Approaches To Industrial Relations

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Approaches to IR

Dr. Shekhar
[email protected]
9868729476
A. IR Background

• Industrial Relations in past era was in the context of


artisan guilds – as scale & size of industrial activities
were small – therefore relation was simple and direct
• But in Modern days there is a great complexity of IR in
terms of legality as well as size of enterprises. These
factors make IR complicated.
• IR is primarily based on individual perceptions of what
is right in terms of 'fairness', exercise of power and
authority
• It is two ways process - attitude and behaviour of
employers toward workers/ TU determine later
attitude and behaviour. Or vice versa.
B. IR within System framework
developed by Dunlop
• Theoretical perspective of IR ranging from
unitarism of exploitative capitalism to the radical
response of unions of ultra left & middle path of
pluralism
• Definition of IR - It is relation between employees
and representative of employers
• term 'IR' refer all aspects of employment
relations.
• term 'industry' widest sense include all forms of
economic activities - agriculture, manufacturing,
service etc.
Exhibit 1
• Human Relation - Relations between human
being - include all categories, highly broad
parameter;
• Employee Relations - Between individual and
employer; Relations among employees;
• Employment Relations - Relations between
parties, either individual or collective;
• Industrial Relations - Collective relations
between management and union
Aims of IR from different interest point
of views
• from management - achieve best result/
outcome with lest inputs
• from workers/ TU points of view - improve
wage, working conditions, gain control over
work, secure redressal of grievances, and in
some cases pursue political actions.
• from Government perspective - develop
sound labour - management relation for
economic/ social development
Employer's Attitude toward unions
with reflective behaviour
• (Fahlbeck 1996 - IJCLLIR)
• Attitude Behaviour
•  Contempt Dictatorial
• Adversarial Paternal
• Acceptance Businesslike
• Cooperation Participative
•  
• Fahlbeck interpretation on attitude
•  
• =My boat attitude - get off from it if don't
like it
• = Shared boat attitude - we sail together
• = our Boat - combine our effort to
better it
• = Your boat - sense of ownership
IR and International Instruments
• ILO has been champion on 'Freedom of
Association and Right to Collective Bargaining'
• ILO in 1998 Declaration on Fundamental
principles and Rights at work (Decent work)
IR Disputes – not always bad
• Problem of IR existed in the past and continue
to exist in every economic system.
• Discontent and unrest per se are not bad - it
open opportunity for progress, development,
managerial capability enhancement etc.
• More than ownership, it is the behaviour, values
and underlying assumptions which make a
fundamental difference in IR at micro and macro
level
Purpose of IR
• secure highest level of mutual understanding &
goodwill between several interests linked with
production/ associated activities.
• friendly atmosphere and spirit of working
together for a common purpose must be
developed' - for achieving this objective -
responsibilities lies equally to both parties.
• The options for labour and management include
coercion, conflict, competition, compromise, co-
option or collaboration, the last being generally
accepted as the preferred mode.
• purpose of IR not just 'peace'.
• peace at any price policy will solve one problem
but bring many others.
• industrial relations is an art, the art of living
together for purposes of production/ services' -
Richardson, 1959.
• It apply knowledge derived from the principle of
many disciplines : economics, law, human/
industrial psychology, anthropology, sociology,
social work, etc.

You might also like