Esp Principle and Design
Esp Principle and Design
Esp Principle and Design
Electrostatic Precipitator
GENERAL
VISIBILITY REDUCTION DUE TO SCATTERING OF LIGHT FROM SURFACES OF AIR BORNE PARTICLES MATERIAL DAMAGE
DISORDER DUE TO PHYSICAL AGENTS - ENVIRONMENTAL HEAT OR LOW TEMPERATURE EYE IRRITATION, COUGH AND BREATHLESSNESS FORMATION OF CARBOXYL HEMOGLOBIN WHICH PREVENTS O2 CARRIAGE BY BLOOD
Rapid economic growth Rapid industrialization and urbanization Increased industrial production Population explosion Growth in demand for power Increase in requirement for thermal power plants More number of old coal based power plants designed for high emission & low ash content coal High ash content or deterioration in quality of coal reserve
Sl. NO.
Remarks
1.
30 to 40
Less efficiency, more space required and not suitable for power plant Not for power plant Were widely used in power plants but can not satisfy the present day pollution control requirement
2.
30 40 75 to 80
3.
Scrubbers(wet)
50 to 60
80 to 90
4.
15-25
99.99
125 to 150
99.99
Used mainly in process industries and can not satisfy the pollution control requirement Can meet any efficiency and mostly used in all power plants. Can meet any efficiency and used many power plants abroad. Gaining momentum in Indian Power plants also.
Removal of abrasive material in the dust to reduce wear and tear of the Fan components Removal of objectionable matter in the dust
NO2 and SO2
Very high collection efficiency Low pressure drop capacity to collect sub-micron particles Robust construction - Longer life Less maintenance Adaptability
The precipitation process involves 4 main functions Corona generation Particle charging Particle collection Removal of particles
Due to the ionisation of gas molecules, + ve ions, -ve ions and free electrons are generated.
The -ve charges of ions and free electrons travel towards +ve electrode and the +ve charges of ions travel towards -ve electrodes. When -ve ions travel towards +ve electrodes, the -ve charges get attached to the dust particles and thus the dust particles are electrically charged,
Migration Velocity
The velocity which the dust particle travel towards the collecting electrode under the influence of electric field.
DEFINITIONS
Flue gas flow in m3 ESP effective cross section m2 Effective length of ESP Collecting electrode height Effective length of ESP in m Flue gas velocity in m/s
Aspect ratio
DEFINITIONS
Gas velocity velocity is decided by the gas flow and collection efficiency required Higher the gas velocity, higher the carryover of dust particles without collection - Re-entertainment Very poor velocity alters the flow distribution and effects settling of dust particles optimum velocity depends upon the application will improve the performance.
Aspect ratio During the rapping, the falling of dust particle take a trajectory form Lower the aspect ratio, the trajectory dust travel along with gas flow without falling in to hoppers - Leads to re-entrainment loss. Higher the ratio, performance will be good optimum aspect ratio depends on allowable velocity, required collection efficiency and available space.
Treatment time Time available for capturing the dust particle more treatment time at reasonable velocity improves the collection efficiency Probability of capturing the re-entrained partilces improves with time.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS IN INDIA Prior to 1984 1974 water act 1977 water cess act 1981 air act The cost of compliance was more than that of non-compliance: 1986 Environmental Protection Act comprehensive act with command & control
SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER (SPM) STANDARD ALSO STATES THAT FOR POWER PLANTS CAPACITY LESS THAN 62.5 MW AND COMMISSIONED BEFORE 01 01 1982 FOR CEMENT PLANTS (TOTAL EMISSIONS) CAPACITY LESS THAN 200 TPD CAPACITY MORE THAN 200 TPD
: 350 mg/Nm3
World Banks proposed guide lines For new thermal power plants (TPP) for capacities 50 MW Pollution control at project formulation level itself Site specific emission guide line Propose standard of 50 mg/Nm3 Aided projects are to abide by this Further implication on technical, economic & institutional
Emission of various pollutants under the business-as-usual scenario Projection YEAR CO2 1996 2001 2006 2011 428.0 511.0 605.5 736.2 POLLUTANTS (MT) CO 16.162 17.9 19.6 22.0 SPM 0.30 259.1 338.0 434.0 NOX 1.34 1.75 2.19 2.82 SOX 0.049 0.089 0.125 0.158
ppm 28 39 39 194 43
EFFICIENCY REQUIREMENT - %
100
99.75 99.5
100 g/Nm3
8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 90
91
92
93 94 95 96 97 98 COLLECTION EFFICIENCY - %
99
100
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR