Do Family Medicine NBME Shelf Scores Improve... STFM Annaheim 12 23 2017

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Do Family Medicine NBME Shelf

Scores Improve when Students are


Allowed to Repeat the NBME Exam
at the End of the Academic Year?
Suzanne Minor, MD, FAAFP
Sarah Stumbar, MD, MPH
Rodolfo Bonnin, PhD
Marquita Samuels, MBA Candidate
History of the FM Clerkship
Class of Academic Year # of Students Structure Shelf
2013 2011 – 2012 43 Longitudinal, Year-long End of Year
2014 2012 – 2013 43 Block, 6 week End of Block
2015 2013 – 2014 80 Block, 4 week End of Block, End of Year
2016 2014 – 2015 120 Block, 8 week End of Block, End of Year
2017 2015 – 2016 120 Block, 8 week End of Block
2018 2016 – 2017 120 Block, 8 week End of Block
Anecdotally…
Students seemed to do better when they took the
shelf at the end of the year than at the end of blocks…
Our Project
• Research Objective: To understand the changes in shelf scores when
students may repeat the shelf at the end of the year
• Hypothesis: Shelf scores will increase for individual students when
students are allowed to repeat the exam
• Importance: This may impact the clerkship summative (grading)
structure
Background
• Mean scores on clerkship examinations improve steadily as the
academic year progresses
• 12 week IM clerkship, 1983-84, 1984-85, and 1985-86, University of Illinois
College of Medicine at Chicago)1

• 8 & 12 week Surgery clerkships, 8/1994-7/1995, US Medical Schools2

• 12 week Surgery clerkship, 6/1985-5/1986, Medical College of Ohio, Toledo,


Ohio3

1. Whalen JP, Moses VK. The effect on grades of the timing and site of third-year internal medicine clerkships. Acad Med 1990;65:708-9.
2. Ripkey DR, Case SM, Swanson DB. Predicting performances on the NBME Surgery Subject Test and USMLE Step 2: the effects of surgery clerkship timing
and length. Acad Med. 1997 Oct;72(10 Suppl 1):S31-3.
3. Baciewicz FA Jr1, Arent L, Weaver M, Yeastings R, Thomford NR. Influence of clerkship structure and timing on individual student performance. Am J
Surg. 1990 Feb;159(2):265-8.
Methods
• 25 MS3’s repeated NBME FM Core at the end of their clinical year
(3/2014) Optional
• Paired T-test analysis was conducted to compare performance
differences between the two administrations of the NBME Family
Medicine subject exam
Results
Rotation # of students/rotation who retook the shelf
1 4
2 1
3 6
4 2
5 3
6 4
7 1
8 5
n=26
Results
NBME, 1st NBME, 2nd
Administration Administration
Our Students - Scaled 60-80 57-90
Range
Our Students - Mean 67.68 72.5
Our Students - SD 5.12 7.87
National Mean, SD 71.9, 8.7 71.9, 8.7

t(24)=-2.66, p=.001
2 students repeated the year voluntarily, so we pulled them out of this analysis

Effect size between the two administrations was measured using Cohen’s D which yielded a large effect size at 0.79
Conclusion…
• These results suggest that time on clerkships does influence exam
performance.
• There may be a bias that "high-achievers" and students going into
FM are most likely to opt to optionally repeat the shelf exam...and so
they would be more likely to improve/study a lot to ensure that
improvement...
• There was no difference in timing of original rotation! ½ before
midpoint and ½ after!
• Questions?
• I’d love your feedback – Next steps?
• Please complete the evaluation on the app

You might also like