. (1997). Decline and variability in brand loyalty. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14: 405-20. DeWulf, K., and Odeberken-Schroder. G. (2003). Assesing the impact of a retailers relationship efforts on consumers attitudes and behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 10: 95-108. Dick, A. S., and Basu. K. (1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22: 99 113. Dick, A. S., and Kunal. Basu. (1994). Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2): 99-114 Doney, P.M., and Cannon, J.P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships, Journal of Marketing, 61(April): 35-51

27

Dwayne, B. (2003). The role of communication and trust in explaining customer loyalty an extension to the ECSI model. European Journal of Marketing, 38(9/10): 1272-1293. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H. and Oh, S. (1987). Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships, Journal of Marketing 20(2): 1127. Easton, A. (1966). Corporate Style versus Corporate Image. Journal of Marketing Research, 3(2): 168-175. Edgett, S. and Snow, K. (1997). Benchmarking measures of customer satisfaction, quality and performance for new financial service products. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(4): 250-259. Erdem, T., Louviere. J, and Swait. J. (2002). The impact of brand credibility on consumer price sensitivity. International Journal of Research in Marketing. 19: 1-19. Ettorre, B. (1996). The care and feeding of a corporate reputation. Management Review, 85(6):39-43. Finn. A, and Kayande, U. (1998). The Service Quality Measurement Literature: A Generalizability Perspective. In T. A. Swartz, D. E. Bowen, and S. W. Brown (Eds.), Advances in Services Marketing and Management, l: 97-130. Greenwich, CT: 3M Press Inc. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, 1. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Fisk, R. P., Brown, S. W., and Bitner, M. J. (1993). Tracking the Evolution of the Services Marketing Literature. Journal of Retailing, 69(1): 61-103. Folkes, V. S. (1988). Recent Attribution Research in Consumer behavior: A Review and New Directions. Journal of Consumer Research 14(March): 548-565. Fornell, C., and B. Wernefelt (1988). Model for Customer Complaint Management. Marketing Science, 7(Summer): 271-286. Fornell, C., and Werneldt. B. (1987). Defensive Marketing Strategy by Customer Complaint Management: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(November): 337-346. Fornell, Claes. (1992). A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience. Journal of Marketing, 56 (1): 6-21.

28

Fournier, S., and Yao. J. L. (1997). Reviving brand loyalty: a conceptualization within the framework of consumer-brand relationships. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 14(5): 451-72. Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58(April):1-19. Ganesh, J., Arnold. M. J, and Reynolds. K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: an examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64(July): 65-87 Gerpott, T.J., Rams, W. and Schindler, A. (2001). Customer retention, loyalty and satisfaction in the German mobile cellular telecommunications market. Telecommunications Policy, (25): 249-69. Goodwin, C., and Gremler, D.D. (1996). Friendship Over the Counter: How Social Aspects of the Service Encounters Influence Consumer Service Loyalty. Advances in Services Marketing and Management, 5: 247-282. Gremler, D. D., and Brown. S. W. (1996). Service loyalty. A global Perspective, International Service Quality Association, 171-180 Gremler, D. D. (1995). The effect of satisfaction, switching costs, and interpersonal bonds on service loyalty. Unpublished dissertation, Arizona State University. Grnroos, C. (1984). A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4): 36-44. Grnroos, C. (1988). Service Quality: The Six Criteria of Good Perceived service Quality. Review of Business, 9(Winter): 10-13. Gronroos, C. (1990). Service management and marketing. Massachusetts: Lexington Books. Guiltinan, J. P. (1989). A classification of switching costs with implications for relationship marketing. In Childers, T.L., Bagozzi, R.P. et al. (Eds), AMA Winter Educators Conference: Marketing Theory and Practice, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL: 216-20. Gummesson, E. and Grnroos. C (1988). Quality of Services: Lessons from the Product Sector. Add Value to Your Service. C. Suprenant. Chicago, American Marketing Association.

