Pakistan's Foreign Policy
Pakistan's Foreign Policy
Pakistan's Foreign Policy
PAKISTAN
Peaceful Coexistence
Non-alignment
United Nations Charter
Unity of Islamic World
International and regional Cooperation
Economic Development
Ideology
Intoduction
GUIDING PRINCPLES OF
PAKISTAN'S FoREIGN POLICY
Protection of freedom and sovereignty
.Cordial Relations with Muslim Countries
Non Interference in Internal Affairs of Other countries
.NON-ALIGNMENT
Geographical Importance
1948-1990
Fall of USSR
1991-2014
Pakistan play a role for Russia in its quest for establishing good
relations with the Muslim states of Middle East and the South East
Asia.
Russia also srokes the right chord when their foreign minister on
28th November 2011,said that hunting terrorists cannot be a
pretext for violating the soverignty of a country.
Russia is being considered as a resurgent ecnomic and military
power which believes in multi-polarity it simply wants to forestall
American hegemony in this region.
Recommendations
Pakistan should diversify its foreign policy by seriously
considering the Russia option,in the wake of the US withdrwal from
Afghanistan and the consequent scaling back of US influence from
the region.
Pakistan should evolve a strategic consensus with Russia on the
issue of counter terrorism,nuclear non-poliferation,Afghanistan
and peace stability in South Asia.
Pakistan must expand ecnomic relations with Russia in the domain
of energy and increase its trade in keeping with the geo-ecnomic
trends of world plitics.
US withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2014 will heighten Russias
concern regarding the stability of Central Asian borders and
Pakistan should seize upon this opportunity to build a
rapprochement with Russia.
Pakistan-India
The most problematic area of Pakistans foreign policy is the relationship with
India. The relations have been strained since independence in 1947. There
were periods of normal foreign relations but generally it remained troubled
marked with distrust and conflict changes of tough statements have been the
features.
This bitterness caused three major wars in 1947-48, 1965 and 1971.The
document is an attempt to see Pakistans external relations with its immediate
eastern neighbor India, in a contemporary light.
The strategies recommended in this policy come from the belief that
Pakistans stable internal security and Pakistans elevated presence in the
global economy are principal dictators of its Foreign Policy.
An aggressive, liberal and a pro-active foreign policy makes way for improved
ties with the nations of the world.With Pakistan and Indias relation being
strengthened via the tools of negotiations and diplomacy, it can be expected
that inter-regional cooperation will be catalyzed.
Thus, better ties between the two most significant neighbors in the region,
Pakistan and India, symbolize enhanced cooperation in the South Asian region
on the whole.The document sets out a two-faceted goal, Short-Term and LongTerm and bridges the proposed solutions to the principal issues between
Pakistan and India.
1) ECONOMIC RELATIONS:
Indias advancing economy has turned it into the 2nd economic giant
(after China) in the South Asian region; Pakistans economic growth
on the contrary, is becoming increasingly stagnant. Pakistan, clearly,
does not enjoy an alternative and it must move forward vigorously to
secure economic collaborations with India. It must be realized that
trade is the most significant factor which governs the relations
between any two countries.
Current Scenario:
(c) Agriculture and Textile products which are exported from Pakistan
to India are subject to Composite Tariff. This means that Pakistans
products are charged with a special fee, besides the regular advalorem tax.
(d) Pakistan itself does not have a standardized import regime. Indian
exporters, therefore, have to deal with fewer restrictions of product
quality and specifications.
Proposed Soluttion:
(a) Pakistan should upgrade its manufacturing industry and improve the
value-addition processes of exportable items. Better-Quality products
are more likely to have greater access to the Indian markets
(C) State Bank of Pakistan and Reserve Bank of India should open crossborder branches on the basis of mutual benefits.
(d) The Economic Zone between Kasur (Pakistan) and Amritsar (India)
should be established.
Out of all other bilateral disputes between Pakistan and India, the Sir
Creek Dispute can be expected to have a relatively quick solution. The
settlement of this dispute can be used as an important ConfidenceBuilding Measure to build on to resolve other pending disputes. Sir Creek
is a 96 km strip of water. It is made up of marshes which makes it waterlogged for most of the year. It runs in the Rann of Kutch area. The Rann
of Kutch area lies between the south of Sindh in Pakistan and the State
of Gujrat in India.When the prospect of important mineral resources
(oil/gas) was discovered in the sub-surface of Sir Creek, Pakistan and
India became more serious about their respective claims. Both countries
now realize that if they loose one kilometer of Sir Creek on ground, it
would subsequently mean a loss of hundreds of square nautical miles of
the resourceful economic zone under-water. Indias current stance is that
boundaries should first be marked under-water and according to the
under-water boundaries, the land boundaries shall be demarcated.
