Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 43 views

    More On Mind-Body..

    Uploaded by

    sam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
    The document proposes redefining the concept of the "soul" in a way that makes it testable from a scientific perspective. It suggests conceptualizing the soul as a 1) symbiotic parasite that feeds on nervous tissue and resides in various animals, 2) is largely electromagnetic and can be disturbed by electric/magnetic fields, 3) attaches to a particular body before birth and detaches at death, and 4) provides unique guidance to each individual body. This redefinition aims to reconcile religious and scientific worldviews by framing the soul in a way that allows it to be studied empirically.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    More On Mind-Body..

    Uploaded by

    sam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
    43 views2 pages
    The document proposes redefining the concept of the "soul" in a way that makes it testable from a scientific perspective. It suggests conceptualizing the soul as a 1) symbiotic parasite that feeds on nervous tissue and resides in various animals, 2) is largely electromagnetic and can be disturbed by electric/magnetic fields, 3) attaches to a particular body before birth and detaches at death, and 4) provides unique guidance to each individual body. This redefinition aims to reconcile religious and scientific worldviews by framing the soul in a way that allows it to be studied empirically.

    Original Description:

    a more precise (and testable!) definition of 'the soul'

    Original Title

    More on mind-body..

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document proposes redefining the concept of the "soul" in a way that makes it testable from a scientific perspective. It suggests conceptualizing the soul as a 1) symbiotic parasite that feeds on nervous tissue and resides in various animals, 2) is largely electromagnetic and can be disturbed by electric/magnetic fields, 3) attaches to a particular body before birth and detaches at death, and 4) provides unique guidance to each individual body. This redefinition aims to reconcile religious and scientific worldviews by framing the soul in a way that allows it to be studied empirically.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    43 views2 pages

    More On Mind-Body..

    Uploaded by

    sam iam / Salvatore Gerard Micheal
    The document proposes redefining the concept of the "soul" in a way that makes it testable from a scientific perspective. It suggests conceptualizing the soul as a 1) symbiotic parasite that feeds on nervous tissue and resides in various animals, 2) is largely electromagnetic and can be disturbed by electric/magnetic fields, 3) attaches to a particular body before birth and detaches at death, and 4) provides unique guidance to each individual body. This redefinition aims to reconcile religious and scientific worldviews by framing the soul in a way that allows it to be studied empirically.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    More on mind-body..

    As established in previous essays, the traditional statement about 'the soul' and the atheist stance are both useless. Science and human understanding cannot make progress without testable hypotheses. The soul is no exception. Borrowing terminology from biology and concepts from reincarnation, we can make some progress on this front in the very least about creating testable hypotheses. ^^ We cannot let religious types dictate to science 'what we can study and what we cannot' or 'what is science?' We cannot let this schism grow between religions and science the value systems and beliefs codified by each.. We must make objective steps to stop these camps further separating or asserting dominance over the other. We must find ways to reconcile moral frameworks from both perspectives acceptable to both sides (which are frequently bridged by single individuals). I cannot let the scientist in me dictate to 'the rest of me' how to behave.. At the same time, I cannot let my 'man of faith' within live in isolation with no connection to reality.. There must be a way to become unified/coherent. Personal meditation is a way to explore yourself and so I have encouraged that whenever I can.. TMers insist we're tapping into the 'coherent me' when we meditate 'properly' (according to their standards). ^^ Whatever meditation technique you use, chance are, you're minimizing internal noise while maximizing inner tranquility/peace. When we meditate properly, we minimize 'inner chatter' (the mind talking to itself) in the process 'forcing' the mind to relax and become more spontaneous. The mind stops its incessant chatter, the mind opens up, the mind explores itself,.. The mind explores the All.. In this sense, the mind is like a blooming flower and so the lotus blossom is frequently employed to represent enlightenment in various cultures.. ^^ But let's not get distracted by the symbols themselves.. They simply represent something special about meditation and meditative states: Awareness. Some people might mislabel that meta-awareness but I feel that's a mistake; Awareness is the archetype of awareness: the highest form of awareness of All. You cannot 'teach' that kind of awareness anymore than you can teach how to create Mozart music. ^ So.. We're back at square one? Not necessarily.. I suggest you meditate every chance you get to learn more about yourself and what makes you 'tick'.. ;) For example, I'm a very visual person. I teach with lots of visual aids and depend on visualization skills a tremendous amount.. ^^ I cannot overstress how visual I am in my consciousness, modes of thought, and ways of learning myself.. ^^ I'm sure you're very different.. Maybe you're more verbal and less intuitive than me.. ^^ Try this assessment to see what your learning styles are.. Please post the general results in a comment below and how those learning styles affect your ability to meditate and achieve Awareness .. If you have time, please also comment about any epiphanies you might have reached during/after meditation.. (Sorry for all the 'homework'.. ^^ I'm trying to get these articles more helpful/interactive.) 'Back' to becoming more integral/unified/coherent.. (As if the last two paragraphs had 'nothing' to do with that.. ;) The scientist in me cannot dictate to the rest of me anything much less my total morality system. At the same time, my spiritual side must be connected to reality (not off in some delusional playground). ^^ My spiritual side must be grounded in reality (not some self-reinforcing delusion). My scientific side cannot 'take over'. The 'compromise' that promises any possibility of growth is: testing the existence of 'the soul'. Now because we know almost nothing about what 'the soul' is, we must be a 'little' more clever in devising a testable hypothesis. Let's redefine what 'the soul' is (to make it more testable): 1. a symbiotic 'parasite' feeding off nervous tissue impulses residing in various animals/hosts: humans, whales, dolphins, elephants,.. (and possibly in the near future - robots) 2. largely electromagnetic and therefore is 'disturbable' by strong electric/magnetic fields

