The document discusses various aspects of the social and cultural environment that affect businesses, including factors like attitudes, demographics, religion, and education. It also covers models of corporate social responsibility, such as Carroll's pyramid model which defines CSR across economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities. Another model by Ackerman suggests that corporations progress through three phases in developing social responsiveness: acknowledging issues, studying problems, and ultimately integrating policies into operations. The cultural environment influences consumer behavior and marketing decisions.
The document discusses various aspects of the social and cultural environment that affect businesses, including factors like attitudes, demographics, religion, and education. It also covers models of corporate social responsibility, such as Carroll's pyramid model which defines CSR across economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities. Another model by Ackerman suggests that corporations progress through three phases in developing social responsiveness: acknowledging issues, studying problems, and ultimately integrating policies into operations. The cultural environment influences consumer behavior and marketing decisions.
Original Description:
Social Environment & Corporate Social Responsibility
The document discusses various aspects of the social and cultural environment that affect businesses, including factors like attitudes, demographics, religion, and education. It also covers models of corporate social responsibility, such as Carroll's pyramid model which defines CSR across economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities. Another model by Ackerman suggests that corporations progress through three phases in developing social responsiveness: acknowledging issues, studying problems, and ultimately integrating policies into operations. The cultural environment influences consumer behavior and marketing decisions.
The document discusses various aspects of the social and cultural environment that affect businesses, including factors like attitudes, demographics, religion, and education. It also covers models of corporate social responsibility, such as Carroll's pyramid model which defines CSR across economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic responsibilities. Another model by Ackerman suggests that corporations progress through three phases in developing social responsiveness: acknowledging issues, studying problems, and ultimately integrating policies into operations. The cultural environment influences consumer behavior and marketing decisions.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27
Topic 1 – Social Environment
Social environment of business means all factors which
affects business socially . Every business works in a society , so societies different factors like family, educational institutions and religion affects business .
It includes the culture that the individual was educated or
lives in, and the people with whom they interact.
The cultural factors like buying and consumption habit of
the people, customs and traditions, tastes and preferences, languages etc. are the factors that affect the strategy of the business. Cultural Environment The cultural environment mean a environment which affect the basic values, behaviours, and preferences of the society-all of which have an effect on consumer marketing decisions.
Socio-cultural Environment A set of beliefs, customs, practices and behaviour that exists within a population.
International companies often include an examination of
the socio-cultural environment prior to entering their target markets. Factors which effect social and cultural environment • Attitude of people. • Natural Factor. • Demographic Factor. • Technological Factor. • Religion • Income & Life Style. • Social Responsibility. • Health & Safety • Taste & Preference. Factor. • Education. • Family. Topic 2: -Corporate social responsibility Corporate social responsibility encompasses the economic, legal, ethical and philanthropic expectations placed on organizations by society at a given point of time.
Corporate Social Responsiveness refers to the
capacity of a corporation to respond to social pressures. THE STAKEHOLDER CONCEPT OF CSR •Legally binding contracts •Rights and claims to corporations •Protection of employee rights •Speculative interests of shareholders •Stakeholder’ s ability to influence corporate decisions •Corporate governance Stakeholders Classification Topic 3: - THE ARCHIE CARROLL MODEL The Corporate Social Responsibility pyramid was framed to embrace the entire spectrum of society’s expectations of business responsibilities and define them in terms of categories.
According to the model, four kinds of social responsibilities
constitute total Corporate Social Responsibility: •Economic (“make profit”), •Legal (“obey the law”), •Ethical (“be ethical”), and •Philanthropic (“be a good corporate citizen”). Carroll’s four part model of social responsibility Theoretical Assumptions:
The central assumptions underlying the Corporate Social
Responsibility pyramid are presented below. Nature of Corporate Social Responsibility taking a managerial approach, the four-part pyramid defines Corporate Social Responsibility in terms of social expectations that responsible corporations should strive to meet. Prevailing social norms and expectations provide external criteria against which corporate performance can be measured; thus, the notion of responsibility in the pyramid model is reduced to normative restraints of responsiveness. In other words, Corporate Social Responsibility in the pyramid formulation is basically accommodative. Suggesting that businesses should treat Corporate Social Responsibility not as a goal to be maximized but as a constraint, the pyramid does in effect promote satisfying behavior rather than striving for excellence. Topic 4: - ACKERMAN’S MODEL
Micro-level theorist Robert Ackerman was among the
earliest people to suggest that responsiveness, (he prefers to use the term ‘responsiveness’), should be the goal of corporate social endeavour.
Ackerman described three phases through which
companies commonly tend to pass in developing a response to social issues as explained in the following Table: In Phase 1, a corporation’s top managers deal an existing social problem. At this stage, no one asks the company to deal with it. The Chief Executive Officer merely acknowledges the problem by making a written or oral statement of the company’s policy towards it.
In Phase 2, the company hires staff specialists or engages outside
consultants to study the problem and to suggest ways of dealing with it. Up to this point, the company has limited itself to declaring its intentions and formulating its plans.
Phase 3 is implementation. The company now integrates the policy
into its ongoing operations. Unfortunately, implementation often comes slowly and often not until the government or public opinion forces the company to act. But by that time, the company has lost the initiative. Ackerman thus advises that managers should “act early in the life cycle of any social issue in order to enjoy the largest amount of managerial discretion over the outcome.”