29

Gummesson, E. (1993). Quality Management in Service Organizations: An Interpretation of the Service Quality Phenomenon and a Synthesis of International Research, International Service Quality Association. Gundlach, G. T, and Murphy. P. E. (1993). Ethical and legal foundations of relational marketing exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 57(October): 35-46. Gursoy, D., Kim. K. and Uysal. M. (2004). Perceived impacts of festivals and special events by organizers: an extension and validation. Tourism Management, 25: 171-81. Gwiner, K. P., Gremler. D. D, and Bitner. M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in service industries: The customers perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26: 101114. Haemoon, Oh (1999). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: A holistic perspective Hospitality Management, 18: 67-82 Hanson, D. and Stuart, H. (2001). Failing the reputation management test: The case of BHP. The Big Australian Corporate Reputation Review, 4(2): 128-143. Heide, Jan. B. and Allen M. W. (1995). Vendor Consideration and Switching Behavior for Buyers in High-Technology Markets. Journa of Marketing, 59 (July): 30-43. Hennig-Thurau, T., and Klee, A. (1997). The Impact of Customer Satisfaction and Relationship Quality on Customer Retention: A Critical Reassessment and Model Development. Psychology and Marketing, 14(8): 737-764. Harris, F. and De Chernatony, L. (2001). Corporate branding and corporate brand performance. European Journal of Marketing, 35(3/4): 441-456 Heskett, J. L., Thomas. O., Jones, GaryW. Loveman, EarlW. Sasser, and Leonard A. Schlesinger. (1994). Putting the Service-Profit Chain to Work. Harvard Business Review, 72 (2): 164-174. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Huan, J., Bandyopadhyay D., Wang W., Snoeyink J., Prins J., Tropsha A. (2005). Comparing graph representations of protein structure for mining family-specific residue-based packing motifs. J. Comput. Biol., San Diego, CA 12: 657671.

30

Ilgen, D. R. (1971). Satisfaction with Performance as a Function of the Initial Level of Expectation and the Deviation from Expectation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6(January): 345-361. Jackson, B. B. (1985). Build customer relationships that last. Harvard Business Review, November/December: 120-128. Jacoby, J., and Kyner. D. B. (1973). Brand loyalty vs. repeat purchasing behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(February): 1-9. Jacoby, J. C., Robert. W, and William A. F. (1978). A Behavioral Process Approach to Information Acquisition in Nondurable Purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research, 15: 532-544 Johnson. M. D. and Fornell. C. (1991). A Framework for Comparing Customer Satisfaction Across Individuals and Product Categories. Journal of Economic Psychology 12: 267-286. Johnson, M.D., Gustafsson, A., Andreassen, T.W., Lervik, L. and Cha, J. (2001), The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models, Journal of Economic Pcychology, 22: 217-45. Jones, M. A., Mothersbaugh. D. L., and Betty, S. E. (2000). Switching barriers and repurchase intentions in services. Journal of Retailing, 76(2): 259 - 272 Jones. M. A, and Mothersbaugh D. L, and Betty. S. E. (2002). Why customers stay: Measuring the underlying dimensions of services switching costs and managing their differential strategic outcomes. Journal of Business Research, (55): 441-450. Juhl, H. J., Kristensen. K, and Ostergaard. P. (2002). Consumer satisfaction in European food retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9(6): 327-34. Jun, X., and Bin. L. (2005). An empirical study of customer loyalty of the telecommunication industry in China. ICEC05, August: 15-17 Kahneman, D., and Tversky. A. (1979). Prospect Theory. An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47: 263-291. Keller, K. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer Based Equity. Journal of Marketing, 1. Kim, M. K., Park. M. C., and Jeong. D. H. (2004). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile

