Teori Himpunan Dan Logika
Teori Himpunan Dan Logika
Teori Himpunan Dan Logika
PERNYATA AN I
T E O R I H I M P U N A N DA N L O G I K A
M AT E M AT I K A
KELOMPOK 2
The Member Of Group 2 :
• Friko Ari Ferdiantoko (171810101032)
• Alfrida Putri Puspitasari (171810101042)
• Vina Alpiani Juniar (171810101065)
ALJABAR BENTUK PERNYATAAN
• If we drew up a set up the form of statements with a coat of arms conjunctive to be obtained
new the form of statements .Conjunctive was the biggest operation of in the form of
statements , and we have an algebra that is called algebra the form of statements .The form of
statements can only have two values , namely the value of right and value wrongly .Among
others who will be worth the form of statements right is called tautology who have been
given a coat of arms U , while the always worth wrong is called contradiction given an
emblem of C.
• After laying the groundwork algebra the form of statements , maybe it was conjectures
elements that is , operations , and the relations , which are then tried to verify whether the
allegations right or wrong .Was right and were regarded have important usually appointed into
a theorem , and will be law logic which is particularly beneficial.
THEOREM 2.1
( THE NATURE OF COMMUTATIVE)
If p and q the form of statements so :
(i) p q q p
(ii) p q q p
THEOREM2.2
( THE NATURE OF DISTRIBUTIVE )
If p , q and r the form of statements so :
(i) p (q r) (p q) (p r)
(ii) p (q r) (p q) (p r)
THEOREM 2.3
( THE NATURE OF IDENTITY)
If C, U and P the form of statements with C a contradiction and U a
tautology , so for each p applies :
(i) p C p
(ii) p U p
THEOREM 2.4
( THE NATURE OF COMPLEMENT)
If C, U , and P the form of statements with C a contradiction and U
a tautology , so for each P applies :
(i) p ~ p U
(ii) p ~ p C
THEOREM 2.5
(i) p U U
(ii) p C C
Theorem is evidenced by using table value. Will evidenced by theorem 2.1 until theorem 2.4.
p U (p U) U (Theorem 2.3(ii))
(p U) ( p ~ p) (Theorem 2.4(i))
( p ~ p) (p U) (Theorem 2.1(ii))
U (Theorem 2.4(i))
C (Theorem 1.2.4(ii))
Theorem 2.6
For every p apply p p p
Theorem 2.7
For every p apply p p p
THANK YOU