Capital Structure
Capital Structure
Capital Structure
expansion
Replacement
Modernization
Existing cap
structure
Payout
Policy
Desired
Debt-Equity mix
Cont.
Effect on
RISK
Effect
On Return
Effect on
Cost OF Capital
Optimum
Capital structure
Value of
Firm
Components of Capital
Debt
Debentures
Term Loans
Equity
Equity shares
Preference Shares
Retained Earnings
Capital Structure
The capital structure of a company
refers to the mix of the long-term
finances used in the organization.
As the proportion of Debt increases in
the capital structure of an
organization , the risk of shareholders
increases.
Capital structure
Mix of long-term finance used by the firm.
Authorized Capital of Rs. 10 each
Issued, subscribed and paid up
capital
Present issue
Equity at par
16% secured loan
Term loan from bank
Buyers credit
90,00,00,000
8,25,00,000
19,34,00,000
56,50,00,000
50,60,00,000
13,50,00,000
1,48,20,00,000
Cost of capital
Cash flow projections of the company
Size of the company
Dilution of control
Floatation costs
Profitability
Flexibility
Control
solvency
Kd=F/B
Ke=E/S
Ko=[Kd*B/(B+S)]+
[Ke*S/(B+S)] or O/V
V=B+S
B= (1+Kd)t
E
S=
(1+Ke)t
NI Approach
While increasing the leverage in the firm,
the Cost of Capital (Ko) of the firm is decrease.
Means the inverse relationship between Ko and
leverage
Mr. Devid Durrande invented this approach
Assumptions
No tax
Sources of finance equity and debt
No changes in risk of investors
Retained earning is reinvesting in the firm
100% dividend pay-out ratio
No changes in assets
Net operating income is not expected to
grow or decline over time
Business risk remain same
ke
C
O
S
t
ko
Kd
Proportion of Debt
NOI Approach
While increasing or decrease in the leverage of
the firm,
Ko remain constant.
Means the undefined relationship between Ko
and leverage
Mr. Devid Durrande invented this approach
Changes in leverage = No
changes in Ko
increase in leverage = Ko
remain same and increase Ke
Decrease in leverage = Ko
remain same and decrease Ke
Ke
C
O
S
T
%
Ko
Kd
leverage
Traditional approach
When leverage increase, then at the
certain level Ko decrease. After that,
leverage increase continuously the K o
increase.
Means the us relationship between K o
and leverage is inverse at certain level
then after co-relationship.
Ezra Solomon invented this approach
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
Traditional Approach
At 1 stage company
trading on equity
Ke
C
O
S
T
%
Ko
leverage
Kd
At 2 stage no gai
Leverage. Optim
cap. st
ke
ko
Kd
C
O
S
t
Proportion of Debt
particular
NOI
-Interest
NI
Ke
Equity
capitalization
+debenture
Value of the firm
2,00,000
0
2,00,000
15%
13,33,333
2,00,000
40,000
1,60,000
16%
10,00,000
2,00,000
72,000
1,28,000
18%
7,11,111
Ko=NOI/V
15%
0
4,00,000 6,00,000
13,33,333 14,00,000 13,11,111
14.29%
15.25%
MM APPROACH
According to this theory , if we increase
or decrease debt in the mix of capital
structure,
- the cost of equity and cost of debt
remain same
- Overall cost of capital will remain
same
- So Value of the firm remain same
In support of it they gave arbitrage
process
M.M Approach
Relationship between Ko and
leverage is undefined.
Its just equal to NOI approach but
presentation is quiet different.
M M theory is centered on behavior
of investor.
Assumption
No tax
Loan on securities is available
Same business risk
100%dividend pay-out.
No transferring cost of securities
Competent capital market
Assumptions of MM
Proposal of M M theory
1.
1.
2.
Arbitrage process
Purchase security at low price and s
high price and gain profit.
This price difference call arbitrage.
Arbitrage Process
According to MM , if value of the leveraged
firm increases , the investors of leveraged
firm sells his investment in the firm and
create home leverage in the same proportion
In this way he can earn same money with
lesser Investment
And the value of the leveraged firm comes
down and become equal to unleveraged firm
So capital structure is irrelevant in deciding
the value of the firm
ARBITRAGE PROCESS
Suppose there are two firm A and B having
following capital structure having equal
income of 2,00,000 each
Firm A
Equity- 16,00,000
Firm B
Equity- 10,00,000
Debt (10%)6,00,000
Firm A
Income
Less Interest
2,00,000
NIL
------Earning Available to
shareholder
2,00,000
Ke
12.5%
Firm B
Income
Less Interest
Earning Available to
shareholder
Ke
2,00,000
1,00,000
---------------1,00,000
16%
FIRM A
Value of Debt
Value of Equity
--------------------Value of the firm
FIRM B
Value of Debt
Value of Equity
--------------------Value of the firm
NIL
16,00,000
16,00,000
10,00,000
6,25,000
16,25,000
Ke2
C
O
S
T
%
Ke
Ke1
Ko
Kd
leverage
particular
NOI
-Interest
NI
Ke
Equity capitalization
+debenture
Value of the firm
Ko=NOI/V
3,00,000
0
3,00,000
13%
23,07,692
0
23,07,692
13%
3,00,000
1,20,000
1,80,000
15%
12,00,000
12,00,000
24,00,000
12.5%
A company B company
23,07,692 24,00,000
13%
12.5%