31

telecommunication services. Telecommunications Policy, 28(1): 45-59. Klemperer, P. (1987). Markets with consumer switching costs. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 10(23): 76-94. Klemperer, P. (1995). Competition when consumers have switching costs: an overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics and international trade. Review of Economic Studies, 62(5): 15-39. EJM 39,7/8 924 Kotler, Philip. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall Inc. Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management. Analysis, planning, implementation and control (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Kristensen, K., Gronholdt L., and Martensen, A. (2000). Customer satisfaction Measurement at Post Denmark: results of application of the European Customer Satisfaction Index methodology. Total Quality Management, 11(7): 1007-15. lacobucci, D., Grayson. K. A., and Ostrom. A. L. (1994). The Calculus of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction. In T. A. Swartz, D. E. Bowen, and S. W. Brown (Eds.), Advances in Services Marketing and Management 3: 1-67. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc. lacobucci, D., and Ostrom. A. (1996a). Commercial and interpersonal relationships: using the structure of interpersonal relationships to understand individual-to-individual, individual-to- firm, and finn-to-firm relationships in commerce. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(1): 53-72. Lam, S. Y., and Shankar. V., and Erramilli. K. M., and Murthy. B. (2004). 32

Customer Value, Satisfaction, Loyalty, and Switching Costs: An Illustration from a Business-to-Business Service Context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32; 293 Lau, G., and Lee. S. (1999). Consumers trust in a brand and link to brand loyalty. Journal of Market Focused Management, 4: 341-70. Lee, I. Lee, J. Br Freick. T. (2001). The impact of switching costs on the customer satisfaction-loyalty link Mobile phone service in France. Journal of .Services Marketing, 15(1): 35-48 Lee, M., and Cunningham. L. F. (2001). A cost/benefit approach to understanding service loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(2): 113130. Lee, M., and Cunningham. L. F. (2001). A cost/benefit approach to understanding service loyalty. Journal of Services Marketing, 15(2): 113130. Liang, C. Kraemer KH, Morris A, Schiffmann R, Price VH, Menefee E et al. (2005) Characterization of tiger tail banding and hair shaft abnormalities in trichothiodystrophy. J Am Acad Dermatol, 52: 224232 Liljander, V., and Tore. S. (1993). Emotions in Service Satisfaction. International Journal of Service Industry Management. 8(2): 148-169 Liljander, V., Strandvik, T. (1993a), Estimating Zones of Tolerance in Perceived Service Quality, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 4(2): 6-28. Lipstein, B. (1959). The Dynamics of Brand Loyalty and Brand Switching. New York: Advertising Research Foundation, and Kuehn. A. A. (1962). Consumer Brand Choice as a Learning Process. Advertising Research, (2): 10-17 Lovelock, C. H. (1984). Positioning The Service Organization in the Marketplace. Services Marketing, C. H. Lovelock. New Yersey, Prentice-Hall: 133-139. Loveman, G. W. (1998). Employee Satisfaction, Customer Loyalty, and Financial Performance. Journal of Service Research, 1(1): 18-3 1 Luarn, P., and Lin. H. H. (2003). A Customer loyalty model for e-service context. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 4(4) MacInnis, D. J., and Price. L. L. (1987). The role of imagery in information processing: review and extensions. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4): 73-91. Magnus, S. (2005). Measuring customer loyalty with multi-item scales A case