Whereas Pakistans current stance is to first demarcate on the ground
and then under-water. Pakistan wants the adoption of the 1914 Bombay
Resolution.
(a) The demarcation of land boundaries shall be done first.The demarcation of the
under-water maritime boundaries will then follow.
(c) 2 factors will further strengthen Pakistans case. First, Sir Creek was a major
water distributory of River Indus. Second, the tail of Sir Creek terminates in Badin
which is a district in Pakistan.
(d) Pakistans claims are very strong and it is very likely that the CLCS will
eventually favor Pakistan.
(3) PRISONERS
The settlement of Sir Creek Dispute can be followed with another important
Confidence-Building Measure. The area of Sir Creek is concentrated with
fishermen. Since territorial borders in water (and on land) are not properly
marked, fishermen from both sides end up mistakenly trespassing into each
others territorial waters. They are then arrested.
The laws which are used by Pakistan and India to govern their seas and arrest
these fishermen have not been conformed by UNCLOS. Pakistanifishermen are
arrested by India under the Maritime Zones of India Acts, 1976and 1981. India is
a signatory of the UNCLOS but its maritime zone acts do not conform to the
United Nations Convention on Law of the Seas (UNCLOS).
Proposed Solutions:
The Pakistan Maritime Security Agency (PMSA) and the Indian Coast
Guard (ICG) shall resume the negotiations which were called off after
the Mumbai attacks. These negotiations will ensure:
(a) That whenever Pakistani fishermen are detained in India, the Indian
maritime agencies will immediately inform the Pakistani maritime
agencies and vice versa.
(b) That the ships and boats of the detained Pakistani fishermen will be
handed over to the Pakistani maritime agency by the Indian maritime
agencies and vice versa.
The Issue:
(a) 1960s Indus Water Treaty gave 3 western rivers to Pakistan. India was
allowed to use some water from these 3 rivers before they enter into Pakistan.
(b) India was permitted to use the water for hydropower generation.
The condition was that Indian usage must not alter the natural timing of flow
and the quantity of these waters as they enter Pakistan.
(c) The problem will get more severe when India will complete the construction
of Bursar Dam, Kishanganga Dam, Pakuldul Dam, Sawalkot Dam, Dal Huste
Dam.
rivers Jehlum and Chenab. If the two countries can keep ego aside, there can
be numerous ways in which the 1960 Treaty can be implemented to benefit
both sides. In fact, India has the potential to increase this flow during difficult
planting seasons in Pakistan. To avoid this situation; this can only be made
possible when relations between both countries are friendlier
(4) KASHMIR:
JKLF (Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front) Chairman Yasin Malik believes that the
option of a deep freeze (that is, to freeze the matter in its current position for a
few years before relations become stronger between Pakistan and India) is not
feasible, without stopping the Indian operation in the Indian-occupied Kashmir.
India can not afford to deep-freeze the matter because of the suspicion that
the freedom
Indias Stance:
(a) Propagate that unrest in Kashmir is basically Pakistans Proxy War and
Pakistan is
(b) Make the Line of Control (LOC) the international border between Pakistan
and India.
Proposed-Solution Plebiscite:
(a) Pakistan believes that the main issue is not the territorial control of the
land of Kashmir but the right of self-determination of the Kashmiri people.
Pakistan should continue to advocate this stance.
(b) Pakistan should use the global forums to remind its international partners
that Indian forces deployed in Kashmir, are violating the very basic human
rights by engaging in acts of rape and child molestation.
PA K I S TA N - U S A
INTRODUCTION
H ISTORY
1947-1971
S E AT O
South East Asian Treaty
Organization
September 8, 1954
Ayubs Era(1952-1969)
Beginning of a cosy relationship with the US...
1953- Food Crisis Aid
1954-Mutual Defence Assistance Agreement
CENTO
Central Treaty
Organization
1955
Ayubs Era(1952-1969)
Pakistan as a strategic partner in completing
the ring of containment around Soviet Union.
Significance of SEATO and CENTO
Military aid increased to $500 million by
1957
Further strengthening of US-Pak
relationship
Became United States' "most-allied ally" in
Asia.
