VW Ratios Analysed
VW Ratios Analysed
VW Ratios Analysed
Team 6 Eric (IM12B004) Nanako (IM12B012) Rachel (IM12Y009) Reza (IM12O007) Cheenu (IM12Y005)
1
Analysis of Ratios:
Analysis of Ratios
Key differences among ratios : Profitability Ratios (Gross, Operating and Profit margins)
Profitability Ratios
Volkswagen AG Gross Margin 17.6% Toyota Motor Corp.
VS.
VWs strategy to offer vehicles at various price points including a wide range of luxury brands which carry huge margins. Toyotas strategy to offer high quality vehicles at affordable prices and their dominating presence is restricted to the Asian and the US markets. ~36% of VWs sales represents sales from luxury cars which explains reasons for high margins compared to Toyota Due to the earthquake in 2011, Toyota suffered operating margin erosion and ended up with -0.10% margin on their automotive business, however was offset by the profits made from their financing business amounting to 35%. On the other hand VW showed record results for 2011 and overtook Toyota as the Number 1 brand in the world. VWs profit margins also boosted by its investments in various automobile entities. They recognised profits of ~2.1b Euros as share of equity profits in 2011.
3
VS.
We have combined the solvency ratios and the rate of return ratios to address the equity base of both companies in one place along with their debts. VW has an equity base of US$74.8b as against Toyotas equity base of US$132b. The debt balance for VW is US$122b as against Toyotas debt balance of US$150b The strategy for VW is to rely a lot on the debt markets to provide necessary capital to make key acquisitions for brand diversification and fund product development. This is further emphasized by the affect the turbulent Euro economy plays in raising funds through equity. On the other hand, Toyota relies on stability and expanded its equity base in the earlier years by offering more shares to the public. Toyota has paid up capital of ~US$11.8b which is ~7.6 times more than the paid up capital of VW which has a paid up capital of ~US$1.5. Toyotas strategy is also to maintain low debt levels and keep unusually large amounts of 4 cash on hand as key philosophy since 1950s.
VS.
Inventory days 37
Payable days 45
Cash Cycle days 133
Analysis of Cash Conversion Cycle
Payable days 52
Cash Cycle days 106
VW sells a lot of luxury brands which has an effect of increasing production cycle time, and thus inventory levels. Also, acquiring diverse brands make it more difficult to manage levels across a wider range of inventory. Hence their inventory days are significantly higher than Toyota who are on other end, and practice their world-famous Just-in-Time production system. Receivable days are similar which reflects the overall pattern in the automobile industry of selling vehicles on finance. Toyota payable days are better due to better negotiation with suppliers. They have designated suppliers who understand TPS well and have worked with Toyota for many years. VW on the other hand have marginal lower payable days due to acquiring different brands who do not necessarily have the same suppliers as VW. Hence, Toyota have a shorter cash cycle primarily due to their strategic dedication to minimise inventories.
5