33

for caution. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(1): 76-98 Mak, B. L., and Sockel. H. (2001). A confirmatory factor analysis of IS employee motivation and retention. Information and Management, 38: 265-76. Manish, M. (2001). Customer Loyalty Solutions, interactive. Viewed 2005-07-07. Access via Internet:http://www.brandchannel.com Markus, H. (1977). Self-Schemata and Processing Information About the Self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35: 63-78. Moan, K. K, and Myeong. C. P, and Dong. H. J. (2004). The effecfs customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korean mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunications Policy, 28:145159 Mohr, L. B. (1990). Understanding Significance Tests. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. Moon-koo, K., Myeong-Cheol. P., and Dong-Heon. J. (2004). The effects of customer satisfaction and switching barrier on customer loyalty in Korea mobile telecommunication services. Telecommunication Policy, 28: 145-159. Moorman, Christine. G. Z, and Rohit. D. (1992). Relationships Between Providers and Users of Marketing Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29 (August): 314-329 Morgan, R. M., and Hunt. S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(July): 20-38. Murray, K. B. (1991). A test of services marketing theory: Consumer information acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing, (55): 10-25. Narayandas, N. (1996). The link between customer satisfaction and customer loyalty: an empirical investigation. working paper, 97-017, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA. Nguyen, N. and Leblanc. G. (2001). Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8: 227-36. Nunnally, J. C. (1967). Psycometric Theory. New York, McGraw-Hill. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Odin, Y., Odin, N. and Florence, P.V. (2001). Conceptual and operational aspects of brand loyalty an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research,

34

53: 75-84. Oh, H. (1999). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: a holistic Perspective. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 18: 67-82. Oh, H. C. (1995). An empirical study of the relationship between restaurant image and customer loyalty. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. Oliver, R., and G. Linda (1981). Effects of Satisfaction and its Antecedents on Consumer Preferences and Intention. Advances in Consuer Research, 8: 88-93. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedence and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(September): 46-49. Oliver, R. L., and DeSarbo. W. S. (1988). Response Determinants in Satisfaction Judgement. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(March): 495-507. Oliver, R. L. 1980. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4): 462 Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty?. (Special Edition), Journal of Marketing, 63(5): 33-44. Palmer, A. (1998). Principles of service marketing, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. Parasuraman, A., Berry. L. L., and Zeithami. V. A. (1991). Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale. Journal of Retailing, 67(4): 420-450. Parasuraman, A., Zeithamal. V. A. and Berry. L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, (64): 12-40. Paolo, G., and Ottavia. P. (2004). The impact of interpersonal relationships on customer satisfaction and loyalty to the service provider. International Journal of Service Industry Management,15(4): 365-384 Perreault, W. D., and Russ. F. A. (1976). Physical Distribution Service in Industrial Purchase Decisions. Journal of Marketing, 40(April): 3-10. Pettijohn, L. S., Pettijohn. C. E., and Luke, R. H. (1997). An Evaluation of Fast Food Restaurant Satisfaction: Determinants, Competitive Comparisons and Impact on Future Patronage. Journal of Restaurant and Foodservice Marketing, 2(3): 3-20.

35

Pieters, R., and Bottschen, G. (1999). Special Issue on Service Marketing and Management: European Contributions. Journal of Business Research, 44(1): 1-4. Ringham, L. A., Johnson. L. W., and Morton. C. P. (1994). Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty For a Continuous Consumer Service. Australasian Journal of Market Research, 2(2): 43-48. .Reicheled, F., and Sasser. W. E. (1990). Zero Defections: Quality Comes to Services .Harvard Business Review, 68(September-October): 105-111 Reichheld, F. F. (1993). Loyalty-Based Management. Harvard Business .Review, 71 (2): 64-73 Reichheld, F. F. (1996). The loyalty effect. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Ross, S. (2002). Making the rewards fit the degree of customer loyalty. New Media Age, (1): 19. Rust, R. T., and Zahorik. A. J. (1993). Customer Satisfaction, Customer Retention, and Market Share. Journal of Retailing, 69(2): 193-215. Sekaran, U. (1992). Research Methods for Business. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Serkan, A., and Gokhan. O. (2004). The analysis of antecedents of customer loyalty in the Turkish mobile telecommunication market. European Journal of Marketing, 39(7/8): 910-925 Shankar, V., Amy. K. S, and Arvind. R. (2003). Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty in Online and Offline Environments. International Journal of Research in Marketing 20: 153-175 Sharma, N. and Patterson. P. G. (2000). Switching costs, alternative attractiveness and experience as moderators of relationship commitment in professional consumer services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 11(5): 470-90. Sharma, N., Patterson. P. G., Cicic. M., and Dawes. P. (1997). A contingency model of relationship commitment for professional consumer services. Proceedings of the 26th EMAC Conference, Warwick, May 20-23. Shy, O. (2002). A quick and easy method for estimating switching costs. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20: 71-87. Simon, J. L. (1974). Interpersonal Welfare Comparison Can Be Made and Used for