Ayubs Era(1952-1969)
U2 Crisis of 1960
April 9, 1960 - U-2 spy plane of the special CIA unit crossed
the national boundary of the Soviet Union and flew over four
Soviet top secret military objects but was detected by the
Soviet Air Defence Forces .
Ayubs Era(1952-1969)
U2 Crisis of 1960
Pakistan became a wholehearted ally which undertook real
responsibilities and risks by providing facilities highly important
to US national security.
Compromise on Pakistan's security and worsened relations with
the Soviet Union
Soviet Union threatened the nuclear annihilation of Pakistani
cities.
Ayubs Era(1952-1969)
In 1962 president ayub khan visit to china
& soviet union, the America did not like
these overtures.
The relations between the two countries
were bitterly strained when India
attacked Pakistan in 1965 and USA
stopped all its military aid to Pakistan,
despite the fact that Pakistan was its ally
being member of CENTO / SEATO.
Z u l fi q a r B h u t t o s E r a
1971-1977
Bhuttos Presidency
(1971-1973)
G E N E R A L Z I A S E R A
1980-1988
Sharing of Intelligence
Networks
Pakistan'sISIandSpecial Service
Groupcooperated with the CIA and
theUnited States Army Special Forcesto
support the armed struggle against Soviets.
Unstable
Democratic
Governments
1988-1999
Pakistan-U.S Relations
Post 9/11
Left to Right:President Bush in Pakistan March 2006 with the then President
Musharraf and Prime Minister Aziz, Bush
learning cricket in Pakistan
Present Relations
Obama elected in Nov 2008.
A stable, democratic, prosperous Pakistan is
considered vital to U.S. interests.
The Obama Administration states an
intention to continue pursuing close and
mutually beneficial relations with
Islamabad.
CONTORS OF
PAKISTAN AND CHINA
FOREIN POLICY
Contents
Introduction
Background
Conclusion
Introduction
No country today can think of a life independent of other
nations. Every country has to develop relations with other
countries so as to meet its requirements in economical, industrial
and technological fields. It is thus necessary for every country to
formulate a sound foreign policy.
Pakistan is an important third world country, in its
developmental stage. It also has formulated her foreign policy
keeping in mind its geography, politic Relations between sovereign
states. It is a reflection of domestic politics and an interaction
among sovereign states. It indicates the principles and references
on which a country wants to establish relations with another
country.
Karakoram Highway
Gwadar Port.
JF-17 Thunder
Conclusion
Pakistan has collaborated with China in extensive
military and economic projects, seeing China as a
counterweight to India and the United State.
Pakistan has also served as a conduit for China's
influence in the Muslim world.
China also has a consistent record of supporting
Pakistan in regional issues. Pakistan's military
depends heavily on Chinese armaments, and joint
projects of both economic and militaristic
importance are ongoing. China has supplied
equipment to support Pakistan's nuclear program.
GEOGRAPHIC IMPORTANCE
Tajikistan is nearly 16 km away from
Pakistan.
Kazakhstan Sandwiched at the crossroads
of Asia and Europe.
Kyrgyzstan is west of the People's Republic
of China.
Uzbekistan is located north of
Turkmenistan and Afghanistan.
Turkmenistan, bordering the Caspian Sea
to the west, Iran and Afghanistan to the
south,
Uzbekistan to the north-east, and
Kazakhstan to the north-west.
GEOGRAPHIC IMPORTANCE
Measures
Measures
Gwadar Port- An Asset for Pakistan and the Central Asian States.
Business Encouragement.
CONCLUSIONS
Disillusionment has a large part of the common
history between Pakistan and Russia. However,
in order to move forward the past needs to be
left behind and unnecessary myths surrounding
the relationship need to be debunked, in order
to develop a careful, long-term and proactive
foreign policy and relationship.
National interest-based convergences need to
be highlighted, and a better understanding of
the nature of Pakistan-Russian relations can
facilitate that.
CONCLUSIONS
Historically speaking, Pakistans relations with
the United States have gone through several
phases of close cooperation and estrangement.
The strength of this relationship obviously will
depend on the convergence of the national
interests of the two countries, the greater the
convergence, the stronger with this relationship
be.
Let us see what the US global and regional
interests in South Asia are and the extent to
which they converge with Pakistans national
interests.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Pakistan is the only country which gives a
sea route to the CARs throughout the
year. Thus, no one can deny the geostrategic importance of Pakistan.
Therefore, Pakistan and the member
states can also enhance the bilateral trade
between them. Pakistan's geo-strategic
location, Islamic ideology, and common
interests are the manifestation of their
future consideration for CARs.