    3. attaches to a particular body sometime before birth and detaches at/after death of the body 4. is unique and provides unique guidance to a particular body In this view, the body is/provides: 1. a support / attachment point for souls 2. a way for souls to 'articulate' spiritual ideas in the physical plane 3. an illusion of 'reproduction' in the physical plane 4. a 'theatre' of interaction for souls 5. suitable illusion for Awareness to occur You might be curious how I 'came up' with these ideas.. ^^ Over many years and getting exposed to many sci-fis such as: Ghost in the Shell, Stargate, The Invisibles (Outer Limits), Riverworld, and various Star Treks dealing with mind-dominating aliens. I've studied symbiosis and parasitism from a systems perspective. I've studied religions and belief systems from the same.. Over the years, I realized my scientific beliefs and spiritual beliefs need not be so disjoint. I kept reducing my 'spiritual belief system' to 'bare essentials'.. ^^ All with the idea to maintain integrity = who I am .. For the longest time, as stated in a previous essay, I refused to 'go along with' the idea of 'a soul'. Poppycock. Selfreinforcing delusion. Pure BS. But.. My super-simplified spiritual belief system still did not make any scientific assertions.. To assert the existence of God is untenable. To assert the existence of 'the soul', as defined by tradition, is also untenable.. We must redefine 'soul' to make the concept more testable.. But we cannot be 'weak' about it; we must be strong in our statements! We must take a stand! We may be wrong but we cannot make ANY progress without this crucial step! We cannot simply ask the question: is there a soul? Because we don't know what a soul is! ..The ONLY way to make progress is to propose what you think a soul exactly is and try to disprove/test that idea.. ..To explain some of the finer points, we suppose we're here for a reason it's not just all random bullshit.. ^^ The 'only' general reason I can see why all of us would come to such a silly accursed place is.. ^^ Not 'education' that's too general.. Not to union with God that's too specific and sounds (honestly) too sanctimonious to be real.. ^^ The most general reason I can give for all of us coming to such a silly planet like Earth is.. Awareness. Awareness like awareness seems to require something (or sets of things and events) like a veil (a bride/bridegroom veil?) which functions as a distraction/illusion from Reality (Truth). In this sense, We are The Christ who lifts off the veil of our Bride (nature) to See Her true Beauty (her true nature). Another analogy is portrayed in Dark City where our hero realizes he's like the Kwisatz Haderach from Dune or Neo from Matrix or.. ^^ Do we all have this capability as some modern physicists would have us believe? ^^ Personally, I think we take the analogy too far.. We may have ability to become Aware like God but.. To have the creative power of God is something else, isn't it? ^^ Then again, maybe we're more like Eddorians who crave raw power of domination more than anything else! :( (I hope/pray not..) ^^ [sigh] .. Whether you lean toward Eddorian or Arisian.. Fervent religious or atheist.. Spiritual or non.. Let's lift the veil and see what's under that.. Let's ask testable questions; let's make testable statements; let's do it about things that matter.

    You might also like