Session 1 Forecasting: Advanced Management Accounting
Session 1 Forecasting: Advanced Management Accounting
Session 1 Forecasting: Advanced Management Accounting
Session 1
Forecasting
10/04/2018 1
Forecasting
2
Forecasting
3
Forecasting - High/low Method
This involves selecting the past cost periods with the highest and
lowest activity levels. Past total costs are separated into fixed
and variable elements in the form of an equation
y = a + bx
y = a + bx
2 2
x y y xy xy x² x y² y
60 1,700 102,000 3,600 2,890,000
90 2,300 207,000 8,100 5,290,000
75 1,960 147,000 5,625 3,841,600
80 2,050 164,000 6,400 4,202,500
85 2,180 185,300 7,225 4,752,400
65 1,810 117,650 4,225 3,276,100
∑ x=455 ∑ y=12,000 ∑ xy=922,950 ∑ x² =35,175 ∑ y²=24,252,600
The least squares method
b= n∑xy - ∑x∑y a= ∑y - b ∑x
n∑x2 – (∑x)2 n n
= (12,000/6) - (19.3043 x 455/6)
= (6 x 922,950) - (455 x 12,000) = (12,000 / 6) - (19.3043 x 455 / 6) =
(6 x 35,175) - 4552 2,000 - 1463.9094
= 5,537,700 - 5460 000 = 536.09
(211,050 - 207,025)
= 77,000 Fixed costs are £536.09
4,025
= 19.3043
2500
2000
1500
1000
Fuel Cost
500 Linear (Fuel Cost)
0
Production hours 60 65 75 80 85 90
The Correlation Coefficient
( termed ‘r’)
Tests if two sets of data appear to have a relationship and
indicates the extent of this.
r= 5,537,700 – 5,460,000
SQRT([211,050 – 207,025] [145,515,600 – 144,000,000])
r= 77,700 = + 0.9948229
78,104.35
Coefficient of Determination (r2)
Tests how much of the variation in the ‘y’ values can be explained by changes
in the ‘x’ values.
In this example - how much of the variation in cost can be explained by the
variations in activity level, expressed in hours.
r² = 0.9849672
This means that 98.49672% of the change in fuel costs is explained by the
change in production hours.
Limitations
The above assumes that the past can be used to predict the future
which may not be the case. Also we are assuming that cost is
determined by only one variable. There may be many variables
affecting cost, in which case multiple regression (which is not covered
on this course)would be more appropriate.
Time Series Analysis
30
25
Sales Leads
20
15 Sales Leads
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Quarter
We can apply the formulae to determine the regression equation
i.e.:
y = a + bx
where y = sales leads, x = month number, a= starting value and b = variable element.
a = ∑y - b ∑x
n n
where n = the number of observations made and:
b = n∑xy - ∑x∑y
n∑x² -(∑x)²
• You can use an EXCEL spreadsheet rather than
calculating the line of best fit manually.
• Applying the LINEST and INTERCEPT statistical
functions to the data, gives the answer:
Y = 14.3 + 0.825x
40