36

Redistribution Decisions. Kyklos, 27: 68-98. Sirdeshmukh, D., Jagdip. S., and Barry S. (2002). Consumer Trust, Value, and Loyalty in Relational Exchanges. Journal of Marketing, 66 (1): 15-37. Soderlund, M. (1998). Customer satisfaction and its consequences on customer behavior revisited. International Joumal of Services lndusbies Management, 9(2): 169-188. Storbacka, K., Strandvik. T., and Gronroos, C. (1994). Managing Customer Relationships for Profit: The Dynamics of Relationship Quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 5(5): 21-38. Strandvik, T. (1994). Tolerance Zones in Perceived Service Quality. Helsingfors, Finland: Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration. Swan, J. E. (1983). Consumer Satisfaction Research and Theory: Current Status and Future Directions. International Fare in Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Behavior. R. L. Day and H. K. Hunt. Bloomington, In, Division of Research, School of Business, University of Indinana, 124 -129. Taylor, S. (1994). Waiting for Service: The Relationship Between Delays and Evaluations of Service. Journal of Marketing, 58(April): 56-69. Tor, W. A., and Bodil. L. (1998). Customer loyalty and complex services the impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise Tor, W. A., and Bodil. L. (1997). Customer loyalty and complex services. The impact of corporate image on quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty for customers with varying degrees of service expertise. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 9(1): 7-23 Van Raaij, W. F. (1981). Economic Phsycology. Journal of Economic Phsycology, 1(1): 1-24. Vandamme, R., and Leunis. J. (1993). Development of a Multiple-item Scale for Measuring Hospital Service Quality. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 4(3): 30-49. Venetis, K. A., and Ghauri. P. N. (2000). The importance of service quality on customer retention: an empirical study of business service relationships. Proceedings of the Marketing in a Global Economy Conference, Buenos Aires. June 28-July 1: 215-224.

37

Weekes, D. J., Scott, M. E., & Tidwell, P. M. (1996). Measuring Quality and Client Satisfaction in Professional Business Services. Journal of Professional Services Marketing, 14(2): 25-.45. Weiner, B. (1980). A Cognitive (Attribution) - Emotion - Action Model of Motivated Behavior: An Analysis of Judgments of Help-Giving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(2): 186-200. Weiner, B. (1985). An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review, 92(October): 548-573. Weiner, B. (1985). Spontaneous` Causal Thinking. Psycological Bulletin 97(1): 74-84. Wetzels, M., and de Ruyter. K. (1997). On the perceived dynamics of retail service quality. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 4(2): 83-88. Woodruff, Robert B. (1997). Customer Value: The Next Source for Competitive Advantage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(2): 139-153. Yi, Y. (1990). A Critical Review of Consumer Satisfaction. Review of Marketing. V. A. Zeithaml. Chicago, American Marketing Association, 68-123. Yuille, J. C., and Catchpole. M. J. (1977). The role of imagery in models of cognition. Journal of Mental Imagery. 1: 171-80. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(July): 2-22. Zeithaml, V. A. L. L., Berry et al. (1988). Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality. Journal of Marketing (April). Zeithaml, V.A. (1988). Consumers perceptions of price, quality, and value: a meansend model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(July): 2-22. Antecedents of customer loyalty 925 Zeithaml, L., Berry. L., and Parasuraman. A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality, Journal of Marketing, 60 (4): 31-46. Zoe, S. D. (2005). Customer satisfaction, loyalty and commitment in service

38

organizations some evidence from Greece. Management Research News, 29(12): 782-800

39